The identification and separation of specialized circulating cells, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or pathogenic cells such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) is very desirable for advancing the knowledge of cancer types, for diagnostics, and for monitoring the progress of cancer treatments.
One conventional method of identifying and separating specialized circulating cells utilizes different fluorescent materials to tag different cells based on their specific surface chemistry. The cells are then sorted based on their different fluorescent colors. This method, however, attaches secondary molecules to the cell of interest and may modify the surface characteristics of the cells, which is undesirable. Other methods of locating rare cells in circulation involve video or microscopy techniques, which are painstaking and very time-consuming processes.
Diagnostic applications for specialized circulating cells typically require the ability to be used with small analysis volumes. In addition, reagents for such applications are very expensive. Because only a small number of target cells are contained in the specimen and they are at low concentrations, high sensitivity (i.e. the ability to correctly identify the target cells) and high specificity (i.e. the ability to correctly identify cells that are not the target cells) are desirable.
It would therefore be desirable to provide methods for both identification and segmentation or separation of rare cell types for both diagnostic and treatment purposes. A ready-to-operate system for both identification and segmentation or separation of rare cell types for both diagnostic and treatment purposes is likewise desirable. Diagnostic systems and methods that enhance sensitivity are desirable, in addition to systems and method with high specificity, as incorrect identification causes incorrect or unnecessary treatment.
The present disclosure relates, in various embodiments, to systems and methods of identification and separation of target cells such as specialized circulating cells and/or rare cell types, such as pathogenic cells, utilizing acoustic manipulation via acoustic standing waves. These systems and methods are useful for various diagnostic and treatment purposes, including pathogen detection in blood, and trapping and characterization of specialized circulating cells, such as CTCs. Briefly, the use of an acoustic standing allows for contact-free manipulation of cells, thereby increasing sensitivity because of the elimination of contact with surfaces, which are the main channel of losses of cells and reagents. Additionally, acoustic manipulation allows for high local concentrations of analytes at large microfluidic volumes, which enhances sensitivity, lowers costs, and simplifies the design. Finally, the acoustic manipulation systems and methods described herein advantageously possess the potential for automation of the manipulation of particles or cells through the combination of fluid flows and acoustic pressure using an acoustic standing wave.
In accordance with the present disclosure, methods are disclosed for inspecting, detecting, isolating, monitoring, characterizing, or separating pathogens from a fluid (e.g. in blood or its derivatives, containing blood cells). The method comprises flowing the fluid containing the pathogens through an acoustic manipulation device. The fluid may be diluted, such as up to ten times its original concentration. The fluid may also be stratified through the use of a centrifuge and then separated prior to introduction into the acoustic separation device. The stratified layers may be treated separately. For example, in blood, one typically stratified layer is known as the “buffy coat” and contains the white cells and platelets in the blood sample. The white cells are neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes. The lymphocytes can contain T cells, B cells and NK cells. The acoustic manipulation device comprises a flow chamber having a solvent inlet and at least one host-fluid inlet at a first end of the flow chamber, and a particulate outlet and at least one residual outlet at a second end of the flow chamber opposite the first end thereof, wherein the solvent inlet and the particulate outlet are aligned with a longitudinal axis of the flow chamber and the at least one host-fluid inlet and the at least one residual outlet are spaced apart from the longitudinal axis; at least one ultrasonic transducer located on a wall of the flow chamber, the at least one ultrasonic transducer including a piezoelectric material driven by a voltage signal to create an acoustic standing wave in the flow chamber; and a reflector located on a wall on the opposite side of the flow chamber from the at least one ultrasonic transducer. The flow chamber may alternatively be shaped to form a resonant chamber. The method further comprises sending a voltage signal to drive the at least one ultrasonic transducer to create the acoustic standing wave in the flow chamber to drive the pathogens toward the longitudinal axis where the pathogens become trapped in the acoustic standing wave; introducing a solvent into the flow chamber through the solvent inlet; and removing the pathogens from the device through the particulate outlet.
In particular embodiments, the acoustic manipulation device further comprises at least one buffer inlet located between the solvent inlet and the at least one host-fluid inlet. The method may further comprise introducing a buffer into the flow chamber through the at least one buffer inlet, the buffer creating a buffer layer that permits the pathogens to pass therethrough but destroys other cells as they pass therethrough. The buffer can be a selective lytic buffer (e.g., mild detergents). Alternatively, an osmotic shock can be employed to create the buffer layer. If cells (e.g., mammalian cells) are passed through a solvent having a low salt concentration, the cells are generally caused to explode while the bacteria survives due to its cellular walls. Note that for acoustical purposes, the change of the density due to the decrease of salt concentration could be compensated with agents that can increase the solvent density without changing its osmolality (e.g., Ficoll, Histodenz).
The method may further comprise removing the solvent from the device through the residual outlet. The solvent may be a bacteria-friendly solvent (e.g., saline, culture broth).
In certain constructions, the piezoelectric material can include a plurality of piezoelectric elements arranged in an array, the plurality of piezoelectric elements operated between active and inactive modes such that the pathogens are trapped above the piezoelectric elements in the active mode. The method may further comprise switching the piezoelectric elements between the active and inactive modes to move the pathogens trapped in the acoustic standing wave along the longitudinal axis from the first end to the second end of the flow chamber to the particulate outlet.
According to the present disclosure, another method is disclosed for inspecting, detecting, isolating, or characterizing specialized circulating cells (e.g., CTCs, stem cells, CAR T cells) in a host fluid containing the targeted cells (e.g. blood containing blood cells). The method comprises flowing the host fluid containing the targeted cells through an acoustic manipulation device. The acoustic manipulation device comprises a flow chamber having at least one inlet and at least one outlet; at least one ultrasonic transducer located on a wall of the flow chamber, the at least one ultrasonic transducer including a piezoelectric material driven by a voltage signal to create an acoustic standing wave in the flow chamber; and a transparent wall forming a wall of the flow chamber opposite the at least one ultrasonic transducer. In certain embodiments, a cover glass may be required for high-resolution, high-sensitivity detection employing oil-immersed objectives. In other embodiments, objectives with lower magnification and long working distance may not require a cover glass. The method further comprises sending a voltage signal to drive the at least one ultrasonic transducer to create the acoustic standing wave in the flow chamber, and attaching acoustically active particles (e.g., microbubbles or paramagnetic particles having an affinity ligand attached) to the specialized circulating cells, the acoustically active particles being driven by the acoustic standing wave toward the transparent wall where the specialized circulating cells and attached microbubbles become trapped in the acoustic standing wave. A microscope objective is used to examine the cells through the transparent wall.
In particular embodiments, the at least one inlet includes a solvent inlet and at least one host-fluid inlet at a first end of the flow chamber, and the at least one outlet includes a particulate outlet and at least one residual outlet at a second end of the flow chamber opposite the first end thereof, wherein the solvent inlet and the particulate outlet are aligned with a longitudinal axis of the flow chamber and the at least one host-fluid inlet and the at least one residual outlet are spaced apart from the longitudinal axis.
The acoustic manipulation device may further comprise at least one buffer inlet located between the solvent inlet and the at least one host-fluid inlet. The method may further comprise introducing a dividing buffer into the flow chamber through the at least one buffer inlet. A substantially acoustically transparent layer may be present between the cover glass and the flow chamber. The substantially acoustically transparent layer can include one or more wells therein.
The piezoelectric material may include a plurality of piezoelectric elements arranged in an array, the plurality of piezoelectric elements configured to operate between active and inactive modes such that the targeted cells are trapped above the piezoelectric elements in the active mode. The method may further comprise switching the piezoelectric elements between the active and inactive modes to position the targeted cells trapped in the acoustic standing wave in alignment with the microscope objective. The substantially acoustically transparent layer can include one or more wells therein. The method may further comprise switching the piezoelectric elements between the active and inactive modes to position the targeted cells trapped in the acoustic standing wave in the wells of the substantially acoustically transparent layer.
The targeted cells can be specialized circulating cells, such as circulating tumor cells.
Acoustophoretic devices are also disclosed. In one embodiment, an acoustophoretic device comprises a flow chamber having a solvent inlet and at least one host-fluid inlet at a first end of the flow chamber, and a particulate outlet and at least one residual outlet at a second end of the flow chamber opposite the first end thereof, wherein the solvent inlet and the particulate outlet are aligned with a longitudinal axis of the flow chamber and the at least one host-fluid inlet and the at least one residual outlet are spaced apart from the longitudinal axis; at least one ultrasonic transducer located on a wall of the flow chamber, the at least one ultrasonic transducer including a piezoelectric material driven by a voltage signal to create an acoustic standing wave in the flow chamber; and a reflector located on a wall on the opposite side of the flow chamber from the at least one ultrasonic transducer.
In particular embodiments, the acoustophoretic device further comprises at least one buffer inlet located between the solvent inlet and the at least one host-fluid inlet.
The piezoelectric material may include a plurality of piezoelectric elements arranged in an array, the plurality of piezoelectric elements configured to operate between active and inactive modes.
The flow chamber can be disposable.
In certain constructions, the at least one ultrasonic transducer comprises a housing having a top end, a bottom end, and an interior volume; and a piezoelectric crystal at the bottom end of the housing having an exposed exterior surface and an interior surface, the crystal being able to vibrate when driven by a voltage signal. In some embodiments, no backing layer is present within the housing of the at least one ultrasonic transducer, and an air gap is present in the interior volume between the crystal and a top plate at the top end of the housing. In other embodiments, the at least one ultrasonic transducer further comprises a backing layer contacting the interior surface of the crystal, the backing layer being made of a substantially acoustically transparent material.
In a second embodiment, an acoustophoretic device comprises a flow chamber having at least one inlet and at least one outlet; at least one ultrasonic transducer located on a wall of the flow chamber, the at least one ultrasonic transducer including a piezoelectric material driven by a voltage signal to create an acoustic standing wave in the flow chamber; and a transparent wall forming a portion of the flow chamber opposite the at least one ultrasonic transducer. The flow chamber may also or alternatively include a transducer and a resonant chamber, with no specific reflector component opposite the transducer.
In particular embodiments, the at least one inlet includes a solvent inlet and at least one host-fluid inlet at a first end of the flow chamber, and the at least one outlet includes a particulate outlet and at least one residual outlet at a second end of the flow chamber opposite the first end thereof, wherein the solvent inlet and the particulate outlet are aligned with a longitudinal axis of the flow chamber and the at least one host-fluid inlet and the at least one residual outlet are spaced apart from the longitudinal axis.
The acoustophoretic device may further comprise at least one buffer inlet located between the solvent inlet and the at least one host-fluid inlet. A substantially acoustically transparent layer may be present between the transparent wall and the interior volume of the flow chamber.
