Patent Application
20080278262
The present inventions generally relate to microwave filters, and more particularly, to microwave filters designed for narrow-band applications.
Electrical filters have long been used in the processing of electrical signals. In particular, such electrical filters are used to select desired electrical signal frequencies from an input signal by passing the desired signal frequencies, while blocking or attenuating other undesirable electrical signal frequencies. Filters may be classified in some general categories that include low-pass filters, high-pass filters, band-pass filters, and band-stop filters, indicative of the type of frequencies that are selectively passed by the filter. Further, filters can be classified by type, such as Butterworth, Chebyshev, Inverse Chebyshev, and Elliptic, indicative of the type of bandshape frequency response (frequency cutoff characteristics) the filter provides relative to the ideal frequency response.
The type of filter used often depends upon the intended use. In communications applications, band-pass filters are conventionally used in cellular base stations and other telecommunications equipment to filter out or block RF signals in all but one or more predefined bands. For example, such filters are typically used in a receiver front-end to filter out noise and other unwanted signals that would harm components of the receiver in the base station or telecommunications equipment. Placing a sharply defined band-pass filter directly at the receiver antenna input will often eliminate various adverse effects resulting from strong interfering signals at frequencies near the desired signal frequency. Because of the location of the filter at the receiver antenna input, the insertion loss must be very low so as to not degrade the noise figure. In most filter technologies, achieving a low insertion loss requires a corresponding compromise in filter steepness or selectivity.
In commercial telecommunications applications, it is often desirable to filter out the smallest possible pass-band using narrow-band filters to enable a fixed frequency spectrum to be divided into the largest possible number of frequency bands, thereby increasing the actual number of users capable of being fit in the fixed spectrum. With the dramatic rise in wireless communications, such filtering should provide high degrees of both selectivity (the ability to distinguish between signals separated by small frequency differences) and sensitivity (the ability to receive weak signals) in an increasingly hostile frequency spectrum. Of most particular importance is the frequency range from approximately 800-2,200 MHz. In the United States, the 800-900 MHz range is used for analog cellular communications. Personal communication services (PCS) are used in the 1,800 to 2,200 MHz range.
Microwave filters are generally built using two circuit building blocks: a plurality of resonators, which store energy very efficiently at one frequency, f0; and couplings, which couple electromagnetic energy between the resonators to form multiple stages or poles. For example, a four-pole filter may include four resonators. The strength of a given coupling is determined by its reactance (i.e., inductance and/or capacitance). The relative strengths of the couplings determine the filter shape, and the topology of the couplings determines whether the filter performs a band-pass or a band-stop function. The resonant frequency f0 is largely determined by the inductance and capacitance of the respective resonator. For conventional filter designs, the frequency at which the filter is active is determined by the resonant frequencies of the resonators that make up the filter. Each resonator must have very low internal resistance to enable the response of the filter to be sharp and highly selective for the reasons discussed above. This requirement for low resistance tends to drive the size and cost of the resonators for a given technology.
Historically, filters have been fabricated using normal; that is, non-superconducting conductors. These conductors have inherent lossiness, and as a result, the circuits formed from them have varying degrees of loss. For resonant circuits, the loss is particularly critical. The quality factor (Q) of a device is a measure of its power dissipation or lossiness. For example, a resonator with a higher Q has less loss. Resonant circuits fabricated from normal metals in a microstrip or stripline configuration typically have Q's at best on the order of four hundred.
With the discovery of high temperature superconductivity in 1986, attempts have been made to fabricate electrical devices from high temperature superconductor (HTS) materials. The microwave properties of HTS's have improved substantially since their discovery. Epitaxial superconductor thin films are now routinely formed and commercially available.
Currently, there are numerous applications where microstrip narrow-band filters that are as small as possible are desired. This is particularly true for wireless applications where HTS technology is being used in order to obtain filters of small size with very high resonator Q's. The filters required are often quite complex with perhaps twelve or more resonators along with some cross couplings. Yet the available size of usable substrates is generally limited. For example, the wafers available for HTS filters usually have a maximum size of only two or three inches. Hence, means for achieving filters as small as possible, while preserving high-quality performance are very desirable. In the case of narrow-band microstrip filters (e.g., bandwidths of the order of 2 percent, but more especially 1 percent or less), this size problem can become quite severe.
Though microwave structures using HTS materials are very attractive from the standpoint that they may result in relatively small filter structures having extremely low losses, they have the drawback that, once the current density reaches a certain limit, the HTS material saturates and begins to lose its low-loss properties and will introduce non-linearities. For this reason, HTS filters have been largely confined to quite low-power receive only applications. However, some work has been done with regard to applying HTS to more high-power applications. This requires using special structures in which the energy is spread out, so that a sizable amount of energy can be stored, while the boundary currents in the conductors are also spread out to keep the current densities relatively small. This, of course, means that resonator structures must be relatively large.
To our knowledge, the most high-power HTS resonator structures to date use circular disk-shaped resonators operating in a circularly symmetric mode, such as TM010. Some use resonators consisting of a cylindrical, dielectric puck with HTS on the top and bottom surfaces (see Z-Y Shen, C. Wilker, P. Pang, W. L. Holstein, D. Face, and D. J. Kountz, “High Tc Superconductor-Sapphire Microwave Resonator with Extremely High Q-Values up to 90K,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Vol. 40, pp. 2424-2432, December 1992), while other designs just use a circular (or elliptical) disk microstrip pattern on a dielectric substrate (see K. Setsune and A. Enokihara, “Elliptic-Disc Filters of High-Tc Superconductor Films for Power-Handling Capability Over 100 W,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Vol. 48, pp. 1256-1264, July 2000; K. S. K. Yeo, M. J. Lancaster, J. S. Hong, “5-Pole High-Temperature Superconducting Bandpass Filter at 12 GHz Using High Power TM010 Mode of Microstrip Circular Patch,” Microwave Conference, 2000 Asia-Pacific, pp. 596-599, 2000.) In both of these approaches the desired resonance is embedded in a fairly complex spectrum of modes, and there are other resonances that can also exist at frequencies above and below the desired resonance, some of which may be quite close in frequency to the desired resonance. Unfortunately, the lowest-frequency modes tend to have strong edge current densities, which will reduce power handling and unloaded Q values, and they are also very radiative. This causes them to interact with the resonator housing (usually composed of normal metal), which will further reduce power handling and unloaded Q values. Of course, the presence of numerous, nearby resonances in the filter response is a serious problem for many practical applications where solid adjacent stop bands are required. Thus, power handling in HTS resonators is severely limited by current density saturation.
There, thus, remains a need to provide a filter resonator that exhibits a considerable increase in power handling over that of typical HTS resonators, while having minimal unwanted mode activity and achieving very high unloaded Q's.
In accordance with the present inventions, a narrowband filter comprises an input terminal, an output terminal, and an array of basic resonator structures coupled between the input terminal and the output terminal to form a single resonator having a resonant frequency (e.g., in the microwave range, such as in the range of 800-2,200 MHz). In one embodiment, the filter may further comprise another array of basic resonator structures coupled between the input terminal and the output terminal in parallel to form another single resonator having the resonant frequency. In this case, the filter will be a multi-resonator filter.
The basic resonator structures may be, e.g., planar structures, such as microstrip structures, and may be composed of a suitable material, such as a high temperature superconductor (HTS) material. Each of the basic resonator structures may have a suitable nominal length, such as a half wavelength at the resonant frequency. Each of the basic structures may be, e.g., a zig-zag structure. The single resonator may have a suitable unloaded Q, such an unloaded Q that is at least 100,000. The filter may optionally comprise at least one electrically conductive element coupled between at least two of the basic resonator structures.
The plurality of basic resonator structures may be coupled between the input terminal and the output terminal in a manner that characterizes the filter as, e.g., a band-stop filter or a band-pass filter. In one embodiment, the basic resonator structures are coupled in parallel between the input terminal and the output terminal. In this case, the plurality of basic resonator structures may comprise at least three basic resonator structures, and at least two of the basic resonator structures are coupled between the input terminal and the output terminal in cascade.
In another embodiment, the plurality of basic resonator structures comprises a plurality of columns of basic resonator structures, with each column of basic resonator structures having at least two basic resonator structures. In this case, the columns of basic resonator structures may be coupled between the input terminal and the output terminal in parallel. The basic resonator structures in each column may be coupled between the input terminal and the output terminal in parallel or in cascade.
In still another embodiment, the basic resonator array is arranged in a plurality of columns and a plurality of rows, where each of the basic resonator structures has a direction of energy propagation that is aligned with the columns. In this case, the input and output terminals may be coupled to the basic resonator array between a first pair of immediately adjacent rows, and optionally a second pair of immediately adjacent rows, or the input and output terminals may be coupled to the basic resonator array between a pair of immediately adjacent columns.
Other and further aspects and features of the invention will be evident from reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, which are intended to illustrate, not limit, the invention.
