Acoustic resistor for hearing improvement and audiometric applications, and method of making same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6830876
  • Patent Number
    6,830,876
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 10, 2003
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 14, 2004
    19 years ago
Abstract
An acoustic resistor or damper and method of manufacturing the same is disclosed. The damper has mesh material and mounting material attached to the mesh material. The mounting material defines an open region for transmission of sound through the mesh material, and has a mounting surface for mounting the damper on a surface surrounding an acoustic port or tube. The mounting surface is located on a plane different from the mesh material, thereby shielding the mesh material from adhesive applied between the mounting surface and the surface surrounding the acoustic port or tube. The method of manufacturing an acoustic damper comprises exposing emulsion applied to a mesh material through at least one opening in a photographic mask to ultraviolet light and removing the emulsion exposed. A portion of the remaining emulsion and mesh material is cut in a shape surrounding the removed emulsion.
Description




STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT




N/A




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The use of acoustic resistance in transducers and sound channels is well known. In the case of a sound tube, for example, a resistance equal to its characteristic impedance will completely damp the length resonances, leaving a smooth frequency response. This is recently taught, for example, by the inventor in his chapter describing use of dampers entitled (“Earmold Design: Theory and Practice,” Proceedings of 13th Danavox Symposium, pp. 155-174, 1988). In the case of microphones and receivers, acoustic resistance can be used to smooth resonance peaks and improve the sound quality (as described by Killion and Tillman in their paper “Evaluation of High-Fidelity Hearing Aids,” J. Speech Hearing Res., V. 25, pp. 15-25, 1982). In the case of earplugs, acoustic resistance can be used in cooperation with other acoustic elements to produce high fidelity earplugs such as used by musicians in symphony orchestras (as cited in the following: Carlson, 1989, U.S. Pat. No. 4,807,612; Killion, 1989, U.S. Pat. No. 4,852,683; Killion, Stewart, Falco, and Berger, 1992, U.S. Pat. No. 5,113,967).




One problem, however, with available acoustic resistors, commonly called dampers or damping elements, is their cost. When produced with adequately tight tolerance such as to +/−20% or better, the most popular damping elements (Knowles BF-series plugs, Carlson and Mostardo, 1976, U.S. Pat. No. 3,930,560) cost $0.60 each even in very high quantities. This has been relatively stable over the life of the U.S. Pat. No. 3,930,560 and has been independent of whether the actual damping element is a cloth mesh, perforated metal (typically electroformed), or the like.




Another problem with available acoustic resistors is their design.

FIG. 1

illustrates a typical early prior art acoustic resistor design. Resistor (damper)


100


is comprised of a flat piece of cloth (e.g., silk) punched into a cloth disc


101


. Cloth disc


101


is mounted on a flat surface over an acoustic port or tube


103


. Typically, non-corrosive rubber-like adhesive


105


, for example, is used between a bottom surface of cloth disc


101


and a top surface of the structure that forms port or tube


103


. Portions of the adhesive


105


typically wick into areas of the open region of cloth disc


101


, as shown by reference numerals


107


and


109


.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

illustrate a later prior art acoustic resistor design.

FIG. 2A

is a side view of a damper


200


, which is comprised of a flat piece of metal


203


that has perforated holes


205


in the middle. The perforated holes


205


form the open region of the damper


201


.

FIG. 2B

is another review of the damper of FIG.


2


A. As can be seen, the damper


201


is generally comprised of a perforated center section


207


(i.e., the open region) and a solid outer ring


209


.




Like damper


100


, damper


200


is mounted on a flat surface over an acoustic tube or port (not shown). Adhesive is likewise used between a surface of the solid outer ring


209


and a top surface of the structure that forms the tube or port. Again, portions of the adhesive wick into the perforated center section


207


, partially deforming the open region of the damper


200


.




In both cases, this wicking effect causes a change in the diameter of the open region of the damper, which consequently causes a change in the resistance of the damper. A 2% change in the diameter of the open region of the damper causes an approximately 4% change in the resistance of the damper. Because the diameter of the port or tube of prior art devices was typically large, however, changes in the diameter of the damper as such had at least a tolerable adverse effect on damper performance.




