Zeolite catalyst and method of preparing and use of zeolite catalyst

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7368410
  • Patent Number
    7,368,410
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 3, 2005
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 6, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
A zeolite catalyst is prepared by treating a zeolite with a phosphorus compound to form a phosphorus-treated zeolite. The phosphorus-treated zeolite is heated to a temperature of about 300° C. or higher and combined with an inorganic oxide binder material to form a zeolite-binder mixture. The zeolite-binder mixture is heated to a temperature of about 400° C. or higher to form a bound zeolite catalyst. The bound zeolite may exhibit at least two 31P MAS NMR peaks with maxima at from about 0 to about −55 ppm, with at least one peak having a maximum at from about −40 to about −50 ppm. Zeolites containing 10-oxygen ring pores that have been prepared in such a way may be used in aromatic alkylation by contacting the bound zeolite catalyst with an aromatic alkylation feed of an aromatic compound and an alkylating agent under reaction conditions suitable for aromatic alkylation.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates generally to the alkylation of aromatic compounds and catalysts used for such reactions and their preparation.


BACKGROUND

Para-xylene is a valuable substituted aromatic compound because of its great demand for its oxidation to terephthalic acid, a major component in forming polyester fibers and resins. It can be commercially produced from hydrotreating of naphtha (catalytic reforming), steam cracking of naphtha or gas oil, and toluene disproportionation.


Alkylation of toluene with methanol, which is also known as toluene methylation, has been used in laboratory studies to produce para-xylene. Toluene methylation has been known to occur over acidic catalyst, particularly over zeolite or zeolite-type catalyst. In particular, ZSM-5-type zeolite, zeolite Beta and silicaaluminophosphate (SAPO) catalysts have been used for this process. Generally, a thermodynamic equilibrium mixture of ortho (o)-, meta (m)- and para (p)-xylenes can be formed from the methylation of toluene, as is illustrated by the reaction below.




embedded image


Thermodynamic equilibrium compositions of o-, m-, and p-xylenes may be around 25, 50 and 25 mole %, respectively, at a reaction temperature of about 500° C. Such toluene methylation may occur over a wide range of temperatures, however. Byproducts such as C9+ and other aromatic products can be produced by secondary alkylation of the xylene product.


Para-xylene can be separated from mixed xylenes by a cycle of adsorption and isomerization. Such cycle may have to be repeated several times because of the low isomeric concentration in the equilibrium mixture. A high purity grade (99+%) p-xylene is desirable for its oxidation to terephthalic acid. The production cost for such a high purity grade p-xylene can be very high, however. A different method that employs crystallization techniques can be used and may be less expensive where the concentration of p-xylene is around 80% or higher in the initial xylene product. Thus, higher than equilibrium concentrations of p-xylene may be desirable.


A significantly higher amount of p-xylene can be obtained in toluene methylation reaction if the catalyst has shape selective properties. Shape selective properties can be obtained in modified zeolite catalysts by narrowing zeolite pore opening size, inactivation of the external surface of the zeolite or controlling zeolite acidity. Toluene methylation may occur over modified ZSM-5 or ZSM-5-type zeolite catalyst giving xylene products containing significantly greater amounts of p-xylene than the thermodynamic concentration.


Unfortunately, there are a number of technical hurdles for toluene methylation to be commercially successful and improvements are needed. Among these are fast catalyst deactivation and low methanol selectivity.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, in which:



FIG. 1 shows 31P MAS-NMR spectrum for phosphorus-modified ZSM-5 zeolite Catalyst A;



FIG. 2 shows 31P MAS-NMR spectra for Catalysts I (spectrum a) and K (spectrum b);



FIG. 3 shows 31P MAS-NMR spectra for a phosphorus-modified ZSM-5 zeolite (spectrum a) precursor used for preparing Catalysts L and M, and for an alumina bound phosphorus-modified ZSM-5 zeolite—Catalyst M (spectrum b);



FIG. 4 is a plot of toluene conversion over time for the toluene methylation reaction for Catalyst L of Example 14;



FIG. 5 is a plot of methanol selectivity (curve 1), mixed-xylene selectivity (curve 2) and p-xylene selectivity (curve 3) over time for the toluene methylation reaction for Catalyst L of Example 14;



FIG. 6 is a plot of toluene conversion over time for the toluene methylation reaction for Catalyst M of Example 15;



FIG. 7 is a plot of methanol selectivity (curve 1), mixed-xylene selectivity (curve 2) and p-xylene selectivity (curve 3) over time for the toluene methylation reaction for Catalyst M of Example 15; and



FIG. 8 is a plot of toluene conversion over time for the toluene methylation reaction for Catalyst A of Example 16.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

ZSM-5 zeolite is one of the most versatile catalysts used in hydrocarbon conversions. It is a porous material containing intersecting two-dimensional pore structure with 10-membered oxygen rings. Zeolite materials with such 10-membered oxygen ring pore structures are often classified as medium-pore zeolites. Modification of ZSM-5-type zeolite catalysts with phosphorus-containing compounds has been shown to provide shape selective properties to the catalyst, yielding significantly greater amounts of p-xylene than the thermodynamic equilibrium value when used in toluene methylation compared to unmodified catalysts. Such modification has been shown to provide selectivity for p-xylenes of greater than 80%. Although such phosphorus-treated ZSM-5 catalysts may have a high selectivity for p-xylene, they tend to deactivate at a very fast rate; for example, the catalyst may lose greater than 50% of its initial activity within a day. This may possibly be due to coke deposition on the catalyst.


As used herein, the expression “ZSM-5-type” is meant to refer to those zeolites that are isostructurally the same as ZSM-5 zeolites. Additionally, the expressions “ZSM-5” and “ZSM-5-type” may also be used herein interchangeably to encompass one another and should not be construed in a limiting sense. As used herein, catalytic activity can be expressed as the % moles of the toluene converted with respect to the moles of toluene fed and can be defined by the following formulas:

Mole % Toluene Conversion=[(Ti−To)/Ti]×100  (2)

where, Ti is the number of moles of toluene fed and To is the number of moles toluene unreacted. As used herein, selectivity for mixed xylenes may be expressed as:

Mole % Mixed Xylene Selectivity=[Xtx/(Ti−To)]×100  (3)

where, Xtx is the number of moles of mixed (o-, m- or p-) xylenes in the product. As used herein, selectivity for p-xylene may be expressed as:

Mole % p-Xylene Selectivity=(Xp/Xtx)×100  (4)

where, Xp is the number of moles of p-xylene. As used herein, methanol conversion may be expressed as:

Mole % Methanol Conversion=[(Mi−Mo)/Mi]×100  (5)

where, Mi is the number of moles of methanol fed and Mo is the number of moles methanol unreacted. As used herein, methanol selectivity for toluene methylation may be expressed as:

Mole % Methanol Selectivity=[Xtx/(Mi−Mo)]×100  (6)

where, Xtx is the number of moles of mixed (o-, m- or p-) xylenes, Mi is the number of moles of methanol fed and Mo is the number of moles of unreacted methanol.


The ZSM-5 zeolite catalysts and their preparation are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,702,886, which is herein incorporated by reference. In the present invention, the ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst may include those having a silica/alumina molar ratio of 200 or higher, more particularly from about 250 to about 500 prior to modification. The starting ZSM-5 may be an NH4+ or H+ form and may contain traces of other cations.


The ZSM-5 may be modified by treating with phosphorus-containing compounds. Such phosphorus-containing compounds may include, but are not limited to, phosphonic, phosphinous, phosphorus and phosphoric acids, salts and esters of such acids and phosphorous halides. In particular, phosphoric acid (H3PO4) and ammonium hydrogen phosphate ((NH4)2HPO4) may be used as the phosphorus-containing compound to provide a catalyst for toluene methylation with shape selective properties to provide increased p-xylene selectivity. Such modified catalysts may contain phosphorus (P) in an amount of from about 0.01 to about 0.15 g P/g zeolite, more particularly from about 0.02 to about 0.13 g P/g zeolite, and more particularly from about 0.07 g P/g zeolite to about 0.12 g P/g zeolite, and still more particularly from about 0.09 g P/g zeolite to about 0.11 g P/g zeolite. After phosphorus treatment, the phosphorus-treated zeolite may be dried.


It has been discovered that increased para-selectivity may be achieved in aromatic alkylation, particularly for toluene alkylation, when the P-modified zeolite is heated at 300° C. or higher after phosphorus treatment, and is then subsequently bound with a suitable binder, as is discussed later on. This heating may result in the formation of various phosphorus species within the zeolite. Such heating may also facilitate drying of the catalyst after the phosphorus treatment. Temperatures of 300° C., 400° C. or more are particularly useful in providing such increased para-selectivity. A suitable range for such heating subsequent to phosphorus treatment is from about 300° C. to about 600° C. Such heating may be carried out for 0.5 hour or more.


It has been further discovered that combining the P-treated ZSM-5 (P/ZSM-5) with a suitable binder after the initial heating step, as discussed above, may further increase product selectivity in aromatic alkylation. In particular, the P/ZSM-5 when heated and then bound with a suitable binder the catalyst may provide an increased selectivity for para-xylene by at least 5% compared to the same catalyst unbound when used in toluene methylation under similar conditions. Suitable binder materials may include inorganic oxide materials. Examples of such materials include alumina, clay, aluminum phosphate and silica-alumina. In particular, a binder of alumina or clay or their combinations are particularly useful. The bound catalyst may contain from about 1% to about 99% by total weight of bound catalyst, more particularly from about 10% to about 50% binder by total weight of bound catalyst.


To form the bound catalyst, the binder material may be combined with the phosphorus-treated zeolite to form an extrudable mixture. The P-treated zeolite bound with the binder may be calcined or heated at a temperature of 400° C. or higher, more particularly at a temperature between 500° C. and 700° C. Such heating may be carried out for 0.5 hours or more to form the bound catalyst. It has been discovered that heating the P-treated ZSM-5 at a temperature of about 300° C. or higher and then binding the zeolite with a suitable binder, as described herein, may result in the bound zeolite exhibiting multiple P-species, as shown by 31P MAS NMR peaks.


In particular, the bound zeolite catalyst may exhibit at least two peaks having maxima at from about 0 ppm to about −55 ppm. More particularly, the bound zeolite catalyst may exhibit a 31P MAS NMR peak having a maximum at from about 0 ppm to about −25 ppm, more particularly at from about −5 ppm to about −20 ppm, and another with a maximum at from about −40 ppm to about −50 ppm. Such peaks are an indication of various phosphorus species. In particular, a 31P MAS NMR peak with maximum of about −44 ppm may be indicative of polyphosphate species. A peak with a maximum at from about 0 ppm to about −25 ppm may be indicative of phosphorus bound by extra-framework aluminum or amorphous alumina. Aluminophosphates (AIPO4) and silicoaluminophosphates (SAPO) may be indicated by a peak with a maximum at around −28 ppm to about −35 ppm. Free phosphates may be indicated by a peak with a maximum at around 0 ppm.


This is in contrast to a bound P-modified zeolite catalyst that has been calcined or heated at the same temperature, but where the unbound P-modified zeolite precursor has not undergone heating at a temperature of 300° C. or more. Such bound P-modified zeolite catalysts have been shown to exhibit only a single 31P MAS NMR peak. This indicates a difference in the interaction between the binder and the phosphorus species that is dependent upon the heating temperature of the unbound P-modified zeolite precursor.


The P-modified ZSM-5 catalyst, bound or unbound, may be mildly steamed at a temperature of 300° C. or lower before using the catalyst in any reaction. The steaming can be carried out in-situ or ex-situ of the reactor. The use of catalyst steaming at mild temperatures is described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/122,919, filed May 5, 2005, entitled “Hydrothermal Treatment of Phosphorus-Modified Zeolite Catalysts,” which is herein incorporated by reference.


The P-modified ZSM-5 catalyst, bound or unbound, may be contacted with an appropriate feed of an aromatic hydrocarbon and an alkylating agent under alkylation reaction conditions to carry out aromatic alkylation. The catalyst has particular application for use in toluene methylation utilizing a toluene/methanol feed. A gas cofeed may also be used. The cofeed gas may include hydrogen or an inert gas. As used herein, the expression “alklyation feed” is meant to encompass the aromatic compound and the alkylating agent. As used herein, the expression “methylation feed” is meant to encompass the feed of toluene and methanol.


In addition to any cofeed gas, water that may be in the form of steam, may also be introduced into the reactor as cofeed along with the alkylation feed. The water or steam used for the methylation reaction may be introduced with or without hydrogen or inert gas as cofeed with the alkylation feed to the reactor during the start up of the alkylation reaction, or it may be introduced subsequent to initial start up. In either case, liquid water may be added and vaporized prior to its mixing with cofeed gas (if any) and the alkylation feed. The use of water cofeed is described in U.S. Patent App. Publication No. US2005/0070749 A1, published Mar. 31, 2005, and entitled “Toluene Methylation Process,” which is herein incorporated by reference.


The reactor pressure for toluene methylation or other aromatic alkylation may vary, but typically ranges from about 10 to about 1000 psig. Reactor temperatures may vary, but typically range from about 400 to about 700° C. Upon introduction of feed into the reactor, the catalyst bed temperature may be adjusted to a selected reaction temperature to effect a desired conversion. The temperature may be increased gradually at a rate of from about 1° C./min to about 10° C./min to provide the desired final reactor temperature. As used in the examples, reactor temperature refers to the temperature as measured at the inlet of catalyst bed of the reactor.


The reaction may be carried out in a variety of different reactors that are commonly used for carrying out aromatic alkylation reactions. Single or multiple reactors in series and/or parallel are suitable for carrying out the aromatic alkylation.


The P-modified ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst, as described herein, has particular application for use in toluene methylation for preparing a xylene product from a feed of toluene and methanol. The catalyst provides increased selectivity for p-xylene when used in toluene methylation. In particular, the catalyst may provide greater than 85%, 90% or 95% para-xylene selectivity when used in toluene methylation. Additionally, in certain instances, greater than 95% of total xylene selectivity may be achieved.


Additionally, the P/ZSM-5 catalyst described herein, bound or unbound, may provide steady catalyst activity and selectivity for toluene methylation over periods of 25 days, 30 days, 60 days or more under appropriate reaction conditions. In carrying out such reactions for steady catalyst performance, the catalyst may be contacted with a methylation feed and gas cofeed at a suitable temperature to give a desired toluene conversion. In the examples discussed below, the desired toluene conversion was 63% of theoretical maximum toluene conversion using a methylation feed containing a toluene/methanol molar ratio of about 4.5. The reaction was carried out at a constant reactor temperature over the test period.


The following examples better serve to illustrate the invention.


EXAMPLES

Catalyst A


A binder-free, P-modified ZSM-5 (P/ZSM-5) was prepared. The starting zeolite powder was an NH4-ZSM-5 powder having SiO2/Al2O3 mole ratio of 280. A slurry containing 700 g of NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite and 700 ml of water was prepared in a 2-L beaker. The beaker was placed on a hot plate and the zeolite slurry was stirred using a mechanical (overhead) stirrer with 250-300 rpm. The temperature of the slurry was slowly raised to about 80-85° C. A phosphoric acid solution containing 319 g of phosphoric acid (Aldrich, 85 wt % in aqueous) was slowly added to the slurry. The slurry temperature was further increased to between 95-100° C. and heating was continued until all liquid was evaporated. The phosphoric-acid modified zeolite was then heated in a convection oven in air at the following temperature program: 90° C. to 120° C. for three hours, at 340° C. to 360° C. for three hours and at 510° C. to 530° C. under air for 10 hours. The resulting heat-treated zeolite (Catalyst A) was then crushed and sized using 20 and 40 mesh screens for catalytic reaction or sieved through 80 mesh screen for binding the zeolite with a binder.


Catalyst A was analyzed for Si, Al and P by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and for BET surface area and total pore volume by N2 adsorption. As shown in Table 1, Catalyst A contained 35.73 wt % Si, 0.28 wt % Al and 9.01 wt % P, and had a BET surface area of 160 m2/g and total pore volume of 0.12 ml/g. The X-ray diffraction pattern for Catalyst A was recorded on a Philips (X'Pert model) diffractometer over a range of 5-55° at a scan rate 2° per minute using CuKα1 radiation. The results are presented in Table 2.











TABLE 1







Elemental Analysis, wt %
N2 Adsorption













Si
Al
P
SA, m2/g
PV, ml/g

31P MAS NMR






35.73
0.28
9.01
160
0.12
See spectrum FIG. 1
















TABLE 2







Powder XRD Intensity*










d-spacing [A]
Intensity














11.09
100



10.00
55



9.88
42



9.68
17



8.02
8



6.68
7



6.33
8



5.98
16



5.69
7



5.56
9



4.25
9



4.00
6



3.84
50



3.81
31



3.71
27



3.64
10



3.52
22



2.98
8



2.78
5







*Intensities shown are scaled in arbitrary units so that most intense peak is 100.






Solid state Magic Angle Spinning (MAS) NMR spectra were recorded on Catalyst A with 400 MHz spectrometer (27Al at 104.5 MHz) at room temperature (27Al MAS NMR). Samples were packed in silicon nitride rotors (Si3N4) and spun at 13 to KHz sample spinning (about 800000 rpm). A 10 degree tip and recycle delay of 0.5 s were used to avoid saturation. About 4000 to 10000 scans were accumulated to signal average and improve signal/noise ratio. Proton decoupling was not employed. All spectra were referenced to aluminum chloride hexahydrate (run separately in a tube) at 0.0 ppm on the chemical shift scale. This leads to an internal reference of 104.85 ppm on the aluminum nitride (small impurity in the silicon nitride rotors) peak. The Catalyst A sample shows a weak peak at 55-50 ppm region assigned to structural tetrahedral aluminum. The tetrahedral aluminum peak is severely distorted, indicating the presence of nested silanols caused by holes in the structure upon removal of some of the framework aluminum. The adjacent peak (30-40 ppm) peak is due to severely distorted but still in the framework aluminum atoms probably either in the 3 or 5 coordination with oxygens. The biggest peak in the spectrum at −14 ppm is from octahedrally coordinated aluminum atoms that are formed when tetrahedrally coordinated framework aluminum is removed from the zeolite framework by the phosphate modification process as mentioned above.


Solid state Magic Angle Spinning (MAS) NMR spectra were recorded on Catalyst A with 400 MHz spectrometer (31at 161.7 MHz) at room temperature (31P MAS NMR). Samples were packed in silicon nitride rotors (Si3N4) and spun at 13 to KHz sample spinning (about 800000 rpm). A 30 degree tip and recycle delay of 15 s were used to avoid saturation. About 4000 to 10000 scans were accumulated to signal average and improve signal/noise ratio. Proton decoupling was not employed. All spectra were doubly referenced to tetramethyl diphosphine disulphide at 37.8 ppm and 85% phosphoric acid (run separately in a tube) at 0.0 ppm on the chemical shift scale.