The drawings illustrate the design and utility of preferred embodiments of the present invention, in which similar elements are referred to by common reference numerals. In order to better appreciate how the above-recited and other advantages and objects of the present inventions are obtained, a more particular description of the present inventions briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof, which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
a is an electrical diagram of transmission line resonators connected in parallel to create a larger single resonator in accordance with the present inventions;
b is an electrical diagram of transmission line resonators connected in cascade to create a larger single resonator in accordance with the present inventions;
a is circuit diagram of an embodiment of a single-resonator, lumped-element band-stop filter;
b is circuit diagram of an transmission line resonator that can be used to replace the lumped-element resonator of
a is a plan view of a single-resonator, band-pass, microstrip filter constructed in accordance with the present inventions, wherein the measured electrical current distribution within the filter is particularly shown;
b is a plot of the computed frequency response of the filter of
a is a plan view of another single-resonator, band-pass, microstrip filter constructed in accordance with the present inventions, wherein the measured electrical current distribution within the filter is particularly shown;
b is a plot of the computed frequency response of the filter of
a is a plan view of still another single-resonator, band-pass, microstrip filter constructed in accordance with the present inventions, wherein the measured electrical current distribution within the filter is particularly shown;
b is a plot of the computed frequency response of the filter of
a is a plan view of yet another single-resonator, band-pass, microstrip filter constructed in accordance with the present inventions, wherein the measured electrical current distribution within the filter is particularly shown;
b is a plot of the computed frequency response of the filter of
a is a plan view of yet another single-resonator, band-pass, microstrip filter constructed in accordance with the present inventions, wherein the measured electrical current distribution within the filter is particularly shown;
b is a plot of the computed frequency response of the filter of
a is a plan view of another embodiment of a four-resonator filter constructed in accordance with the present inventions; and
b is a plot of the computed frequency response of the filter of
Each of the following described embodiments of filters comprises an array “basic resonators” that are connected together to create an overall resonant structure, so that the stored energy within the resonant structure is spread throughout the array of basic resonators, and the current density in any of the individual basic resonators will not be very large. As a result, the maximum current density within the resonant structure is minimized, so that the overall resonant structure has considerably higher power-handling ability than that of a basic resonator alone.
While the immediate focus herein is a relatively high-power HTS application, thereby increasing the importance of minimizing the maximum current density in the resonate structure, many of the same principles described herein would apply if the objective was to minimize the maximum electric field strength in the resonant structure. In either case, the principle is to spread the stored energy through the overall resonant structure, so that neither the current density nor the electric field strength in any of the individual basic resonators will be relatively large.
Significantly, the use of parallel and cascade connections between basic resonators yields an increase in power-handling proportional to the number of basic resonators used. Because parallel and cascade connections between the basic resonators have different characteristics with regard to introducing spurious modes, it may be desirable to use both types of connections within the resonant structure.
Though other forms of basic resonators may also be attractive, “zig-zag” resonators, which are relatively compact and tend to keep the energy confined to a region close to the surface of the substrate on which the resonators are disposed, are used in all of the embodiments described and analyzed herein. The basic zig-zag resonator structures described herein function much like ordinary half-wavelength resonators. Thus, simple, half-wavelength resonators can be used for studying the maximum currents that are expected to be found in arrays of basic resonators of this type, for a given incident power.
a illustrates a circuit 10a having an array of half-wavelength, transmission-line, resonators 12 (in this case, n=3 resonators) connected in parallel, while
The maximum currents in these two circuits 10a, 10b can be compared at a fundamental resonant frequency f0 for which the resonator lines 12 are a half-wavelength long for a given external Q and for a given incident power. In both cases, the overall combination of n basic resonator lines 12 is seen to function as a single shunt-type resonator.
The resonator susceptance slope parameter b in the parallel circuit 10a of
b=n(πY0/2). [1]
The cascade circuit 10b is essentially a resonator line of n half-wavelengths long, which, because of the increased frequency sensitivity, has the same slope parameter b as presented in equation [1] at frequency f0. Thus, at this frequency, the two circuits 10a, 10b perform in exactly the same way and will have the same external Q (where the external Q is represented by Qe) that is,
Q
e
=b/(2G). [2]
Thus for a given external Q, both circuits 10a, 10b require the same conductance G, and the current at the generators will be simply I=Vg(G/2) at the fundamental resonant frequency f0.
