Not applicable.
This invention relates to sports throwing implements, specifically a javelin adapted to youth athletes.
The javelin, as a sporting implement, has been in use for millennia. In its modern form, javelins are typically manufactured of aluminum, carbon fiber or steel, or a combination thereof, and have specific dimensional criteria, such as weight and center of gravity locations, they must meet to be used in athletic competitions such as the Olympics or interscholastic track and field meets. Men's and women's javelins differ in certain key metrics, with weight being a central distinguishing feature. For reference, men's javelins weigh nominally 800 g, and women's javelins weigh nominally 600 g.
When a dimensionally ‘legal’ javelin, i.e. a javelin meeting the dimensional criteria set by organizations governing various athletic competitions, is thrown with proper technique, the javelin will follow an optimal flight path. Efficient, optimal javelin flight consists of a climbing phase, a gliding phase, and a turnover to landing phase. Essential to achieving this optimal flight path is making sure the force vector of the throw is lined up with a preferred angle of inclination (i.e. as measured upwards from of the horizontal plane); generally about 35 degrees (in no wind conditions). This alignment of the force vector with the angle of inclination is known in the sport as “throwing through the point.” With good alignment, the javelin produces minimum drag and flies farther than with poor alignment in pitch, yaw or sideslip. Javelins shaped for efficient flight will reveal the nature of whatever misalignment they experience—for example, a javelin thrown with the force vector of the throw under the javelin's preferred angle of inclination while the javelin longitudinal axis is released at the preferred angle of inclination will produce a visible stall, creating unwanted drag and reduced distance. Yaw and sideslip misalignments are also easy to see by a trained eye. The aerodynamic drag produced by a misaligned throw also produces a higher load on the athlete's arm, shoulder and torso, depending on how early or late in the throwing action the misalignment occurs. This effect is similar to dragging a hand through water, i.e. a hand held with the palm facing the direction of travel will experience a higher drag load than a hand held with the palm parallel to the direction of travel. Throwing a javelin that reveals the thrower's alignment errors provides important feedback to avoid excessive loads on the athlete and achieve farther throws. Such alignment skill is best learned as soon as possible in an athlete's development. Hence, the need for a youth javelin that mimics the flight characteristics of their senior counterparts.
Typical youth javelins are not optimized to fly like their senior counterparts therefore they do not provide useful feedback for several reasons. Primarily, they have not been proportioned or balanced to fly efficiently when thrown at release speeds typically produced by youth athletes. Secondarily, the materials typically used for youth-scaled javelins are usually the same materials used in the larger models offered by javelin suppliers for reasons of economy and similarities in manufacturing processes. For example, a 300 gram javelin offered by a major producer of javelins is made of aluminum, as are their full-scale javelins, which makes a javelin scaled for youth release speeds too heavy for its surface area to produce an efficient flight. It would be as if an aircraft manufacturer precisely scaled down its jet fighter but installed a very low-powered engine; sub-optimal performance would result. The surface proportions need to change in aircraft when the speeds differ greatly to achieve similar flight performance, as in the case with javelins. World class male javelin throwers produce release speeds of about 28 meters/second, while youth athletes throw at about 13 meters/second. To make a javelin light enough for young athletes to throw, for example in the 200 g to 300 g range, at youth release speeds and follow an optimal flight path like their senior full-scale counterparts, the weight-to-surface-arearatio needs to be optimized.
Accordingly, youth athletes using typically available javelins do not learn optimal and efficient throwing technique and are not rewarded as often with successful throws. Moreover, as youth athletes throw with sub-optimal technique, they are more likely to be prone to injury either due to improper throwing form, or simply throwing too much as they search for an elusive ideal throw. Accordingly, described herein is a youth javelin with an appropriate weight, length, surface to area ration and other dimensional criteria such that when thrown with proper technique the youth javelin will fly at or near an optimal flight path like their full-size counterparts, thus imprinting on youth athletes proper throwing technique they will not have to unlearn as they advance to larger javelins, decreasing the likelihood of injury, and providing a more satisfying path to throwing success.
The present application provides for a youth javelin optimized for young athletes near or at the beginning of their throwing careers. When thrown at a proper angle of inclination and with sufficient release velocity, the youth javelin will follow an optimal flight path. A preferred youth javelin weight is around 250 g for youth athletes approximately in the 7 to 10 years old age range. A low weight allows for more throwing repetitions before overuse injuries might become an issue. For reference, a Little League baseball weighs approximately 145 g and a football used in Pee Wee football leagues weighs approximately 270 g.
