This disclosure relates to accelerometers.
Accelerometers function by detecting or preventing a displacement of a proof mass under inertial forces. In one example, an accelerometer may detect the displacement of a proof mass by the change in frequency of a double-ended tuning fork (DETF) connected between the proof mass and a support base. In this example, the tines of the DETF may be composed of a piezoelectric material or a silicon material. The DETF is a resonator, which is specifically designed to change frequency proportional to the load applied by the proof mass under acceleration. The DETF resonance is sustained through a plurality of electrodes connecting the DETF to an oscillator, which provides energy to the DETF satisfying the Barkhausen stability criterion.
In general, the disclosure is directed to devices, systems, and techniques that may enable a device to detect a strain on an accelerometer and compensate for the strain on the accelerometer. For example, an accelerometer configured in accordance with the techniques of this disclosure may include a strain-monitoring device, which may be configured to detect and monitor the strain of the accelerometer. In one example, the strain-monitoring device, which may include a double-ended tuning fork (DETF), may detect changes in the frequency of the tines of the DETF as the strain on the accelerometer varies, and provide data on the changes in frequency to a processor, which enables the processor to compensate an acceleration measurement from the accelerometer for the varying amount of strain on the accelerometer.
In some examples, the frequency of the strain-monitoring device is increased as the strain (e.g., tension) of the accelerometer increases. Conversely, the frequency of the strain-monitoring device is decreased as the strain (e.g., compression) of the accelerometer decreases. In some examples, the strain-monitoring device is located in a plane defined by the accelerometer. In some examples, the strain-monitoring device is made out of the same material as the accelerometer, such that the expansion coefficients between the strain-monitoring device and the accelerometer are nearly the same.
In one example, the disclosure is directed to a device comprising a proof mass, a support base configured to support the proof mass, wherein the proof mass is configured to displace in response to an acceleration of the device, a flexure configured to flexibly connect the proof mass to the support base, and a strain-monitoring device configured to measure an amount of strain on the support base.
In another example, the disclosure is directed to a method comprising receiving, by a processor from an accelerometer, an amount of strain on the accelerometer, receiving, by the processor from the accelerometer, an amount of acceleration of the accelerometer, determining, by the processor, based at least in part on the amount of strain on the accelerometer and the amount of acceleration, a modified acceleration value of the accelerometer, and outputting, by the processor, the modified acceleration value.
In another example, the disclosure is directed to a method of manufacturing an accelerometer, the method comprising masking a substrate with a photoresist, removing material from the substrate to form a plurality of features, wherein the plurality of features comprises a proof mass, a support base configured to support the proof mass, a flexure configured to flexibly connect the proof mass to the support base, and wherein the plurality of features are comprised essentially of the material, and forming a strain-monitoring device.
The details of one or more examples of the disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
An accelerometer measures acceleration of the accelerometer itself with respect to an inertial reference frame. An accelerometer with double-ended tuning forks (DETFs) use electromagnetic fields in conjunction with a piezoelectric DETF(s) and a movable proof mass to determine a change in displacement of the movable proof mass. The amount of displacement of the proof mass from a neutral position may be proportionate to the magnitude of the acceleration incident upon the accelerometer. However, the accuracy of some accelerometers drifts over time. These inaccuracies may arise from bias instabilities due to a Change in the physical structure of the device caused by Changes in the physical structure of the accelerometer. These changes may occur as a result of aging, strain or strain-relief, and/or time dependent thermal variations, and may include changes in the proof mass position.
Strains caused by stress-relief of material interfaces during device construction may be indistinguishable from acceleration signals. A persistent issue with constructed and modeled accelerometers is that the strain on the accelerometer changes with time as stresses in the construction of the accelerometer relieve. As the strain is variable over time, the model of the accelerometer performance generated by the performance algorithm over time may not accurately represent the behavior of the accelerometer. To prevent the strain from varying over time, some example accelerometer applications may contain a device which monitors temperature or has strain minimizing mechanisms, and the device may be used to indirectly compensate for thermal strains. However, these example accelerometer applications do not directly measure the amount of strain on the accelerometer; moreover, the applications fail to address the strains caused by stress-relief of material interfaces during device construction, and the accumulated inaccuracies of the performance model algorithm over time.