At first, it may appear that the parallel circuit 10a should have a smaller maximum current, because the current at the generator 18 is divided between the n basic resonator lines 12. But this ignores the relative standing-wave ratios in the two circuits 10a, 10b. For the cascade circuit 10b, the standing-wave ratio at the fundamental resonant frequency f0 is given by:
S
b
=Y
0
/G, [3]
while for the parallel circuit 10a, the conductance G of the terminations 14, 16 is divided between n resonator lines 12, so that the standing-wave ratio on the resonator lines 12 is given by:
S
a
=nY
0
/G. [4]
Thus, it can be seen that the electrical current division advantage in the parallel circuit 10a is exactly cancelled out by the increase in the standing-wave ratio on the resonator lines 12. Now, in either case, since the structure is symmetrical, the generator 18 sees a matched load at the fundamental resonant frequency f0, and the generator current will be Ig=VgG/2. This will be the same as the input current to the first resonator line in the cascade circuit 10b, while for the parallel circuit 10a, the input currents to the individual resonator lines will be Ig/n.
Thus, since the conductance G of the terminations is much less than the admittance Y0 of the resonator lines 12 at the fundamental resonant frequency f0, the point at which the resonator lines 12 are connected to the generator 18 will be a current minimum point on the individual resonator lines 12. For the parallel circuit 10a, the current minimum point will be Imin(a)=Ig/n, while for the cascade circuit 10b, the current minimum point will be Imin(b)=Ig. Therefore, using equations [3] and [4] for either of the circuits 10a, 10b, the current maximum is found to be:
I
max(a or b)=Imin(a or b)S(a or b)=VgY0/2. [5]
From this, further analysis shows that, if the maximum current Imax that can be tolerated within an array of n basic half-wavelength resonators operated with a given Qe is known, the maximum incident power that can be handled is:
[6] Pmax=|Imax|2nπ/(4Y0Qe), where in this equation, Imax is taken to be the rms value of the maximum current within the resonator array at the fundamental resonant frequency f0. It is seen that the power handling is proportional to the number n of basic resonators 12 used, and is inversely proportional to the external Q, since larger external Q values require larger standing-wave ratios on the resonators 12.
From the preceding, it can be seen that, as far as power handling goes, there is no relative advantage between parallel and cascade connections. However, the parallel circuit 10a has resonances at only f0 and multiples thereof, while the cascade circuit 10b has resonances at f0/n and multiples thereof. Thus, from the standpoint of minimizing unwanted resonances, the parallel connection is very attractive. However, in practical situations, it may be desirable to use both types of connections in order to make best use of the substrate space, and to prevent the intrusion of what can be referred to as “broad-structure modes” into the frequency range of interest. As will be described in further detail below, these latter modes interfere more as the number of basic resonators connected in parallel is increased. As a result, the number of basic resonators that can be connected in parallel becomes also limited by spurious response considerations.
Although the circuits 10a, 10b illustrated in
x=nπY
0/(2J2) [7]
Analysis of the structure in
Though the analysis of the circuits illustrated in
The zig-zag resonator structure 24 has some useful properties (though not all) of the zig-zag hairpin resonators (see G. L. Matthaei, “Narrow-Band, Fixed-Tuned, and Tunable Bandpass Filters With Zig-Zag Hairpin-Comb Resonators, IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 51, pp. 1214-1219, April 2003). One property is that these types of resonators are relatively small. Another property is that these resonators have relatively little coupling to adjacent resonators of the same type, which makes them particularly useful for narrow-band filters. A very important property for the present purposes is that for zig-zag resonator structures, the magnetic fields tend to cancel above the resonator, and, as a result, the fields are confined to the region relatively close to the surface of the resonator structure. This prevents the fields above HTS resonators from interacting with the normal-metal housing even though the overall resonator array may be quite large compared to the height of the lid on housing. By comparison, large microstrip disk resonators are much more likely to have their unloaded Q degraded due to interaction with the housing (in the case of some modes the resonator can operate like a microstrip patch antenna). In tests on zig-zag array resonators that have been performed so far, using Yttrium Barium Cuprate YBCO superconductor material on Magnesium Oxide (MgO) substrates operating at 77° K around 850 MHz, unloaded Q's well in excess of 100,000 and appreciably higher Q's at lower temperatures have been observed.
Preliminary experiments on the zig-zag resonator structure 24 indicate that it can have appreciably increased power handling if larger spacings 28 are used between the parallel runs 27. However, this will increase the size of the resonator structure 24 somewhat and may cause the fields to extend further above the resonator structure 24 can cause them to interact with the housing walls, which may reduce the unloaded Q of the resonator structure 24.
For purposes of performing experiments and analyses described herein, the zig-zag resonator structure 24 was fabricated or assumed to have a substrate of 0.508-mm-thick MgO (εr=9.7), and a resonator line width and spacing of both 0.201 mm. The overall dimensions of the zig-zag resonator structure 24 were 4.42 mm×10.25 mm (0.174 in.×0.404 in.). The fundamental resonant frequency f0 of the fabricated and assumed resonator structures 24 was approximately 0.85 GHz, although it may vary some from this nominal value for the various connections described herein.
Notably, the description of the following embodiments refers to arrays of basic resonator structures that are arranged in columns and rows. For the purposes of this specification, a column of basic resonator structures is defined as a plurality of resonator structures extending along a line that is parallel to the direction of energy propagation within the resonators, and a row of basic resonator structures is defined as a plurality of resonator structures extending along a line that is perpendicular to the direction of energy propagation within the resonator structures. The description of the following embodiments also refers to top, bottom, left, and right edges of the resonator arrays. In these cases, the top and bottom edges of the resonator array are oriented along a direction perpendicular to the direction of energy propagation within the basic resonator structures, whereas the left and right edges of the resonant array are oriented along a direction parallel to the direction of energy propagation within the basic resonator structures.
It should be noted that, although the nodes at which the input and output terminals 44, 46 are connected to the resonator array 42 (in this case, the nodes at the bottom of the resonator array 42 between the six columns, and in other cases described herein, the nodes at the top, bottom, and/or middle of the array to which the terminals are coupled) are respectively separated by finite line segments (i.e., electrical energy must traverse a single zig of a zig-zag structure to get from one node to the next adjacent one), for all practical purposes, these nodes are essentially shorted together, since the length of these line segments (as compared to length of the entire line of each zig-zag structure) are much less than the wavelength at the resonant frequency.
It should be noted that the filters 30, 40 use a one-line width separation between resonator structures 24, respectively with connections 39, 49 between adjacent resonator structures 24 at the top, bottom, and midpoint of each resonator structure 24. With respect to the filter 40, the resonator structures 24 connected in cascade have their adjacent top and bottom ends butted directly against each other. Recent studies have indicated that it also works well to butt the sides of the cascaded resonator structures 24 directly against each other, so that there are no gaps at all between these resonator structures 24.
Field-solver studies were performed on the band-stop filters 30, 40 using Sonnet Software. Notably, without the connections 39, 49 at the midpoints, it was found that the filters 30, 40 had additional unwanted modes due to resonances occurring between adjacent resonator structures 24. However, the connections 39, 49 added at the midpoints of adjacent resonator structures 24 eliminated these unwanted modes and resulted in resonances equal to f0 and multiples thereof.
In order to experimentally verify the principles of these techniques, four single-resonator test filters respectively having n=1, 2, 4, and 12 of the basic zig-zag resonator structures 24 were designed and fabricated, with coupling giving an external Q of approximately 1000 (a 3-dB stop-band width of 0.1 percent). In order to obtain a sensitive measurement of the power handling of the various filters for the given external Q, the filters were operated in the band-stop mode. Thus, the filters used only one coupling, as is the case with the filters 30, 40. As previously mentioned, the test filters used YBCO superconductor material on 0.508-mm-thick MgO substrates (εr=9.7).
|S1212|dB=20 log10(Qu/(2Qe)). [8]
Notably, as the current density begins to saturate, the unloaded Q and the peak attenuation will decrease. A 1-dB decrease in attenuation (a roughly 12 percent decrease in the unloaded Q) was arbitrarily chosen as a marker for “saturation” (i.e., the onset of nonlinearity). The measured input power values were adjusted slightly to compensate for any deviation of the measured external Q from the desired external Q of 1000. The saturation point is expected to occur at a power level 3-dB higher each time n is increased by a factor of two (as between the n=1, n=2, and n=4 cases) and by about 4.8-dB higher each time n is increased by a factor of three (as between the n=4 and n=12 cases). As can be seen from the measured data, the results are very much as expected.
It is believed that by optimizing the design of the zig-zag resonator structures 24, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,311, which was previously incorporated herein by reference, this power handling can be further improved. It should also be noted that the data in
The unloaded Q's measured at 77° K for the n=1, 2, 4, and 12 test filters were respectively, 151,000, 120,000, 130,000, and 135,000. The corresponding unloaded Q's measured at 60° K were 220,000, 155,000, 170,000, and 240,000, respectively. These high Q's confirm that the test filters are not interacting significantly with the normal-metal housings. The measurements also confirm that the unloaded Q is not a strong function of the number of elements n, and that the variations observed arise more from variations in material quality than filter design.