FIG. 1 illustrates 31P MAS NMR spectrum for a P/ZSM-5 zeolite (Catalyst A). The 31P MAS NMR spectrum for Catalyst A shows peaks at 0, −11, −31 and −44 ppm attributed to various P-species such as free phosphorus and phosphorus bonded (via oxygen) to Si and Al.


Catalyst B


Heat-treated, P-modified ZSM-5 (described as Catalyst A earlier) was bound with 20 wt % alumina binder. 19.18 gm of alumina (pseudobohemite type, available from Alcoa, HiQ-40 grade) was peptized with mineral acid (e.g., HNO3) and then mixed with 57.44 gm of P/ZSM-5 zeolite powder (80 mesh). Water was spray added to make a soft paste. The catalyst paste was calcined or heated (as irregular chunks or formed in a cylindrical shape) at 510° C. to 530° C. using the same temperature profile as described for Catalyst A above. The resulting Catalyst B was crushed and sized using 20 and 40 mesh screens for catalytic test.


Catalyst C


Heat-treated, P-modified ZSM-5 (earlier described as Catalyst A) was bound with 20% silica binder. 8.19 gm of Aerosil-200 was mixed with 5.05 gm of Ludox-HS-40 (Colloidal Silica) in which 20.0 ml of 0.2 N NH4OH was added slowly with stirring. 20.02 gm of P/ZSM-5 powder (80 mesh) was added to the silica mixture and stirred well. Water was sprayed to make soft paste and the paste was calcined at 510° C. to 530° C. using the same temperature profile as described for catalyst A above. The resulting Catalyst C was crushed and sized using 20 and 40 mesh screens for catalytic tests.


Catalyst D


Catalyst A was bound with 20% aluminum phosphate. Catalyst A was bound with aluminum phosphate, available from Aldrich Chemicals, as a binder following the same procedure as described for Catalyst B. The resulting Catalyst D was crushed and sized using 20 and 40 mesh screens for catalytic test.


Catalyst E


Catalyst A was bound with 20% kaolin. P/ZSM-5 was bound with kaolin as binder following the same procedure as described for Catalyst B. Kaolin (aluminum silicate hydroxide), available from Aldrich Chemicals, was used. The resulting Catalyst E was crushed and sized using 20 and 40 mesh screens for catalytic test.


Examples 1-5

In Examples 1-5, Catalysts A-E were used in toluene methylation. The reactions were each carried out in a fixed bed, continuous flow type reactor. In each case, a catalyst charge of 5.4 ml (catalyst size: 20-40 mesh) was loaded in the reactor. The catalyst was dried by slowly raising the catalyst bed temperature (about 5° C./min) to 200° C. under hydrogen flow (50 cc/min) for at least one hour. The catalyst was steamed by introducing water vapor (2.2 mmole/min) with a carrier gas of H2 (459 cc/min) at 200° C. overnight. A premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. and the catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased to about 550° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) (based on methylation feed) was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition, water was added to the reactor as cofeed and was vaporized prior to introduction to the reactor. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor pressure was about 20 psig. Reactor streams were analyzed to calculate conversion and selectivity. Liquid product stream analyses and conversion and selectivity for toluene methylation reaction over Catalysts A-E are shown in Table 3 below.











TABLE 3









Catalyst













A
B
C
D
E


EXAMPLE
1
2
3
4
5




















Time on Stream, h
28
118
24
125
22
124
30
150
25
131







Product Analysis, wt %

















Water
20.6
20.3
20.9
21.5
19.2
18.8
19.3
19.2
20.2
19.6


Methanol
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6


Dimethylether
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Benzene
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Toluene
64.4
64.8
65.2
64.9
76.2
76.8
76.5
76.0
69.9
69.5


Ethylbenzene
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


p-Xylene
12.7
12.6
13.3
12.8
2.8
2.7
2.9
3.6
8.3
9.4


m-Xylene
0.9
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.4


o-Xylene
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2


Ethyltoluenes
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
0
0
0


Trimethylbenzenes
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
0.2
0.2


C10+
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0







Conversion/Selectivity, mole %

















Toluene Conversion
15.4
14.6
14.9
13.6
2.6
2.0
2.8
2.7
8.7
9.7


Mixed Xylene Selectivity
97.1
97.1
98.6
98.6
88.5
97.5
100
100
98.1
98.2


p-Xylene Selectivity
89.6
89.6
97.7
97.8
84.8
86.0
93.2
94.3
93.4
94.0


Methanol Selectivity
75.6
72.3
62.9
64.3
29.5
24.9
27.1
27.7
58.0
61.0









Examples 6-8

Catalyst F-H


Using the procedure described for Catalyst A, NH4-ZSM-5 having a SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio of 280 was treated with H3PO4 acid. The H3PO4 acid treated ZSM-5 was then heated at 510-530° C. for approximately 10 hrs. Three alumina bound catalysts were made using the resulting P/ZSM-5 powder with 10 wt % alumina (Alcoa HiQ40) as binder and each was further calcined or heated at different maximum temperatures to form Catalysts F-H. Catalyst F was heated at a maximum temperature of 400° C. Catalyst G was heated at a maximum temperature of 510° C. Catalyst H was heated at a maximum temperature of 600° C. The catalysts were tested for toluene methylation using the conditions described in Examples 1-5. Table 4 shows the liquid product stream analysis and conversion and selectivity for Catalysts F-H for Examples 6-8.











TABLE 4









Catalyst











F
G
H


EXAMPLE
6
7
8
















Time on Stream, h
24
143
23
125
24
120







Product Analysis, wt %













Water
21.0
21.5
21.0
20.8
21.1
20.5


Methanol
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2


Dimethylether
0
0
0
0
0
0


Benzene
0
0
0
0
0
0


Toluene
64.6
63.5
65.2
65.6
65.1
65.9


Ethylbenzene
0
0
0
0
0
0


p-Xylene
13.7
14.2
12.8
12.6
13.2
13.0


m-Xylene
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2


o-Xylene
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1


Ethyltoluenes
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1


Trimethylbenzenes
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1


C10+
0
0
0
0
0
0







Conversion/Selectivity, mole %













Toluene Conversion
14.7
14.7
13.8
13.4
13.4
13.4


Mixed Xylene Selectivity
98.3
98.2
98.2
98.2
98.6
98.5


p-Xylene Selectivity
96.9
96.9
95.7
95.8
98.2
98.2


Methanol Selectivity
65.6
65.8
64.0
63.4
60.7
64.4









Examples 9-11

Catalysts I-K


Using the procedure described for Catalyst A, NH4-ZSM-5 having a SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio of 280 was treated with H3PO4 acid. The H3PO4 acid treated ZSM-5 was then heated at different temperatures of 90° C., 250° C. or 320° C. The heat-treated, P-modified ZSM-5 zeolite powder was then combined with 20 wt % alumina (Alcoa HiQ40) following the same procedure described for Catalyst B, and was calcined or heated at a maximum temperature of from 510 to 530° C. These bound catalysts, designated as Catalysts I, J and K, were tested for toluene methylation using the conditions described for Examples 1-5. The 31P MAS NMR spectra for Catalysts I and K are shown in FIG. 2. The 31P MAS NMR spectrum for Catalyst I shows only a single peak at around −30 ppm with a long tail (FIG. 2 spectrum a). As the heating temperature is increased for the P/ZSM-5 (used prior to binding with alumina) to about 300° C. or higher, the final bound catalyst may show additional peak(s), including a peak at around −44 ppm (see, for example, spectrum b of FIG. 2 and spectrum b of FIG. 3). Table 5 summarizes the initial heating temperature of the unbound P/ZSM-5 and catalytic test results obtained for bound Catalysts I-K. Also, the data for Catalyst B reproduced from Table 3 is presented in Table 5 for comparison. Those catalysts made from the P-modified ZSM-5 zeolite that were heated at a temperature of 300° C. or higher and then bound with a suitable binder showed 90% or higher p-xylene selectivity for toluene methylation.











TABLE 5









Catalyst












I
J
K
B









P/ZSM-5 Heating Temp1












90° C.
250° C.
320° C.
520° C.


EXAMPLE
9
10
12
2


















Time on
23
126
54
150
24
126
24
125


Stream, h







Product Analysis, wt %















Water
21.0
21.0
20.9
21.7
21.1
21.6
20.9
21.5


Methanol
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2


Dimethylether
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Benzene
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
0


Toluene
63.4
63.0
63.8
62.3
65.8
64.0
65.2
64.9


Ethylbenzene
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


p-Xylene
12.1
13.3
12.5
13.1
12.7
14.0
13.3
12.8


m-Xylene
2.2
1.8
2.3
1.7
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


o-Xylene
0.8
0.7
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1


Ethyltoluenes
0
0
0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1


Trimethyl-
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0
0
0.1
0.1


benzenes


C10+
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0







Conversion/Selectivity, mole %















Toluene
16.2
16.6
15.6
16.4
13.2
14.6
14.9
13.6


Conversion


Mixed Xylene
96.7
97.7
96.4
97.2
98.6
99.2
98.6
98.6


Selectivity


p-Xylene
80.0
84.6
84.1
84.7
98.2
98.4
97.7
97.8


Selectivity


Methanol
69.7
72.1
67.9
70.8
58.3
64.6
62.9
64.3


Selectivity






1Maximum temperature at which P/ZSM-5 was heated prior to binding with alumina.







For comparison purposes, the conversion and selectivity data shown in Table 5 was averaged, and those observed for Catalyst I were scaled to 1.00 and then were compared with other catalysts on a relative scale. As shown in Table 6, with the increase of the first heating temperature of the phosphorus-treated ZSM-5 prior to combining the zeolite with a binder, the p-xylene selectivity increased with a decrease in toluene conversion.











TABLE 6









Catalyst












I
J
K
B















P/ZSM-5 Heating Temperature, ° C.1
90
250
320
520


Relative Activity2
1.00
0.98
0.85
0.87


Relative Para-Selectivity2
1.00
1.02
1.19
1.19






1Maximum temperature at which P/ZSM-5 was heated prior to binding with alumina.




2Average of two data points shown in Table 1 and 5 for the respective catalyst. Activity and selectivity observed on catalyst I were scaled to 1.00 and then compared with those obtained on other catalysts.







As can be seen, the P/ZSM-5 zeolite that was heated at a temperature of about 300° C. or above, and then bound with alumina followed by calcinations or heating at 500° C. above showed increased shape selectivity producing p-xylene selectively for toluene methylation. Higher activity with decreased p-selective catalyst can be achieved by heating the P/ZSM-5 at 300° C. or less and binding with alumina and calcining or heating at 500° C. or higher.


Examples 12-13

Catalyst L and M


Using the procedure described for Catalyst A, an NH4-ZSM-5 zeolite (SiO2/Al2O3 mole ratio 280) was treated with H3PO4 and then heated at a maximum temperature of 550° C. Analyses of the P-treated ZSM-5 zeolite powder, as was carried out for Catalyst A, are shown in Tables 7 and 8. The 31P MAS NMR of the P/ZSM-5 zeolite is shown in FIG. 3 (spectrum a). The P/ZSM-5 showed similar properties to those of Catalyst A. The P/ZSM-5 zeolite was bound with 20% alumina (pseudobohemite type) and extruded to make 1/16-inch cylindrical shape catalyst. Alcoa alumina grades HiQ-40 and HiQ-10 were used for Catalyst L and M, respectively. Catalysts L and M were calcined or heated at a maximum temperature between 510° C. and 530° C. FIG. 3 shows a 31P MAS NMR spectrum (spectrum b) for an alumina bound catalyst—Catalyst M. The 31P MAS NMR spectrum for Catalyst M shows two strong peaks at around −13 ppm (broad peak) and −44 ppm. This differs significantly from the 31P MAS NMR spectrum for Catalyst I, as shown in FIG. 2 (spectrum a).











TABLE 7







Elemental Analysis, wt %
N2 Adsorption













Si
Al
P
SA, m2/g
PV, ml/g

31P MAS NMR






35.38
0.30
9.72
188
0.15
See spectrum







a in FIG. 3
















TABLE 8







Powder XRD Intensity*










d-spacing [A]
Intensity














11.08
100



9.99
54



9.89
46



9.70
17



8.01
6



6.54
7



6.33
9



5.98
16



5.70
6



5.55
8



4.25
6



4.00
7



3.84
57



3.80
27



3.71
28



3.64
11



3.53
18



2.98
10



2.78
6







*Intensities shown are scaled in arbitrary units so that most intense peak is 100.