Techniques and devices are disclosed herein that may compensate for errors due to strain, such as strain caused by aging and/or thermal variation, by at least detecting the strain and adjusting the generated acceleration values based on the detected strain. For example, an accelerometer configured in accordance with the techniques of this disclosure may include a strain-monitoring device, which may be configured to detect and monitor the strain of the accelerometer. In some examples, the strain-monitoring device may provide information that may enable a processor to adjust the measured acceleration and compensate far the strain (e.g., increased or decreased strain) of the accelerometer. Such accelerometers may allow for a better performance model algorithm, which may enable a processor to better compensate for the strains placed on the accelerometer, and provide a more accurate acceleration measurement.
Accelerometers configured in accordance with techniques of this disclosure may be created with a single material, which may reduce the impact of time dependent thermal cycles and aging, as monolithic (e.g., single material) accelerometers have one expansion coefficient. That is, such accelerometers may be less subject to bias instabilities and may be more stable as compared to conventional accelerometers. Furthermore, accelerometers configured in accordance with techniques of this disclosure may allow for more accurate accelerometers to be created with a smaller profile and with reduced costs as the needs for preventing strain from construction and additional materials are significantly diminished.
Proof mass 2 is configured to displace in response to an acceleration of accelerometer 1. In some examples, proof mass 2 may move about the plane as defined by support base 10 due to the acceleration of accelerometer 1. In some examples, proof mass 2 is made of a piezoelectric material, such as quartz (SiO2), Berlinite (AlPO4), gallium orthophosphate (GaPO4), thermaline, barium titanate (BaTiO3), or lead zirconate titanate (PZT), zinc oxide (ZnO), or aluminum nitride (AlN), etc. In other examples, proof mass 2 is made of silicon. In some examples, proof mass 2 may move only in the plane as defined by support based 10 due to optional tether 12.
Tines 4 enable the detection of the amount of force e.g., increase or decrease of force) in accelerometer 1 by the change in their resonant frequency due to change in force on tines 4, In some examples, tines 4 are made of a piezoelectric material, such as quartz (SiO2), Berlinite (AlPO4), gallium orthophosphate (GaPO4), thermaline, barium titanate (BaTiO3), or lead zirconate titanate (PZT), zinc oxide (ZnO), or aluminum nitride (AlN), etc. In other examples, tines 4 are made of a silicon material. In some examples, tines 4 may be part of resonators 16A and 16B. For instance, tines 4 may be part of a double-ended tuning fork (DETF). In some examples, tines 4 may maintain vibration at a resonant frequency when placed in an electric field generated by a respective oscillator circuit. In this example, tines 4 vibrating at a resonant frequency may also have a change in frequency when a force (e.g., compression or tension) is placed on tines 4. In some examples, tines 4 are surrounded by a plurality of electrodes. For example, the plurality of electrodes may be adjacent to and/or underneath tines 4. In these examples, tines 4 may vibrate at their resonant frequency supported by an electric field provided by the plurality of electrodes in combination with respective oscillator circuits. In these examples, the respective oscillator circuits may be constructed such that resonators 16A and 16B may be a frequency determining element. As the frequency of each resonator 16A and 16B changes due to acceleration applied to the proof mass, the respective oscillator circuits in combination with the plurality of electrodes track the change as signal (e.g., a respective tine position pickoff signal), which may be amplified by the respective oscillator circuit to generate a respective resonator driver signal. The respective oscillator circuit maintains the resonance by supplying resonator 16A and 16B with a respective resonator drive signal in phase with the tine oscillations.
Flexure 6 flexibly connects proof mass 2 to support base 10. In some examples, flexure 6 may support proof mass 2 within support base 10. In some examples, flexure 6 is made of a piezoelectric material, such as quartz (SiO2), Berlinite (AlPO4), orthophosphate (GaPO4), thermaline, barium titanate (BaTiO3), or lead zirconate titanate (PZT), zinc oxide (ZnO), or aluminum nitride (AlN), etc. In other examples, flexure 6 is made of silicon. In some examples, flexure 6 may enable proof mass 2 to pivot about flexure 6 out of the plane defined by support base 10 due to acceleration of accelerometer 1.
Strain-monitoring devices 8 detect the strain (e.g., increase or decrease in strain) of the material of accelerometer 1 (e.g., the strain of support base 10). In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 is made of a piezoelectric material, such as quartz (SiO2), Berlinite (AlPO4), gallium orthophosphate (GaPO4), thermaline, barium titanate (BaTiO3), or lead zirconate titanate (PZT), zinc oxide (ZnO), or aluminum nitride (AlN), etc. In other examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may be made of silicon. In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may be piezoresistive, a crystalline quartz DETF, or of silicon construction.
In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may be a (DETF), similar to the resonators 16A and 16B. In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may be a metallized film, where a change in the resistance of strain-monitoring devices 8 will be indicative of the strain on accelerometer 1. In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may have one or more cantilevers at each end to allow for adjustment of the sensitivity of strain-monitoring devices 8, on that the frequency change of strain-monitoring devices 8 is a function of applied strain to be adjusted. In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may have one or more springs at one or more ends to allow for adjustment of the sensitivity of strain-tnonitoring devices 8, so that the frequency change of strain-monitoring devices 8 is a function of applied strain to be adjusted. In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may be located in the same plane (e.g., in-plane) as defined by support base 10. In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may be located in the same plane as tines 4, flexure 6, tether 12, and resonators 16A and 16B. In some examples, strain-monitoring devices 8 may include a plurality of electrodes connected to respective oscillator circuits.
Support base 10 provides support to proof mass 2 through flexure 6, resonators 16A and 16B, and tether 12, and may contain strains which may also displace proof mass 2. In some examples, support base 10 is made of a piezoelectric material, such as quartz (SiO2), Berlinite (AlPO4), gallium orthophosphate (GaPO4), thermaline, barium titanate (BaTiO3), or lead zirconate titanate (PZT), zinc oxide (ZnO), or aluminum nitride (AlN), etc. In other examples, support base 10 is made of silicon. In some examples, support base 10 may define a plane in which proof mass 2, tines 4, flexure 6, strain-monitoring devices 8, tether 12, and acceleration devices 16A and 16B are also located in the same plane. In some examples, support base 10 is a piece of monolithic material with a plurality of features etched to form a top layer of accelerometer 1. In some examples, support base 10 consists essentially of either quartz or silicon.
Tether 12, which is optional, attaches proof mass 2 to support base 10 and may restrict motion of proof mass 2, while still allowing proof mass 2 to pivot about the axis created by flexure 6 and tether 12. In some examples, tether 12 is made of a piezoelectric material, such as quartz (SiO2), Berlinite (AlPO4), gallium orthophosphate (GaPO4), thermaline, barium titanate (BaTiO3), or lead zirconate titanate (PZT), zinc oxide (ZnO), or aluminum nitride (AlN), etc. In other examples, tether 12 is made of silicon. In some examples, tether 12 is flexible about the plane defined by support base 10, but stiff in the direction in and out of the plane defined by support base 10.
Resonators 16A and 16B may be double-ended tuning forks (DETFs) with tines 4, which may detect the rotation of proof mass 2. Resonators 16A and 16B may also include electrodes 14A and 14B, which may partially surround a portion of tines 4. For example, electrodes 14A and 14B may be adjacent to or applied on tines 4. Each of resonators 16A and 16B may be connected to a respective oscillator circuit by electrodes 14A and 14B to sustain the resonance of tines 4.
Each of electrodes 14A and 14B includes a plurality of electrodes that drive tines 4 to maintain resonance of tines 4 and to detect the position of tines 4. Electrodes 14A and 14B, in combination with the respective oscillator circuit, provide a patterned electric field to cause tines 4 to maintain resonance of tines 4. Electrodes 14A and 14B adjacent to the corresponding tines 4 may detect the position of the corresponding tines 4 as a respective tine position pickoff signal. Electrodes 14A and 14B may be configured to detect the position of the corresponding tines 4 using capacitive, electromagnetic, or optical means. In some examples, the frequency associated with the respective tine position pickoff signal detected by electrodes 14A and 14B may be indicative of the resonant frequency of tines 4. Electrodes 14A and 14B may also provide the detected respective tine position pickoff signal to the respective oscillator circuit which amplifies the respective tine position pickoff to create a respective resonator drive signal. The respective oscillator circuits may provide the respective resonator drive signals to electrodes 14A and 14B to maintain resonance (e.g., in-plane and out-of-phase) of tines 4. The oscillator circuits may independently amplify the respective tine position pickoff signals, and provide the respective tine position pickoff signals as outputs to a processor. In this manner, electrodes 14A and 14B may detect the rotation of proof mass 2 by detecting the respective tine position pickoff signals, each respective tine position pickoff signal having a frequency indicative of a change in the resonant frequency of tines 4.