As the port and tube diameters of hearing improvement and audiometric devices become smaller and smaller, however, the adverse effect of adhesive wicking becomes more pronounced. In order to obtain tight tolerances of resistance values as port and tube diameters decrease, it is desirable to more tightly control the open region of the damper by eliminating adhesive wicking. On the other hand, in order to provide inexpensive assembly, adhesive is generally used. The combination of small dampers and the use of adhesive, however, causes highly variable results.




Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional and traditional systems will become apparent to one of skill in the art through comparison of such systems with the present invention set forth in the remainder of the present application with reference to the drawings.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The problems and drawbacks of the prior art are addressed by the damper of the present invention. The damper comprises a mesh material and a mounting material that is attached to the mesh material. The mounting material defines an open region of the mesh material through which sound is transmitted. The mounting material has a mounting surface that is located on a different plane than the mesh material. This configuration enables adhesive to be used between the mounting surface of the damper and a corresponding mounting surface surrounding an acoustic opening, without effecting the resistance of the mesh material in the open region.




The mesh material may be, for example, cloth, metal, polyester, nylon or silk. The mounting material may be emulsion or double-sided tape, for example.




In an emulsion embodiment, the damper may be manufactured by applying a photosensitive emulsion over the mesh material and exposing the emulsion through a photographic mask. The exposed emulsion is washed away, leaving an open region of mesh and a surround of emulsion. The surround of emulsion (and mesh) is then mechanically punched to generate a “doughnut” damper, or any other desired shape, having an open region of mesh defined by surrounding emulsion.




In a double-sided tape embodiment, the damper may be manufactured by applying a sheet of perforated double-sided tape to a mesh material. The double-sided tape surrounding the perforation is then mechanically punched to generate a finished damper product (after removal of the double-sided tape backing), having an open region of mesh defined by surrounding double-sided tape.




Other aspects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

illustrates a typical early prior art acoustic resistor design.





FIGS. 2A and 2B

illustrate a later prior art acoustic resistor design.





FIG. 3A

is a cross-sectional view of an acoustic resistor or damper according to the present invention.





FIG. 3B

is a cross-sectional view of the acoustic resistor or damper mounted on a flat surface and over an acoustic port or tube.





FIG. 4

is a cross-section view of an alternate embodiment of the acoustic resistor or damper of FIG.


3


A.





FIGS. 5A-5C

are top views of various contemplated shapes that the acoustic resistor or damper of the present invention may take to fit a number of different applications.





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of another alternate embodiment of the acoustic resistor or damper of the present invention.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

are cross-sectional views of embodiments of an acoustic resistor or damper assembly of the present invention, for mounting on or within an acoustic port or tube.





FIG. 8

is a side view illustrating an emulsion/mesh combination used in connection with manufacture of one embodiment of the damper of the present invention.





FIG. 9

is a top view of a matrix of nearly finished dampers manufactured according to one embodiment of the method of the present invention.





FIG. 10A

is a top view of an exemplary finished damper product.





FIG. 10B

is a perspective view of an exemplary finished damper product.





FIGS. 11A and 11B

illustrate one embodiment of a “peel, stick and punch” process for making a double-sided tape version of the damper of the present invention.





FIGS. 12A and 12B

illustrate one potential finished product that may be made using the process discussed with respect to

FIGS. 11A and 11B

.





FIGS. 13A and 13B

are top and side cross-sectional views, respectively, of an alternate double-sided tape embodiment.





FIGS. 14A and 14B

are top and side cross-sectional views, respectively, of another alternative double-sided tape embodiment.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIG. 3A

is a cross-sectional view of an acoustic resistor or damper according to the present invention. Damper


300


comprises a mesh material


301


and a mounting material


303


. The mesh material


301


may be, for example, cloth, metal, polyester, nylon, or silk, and may have a thickness chosen to suit the particular application. In one hearing aid application, a thickness of approximately 0.003 inches was found to be acceptable. The mounting material


303


may be, for example, emulsion, double-sided tape, or foam, and may also have a thickness chosen to suit the particular application. In the hearing aid application mentioned above, a thickness of approximately 0.002 inches was found to be acceptable. In another application, a thickness of approximately 0.020 was found acceptable. Mounting material


303


is mounted or attached to mesh material


301


, forming open region


306


of the damper


300


.





FIG. 3B

is a cross-sectional view of the acoustic resistor or damper


303


mounted on a flat surface and over an acoustic port or tube


305


. Adhesive


307


is used between the flat surface and mounting material


303


. Adhesive


307


may, for example, be epoxy.




As can be seen from

FIG. 3B

, the surface of the mounting material


303


that receives the adhesive


307


is on a different plane than mesh material


301


. Thus, the open region


306


of the damper


300


is positioned away from the adhesive


307


. Any wicking of the adhesive


307


occurs in the mounting material


303


, and consequently the open region is not affected. This configuration enables tight tolerances of the resistance values from one specimen to the next.





FIG. 4

is a cross-section view of an alternate embodiment of the acoustic resistor or damper of FIG.


3


A. Acoustic resistor or damper


400


is similar to damper


300


of

FIG. 3A

, except that mounting material


403


of

FIG. 4

is mounted or attached on both sides of mesh material


405


. This enables adhesive to be used on both sides of the damper


400


, if desired for a particular mounting configuration, without affecting the open region


406


of damper


400


.




The acoustic resistors or dampers of

FIGS. 3A and 4

may be formed into any shape, and may have nearly any desired dimensions to enable use with nearly any size or shape acoustic port or tube. For example,

FIGS. 5A-5C

are top views of various contemplated shapes that the acoustic resistor or damper of the present invention may take to fit a number of different applications. More specifically,

FIG. 5A

is a “doughnut” or generally circular shape, which may be used with, for example, generally circular port openings.

FIG. 5B

is a generally rectangular shape, which may be used with, for example, generally rectangular port openings.

FIG. 5C

is a “comer” shape, which may be used in an application in which the acoustic port opening is located on a comer. Of course, any number of other shapes may also be used and are contemplated by the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a cross-sectional view of another alternate embodiment of the acoustic resistor or damper of the present invention. Damper


600


may be, for example, a formed disc made from metal via a photo etching process. Damper


600


comprises an open region


601


and an adhesive portion or surface


603


. The open region


601


may comprise a plurality of perforated holes


605


, for example. Like the embodiments of

FIGS. 3A and 4

discussed above, the mounting surface


603


, as a result of the forming, is located on a different plane than the open region


601


. Consequently, adhesive may be used between the mounting surface


603


and a flat surface surrounding the acoustic port or opening (not shown) without affecting the open region


601


.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

are cross-sectional views of embodiments of an acoustic resistor or damper assembly of the present invention, for mounting on or within an acoustic port or tube. Damper assembly


700


of

FIG. 7A

comprises a body piece


701


and a damper piece


703


. Damper piece


703


may be, for example, that described above with respect to

FIG. 3A

or

FIG. 4

, and body piece


701


may be molded from plastic. Damper piece


703


is mounted on an end surface of body piece


701


, and the assembly


700


is inserted as a unit into an acoustic port or tube (not shown).




Similarly, damper assembly


710


of

FIG. 7B

comprises a body piece


711


and a damper piece


713


. Again damper piece


713


may be, for example, that described above with respect to

FIG. 3A

or

FIG. 4

, and body piece


711


may be molded from plastic. In the embodiment of

FIG. 7B

, however, body piece


711


includes a recess


715


and a mounting surface


717


for receiving and mounting the damper piece


713


within the body piece


711


. Once the damper piece


713


is mounted within the body piece


711


, the damper assembly


710


is inserted as a unit on or into an acoustic port or tube (not shown). The damper piece


713


can be sealed within the body piece


711


by several means. For, example, the sides of body piece


711


defining the recess


715


may be crimped. Alternately, a sealing collar (not shown) can be pressed into the recess


715


and against the damper piece


713


. Otherwise, adhesive can be used.




The damper assembly embodiments of

FIGS. 7A and 7B

may be used as a lower cost replacement for insertion-type prior art dampers, such as, for example, the cup-like acoustic resistor found in U.S. Pat. No. 3,930,560 mentioned above.