The piezoelectric material may include a plurality of piezoelectric elements arranged in an array, the plurality of piezoelectric elements configured to operate between active and inactive modes.
The flow chamber can be disposable.
In certain constructions, the at least one ultrasonic transducer comprises a housing having a top end, a bottom end, and an interior volume; and a piezoelectric crystal at the bottom end of the housing having an exposed exterior surface and an interior surface, the crystal being able to vibrate when driven by a voltage signal. In some embodiments, no backing layer is present within the housing of the at least one ultrasonic transducer, and an air gap is present in the interior volume between the crystal and a top plate at the top end of the housing. In other embodiments, the at least one ultrasonic transducer further comprises a backing layer contacting the interior surface of the crystal, the backing layer being made of a substantially acoustically transparent material.
In particular embodiments of the methods and devices according to the present disclosure, the acoustic standing wave may be a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave. Examples of such multi-dimensional acoustic standing waves can be found in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 9,228,183, the entire contents being hereby fully incorporated by reference. In other embodiments of the methods and devices according to the present disclosure, the acoustic standing wave can be a planar acoustic standing wave. Further yet, in particular embodiments, the acoustic standing wave may be a combination of a planar acoustic standing wave and a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave, where the planar acoustic standing wave and multidimensional acoustic standing wave are super positioned on each other.
These and other non-limiting characteristics are more particularly described below.
The following is a brief description of the drawings, which are presented for the purposes of illustrating the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein and not for the purposes of limiting the same.
The present disclosure may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of desired embodiments and the examples included therein. In the following specification and the claims which follow, reference will be made to a number of terms which shall be defined to have the following meanings.
Although specific terms are used in the following description for the sake of clarity, these terms are intended to refer only to the particular structure of the embodiments selected for illustration in the drawings, and are not intended to define or limit the scope of the disclosure. In the drawings and the following description below, it is to be understood that like numeric designations refer to components of like function.
The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The term “comprising” is used herein as requiring the presence of the named component and allowing the presence of other components. The term “comprising” should be construed to include the term “consisting of”, which allows the presence of only the named component, along with any impurities that might result from the manufacture of the named component.
Numerical values should be understood to include numerical values which are the same when reduced to the same number of significant figures and numerical values which differ from the stated value by less than the experimental error of conventional measurement technique of the type described in the present application to determine the value.
All ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the recited endpoint and independently combinable (for example, the range of “from 2 grams to 10 grams” is inclusive of the endpoints, 2 grams and 10 grams, and all the intermediate values). The endpoints of the ranges and any values disclosed herein are not limited to the precise range or value; they are sufficiently imprecise to include values approximating these ranges and/or values.
The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context. When used in the context of a range, the modifier “about” should also be considered as disclosing the range defined by the absolute values of the two endpoints. For example, the range of from about 2 to about 10% also discloses the range “from 2 to 10.” The term “about” may refer to plus or minus 10% of the indicated number. For example, “about 10%” may indicate a range of 9% to 11%, and “about 1” may mean from 0.9-1.1.
It should be noted that many of the terms used herein are relative terms. For example, the terms “upper” and “lower” are relative to each other in location, i.e. an upper component is located at a higher elevation than a lower component in a given orientation, but these terms can change if the device is flipped. The terms “inlet” and “outlet” are relative to a fluid flowing through them with respect to a given structure, e.g. a fluid flows through the inlet into the structure and flows through the outlet out of the structure. The terms “upstream” and “downstream” are relative to the direction in which a fluid flows through various components, i.e. the flow fluids through an upstream component prior to flowing through the downstream component. It should be noted that in a loop, a first component can be described as being both upstream of and downstream of a second component.
The terms “horizontal” and “vertical” are used to indicate direction relative to an absolute reference, i.e. ground level. However, these terms should not be construed to require structures to be absolutely parallel or absolutely perpendicular to each other. For example, a first vertical structure and a second vertical structure are not necessarily parallel to each other. The terms “top” and “bottom” or “base” are used to refer to surfaces where the top is always higher than the bottom/base relative to an absolute reference, i.e. the surface of the earth. The terms “upwards” and “downwards” are also relative to an absolute reference; upwards is always against the gravity of the earth.
The term “parallel” should be construed in its lay sense of two surfaces that maintain a generally constant distance between them, and not in the strict mathematical sense that such surfaces will never intersect when extended to infinity.
The present application refers to “the same order of magnitude.” Two numbers are of the same order of magnitude if the quotient of the larger number divided by the smaller number is a value of at least 1 and less than 10.
Acoustophoresis is the separation of particles and secondary fluids from a primary or host fluid using high intensity acoustic standing waves, and without the use of membranes or physical size exclusion filters. It has been known that high intensity standing waves of sound can exert forces on particles in a fluid when there is a differential in both density and/or compressibility, otherwise known as the acoustic contrast factor. The pressure profile in a standing wave contains areas of local minimum pressure amplitudes at its nodes and local maxima at its anti-nodes. Depending on the density and compressibility of the particles, they will be trapped at the nodes or anti-nodes of the standing wave. Generally, the higher the frequency of the standing wave, the smaller the particles that can be trapped due the pressure of the standing wave.
When acoustic standing waves propagate in liquids, the fast oscillations may generate a non-oscillating force on particles suspended in the liquid or on an interface between liquids. This force is known as the acoustic radiation force. The force originates from the non-linearity of the propagating wave. As a result of the non-linearity, the wave is distorted as it propagates and the time-averages are nonzero. By serial expansion (according to perturbation theory), the first non-zero term will be the second-order term, which accounts for the acoustic radiation force. The acoustic radiation force on a particle, or a cell, in a fluid suspension is a function of the difference in radiation pressure on either side of the particle or cell. The physical description of the radiation force is a superposition of the incident wave and a scattered wave, in addition to the effect of the non-rigid particle oscillating with a different speed compared to the surrounding medium thereby radiating a wave. The following equation presents an analytical expression for the acoustic radiation force on a particle, or cell, in a fluid suspension in a planar standing wave.
where βm is the compressibility of the fluid medium, ρ is density, φ is acoustic contrast factor, Vp is particle volume, λ is wavelength, k is 2π/λ, P0 is acoustic pressure amplitude, x is the axial distance along the standing wave (i.e., perpendicular to the wave front), and
where ρp is the particle density, ρm is the fluid medium density, βp is the compressibility of the particle, and βm is the compressibility of the fluid medium.
For a multi-dimensional standing wave, the acoustic radiation force is a three-dimensional force field, and one method to calculate the force is Gor'kov's method, where the primary acoustic radiation force FR is defined as a function of a field potential U, FV=−∇(U), where the field potential U is defined as
and f1 and f2 are the monopole and dipole contributions defined by
where
where ρ is the acoustic pressure, u is the fluid particle velocity, Λ is the ratio of cell density ρp to fluid density ρf, σ is the ratio of cell sound speed cp to fluid sound speed cf, Vo is the volume of the cell, and < > indicates time averaging over the period of the wave.
The present disclosure relates to acoustophoretic devices and methods that employ multi-dimensional ultrasonic acoustic standing waves, planar acoustic standing waves or combinations of planar and multidimensional acoustic standing waves (collectively referred to herein simple as acoustic standing waves) to separate cells and/or other particles from the fluid surrounding them. This can be useful for diagnostic applications.
The acoustophoretic or acoustically active devices of the present disclosure can be used for the extraction of bacteria from a mixture of bacteria and cells (e.g., mammalian cells). Examples of other applications of the acoustophoretic devices of the present disclosure include detecting contamination of cell cultures or for separation of impurities from fluids in the food and beverage industry. The acoustophoretic or acoustically active devices of the present disclosure can also be used to diagnose and treat blood infections. For example, a volume of blood (e.g., 10 milliliters) drained from a patient can be split into two separate samples for bacteria and yeast detection. Half of the blood is then injected into an appropriate culture bottle and submitted to a blood culturing system (e.g., BACTEC) for growth. Once the pathogens in the blood grow to sufficient concentration, a sample aliquot is then analyzed by a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MALDI-TOF MS). The typical pathogen concentration is about one to two pathogens per milliliter. Thus, for a five milliliter blood sample in a 50 milliliter bottle, the sample begins with about five to ten pathogens. Growth in the blood culturing system is generally complete at about 106 to about 107 pathogens per milliliter, which takes about 20 to 24 generations, or about 10 to 12 hours. Generally, the volume of sample required for mass spectrometry is about 1 microliter. Time-to-answer is critical in blood infections, because the more developed sepsis becomes, the more difficult it is to treat the infection, and the progressing bacteremia can induce septic shock.
In particular,
The flow chamber 110 is the region of the device 100 through which is flowed the fluid sample, containing both mammalian and bacterial cells (e.g., blood containing blood cells and bacteria, yeast, or specialized circulating cells), or more generally, the host fluid contains both target cells (to be separated from the host fluid) and non-target cells (which are to remain with the host fluid). The flow chamber 110 includes a solvent inlet 112, at least one host-fluid inlet 114, a particulate outlet 116, at least one residual outlet 118, and at least one buffer inlet 119.
The solvent inlet 112, the at least one host-fluid inlet 114, and the at least one buffer inlet 119 are located at a first end 111 of the flow chamber 110. The at least one buffer inlet 119 is located between the solvent inlet 112 and the at least one host-fluid inlet 114. The particulate outlet 116 and the at least one residual outlet 118 are located at a second end 113 of the flow chamber 110. As seen in
In the embodiment of
The ultrasonic transducer 120 of the device 100 is located on wall 122 of the flow chamber 110. The reflector 130 of the device 100 is located on wall 132 of the flow chamber 110. As seen in
Prior to discussing further optimization of the systems, it is helpful to provide an explanation now of how multi-dimensional acoustic standing waves are generated. The multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave is obtained by driving an ultrasonic transducer at a frequency that both generates the acoustic standing wave and excites a fundamental 3D vibration mode of the transducer piezoelectric element. Perturbation of the piezoelectric element in an ultrasonic transducer in a multimode fashion allows for generation of a multidimensional acoustic standing wave. A piezoelectric element can be specifically designed to deform in a multimode fashion at designed frequencies, allowing for generation of a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave. The multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave may be generated by distinct modes of the piezoelectric element such as a 3×3 mode that would generate multidimensional acoustic standing waves. A multitude of multidimensional acoustic standing waves may also be generated by allowing the piezoelectric element to vibrate through many different mode shapes. Thus, the element would excite multiple modes such as a 0×0 mode (i.e. a piston mode) to a 1×1, 2×2, 1×3, 3×1, 3×3, and other higher order modes and then cycle back through the lower modes of the element (not necessarily in straight order). This switching or dithering of the element between modes allows for various multi-dimensional wave shapes, along with a single piston mode shape, to be generated over a designated time.
It is also possible to excite or choose a frequency of excitation that excites multiple modes at the same time, each mode with a varying degree of displacement amplitude. Through this combination of multiple modes excited at the same time with varying displacement amplitude, it is possible to generate a superposition of multi-dimensional standing waves desirable for trapping, clustering, and separation of a secondary fluid or particle from a host fluid.
The scattering of the acoustic field off the particles results in a three dimensional acoustic radiation force, which acts as a three-dimensional trapping field. The acoustic radiation force is proportional to the particle volume (e.g. the cube of the radius) when the particle is small relative to the wavelength. It is proportional to frequency and the acoustic contrast factor. It also scales with acoustic energy (e.g. the square of the acoustic pressure amplitude). When the acoustic radiation force exerted on the particles is stronger than the combined effect of fluid drag force and buoyancy and gravitational force, the particles are trapped within the acoustic standing wave field. This can result in the concentration, agglomeration and/or coalescence of the trapped particles depending on the type of acoustic standing wave that is utilized. Relatively large solids of one material can thus be separated from smaller particles of a different material, the same material, and/or the host fluid through enhanced gravitational separation.
The multi-dimensional standing wave generates acoustic radiation forces in both the axial direction (i.e., in the direction of the standing wave, between the transducer and the reflector, perpendicular to the flow direction) and the lateral direction (i.e., in the flow direction). As the mixture flows through the acoustic chamber, particles in suspension experience a strong axial force component in the direction of the standing wave. Since this acoustic force is perpendicular to the flow direction and the drag force, it quickly moves the particles to pressure nodal planes or anti-nodal planes, depending on the contrast factor of the particle. The lateral acoustic radiation force then acts to move the concentrated particles towards the center of each planar node, resulting in agglomeration or clumping. The lateral acoustic radiation force component has to overcome fluid drag for such clumps of particles to continually grow. Therefore, both the drop in drag per particle as the particle cluster increases in size, as well as the drop in acoustic radiation force per particle as the particle cluster grows in size, must be considered for the acoustic separator device to work effectively. In the present disclosure, the lateral force component and the axial force component of the multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave are of the same order of magnitude. In this regard, it is noted that in a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave, the axial force is stronger than the lateral force, but the lateral force of a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave is much higher than the lateral force of a planar standing wave, usually by two orders of magnitude or more.
The acoustophoretic devices of the present disclosure are operable to perform acoustics-driven selective lysis with microfluidic separation, thereby concentrating pathogens and holding them for growth. The acoustophoretic devices, such as that depicted in
When the acoustophoretic device is provided with a buffer inlet, a buffer (e.g., a dividing buffer or a selective lytic buffer) can be introduced into the flow chamber through the at least one buffer inlet. The buffer generally creates a buffer layer in the flow chamber that permits the pathogens to pass therethrough but destroys the specimen (e.g., blood cells) as it passes therethrough. This may also be called differential lysis. In
Turning now to
The device 200 includes a flow chamber 210, at least one ultrasonic transducer 220, a transparent wall 250, and an optional acoustically transparent layer 260. A microscope objective 240 is illustrated here, which can be used to characterize the cells within the flow chamber.
The flow chamber 210 is the region of the device 200 through which is flowed a host fluid containing target cells. The flow chamber 210 includes at least one inlet 212 and at least one outlet 214. The at least one inlet 210 may include a solvent inlet, at least one host-fluid inlet, and optionally include at least one buffer inlet as shown and described above with respect to device 100. Likewise, the at least one outlet 214 may include a particulate outlet and at least one residual outlet as shown and described above with respect to device 100.
The ultrasonic transducer 220 of the device 200 is located on wall 222 of the flow chamber 210. The microscope objective 240 of the device 200 is located on the opposite side of the flow chamber 210 from the ultrasonic transducer 220. The optically transparent wall 250 is located between the microscope objective 240 and the flow chamber 210 volume, and forms wall 252 of the flow chamber 210. As seen in
Generally, the microscope objective 240 is used to inspect or monitor the target cells trapped within the flow chamber 210. In certain embodiments, such as that shown in
In accordance with the present disclosure, the acoustophoretic devices described herein, such as that depicted in
In the present devices, to isolate specialized circulating cells, paramagnetic particles or hollow microbubbles can be used. The paramagnetic particles/microbubbles generally pull the specialized circulating cells out of the blood because they move in an opposite direction to the blood cells when subjected to acoustophoresis (due to the negative acoustic contrast factor of the paramagnetic particles/microbubbles, which moves towards pressure antinodes of an acoustic standing wave). In this way, microfluidics with sheathing flows and acoustic standing wave(s) can be used to extract and concentrate specialized circulating cells from blood. This provides a distinct advantage over currently-employed systems and methods, which required incubation with immunomagnetic beads to capture magnetically labeled cells by flotation as they passed through isolation zones of known microfluidic devices.