Electrodes 14A and 14B may include structures located on tines 4 or a base layer (not shown). For instance, electrodes 14A and 14B may include a plurality of electrodes that are vapor deposited on the base layer that surrounds tines 4 or may be applied by direct fusion bonding the base layer to support base 8. In some examples, electrodes 14A and 14B of a base layer may be applied by using braze materials, epoxies, or adhesives to bond the base layer to support base 8. In some examples, electrodes 14A and 14B may have charges from an attached electronics (e.g., an oscillator circuit, or the like) via wire bonding, and metallization patterns may be applied electrodes 14A and 14B through vacuum deposition.
The respective oscillator circuits may be part of accelerometer 1 and are constructed such that resonators 16A and 16B are the frequency determining elements. As the frequency of each resonator 16A and 16B changes due to acceleration applied to proof mass 2, the respective oscillator circuits track the change in each resonator 16A and 16B. Each respective oscillator circuit maintains the resonance of resonators 16A and 16B by supplying resonators 16A and 16B with appropriate energy, in phase with the tine 4 oscillations. For example, the respective oscillator circuits may maintain the resonance of tines 4 by using a detected instantaneous DETF tine position from electrodes 14A and 14B, e.g., respective tine position pickoff signals, and subsequently amplifying the respective tine position pickoff signals to create respective resonator drive signals, which are then applied to the corresponding resonators 16A and 16B using electrodes 14A and 14B. The frequency of resonators 16A and 16B may be a function of the load applied across tines 4 (e.g., by the movement of proof mass 2). In this manner, where the respective resonator drive signal is in phase with the respective tine position pickoff signal, the respective resonator drive signal satisfies the Barkhausen stability criterion.
Connection 38A and 38B are connection areas (e.g., zones of strain due to mounting connections) between accelerometer 1 and a housing (not shown). In some examples, connection 38A and 38B may be isolation elements that isolate accelerometer 1 from the housing. In some examples, connection 38A and 38B may be any location on support base 10 where strains increase or decrease. In some examples, connection 38A and 38B are where the changes in the strain of the accelerometer will have the greatest effect. In some examples, moving strain-monitoring devices 8 closer to or away from connection 38A and 38B would increase and decrease, respectively, the sensitivity of strain-monitoring devices 8.
Processor 18 as well as other processors disclosed herein can each comprise any suitable arrangement of hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof, to perform the techniques attributed to the respective processor 18 herein. For example, processor 18 may each include any one or more microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), or any other equivalent integrated or discrete logic circuitry, as well as any combinations of such components.
Processor 18 receives data from accelerometer 1. In some examples, processor 18 may receive data from accelerometer 1 indicative of an amount of strain on accelerometer 1. In some examples, processor 18 may receive data from accelerometer 1 indicative of an amount of acceleration of accelerometer 1. In these examples, processor 18 may use the data from accelerometer 1 to determine a modified acceleration value based on the amount of strain on accelerometer 1 and the amount of acceleration of accelerometer 1.
In the example of
Strain-monitoring devices 8 may monitor the strain on accelerometer 1 by, for example, monitoring the strain-induced change in the frequency of the DETF. In some examples, the strain-induced change in frequency of strain-monitoring devices 8 may be incorporated into a performance model algorithm used to determine the measured acceleration of the accelerometer. By introducing the strain-induced change in frequency of strain-monitoring devices 8 into the performance algorithm, the performance may gain an additional degree of freedom, such that another dimension (e.g., an independent parameter) of the accelerometer is known, enabling the performance algorithm to reduce or eliminate degradation of the acceleration measurements due to the effects of strain on accelerometer 1. In other words, by incorporating the change in frequency of the strain-monitoring devices 8 into the performance algorithm that determines the acceleration detected by accelerometer 1, the performance algorithm has one less unknown variable. In some examples, direct measurement of the strain measurement of the strain change can be made with no isolation mechanisms surrounding the strain-monitoring devices 8. In instances where it is desired to reduce the amplitude of the strain-monitoring signal, strain-monitoring devices 8 may be isolated to an adjustable degree by use of one or more flexible cantilevers and/or springs. In other examples where it is desired to reduce the amplitude of the strain-monitoring signal, strain-monitoring devices 8 may be isolated from thermal effects by a zero gauge length configuration (e.g., where the length of strain-monitoring devices 8 negates any thermal effects).
In some examples, the orientation (e.g., the direction) of strain-monitoring devices 8 may be based on where the strains are most likely to occur on accelerometer 1. In the example of
Accelerometer 1 may be configured in accordance with techniques of this disclosure to provide for a better performance model algorithm, which may enable processor 18 to better compensate for the strains placed on the accelerometer. In general, accelerometer 1 includes mounting strains, expansion coefficients, and epoxies, which may change their state over time. However, as the states of the mounting strains, expansion coefficients, and epoxies may change, the strain of accelerometer 1 may also change, which may offset the original model of the accelerometer. By providing one or more strain-monitoring devices, such as strain-monitoring devices 8, there may be a reduction in the amount of accelerometer calibrations. Moreover, strain-monitoring devices 8 may detect the strains in the material of accelerometer 1, which may also provide a more accurate determination of the actual strain instead of minimizing the effect of thermal strains.
In the example of
In the example of
In general, as strains are created or relieved at connections 38A and/or 38B the corresponding strains on tines 4 may be created or relieved, and the resonant frequency of tines 4 may change, and the change may be indicative of the strain on accelerometer 1. As strains are created or relieved anywhere in accelerometer 1, the strains on tines 4 may also be created or relieved, and the resonant frequency of tines 4 may change, such that the change may be indicative of the strain on accelerometer 1. In other examples, the resonant frequency of tines 4 may not change, which may be an indication of the strain on accelerometer 1.
To reduce or eliminate the performance degradation of accelerometer 1, at least one strain-monitoring devices 8, such as a DETF (e.g., DETF 28 as described in
Base layer 64 may provide support to support base 60 of accelerometer 50 with mesas 72A and 72B. In some examples, base layer 64 is made of a piezoelectric material, such as quartz (SiO2), Berlinite (AlPO4), gallium orthophosphate (GaPO4), thermaline, barium titanate (BaTiO3), or lead zirconate titanate (PZT), zinc oxide (ZnO), or aluminum nitride (AlN), etc. In other examples, base layer 64 is made of silicon. In some examples, base layer 64 may be constructed separately from support base 60. In some examples, base layer 64 may be attached to support base 60 by brazing or other attachment techniques, such as fusion bonding.
Acceleration electrodes 68 represent the metallization surfaces of base layer 64 to form electrodes located underneath and adjacent to the tines of DETFs 66A and 66B. In some examples, acceleration electrodes 68 may be metallized in vacuum evaporator with shadow mask on to base layer 64. In some examples, acceleration electrodes may be made of a conductive metal, such as gold. In some examples, the acceleration electrodes 68 (e.g., acceleration electrodes 68A, 68B, 68C, 68D, 68E, 68F, 68G, and 68H) in combination with respective oscillator circuits may provide a patterned electric field to cause the tines of DETF 66 to vibrate at a resonant frequency (e.g., in plane and out-of-phase). In some examples, acceleration electrodes 68 (e.g., acceleration electrodes 68A, 68B, 68C, 68D, 68E, and 68F) may detect a signal indicative of the tines of DETFs 66A and 66B, and a frequency of the signal may be indicative of the resonant frequency of the tines. In this manner, acceleration electrodes 68 in combination with respective oscillator circuits may be configured to drive the tines of DETFs 66A and 68B and detect changes in the resonant frequency of the tines caused by forces received from displacement of the proof mass. In some examples, acceleration electrodes 68 may correspond to electrodes 14A and 14B as described in
Strain electrodes 70 represent the metallization surfaces of base layer 64 to form electrodes located underneath and adjacent to the tines of DETF 58. In some examples, strain electrodes 70 may be metallized in a vacuum evaporator with shadow mask on to base layer 64. In some examples, strain electrodes 70 may be made of gold. In some examples, strain electrodes 70 (e.g., strain electrodes 70A-70F) in combination with an oscillator circuit may provide an electric field to vibrate the tines of DETF 58 at a resonant frequency (e.g., in plane and out-of-phase). In some examples, strain electrodes 70 (e.g., strain electrodes 70A-70F) may detect a signal indicative of the tines of DETF 58, and a frequency of the signal may be indicative of the resonant frequency of the tines. In this manner, strain electrodes 70 in combination with an oscillator circuit may be configured to drive the tines of DETF 58 and detect changes in the resonant frequency of the tines caused by strains received from strain creation or relief in accelerometer 1. In some examples, acceleration electrodes 68 may correspond to electrodes 14A and 14B as described in
Mesas 72A and 72B represent the distance necessary between the tines of DETFs 58, 66A and 66B, and acceleration electrodes 68 and strain electrodes 70 respectively, so the tines of DETFs 58, 66A, and 66B may vibrate freely, while still maintaining the electric field from acceleration electrodes 68 and strain electrodes 70. In one example, mesas 72A and 72B separate the tines from their respective electrodes by a distance of two to five thousandths of an inch. In another example, mesas 72A and 72B may have a height equal to the thickness of the tines.
