Patent Grant
10481780
This patent specification relates to systems and methods for the monitoring and control of energy-consuming systems or other resource-consuming systems. More particularly, this patent specification relates to control units that govern the operation of energy-consuming systems, household devices, or other resource-consuming systems, including methods for activating electronic displays for thermostats that govern the operation of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.
Substantial effort and attention continue toward the development of newer and more sustainable energy supplies. The conservation of energy by increased energy efficiency remains crucial to the world's energy future. According to an October 2010 report from the U.S. Department of Energy, heating and cooling account for 56% of the energy use in a typical U.S. home, making it the largest energy expense for most homes. Along with improvements in the physical plant associated with home heating and cooling (e.g., improved insulation, higher efficiency furnaces), substantial increases in energy efficiency can be achieved by better control and regulation of home heating and cooling equipment.
As discussed in the technical publication No. 50-8433, entitled “Power Stealing Thermostats” from Honeywell (1997), early thermostats used a bimetallic strip to sense temperature and respond to temperature changes in the room. The movement of the bimetallic strip was used to directly open and close an electrical circuit. Power was delivered to an electromechanical actuator, usually relay or contactor in the HVAC equipment whenever the contact was closed to provide heating and/or cooling to the controlled space. Since these thermostats did not require electrical power to operate, the wiring connections were very simple. Only one wire connected to the transformer and another wire connected to the load. Typically, a 24 VAC power supply transformer, the thermostat, and 24 VAC HVAC equipment relay were all connected in a loop with each device having only two required external connections.
When electronics began to be used in thermostats, the fact that the thermostat was not directly wired to both sides of the transformer for its power source created a problem. This meant that the thermostat had to be hardwired directly from the system transformer. Direct hardwiring a common “C” wire from the transformer to the electronic thermostat may be very difficult and costly.
Because many households do not have a direct wire from the system transformer (such as a “C” wire), some thermostats have been designed to derive power from the transformer through the equipment load. The methods for powering an electronic thermostat from the transformer with a single direct wire connection to the transformer are called “power stealing” or “power sharing” methods. The thermostat “steals,” “shares,” or “harvests” its power during the “OFF” periods of the heating or cooling system by allowing a small amount of current to flow through it into the load coil below the load coil's response threshold (even at maximum transformer output voltage). During the “ON” periods of the heating or cooling system the thermostat draws power by allowing a small voltage drop across itself. Ideally, the voltage drop will not cause the load coil to dropout below its response threshold (even at minimum transformer output voltage). Examples of thermostats with power stealing capability include the Honeywell T8600, Honeywell T8400C, and the Emerson Model 1F97-0671. However, these systems do not have power storage means and therefore must always rely on power stealing.
Additionally, microprocessor controlled “intelligent” thermostats may have more advanced environmental control capabilities that can save energy while also keeping occupants comfortable. To do this, these thermostats require more information from the occupants as well as the environments where the thermostats are located. These thermostats may also be capable of connection to computer networks, including both local area networks (or other “private” networks) and wide area networks such as the Internet (or other “public” networks), in order to obtain current and forecasted outside weather data, cooperate in so-called demand-response programs (e.g., automatic conformance with power alerts that may be issued by utility companies during periods of extreme weather), enable users to have remote access and/or control thereof through their network-connected device (e.g., smartphone, tablet computer, PC-based web browser), and other advanced functionalities that may require network connectivity.
Issues arise in relation to providing microprocessor-controlled thermostats using high-powered user interfaces, one or more such issues being at least partially resolved by one or more of the embodiments described herein below. On the one hand, it is desirable to provide a thermostat having advanced functionalities such as those associated with relatively powerful microprocessors and reliable wireless communications chips, while also providing a thermostat that has an attractive, visually pleasing electronic display that users will find appealing to view and interact with. On the other hand, it is desirable to provide a thermostat that is compatible and adaptable for installation in a wide variety of homes, including a substantial percentage of homes that are not equipped with the “C” wire discussed above. It is still further desirable to provide such a thermostat that accommodates easy do-it-yourself installation such that the expense and inconvenience of arranging for an HVAC technician to visit the premises to install the thermostat can be avoided for a large number of users. It is still further desirable to provide a thermostat having such processing power, wireless communications capabilities, visually pleasing display qualities, and other advanced functionalities, while also being a thermostat that, in addition to not requiring a “C” wire, likewise does not need to be plugged into a household line current or a so-called “power brick,” which can be inconvenient for the particular location of the thermostat as well as unsightly. Therefore, improvements are needed in the art.
In one embodiment, smart-home device may be presented. The device may include a user interface including an electronic display having a first display mode and a second display mode, the first display mode generally requiring more power than said second display mode. The device may further include a processing system coupled to the user interface, the processing system being configured to be in operative communication with one or more environmental sensors for determining at least one environmental condition, and in operative communication with one or more input devices including the user interface. The device may also include at least one sensor configured to detect a physical closeness of a user to the at least one sensor, the at least one sensor being in operative communication with the processing system, the processing system being configured to cause the electronic display to be in the first display mode when a closeness threshold has been exceeded. The processing system is further configured to automatically adjust the closeness threshold based at least in part on a historical plurality of physical closeness events as detected by the at least one sensor.
In another embodiment, A method for optimizing the operation of a user interface of a smart-home device is presented. The method may include determining automatically, by a processing system, a closeness threshold based at least in part on a historical plurality of physical closeness events as detected by at least one sensor. The at least one sensor may be configured to detect a physical closeness of a user to the at least one sensor, the at least one sensor being in operative communication with the processing system. The method may also include detecting a physical closeness of a user to the at least one sensor and determining, by the processing system, that the closeness threshold has been exceeded, the processing system being configured to be in operative communication with one or more environmental sensors for determining at least one environmental condition, and in operative communication with one or more input devices including said user interface. The method may additionally include causing, by the processing system, an electronic display to be in a first display mode when the closeness threshold has been exceeded, the user interface including the electronic display having the first display mode and a second display mode, the first display mode generally requiring more power than said second display mode.
In yet another embodiment, a smart-home device may be presented. The device may include a user interface that is configured to operate in at least two different modes including a first mode and a second mode, where the user interface requires more power when operating in the first mode than in the second mode. The device may also include a plurality of sensors, including at least one sensor configured to detect a presence of a user within a proximity of the smart-home device. The device may additionally include a first processing function that is configured to determine a proximity profile and to cause the user interface to be in the first mode when one or more of the plurality of sensors provides one or more responses to the first processing function that matches the proximity profile, where the proximity profile may be determined using at least a history of responses from the plurality of sensors that are likely to coincide with times where one or more users intend to view the user interface.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention may be realized by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and the drawings. Also note that other embodiments may be described in the following disclosure and claims.
The subject matter of this patent specification relates to the subject matter of the following commonly assigned applications, each of which is incorporated by reference herein: International Application No. PCT/US12/00007 filed Jan. 3, 2012; and U.S. Ser. No. 13/467,025 filed May 8, 2012. The above-referenced patent applications are collectively referenced herein as “the commonly-assigned incorporated applications.”
In the following detailed description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments of the present invention. Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that these various embodiments of the present invention are illustrative only and are not intended to be limiting in any way. Other embodiments of the present invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having the benefit of this disclosure.
In addition, for clarity purposes, not all of the routine features of the embodiments described herein are shown or described. One of ordinary skill in the art would readily appreciate that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous embodiment-specific decisions may be required to achieve specific design objectives. These design objectives will vary from one embodiment to another and from one developer to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming but would nevertheless be a routine engineering undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
It is to be appreciated that while one or more embodiments are described further herein in the context of typical HVAC system used in a residential home, such as single-family residential home, the scope of the present teachings is not so limited. More generally, thermostats according to one or more of the preferred embodiments are applicable for a wide variety of enclosures having one or more HVAC systems including, without limitation, duplexes, townhomes, multi-unit apartment buildings, hotels, retail stores, office buildings, and industrial buildings. Further, it is to be appreciated that while the terms user, customer, installer, homeowner, occupant, guest, tenant, landlord, repair person, and/or the like may be used to refer to the person or persons who are interacting with the thermostat or other device or user interface in the context of one or more scenarios described herein, these references are by no means to be considered as limiting the scope of the present teachings with respect to the person or persons who are performing such actions.
