The present invention relates to expandable luggage, and more particularly to expandable luggage having a zipperless expansion system.
Expandable luggage are well known. Many expandable luggage use a zipper expansion system comprising two frames, an expandable section of fabric attached between the two frames, and a zipper running along the perimeter of the luggage between the two frames. In other expandable luggage, the expandable section is located at the edge of the luggage without framing, in which case the expansion is soft. The zipper is closed to decrease the volume of the luggage by pulling together the two frames or expansion fabric and folding the expandable section into the interior of the luggage. The zipper is opened to expand the volume of the luggage by allowing the two frames to move apart and the expandable section to unfold.
The zipper expansion system has several disadvantages. One disadvantage is that the zipper expansion system does not enable a person to adjust the volume of the luggage to intermediate volumes between the zipped closed and zipped open configuration. This is because all of the fabric of the expandable section is loosened when the zipper is opened. Another disadvantage is that the expandable section does not provide a semi-rigid support to protect articles inside the luggage from external forces exerted on the luggage, such as other luggage placed on top of the luggage.
Another type of expansion system comprises two frames, plates attached to the frames, and a locking mechanism. The volume of the luggage is adjusted by sliding the plates attached to one of the frames along rails on the other frame. The locking mechanism is used to lock the plates into place at a desired volume. A disadvantage of this expansion system is that strong external forces exerted on the luggage, such as shock, can break and/or damage the locking mechanism.
Therefore, there is a need for an expansion system that enables a person to adjust the volume of luggage to intermediate volumes depending on the person's travel needs, provides semi-rigid support, and is not prone to break when strong external forces are exerted on luggage.
The present invention provides a zipperless expansion system that overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art.
In one exemplary embodiment, the expansions system comprises an upper frame, a lower frame, an expandable section attached between the upper and lower frames, and expansion mechanisms. Each expansion mechanism comprises an upper member attached to the upper frame, a lower member attached to the lower frame and two arms, wherein each arm is pivotally connected to the upper member at one end and is pivotally and slideably connected to the lower member at the other end. The expansion mechanism further comprises springs for urging the two arms to opposite ends of the lower member and an adjustable fastener for adjustably fastening the upper member to the lower member.
In an expanded configuration, the adjustable fastener is loosened allowing the urging force of the springs to move the arms to opposite ends of the lower member. This action causes the upper and lower members to move apart, thereby expanding the volume of the luggage. In a compressed configuration, the adjustable fastener is tightened to move the upper and lower members closer together against the urging force of the springs, thereby decreasing the volume of the luggage.
One advantage of the expansion system of the present invention is that it enables a traveler to adjust the volume of luggage between the expanded and compressed configurations by using the adjustable fastener to adjust the distance between the upper and lower member. Another advantage is that the expansion system of the present invention provides semi-rigid support for luggage compared to prior art systems that use only an expandable section made of fabric. This is because, after the expansion system has been adjusted to a desired luggage volume, the fastener resists further expansion of the expansion mechanism and the urging force of the springs resists further compression of the expansion mechanism. Another advantage is that the expansion mechanism does not easily break from external forces exerted on the luggage. This is because the expansion mechanism resiliently responds to strong external downward forces by compressing instead of breaking.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description.
Turning now to the drawings,
Turning back to
Each expansion mechanism 25 includes an upper member 30 attached to the interior wall of the upper frame 16 and a lower member 35 attached to the interior wall of the lower frame 18. The members 30 and 35 may be attached to their respective frames 16 and 18 by screws, rivets, bolts or the like. The upper member 30 and the lower member 35 are connected to each other by two arms 40a and 40b. The top ends of the arms 40a and 40b are pivotally connected to opposite ends of the upper member 30. The bottom ends of the arms 40a and 40b are pivotally and slideably connected to the lower member 35. The members 30 and 35 and arms 40a and 40b may be made of plastic, metal, composite material or other rigid material.
The lower member 35 has two elongated slots 45a and 45b. Each arm 40a and 40b has a circular pin 47a and 47b that is slideably received in the respective slot 45a and 45b. The circular pin 47a and 47b allows the arm 40a and 40b to both pivot and slide within the respective slot 45a and 45b. Alternatively or in addition, a pin having the same or different shape may be pivotally connected to the arm 40a and 40b to allow the arm 40a and 40b to pivot with respect to the lower member 35. The lower member 35 also has guiding slots 50a and 50b through which each arm 40a and 40b is inserted into the lower member 35 (see
Each expansion member 25 further comprises two springs 55a and 55b. Each spring 55a and 55b is connected at one end to one of the arms 40a and 40b and at the other end to the lower member 35. The springs 55a and 55b are connected to opposite ends of the lower member 35. This causes the springs 55a and 55b to urge or bias the arms 40a and 40b towards opposite ends of the lower member 35, as shown in
When a downward force is applied to the upper member 30, the arms 40a and 40b move toward the center of the lower member 35 and the springs 55a and 55b are stretched, as shown in
The upper member 30 and the lower member 35 move relative to each other based on the positions of the arms 40a and 40b on the lower member 35. When little or no downward force is applied to the upper member 30, the springs 55a and 55b pull the arms 40a and 40b to opposite ends of the lower member 35. In this configuration, the separation between the upper member 30 and the lower member 35 is maximum and the expansion mechanism 25 expands the volume of the suitcase 10. When a downward force is applied to the upper member 30, the downward force pushes the arms 40a and 40b toward the center of the lower member 30 against the urging force of the springs 55a and 55b. This causes the upper member 30 and the lower member 35 to move closer together and the expansion mechanism 25 to compress, thereby decreasing the volume of the suitcase 10. When the downward force is released, the springs 55a and 55b pull the arms 40a and 40b back to the expanded configuration.
