The present invention relates to an active matrix-type display device for driving display elements.
In recent years, it has become necessary that image display devices have high-resolution and high picture quality, and it is desirable for such image display devices to have low power consumption and be thin, lightweight, and visible from wide angles. With such requirements, display devices (displays) have been developed where thin-film active elements (thin-film transistors, also referred to as TFTs) are formed on a glass substrate, with display elements then being formed on top.
In general, a substrate forming active elements is such that patterning and interconnects formed using metal are provided after forming a semiconductor film of silicon, e.g. amorphous silicon or polysilicon. Due to differences in the electrical characteristics of the active elements, the former requires Integrated Circuits (ICs) for drive use, and the latter is capable of forming circuits for drive use on the substrate. In liquid crystal displays (LCDs) currently widely used, the amorphous silicon type is widespread for larger screens, while the polysilicon type is more common in medium and small screens.
Typically, electroluminescent elements, for example organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), are used in combination with TFTs and utilize a voltage/current control operation so that current is controlled. The current/voltage control operation refers to the operation of applying a signal voltage to a TFT gate terminal so as to control current between two electrodes, one of which is connected to the OLED. As a result, it is possible to adjust the intensity of light emitted from the organic EL element and to control the display to the desired gradation.
However, in this configuration, the intensity of light emitted by the organic EL element is extremely sensitive to the TFT characteristics. In particular, for amorphous silicon TFTs (referred to as a-Si), it is known that comparatively large differences in electrical characteristics occur with time between neighboring pixels due to changes in transistor threshold voltage. This is a major cause of deterioration of the display quality of organic EL displays, in particular, screen uniformity. Uncompensated, this effect can lead to “burned-in” images on the screen. Additionally, changes in the EL element itself, such as forward voltage rise and efficiency loss, can cause image bum-in.
Goh et al. (IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 24, No. 9, pp. 583-585) have proposed a pixel circuit with a precharge cycle before data loading to compensate for this effect. Compared to the standard OLED pixel circuit with a capacitor, a select transistor, a power transistor, and power, data, and select lines, Goh's circuit uses an additional control line and two additional switching transistors. Jung et al. (IMID '05 Digest, pp. 793-796) have proposed a similar circuit with an additional control line, an additional capacitor, and three additional transistors. While such circuits can be used to compensate for changes in the threshold voltage of the driving transistor, they add to the complexity of the display, thereby increasing the cost and the likelihood of defects in the manufactured product. Further, such circuitry generally comprises thin-film transistors (TFTs) and necessarily uses up a portion of the substrate area of the display. For bottom-emitting devices, where the aperture ratio is important, such additional circuitry reduces the aperture ratio, and can even make such bottom-emitting displays unusable. Thus, there exists a need to compensate for changes in the OLED emitter and in the electrical characteristics of the pixel circuitry in an OLED display without reducing the aperture ratio of such a display.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method of compensating for changes in the electrical characteristics of the pixel circuitry in an OLED display.
This object is achieved by a method of compensating for changes in the threshold voltage of the drive transistor of an OLED drive circuit, comprising:
a) providing the drive transistor with a first electrode, a second electrode, and a gate electrode;
b) connecting a first voltage source to the first electrode of the drive transistor, and an OLED device to the second electrode of the drive transistor and to a second voltage source;
c) providing a test voltage to the gate electrode of the drive transistor and connecting to the OLED drive circuit a test circuit that includes an adjustable current mirror that is set to provide a predetermined drive current through the drive transistor and the OLED device and causes the voltage applied to the current mirror to be at a first test level when the drive transistor and the OLED device are not degraded by aging conditions, and storing the first test level;
d) providing a test voltage to the gate electrode of the drive transistor and connecting the test circuit to the OLED device to produce a second test level after the drive transistor and the OLED device have aged, and storing the second test level; and
e) using the first and second test levels to calculate a change in the voltage applied to the gate electrode of the drive transistor to compensate for aging of the drive transistor.
It is an advantage of the present invention that it can compensate for changes in the electrical characteristics of the thin-film transistors of an OLED display. It is a further advantage of this invention that it can so compensate without reducing the aperture ratio of a bottom-emitting OLED display and without increasing the complexity of the within-pixel circuits.
