The present invention relates generally to rectifiers, and more particularly relates to rectifiers using a Field Effect structure.
A rectifier is a two terminal device that is commonly used in electric circuits to conduct current in one direction and block current in the opposite direction. The main element of a rectifier is a potential barrier that controls current carrier flow depending on the sign of the potential applied to the external electrodes. Until recently only two major technologies were used to make rectifiers. In Schottky Barrier Diodes (SBD's), the potential barrier is created at the interface between a metal and a semiconductor. Such a barrier is defined by the difference between the work functions of the metal and the semiconductor that make the contact. SBD's provide very good low forward voltage drop (up to 0.4V), which is the major performance characteristic of a diode, but are known to have reliability problems. Due to the lack of carrier modulation they cannot withstand high forward current surges. Additional reliability problem arise due to the spiking during metallization process, which reduces the breakdown voltage and reduces overall yield. Even with the trench Schottky technology, which allows obtain higher breakdown voltage, practical SBD's are limited to breakdown voltages below 250V. The PN-junction technology is typically used for higher voltages. They provide usually higher VF (above 0.7V) and thus lower efficiency, but higher reliability. However, due to carrier density modulation they can withstand large current surges. Also since the maximum electric field is at the PN junction and not at the surface as in a SBD, the metallization spikes do not cause the early breakdown problem.
Other approaches, based on the field effect under an MOS gate, have been proposed in order to combine the high efficiency of a SBD with the high reliability of PN junction diodes. For example, in Pseudo-Schottky Barrier diodes and super barrier rectifiers, the potential barrier is created in the bulk of the semiconductor under the gate via processing (e.g. implantation, diffusion, oxidation etc.). The channel under the MOS gate is only weakly inverted and can be viewed as a barrier for majority carriers. The height of this barrier can be controlled by the gate thickness and the doping concentration under the gate. The presence of the barrier results in rectifying behavior similar to the SBD. SBD's can have a fixed barrier height, corresponding to the metals that make good contact with silicon, while in other prior art devices, the barrier height can be continuously changed. Short channel length and good control of the doping in the channel region are essential to making practical devices. The low voltage (breakdown below 100V) super barrier rectifiers have been shown to combine high reliability (similar to PN-junction diodes) and high efficiency.
However, many high voltage versions of such prior art devices (rated above 150V) exhibit negative differential resistance. Any negative resistance region can be useful to make oscillators, but in rectifiers this is undesirable behavior and needs to be avoided. Thus these prior art devices suffer from significant limitations at high voltages.
To overcome the inability of the prior art to operate reliably at high voltages, it is important to control the negative resistance region, which can involve either an increase or a decrease, depending upon other factors. The source of the negative resistance is the rapid reduction of the drift region resistivity due to the injected carriers. As shown in
where A2 is the total area of the drain region and A1 is smaller since current cannot flow through the P region. W1 is close to the thickness of the P region and W2 is the distance between the P region and substrate. The required breakdown voltage sets the donor concentration in the bottom epitaxial region (ND2), but the donor concentration in the top region (ND1) can be adjusted.
One of the ways to control negative resistance in Field Effect Rectifiers is to adjust the donor concentration in the top layer, which was analyzed in Rodov V., Ankoudinov A. L., Ghosh P., Solid State Electronics 2007; 51:714-718. There a reduction of ND1 twice, by the use of a double layer epitaxial structure, was enough to remove negative resistance from the I-V curve. However, this solution of the negative resistance problem may be not the best practical approach, since it is more difficult to manufacture double layer epitaxial structures.
Another major concern is how fast the diode can be switched from forward current conduction to reverse current blocking. One of the major concerns in reverse recovery is the storage time which depends at least in part on how much charge is present in the barrier region. It takes some time to remove this charge, before the depletion layer can be developed to support reverse voltage. The total stored charge still largely determines the total reverse recovery, however some reasonable amount of storage charge is useful since it can provide soft recovery and reduce electro-magnetic interference problems. Thus the softness of reverse recovery is affected by the total stored charge and junction capacitance. To optimize diode reverse recovery it is helpful to be able to quickly deplete the channel region and to be able to trade off between speed of reverse recovery and electromagnetic emissions.
A brief overview of the prior art leads to following conclusions:
Field Effect Diodes provide a good combination of performance and reliability which cannot be achieved by conventional Schottky or PN-junction technologies.
To avoid negative resistance, prior art Field Effect Diodes typically need special means to adjust the top layer resistance.
The ability to rapidly deplete the channel region and operate at high frequency without large electromagnetic interference is desirable in at least some embodiments.
The present invention comprises an Adjustable Field Effect Rectifier (sometimes “AFER” hereinafter) device having an adjustment pocket or region which permits the device to function reliably and efficiently at high voltages without the negative resistance of prior art devices, while also permitting fast recovery and operation at high frequency without large electromagnetic interference. The process for fabricating a device according to the invention comprises opening the gate oxide followed by ion implantation to create a dopant concentration below that opening. The opening can be covered by oxide, if contact between the doped region and the metal is not desired.
The introduction of the adjustment pocket of the present invention gives a much more flexible device design because it allows modification of the top layer resistance during processing. In some embodiments, it is desirable to increase the top layer resistance, which can be accomplished by a P+ implantation into the pocket. Alternatively, an N+ implantation is used to decrease the top layer resistance. For high voltage devices, the P+ implant is useful to remove negative resistance and thus correct Field Effect rectifier performance. The N+ implant is useful to improve the performance of low voltage diodes. Additional advantages of the adjustment pocket structure are to allow the reduction of the junction capacitance and of the charge stored in the channel area, thus improving the reverse recovery characteristics of the diode.
The present invention can be better understood from the following Detailed Description of the Invention, taken in combination with the appended Figures, as described below.
Referring first to
The adjustment pocket 210 comprises an opening 225 in the gate 205, into which a dopant is implanted. In some embodiments, the adjustment pocket can also comprise an oxide over the opening 220 to assist in ensuring that no significant current can pass through adjustment area. In at least some embodiments, it is desirable to have substantially identical resistors from both sides of the gate opening, to prevent one side from becoming less active during operation. Such an imbalance can cause deterioration in device performance. To facilitate creating substantially equal resistance on both sides of the gate, a self-aligning processing is used in an embodiment
The small N+ contact 230 provide the ohmic contact to the metal for electrons flow. In some embodiments, the N+ contact can be avoided if the Schottky barrier height at the contact is smaller than the barrier height under the gate. In such an embodiment the rectifying behavior is determined by the channel barrier and not the Schottky barrier height. The N++ substrate 235 provides ohmic contact on the backside of the structure and provides as many electrons as holes generated by the P-well 240, thereby maintaining quasineutrality.
In a simplified view, the AFER structure of the present invention resembles the structure of a MOSFET, with the gate shorted to the source. Thus a MOSFET's electric circuit symbol can be modified to represent the AFER device, as shown in
Referring next to
During reverse bias, and because of the connection 445 shown between the source, gate and pocket area, the depletion layers 430A and 440A around the P-well 430 and P-pocket 440 grow in size and eventually start to overlap as shown at dotted dashed curve 450 on
In at least several embodiments, the adjustment pocket provides several important improvements to device performance during the switching between forward and reverse bias. Since part of the gate is removed, junction capacitance is automatically reduced. This also means that fewer carriers will be accumulated under the gate when the device is forward biased. This further reduces the storage time that has to elapse before the depletion layer starts to develop during reverse recovery. Thus, in an embodiment, the traditional methods for controlling carrier lifetime (e.g. electron irradiation), together with the adjustment pocket, allows optimization for reverse recovery, which in turn permits operation at maximum frequency with minimum electromagnetic interference.
As illustrated in
Low voltage devices, with a breakdown voltage below 100 volts, typically do not have the negative resistance problem. To optimize these structures, it is desirable to minimize the forward voltage of the device while keeping leakage at acceptable level. In some embodiments, the adjustment region also helps such optimization by including an N+ pocket implant to reduce the resistance modeled as resistor R1 in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the AFER structure described above provides improvements in reverse recovery as well as controlling the value of the top resistance R1. As discussed above, an increased value of R1 is useful for high voltage devices to solve the negative resistance problem, while a reduced value of R1 can be used to improve efficiency of the low voltage devices.
Referring next to
Referring particularly to
Referring next to
Referring next to
Referring next to
Referring next to
Referring to
However, in some embodiments, it is desirable to further develop the adjustment pocket by adding oxide sidewalls or a layer of oxide. This is shown beginning with
Next, as shown in
Having fully described an embodiment of the invention, together with numerous alternatives and equivalents, those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous alternatives and equivalents exist which do not depart from the invention and are intended to be included within its scope. As a result, the invention is not to be limited by the foregoing description.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/975,467, filed Sep. 26, 2007, having the same title as the present application, provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/022,968, filed Jan. 23, 2008, entitled “Regenerative Building Block and Diode Bridge Rectifier,” and provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/048,336, filed Apr. 28, 2008, entitled “MOSFET with Integrated Field Effect Rectifier,” all of which have the same inventors as the present application and are incorporated herein by reference in full for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3602777 | Berman | Aug 1971 | A |
3603811 | Day et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
4281448 | Barry et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4373252 | Caldwell | Feb 1983 | A |
4599576 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4610730 | Harrington et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4630084 | Tihanyi | Dec 1986 | A |
4722856 | Albrecht et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4783348 | Albrecht et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4903189 | Ngo et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4962411 | Tokura et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967243 | Baliga et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4969028 | Baliga | Nov 1990 | A |
4982260 | Chang et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4996581 | Hamasaki | Feb 1991 | A |
5019530 | Kleinsasser et al. | May 1991 | A |
5021861 | Baliga | Jun 1991 | A |
5070377 | Harada | Dec 1991 | A |
5111253 | Korman et al. | May 1992 | A |
5304831 | Yilmaz et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5381025 | Zommer | Jan 1995 | A |
5387805 | Metzler et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396085 | Baliga | Mar 1995 | A |
5416354 | Blackstone | May 1995 | A |
5430315 | Rumennik | Jul 1995 | A |
5446295 | Whitney | Aug 1995 | A |
5532502 | Seki | Jul 1996 | A |
5545573 | Narazaki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554880 | Metzler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559355 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5621234 | Kato | Apr 1997 | A |
5629536 | Heminger et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643809 | Lien | Jul 1997 | A |
5719411 | Ajit | Feb 1998 | A |
5744994 | Williams | Apr 1998 | A |
5747841 | Ludikhuize | May 1998 | A |
5751025 | Heminger et al. | May 1998 | A |
5818084 | Williams et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825079 | Metzler et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5869380 | Chang | Feb 1999 | A |
5877515 | Ajit | Mar 1999 | A |
5886383 | Kinzer | Mar 1999 | A |
5898982 | Metzler et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929690 | Williams | Jul 1999 | A |
5932922 | Metzler et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956582 | Ayela et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6034385 | Stephani et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051850 | Park | Apr 2000 | A |
6097046 | Plumton | Aug 2000 | A |
6100145 | Kepler et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6169300 | Fragapane | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172398 | Hshieh | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186408 | Rodov et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225280 | Dokter et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235601 | Kim | May 2001 | B1 |
6258634 | Wang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6313001 | Johansson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323091 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331455 | Rodov et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6362036 | Chiozzi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373097 | Werner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384456 | Tihanyi | May 2002 | B1 |
6399996 | Chang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404033 | Chang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6420225 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426541 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6448160 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476442 | Williams et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498367 | Chang et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515330 | Hurtz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537860 | Akiyama et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6624030 | Chang et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6724039 | Blanchard | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743703 | Rodov et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765264 | Chang et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6784489 | Menegoli | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6828605 | Eisele et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6853036 | Rodov et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6956266 | Voldman et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6967374 | Saito et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6979861 | Rodov et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6992353 | Wu | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7009253 | Rodov et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7095113 | Xiaochun et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7250668 | Chang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264999 | Xiaochun et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7342389 | Wu et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
RE40222 | Fragapane | Apr 2008 | E |
20020019115 | Rodov et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030207538 | Hshieh et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050116313 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050189626 | Xiaochun et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050189658 | Xiaochun et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200384 | Nadd et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060097323 | Rodov et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070235752 | Rodov et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246794 | Chang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090026492 | Chatty et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0322400 | Jun 1989 | EP |
05082534 | Apr 1993 | JP |
05175206 | Jul 1993 | JP |
06061250 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06112149 | Apr 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090078962 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60975467 | Sep 2007 | US | |
61022968 | Jan 2008 | US | |
61048336 | Apr 2008 | US |