This is illustrated in
In the presently disclosed acoustophoretic devices, acoustophoresis and acoustically active particles (e.g. microbubbles or paramagnetic particles) can be utilized instead of immunomagnetic beads. For example, device 200 can be operated by flowing blood containing specialized circulating cells and blood cells therethrough and sending a voltage signal to drive the at least one ultrasonic transducer to create the acoustic standing wave in the flow chamber and microbubbles in the blood. Because the device 200 is a one-piece acoustic radiator, the specialized circulating cells with attached microbubbles are driven by the acoustic standing wave toward the acoustically transparent wall where the specialized circulating cells and attached microbubbles become trapped in the acoustic standing wave, such as is depicted in
With reference to
The piezoelectric elements 124 can be individually switched between the active and inactive modes as desired. For example, in
Another operation of the piezoelectric elements 124 is depicted in
In biological applications, many parts of the device in contact with the sample, e.g. the flow chamber, may all be disposable, with only the transducer and reflector to be cleaned for reuse.
Some further explanation of the ultrasonic transducers used in the devices, systems, and methods of the present disclosure may be helpful as well. In this regard, the transducers use a piezoelectric element, usually made of PZT-8 (lead zirconate titanate). Such elements may have a 1 inch cross-section and a nominal 2 MHz resonance frequency, and may also be of a larger size. Each ultrasonic transducer module can have only one element, or can have multiple elements that each act as a separate ultrasonic transducer and are either controlled by one or multiple amplifiers. The piezoelectric element(s) can be crystalline, semi-crystalline, or non-crystalline. The piezoelectric element(s) can be square, rectangular, irregular polygon, or generally of any arbitrary shape. The transducer(s) is/are used to create a pressure field that generates forces of the same order of magnitude both orthogonal to the standing wave direction (lateral) and in the standing wave direction (axial).
Screws 88 attach an aluminum top plate 82a of the housing to the body 82b of the housing via threads. The top plate includes a connector 84 for powering the transducer. The top surface of the PZT crystal 86 is connected to a positive electrode 90 and a negative electrode 92, which are separated by an insulating material 94. The electrodes can be made from any conductive material, such as silver or nickel. Electrical power is provided to the PZT crystal 86 through the electrodes on the crystal. Note that the crystal 86 has no backing layer or epoxy layer. Put another way, there is an air gap 87 in the transducer between aluminum top plate 82a and the crystal 86 (i.e. the air gap is completely empty). A minimal backing 58 and/or wear plate 50 may be provided in some embodiments, as seen in
The transducer design can affect performance of the system. A typical transducer is a layered structure with the piezoelectric element bonded to a backing layer and a wear plate. Because the transducer is loaded with the high mechanical impedance presented by the standing wave, the traditional design guidelines for wear plates, e.g., half wavelength thickness for standing wave applications or quarter wavelength thickness for radiation applications, and manufacturing methods may not be appropriate. Rather, in one embodiment of the present disclosure the transducers, there is no wear plate or backing, allowing the piezoelectric element to vibrate in one of its eigenmodes (i.e. near eigenfrequency) with a high Q-factor. The vibrating piezoelectric element, such as, e.g., a ceramic crystal/disk, is directly exposed to the fluid flowing through the acoustic chamber.
Removing the backing (e.g. making the piezoelectric element air backed) also permits the element to vibrate at higher order modes of vibration with little damping (e.g. higher order modal displacement). In a transducer having a piezoelectric element with a backing, the element vibrates with a more uniform displacement, like a piston. Removing the backing allows the element to vibrate in a non-uniform displacement mode. The higher order the mode shape of the piezoelectric element, the more nodal lines the element has. The higher order modal displacement of the element creates more trapping lines, although the correlation of trapping line to node is not necessarily one to one, and driving the element at a higher frequency will not necessarily produce more trapping lines.
In some embodiments, the piezoelectric element may have a backing that minimally affects the Q-factor of the crystal (e.g. less than 5%). The backing may be made of a substantially acoustically transparent material such as balsa wood, foam, or cork which allows the element to vibrate in a higher order mode shape and maintains a high Q-factor while still providing some mechanical support for the element. The backing layer may be a solid, or may be a lattice having holes through the layer, such that the lattice follows the nodes of the vibrating element in a particular higher order vibration mode, providing support at node locations while allowing the rest of the element to vibrate freely. The goal of the lattice work or acoustically transparent material is to provide support without lowering the Q-factor of the piezoelectric element or interfering with the excitation of a particular mode shape.
Placing the piezoelectric element in direct contact with the fluid also contributes to the high Q-factor by avoiding the dampening and energy absorption effects of the epoxy layer and the wear plate. Other embodiments may have wear plates or a wear surface to prevent the PZT, which contains lead, contacting the host fluid. This may be desirable in, for example, biological applications such as separating blood. Such applications might use a wear layer such as chrome, electrolytic nickel, or electroless nickel. Chemical vapor deposition could also be used to apply a layer of poly(p-xylylene) (e.g. Parylene) or other polymers or polymer films. Organic and biocompatible coatings such as silicone or polyurethane are also usable as a wear surface.
Certain embodiments of the acoustophoretic devices and methods described herein are useful for preparing a sample for subsequent downstream processing. In this regard, the sample may be subsequently processed by any known filtration or processing, such as by using a portable flow cytometer. Other embodiments of the acoustophoretic devices and methods described herein are useful for inspecting, detecting, isolating, or characterizing bacteria or specialized circulating cells in blood containing blood cells. In this regard, the bacteria or specialized circulating cells may be subsequently processed or filtered by any known filtration or processing, such as by collecting the bacteria or specialized circulating cells from the device and feeding the same to another filtration process.
