Zoysiagrass plant named ‘XZ 14069’

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • PP36252
  • Patent Number
    PP36,252
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 13, 2023
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 12, 2024
    2 months ago
  • CPC
    • A01H6/469
  • US Classifications
    Field of Search
    • US
    • PLT 390000
    • CPC
    • A01H5/12
  • International Classifications
    • A01H5/12
    • A01H6/46
    • Term Extension
      0
Abstract
‘XZ 14069’ is a medium to dark green perennial zoysiagrass cultivar with medium-fine texture low incidence of large patch disease and aggressive stoloniferous growth producing high density turf performance ideal for low-management landscaping. It is distinguishable from other cultivars by medium-fine texture, plant architecture and characteristics such as high drought tolerance, turf quality, disease resistance and aggressive establishment from minimal input. ‘XZ 14069’ shows persistence under an array of climates including warm-temperate, warm-humid and hot-arid. ‘XZ 14069’ is also genetically distinct from other zoysiagrass cultivars currently in the marketplace known to the Inventor. ‘XZ 14069’ exhibits very low fertility and no inflorescences have been observed.
Description

Latin name of the genus and species: The Latin name of the novel grass cultivar disclosed herein is Zoysia japonica x Zoysia matrella.


Variety denomination: The inventive cultivar of Zoysia japonica x Zoysia matrella disclosed herein has been given the varietal denomination ‘XZ 14069’.


STATEMENT REGARDING ELECTRONIC FILING OF A SEQUENCE LISTING

A Sequence Listing in XML format, entitled 5051-1010_ST26.xml, 34,449 bytes in size, generated on Oct. 5, 2023, and filed herewith, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for its disclosures.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Zoysiagrasses are warm-season, perennial turfgrass species well-adapted for home lawns, commercial landscapes, and golf courses across the southern US and upwards into the transition zone. Given that zoysiagrasses have lower maintenance requirements than other warm-season grasses, expanded use of this grass could have significant reductions in negative environmental impacts. However, current breeding efforts in the US are focused on fairway and putting green zoysiagrasses. Little effort has been put towards the development of aggressive, vegetatively established zoysiagrass cultivars well-adapted for golf course roughs, lawns, roadsides, airports, and other infrequently mown areas where crop function and stress tolerance are of equal importance to aesthetics. Aggressive zoysiagrass germplasm that has excellent stress tolerance and fast establishment when managed with low to no inputs would increase the prevalence of zoysiagrass use in new markets.


‘XZ 14069’ is a new zoysiagrass cultivar that is fast to establish, drought tolerant, and able to retain acceptable color and turf quality under very low inputs. Furthermore, this cultivar is not to be limited to low-management situations such as golf course roughs or roadsides, as its above average turf quality makes it suitable to higher end uses like lawns and golf course fairways.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

‘XZ 14069’ is a perennial zoysiagrass that is spread by stolons and rhizomes and was identified in 2016 because of its turf quality and aggressive growth from a collection of zoysiagrass plants that were evaluated under cultivated conditions in Raleigh, Jacksonville, and Laurel Springs in North Carolina. ‘XZ 14069’ can be distinguishable from other cultivars by its medium-fine texture, turf quality under low inputs, high density that outcompetes weeds, low seedhead production, aggressive stoloniferous growth during establishment, and low incidence of large patch disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 202 LP. Additionally, Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) data shows ‘XZ 14069’ is genetically distinct from all major zoysiagrass cultivars currently on the market known to the Inventor. ‘XZ 14069’ persists well under an array of climates including warm-temperate, warm-humid and hot-arid, as well as under a range of uses, from low-management situations such as golf course roughs or roadsides to higher-end uses like lawns and golf course fairways.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The photographs in the drawings were made using conventional techniques and show the colors as true as reasonably possible by conventional photography. Photographs were taken of plant materials grown in greenhouses for eight months. During this period, plants were under daily watering, monthly fertilization, and no mowing. Colors in the photographs may differ slightly from the color values cited in the detailed botanical description, which accurately describe the colors of the new Zoysia japonica x Zoysia matrella grass ‘XZ 14069’.