Provided according to one or more embodiments are systems, methods, and computer program products for controlling one or more HVAC systems based on one or more versatile sensing and control units (VSCU units), each VSCU unit being configured and adapted to provide sophisticated, customized, energy-saving HVAC control functionality while at the same time being visually appealing, non-intimidating, and easy to use. The term “thermostat” is used herein below to represent a particular type of VSCU unit (Versatile Sensing and Control) that is particularly applicable for HVAC control in an enclosure. Although “thermostat” and “VSCU unit” may be seen as generally interchangeable for the contexts of HVAC control of an enclosure, it is within the scope of the present teachings for each of the embodiments herein to be applied to VSCU units having control functionality over measurable characteristics other than temperature (e.g., pressure, flow rate, height, position, velocity, acceleration, capacity, power, loudness, brightness) for any of a variety of different control systems involving the governance of one or more measurable characteristics of one or more physical systems, and/or the governance of other energy or resource consuming systems such as water usage systems, air usage systems, systems involving the usage of other natural resources, and systems involving the usage of various other forms of energy.
For this embodiment, the outer cap 108 can comprise an assembly that includes the outer ring 112, a cover 114, an electronic display 116, and a metallic portion 124. Each of these elements, or the combination of these elements, may be referred to as a “housing” for the thermostat 100. Simultaneously, each of these elements, or the combination of these elements, may also form a user interface. The user interface may specifically include the electronic display 116. In
Depending on the settings of the thermostat 100, the active display mode and the inactive display mode of the electronic display 116 may also or instead be characterized by the relative power usage of each mode. In one embodiment, the active display mode may generally require substantially more electrical power than the inactive display mode. In some embodiments, different operating modes of the electronic display 116 may instead be characterized completely by their power usage. In these embodiments, the different operating modes of the electronic display 116 may be referred to as a first mode and a second mode, where the user interface requires more power when operating in the first mode than when operating in the second mode.
According to some embodiments the electronic display 116 may comprise a dot-matrix layout (individually addressable) such that arbitrary shapes can be generated, rather than being a segmented layout. According to some embodiments, a combination of dot-matrix layout and segmented layout is employed. According to some embodiments, electronic display 116 may be a backlit color liquid crystal display (LCD). An example of information displayed on the electronic display 116 is illustrated in
According to some embodiments, the thermostat 100 can include additional components, such as a processing system 160, display driver 164, and a wireless communications system 166. The processing system 160 can adapted or configured to cause the display driver 164 to cause the electronic display 116 to display information to the user. The processing system 160 can also be configured to receive user input via the rotatable ring 112. These additional components, including the processing system 160, can be enclosed within the housing, as displayed in
The processing system 160, according to some embodiments, is capable of carrying out the governance of the thermostat's operation. For example, processing system 160 can be further programmed and/or configured to maintain and update a thermodynamic model for the enclosure in which the HVAC system is installed. According to some embodiments, the wireless communications system 166 can be used to communicate with devices such as personal computers, remote servers, handheld devices, smart phones, and/or other thermostats or HVAC system components. These communications can be peer-to-peer communications, communications through one or more servers located on a private network, or and/or communications through a cloud-based service.
Motion sensing as well as other techniques can be use used in the detection and/or prediction of occupancy, as is described further in the commonly assigned U.S. Ser. No. 12/881,430, supra. According to some embodiments, occupancy information can be a used in generating an effective and efficient scheduled program. For example, an active proximity sensor 170A can be provided to detect an approaching user by infrared light reflection, and an ambient light sensor 170B can be provided to sense visible light. The proximity sensor 170A can be used in conjunction with a plurality of other sensors to detect proximity in the range of about one meter so that the thermostat 100 can initiate “waking up” when the user is approaching the thermostat and prior to the user touching the thermostat. Such use of proximity sensing is useful for enhancing the user experience by being “ready” for interaction as soon as, or very soon after the user is ready to interact with the thermostat. Further, the wake-up-on-proximity functionality also allows for energy savings within the thermostat by “sleeping” when no user interaction is taking place or about to take place. The various types of sensors that may be used, as well as the operation of the “wake up” function are described in much greater detail throughout the remainder of this disclosure.
In some embodiments, the thermostat can be physically and/or functionally divided into at least two different units. Throughout this disclosure, these two units can be referred to as a head unit and a backplate.
In addition to physical divisions within the thermostat that simplify installation process, the thermostat may also be divided functionally between the head unit and the backplate.
