The field of the invention is hydraulic fracturing and more particularly smart object that can be preconfigured to operate a predetermined valve in an array of valves to fracture in any desired order.
Fracturing can be accomplished using a series of valves that each have ball seats. The ball seats get progressively larger going uphole and progressively larger balls are launched or dropped to sequentially open the fracturing valves in a bottom up direction. As one zone is fractured the next ball isolates the already fractured zone and opens the next valve going in an uphole direction. The problem with this system is there is a limit to how many balls of different sizes can be accommodated in a borehole of a given size. Another problem is that the balls have such small size difference to accommodate as many zones as possible that surface personnel can inadvertently grab the wrong ball. Organizers for such ball arrays are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 8,157,090. Despite the use of organizers to keep track the wrong ball can still be inadvertently picked.
One offered solution to the progressively larger ball seats in a bottom up fracturing operation has been offered in U.S. Pat. No. 7,322,417. Here the same ball is used and all but the initial ball seat are retracted. Once the first ball lands and opens a fracturing valve, it also extends the next ball seat up to accept the same size ball. Here the offered advantage is that all the balls are the same size. The limitations are that the actuation order is still fixed from bottom up and the mechanism that connects the shifting of one ball seat to the extension of a ball seat above can be quite complex and expensive to build or operate.
Also relevant are U.S. Pat. No. 7,552,779 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,325,617; U.S. Pat. No. 4,823,882; U.S. Pat. No. 7,377,321; U.S. Pat. No. 8,356,670; U.S. Pat. No. 8,701,776; U.S. Pat. No. 9,004,180; U.S. Pat. No. 9,004,179; U.S. Pat. No. 8,616,285; U.S. Pat. No. 8,863,853; U.S. Pat. No. 8,479,823; U.S. Pat. No. 8,668,013; U.S. Pat. No. 8,789,600; U.S. Pat. No. 8,261,761; U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,988; U.S. Pat. No. 8,397,823; U.S. Pat. No. 8,646,531 and U.S. Pat. No. 8,770,299).
The present invention seeks to optimize a fracturing operation by using intelligent objects such as balls or darts that keep track of how many valve assemblies have been passed by the object so that the mechanism of the object can be reconfigured at the desired valve for latching and ultimately shifting the valve with applied pressure in the borehole. These and other aspects of the present invention will be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the detailed description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while recognizing that the full scope of the invention can be determined from the appended claims.
An intelligent dart or ball or other shape is dropped or pumped into a borehole that has multiple valves for access to the formation through which fractures are initiated. The intelligent object engages with the valves as it passes with retractable engagement dogs that are outwardly biased but not to the degree needed to find support unless the valve in question is the one that needs to be operated. In that event the dogs become supported and pressure is applied to the object to shift the valve to the open position. The object can be released at a later time remotely or can be collected or “fished” or can be milled out. Subsequent objects can be landed in the same sleeve after the initial object is released to close it or to close the open port by moving a second sleeve against a first sleeve. Fracturing in any order is envisioned.
The preferred order of operation of sleeves 36 is bottom up so that each landed object that shifts a given sleeve can isolate zones below that have already been fractured. However other orders of sleeve operation are possible. For example, if the sleeves 36 had two landing locations that straddled the ports 12 than the initial object could shift sleeve 36 a first time and another object 32 can land on another seat that would be above the now open ports 12 so that pressure could again be built up to move the same sleeve a second time and blank off ports 12. In this case the sleeve 36 would be configured with wall ports that align with ports 12 in the open position and a blank section that comes into alignment with the ports 12 for the closed position. Another way to be able to open the ports 12 and then close them would be to use two adjacent sleeves 36 and 15. The first sleeve 36 can be as shown in
Another feature can be a remote release for the object 32 using the processor 28 or 40 so that after shifting a sleeve such as 36 the object 32 is released to go the hole bottom or a catcher that is not shown. Alternatively the various landed objects 32 on the various sleeves 36 can be simply milled out or flowed out of the well when production starts after a bottom up sequence for fracturing.
The objects 32 can all be identical and just be programmed to engage specific seats in specific sleeves in a predetermined order. They can have external indication of how many cycles they will undertake before locking the dogs so that the next sleeve is landed on. The ratchet mechanism can be linear or circular. Any locking feature that can be actuated after a predetermined moving of the dogs in and out can be employed. In this manner the landing location for each object is predetermined. The exterior shape of the object can vary from spherical to an elongated shape. The internal components such as the processor 28 can be cushioned with springs such as 60 or 62. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention involves programmable objects to land on predetermined sleeves to facilitate bottom up fracturing. With some modification to the sleeve design or by using sleeve pairs the ports to the formation that are opened can also thereafter be closed. This feature can allow re-fracturing only specific zones by closing the remaining sleeves. The objects can be remotely triggered to release from a shifted sleeve. Optionally the sleeves can communicate data on their movement or lack thereof in real time to a surface location using a variety of signaling techniques to the surface such as acoustic, mud pulses, RFID or other types of known telemetry techniques. Of course a pressure buildup at the surface is another signal that an object has landed on a sleeve.
Another alternative can be electronic, or proximity or over the air or fluid signaling from each sleeve as the object goes by it. After the predetermined number of signals are detected then the dogs can be extended to land on the very next sleeve for operating the sleeve with applied pressure. In that manner the dogs do not need to physically engage a profile on each sleeve as that sleeve is passed. Release of the objects after landing can be accomplished with pressure application and removal cycles that eventually allow the support for the dogs to be undermined so that pressure in the borehole can displace the object from the supported location.
The teachings of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of well operations. These operations may involve using one or more treatment agents to treat a formation, the fluids resident in a formation, a wellbore, and/or equipment in the wellbore, such as production tubing. The treatment agents may be in the form of liquids, gases, solids, semi-solids, and mixtures thereof. Illustrative treatment agents include, but are not limited to, fracturing fluids, acids, steam, water, brine, anti-corrosion agents, cement, permeability modifiers, drilling muds, emulsifiers, demulsifiers, tracers, flow improvers etc. Illustrative well operations include, but are not limited to, hydraulic fracturing, stimulation, tracer injection, cleaning, acidizing, steam injection, water flooding, cementing, etc. Another operation can be production from said zone or injection into said zone.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3263752 | Conrad | Aug 1966 | A |
4823882 | Stokley et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
7322417 | Rytlewski | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325617 | Murray | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7377321 | Rytlewski | May 2008 | B2 |
7552779 | Murray | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8157090 | Ingvardsen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8261761 | Gerrard et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8291988 | King | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8356670 | Telfer | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8397823 | Xu | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8479823 | Mireles | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8505632 | Guerrero | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8505639 | Robison | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8616285 | Tinker et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8646531 | King et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8668013 | O'Connell et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8701776 | Smith et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8770299 | King | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8789600 | O'Connell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8863853 | Harris et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
9004179 | Chauffe | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9004180 | Jackson | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9238953 | Fleming | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9394752 | Fleming | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9523241 | Mageren | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20110056692 | Lopez de Cardenas | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110284240 | Chen | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120085548 | Fleckenstein et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130081827 | Etzel | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130118732 | Chauffe et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130206402 | Coon | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140076542 | Whitsitt | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150075639 | Xu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160258259 | Walton | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012045165 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170096876 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |