Patent Application
20230292409
The present disclosure relates to a method of controlling a zone-free induction cooker and a controller for controlling a zone-free induction cooker.
There are two general arrangements of induction cooktops or cookers, which are distinguished by the number and placement of the induction coils. A cooking surface (e.g. a glass surface) is located above the induction coils. Cooking vessels may be placed on the cooking surface where they can be heated by one or more (depending on the arrangement) of the induction coils using electromagnetic induction, as known in the art. Cooking vessels suitable for inductive heating include, e.g., cooking vessels made from or containing ferromagnetic material.
In one arrangement, commonly referred to as a fixed-zone induction cooker, a small number (e.g. four) of induction coils are provided. Each induction coil defines a specific “hob area”. A cooking vessel can only be heated if it is placed substantially in one of these hob areas. This requires a user to be careful with the cooking vessel placement and also limits the number of cooking vessels which can be placed on the cooker.
In another arrangement, commonly referred to as a zone-free induction cooker, many smaller induction coils (e.g. twenty, forty, or more) are provided. The induction coils typically cover the entire cooking surface, meaning that a cooking vessel can be placed practically anywhere on the cooking surface, without restriction to specific hob areas. The cooking vessel will then be heated inductively by whichever one or more (typically more) induction coils above which it is located. Sensing devices, such as optical, capacitive, and ultrasonic sensors, are typically provided for detecting the position of the cooking vessel(s) so that the corresponding induction coils can be powered accordingly.
According to a first aspect disclosed herein, there is provided a method of controlling an induction cooker comprising at least two induction coils for inductively heating cooking vessels, the method comprising: providing a detection signal to a first of said induction coils; providing a detection signal to a second of said induction coils; and measuring a response signal from the first induction coil; and identifying that the response signal from the first induction coil includes an indication of a response signal generated at the second induction coil in response to the detection signal provided to the second induction coil, thereby to determine that a same cooking vessel occupies both the first induction coil and the second induction coil.
This avoids having to provide separate sensing devices, such as discrete sensors and the disadvantages associated therewith, as discussed further below.
In an example, the detection signal provided to the second induction coil is provided at a later time than the detection signal is provided to the first induction coil, and the indication of the response signal generated at the second induction coil is an increase in the amplitude of the response signal from the first induction coil at a point in time corresponding to the time at which the detection signal was provided to the second induction coil.
In an example, the detection signal provided to the second induction coil has a frequency different from that of the detection signal provided to the first induction coil, and the indication of the response signal generated at the second induction coil is a sum of the response signal from the first induction coil and the response signal from the second induction coil.
In an example, the method comprises measuring the response signal from the second induction coil; and wherein said identifying is performed in response to both the response signals being damped. In general, a response signal from an induction coil will be damped due to the presence of (at least part of) a cooking vessel occupying the induction coil.
In an example, the method comprises, in response to determining that a same cooking vessel occupies both the first and second induction coils, assigning the first and second induction coils to the same control zone so that the first and second induction coils are controlled by a single control setting.
In an example, the method comprises: measuring the response signal from the second induction coil; identifying that both the response signals are damped but there is no indication of a response signal generated at the second induction coil in response to the second detection signal, to thereby determine that two separate cooking vessels occupy the first and second induction coils respectively; and, in response to determining that two separate vessels occupy the first and second induction coils respectively, assigning each of the first and second induction coils to separate control zones so that the first and second induction coils are controlled by different respective control settings.
In an example, the induction cooker comprises at least three induction coils, and the method comprises: providing a detection signal to a third of said induction coils to cause the third induction coil to generate a response signal; and identifying that the response signal from the first induction coil includes an indication of a response signal generated at the third induction coil in response to the detection signal provided to the third induction coil, thereby to determine that a same cooking vessel occupies both the first induction coil and the third induction coil.
In an example, the detection signal provided to the third induction coil is provided at a later time than the detection signals are provided to the first and second induction coils, and the indication of the response signal generated at the third induction coil is an increase in the amplitude of the response signal from the first induction coil at a point in time corresponding to the time at which the detection signal was provided to the third induction coil.