Notably, Setsune, et al., which was cited above, reports on 2-resonator HTS filters with power handling over 100 W. Although this very impressive level of power handling is orders of magnitude greater than that experienced by the test filters, it is useful to consider, at least qualitatively, possible reasons for this big difference. The response data in the test filters of
Another difference is in the definition of the measurement goals. The definition of saturation used in
|S12|dB=−20 log10(1−Qe/(Qu)). [9]
As has been previously mentioned, the definition of using the 1-dB compression of peak attenuation of a band-stop filter as the definition of the onset of non-linearity corresponds to about a 12 percent decrease in the unloaded Q due to the non-linearity. In the test cases of
Another added factor is that the measured data in Setsune, et al. was obtained using pulsed power, while the measured data in
In order to further understand the potentialities of zig-zag array filters, numerous extensive computer studies of various possible array designs were made. These studies involved computing frequency responses, usually over a number of octaves, in order to assess the spurious response activity of the array filters. Because of the concern that the current distributions might turn out to be very uneven (it is desired that each basic resonator contribute current equally to the array filter), which could substantially reduce the effectiveness of the techniques disclosed herein, extensive data were also obtained on the current distribution in the filters at the fundamental resonant frequency f0. Surprisingly, this concern turned out to be entirely groundless, since the currents in corresponding regions of zig-zag resonator structures throughout the array filters turned out to be remarkably uniform. For example, in the largest array filter that was studied (which had n=64 basic resonators), the variation of peak current density computed for the basic zig-zag resonator structures varied less than 3 percent across the array filter, and most of that variation was at the outermost zig-zag resonator structures on each side of the array filter. This was true in all of the embodiments, which can be attributed to the fact that the zig-zag resonator structures at the edges of the array filter do not benefit as much from the mutual magnetic flux from adjacent zig-zag resonator structures, and therefore, need to have a little larger current in order to produce the needed amount of time varying magnetic flux and back voltage.
The current densities and wide-range responses of the different array filters were computed using the full-wave planar program Sonnet with cell sizes equal to the width of the transmission lines and spaces therebetween. These large size cells were often necessary due to computer memory limitations and the very large size of some of the array filters that were analyzed.
However, using these large cells had another advantage in the case of computing and displaying the relative current densities in the various regions of the array filters. This is because the current density within a microstrip line varies widely between the edges and the center of the line, and if very detailed current density data is to be obtained, it becomes difficult to compare the widely varying current densities in different regions of the array filter. However, if the cells span the line, the current density values obtained are approximately an average over the width of the line.
This makes comparison of the current densities in different regions of the array filter easier, especially in plots where the strength of the current densities in the various regions of the array filter are represented by different colors. Sonnet uses red for the most intense current densities, while, as the current weaken, the colors vary with the rainbow down to blue for the weakest current densities. As seen in grayscale, the corresponding current densities will range from a fairly dark gray for the most intense current densities down to a very light gray or white for the mid-range current densities, on to nearly black for the very low current densities. For all of the array filters discussed below, the plots will be shown with gray scale to indicate the relative current densities at the fundamental resonant frequency f0 throughout the array filters.
Notably, using large cell sizes versus smaller cell sizes appeared to have virtually no effect on the shape of the broadband computed response, but did have a modest effect on the frequency scale. Using the large cells reduced the fundamental resonant frequency f0 by perhaps 2.5 percent. Using large cells also had a small effect on computed bandwidth, which appeared to be negligible for the purposes of the experiments.
It should be noted that although the number n of basic resonators in the array filters described below varies widely, the maximum current density values for all of these array filters are on the order of 30 A/m. It is instructive to consider why this is. The array filters were always operated with terminations that gave an external Q of 1000 (or within a few percent of that value), while the generator voltage was always set to 1 volt. If the resonator susceptance slope parameter for a single basic resonator is b, when using an array of n such basic resonators, the overall slope parameter bn will increase by a factor of n. Then, since Qe=bn/(2G), where G is the conductance of the terminations, it will be necessary to increase G by n in order to maintain the same external Q. Now, the available power of the generator is given by Pavail=|Vg|2G/4, so since Vg is constant, the incident power will also increase by a factor of n. If it can be assumed that the power is always divided equally amongst the basic resonators, then the power seen by each basic resonator will always be the same regardless of the value of n, and the currents in the basic resonators will always be the same. To a very large degree, that is what the results that were computed for the following filter arrays show.
a illustrates a single-resonator, band-pass filter 50 comprising a resonator array 52 having twelve (n=12) of the basic zig-zag resonator structures 24 arranged as six columns coupled in parallel, with each column including two resonator structures 24 coupled in cascade, between an input terminal 54 and an output terminal 56. As can be seen, the filter 50 is similar to the filter 40 illustrated in
Because the input and output terminals 54, 56 are coupled to the top and bottom edges of the resonator array 52, the two resonator structures 24 in each column are connected in cascade. As a result, the filter 50 has resonances equal to f0/2 and multiples thereof. The computed frequency response of the filter 50 is shown in
The current density pattern of the band-pass filter 50 was computed at the fundamental resonant frequency f0, and with a drive voltage of 1 volt and an external Q of 1000. As shown in
a illustrates a single-resonator, band-pass filter 70 comprising a resonator array 72 having twelve (n=12) of the basic zig-zag resonator structures 24 arranged as six columns of resonator structures 24, with each column including two resonator structures 24, coupled between an input terminal 74 and an output terminal 76. As can be seen, the filter 70 is similar to the filter 50 illustrated in
The computed frequency response of the filter 70 is shown in
The current density pattern of the band-pass filter 70 was computed at the fundamental resonant frequency f0, and with a drive voltage of 1 volt and an external Q of 1000. As shown in
a illustrates a single-resonator, band-pass filter 90 comprising a resonator array 92 having thirty-two (n=32) of the basic zig-zag resonator structures 24 arranged as eight columns of resonator structures 24, with each column including four resonator structures 24, coupled between an input terminal 94 and an output terminal 96. As can be seen, the filter 90 is similar to the filter 70 illustrated in
The computed frequency response of the filter 90 is shown in
As further shown in
The current density pattern of the band-pass filter 90 was computed at the fundamental resonant frequency f0, and with a drive voltage of 1 volt and an external Qe of 1000. As shown in
a illustrates a single-resonator, band-pass filter 110 comprising a resonator array 112 having forty (n=40) of the basic zig-zag resonator structures 24 arranged as twelve columns of resonator structures 24 coupled in parallel between an input terminal 114 and an output terminal 116. As can be seen, the filter 110 is similar to the filter 50 illustrated in
The computed frequency response of the filter 110 is shown in
a illustrates a single-resonator, band-pass filter 130 comprising a resonator array 132 having sixty-four (n=64) of the basic zig-zag resonator structures 24 arranged as sixteen columns of resonator structures 24 coupled in parallel, with each column including four resonator structures 24 coupled in cascade, between an input terminal 134 and an output terminal 136. The resonator array 132 is 70.8 mm×41.0 mm (2.79 in×, 1.61 in).
As can be seen, the filter 130 is similar to the filter 50 illustrated in
The computed frequency response of the filter 130 is shown in
The current density pattern of the band-pass filter 130 was computed at the fundamental resonant frequency f0, and with a drive voltage of 1 volt and an external Q of 1000. As shown in
It is apparent that multi-resonator filters using large resonator arrays, as in some of the preceding embodiments, would need to have the resonator arrays placed on separate substrates. We have previously demonstrated a similar approach for low frequency HTS filters, described in Mossman et. al. “A narrow-band HTS bandpass filter at 18.5 MHz” Proc. IEEE Microwave Theories and Techniques Symposium, 653-656 (2000). For example,
The filter 150 further comprises an electrically conductive coupling 166 coupled between the two resonators 158, 160, an electrically conductive coupling 168 coupled between the two resonators 160, 162, and an electrically conductive coupling 170 coupled between the two resonators 162, 164, such that all of the resonators 158-164 are coupled in cascade. The filter 150 further comprises an input connector 172 mounted to the housing 152 in communication with the resonator 158, and an output connector 174 mounted to the housing 152 in communication with the resonator 164.
The filter 150 may optionally comprise a relatively thin plate (not shown) for isolation between the resonators 158, although this may not be necessary if the basic resonator structures used in the resonators 158 are zig-zag structures, which tend to keep the fields relatively close to the substrates.
It is of interest to note that in typical, multi-resonator, band-pass filter designs, the largest voltages and currents occur in the interior resonators, while the voltages and currents may be considerably less in the outer resonators. Thus, it might be feasible to use smaller resonator arrays with different spurious response characteristics at the ends of a filter, and thus, suppress some spurious responses. In this regard, it might be optimum for the outer resonators to have dissimilar characteristics in order to avoid the possibility of a spurious pass-band if there is a resonance in the interior resonators with a transmission phase length of π or a multiple thereof, while the outer two resonators acts as equal coupling discontinuities.