In some examples, the orientation (e.g., the direction) of DETF 28 may be based on where the strains are most likely to occur. In some examples, DETF 28A may be within a threshold number of degrees of perpendicular (e.g., between 75° and 105°, within plus or minus 15 degrees of perpendicular, etc.) to DETFs 16A and 16B, and DETFs 16A and 16B may be within a threshold number of degrees of parallel (e.g., between 165° and 195°, within plus or minus 15 degrees of parallel, etc.) to each other. In some examples, DETF 28B may be within a threshold number of degrees of parallel (e.g., between 165° and 195°, within plus or minus 15 degrees of parallel, etc.) to DETFs 16A and 16B. In some examples, based on the manner of attaching accelerometer 1 to the housing, a strain pattern can be used to orient DETF 28. DETF 28 may also have a strain state, such as state zero, where DETF 28 vibrates at a first frequency. For example, if tension (e.g., an increase in the strain on accelerometer 1) is applied to DETF 28 the frequency increases from the first frequency. Conversely, if compression (e.g., a decrease in the strain on accelerometer 1) is applied to DETF 28 the frequency decreases from the first frequency.
The island between tines 24 contains electrodes that detect as a signal the position of tines 24, such that the any changes in the electric field are an indication of a change of strain on tines 24. The electrodes may correspond to electrodes 14A and 14B as described in
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
In the example of
A processor (e.g., processor 18 as described in
The processor (e.g., processor 18 as described in
The processor (e.g., processor 18 as described in
In one or more examples, the functions described may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented in software, the functions may be stored on or transmitted over, as one or more instructions or code, a computer-readable medium and executed by a hardware-based processing unit. Computer-readable media may include computer-readable storage media, which corresponds to a tangible medium such as data storage media, or communication media including any medium that facilitates transfer of a computer program from one place to another, e.g., according to a communication protocol. In this manner, computer-readable media generally may correspond to (1) tangible computer-readable storage media which is non-transitory or (2) a communication medium such as a signal or carrier wave. Data storage media may be any available media that can be accessed by one or more computers or one or more processors to retrieve instructions, code and/or data structures for implementation of the techniques described in this disclosure. A computer program product may include a computer-readable medium.
By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable storage media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage, or other magnetic storage devices, flash memory, or any other medium that can be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer. Also, any connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. For example, if instructions are transmitted from a website, server, or other remote source using a coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, digital subscriber line (DSL), or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave, then the coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, twisted pair, DSL, or wireless technologies such as infrared, radio, and microwave are included in the definition of medium. It should be understood, however, that computer-readable storage media and data storage media do not include connections, carrier waves, signals, or other transient media, but are instead directed to non-transient, tangible storage media. Disk and disc, as used herein, includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and Blu-ray disc, where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
Instructions may be executed by one or more processors, such as one or more digital signal processors (DSPs), general purpose microprocessors, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable logic arrays (FPGAs), or other equivalent integrated or discrete logic circuitry. Accordingly, the term “processor,” as used herein may refer to any of the foregoing structure or any other structure suitable for implementation of the techniques described herein. In addition, in some aspects, the functionality described herein may be provided within dedicated hardware and/or software modules configured for encoding and decoding, or incorporated in a combined codec. Also, the techniques could be fully implemented in one or more circuits or logic elements.
The techniques of this disclosure may be implemented in a wide variety of devices or apparatuses, an integrated circuit (IC) or a set of ICs (e.g., a chip set). Various components, modules, or units are described in this disclosure to emphasize functional aspects of devices configured to perform the disclosed techniques, but do not necessarily require realization by different hardware units. Rather, as described above, various units may be combined in a codec hardware unit or provided by a collection of interoperative hardware units, including one or more processors as described above, in conjunction with suitable software and/or firmware.
Various examples of the disclosure have been described. These and other examples are within the scope of the following claims. the support base.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4498344 | Dinger | Feb 1985 | A |
4879914 | Norling | Nov 1989 | A |
4901586 | Blake et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4939935 | Amand | Jul 1990 | A |
5005413 | Novack et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5265473 | Funabashi | Nov 1993 | A |
5379639 | Hulsing, II et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5458000 | Burns | Oct 1995 | A |
5594170 | Peters | Jan 1997 | A |
5783973 | Weinberg et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5969249 | Roessig et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6145380 | MacGugan | Nov 2000 | A |
6230565 | Foote | May 2001 | B1 |
6248610 | Leonardson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6453744 | Williams | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6484578 | Woodruff et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6595054 | Paros et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6634231 | Malametz | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6662658 | Foote | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6826960 | Schaad et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7178401 | Byrd | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7467553 | Meyer | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7954215 | Saito | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8955382 | Dwyer et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9261525 | Thiruvenkatanathan et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20030196489 | Dwyer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060225506 | Madni et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070236213 | Paden et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090241665 | Novack | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100186515 | Sakurai | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110100125 | Sato | May 2011 | A1 |
20110234206 | Kawakubo | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120132003 | Comi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120192649 | Strehlow et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120227492 | Dwyer | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130298675 | Thiruvenkatanathan et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130333175 | Acar et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140253219 | Caffee et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0674761 | Oct 1997 | EP |
04363670 | Dec 1992 | JP |
2006039560 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Lee, J.E.-Y. et al., “An axial strain modulated double-ended tuning fork electrometer,” Elsevier Sensors and Actuators A 148, Sep. 2008, pp. 395-400. |
Seshia, A.A. et al., “A Vacuum Packaged Surface Micromachined Resonant Accelerometer,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 11, No. 6, Dec. 2002, pp. 784-793. |
Extended Search Report from counterpart European Application No. 15193762.0, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 7 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,323, by Honeywell International Inc. (Inventors: Stephen F. Becka), filed Nov. 14, 2014. |
Response to Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2016, from U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,323, filed Dec. 9, 2016, 9 pp. |
Response to Extended European Search Report and Opinion, pursuant to Rule 62 EPC, dated Apr. 8, 2016, from counterpart European Application No. EP 15193762.0, filed on Nov. 9, 2016, 52 pp. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC from counterpart European Application No. 15193762.0, dated Dec. 7, 2016, 3 pp. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,323, dated Sep. 16, 2016, 13 pp. |
Response to Article 94(3) EPC Communication dated Dec. 7, 2016, from counterpart European Application No. EP 15193762.0, filed on Apr. 3, 2017, 6 pp. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,323, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 5 pp. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,323, dated Feb. 3, 2017, 12 pp. |
Notice of Intention to Grant from European Application No. 15193760.4, dated Jan. 26, 2017, 37 pp. |
Office Action, and translation thereof, from counterpart Chinese Application No. 201510774038.9, dated Feb. 2, 2019, 20 pp. |
Second Office Action and Search Report, and translation thereof, from counterpart Chinese Application No. 201510774038.9, dated Oct. 11, 2019, 21 pp. |
Translation of Response to First Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2019, from counterpart Chinese Application No. 201510774038.9, filed Jun. 17, 2019, 3 pp. |
Response to Second Office Action, and translation thereof, dated Dec. 6, 2019, from counterpart Chinese Application No. 201510774038.9, filed Dec. 25, 2019, 11 pp. |
Third Office Action and Search Report, and translation thereof, from counterpart Chinese Application No. 201510774038.9, dated Apr. 24, 2020, 23 pp. |
Intent to Grant from counterpart European Patent Application No. 15193762.0, dated Jan. 23, 2018, 72 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160139170 A1 | May 2016 | US |