As mentioned above with respect to

FIGS. 3A and 4

, the mounting material may be made of a number of different materials, such as double-sided tape or emulsion. In an emulsion embodiment, a thick photosensitive emulsion is applied over the resistance material and then exposed through a photographic mask so as to allow washing out of the emulsion in the desired resistance area (i.e., the “open region” discussed above) leaving a surround of thick emulsion. The desired form or shape (e.g., the “doughnut” shape discussed above) is then punched or cut out to produce the finished damper product.




More specifically, a photographic mask is prepared that defines the inner diameter of the desired opening (i.e., the “open region” discussed above). Any shape or size of the open region may be selected depending on the application (as mentioned above), and the selected shape and size is replicated (typically by a photographic “step and repeat” process). Cloth or mesh material is then obtained having the desired resistance value, and is mounted on a frame (such as a silk screen frame, for example). Emulsion is then applied to the cloth. The emulsion can be applied to the top (or bottom) of the screen only (to obtain the configuration shown in FIG.


3


A), or to both the top and bottom of the screen (to obtain the configuration shown in FIG.


4


).





FIG. 8

is a side view illustrating the resulting emulsion/mesh combination at this stage of the process. Combination


800


comprises emulsion


801


and cloth weave


803


. The cloth weave


803


may have a thickness of approximately 0.0025 to 0.003 inches (dimension A in FIG.


8


), and may be comprised of double twill polyester. The emulsion may have an approximately flat surface


805


(for mounting), and may be approximately 0.005 inches thick (dimension B in FIG.


8


).




Next, the emulsion is exposed through the mask to ultraviolet light, and the exposed emulsion is washed away to define those portions of the emulsion to be removed from the cloth. With appropriate changes to the photographic mask, either a positive or negative resist may be used. In other words, a matrix of nearly finished dampers (inner diameters only) results.

FIG. 9

is a top view illustrating an example of such a matrix for a “doughnut” shape damper. Matrix


900


comprises emulsion


901


and a plurality of cloth areas


903


(i.e., open regions discussed above).




Finally, the damper outer diameter (see reference numeral


905


in

FIG. 8

) is mechanically punched out (or cut out using a laser, for example) to achieve the finished damper product. This is done for each of the open regions shown in the matrix


900


, to produce a plurality of finished damper products.





FIG. 10A

is a top view, and

FIG. 10B

is a perspective view, of an exemplary finished damper product. Damper


1000


comprises an emulsion mounting portion


1001


and an open mesh region


1003


. Damper


1000


may have, for example, an inner diameter (defining the open mesh region


1003


) of approximately 0.044 to 0.054 inches, and an outer diameter of approximately 0.078 inches.




As mentioned above, the dampers shown in

FIGS. 3A and 4

may also have a mounting material comprising double-sided tape.

FIGS. 11A and 11B

illustrate one embodiment of a “peel, stick and punch” process for making a double-sided tape version of the damper of the present invention. First, a sheet of perforated double-sided tape


1101


is applied to a sheet of cloth or metal mesh


1103


. The perforations


1104


in the double-sided tape


1101


define the inner diameter of a plurality of unfinished dampers. Next, a mechanical punch (reference numeral


1105


in

FIG. 11B

) is used to punch through the double-sided tape


1101


and the cloth or metal mesh


1103


, defining the outer diameter and creating the finished product.





FIGS. 12A and 12B

illustrate one potential finished product that may be made using the process discussed above with respect to

FIGS. 11A and 11B

.

FIG. 12A

is a top view and

FIG. 12B

is a side cross-sectional view. Damper


1200


comprises a mounting portion


1201


made of double-sided tape and a screen or mesh portion


1203


made of polyester, for example. The damper


1200


may have an inner diameter of approximately 0.045 inches and an outer diameter of approximately 0.120 inches, for example.




In an alternate embodiment, the finished damper of

FIGS. 12A and 12B

may instead be made by a different process. Specifically non-perforated double-sided tape is applied directly to a sheet of cloth or metal mesh. A laser beam is then used to cut the inner diameter through the double-sided tape (but not the cloth or metal mesh), and the resulting slug is removed. Finally, a mechanical punch (such as shown in

FIG. 11B

) is used to punch through the double-sided tape and the cloth or metal mesh, defining the outer diameter and creating the finished product.