In this embodiment, a processing function on the head unit may be implemented by an ARM processor. The head unit processing function may interface with the electronic display 402, an audio system 404, and a manipulation sensor 406 as a part of a user interface 408. The head unit processing function may also facilitate wireless communications 410 by interfacing with various wireless modules, such as a Wi-Fi module 412 and/or a ZigBee module 414. Furthermore, the head unit processing function may be configured to control the core thermostat operations 416, such as operating the HVAC system. The head unit processing function may further be configured to determine or sense occupancy 418 of a physical location, and to determine building characteristics 420 that can be used to determine time-to-temperature characteristics. Using the occupancy sensing 418, the processing function on the head unit may also be configured to learn and manage operational schedules 422, such as diurnal heat and cooling schedules. A power management module 462 may be used to interface with a corresponding power management module on the back plate, the rechargeable battery, and a power control circuit 464 on the back plate.
Additionally, the head unit processing function may include and/or be communicatively coupled to one or more memories. The one or more memories may include one or more sets of instructions that cause the processing function to operate as described above. The one or more memories may also include a sensor history and global state objects 424. The one or more memories may be integrated with the processing function, such as a flash memory or RAM memory available on many commercial microprocessors. The head unit processing function may also be configured to interface with a cloud management system 426, and may also operate to conserve energy wherever appropriate 428. An interface 432 to a backplate processing function 430 may also be included, and may be implemented using a hardware connector.
The backplate processing function may also include a sensor polling interface 448 to interface with a plurality of sensors. In this particular embodiment, the plurality of sensors may include a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, a PIR sensor, a proximity sensor, an ambient light sensor, and or other sensors not specifically listed. This list is not meant to be exhaustive. Other types of sensors may be used depending on the particular embodiment and application, such as sound sensors, flame sensors, smoke detectors, and/or the like. The sensor polling interface 448 may be communicatively coupled to a sensor reading memory 450. The sensor reading memory 450 can store sensor readings and may be located internally or externally to a microcontroller or microprocessor.
Finally, the backplate processing function can include a power management unit 460 that is used to control various digital and/or analog components integrated with the backplate and used to manage the power system of the thermostat. Although one having skill in the art will recognize many different implementations of a power management system, the power management system of this particular embodiment can include a bootstrap regulator 462, a power stealing circuit 464, a buck converter 466, and/or a battery controller 468.
By virtue of the configuration illustrated in
However, a “C” wire will typically only be present in about 20% of homes. Therefore, the powering circuitry 510 may also be configured to “steal” power from one of the other HVAC wires in the absence of a “C” wire. As used herein, “inactive power stealing” refers to the power stealing that is performed during periods in which there is no active call in place based on the lead from which power is being stolen. Thus, for cases where it is the “Y” lead from which power is stolen, “inactive power stealing” refers to the power stealing that is performed when there is no active cooling call in place. As used herein, “active power stealing” refers to the power stealing that is performed during periods in which there is an active call in place based on the lead from which power is being stolen. Thus, for cases where it is the “Y” lead from which power is stolen, “active power stealing” refers to the power stealing that is performed when there is an active cooling call in place. During inactive or active power stealing, power can be stolen from a selected one of the available call relay wires. While a complete description of the power stealing circuitry 510 can be found in the commonly assigned applications that have been previously incorporated herein by reference, the following brief explanation is sufficient for purposes of this disclosure.
Some components in the thermostat, such as the head unit processing function, the user interface, and/or the electronic display may consume more instantaneous power than can be provided by power stealing alone. When these more power-hungry components are actively operating, the power supplied by power stealing can be supplemented with the rechargeable battery 530. In other words, when the thermostat is engaged in operations, such as when the electronic display is in an active display mode, power may be supplied by both power stealing and the rechargeable battery 530. In order to preserve the power stored in the rechargeable battery 530, and to give the rechargeable battery 530 an opportunity to recharge, some embodiments optimize the amount of time that the head unit processing function and the electronic display are operating in an active mode. In other words, it may be advantageous in some embodiments to keep the head unit processing function in a sleep mode or low power mode and to keep the electronic display in an inactive display mode as long as possible without affecting the user experience.
When the head unit processing function and the electronic display are in an inactive or sleep mode, the power consumed by the thermostat is generally less than the power provided by power stealing. Therefore, the power that is not consumed by the thermostat can be used to recharge the rechargeable battery 530. In this embodiment, the backplate processing function 508 (MSP430) can be configured to monitor the environmental sensors in a low-power mode, and then wake the head unit processing function 532 (AM3703) when needed to control the HVAC system, etc. Similarly, the backplate processing function 508 can be used to monitor sensors used to detect the closeness of a user, and wake the head unit processing system 532 and/or the electronic display when it is determined that a user intends to interface with the thermostat.