Avoiding centrifuges and physical filters allows better separation of cells without lowering the viability of the cells. The form factor of the acoustophoretic device is also smaller than a physical filtration system, allowing cell separation to be miniaturized. The transducers may also be driven to create rapid pressure changes to prevent or clear blockages due to agglomeration of cells. The frequency of the transducers may also be varied to obtain optimal effectiveness for a given power.
The present disclosure has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the present disclosure be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/174,512, filed on Jun. 11, 2015, the disclosure of which is hereby fully incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2473971 | Ross | Jun 1949 | A |
2667944 | Crites | Feb 1954 | A |
3372370 | Cyr | Mar 1968 | A |
3555311 | Weber | Jan 1971 | A |
4055491 | Porath-Furedi | Oct 1977 | A |
4065875 | Srna | Jan 1978 | A |
4118649 | Schwartzman et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4158629 | Sawyer | Jun 1979 | A |
4165273 | Azarov et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4173725 | Asai et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4204096 | Barcus et al. | May 1980 | A |
4320659 | Lynnworth et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4344448 | Potts | Aug 1982 | A |
4398325 | Piaget et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4666595 | Graham | May 1987 | A |
4673512 | Schram | Jun 1987 | A |
4699588 | Zinn et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4743361 | Schram | May 1988 | A |
4759775 | Peterson et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4800316 | Wang | Jan 1989 | A |
4821838 | Chen | Apr 1989 | A |
4836684 | Javorik et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4878210 | Mitome | Oct 1989 | A |
4983189 | Peterson et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5164094 | Stuckart | Nov 1992 | A |
5225089 | Benes et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5371729 | Manna | Dec 1994 | A |
5395592 | Bolleman et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5431817 | Braatz et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443985 | Lu et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452267 | Spevak | Sep 1995 | A |
5484537 | Whitworth | Jan 1996 | A |
5527460 | Trampler et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5560362 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5594165 | Madanshetty | Jan 1997 | A |
5604301 | Mountford et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5626767 | Trampler et al. | May 1997 | A |
5688405 | Dickinson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5711888 | Trampler et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5831166 | Kozuka et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834871 | Puskas | Nov 1998 | A |
5902489 | Yasuda et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912182 | Coakley et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5951456 | Scott | Sep 1999 | A |
6090295 | Raghavarao et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6166231 | Hoeksema | Dec 2000 | A |
6216538 | Yasuda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6205848 | Faber et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273262 | Yasuda et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6332541 | Coakley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6391653 | Letcher et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6482327 | Mod et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487095 | Malik et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6592821 | Wada et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6649069 | DeAngelis | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6699711 | Hahn et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6763722 | Fjield et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6881314 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6929750 | Laurell et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936151 | Lock et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7008540 | Weavers et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7010979 | Scott | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7061163 | Nagahara et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7081192 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7093482 | Berndt | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7108137 | Lal et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7150779 | Meegan, Jr. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7186502 | Vesey | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191787 | Redeker et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7322431 | Ratcliff | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331233 | Scott | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7340957 | Kaduchak et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7373805 | Hawkes et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7541166 | Belgrader et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7601267 | Haake et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7673516 | Janssen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7837040 | Ward et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846382 | Strand et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7968049 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8080202 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8134705 | Kaduchak et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8256076 | Feller | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8266950 | Kaduchak et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273253 | Curran | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273392 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8309408 | Ward et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8319398 | Vivek et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8334133 | Fedorov et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8387803 | Thorslund et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8592204 | Lipkens et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8679338 | Rietman et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8691145 | Dionne et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8873051 | Kaduchak et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8889388 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020038662 | Schuler et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020134734 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030015035 | Kaduchak et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028108 | Miller et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030195496 | Maguire | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030209500 | Kock et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030230535 | Affeld et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016699 | Bayevsky | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050031499 | Meier | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050121269 | Namduri | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145567 | Quintel et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196725 | Fu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060037915 | Strand | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070272618 | Gou et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284299 | Xu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080067128 | Hoyos et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080105625 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080217259 | Siversson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245709 | Kaduchak et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272034 | Ferren et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080272065 | Johnson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090029870 | Ward et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090045107 | Ward et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090053686 | Ward et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090087492 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098027 | Tabata et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090104594 | Webb | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090178716 | Kaduchak et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194420 | Mariella, Jr. et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090295505 | Mohammadi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000945 | Gavalas | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100078323 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100078384 | Yang | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124142 | Laugharn et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100139377 | Huang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100192693 | Mudge et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100193407 | Steinberg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206818 | Leong et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100255573 | Bond et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100261918 | Chianelli et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100317088 | Radaelli et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323342 | Gonzalez Gomez et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330633 | Walther et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110003350 | Schafran et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110024335 | Ward et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110092726 | Clarke | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110095225 | Eckelberry et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110123392 | Dionne et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125024 | Mueller | May 2011 | A1 |