FIG. 1 is a color photograph of stolons of a typical specimen of the claimed plant.



FIG. 2 is a color photograph of a stolon of a typical specimen of the claimed plant.



FIG. 3 is a color photograph of leaf blades of a typical specimen of the claimed plant.



FIG. 4 is a color photograph of leaf hairs of a typical specimen of the claimed plant.



FIGS. 5A-5B are two color photographs of a typical plot of the claimed plant. FIG. 5A is a far view: FIG. 5B is a close view.



FIG. 6 is a data graphic tabulating cumulative turf performance index (TPI) values. The TPI value refers to the number of times a treatment occurred in the top statistical group across all parameters, for all five locations. The maximum possible turf performance index number for each location is as follows: Indiana (13), North Carolina (12), Georgia (7), Arizona (5), and California (4). Treatments with an X indicate the entry or check was not planted at that location.



FIG. 7 shows an image of a UPGMA dendrogram of 34 Zoysiagrass commercial cultivars and ‘XZ 14069’ generated using 171 simple sequence repeat alleles.



FIGS. 8A-8B show images of Principal Coordinate (PCO) analysis 2D (FIG. 8A) and 3D (FIG. 8B) plots of 32 Zoysiagrass commercial cultivars and ‘XZ 14069’ generated using 171 simple sequence repeat alleles. ‘XZ 14069’ and its two parents are circled. ‘XZ 14070’ is a sister line of ‘XZ 14069’.



FIG. 9 shows images of PCR amplification of 32 zoysiagrass commercial cultivars and ‘XZ 14069’ with simple sequence repeat primer pairs za03k 15 and GB-X JM-025 showing unique SSR profiles for ‘XZ 14069’.





DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW VARIETY

The following is a detailed description of the botanical characteristics of a new and distinct cultivar of Zoysia plant known by the cultivar name ‘XZ 14069’. All colors cited herein refer to The Royal Horticulture Society (RHS) Colour Chart designations (The Royal Horticultural Society, London, Flower Council of Holland 1986 edition) except where general terms of ordinary dictionary significance are used. Where dimensions, sizes, colors, and other characteristics are given, it is to be understood that such characteristics are approximations or averages set forth as accurately as practicable.


This invention relates to a new and unique cultivar of perennial zoysiagrass plant (Zoysia japonica x Zoysia matrella) designated as ‘XZ 14069’. ‘XZ 14069’ is an F1 hybrid that was produced in Raleigh, NC in fall 2014 by crossing cultivar ‘Meyer’ [unpatented Zoysia japonica Steud. ] as the female parent with pollen of cultivar ‘Victoria’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P described therein as Zoysia matrella (L.) Merr.; noted as a hybrid Zoysia japonica x Zoysia matrella per DNA marker analysis as described in Kimball et al. 2013 Crop Science 53(1):285-295]. Crosses of ‘Meyer’ by ‘Victoria’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P] were manually made in 2014 under greenhouses conditions. When ‘Meyer’ inflorescences were ready for pollination, pollen from ‘Victoria’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P] was collected in petri dishes and pollen grains were spread on the stigmas using a brush. To avoid pollen contamination, stigmas were covered with a glycine shoot bag after pollination (five days). Pollinated flowers reach maturity after four weeks. Harvested seeds were germinated in petri dishes for six weeks. Seedlings were transferred to soil and later to greenhouses where they reached maturity in azalea pots (6 in. diameter×4¼ in. tall). ‘XZ 14069’ was first vegetatively propagated in Raleigh, NC in 2015 by tillers, rhizomes and stolons, and rooting them in potting soil. Asexually reproduced plants of ‘XZ 14069’ have remained stable and true to type through at least 7 successive cycles of vegetative propagation. ‘XZ 14069’ has been determined to be tetraploid (2n=4x=40).


‘XZ 14069’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions: therefore, the phenotype may vary under different environmental conditions such as season, temperature, light intensity, day length, cultural conditions, and the like, without however, any variance in the genotype. The following morphological measurements were collected on ‘XZ 14069’ plants grown in greenhouse conditions for eight months.