FIGS. 13A and 13B

are top and side cross-sectional views, respectively, of an alternative double-sided tape embodiment. Similarly as discussed above with respect to

FIG. 4

, damper


1300


of

FIGS. 13A and 13B

comprises double-sided tape


1301


attached to both sides of cloth or mesh material


1303


. The processes discussed above with respect to

FIGS. 11A and 11B

, with slight modification, may be used to manufacture the finished product shown in

FIGS. 13A and 13B

. For example, two perforated sheets of double-sided tape may be attached to the mesh or screen (one on each side), before the punch process is undertaken.





FIGS. 14A and 14B

are top and side cross-sectional views, respectively, of another alternative double-sided tape embodiment.

FIGS. 14A and 14B

are similar to

FIGS. 13A and 13B

, except that a sheet of foam is placed on each side of the double-sided tape, and an additional piece of double-sided tape is placed on a surface of one of the foam sheets. Specifically, as can be seen from

FIG. 14B

, damper


1400


comprises a polyester cloth


1401


, double-sided tape


1403


and


1405


on respective sides of the polyester cloth


1401


, foam


1407


and


1409


on respective sides of the double-sided tape


1403


and


1405


, and finally a further piece of double-sided tape


1411


on the other surface of foam


1409


. Again, the processes discussed above respecting the other double-sided tape embodiments may be used, with slight modification, to produce the finished product shown in

FIGS. 14A and 14B

.




The dampers of the present invention permit tight tolerances of the resistance values even when adhesives are used. In addition, the dampers of the present invention can be made in large numbers relatively easily and inexpensively. In fact, Applicant believes that the dampers of the present invention can be manufactured and sold at a price that is orders of magnitude cheaper (e.g., 5 cents) than the prior art (e.g., 60 cents).




Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Thus, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described hereinabove.



Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing an acoustic damper comprising:exposing emulsion applied to mesh material through at least one opening in a photographic mask to ultraviolet light; removing the emulsion exposed; and cutting a portion of the remaining emulsion and mesh material in a shape surrounding the removed emulsion.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating the photographic mask having the at least one opening.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising applying the emulsion to the mesh material.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein removing the emulsion exposed comprises washing away the emulsion exposed.
  • 5. The method claim 1 wherein cuffing a portion of the remaining emulsion and mesh material comprises mechanically punching a shape surrounding the removed emulsion.
  • 6. A method of manufacturing an acoustic damper comprising:preparing a mask; preparing an emulsion on a material; exposing at least a portion of said emulsion to ultraviolet light through said mask, forming exposed emulsion and remaining emulsion; removing at least a portion of said exposed emulsion; and cutting at least a portion of said remaining emulsion and said material in a shape surrounding said removed exposed emulsion.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein preparing said mask comprises selecting at least one of a shape or size of an opening.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein preparing said mask comprises defining an inner diameter of said opening using at least said selected shape and size.
  • 9. The method of claim 6 comprising applying said emulsion to said material.
  • 10. The method of claim 6 wherein preparing said emulsion comprises selecting a material having a desired resistance value.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 wherein said material comprises at least one of a cloth, mesh, metal, polyester, nylon and silk.
  • 12. The method of claim 6 wherein preparing said emulsion comprises mounting said material on a frame.
  • 13. The method of claim 6 wherein cutting at least a portion of said remaining emulsion and said material comprises mechanically punching a shape surrounding said removed exposed emulsion.
  • 14. The method of claim 6 wherein removing at least a portion of said exposed emulsion comprises washing away said exposed emulsion.
  • 15. The method of claim 6 wherein preparing said emulsion comprises a mounting material having at least one mounting surface.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein preparing said emulsion comprises defining an approximately circular open region in said mounting material.
  • 17. The method of claim 15 wherein preparing said emulsion comprises defining an approximately rectangular open region in said mounting material.
  • 18. The method of claim 6 wherein preparing said emulsion comprises applying a sheet of double-sided tape having at least one perforation to at least said material.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional of prior U.S. application Ser. No. 09/767,521 filed Jan. 23, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,666,295 issued Dec. 23, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
953557 Shepart Mar 1910 A
3930560 Carlson et al. Jan 1976 A
4349082 Gastmeier Sep 1982 A
4852683 Killion Aug 1989 A
5511296 Dias et al. Apr 1996 A
6029769 Tichy Feb 2000 A