Catalyst L and M were tested for toluene methylation. The reactor, catalyst charge, catalyst drying and steaming procedure were the same as described in Examples 1-5, and the reaction conditions were the same as in Examples 1-5. Reactor liquid product stream analysis and conversion and selectivity for Catalysts L and M are shown in Tables 9 and 10, respectively. Under the reaction conditions used for toluene methylation, Catalysts L and M showed initial 14% toluene conversion (63% of theoretical maximum) with greater than 98% mixed-xylene and 96% p-xylene selectivity.










TABLE 9






Catalyst



L


Example
12






















Time on Stream, h
24
48
78
150
198
246
318







Product Analysis, wt %














Water
20.6
20.9
22.0
20.5
20.8
20.0
19.8


Methanol
0
0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1


Dimethylether
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Benzene
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Toluene
65.5
65.1
63.9
65.9
65.6
66.1
66.4


Ethylbenzene
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


p-Xylene
13.1
13.2
13.3
12.8
12.8
13.1
13.0


m-Xylene
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


o-Xylene
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2


Ethyltoluenes
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1


Trimethylbenzenes
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0
0.2
0.2


C10+







Conversion/Selectivity, mole %














Toluene Conversion
14.0
14.2
14.3
13.3
13.4
13.7
13.5


Mixed Xylene
98.4
98.4
98.3
98.3
98.4
98.3
98.3


Selectivity


p-Xylene Selectivity
96.2
96.2
96.3
96.3
96.3
96.5
96.5


Methanol Selectivity
62.3
63.1
64.7
61.8
62.0
63.0
61.8

















TABLE 10






Catalyst



M


Example
13






















Time on Stream, h
24
54
126
150
173
293
313







Product Analysis, wt %














Water
20.3
20.5
19.9
19.9
21.2
20.4
20.4


Methanol
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2


Dimethylether
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Benzene
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


Toluene
66.0
65.4
65.9
65.8
64.6
65.5
65.8


Ethylbenzene
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


p-Xylene
12.9
13.2
13.3
13.4
13.2
13.1
12.8


m-Xylene
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


o-Xylene
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


Ethyltoluenes
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1


Trimethylbenzenes
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


C10+
0
0
0
0
0
0
0







Conversion/Selectivity, mole %














Toluene Conversion
13.6
13.9
13.9
13.8
14.1
13.8
13.6


Mixed Xylene
98.2
98.3
98.3
98.3
98.3
98.3
98.3


Selectivity


p-Xylene Selectivity
96.6
96.6
96.6
96.7
97.0
97.0
96.7


Methanol Selectivity
63.3
64.9
65.5
66.1
67.9
67.0
65.6









Example 14

Catalyst L was further tested for catalyst stability in toluene methylation reaction. The reactor and feed conditions were the same as those described in Examples 1-5. After drying the catalyst at 200° C., the catalyst was steamed overnight at 200° C. A premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) (based on methylation feed) was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed of H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition to H2, water vapor was added to reactor as cofeed. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor pressure was about 20 psig. The catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased slowly to about 510° C. over a period of time to give toluene conversion of about 14%, and no reactor temperature adjustment was made during the test period of 637 h (26 days). Toluene conversion, and selectivities to mixed xylene, p-xylene and methanol are shown in FIGS. 4 and 5.


Example 15

Catalyst M was further employed to show stable catalytic performances for toluene methylation reaction. The reactor, catalyst charge, catalyst drying and steaming procedure were the same described for Examples 1-5. After drying the catalyst at 200° C., the catalyst was steamed overnight at about 200° C. A premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) (based on methylation feed) was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed of H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition to H2, water vapor was added to reactor as cofeed. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and reactor pressure was about 20 psig. The catalyst bed inlet temperature was increased slowly to 535° C. over a period of time to give toluene conversion of about 14%, and no further reactor temperature adjustment was made during the test period of 1560 h (64 days). Toluene conversion, and selectivities to mixed xylene, p-xylene and methanol are shown in FIGS. 6 and 7.


Example 16

Catalyst A was employed to test its stable activity for toluene methylation. The reactor, feed composition, catalyst drying and steaming conditions were the same as described for Examples 1-5. After drying the catalyst at 200° C., the catalyst was steamed overnight at 200° C. A premixed toluene and methanol feed (molar ratio 4.5) was added to the reactor at 200° C. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) (based on methylation feed) was maintained at about 2 hr−1 and a cofeed H2 gas was fed and maintained to provide a H2/methylation feed molar ratio of about 7-8. In addition, water was added to the reactor as cofeed and was vaporized prior to introduction into the reactor. The H2O/methylation feed molar ratio was about 0.8 and the reactor pressure was about 20 psig. The catalyst bed inlet temperature was slowly raised to 492° C. when a toluene conversion of about 14% was obtained and when no further reactor temperature adjustment was made during the test period. Reactor streams were analyzed to calculate conversion and selectivity. FIG. 8 shows steady toluene conversion as a function of time on stream. The unbound P/ZSM-5 catalyst (Catalyst A) showed stable performance during the test period of 726 hours (30 days). Table 11 presents the average toluene conversion, methanol selectivity, mixed-xylene selectivity and p-xylene selectivity for Catalysts A, L and M. Contrasted to the unbound P/ZSM-5 (Catalyst A), the alumina bound catalysts showed at least 5% increased p-xylene selectivity.











TABLE 11









Conversion/Selectivity, mole %











Catalyst L
Catalyst M
Catalyst A



Example 14
Example 15
Example 16














Toluene Conversion
14.6
14.4
14.6


Mixed-Xylene Selectivity
98.1
97.9
96.8


p-Xylene Selectivity
96.7
94.8
88.0


Methanol Selectivity
65.7
70.0
67.7








Claims
  • 1. A method of preparing a zeolite catalyst comprising: treating a zeolite with a phosphorus compound to form a phosphorus-treated zeolite;heating the phosphorus-treated zeolite to a temperature of about 300° C. or higher;combining the phosphorus-treated zeolite with an inorganic oxide binder material to form a zeolite-binder mixture; andheating the zeolite-binder mixture at temperature of about 400° C. or higher to form a bound zeolite catalyst.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein: the binder material includes at least one of alumina, clay, aluminum phosphate and silica-alumina.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein: the binder material is an alumina-containing material.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite is heated to a temperature of from about 300° C. to about 600° C.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein: the zeolite-binder mixture is heated to a temperature of from 400° C. to about 700° C.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein: the zeolite is a ZSM-5 zeolite.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein: the binder material contains from about 1% to 99% by weight alumina.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein: the bound zeolite catalyst exhibits at least two 31P MAS NMR peaks with maxima at from about 0 to about −55 ppm, with at least one peak having a maximum at from about −40 to about −50 ppm.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein: the binder material is present in an amount of from about 1% to about 99% by weight of the bound zeolite catalyst.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein: the zeolite contains 10-oxygen ring pores.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising: steaming the bound zeolite at a temperature of 300° C. or less.
  • 12. The zeolite catalyst prepared by the method of claim 1.
  • 13. A method of preparing a zeolite catalyst comprising: treating a zeolite with a phosphorus compound to form a phosphorus-treated zeolite having a phosphorus content of from 0.01 to about 0.15 gram of phosphorus per gram of zeolite.heating the phosphorus-treated zeolite to a temperature of from about 300° C. to about 600° C.;combining the phosphorus-treated zeolite with an alumina or clay binder material to form a zeolite-binder mixture; andheating the zeolite-binder mixture at temperature of from about 400° C. to about 700° C. to form a bound zeolite catalyst.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein: the zeolite is a ZSM-5 zeolite.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein: the binder material contains from about 1% to 99% by weight alumina or clay or their combinations.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein: the bound zeolite catalyst exhibits at least two 31P MAS NMR peaks with maxima at from about 0 to about −55 ppm, with at least one peak having a maximum at from about −40 to about −50 ppm.
  • 17. The method of claim 13, wherein: the binder material is present in an amount of from about 1% to about 99% by weight of the bound zeolite catalyst.
  • 18. The method of claim 13, wherein: the zeolite contains 10-oxygen ring pores.
  • 19. The method of claim 13, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite has a phosphorus content of from 0.07 to about 0.12 gram of phosphorus per gram of zeolite.
  • 20. The method of claim 13, further comprising: steaming the bound zeolite at a temperature of 300° C. or less.
  • 21. The zeolite catalyst prepared by the method of claim 13.
  • 22. A zeolite catalyst prepared by treating a zeolite with a phosphorus compound to form a phosphorus-treated zeolite, heating the phosphorus-treated zeolite to a temperature of about 300° C. or higher, combining the phosphorus-treated zeolite with an inorganic oxide binder material to form a zeolite-binder mixture, and heating the zeolite-binder mixture at temperature of about 400° C. or higher to form a bound zeolite catalyst.
  • 23. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the binder material includes at least one of alumina, clay, aluminum phosphate and silica-alumina.
  • 24. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the binder material is an alumina-containing material.
  • 25. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the phosphorus-treated zeolite is heated to a temperature of from about 300° C. to about 600° C.
  • 26. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the zeolite-binder mixture is heated to a temperature of from 400° C. to about 700° C.
  • 27. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the zeolite is a ZSM-5 zeolite.
  • 28. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the binder material contains from about 1% to 99% by weight alumina.
  • 29. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the bound zeolite catalyst exhibits at least two 31 P MAS NMR peaks with maxima at from about 0 to about −55 ppm, with at least one peak having a maximum at from about −40 to about −50 ppm.
  • 30. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the binder material is present in an amount of from about 1% to about 99% by weight of the bound zeolite catalyst.
  • 31. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the zeolite contains 10-oxygen ring pores.
  • 32. The catalyst of claim 22, wherein: the bound zeolite is steamed at a temperature of 300° C. or less.
US Referenced Citations (194)
Number Name Date Kind
3702886 Argauer et al. Nov 1972 A
3962364 Young Jun 1976 A
3965207 Weinstein Jun 1976 A
4115424 Unland et al. Sep 1978 A
4140726 Unland et al. Feb 1979 A
4152364 Chu May 1979 A
4250345 Chu Feb 1981 A
4278827 Chu et al. Jul 1981 A
4409132 Forbus et al. Oct 1983 A
RE31919 Butter et al. Jun 1985 E
4548914 Chu Oct 1985 A
4554394 Forbus et al. Nov 1985 A
4590321 Chu May 1986 A
4623530 Cullo et al. Nov 1986 A
4623533 Young Nov 1986 A
4638106 Pieters et al. Jan 1987 A
4665251 Chu May 1987 A
4670616 De Simone et al. Jun 1987 A
4673767 Nimry et al. Jun 1987 A
4694114 Chu et al. Sep 1987 A
4695666 Chao et al. Sep 1987 A
4695667 Sumitani et al. Sep 1987 A
4704495 Dessau Nov 1987 A
4716135 Chen Dec 1987 A
4721827 Cullo et al. Jan 1988 A
4727209 Chao Feb 1988 A
4746763 Kocal May 1988 A
4758328 Young Jul 1988 A
4761513 Steacy Aug 1988 A
4781815 Pellet et al. Nov 1988 A
4847223 Le Van Mao et al. Jul 1989 A
4861930 Cottrell et al. Aug 1989 A
4873067 Valyocsik et al. Oct 1989 A
4891197 Derouane et al. Jan 1990 A
4891467 Sikkenga Jan 1990 A
4902406 Valyocsik Feb 1990 A
4912073 Chu Mar 1990 A
4914067 Pellet et al. Apr 1990 A
4935574 D'Amore et al. Jun 1990 A
4962255 Fraenkel et al. Oct 1990 A
4973399 Green et al. Nov 1990 A
4973781 Valyocsik et al. Nov 1990 A
4980052 Green et al. Dec 1990 A
5041402 Casci et al. Aug 1991 A
5043502 Martindale et al. Aug 1991 A
5047141 Chu Sep 1991 A
5068483 Barthomeuf et al. Nov 1991 A
5094995 Butt et al. Mar 1992 A
5105047 Waller Apr 1992 A
5108579 Casci Apr 1992 A
5110776 Chitnis et al. May 1992 A
5124299 Waller Jun 1992 A
5171921 Gaffney et al. Dec 1992 A
5173461 Absil et al. Dec 1992 A
5178748 Casci et al. Jan 1993 A
5210356 Shamshoum et al. May 1993 A
5227558 Shamshoum et al. Jul 1993 A
5231064 Absil et al. Jul 1993 A
5233102 Butt et al. Aug 1993 A
5246688 Faust et al. Sep 1993 A
5248841 Young Sep 1993 A
5254767 Dwyer Oct 1993 A
5254770 Olson et al. Oct 1993 A
5294332 Klotz Mar 1994 A
5294578 Ho et al. Mar 1994 A
5315033 Butt et al. May 1994 A
5318696 Kowalski Jun 1994 A
5321183 Chang et al. Jun 1994 A
5336478 Dwyer et al. Aug 1994 A
5336824 Shamshoum et al. Aug 1994 A
5345021 Casci et al. Sep 1994 A
5348643 Absil et al. Sep 1994 A
5349113 Chang et al. Sep 1994 A
5365003 Chang et al. Nov 1994 A
5366948 Absil et al. Nov 1994 A
5367100 Gongwei et al. Nov 1994 A
5371307 Guth et al. Dec 1994 A
5378670 Kumar Jan 1995 A
5380690 Zhicheng et al. Jan 1995 A
5385718 Casci et al. Jan 1995 A
5387732 Shamshoum et al. Feb 1995 A
5399336 Guth et al. Mar 1995 A
5430212 Butt et al. Jul 1995 A
5430213 Hendriksen et al. Jul 1995 A
5446234 Casci et al. Aug 1995 A
5455213 Chang et al. Oct 1995 A
5456821 Absil et al. Oct 1995 A
5464799 Casci et al. Nov 1995 A
5475179 Chang et al. Dec 1995 A
5498814 Chang et al. Mar 1996 A
5503818 Nicolaides Apr 1996 A
5516736 Chang et al. May 1996 A
5523510 Pellet et al. Jun 1996 A
5534239 Fajula et al. Jul 1996 A
5536894 Degnan et al. Jul 1996 A
5541146 Chang et al. Jul 1996 A
5561095 Chen et al. Oct 1996 A
5563310 Chang et al. Oct 1996 A
5569805 Beck et al. Oct 1996 A
5571768 Chang et al. Nov 1996 A
5573746 Chen Nov 1996 A
5576256 Monque et al. Nov 1996 A
5607888 Chang et al. Mar 1997 A
5607890 Chen et al. Mar 1997 A
5646314 Crocco et al. Jul 1997 A
5648580 Chen et al. Jul 1997 A
5658454 Absil et al. Aug 1997 A
5675047 Beck et al. Oct 1997 A
5689024 Schmitt Nov 1997 A
5698756 Beck et al. Dec 1997 A
5780563 Chen et al. Jul 1998 A
5789335 Chen et al. Aug 1998 A
5811613 Bhat et al. Sep 1998 A
5833840 Absil et al. Nov 1998 A
5847255 Ghosh et al. Dec 1998 A
5902919 Chen et al. May 1999 A
5905051 Wu et al. May 1999 A
5907073 Ghosh May 1999 A
5922922 Harris et al. Jul 1999 A
5925586 Sun Jul 1999 A
5939597 Dessau et al. Aug 1999 A
5951963 He et al. Sep 1999 A
5952535 King et al. Sep 1999 A
5955641 Chen et al. Sep 1999 A
5990031 Ghosh Nov 1999 A
5994603 Mohr et al. Nov 1999 A
6034283 Ban et al. Mar 2000 A
6040257 Drake et al. Mar 2000 A
6046128 Kisen et al. Apr 2000 A
6047544 Yamamoto et al. Apr 2000 A
6048816 Brown et al. Apr 2000 A
6057485 Merrill et al. May 2000 A
6060633 Chen et al. May 2000 A
6074975 Yao et al. Jun 2000 A
6080303 Cao et al. Jun 2000 A
6080698 Zhang et al. Jun 2000 A
6083865 Drake et al. Jul 2000 A
6090274 Wu et al. Jul 2000 A
6090991 Butler et al. Jul 2000 A
6096938 Ghosh Aug 2000 A
6100437 Koehl et al. Aug 2000 A
6124227 Yao et al. Sep 2000 A
6150293 Verduijn et al. Nov 2000 A
6156949 Brown et al. Dec 2000 A
6160191 Smith et al. Dec 2000 A
6187982 Beck et al. Feb 2001 B1
6211104 Shi et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217748 Hatanaka et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222084 Ghosh et al. Apr 2001 B1
6251263 Hatanaka et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255243 Drake et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268305 Butler et al. Jul 2001 B1
6294493 Strohmaier et al. Sep 2001 B1
6300535 van den Berge et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306790 Rodriguez et al. Oct 2001 B1
6317421 Wilhelmsson et al. Nov 2001 B1
6342153 Guan et al. Jan 2002 B1
6388156 Ou et al. May 2002 B1
6395664 Boehner et al. May 2002 B1
6399530 Chen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6423879 Brown et al. Jul 2002 B1
6444610 Yamamoto Sep 2002 B1
6459006 Ou et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469095 Gareiss et al. Oct 2002 B1
6503862 Yamamoto Jan 2003 B1
6504072 Brown et al. Jan 2003 B1
6504074 Berduijn et al. Jan 2003 B2
6506954 Brown et al. Jan 2003 B1
6518213 Yamamoto et al. Feb 2003 B1
6548725 Froment et al. Apr 2003 B2
6566293 Vogt et al. May 2003 B1
6589901 Yamamoto Jul 2003 B2
6613708 Ou et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613951 Brown et al. Sep 2003 B1
6642426 Johnson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6689929 Williams et al. Feb 2004 B2
6699811 Mohr et al. Mar 2004 B1
6723297 Chen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726834 Quesada et al. Apr 2004 B2
6770251 Yoshikawa Aug 2004 B2
6773694 Lesch et al. Aug 2004 B1
6799089 Toulhoat Sep 2004 B2
6811684 Mohr et al. Nov 2004 B2
6812181 van der Berge et al. Nov 2004 B2
6864399 Merrill et al. Mar 2005 B2
20030004383 Brown et al. Jan 2003 A1
20050027151 Ghosh et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050070749 Ghosh et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050154242 Ghosh et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050197245 Ghosh et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209492 Ghosh et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050209494 Ghosh et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050240070 Ghosh et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050277795 Ghosh et al. Dec 2005 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070032690 A1 Feb 2007 US