According to a second aspect disclosed herein, there is provided a controller for an induction cooker comprising at least two induction coils for inductively heating cooking vessels, the controller being configured so as when installed at an induction cooker to: provide a detection signal to a first of said induction coils; provide a detection signal to a second of said induction coils; measure a response signal from the first induction coil; and identify whether the response signal from the first induction coil includes an indication of a response signal generated at the second induction coil in response to the second detection signal, thereby to determine that a same cooking vessel occupies both the first induction coil and the second induction coil.
In an example, the controller is configured to provide the detection signal to the second induction coil at a later time than the detection signal to the first induction coil, and the indication of the response signal generated at the second induction coil is an increase in the amplitude of the response signal from the first induction coil at a point in time corresponding to the time at which the detection signal was provided to the second induction coil.
In an example, the detection signal provided to the second induction coil has a frequency different from that of the detection signal provided to the first induction coil, and the indication of the response signal generated at the second induction coil is a sum of the response signal from the first induction coil and the response signal from the second induction coil.
In an example, the controller is configured to measure the response signal from the second induction coil; and wherein the controller is configured to perform said identifying in response to both the response signals being damped.
In an example, the controller is configured to, in response to determining that a same cooking vessel occupies both the first and second induction coils, assign the first and second induction coils to the same control zone so that the first and second induction coils are controlled by a single control setting.
In an example, the induction cooker comprises at least three induction coils, and the controller is configured to: provide a detection signal to a third of said induction coils to cause the third induction coil to generate a response signal; and identify that the response signal from the first induction coil includes an indication of a response signal generated at the third induction coil in response to the detection signal provided to the third induction coil, thereby to determine that a same cooking vessel occupies both the first induction coil and the third induction coil.
According to a third aspect disclosed herein, there is provided an induction cooker comprising the controller according to the second aspect and a plurality of induction coils.
To assist understanding of the present disclosure and to show how embodiments may be put into effect, reference is made by way of example to the accompanying drawings in which:
The induction cooker 100 comprises a plurality of induction coils 200 and a controller 300. A cooking surface (e.g. a glass surface) is located above the induction coils 200. Vessels (i.e. cooking vessels) made from or containing ferromagnetic material may be placed on the cooking surface where they can be heated by one or more of the induction coils 200 using electromagnetic induction. An example of a cooking vessel 400 is shown in
The induction coils 200 of the so-called “free-zone” induction cooker 100 are smaller than that of a “fixed-zone” induction cooker. For example, each induction coil 200 may be (much) smaller than a typical cooking vessel. This means that there is no particular or definite hob area and the user is able to freely position each cooking vessel on the cooking surface. The cooking vessel can then be heated by whichever induction coil(s) 200 happen(s) to be located below that position. In the example of
In the example of
The controller 300 is operatively coupled to the plurality of induction coils 200. In operation, the controller 300 controls the power supplied to each of the plurality of induction coils 200 as necessary and thereby controls the amount of inductive heating applied to whatever cooking vessel(s) are present. The controller 300 may be implemented, for example, using one or more processors.
The controller 300 is able to determine, for a given induction coil 200, whether or not there is currently a cooking vessel present on that induction coil 200, as will now be discussed with reference to
To determine whether a given induction coil 200 is currently occupied (has a cooking vessel 400 located over it), the controller 30 probes the induction coil 200 by applying a detection signal 500 to the induction coil 200 and measuring a response signal 501 from that induction coil 200. For example, the controller 300 may drive the induction coil 200 with a known voltage (e.g. a sinusoidal AC voltage) and then observing the resulting current.
A user interface 350 is provided via which a user can provide user input to the controller 300. The user interface 350 may be, for example, a touchscreen or have operable buttons, etc. Compared to a fixed-zone induction cooker, more sophisticated control is required because the vessels may be placed anywhere on the cooking surface, rather than in predefined “hobs”.
To allow the user to vary the heating applied to each cooking vessel 400 separately, the induction coils 200 may be divided into “control zones”. Each control zone is a set of one or more induction coils 200 sharing a common control setting (e.g. a power setting). Ideally, each control zone corresponds to (the base area of) a single cooking vessel 400. The controller 300 may provide an indication of the current control zones to the user (e.g. on a graphical user interface) so that the user can specify a control setting for each control zone. In other words, each control zone is individually controllable by a user.
The control zones may be defined on an ad-hoc basis depending on the location and position of the cooking vessels. In this example, a first control zone A is defined for the first cooking vessel 400a, a second control zone B for the second cooking vessel 400b, and a third control zone C for the third cooking vessel 400c. The first control zone A comprises the induction coils 200 over which the first cooking vessel 400a is located, the second control zone B comprises the induction coils 200 over which the second cooking vessel 400b is located, and the third control zone C comprises the induction coils 200 over which the third cooking vessel 400c is located.
Detection signals 500, as described above in relation to
To avoid this, the controller 300 needs to be able to distinguish between the two scenarios shown in
In
In
A naïve application of detection signals to the induction coils 200a, 200b can allow the controller 300 to identify that induction coils are occupied. However, the response signals from the coils will be damped in both scenarios because there is (part of) a cooking vessel located above both coils. That is, unless other measures are taken, there is no way for a controller to distinguish between the scenario in
Prior art solutions use one or more additional sensing devices for detecting the position of the cooking vessel(s). Examples of such additional sensing devices include optical, capacitive, and ultrasonic sensors. Disadvantages of this include that it creates an additional hardware cost and manufacturing assembly cost. The additional components also increase hardware complexity which may increase the likelihood of failure. Another disadvantage of using such sensing devices is that the determination success rate can be low. This is because both the cooking surface can be thick which reduces the sensor sensitivity and also because the sensing devices are liable to becoming dirty over time as the cooker is used, also reducing the sensor sensitivity.
In examples described herein, a solution is provided which does not require any additional discrete sensing devices (such as optical, capacitive, and ultrasonic sensors as used in the prior art). Instead, the controller 300 provides detection signals to each induction coil 200 which can be distinguished from each other (either because they are supplied at different times or because the detection signals themselves differ from each other in some detectable way) and observes the response signals to identify whether there is an indication of the response signal provided by one induction coil 200 in the response signal received from the other coil 400. Such an indication will be seen only in the case that the same cooking vessel 400 occupies both induction coils 200. This is because, in that case, both detection signals are acting on the same cooking vessel and therefore effectively interfere with each other. When there are separate cooking vessels 400 on each induction coil 200, no such interference occurs and therefore no indication of one detection signal is identifiable in the other response signal.
There are several ways in which the detection signals provided to each inductive coil 200 may be distinguishable or “different”. For the purposes of explanation, an example will first be described in which the detection signals are provided to each inductive coil 200 at different times (i.e. offset from one another in time). Other examples are described later below.
The first detection signal 500a is provided to the first induction coil 200a at time t=0. The second detection signal 500b is provided to the second induction coil 200b at a later time. That is, the second detection signal 500b is offset in time from the first detection signal 500a by a time delay Δt.
In this case, the first response signal 501a and second response signal 501b are each damped sinusoids, indicating that both induction coils 200a, 200b are occupied by a cooking vessel 400. The second response signal 501b is delayed in time relative to the first response signal 501a by Δt.
In this case, the first response signal 501a and second response signal 501b are damped sinusoids as before. However, there is also an indication 550 of the second detection signal 500b in the first response signal 501a. This indication 550 arises because the detection signal 500b provided to the second induction coil 200b acts on the same cooking vessel 400 (i.e. the same piece of material) and therefore changes the response signal 501a as observed at the first induction coil 200a.
This indication may manifest as an additional increase in the amplitude of the response signal 501a. That is, the first response signal 501 is not a simple damped signal, but comprises an additional component corresponding to the second detection signal 500b. That is, the first response signal 501a shows an artefact of the second response signal 501b. This means that the second detection signal 500b applied to the second induction coil 200b has had some effect at the first induction coil 200a. As mentioned above, this is only the case when the same cooking vessel occupies both induction coils 200a, 200b. Hence, the presence of such an indication 550 can be used to determine that the same cooking vessel 400 occupies both the first induction coil 200a and the second induction coil 200b (i.e. to distinguish between a single cooking vessel and separate cooking vessels).
Note that the time delay Δt of the indication 550 relative to the start of the first response signal 501a corresponds to the time delay Δt between the second detection signal 500b and the first detection signal 500a. This is returned to below.
At S900, the controller 300 provides the first detection signal 500a to the first induction coil 200a. This causes the first induction coil 200a to generate a first response signal 501a.
At S901, the controller 300 provides the second detection signal 500b to the second induction coil 200b. This causes the second induction coil 200b to generate a second response signal 501b.
At S902, the controller 300 measures the first response signal 501a from the first induction coil 200a.
At S903, the controller 300 identifies whether there is an indication 550 of the second detection signal in the first response signal 501a.
If there is an indication 550 of the second detection signal 500b in the first response signal 501a, the controller 300 proceeds to S904 in which the controller 300 determines that the same vessel 400 occupies both the first induction coil 200a and the second induction coil 200b.
On the other hand, if there is no indication 550 of the second detection signal 500b in the first response signal 501a, the controller proceeds to S905, where it is determined that it is not the case that the same cooking vessel 400 occupies both the first induction coil 200a and second induction coil 200b.
It is appreciated that the method of
For example, the controller 300 may additionally measure the second response signal 501b and only perform the identifying at S903 if both the first response signal 501a and second response signal 501b are damped. This is advantageous because if one (or both) of the response signals 501a, 501b are not damped, then there is no cooking vessel 400 present on the respective induction coil(s) and therefore the controller 300 can rule out the possibility that a single cooking vessel 400 occupies both induction coils 200a, 200b without needing to identify presence or absence of the indication 550 as described above.
In general, the controller 300 may provide a respective detection signal 500 and measure a respective response signal 501 from any induction coils 200 present. Any induction coils 200 that provide a damped response signal 501 can be determined to by occupied by (part of) a cooking vessel 400. The controller 300 can additionally analyse the response signal(s) 501 to identify which induction coil(s) 200 interfere with which other induction coil(s) 200 and use this to determine the location of the cooking vessel(s) 400 on the cooking surface, as described above. In particular, the controller 300 can identify a border between two adjacent cooking vessels 400 if two adjacent induction coils 200 provide damped response signals 501 but there is no indication 550 of another response signal 501 being present in either response signal 501.
Once the controller 300 has determined the location of the cooking vessel(s) 400, it can provide appropriate control options to the user. To continue the example above, the controller may automatically provide a single control setting for both the first induction coil 200a and second induction coil 200b in response to determining that a same vessel 400 occupies both the induction coils 200a, 200b, and automatically provide separate control settings for the first induction coil 200a and the second induction coil 200b in response to determining that two separate cooking vessels 400 occupy the induction coils 200a, 200b.
A real-world induction cooker 100 may comprise many induction coils 200 rather than the two in the simplified example described above. In such cases, there is the possibility of ambiguity between precisely which two (or more) induction coils 200 a single cooking vessel 400 is occupying. In examples, the controller 300 can also identify which adjacent induction coil 400 this is by leveraging a property (such as the time delay) of the detection signals 500 provided to each induction coil 400.
Consider an induction cooker 100 comprising three induction coils 200a, 200b, 200c, for example, where: the first induction coil 200a is adjacent the second induction coil 200b and the third induction coil 200c; and the second induction coil 200b and third induction coil 200c are not adjacent one another.
In this arrangement, the controller 300 may provide a respective detection signal 500 to each induction coil 200 with a different time delay. For example, the controller 300 may provide a first detection signal to the first induction coil 200a at time t=0 ms, a second detection signal to the second induction coil 200b at time t=10 ms, and a third detection signal to the third induction coil 200c at time t=20 ms.
Then, when the controller 300 measures the response signal from the first induction coil 200a, it can determine the delay between the start of the response signal and the indication 550. If the delay is around 10 ms, then the controller 300 determines that the cooking vessel 400 occupying the first induction coil 200a is also occupying the second induction coil 200b. If instead the delay is around 20 ms, then the controller 300 determines that the cooking vessel 400 occupying the first induction coil 200a is also occupying the third induction coil 200c. If there are two indications, at 10 ms and 20 ms respectively, then then the controller 300 determines that the cooking vessel 400 occupying the first induction coil 200a is also occupying both the second induction coil 200b and the third induction coil 200c.
Similar principles hold for induction cookers 100 comprising any number of induction coils 200. In a naïve example, each induction coil 200 may be driven with its own unique time delay. This is certainly sufficient to allow the controller 300 to distinguish between indications 550 of each detection signal 500. However, fewer different time delays can be used, depending on the layout of the induction coils 200. This is because, in particular, if the controller 300 detects cooking vessels 400 which are located on induction coils 200 which are non-adjacent (e.g. far apart), then it can be assumed that these are not the same cooking vessel 400. This means that the same detection signal (having the same property, e.g. time delay, frequency (see further below), etc.) can be used for both these induction coils 200. In general, only different detection signals 500 are required for the nearest neighbours to a given induction coil 200.
As shown in
As mentioned earlier above, there are other ways in which the detection signals provided to each inductive coil 200 may be “different” or otherwise distinguishable. In general, any property of the detection signal which is detectable in the response from an adjacent induction coil 200 when the same cooking vessel 400 is present may be used. For example, the detection signals may have different frequencies, and/or may be modulated in some manner (e.g. amplitude modulation, frequency modulation, pulse width modulation), e.g. to embed a different code into each detection signal 500. In such cases, the first response signal 501a is modulated by the second response signal 501b (if the cooking vessel 400 is over both induction coils 200, and not otherwise). That is, the first response signal 501a shows an artefact of the second response signal 501b.
Similar considerations to those described above in relation to
As a specific example, with reference to
For example, when two different but similar frequencies are used for different detection signals 500, the controller 300 may identify a beat frequency in the response signal 501 and then determine that the cooking vessel 400 overlaps with the other induction coil 200 which was provided with the detection signal 500 having the specific frequency required to produce that beat frequency.
In another example, the controller 300 may apply a Fourier transform (e.g. an FFT) to identify the frequency components of the response signal 501. The controller 300 can then assign a single control zone for all the induction coils 200 which were provided with those frequencies, as a single cooking vessel 200 must be occupying all those induction coils 200.
It will be understood that the processor or processing system or circuitry referred to herein may in practice be provided by a single chip or integrated circuit or plural chips or integrated circuits, optionally provided as a chipset, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field-programmable gate array (FPGA), digital signal processor (DSP), graphics processing units (GPUs), etc. The chip or chips may comprise circuitry (as well as possibly firmware) for embodying at least one or more of a data processor or processors, a digital signal processor or processors, baseband circuitry and radio frequency circuitry, which are configurable so as to operate in accordance with the exemplary embodiments. In this regard, the exemplary embodiments may be implemented at least in part by computer software stored in (non-transitory) memory and executable by the processor, or by hardware, or by a combination of tangibly stored software and hardware (and tangibly stored firmware).
Although at least some aspects of the embodiments described herein with reference to the drawings comprise computer processes performed in processing systems or processors, the invention also extends to computer programs, particularly computer programs on or in a carrier, adapted for putting the invention into practice. The program may be in the form of non-transitory source code, object code, a code intermediate source and object code such as in partially compiled form, or in any other non-transitory form suitable for use in the implementation of processes according to the invention. The carrier may be any entity or device capable of carrying the program. For example, the carrier may comprise a storage medium, such as a solid-state drive (SSD) or other semiconductor-based RAM; a ROM, for example a CD ROM or a semiconductor ROM; a magnetic recording medium, for example a floppy disk or hard disk; optical memory devices in general; etc.
The examples described herein are to be understood as illustrative examples of embodiments of the invention. Further embodiments and examples are envisaged. Any feature described in relation to any one example or embodiment may be used alone or in combination with other features. In addition, any feature described in relation to any one example or embodiment may also be used in combination with one or more features of any other of the examples or embodiments, or any combination of any other of the examples or embodiments. Furthermore, equivalents and modifications not described herein may also be employed within the scope of the invention, which is defined in the claims.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2020/074357 | 9/1/2020 | WO |