The length of the youth javelin in a preferred embodiment has a length of 138.5 cm, and may be in the range of 135 cm to 148 cm. This length is typically long enough for a youth thrower to see the tip of the youth javelin with their peripheral vision during the course of their throw through run-up and release, which allows the thrower to maintain proper alignment. Additionally, the weight-to-surface-area ratio of the youth javelin is about 0.24 g/cm2. Compare this to the weight-to-surface-area ratio of full-sized javelins of about 0.32 g/cm2. The balance point, i.e. center of gravity, is located approximately 58.5 cm from the tip along the longitudinal axis. Collectively, these dimensional parameters provide a youth javelin meeting the objective of efficient javelin flight along an optimal flight path when released at a proper angle of inclination at a release velocities common to younger throwers.
These and other aspects, features and embodiments are set forth within this application, including the following detailed description and attached drawings. Unless expressly stated otherwise, all embodiments, aspects, features, etc. can be mixed and matched, combined and permuted in any desired manner.
A preferred embodiment of the youth javelin 5 is shown in
The preferred weight of the javelin 5 is 250 g and may be in the range of 240 g and 265 g. A low weight of 250 grams allows a youth athlete more throwing repetitions before overuse injuries become an issue. In Little League baseball, where the implement weight is about 145 g, it is well known that too much throwing can be harmful. The football used in Pee Wee football leagues (age 9) weighs 270 g. By keeping the weight of a preferred embodiment as low as economically feasible, the risk of overuse injuries is reduced, and the flight characteristics are enhanced.
A preferred embodiment has an overall length of 138.5 cm and may be in the range of 135 cm and 148 cm from the forward end of the tip to the end of the tail. The diameter of the youth javelin 5 shaft 15 in a preferred embodiment is nominally 24.7 mm, but may be in the range of 24 mm and 26 mm. In a preferred embodiment, the shaft is engineered to deflect (bend) perpendicular to the longitudinal axis when a component of the force vector imparted by a thrower is not parallel, i.e. “across”, to the longitudinal axis. A certain level of deflection or bending of shaft 15 is desirable. In a preferred embodiment, optimal shaft deflection is measured whereby when shaft 15 is supported horizontally 43.5 cm at support points 36′ and 36″ on either side of balance point 35. When a load of 14 lbs is applied perpendicular to the shaft longitudinal axis 38 at the balance point 35. The preferred deflection is in a range of 15 mm to 30 mm.
In a preferred embodiment, the shaft 15 is constructed from a molded plastic extrusion having internal longitudinal ridges 16 (Ref.
The weight-to-surface-area ratio, as measured in grams per square centimeter; of a preferred embodiment may have a weight-to-surface-area ratio of substantially 0.24 g/cm2 and may be in the range 0.2000 g/cm2 to 0.2595 g/cm2. The surface area is inclusive of the exterior surfaces of the tip 10, shaft 15, tail 20 and handle 25. When determining the surface area of the handle or grip, surface contours, such as a molded in grip enhancing textures or use of a corded grip can be ignored and the handle surface area presumed to be substantially flat for surface area calculation purposes.
Refer now to
Refer now to
Refer now to
Selected The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” and “includes” and/or “including” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The terms of degree such as “substantially”, “about” and “approximately” as used herein mean a reasonable amount of deviation of the modified term such that the end result is not significantly changed. For example, these terms can be construed as including a deviation of at least ±5% of the modified term if this deviation would not negate the meaning of the word it modifies.
The term “suitable,” as used herein, means having characteristics that are sufficient to produce a desired result. Suitability for the intended purpose can be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art using only routine experimentation.
Moreover, terms that are expressed as “means-plus function” in the claims should include any structure that can be utilized to carry out the function of that part of the present invention. In addition, the term “configured” as used herein to describe a component, section or part of a device includes hardware and/or software that is constructed and/or programmed to carry out the desired function. Different aspects of the invention may be combined in any suitable way.
While only selected embodiments have been chosen to illustrate the present invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure that various changes and modifications can be made herein without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims. Furthermore, the foregoing description of the embodiments according to the present invention are provided for illustration only, and not for the purpose of limiting the present invention as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents. Thus, the scope of the present invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments.
This present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/525,423 filed on Jul. 7, 2023, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63525423 | Jul 2023 | US |