  • Leaf blades:
      • Length.—21.87 mm.
      • Width.—1.54 mm.
      • Shape.—Keeled.
      • Apex.—Pointed.
      • Aspect.—Concave.
      • Margin.—Smooth.
      • Auricle.—Absent.
      • Collar.—Broad continues with hairy edges.
      • Sheath.—Overlapping.
      • Leaf bud.—Rolled.
      • Ligule type.—Short fringe of hairs.
      • Adaxial surface.—Texture: moderate trichomes. Color: RHS 137A: Green-Group.
      • Abaxial surface.—Texture: smooth. Color: RHS 137B: Green-Group.
      • Venation.—Parallel.
  • Inflorescence: No inflorescences have been observed under greenhouse conditions since its original development. Under field conditions, data for North Carolina reported 0% seedhead density for both 2020 and 2021 (as tabulated in Tables 1-7 below).
  • Stolons:
      • Internode length.—11.99 mm.
      • Internode color.—RHS 146C: Yellow-Green-Group.
      • Internode diameter.—1.46 mm Apical meristem.
      • Color.—RHS 146B: Yellow-Green-Group.
      • Node diameter.—2.07 mm.
      • Node color.—RHS 146C: Yellow-Green-Group.
  • Rhizomes:
      • First internode.—length 7.66mm, width 1.3 mm.
      • Second internode.—length 9.15 mm, width 1.2 mm.
      • Third internode.—length 11.62 mm, width 1.0 mm.
      • Node width.—1.95 mm.
      • Internode color.—RHS 161B: grayed-yellow group.
      • Node color.—RHS 161A: grayed-yellow group.


Plant height average of ‘XZ 14069’ is 110 mm in pots grown under greenhouse conditions. Plant height under field conditions depends on the standard protocols for mowing set by each sod farm. Data has not been collected.



FIGS. 1-5 provide photographic images of the claimed plant. In particular, FIG. 1 shows an example of stolon of a typical specimen of ‘XZ 14069’; FIG. 2 shows an example of stolon thickness of a typical specimen of ‘XZ 14069’; FIG. 3 shows an example of leaf blades of a typical specimen of ‘XZ 14069’; FIG. 4 shows an example of leaf hairs of a typical specimen of ‘XZ 14069’; and FIGS. 5A-5B show examples of a plot (FIG. 5A, far view; FIG. 5B, close view) of a typical specimen of ‘ZX-14069’.


Morphological analysis of ‘XZ 14069’ and comparison with other Zoysia cultivars. ‘XZ 14069’ was morphologically compared to commercial cultivars ‘Meyer’ (female parent; unpatented), ‘Victoria’ (male parent: [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]), ‘El Toro’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P],


‘Compadre’ [unpatented], ‘Palisades’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P], ‘Diamond’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P] and ‘JaMur’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]. Analyses were performed in Raleigh, NC, using 8 month old plants. SUNGRO® HOTICULTURE MM830-F3B 2.8 Cu ft soil enriched with 50-60% sphagnum peat moss, softwood bark, perlite and dolomite limestone was used for propagation. Plant material was propagated into 12.5 cm-diameter by 8.9 cm-deep pots for a total of three pots per entry. Plant materials were established in June 2022 and grown through January 2023 inside a greenhouse. Daily temperatures ranged from 20 to 30° C. Pots were fertilized every 45 days using Turf Builder Southern Lawn Food (32-0-10) from Scotts®. Watering was performed as needed, four to five times per week. Light requirements included natural sunlight only. Pots were left without mowing to trigger stolon development around the pots. In February of 2023, a digital caliper (6 inches precision measuring tool) was used to collect data from morphological traits. Morphological measurements were taken on internode length, internode diameter and node diameter. From each of the three pots per cultivar, nine measurements were collected per trait. Internode diameter and length were measured using the space between the fourth and fifth nodes, while the stolon node diameter was measured at the fourth node. Leaf length and width were collected from the third youngest leaf. In addition, length of the first leaf at the apical meristem was measured separately. ‘XZ 14069’ did not produce inflorescences. Collected data were analyzed using LSD (P≤0.05) in R.


Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P=0.05.









TABLE 1







Internode length of zoysiagrass commercial cultivars,


measured under greenhouses conditions.














Internode




N
Entry
Length (mm)
Group







1
‘Compadre’
30.93
a




[unpatented]





2
‘Diamond’
 8.56
d




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]





3
‘El Toro’
19.88
bc




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]





4
‘JaMur’
23.78
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]





5
‘XZ 14069'
11.99
d



6
‘Meyer’
16.90
c




[unpatented]





7
‘Palisades’
16.64
c




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]





8
‘Victoria’
11.50
d




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]

















TABLE 2







Internode diameter of zoysiagrass commercial


cultivars, measured under greenhouses conditions.














Internode




N
Entry
Diameter (mm)
Group







1
‘Compadre’
1.45
b




[unpatented]





2
‘Diamond’
0.67
d




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]





3
‘El Toro’
1.77
a




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]





4
‘JaMur’
1.54
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]





5
‘XZ 14069’
1.46
b



6
‘Meyer’
1.39
b




[unpatented]





7
‘Palisades’
1.49
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]





8
‘Victoria’
1.20
c




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]

















TABLE 3







Node diameter of zoysiagrass commercial


cultivars, measured under greenhouses conditions.














Node Diameter




N
Entry
(mm)
Group







1
‘Compadre’
2.47
ab




[unpatented]





2
‘Diamond’
1.08
d




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]





3
‘El Toro’
2.83
a




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]





4
‘JaMur’
2.35
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]





5
‘XZ 14069’
2.07
bc



6
‘Meyer’
2.15
b




[unpatented]





7
‘Palisades’
2.48
ab




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]





8
‘Victoria’
1.69
c




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]

















TABLE 4







Leaf blade length of zoysiagrass commercial


cultivars, measured under greenhouses conditions.














Leaf Blade




N
Entry
Length (mm)
Group







1
‘Compadre’
23.98
b




[unpatented]





2
‘Diamond’
11.96
c




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]





3
‘El Toro’
22.99
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]





4
‘JaMur’
32.46
a




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]





5
‘XZ 14069’
21.87
b



6
‘Meyer’
22.85
b




[unpatented]





7
‘Palisades’
18.92
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]





8
‘Victoria’
21.54
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]

















TABLE 5







Leaf blade width of zoysiagrass commercial


cultivars, measured under greenhouses conditions.














Leaf Blade




N
Entry
Width (mm)
Group







1
‘Compadre’
4.08
a




[unpatented]





2
‘Diamond’
1.58
de




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]





3
‘El Toro’
3.79
ab




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]





4
‘JaMur’
3.72
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]





5
‘XZ 14069’
1.54
e



6
‘Meyer’
2.46
c




[unpatented]





7
‘Palisades’
3.50
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]





8
‘Victoria’
1.86
d




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]

















TABLE 6







Leaf sheath length of zoysiagrass commercial


cultivars, measured under greenhouses conditions.














Leaf Sheath




N
Entry
Length (mm)
Group







1
‘Compadre’
9.97
a




[unpatented]





2
‘Diamond’
4.27
f




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]





3
‘El Toro’
7.48
d




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]





4
‘JaMur’
9.16
ab




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]





5
‘XZ 14069’
6.18
e



6
‘Meyer’
8.24
bcd




[unpatented]





7
‘Palisades’
7.69
cd




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]





8
‘Victoria’
8.90
abc




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]

















TABLE 7







First apical leaf length of zoysiagrass commercial


cultivars, measured under greenhouses conditions.














First Apical Leaf




N
Entry
Length (mm)
Group







1
‘Compadre’
27.80
a




[unpatented]





2
‘Diamond’
 8.07
d




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]





3
‘El Toro’
12.73
cd




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]





4
‘JaMur’
12.79
cd




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]





5
‘XZ 14069’
18.20
b



6
‘Meyer’
16.30
bc




[unpatented]





7
‘Palisades’
11.42
cd




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]





8
‘Victoria’
10.13
d




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]










Low-input Trials in Multiple Climates: 24 zoysiagrass lines and commercial cultivars ‘Chisholm’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 30,653P3], ‘Meyer’ [unpatented], ‘Empire’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,466P], ‘JaMur’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2], and ‘Zenith’ [unpatented] were evaluated for performance under low-maintenance regimes across different climates (Table 8).









TABLE 8







Site information for low-input zoysiagrass trials.














North






Indiana
Carolina
Georgia
Arizona
California





Location,
West
Raleigh
Tifton
Stanfield
Escondido


City
Lafayette






Latitude
40°26'
35°44'
31º28'
32°55'
33º5'


and
31″N;
18″N;
30″N;
23″N;
26″N;


longitude
86º55'
78º40'
83º31'
111º56'
117°0'



47″W
39″W
34″W
17″W
24″W


Soil type
Silt loam
Sandy
Loamy
Sandy
Sandy




loam
sand
loam
loam


Climate
Warm
Warm
Warm
Hot arid,
Arid,


classi-
temperate,
temperate,
temperate,
desert, hot
steppe,


ficationa
no dry
no dry
no dry
summer
hot dry



season,
season,
season,
(BWh)
summer,



hot
hot
hot

cool



summer
summer
summer

wet



(Cfa)
(Cfa)
(Cfa)

winter,







(BSk)


USDA
5b
7b
8b
9b
10a


plant
(−26.1 to
(−15 to
(−12.2 to
(−3.9 to
(−1.1 to


hardiness
−23.3° C.)
−12.2° C.)
−9.4° C.)
−1.1° C.)
1.7° C.)


zoneb






aFrom Köppen-Geiger climate map, retrieved from koeppen-geiger.vuwien.ac.at/present.htm.




bAverage annual extreme minimum temperature in parentheses and USDA plant hardiness zones as defined by USDA.







The colder continental climate for the Indiana site led to greater winterkill during the 2018-2019 winter season. ‘XZ 14069’ was not bred for cold tolerance and suffered heavy winterkill damage in year one. However, it was able to recover in year two and ranked in the top group of significance for six out of the 13 traits evaluated. In North Carolina, winter injury was generally not as severe as Indiana. ‘XZ 14069’ was the top ranked line, having a turf performance index (TPI) of 10 out of 12. In Georgia, which represented a warm-humid climate, ‘XZ 14069’ obtained a TPI of 4 out of 7. In California and Arizona, which represented warm-dry climates, ‘XZ 14069’ was again one of the top performing lines. Turf performance values for ‘XZ 14069’ were 5 (out of 5) and 4 (out of 4) for Arizona and California, respectively. When taking into consideration all sites combined, ‘XZ 14069’ emerges as the line with a highest combined TPI across locations of 29 as compared to 24 for the second highest line (FIG. 6). Furthermore, it was one of only two lines that exhibited stable performance across climates.


‘XZ 14069’ was submitted to a low-input warm-season species trial which aims at testing performance of entries under reduced fertilization and very limited irrigation. The trial is being evaluated at Jay, FL (FL3); Citra, FL (FL4); Starkville, MS (MS1); Raleigh, NC (NC1): Las Cruces, NM (NM1); Stillwater, OK (OK1); College Station, TX (TX2); and Logan, UT (UT1).


While Zoysia species have been found to have fewer major diseases than other turfgrasses, they are very susceptible to large patch, caused by the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Among warm-season turfgrasses, zoysiagrass is one of the most susceptible to the disease. The species often sustain serious damage and recovery can take several weeks or months. Development of cultivars with genetic resistance to the fungus is the most effective means for management of large patch. ‘XZ 14069’ was evaluated for large patch resistance under controlled environmental conditions at a phytotron in Raleigh, NC. Resistant cultivar ‘Diamond’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P] was used as a reference as well as cultivars ‘Meyer’ [unpatented] and ‘Zeon’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,166P2]. Plugs of all individuals were grown in Styrofoam cups filled with calcined clay for 2-3 months until fully established. At the time, cups were arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design with two replications in a walk-in growth chamber at the phytotron. Large patch inoculations were performed by placing 8-R. solani infected rye grain in the crown region of each plant. Plants were kept at 20/18° C. with >75% relative humidity to promote infection. Disease severity was evaluated every three days for 21 days using the Horsfall-Barratt scale (Horsfall and Barratt 1945 Phytopathology 35:655; Bock et al. 2010 Crit Rev in Plant Sciences 29(2):59-107)). Two runs of inoculations with two reps each were conducted.









TABLE 9







Large patch disease incidence caused by



Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 202 LP.















Turf Quality




N
Entry
(TQ)
groups
















1
‘Meyer’
6.5
a




[unpatented]





2
‘Zeon’
6.3
a




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,166P2]





3
‘Diamond’
5
b




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]





4
‘XZ 14069’
5
b










DNA Fingerprinting. In order to demonstrate that ‘XZ 14069’ is a unique genotype and genetically different from all major zoysiagrass cultivars currently on the market known to the Inventor, simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used to generate DNA fingerprints of these materials. Thirty-four cultivars (Table 10) and ‘XZ 14069’ were genotyped with 19 SSR primer pairs (Table 11). A total of 19 loci were amplified (one locus per primer pair). The number of alleles per locus ranged between 3 and 16 for a total of 171 alleles analyzed (Table 11). Levels of polymorphism among the materials analyzed were comparable to those found in previous studies (Kimball et al. 2013 Crop Science 53(1): 285-295: Moore et al. 2017 Crop Science 57:S-1-S-12). Genetic similarity values were calculated for all pairwise genotype combinations according to Dice (Dice, L. R. 1945 Ecology 26: 297-302). Dice similarities were then used to construct a dendrogram using the UPGMA (Sokal and Michener 1958 A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 28: 1409-1438) clustering procedure in order to assess genetic relationships among genotypes. Additionally, a principal coordinate analysis (PCO) was performed for the same purpose.


Genetic similarity values (Sij) for ‘XZ 14069’ and each of the cultivars tested ranged from 0.13 to 0.60. The average genetic similarity between ‘XZ 14069’ and each of the other cultivars (Sij= 0.32) is the same as the overall average among all other cultivars (Table 12). ‘XZ 14069’ is closest to cultivar ‘Meyer’ (Sij=0.60), one of its parents. However, this distance is sufficiently low to obtain adequate separation among these cultivars as seen in the dendrogram (FIG. 7) and the PCO plots (FIGS. 8A-8B). Only two SSR primers, za03k15 and GB-X JM-025, were sufficient to separate ‘XZ 14069’ from all other cultivars tested (FIG. 9). The SSR data presented here provides further evidence that ‘XZ 14069’ is a unique genotype.









TABLE 10







List of genotypes used for comparison of genetic similarity


between ‘XZ 14069’ and major commercial cultivars


of zoysiagrass.













Confirmed


Num-

Species
Species


ber
Genotype
Designation
Designation*





 1
‘XZ 14069’

Z. japonica x









Z. matrella




 2
‘Belair’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica




[unpatented]




 3
‘Carrizo’

Zoysia japonica







[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 17,808]




 4
‘Cashmere’

Zoysia matrella


Z. matrella




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 6,529]




 5
‘Cavalier’

Zoysia matrella


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,778P]


Z. matrella



 6
‘Chinese Common’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica




[unpatented]




 7
‘Chisholm’

Zoysia japonica







[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 30,653P3]




 8
‘Compadre’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica




[unpatented]




 9
‘Crowne’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,570]


Z. matrella



10
‘Cutlass’

Zoysia japonica







[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 25,380]




11
‘Diamond’

Zoysia matrella


Z. matrella




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]




12
‘El Toro’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]


Z. matrella



13
‘Emerald’

Z. japonica x


Z. japonica x




[unpatented]

Z. pacifica


Z. matrella



14
‘Empire’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,466]


Z. matrella



15
‘Empress’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,495]


Z. matrella



16
‘Geo’

Z. japonica x







[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 27,051P3]

Z. pacifica




17
‘GNZ’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,074]


Z. matrella



18
‘Himeno’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,267P3]




19
‘Innovation’

Zoysia japonica







[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 31,464P3]




20
‘JaMur’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]


Z. matrella



21
‘Matrella’

Zoysia matrella


Z. japonica x




[unpatented]


Z. matrella



22
‘Meyer’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica




[unpatented]




23
‘Palisades’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]


Z. matrella



24
‘Pristine’

Zoysia matrella


Z. matrella




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 18,415P3]




25
‘Rollmaster’

Zoysia matrella


Z. japonica x




[unpatented]


Z. matrella



26
‘Royal’

Z. japonica x


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,395]

Z. matrella


Z. matrella



27
‘Serene’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,175P2]


Z. matrella



28
‘Southern Gem’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,218P2]


Z. matrella



29
‘Toccoa Green’

Z. japonica x


Z. matrella




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 18,405]

Z. pacifica




30
‘Ultimate Flora’

Zoysia matrella


Z. matrella




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 23,716P3]




31
‘Victoria’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]


Z. matrella



32
‘Y2’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 17,824P2]


Z. matrella



33
‘Zenith’

Zoysia japonica


Z. japonica




[unpatented]




34
‘Zeon’

Zoysia matrella


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,166P2]


Z. matrella



35
‘Zorro’

Zoysia matrella


Z. japonica x




[U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,130]


Z. matrella






*As determined by simple sequence repeat (SSR) analysis in Kimball et al. (2013)













TABLE 11







Summary statistics for simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers used to assess


genetic relatedness among 'XZ 14069' and 34 zoysiagrass commercial cultivars.













Primer


SEQ

SEQ
No. of


Pair
Primer

ID

ID
alleles


No.
Name
Forward
NO:
Reverse
NO:
amplified
















 1
za01p11
CACGACGTTGTAAA
 1
TGCGCTTTCTA
 2
14




ACGACTCCGCTACC

GAGATCTTC






AAGTAATCACT









 2
za03k14
CACGACGTTGTAAA
 3
TGATTGAACA
 4
12




ACGACAGGACCAGT

GAAAATTCAC






GAACATAGTGG

C







 3
a02o06
CACGACGTTGTAAA
 5
GCAATAAACA
 6
5




ACGACGATTGAAGC

ACTCTCTTCCT






TCATGTCTATGTG

C







 4
b02c06
CACGACGTTGTAAA
 7
CCTCGCTATGA
 8
7




ACGACCAGTTGCTG

GTGGTCTAC






CTAAGGATTCT









 5
b02g05
CACGACGTTGTAAA
 9
ACCTGAGGAG
10
13




ACGACGGAGCATAT

GACCAGAG






ATGGATGCATT









 6
b03g12
CACGACGTTGTAAA
11
TTGCTCTCACT
12
16




ACGACGTTCACAGT

CCAAAGGA






TCAAGAAAGCC









 7
b06j18
CAAATGAGCGTCCA
13
GTTGATGCCAC
14
11




TTTC

AGACAAAG







 8
b07i05
CACGACGTTGTAAA
15
GTTGCCTCTTT
16
10




ACGACATGGAATTA

CATACTTGTG






ATCTTCTCCCTG









 9
b01b12
GCTAGTGTTTGTTGA
17
AACTTGAGCGT
18
7




TGACTTG

GCTATGC







10
zb01b13
GCATATCAGTGAAA
19
TTATGCTCGCA
20
6




AGGAGC

CAAGAGTC







11
zb01c23a
CAAGAGGAGTTTGG
21
TCAGTCCCTCA
22
9




GCTC

AGGAAATTA







12
zb01d04
AGTAGTGTTTGGAA
23
ACAGTAGCTTG
24
15




TCTTCCG

TTTCCTCTCTG







13
GB-
AGGTCGGAGATGGA
25
CCCGCCTCATG
26
6



ZJM-025
GAGC

ATAAATG







14
GB-
GCTTGCAGGATAAG
27
CATGCATAAAT
28
6



ZJM-051
GGGA

GTGGGGG







15
GB-
CGTTGATATCGAAC
29
ACCGTCGAGC
30
3



ZJM-136
CGGA

ACTAGCAA







16
a01a07
ATTCCTGATCATCTG
31
AATTACTGCCA
32
9




AGACTTC

TTTCTGGC







17
a03f03
ATCAAGGTAACAAG
33
GAGAAGGACG
34
7




ATCACGA

TAACGTAACAA







18
b01c16
AGGACAAGTGAGGC
35
AAAGGTCAGTC
36
9




AGTAGA

TCCGTCC







19
b08k21
GAGAACGACGTCCT
37
ACTTCGCACAC
38
6




GGAC

AGAGAAGAC




Total





171


Average





9.00


Min





3


Max





16
















TABLE 12







Dice genetic similarities among ‘XZ 14069’ and 34 selected


zoysiagrass commercial cultivars estimated with 19 SSR primer pairs.











‘XZ 14069’







‘Compadre’ [unpatented]
0.39



‘Meyer’ [unpatented]
0.60



‘Zenith’ [unpatented]
0.40



‘Chinese Common’ [unpatented]
0.20



‘Himeno’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,267P3]
0.15



‘Crowne’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,570]
0.26



‘El Toro’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 5,845P]
0.13



‘Empire’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,466P]
0.24



‘JaMur’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,178P2]
0.23



‘Victoria’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,135P]
0.19



‘Empress’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,495]
0.31



‘Palisades’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 11,515P]
0.30



‘Matrella’ [unpatented]
0.32



‘Southern Gem’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 15,218P2]
0.36



‘GNZ’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,074]
0.55



‘Cavalier’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,778P]
0.42



‘Rollmaster’ [unpatented]
0.27



‘Zeon’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 13,166P2]
0.35



‘Zorro’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,130]
0.40



‘Royal’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,395]
0.25



‘Y2’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 17,824P2]
0.25



‘Emerald’ [unpatented]
0.42



‘Ultimate Flora’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 23,716P3]
0.25



‘Pristine’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 18,415P3]
0.36



‘Cashmere’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 6,529]
0.38



‘Diamond’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 10,636P]
0.36



‘Carrizo’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 17,808]
0.33



‘Serene’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 14,175P2]
0.29



‘Geo’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 27,051P3]
0.57



‘Innovation’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 31,464P3]
0.18



‘Cutlass’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 25,380]
0.24



‘Chisholm’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 30,653P3]
0.28



‘Belair’ [unpatented]
0.32



‘Toccoa Green’ [U.S. Plant Pat. No. 18,405]
0.42









Claims
  • 1. A new and distinct cultivar of Zoysia plant named ‘XZ 14069’, substantially as illustrated and described herein.
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under grant numbers 2015-51181-24291 and 2019-51181-30472 awarded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The government has certain rights in the invention.

Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
https://cals.ncsu.edu/crop-and-soil-sciences/news/nc-state-turfgrass-releases-lobo-zoysiagrass/; Nov. 12, 2021; 7 pages.
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.ftga.org/resource/resmgr/turf_digest/2020/ftd_fall_2020.pdf; Fall 2020; 5 pages.
In re Wingen; Feb. 9, 2023; 9 pages.
Bock , et al., “Plant Disease Severity Estimated Visually, by Digital Photography and Image Analysis, and by Hyperspectral Imaging”, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 29(2):59-107, 2010.
Braun , et al., “Performance and playability of experimental low-input coarse-textured zoysiagrass in multiple climates”, Grass Research, 1:10, 2021.
Dice, Lee R., “Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species”, Ecology, 26:297-302, 1945.
Kimball , et al., “Genetic Relationships in Zoysia Species and the Identification of Putative Interspecific Hybrids Using Simple Sequence Repeat Markers and Inflorescence Traits”, Crop Science, 53:285-295, 2013.
Moore , et al., “SSR Allelic Diversity Shifts in Zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp.) Cultivars Released from 1910 to 2016”, Crop Science, 57:S-1-S-12, 2017.
Rohlf, James F., “NTSYS-PC: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System: Getting Started Guide”, Department of Ecology and Evolution State University of New York, Version 2.2. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY. (2000) ; 43 pages.
Sokal , et al., “A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationships”, The University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 28(22): 1409-1438, 1958.