Latin name of the genus and species of the plant claimed: Zoysia japonica Steud.
Variety denomination: ‘FAES1319’.
The present invention relates to a new and distinct asexually reproduced variety of zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.) designated ‘FAES1319’. The parents of the zoysiagrass ‘FAES1319’ are unknown. ‘FAES1319’ was selected as an individual plant in 2008 from a cultivated area located in Parkland, FL. This cultivated area was planted with various zoysiagrasses, mostly Zoysia matrella plants interspersed with Zoysia japonica plants. ‘FAES1319’ was first asexually propagated in Citra, FL in 2008 through vegetative cuttings of stolons that were planted and rooted in potting media. Asexually reproduced plants of ‘FAES1319’ have remained stable and true to type through at least six successive cycles of this vegetative propagation. ‘FAES1319’ has been determined to be tetraploid (2n=4x=40).
‘FAES1319’ is a perennial zoysiagrass that spreads by stolons and rhizomes, and was identified based on its superior attributes from a collection of zoysiagrass plants that were evaluated for turfgrass quality traits in Citra, FL under cultivated conditions. ‘FAES1319’ can be unambiguously distinguished by its medium leaf texture, high turfgrass quality, good shade tolerance, good winter color retention, good spring green up, and low incidence of large patch disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2-2 LP. ‘FAES1319’ may also be distinguished by the broad growing range in which it exhibits high to good turfgrass quality. ‘FAES1319’ may be used as a turfgrass that is suitable for home lawns and commercial turf applications. The observed cool season turfgrass quality, color retention, and shade tolerance of ‘FAES1319’ indicates that it is well-suited to the southern and central areas of the U.S. zoysiagrass adaptation zone, and it should be equally well-suited to other subtropical and tropical areas worldwide where zoysiagrass is cultivated.
This new zoysiagrass plant is illustrated by the accompanying photographs of plants grown in a Gainesville, FL greenhouse, as provided in
The following detailed description sets forth distinctive characteristics of ‘FAES1319’, as characterized in greenhouse and field conditions. The data that define these characteristics were collected from clonally propagated plants. ‘FAES1319’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions, and the measurements given may vary when grown in different environments. Certain characteristics may also vary with plant age. The color descriptions provided herein are based on The Royal Horticultural Society (R.H.S.) Colour Chart by The Royal Horticultural Society, London, Sixth Revised Edition. If any R.H.S. color designations below differ from the accompanying photographs, the R.H.S. color designations are accurate.
The morphological characteristics of ‘FAES1319’ and commercial zoysiagrass varieties ‘SS-500’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,466) and ‘BK-9’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 27,051), and experimental varieties ‘FAES1312’ (Zoysia japonica (L) Merr.) and ‘FAES1313’ (Zoysia japonica Steud.) were evaluated in 2015 and 2016 from greenhouse potted plants that were approximately 6 months in age; arrangement was a randomized complete block design with three replications. Three samples were measured for each trait from each pot and averaged to represent the replication. Leaf length (cm) and width (mm) were measured on the second fully expanded leaf below the growing meristem of a stolon. Average internode length and stolon diameter were determined through measuring the third internode back from the growing point of three different stolons growing over the edge of the pots. The greenhouse was located near Gainesville, FL., with a daily temperature range of 15° C., and daytime high of 33° C. The plants were grown under natural day length without supplemental lighting. The plants were fertilized with the equivalent of 0.45 kg N per month, using a soluble fertilizer of 20-20-20 (N—P2O5—K2O) in four equal soluble applications per month. Data were averaged across dates and provided in Table 1.
‘FAES1319’ exhibited a leaf width that was significantly less than that of ‘SS-500’ but significantly greater than that of ‘BK-9’. ‘FAES1319’ also exhibited a leaf blade length that was longer than that of ‘BK-9’ but similar to that of ‘SS-500’. The average observed internode length and stolon diameter of ‘FAES1319’ were both similar to those of both ‘BK-9’ and ‘SS-500’.