20110146678 | Ruecroft et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154890 | Holm et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166551 | Schafer | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110189732 | Wienand et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110262990 | Wang et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110278218 | Dionne et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281319 | Swayze et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110309020 | Rietman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120088295 | Yasuda et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120163126 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120175012 | Goodwin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120267288 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120325727 | Dionne et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120325747 | Rietman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328477 | Dionne et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120329122 | Lipkens et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130115664 | Khanna et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130175226 | Coussios et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130217113 | Srinivasan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130277316 | Dutra et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130277317 | LoRicco et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130284271 | Lipkens et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140011240 | Lipkens | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140017758 | Kniep et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140329997 | Kennedy, III | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150053561 | Ward et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
30 27 433 | Feb 1982 | DE |
196 48 519 | Jun 1998 | DE |
10 2008 006 501 | Sep 2008 | DE |
0 292 470 | Nov 1988 | EP |
1 254 669 | Nov 2002 | EP |
2 420 510 | May 2006 | GB |
9-136090 | May 1997 | JP |
WO 198707178 | Dec 1987 | WO |
WO 9005008 | Mar 1990 | WO |
WO 9850133 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 02072234 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2009111276 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009144709 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010024753 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010040394 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2011023949 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011025890 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011027146 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011131947 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2011161463 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 2013043297 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2013055517 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2014014941 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2014055219 | Apr 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alvarez et al.; Shock Waves, vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 441-447, 2008. |
Benes et al.; Ultrasonic Separation of Suspended Particles, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; Oct. 7-10, 2001; pp. 649-659; Atlanta, Georgia. |
Castro; Tunable gap and quantum quench dynamics in bilayer graphene; Jul. 13, 2010; Mathematica Summer School. |
Cravotto et al.; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 898-902, 2008. |
Garcia-Lopez, et al; Enhanced Acoustic Separation of Oil-Water Emulsion in Resonant Cavities. The Open Acoustics Journal. 2008, vol. 1, pp. 66-71. |
Hill et al.; Ultrasonic Particle Manipulation; Microfluidic Technologies for Miniaturized Analysis Systems, Jan. 2007, pp. 359-378. |
Kuznetsova et al.; Microparticle concentration in short path length ultrasonic resonators: Roles of radiation pressure and acoustic streaming; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 116, No. 4, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 1956-1966, DOI: 1.1121/1.1785831. |
Latt et al.; Ultrasound-membrane hybrid processes for enhancement of filtration properties; Ultrasonics sonochemistry 13.4 (2006): 321-328. |
Lipkens et al.; Frequency sweeping and fluid flow effects on particle trajectories in ultrasonic standing waves; Acoustics 08, Paris, Jun. 29-Jul. 4, 2008. |
Lipkens et al.; Prediction and measurement of particle velocities in ultrasonic standing waves; J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 124 No. 4, pp. 2492 (A) 2008. |
Lipkens et al.; Separation of micron-sized particles in macro-scale cavities by ultrasonic standing waves; Presented at the International Congress on Ultrasonics, Santiago; Jan. 11-17, 2009. |
Lipkens et al.; The effect of frequency sweeping and fluid flow on particle trajectories in ultrasonic standing waves; IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 667-677, 2008. |
Lipkens et al., Macro-scale acoustophoretic separation of lipid particles from red blood cells, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 133, Jun. 2, 2013, p. 045017, XP055162509, New York, NY. |
Meribout et a.; An Industrial-Prototype Acoustic Array for Real-Time Emulsion Layer Detection in Oil Storage Tanks; IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 9, No. 12, Dec. 2009. |
Nilsson et al.; Review of cell and particle trapping in microfluidic systems; Department of Measurement Technology and Industrial Electrical Engineering, Div. of Nanobiotechnology, Lund University, P.O. Box 118. Lund, Sweden, Analytica Chimica Acta 649, Jul. 14, 2009, pp. 141-157. |
Pangu et al.; Droplet transport and coalescence kinetics in emulsions subjected to acoustic fields; Ultrasonics 46, pp. 289-302 (2007). |
Ponomarenko et al.; Density of states and zero Landau level probed through capacitance of graphene; Nature Nanotechnology Letters, Jul. 5, 2009; DOI: 10.1038/NNANO.2009.177. |
Seymour et al, J. Chem. Edu., 1990, 67(9), p. 763, published Sep. 1990. |
Wang et al.; Retention and Viability Characteristics of Mammalian Cells in an Acoustically Driven Polymer Mesh; Biotechnol. Prog. 2004, pp. 384-387 (2004). |
Annex to Form PCT/ISA/206—Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search Report, dated Jul. 18, 2013. |
European Search Report of European Application No. 11769474.5, dated Oct. 10, 2012. |
European Search Report of European Application No. 13760840.2, dated Feb. 4, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 20, 2011, for corresponding PCT application No. PCT/US2011/032181. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2012, for PCT application No. PCT/US2011/040787. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2012/051804 dated Nov. 16, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2013/037404 dated Jun. 21, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2013/032705 dated Jul. 26, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2013/050729 dated Sep. 25, 2013. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 18, 2014 in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/059640. |
International Search Report for corresponding PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/015382 dated May 6, 2014. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/035557 dated Aug. 27, 2014. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/043930 dated Oct. 22, 2014. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/046412 dated Oct. 27, 2014. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/064088 dated Jan. 30, 2015. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 12833859.7 dated Mar. 20, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2015/010595 dated Apr. 15, 2015. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/019755 dated May 4, 2015. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 30, 2015 for International Application No. PCT/US2015/030009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2015/039125 dated Sep. 30, 2015. |
European Search Report of European Application No. 11796470.0 dated Jan. 5, 2016. |
Phys. Org. “Engineers develop revolutionary nanotech water desalination membrane.” Nov. 6, 2006. http://phys.org/news82047372.html. |
“Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conference,” Apr. 23-27, 2012, Nantes, France, pp. 278-282. |
Sony New Release: <http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201010/10-137E/index.html>. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/037104 dated Dec. 16, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160363579 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62174512 | Jun 2015 | US |