In some cases, only a modest increase in power handling may be needed, so that the resonators need not be very large. Then, it may be feasible to put the entire filter on a single substrate. For example,
The filter 180 has terminations having resistances of 1600 ohms. The filter 180 further comprises coupling capacitors C14 coupled between the bottom of the first resonator 182 and the middle of the fourth resonator 188. In order to bring the first and fourth resonators 182, 188 into proper tuning, the filter 180 also comprises a capacitor C1 coupled between the top of the first resonator 182 and ground, and a capacitor C4 coupled between the top of the fourth resonator 188 and ground. Each of the coupling capacitors C14 has a value of 0.10 pf, and each of the capacitors C1, C4 has a value of −0.046 (to be realized by trimming the resonator). It is interesting to note that the sign of the capacitive coupling between the first and fourth resonators 182, 188 could have been reversed by simply making the connection to the fourth resonator 188 at its bottom instead of at its middle. As can be appreciated, the coupling between the resonators 182-188 is achieved simply by their proximity to each other. The computed frequency response of the filter 180 is shown in
As evidenced by the foregoing, the principles of increasing the power handling of a transmission-line resonator by forming it from an array of smaller transmission-line resonators were explored and successfully confirmed by computations and experiments. The results are quite encouraging, particularly in that the current densities computed at the fundamental resonance frequency in quite large arrays appear to be remarkably uniformly periodic. It was seen that, as far as power handling is concerned, there is no special advantage in using one set of connections over the other (i.e., parallel versus cascade). Regardless of the connections used, the power handling is increased by a factor equal to the number of basic resonator structures used.
Usually, it will be advantageous to use both types of connections in order to minimize the influence of unwanted modes. The basic sources of the unwanted modes are: the harmonic responses of the basic resonator structures, the additional harmonic responses that occur when the basic resonator structures are connected in cascade, and the broad-structure modes that may move down into the frequency range of interest when a sizable number of basic resonator structures are connected in parallel, so that a broad-structure standing wave can occur across the overall width of the array. The more basic resonator structures that are connected in parallel, the lower the first resonance of these broad-structure modes will be.
When employing the zig-zag resonator structure used in this study, if the spurious mode requirements are not too severe, it might be possible to use as many as 9 (or perhaps 10) basic resonator structures in parallel. But this could be increased by a factor of 18 or 20 by using two sets of 9 or 10 basic resonator structures driven in parallel by taps at the top and bottom centers of the array. If the largest array practical for given spurious response requirements is to be used, both the harmonic and broad-structure modes should be analyzed in order to decide on the maximum allowable number of basic resonator structures in cascade in each column of the array and the maximum allowable number of columns in parallel.
It is easily seen that at the resonances for the various modes that are harmonically related to the fundamental resonant frequency f0, the voltage variations are periodic in the vertical direction (as shown in the figures), with alternating positive and negative maximum magnitudes, zero values in between, and with positive or negative maxima at the top and bottom of the array. Further, it is seen that these voltage patterns alternate between odd and even symmetry as the modes increase in order. In the filter 90 of
It is seen that the use of zig-zag structures as the basic resonator is an important feature for ensuring a high unloaded Q for the filters. This is due to the fact that the zig-zag resonator structures cause the files to be confined to relatively close to the substrate even if the overall structure becomes quite large in extent. Thus, even through the resonator array was, in some cases, quite large, there was no evidence of the excitation of modes strongly influenced by the housing dimensions. Also, the fact that the measured unloaded Q's for the test filters were as high as 151,000 when operating at 77° K and as high as 240,000 when operating at 60° K indicates that the fields are not impinging significantly on the normal-metal walls of the housing, which would otherwise drastically reduce the unloaded Q.
It can be appreciated that the techniques described herein should also provide means for obtaining compact filters with moderately increased power handling without being forced to resort to the use of disk resonators that might be quite large. The very high Q of these zig-zag resonator structures and their reasonably good control of spurious responses may result in relatively high-power filters with very sharp cutoffs that can meet some extremely demanding requirements.
Although particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it should be understood that the above discussion is not intended to limit the present invention to these embodiments. It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, the present invention has applications well beyond filters with a single input and output, and particular embodiments of the present invention may be used to form duplexers, multiplexers, channelizers, reactive switches, etc., where low-loss selective circuits may be used. Thus, the present invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents that may fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/928,530, filed May 10, 2007, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60928530 | May 2007 | US |