The following are additional unique and distinguishing characteristics exhibited by ‘FAES1319’ when grown under the above greenhouse conditions:
‘FAES1319’ was entered into the 2013 National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) trials to evaluate its long-term performance under multiple environments. Persistence through time is weighted heavily when considering the merit of a turfgrass. These trials were conducted over 17 locations throughout the U.S. and utilized ‘SS-500’, ‘Meyer’ (unpatented), and ‘Zeon’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,166) as the check varieties. Additionally, data can be selected for specific assessment of a genotype's performance in a location, region, or season to identify areas of adaptation. All trials were arranged as randomize complete block designs with three replications and planted with 24 5.0×5.0 cm plugs in 2013. Turfgrass quality was rated on a “1” to “9” scale in which “9” indicates “best,” “6” indicates “minimally accepted,” and “1” indicates “poorest”; turfgrass color was rated on a “1” to “9” scale in which “9” indicates the darkest green, “1” is brown; and turfgrass density was rated on a “1” to “9” scale in which “9” indicates “best,” “6” indicates “minimally accepted,” and “1” indicates “poorest.” Plots were rated following establishment from 2014-2017.
Trial means from 2014-2017 trials are presented in Table 2 and Table 3. Fall color from November in Dallas, TX and Citra, FL, density in Citra FL, and turfgrass quality from Citra, FL and Jay, FL are found in Table 2. Table 3 contains the average turfgrass quality from 14 locations (Locations averaged were Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Jay, FL, Citra, FL, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee, Dallas, TX, and College Station, TX) and Manhattan, KS to illustrate the broad adaptation of ‘FAES1319’ and its cold tolerance, and shade tolerance in Riverside, CA.
The fall color retention of ‘FAES1319’ was better than that of ‘Meyer’ in both Dallas, TX and Citra, FL (Table 2). ‘FAES1319’ also had better fall color than ‘SS-500’ in Citra, FL. The fall color of ‘Zeon’ was similar to ‘FAES1319’ at both locations. The average density of ‘FAES1319’ was higher than the average density ratings of ‘Meyer’, ‘SS-500’, and ‘Zeon’ in Citra, FL. The average turfgrass quality of ‘FAES1319’ was higher than the quality of ‘Meyer’ and ‘SS-500’ at Citra, FL and Jay, FL. Additionally, in Citra, FL the quality of ‘FAES1319’ was better than the quality observed for ‘SS-500’ and ‘Zeon’.
Averaging across the 14 locations from 2014-2017 resulted in ‘FAES1319’ having higher turfgrass quality than ‘Meyer’, ‘SS-500’, and ‘Zeon’ (Table 3). In Manhattan, KS, the turfgrass quality of ‘FAES1319’ was not different from any check cultivar. ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass is considered the industry standard for cold tolerance. Considering the average performance across locations and its performance in Manhattan, KS, ‘FAES1319’ is broadly adapted and has good cold tolerance. ‘FAES1319’ is also adapted to shade. ‘Zeon’ exhibits excellent shade tolerance. The quality of ‘FAES1319’ under shade in Riverside, CA was equivalent to ‘Zeon’ and better than the quality of ‘Meyer’ and ‘SS-500’.
Large patch, caused by Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2-2 LP is the most important disease of zoysiagrass. Large patch response data was collected in 2017 as part of the 2013 Zoysiagrass NTEP trial (described above) from Arkansas and Florida. The observed percent incidence of disease of large patch at the Florida location was less severe for ‘FAES1319’ than for the ‘Meyer’ and ‘SS-500’; whereas, in Arkansas, disease was less for ‘FAES1319’ on May 1, 2017 compared to ‘Meyer’ (
‡Locations averaged were Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Jay, FL, Citra, FL, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee, Dallas, TX, and College Station, TX.
This invention was made with government support under 2015-51181-24291 awarded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.). The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PP11466 | Ito et al. | Aug 2000 | P |
| PP13166 | Doguet | Nov 2002 | P2 |
| PP27051 | Chapman | Aug 2016 | P3 |
| Entry |
|---|
| www.https://ntep.org “National Turfgrass Evaluation Program” (Retrieved from the Internet on May 19, 2024)(5 pages only). |