Returning to
The expansion mechanism 25 enables a person to continuously adjust the interior volume of the suitcase 10 between the compressed configuration and the expanded configuration depending on the person's travel needs.
The expansion system of the invention provides semi-rigid support compared to prior art systems that use only an expandable section made of fabric. This is because, after the expansion mechanism 25 has been adjusted to a desired volume, the strap 56 resists further expansion of the expansion mechanism 25 and the urging force of the springs 55a and 55b resists further compression of the expansion mechanism 25.
Another advantage is that the expansion mechanism 25 does not easily break from external forces exerted on the suitcase 10, such as shock. This is because the expansion mechanism 25 resiliently responses to strong external downward exerted on the suitcase 10 forces by compressing instead of breaking.
While an embodiment of the present invention has been shown and described, various modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention, and all such modifications and equivalents are intended to be covered. For example, the structure of the expansion mechanism may be inverted so that the lower member is located above the upper member. Further, the expansion system of the present invention may use any number of expansion mechanisms. For example, the expansion system may use four expansion mechanisms, one on each of the four interior sides of the suitcase. Further, the expansion mechanisms may each have more than two arms and may be attached on the exterior of the suitcase instead of the interior. Further, the luggage of the invention may comprise only one frame, in which each upper member is connected to the border of, e.g., a piece of fabric, a panel, ect., instead of an upper frame or lower frame. Further, although the frames in the preferred embodiment are rigid, one or both of the frames may be made of a soft or semi-rigid material.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
440278 | Payntar | Nov 1890 | A |
587487 | Palica | Aug 1897 | A |
701440 | Wilkinson | Jun 1902 | A |
710037 | Bodwell | Sep 1902 | A |
764144 | McGowan | Jul 1904 | A |
892125 | Bourne | Jun 1908 | A |
1052018 | Spitz | Feb 1913 | A |
1141638 | Hill | Jun 1915 | A |
1573721 | Loeffler | Feb 1926 | A |
1756775 | Frankland-Winning | Apr 1930 | A |
2002878 | Belber | May 1935 | A |
2042288 | Bach et al. | May 1936 | A |
2096768 | Styll | Oct 1937 | A |
2110617 | Wolff | Mar 1938 | A |
2475961 | Hilbert | Jul 1949 | A |
3152833 | Criveling et al | Oct 1964 | A |
3321053 | Doppelt | May 1967 | A |
3410328 | Sasai | Nov 1968 | A |
3450237 | Dyke | Jun 1969 | A |
3504772 | Barry | Apr 1970 | A |
3587795 | Barry et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
4128150 | Popkin et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4294463 | Kotani | Oct 1981 | A |
4356899 | Tawil | Nov 1982 | A |
4610333 | Seynhaeve | Sep 1986 | A |
4733759 | Shih-Chen | Mar 1988 | A |
4756394 | Cohoen | Jul 1988 | A |
4773515 | Kotkins, Jr. | Sep 1988 | A |
4787488 | Campanini | Nov 1988 | A |
4813520 | Lin | Mar 1989 | A |
4844214 | Castelli et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4844215 | Ambasz | Jul 1989 | A |
4846319 | Sadow | Jul 1989 | A |
4854430 | Peterson | Aug 1989 | A |
4953673 | Ambasz | Sep 1990 | A |
5080206 | Tawil | Jan 1992 | A |
5082094 | Nechushtan | Jan 1992 | A |
5088396 | Thomas | Feb 1992 | A |
5307908 | Shyr et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314046 | Pedrini | May 1994 | A |
5358082 | Armstrong, IV | Oct 1994 | A |
5664652 | Shamah | Sep 1997 | A |
5671831 | Chiu | Sep 1997 | A |
5749446 | Hsieh | May 1998 | A |
5819891 | Wang et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6021874 | Nykoluk | Feb 2000 | A |
6022146 | Bull | Feb 2000 | A |
6059078 | Nykoluk | May 2000 | A |
6220411 | Scicluna et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227397 | Kim | May 2001 | B1 |
6305513 | Lu | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6378674 | Lee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390259 | Lu | May 2002 | B1 |
6408997 | Chen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408998 | Saito et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6533087 | Chen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6575272 | Krulik et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591950 | Scicluna | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609598 | Hsu | Aug 2003 | B2 |
20020040834 | Chen | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020125277 | Lim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130004 | Lin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020153216 | Krulik | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020185350 | Chang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030000784 | Hsu | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040035661 | Krulik et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040262111 | Ghiassi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050067244 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0189007 | Jul 1986 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070151820 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |