This application relates to automatically zeroing a target flowmeter.
A target flowmeter configured for bi-directional operation generates a force signal, F, that increases as flow varies from its maximum negative value through zero to its maximum positive value. The value of F at zero flow, F0, must be known with good accuracy in order for the meter to perform well, particularly at low flow rates. The flowmeter is zeroed by establishing the value of F0, usually at the time of installation. F0 may vary as dirt accumulates on the flow-sensing element, as creep occurs in the mechanical elements, and as the force-sensing element, usually a strain gauge, and the electronics, drift over time. Consequently, an automatic zeroing process is useful to maintain the accuracy of the instrument.
The present disclosure relates to determining when flow is equal to or close to zero, and thus conditions are appropriate for zeroing the flowmeter by setting Foff, the estimated value of F0, equal to, or progressively closer to, the current value of F. See the definitions of these and other variables, below. Two methods of detecting zero-flow conditions are disclosed, with the intent that the first be used alone, or that the two be used in combination.
The first method relies on detecting changes in a drag force caused by a moving fluid (e.g., compressed air). When there is no flow past the meter, the drag force on the target element is zero, and thus constant. If there is a very small and constant flow in either direction the flow will be laminar and the force will again be constant. At higher flows, the flow will become turbulent and the turbulence will result in a varying force on the target element. If detectable turbulence occurs at sufficiently low flow rates, the absence of variations in the force can be used as a criterion for determining when zeroing can be applied. Furthermore, even with laminar flows, a change in the drag force is an indication that flow is changing, and therefor present.
The second method relies on the fact that the pressure in most compressed-air systems drops to atmospheric from time to time, in some cases because of nightly shutdowns and in some cases due to periodic maintenance. When a system is at atmospheric pressure there is normally no flow, though there is flow as its pressure drops close to atmospheric pressure and as its pressure rises after the shutdown. As will be seen, by sensing both pressure and changes in force, one can reliably distinguish periods when flow is essentially zero. Zeroing of the meter can be performed during such periods.
All examples and features mentioned below can be combined in any technically possible way.
In one aspect, a system for automatically zeroing a target flowmeter includes a target element that is configured to be placed into a fluid flow and generate an output signal that is related to a sensed force on the target element due to the fluid flow, and a processor that is configured to determine, based on the target element output signal, a condition where the fluid flow is zero or essentially zero, determine a no-flow target element output signal during the condition where the flow is zero or essentially zero, and determine, based on a change in the target element output signal from its no-flow value, a fluid flow rate.
Embodiments may include one of the following features, or any combination thereof. The processor may be configured to determine the condition where the fluid flow is zero or essentially zero further based on a drag force on the target element. The processor may be configured to determine the condition where the fluid flow is zero or essentially zero further when the drag force on the target element is zero. The processor may be configured to determine the condition where the fluid flow is zero or essentially zero further based on variations in the drag force on the target element. The processor may be configured to determine that the fluid flow is not zero when drag force variations are detected.
Embodiments may include one of the above and/or below features, or any combination thereof. The system may further include circuitry for determining, based on the target element output signal, a force signal. The system may further include a temperature sensor that is configured to sense the temperature of the fluid flow in a conduit. The processor may be responsive to the temperature sensor and the force signal. The processor may be further configured to determine a force offset value. The force offset value may include an estimate of the no-flow target element output signal. The processor may be further configured to determine, based on the sensed temperature, a temperature compensation value. The processor may be further configured to incrementally adjust a value of a combination of the force signal, the temperature compensation value, and the estimate of the no-flow target element output signal.
Embodiments may include one of the above and/or below features, or any combination thereof. The system may further include circuitry for determining, based on the target element output signal, a force signal. The system may further include a pressure sensor that is configured to sense the pressure of the fluid flow in a conduit. The processor may be responsive to the temperature sensor, the pressure sensor, and the force signal. The processor may be configured to determine the no-flow target element output signal only when the sensed pressure is within a predetermined pressure range. The predetermined pressure range may be around atmospheric pressure.
Other objects, features and examples will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description and the accompanying drawings, in which:
This disclosure pertains to systems and methods of automatically zeroing a target flowmeter by sensing conditions under which flow is essentially zero and setting the force offset, or the value of the sensed force at no flow, to the force observed under those conditions.
The space within cover piece 104 and surrounding circuit board 107 is filled with a potting material 111 selected to be highly resistant to moisture. This potting material covers the circuit board and the electrical connections to the sensing vane; passage 112 that is open to volume 122 and pipe interior 121 allows fluid pressure in the pipe to reach the pressure sensor.
Protective shield 113 limits the range of movement of vane 106 and reduces the likelihood of damage to the vane by objects traveling with the fluid. Such protective shields are known in the art of flowmeters and so are not further described herein.
We define the following:
The process 400 illustrated in
If the pressure limit is included, the microprocessor compares the current system pressure, P, with the chosen limit, Plim, step 401. If the pressure is above the limit, the microprocessor proceeds to step 403 and sets the counter of successive equal force values, CNT, to zero. If a pressure limit is not included, or if the pressure is below or equal to the limit, the microprocessor compares F with Fp, step 402. If the two are not equal, it sets the counter CNT to zero, step 403 and proceeds to step 409. If they are equal, it increments the counter step 404 and compares it with the limit, (LIM) step 405. If the counter is less than or equal to the limit, it proceeds to step 409. If it exceeds the limit, the microprocessor calculates (F+Ftc−Foff), step 406. If the result is less than zero, it reduces Foff by one count, step 407, and proceeds to step 409; if it is greater than zero, the microprocessor increases Foff by one count, step 408, and proceeds to step 409. If the value is equal to zero, it proceeds directly to step 409. It then sets Fp equal to F step 409, storing F for comparison on the next measurement cycle.
In some applications, F may vary due to electrical noise or vibration and the comparison at step 402 may need to look for agreement within a range rather than exact equality. Such range could be determined by one skilled in the field.
The method need only occasionally detect no-flow conditions; it can fail to detect such conditions often and still work properly. It must not, however, indicate no flow when there is indeed substantial flow.
Case 1: System pressurized continuously, flow stops completely from time to time.
This would be the case when monitoring air leaving a compressor that cycles on and off. With the compressor running, flow would be readily detected from its turbulence; with it off, a constant zero-flow condition would be clear. It would be unusual for there to be leakage flow at this point in the system. Zeroing would be performed based on the lack of flow variation alone, as in the first method described above.
Case 2: System periodically shut down and de-pressurized.
This case would cover systems with night or weekend shutdowns and those with other periodic shutdowns for maintenance that are otherwise run continuously. In this case, the pressure limit would be applied and set just above atmospheric pressure. The meter might be incorrectly zeroed as the system pressure dropped below the limit with some flow still present, but this would be corrected when the pressure reached atmospheric and there was indeed no flow. As the system was filled following the shutdown, the flow would quickly begin to rise and the change in force would be detected, causing the value of CNT to be set to zero and delaying re-zeroing until turbulent flow developed or the pressure was above Plim.
Case 3: Distribution metering with system never shut down.
In this case, the flowmeter would be installed, and powered, well before the system was pressurized, thereby allowing accurate zeroing at the outset.
If the system and method of the present disclosure fails to detect zero flow when there is no flow some, or even much of the time, it will still work properly, because drift is slow, and zeroing need only occur at infrequent intervals.
Once the meter is zeroed, the quantity (F+Ftc−Foff) is a very close approximation to the force exerted by the moving fluid on the vane.
If the fluid is known and can be approximated as an ideal gas, its density, p, can be calculated as:
where R is the appropriate gas constant. The force on the vane varies with the product of a drag coefficient, CD, the density, and the square of the velocity. The velocity can be calculated as:
where C is determined by calibration. Commonly, mass flow is required and the meter is calibrated in overall flow rather than point velocity. Mass flow is given by:
Again, the coefficient A is determined by calibration.
A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that additional modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the inventive concepts described herein, and, accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority of Provisional Application 62/500,260 filed on May 2, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62500260 | May 2017 | US |