Turning now to
Transistors such as drive transistor 170 of OLED drive circuit 100 have a characteristic threshold voltage (Vth). Vgs, the voltage on gate electrode 165 minus the voltage on source electrode 155, must be greater than the threshold voltage to enable current flow between first and second electrodes 145 and 155, respectively. For amorphous silicon transistors, the threshold voltage is known to change under aging conditions, which include placing drive transistor 170 under actual usage conditions, thereby leading to an increase in the threshold voltage. Therefore, a constant signal on gate electrode 165 will cause a gradually decreasing light intensity emitted by OLED device 160. The amount of such decrease will depend upon the use of drive transistor 170; thus, the decrease can be different for different drive transistors in a display. It is desirable to compensate for such changes in the threshold voltage to maintain consistent brightness and color balance of the display, and to prevent image “burn-in” wherein an often-displayed image (e.g. a network logo) can cause a ghost of itself to always show on the active display. Also, there can be age-related changes to OLED device 160, e.g. efficiency loss.
Turning now to
In the most basic case, test circuit 200 measures a single drive transistor 170 of OLED drive circuit 100. To use test circuit 200, one first sets switch 185 to connect test circuit 200 to OLED drive circuit 100. Next, adjustable current mirror 210 is set to provide the predetermined drive current Imir, which is a characteristic current for OLED device 160. Imir is selected to be less than the maximum current possible through drive transistor 170 and OLED device 160; a typical value for Imir will be in the range of 1 to 5 microamps and will generally be constant for all measurements during the lifetime of the OLED device. A test voltage data value Vtest is provided to gate electrode 165 of drive transistor 170 sufficient to provide a current through drive transistor 170 greater than the selected value for Imir. Thus, the limiting value of current through drive transistor 170 and OLED device 160 will be controlled entirely by adjustable current mirror 210, and the current through adjustable current mirror 210 (Imir) will be the same as through drive transistor 170 (Ids) and OLED device 160 (IOLED) (Imir=Ids=IOLED, neglecting leakage). The selected value of Vtest is generally constant for all measurements during the lifetime of the display, and therefore must be sufficient to provide a drive-transistor current greater than Imir even after aging expected during the lifetime of the display. The value of Vtest can be selected based upon known or determined current-voltage and aging characteristics of drive transistor 170. CVcal is set to allow sufficient voltage adjustment of the current mirror voltage, Vmir, to maintain Imir when the threshold voltage (Vth) of drive transistor 170 changes. This value of CVcal will be used for all measurements during the lifetime of the display. The voltages of the components in the circuit can be related by:
Vtest=CVcal+Vmir+VOLED+Vgs (Eq. 1)
which can be rewritten as:
Vmir=Vtest−(CVcal+VOLED+Vgs) (Eq. 2)
Under the conditions described above, Vtest and CVcal are set values. Vgs will be controlled by the value of Imir and the current-voltage characteristics of drive transistor 170, and will change with age-related changes in the threshold voltage of drive transistor 170. VOLED will be controlled by the value of Imir and the current-voltage characteristics of OLED device 160. VOLED can change with age-related changes in OLED device 160.
The values of these voltages will cause the voltage applied to current mirror 210 (Vmir) to adjust to fulfill Eq. 2. This can be measured by measurement apparatus 260 and will be called the test level. To determine the change in the threshold voltage of drive transistor 170 (and the change in VOLED, if any), two tests are performed. The first test is performed when drive transistor 170 and OLED device 160 are not degraded by aging, e.g. before OLED drive circuit 100 is used for display purposes, to cause the voltage Vmir applied current mirror 210 to be at a first test level. The first test level is measured and stored. After drive transistor 170 and OLED device 160 have aged, e.g. by displaying images for a predetermined time, the measurement is repeated with the same Vtest and CVcal. Changes to the threshold voltage of drive transistor 170 will cause a change to Vgs to maintain Imir, while changes in OLED device 160 can cause changes to VOLED. These changes will be reflected in changes to Vmir in Eq. 2, so as to produce voltage Vmir at a second test level. The second test level can be measured and stored. The first and second test levels can be used to calculate a change in the voltage applied to current mirror 210, which is related to the changes in the drive transistor and the OLED device as follows:
ΔVmir=−(ΔVOLED+ΔVgs) (Eq. 3)
Thus, to compensate for changes due to aging of drive transistor 170 and OLED device 160, a change (ΔVg) in the voltage Vg to be applied to gate electrode 165 of drive transistor 170 can be calculated as:
ΔVg=−ΔVmir=ΔVOLED+ΔVgs (Eq. 4)
In more realistic cases, OLED drive circuit 100 is one pixel of a much larger OLED display comprising an array of pixels with a plurality of OLED drive circuits. Each OLED drive circuit includes a drive transistor and an OLED device as described above. Test circuit 200 can measure a single drive transistor 170. This can be accomplished by putting a test voltage (Vtest) on gate electrode 165 of a single drive transistor 170, and setting the gate voltages (Vg) for all other drive transistors in a display to zero, thus putting them in the off state. Ideally, current would then flow only through drive transistor 170 and corresponding OLED device 160, and thus the current through adjustable current mirror 210 (Imir) would be the same as through drive transistor 170 (Ids) and OLED device 160 (IOLED), as above. In reality, the drive circuits that are in the off state have a slight current leakage, which can be significant due to the large number of drive circuits in the off state. The leakage current is shown as off-pixel current 175 (Ioff, also known as dark current) in
Imir=IOLED+Ioff (Eq. 5)
To use test circuit 200 with a plurality of OLED drive circuits, one first sets switch 185 to connect test circuit 200 to the display, including OLED drive circuit 100. CVcal is set such that a negative Vgs will be applied to all the drive circuits that are off to reduce the amount of off-pixel current 175. Thus, if Vg for the drive circuits in the off condition is zero volts, CVcal is set to be greater than or equal to zero volts. This value for CVcal will be used for all measurements during the lifetime of the display. Before any individual OLED drive circuit measurements are done, all drive circuits are programmed to the off condition, e.g. Vg is set to zero for all drive circuits, to provide the off-pixel current off for the display. Adjustable current mirror 210 is programmed to the off-pixel current at a selected mirror voltage Vmir. Vmir for the off-pixel current is selected to allow sufficient adjustment in the voltage over the life of OLED drive circuit 100. Typically, Vmir for the off-pixel current will be selected in the range of 1 to 6 volts, and this value will be used for all measurements during the lifetime of the display. Next, adjustable current mirror 210 is incremented to allow passage of an additional characteristic current IOLED for a single pixel, e.g. OLED device 160. IOLED is selected as described above; a typical value for IOLED will be in the range of 1 to 5 microamps and will generally be constant for all measurements during the lifetime of the display. A data value Vtest is written to gate electrode 165 sufficient to provide a current through drive transistor 170 greater than the selected value for IOLED. Thus, the limiting value of current through drive transistor 170 and corresponding OLED device 160 will be controlled entirely by adjustable current mirror 210. The value of Vtest is selected as described above and is generally constant for all measurements during the lifetime of the display. The gate electrodes of all other OLED drive circuits in the display remain at the off value (e.g. zero volts). Eq. 2 can relate the voltages of the components in OLED drive circuit 100.
Under these conditions, Vtest and CVcal are set values. Vgs will be controlled by the value of IOLED and the current-voltage characteristics of drive transistor 170, and will change with age-related changes in the threshold voltage of drive transistor 170. VOLED will be controlled by the value of IOLED and the current-voltage characteristics of OLED device 160. VOLED can change with age-related changes in OLED device 160. The voltage through current mirror 210, Vmir, will self-adjust to fulfill Eq. 2, above, to be at the test level, which can be measured by measurement apparatus 260. To determine the change in the threshold voltage of drive transistor 170 (and the change in VOLED, if any), two tests are performed as described above: a first test when drive transistor 170 and OLED device 160 are not degraded by aging to produce a first test level, and a second after drive transistor 170 and OLED device 160 have aged to produce a second test level. The first and second test levels can be used to calculate a change in the voltage applied to current mirror 210, which is related to the changes in the drive transistor and the corresponding OLED device as shown above in Eq. 3. Thus, to compensate for changes due to aging of drive transistor 170 and corresponding OLED device 160, a change (ΔVg) in the voltage Vg to be applied to gate electrode 165 of drive transistor 170 can be calculated as shown above in Eq. 4. This can be repeated individually for each drive circuit in the display.
In another embodiment of this method, the test levels can be obtained for a group of drive circuits, e.g. a complete row or column of drive circuits. This would provide an average test level and an average ΔVg for each group of drive circuits, but would have the advantage of requiring less time and storage memory for the method.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Vtest=CVcal+Vmir+Vgs (Eq. 6)
which can be rewritten as:
Vmir=Vtest−(CVcal+Vgs) (Eq. 7)
The change in voltage at current mirror 210 will then be related as follows:
ΔVmir=−ΔVgs (Eq. 8)
and the change in the voltage to be applied to gate electrode 165 will be:
ΔVg=−ΔVmir=ΔVgs (Eq. 9)
Turning back to
In this embodiment, first electrode 145 can be the source and second electrode 155 can be the drain of a p-channel drive transistor 170, which can be an amorphous silicon transistor. The test circuit is employed as described above.
Vtest can be selected to bias the drive transistor such that it is operated in the linear regime. In this regime, Vds, the difference between the voltage Vd at second electrode 155 and the voltage Vs at first electrode 145, can be independent of Vgs and depend only on Ids, which is controlled by current mirror 210.
The selected value of Vtest is generally constant for all measurements during the lifetime of the display, and therefore must be sufficient to provide a drive-transistor current greater than Imir even after aging expected during the lifetime of the display. The value of Vtest can be selected based upon known or determined current-voltage and aging characteristics of drive transistor 170. CVcal is set as described above.
The voltages of the components in the circuit can be related:
PVDD−CVcal=Vmir+VOLED+Vds (Eq. 10)
which can be rewritten as:
Vmir=PVDD−(CVcal+VOLED+Vds) (Eq. 1)
Note that Vtest does not appear in the equation. Any value of Vtest which biases the drive transistor to operate in the linear regime can be used. Under the conditions described above, PVDD and CVcal are set values. Vds will be controlled by the value of Imir and the current-voltage characteristics of drive transistor 170, and may change as drive transistor 170 ages. VOLED will be controlled by the value of Imir and the current-voltage characteristics of OLED device 160. VOLED can change with age-related changes in OLED device 160.
The values of these voltages will cause the voltage applied to current mirror 210 (Vmir) to adjust to fulfill Eq. 11. This can be measured by measurement apparatus 260 and will be called the test level. To determine the change in VOLED and Vds, two tests are performed as described above. Thus, to compensate for changes due to aging of the OLED device 160 and drive transistor 170, a change (ΔVg) in the voltage Vg to be applied to gate electrode 165 of drive transistor 170 can be calculated as described above.
Referring to
Ids=kp[(Vgs−Vth)Vds−Vds2/2] (Eq. 12)
(Kano, Kanaan. Semiconductor Devices. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1998, p. 397, Eq. 13.18). Further, the voltage loop equation for this configuration is:
PVDD,cal−CV=Vmir+VOLED+Vds (Eq. 13)
wherein PVDD,cal is the voltage supplied to the programmable current mirror and CV is a constant rather than an adjustable voltage. When Vgs is sufficiently large to make the Vds2/2 term negligible, and when Vth is constant, as it would be for a drive transistor fabricated e.g. in LTPS, equations 12 and 13 can be combined to yield
Where kp is a constant given in Kano, op cit., Eq. 13.17. In this configuration, PVDD,cal, CV, Ids and Vtest are selected values, Vth is constant, and Vmir is the measured value. Consequently, this configuration can be used to calculate change in the OLED device voltage Voled by measuring Vmir and applying Eq. 14.
A useful simplification of Eq. 12 can be
Ids=kpVds (Eq. 15)
when the effect of gate voltage is fairly small, and when the effect of the squared term is fairly small, as described above. In this case, with the conditions given above for deriving Eq. 14, Voled can be expressed as
Voled=PVDD,cal−CV−Vmir−Ids/kp (Eq. 16)
This simplification is easy to calculate and can be widely applicable.
This approach can be particularly useful on an OLED display comprising a plurality of OLED drive circuits. In this case, the display can comprise multiple groups of drive circuits. A test circuit can be provided for each group. For example, in the case of
In one embodiment, changes in an OLED drive circuit in an OLED display having two or more groups of drive circuits can be compensated. Changes in either the drive transistor or the OLED device of each drive circuit can be compensated. Each drive circuit is as described above, e.g. as shown in
In this embodiment, each test circuit can be connected to the OLED drive circuits in the corresponding group. The test procedure can be as for the single-pixel case, e.g. as described above in reference to
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the above embodiments are constructed wherein the drive transistors and switch transistors are n-type transistors. It will be understood by those skilled in the art, that embodiments wherein the drive transistors and switch transistors are p-type transistors, with appropriate well-known modifications to the circuits, can also be useful in this invention. It will also be understood by those skilled in the art, that this invention can also be employed in embodiments using other well-known 2T1C pixel circuits, such as embodiments in which the capacitor 190 is connected between Vg and a voltage supply other than that shown on the drawings.
This is a continuation-in-part of commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/563,864, filed Nov. 28, 2006, now abandoned entitled “Active Matrix Display Compensation Method” by Charles I. Levey.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6501230 | Feldman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6911781 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7046220 | Tagawa et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7224332 | Cok | May 2007 | B2 |
7233302 | Ishizuka | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7319444 | Jo | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7345660 | Mizukoshi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7479955 | Yoshida | Jan 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 480 195 | Nov 2004 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080122760 A1 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11563864 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 11869834 | US |