Patent Grant
6920745
The present invention relates to a steel cord adapted for the reinforcement of thermoplastic elastomers and to a composite. The composite comprises a thermoplastic elastomer such as polyurethane as matrix and the steel cords as reinforcing material. The steel cord is a multi-strand steel cord, i.e. a steel cord comprising more than one strand.
Steel cords are widely known to reinforce rubber products such as tires and conveyor belts. To a lesser extent, steel cords are also known to reinforce thermoplastic elastomers such as polyurethanes. The adhesion mechanism between the steel cords and the rubber products is substantially different from the adhesion mechanism between steel cords and thermoplastic elastomers. The adhesion between steel cords and rubber is mainly a chemical adhesion based on the bonds created during vulcanization between a conventional copper alloy coating on the steel cord and the rubber. Although chemical adhesion is not excluded between steel cords and thermoplastic elastomers, the adhesion mechanism is substantially based on a mechanical anchoring between the steel cords and the matrix.
Due to this basic difference, steel cords for rubber reinforcement have known another evolution than steel cords for reinforcement of thermoplastic elastomers.
With respect to rubber reinforcement, there has been an evolution towards single-strand cords such as compact cords, lesser filaments in one steel cord (even ending up in single filament reinforcements), thicker filament diameters.
With respect to reinforcement of thermoplastic elastomers, the multi-strand steel cords, i.e. steel cords comprising more than one strand, have remained the standard because the rougher outer surface of such a multi-strand steel cord offers more mechanical anchoring in the matrix than a single-strand steel cord.
Another consequence of the different adhesion mechanism between steel cords adapted for the reinforcement of rubber products and steel cords adapted for the reinforcement of thermoplastic elastomers, is the type of coating applied to the steel filaments. Whereas steel cords for rubber reinforcement, particularly for tires, have a conventional copper alloy coating such as brass, steel cords for the reinforcement of thermoplastic elastomers conveniently have a zinc or zinc alloy coating. Such a zinc coating, however, has its drawbacks.
A first drawback is that a suitable level of corrosion resistance is difficult to combine with an acceptable level of fatigue resistance. Indeed increasing the thickness of the zinc coating leads to an increase of the corrosion resistance, which is an advantage, and to a decrease in fatigue resistance, which is a disadvantage, and vice versa.
A second drawback is that a zinc coating creates a lot of zinc dust and zinc particles during the downstream working of the zinc coated filaments such as the cold drawing and the twisting into the strands and cord.
It is an object of the invention to avoid the drawbacks of the prior art. It is another object of the invention to provide a steel cord with a coating, which has both an acceptable degree of fatigue resistance and an acceptable degree of corrosion resistance.
According to the invention, there is provided a steel cord adapted for the reinforcement of thermoplastic elastomers. The steel cord is a so-called multi-strand steel cord, i.e. the steel cord comprises more than one strand. Each strand comprises two or more steel filaments. At least some of the steel filaments are provided with a zinc coating. The zinc coating has a thickness lower than two micrometer, preferably lower than one micrometer, e.g. 0.5 μm. An alloy layer zinc-steel is present between the zinc coating and the steel.
The typical zinc coating, i.e. a relatively thin zinc coating (common zinc coatings have a thickness greater than 3 to 5 micrometer) in combination with the presence of a transition alloy layer zinc-steel has following advantages.
The thin coating has the advantage of producing less dust of zinc during the downstream drawing and twisting of the steel cord. The decrease in zinc dust and zinc particles at the surface of the steel cord leads to a better mechanical anchoring in the thermoplastic elastomer.
The presence of the transition layer of a zinc-steel alloy between the steel and the zinc increases the corrosion resistance of the steel filaments and increases the adhesion between the zinc coating and the steel. The presence of this alloy layer leads to an even further reduction of zinc dust and, as a consequence, to a better anchoring of the steel cord with the zinc coating in the thermoplastic elastomer.
With respect to the cord core, two alternatives are possible: a cord core in the form of a core strand with two or more filaments and a cord core in the form of a plastic material, e.g. of the same type and nature of the thermoplastic elastomer of the matrix.
Amongst the various constructions tested by the inventors, a 7×7 construction with following parameters has proved to provide excellent results with respect to mechanical anchoring, fatigue resistance, fretting behavior and corrosion resistance:
d1+6×d2+6×(d2+6×d3)
with
The invention also relates to a composite reinforced by a steel cord as described hereabove. An example of such a composite is a belt, e.g. a grooved belt, with polyurethane as matrix
The invention will now be described into more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein
As an alternative, grooves or teeth may also be present in the longitudinal direction of the belt so as to constitute a so-called V-grooved belt (not shown).
The belt 10 has a matrix material 14 out of polyurethane. Other suitable thermoplastic elastomers are thermoplastic polyolefin homopolymers or copolymers, olefinic rubbers, block-copolymers of styrene/conjugated diene/styrene and/or its fully or partially hydrogenated derivative, optionally compounded with a thermoplastic polyolefin homopolymer or copolymer, or blends of the foregoing. Such thermoplastic elastomers are described in more detail in WO-A-99/55793 (Advanced Elastomer Systems and N.V. Bekaert S.A.).
The belt 10 is further reinforced with several steel cords 16, which are lying in parallel adjacent to each other.
Steel cords adapted for the reinforcement of thermoplastic elastomers have, either alone or in combination, following features:
Starting from a steel wire rod with the above-mentioned composition makes a composite product according to the invention. The steel rod is cold drawn to the desired filament diameters. The subsequent cold drawing steps may be alternated by suitable thermal treatments such as patenting, in order to allow for further drawing. Once the final diameters are obtained, the drawn filaments are twisted to a strand, and a number of strands are twisted to a steel cord. Conventional apparatus such as double-twisters (“bunching apparatus) or such as tubular rotary machines (“cabling apparatus) may do the twisting operations. A multiple of the twisted steel cords are then drawn and straightened from supply spools, laid in parallel adjacent each other and fed through insert holes to an extrusion apparatus where the thermoplastic elastomer is added.
Other composite products according to the invention with a parallel and straight pattern of steel cord reinforcement are: sheet-linings, snap-on profiles, cut-resistant flexible and protective strips, handrails etc.
Steel cord 16 comprises a core strand 18 and six outer strands 20. Core strand 18 comprises a filament 22 as core and six filaments 24 twisted around the filament 22. The diameter d1 of filament 22 is at least 5% greater than the diameter d2 of the filaments 24. The outer strands 20 each comprise a filament 26 as core and six filaments 28 twisted around the filament 26. The filament 26 may have the same diameter d2 as the filaments 24. The diameter d2 of filament 26 is at least 5% greater than the diameter d3 of filaments 28.
An example of a preferable construction is (all diameters being expressed in mm):
(0.21+6×0.19)+6×(0.19+6×0.175) (a)
The steel cord filaments are all provided with a thin zinc coating with an average thickness of about 0.5 μm to 1.0 μm.
The table hereunder summarizes the mechanical properties of this cord.
In a belt endurance test with following test conditions:
This cord (a) has been compared with following cord:
(0.20+6×0.175)+6×(0.175+6×0.175) (b)
For cord (b) friction corrosion was visible after 2 150 000 cycles, whereas for cord (a) no friction corrosion was visible after 2 150 000 cycles.
The above steel cord corresponds to the general formula: 7×7. Other suitable steel cord constructions are (subject to the required openness and deformation degree of the outer strands):
On a strand level, the core of each strand 20 is formed by another plastic material 34. Seven outer filaments 28 surround this other plastic material 34.
Here again, the steel cord filaments are all provided with a thin zinc coating with an average thickness of about 0.5 μm to 1.0 μm.
Such a transition layer can be obtained if, in contrast with an electrolytic deposition method of zinc, the steel wire is zinc coated by means of a hot dip operation. In a hot dip operation the steel wire travels through a bath of molten zinc and leaves the bath zinc coated.
If the steel wire leaves the bath vertically, a thick zinc layer is present together with a relatively thick and rough zinc-steel alloy layer. Both the thick zinc layer and the steel-zinc alloy layer have disadvantages. The thick zinc layer produces too much zinc dust and zinc particles during the subsequent drawing and twisting steps. The steel-zinc alloy layer, although increasing the corrosion resistance, is quite brittle and results in a decrease in fatigue resistance.
If the steel wire leaves the bath under a small angle with respect to a horizontal line and if the leaving steel wire is wiped mechanically, e.g. by means of a ceramic cloth, three differences are noticed with respect to the vertical leaving:
All three differences together lead to a reconciliation between the two conflicting requirements of sufficient fatigue resistance and sufficient corrosion resistance.
The reduced thickness of the zinc coating (a) and the reduced thickness of the zinc-steel transition layer (b) leads to an increase in the fatigue resistance.
The presence of the zinc-steel transition layer (b) results in an acceptable corrosion resistance, which is significantly higher than in case there is no zinc-steel transition layer.
The reduced thickness of the zinc coating (a) and the reduction in the roughness of the zinc-steel transition layer (c) leads to less production of zinc dust and zinc particles during the subsequent cold drawings steps. The reduction in thickness of the zinc coating (a), the cold drawing does not lead to more fractures during the cold drawing steps and twisting steps since the brittle transition layer is also reduced in thickness (b) and since the transition layer has a reduced roughness (c).
Table 2 hereunder gives and indication of the difference in fatigue resistance between a reference steel cord {circle around (1)} composed of steel filaments hot dip coated with zinc and leaving vertically the zinc bath and an invention steel cord {circle around (2)} hot dip coated with zinc and leaving the zinc bath under a small angle with the horizontal plane.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00201661 | May 2000 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP01/04447 | 4/19/2001 | WO | 00 | 11/6/2002 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO01/86058 | 11/15/2001 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3778994 | Humphries | Dec 1973 | A |
| 4681558 | Rausch | Jul 1987 | A |
| 5020312 | Watakabe | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5342699 | DeWitte et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5669214 | Kopanakis | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5687557 | De Vos et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5784874 | Bruyneel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5878564 | De Vos et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5993924 | Deroch et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6334293 | Poethke et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 20030000619 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 252 744 | Aug 1992 | GB |
| 2003268686 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| WO9920682 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO9955793 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030106300 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |
