Dietrich , F.S., VAC8 protein-yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Genbank Accession No.: S50446, Feb. 24, 1995.* |
Raulf, F., Protein-tyrosine kinase (EC 2.7.1.112)1-freshwater sponge (Spongilla lacustris), Genbank Accession No.: S24550, May 7, 1993.* |
Abe et al., “Molecular Characterization of a Novel Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor mGluR5 Coupled to Inositol Pohosphate/Ca2+ Signal,” J. Biol. Chem. 267(19):13361-13368 (1992). |
Batzer et al., “Hierarchy of binding sites for Grb2 and Shc on the epidermal growth factor receptor,” Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:5192-5201 (1994). |
Bellus et al., “A recurrent mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 causes hypochondroplasia,” Nature Genetics 10:357-359 (1995). |
Blaikie et al., “A Region in Shc Distinct from the SH2 Domain Can Bind Tyrosine-phosphorylated Growth Factor Receptors,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry 269(51):32031-32034 (1994). |
Clark et al., “C. elegans cell-signalling gene sem-5 encodes a protein with SH2 and SH3 domains,” Nature 356:340-344 (1992). |
Curto et al., “Novel Recruitment of Shc, Grb2, and Sos by Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-1 in v-Src-Transformed Cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 243:555-560 (1998). |
Deng et al., “Murine FGFR-1 is required for early postimplantation growth and axial organization,” Genes & Dev. 8:3045-3057 (1994). |
DeVore et al., “An FGF receptor signaling pathway is required for the normal cell migrations of the sex myoblasts in C. elegans hermaphrodites,” Cell 83:611-620 (1995). |
Dikic et al., “Shc Binding to Nerve Growth Factor Receptor is Mediated by the Phosphotyrosine Interaction Domain,” J. Biol. Chem. 270:15125-15129 (1995). |
Gustafson et al., “Phosphotyrosine-dependent interaction of SHC and insulin receptor substrate 1 with the NPEY motif of the insulin receptor via a novel non-SH2 domain,” Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2500-2508 (1995). |
Honegger et al., “Point Mutation at the ATP Binding Site of EGF Receptor Abolishes Protein-Tyrosine Kinase Activity and Alters Cellular Routing,” Cell 51:199-209 (1987). |
Jabs et al., “Jackson-Weiss and Crouzon syndromes are allelic with mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2,” Nature Genetics 8:275-279 (1994). |
Klint et al., “Shc and a novel 89-kDa component couple to the Grb-2 Sos complex in fibroblast growth factor-2-stimulated cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 270(40):23337-23344 (1996). |
Lowenstein et al., “The SH2 and SH3 Domain-Containing Protein GRB2 Links Receptor Tyrosine Kinases to ras Signaling,” Cell 70:431-442 (1992). |
Mohammadi et al., “Point mutation in FGF receptor eliminates phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis without affecting mitogenesis,” Nature 358:681-684 (1992). |
Muenke et al., “A common mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome,” Nature Genetics 8:269-274 (1994). |
Nelson, “Detection of Acridinium Esters by Chemiluminescence,” Nonisotopic DNA Probe Techniques, ed. Larry J. Kricka, (San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.) pp. 275-310 (1992). |
Pawson and Schlessinger, “SH2 and SH3 domains,” Current Biology 3(7):434-442 (1993). |
Resh, “Myristylation and palmitylation of Src family members: The fats of the matter,” Cell 76:411-413 (1994). |
Rozakis-Adcock et al., “Association of the Shc and Grb2/Sem5 SH2-containing proteins is implicated in activation of the Ras pathway by tyrosine kinases,” Nature 360:689-692 (1992). |
Rutland et al., “Identical mutations in the FGFR2 gene cause both Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndrome phenotypes,” Nature Genetics 9:173-176 (1995). |
Sambrook and Maniatis., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1989) (Table of Contents). |
Schlessinger, “SH2/SH3 signaling proteins,” Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev. 4:25-30 (1994). |
Schelssinger et al., “Growth factor signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases,” Neuron 9:383-391 (1992). |
Shiang et al., “Mutations in the transmembrane domain of FGFR3 cause the most common genetic form of dwarfism, achondroplasia,” Cell 78:335-342 (1994). |
Skolnik et al., “The function of GRB2 in linking the insulin receptor to Ras signaling pathways,” Science 260:1953-1955 (1993). |
Spivak-Kroizman et al., “Point mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor eliminates phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis without affecting neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells,” J. Biol. Chem. 269:14419-14423 (1994). |
Sun et al., “Structure of the insulin receptor substrate IRS-1 defines a unique signal transduction protein,” Nature 352:73-77 (1991). |
Tavormina et al., “Another mutation that results in the substitution of an unpaired cysteine residue in the extracellular domain of FGFR3 in thanatophoric dysplasia type I,” Hum. Mol. Genetics 4:2175-2177 (1995). |
Vojtek et al., “Mammalian Ras Interacts Directly with the Serine/Threonine Kinase Raf,” Cell 74:205-214 (1993). |
Wang et al., “Broadly expressed SNT-like proteins link FGF receptor stimulation to activators of Ras,” Oncogene 13:721-729 (1996). |
Webster et al., “Constitutive activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 by the transmembrane domain point mutation found in achondroplasia,” EMBO 15:520-527 (1996). |
White et al., “Mutation of the insulin receptor at tyrosine 960 inhibits signal transmission but does not affect its tyrosine kinase activity,” Cell 54:641-649 (1988). |
Yamaguchi et al., “fgfr-1 is required for embryonic growth and mesodermal patterning during mouse gastrulation,” Genes & Dev. 8:3032-3044 (1994). |