It will be understood by one having skill in the art that the various thermostat embodiments depicted and described in relation to
Thermostat Proximity Thresholds
In thermostats that require power management systems, such as the embodiments described above, it may be desirable to intelligently control the times when an electronic display on a user interface operates in an active display mode. Even in thermostats that have a “C” wire available or are otherwise provided with sufficient external power, it may be still be desirable to intelligently control the electronic display. Users may prefer a thermostat that “activates” when they approach, thus presenting a user interface that seems responsive to a user even before a manipulation event.
In power-conscious systems, advanced electronic displays may be used to give the thermostat a modern and advanced look and feel. Such advanced electronic displays may include backlighting, LCD displays, color displays, graphic and/or raster display capabilities, rapid frame or refresh rates, and/or the like. These features may cause the electronic display to use a substantial amount of power. Additionally, these features may require a microcontroller or microprocessor to be interfaced with the electronic display. Significant processing operations may be required to display graphics, menus, animations, and/or color changes that signify temperature changes. Prior to this disclosure, such advanced electronic displays required external power or a “C” wire connection to the thermostat. Therefore, homes or locations where external power and/or “C” wires were not available were unable to use advanced thermostats without requiring significant electrical upgrades to the home or location. They were instead limited to thermostats with electronic displays that could operate solely on power provided by the call relay wires of the HVAC system.
However, in the thermostat embodiments described herein, advanced electronic displays may be used in conjunction with a rechargeable battery. As previously described, power can be “stolen” from a selected call relay wire, either actively or in actively, and can be used to charge a rechargeable battery and power the thermostat. Many advanced electronic displays, and the microprocessors required to control them, may together require more power than can be instantaneously provided by power stealing. In other words, powering an advanced electronic display and a microprocessor together using power stealing exclusively would likely cause the call relay in the HVAC system to trip, or to interpret the power stealing as an HVAC function call, resulting in inadvertent heating, cooling, fan activation, and/or the like.
Therefore, in power stealing systems, the electronic display should operate in an inactive display mode during times when it can be reliably inferred that a user is not approaching the thermostat in order to interact with thermostat or otherwise view the electronic display. During the inactive display mode, power stealing can supply more power than is needed to operate the thermostat, and the excess power can be used to charge the rechargeable battery. During times when it can be reliably inferred that a user is approaching the thermostat in order to interact with the thermostat or view the electronic display, the electronic display can operate in an active display mode. Although power stealing cannot reliably provide enough average power to operate the electronic display while in an active display mode, the rechargeable battery can provide additional power such that the HVAC system is not tripped.
Using a rechargeable battery enables the use of an advanced electronic display in power stealing systems, but only for limited times. It should be clear that if the electronic display continuously operates in an active display mode, the rechargeable battery would eventually lose its charge and no longer be able to supply sufficient power. Without the rechargeable battery, power stealing could not supply enough power without tripping the HVAC system. Therefore, methods and systems described herein provide technologies that can be used to intelligently control when an electronic display on a user interface should operate in an inactive display mode and an active display mode.
Again, these methods and systems for intelligently controlling the electronic display are not limited to power stealing systems. Environmental control devices having plenty of power available may also benefit from these embodiments. For example, users may prefer an electronic display that activates in a welcoming fashion as they approach. It may be useful turn off the electronic display in an unoccupied room to prevent excess light from being generated and affecting a darker ambience. Generally, it may also be useful to save power, no matter how it is provided, in accordance with environmental and sustainability concerns.
In one embodiment, the thermostat may include a processing system disposed within the housing and communicatively coupled to the user interface. The processing system may include one or more processing functions, as defined above. The processing system may also be configured to communicate with one or more sensors. The one or more sensors may be used to determine ambient air temperature and other environmental conditions. At least one of the sensors may be configured to detect a physical closeness of a user to the user interface of the thermostat. One or more of the sensors can be in operative communication with the processing system, and can be used to determine when a closeness threshold has been exceeded or when a proximity profile is matched by an approaching user. In response, the processing system can cause the user interface to be in an active display mode.
Merely generating a response from a sensor may not be sufficient to infer that a user is approaching the thermostat to view the electronic display. The actual response generated by a sensor when an event occurs within its associated responsive area will in many cases be dependent on the intensity of the event or the distance of the event to the thermostat. For example, if an event occurs along the periphery of the associated responsive area, the response of the sensor may be small. However, if an event occurs closer to the thermostat, the response of the sensor may be larger. Therefore, it is possible to determine a threshold for a sensor response in order to activate the electronic display.
For example, a sensor associated with responsive area 606 may be used to set a threshold to activate the electronic display. Generally, a threshold can correspond to a voltage/current output, a digital readout, the frequency, or other similar electrical output of a sensor. The threshold may correspond to a certain distance, such as distance 608 for an event having a known intensity. For example, a user approaching the thermostat 602 with a PIR sensor associated with responsive area 606 could trip a threshold when coming within distance 608 of the thermostat 602. Larger persons or persons moving rapidly may trip the threshold nearer or farther than distance 608 at the same threshold.
In one embodiment, the threshold may be referred to as a “closeness threshold.” When the closeness threshold is been violated, the processing system can be configured to cause the user interface and/or the electronic display to be in the active display mode. Violating the threshold may include a sensor response that is at or above the threshold value. In another embodiment, violating a threshold may include a sensor response that is at or above the threshold value for a predetermined time interval. In another embodiment, violating the threshold may require a sensor response to cross the threshold a predetermined number of times.
In embodiments similar to the thermostats described in
Although the discussion above concerning thresholds only uses single-value to thresholds, this is merely exemplary. Other embodiments may use multiple thresholds to form what may be called a “proximity profile.” A proximity profile may include multiple sensor readings. In one embodiment, a proximity profile may be comprised of a single threshold from a single sensor, while in other embodiments, a proximity profile may be comprised of characteristic responses from multiple sensors. Multiple sensors may be used to further generate an approach signature for users in each particular environment. For example, motion sensors, heat sensors, sound sensors, and/or biometric sensors may all provide responses to the processing function. In turn, the processing function may analyze all of these responses to determine whether they sufficiently match an expected approach signature. If these responses sufficiently match, then the processing function may determine that a user is approaching the thermostat to view the electronic display. Matching the proximity profile may be approximate, and may depend on each particular environment. A proximity profile may be matched if sensors provide responses within a certain range and within a certain delay interval between other sensors providing responses in certain ranges.
Because every environment can be different, the processing system may be configured to intelligently define the proper threshold and possibly to continuously refine the threshold throughout the lifetime of the thermostat to adapt to changing user patterns, locations, and/or environmental conditions within the area being monitored. Turning back to
In one embodiment, the processing system can be configured to automatically adjust the closeness threshold based at least in part on historical physical closeness events as detected by one or more proximity sensors. In one embodiment, a “physical closeness event” may include any response recorded by a proximity sensor that may be indicative of a user being within the responsive area of the proximity sensor. In another embodiment, a physical closeness event may include a series of responses from the proximity sensor no user is detected within the responsive area. This second embodiment defines physical closeness events in this manner because a threshold may be set slightly above an ambient noise level, as will be described further below.
In one exemplary situation, a proximity sensor having responsive area 606 may periodically provide sensor readings to the processing system for storage and analysis. When users are not found within the responsive area 606, an ambient noise level may be recorded. When users enter the responsive area 606, a response level may be recorded. Using a history of physical closeness events, the processing system may set a threshold somewhere between the ambient noise level and the response level associated with a user.
In one embodiment, distinguishing between an ambient noise level and a user response level may be difficult using only a single sensor. In this embodiment, one or more additional sensors may be used to distinguish between noise responses and user-based responses in the proximity sensor. For example, a proximity sensor associated with responsive area 606 may be used in conjunction with a physical manipulation sensor on the thermostat 602 and/or a second sensor associated with responsive area 604. Generally, each set of responses from the proximity sensor may be analyzed in conjunction with responses from the one or more additional sensors to determine whether the set of responses should be classified as noise or as a user-based response.
In this embodiment, the manipulation sensor and the second proximity sensor may be used to characterize the responses of the first proximity sensor. In one example, the proximity sensor may detect an event 808 that would seem to indicate a user approaching the thermostat. Turning to the other sensors, the manipulation sensor may also detect an event 810 that coincides with the vent 808 and indicates that a user has physically manipulated the user interface of the thermostat. Response 806 associated with the second proximity sensor does not show an event during the same time interval, which would indicate that a user manipulated the thermostat outside of the range of the second proximity sensor. This situation may occur when the user is standing to the side of the thermostat or behind a wall to which the thermostat is mounted. In analyzing responses 802, 804, and 806, the processing function may determine that event 808 on the proximity sensor is associated with a physical closeness event and an actual manipulation of the thermostat, and is therefore not ambient-level noise.
In another example, response 812 associated with the first proximity sensor may be difficult to classify as either a user-based response or an ambient noise response. By examining responses 814 and 816 associated with the other two sensors, the processing system may determine that event 812 corresponds to ambient noise, because no user was detected by the other two sensors.
In yet another example, event 818 associated with the first proximity sensor seems to indicate that a user has approached the thermostat. Similarly, event 820 associated with the manipulation sensor and event 822 associated with the second proximity sensor also seem to indicate that a user has approached the thermostat. Therefore, in this case, the processing system may readily determine that event 818 corresponds to a user-based event rather than ambient noise.
In yet another example (not shown) an event similar to event 808 could occur in response 802 associated with the first proximity sensor. Around the same time, response 806 of the second proximity sensor could also show event similar to event 822. Both of these events would seem to indicate a user approaching the thermostat. However, response 804 associated with the manipulation sensor could show event similar to event 814 indicating that the user did not manipulate the thermostat. The processing function could then determine that the situation should not be interpreted as a user intending to view the thermostat. In another embodiment, the processing function could also determine that this situation indicates that the user intended to view the electronic display of the thermostat without intending to manipulate the user interface physically. The processing function could then distinguish between these two situations using historical data.
These examples illustrate various ways to determine whether responses of a proximity sensor should be classified as ambient noise or a user approach. These determinations can be used to set a closeness threshold, which when violated would cause the electronic display to operate in the active display mode. In one embodiment, the various sensor readings can be divided into time intervals 824. Portions of response 802 of the first proximity sensor could be excluded if they occur around the same time as responses from one or more of the other sensors. For example, the time intervals that include event 808 and event 818 could be removed from consideration, while leaving the time interval containing event 812. An average value, maximum value, or other statistical characterization of the response within each remaining time interval could be used to set a threshold. In one embodiment, the threshold can be set at the maximum value from the remaining time intervals, signifying the maximum ambient noise level measured. In another embodiment, the threshold can be set at a predetermined level above the average value of the responses in the remaining time intervals. For example, a threshold could be set 20% above the average value of the remaining responses. In other embodiments, a closeness threshold could be set in relation to the responses in the remaining time intervals according to other known methods in light of this disclosure.
While
As was the case in the discussion related to
When using sensors with noise event similar to events 908, other precautions may be taken, for example, an average value for each time interval may be used rather than a maximum value. The closeness threshold could then be set a predetermined percentage above the maximum noise event level. Alternatively, the closeness threshold could be set a predetermined percentage below the minimum or maximum user-based response level. Either of these types of responses can be referred to as a physical closeness event, depending on the particular embodiment.
In one embodiment where the thermostat comprises a backplate and a head unit and where the backplate includes a first processor and the head unit includes a second processor, the operations of determining, adjusting, and testing the closeness threshold may be divided between the two processors. In one embodiment, the backplate processor may collect data from each of the sensors and provide the data periodically to the head unit processor. The backplate processor may first baseline the sensor data to be centered around zero. The backplate processor may also process the sensor data such that only a maximum, average, median, etc. value is sent for each of a predetermined number of time intervals. The head unit processor may then analyze the sensor data—either raw or processed—and determine a closeness threshold. The closeness threshold may then be sent back to the backplate processor. The backplate processor may then monitor one or more of the sensors, such as a proximity sensor to determine when and if the threshold is violated. When the threshold is determined by the backplate processor to be violated, the backplate processor can wake the head unit processor from a low-power mode, and the head unit processor can instruct the electronic display to operate in an active display mode, if it is not already operating in an active display mode. This arrangement may be advantageous in power-stealing systems to save power.
The method may also include determining physical closeness events (1004). In one embodiment, physical closeness events may correspond to sensor responses corresponding to users approaching the thermostat to view the electronic interface. In another embodiment, physical closeness events may correspond to sensor responses corresponding to users actually manipulating the user interface. As described above, physical closeness events associated with a single selected sensor may be determined by examining the responses of other sensors during nearby time intervals. In one embodiment, physical closeness events may then be eliminated from the history of sensor measurements and the threshold may be calculated based on the ambient noise level. In another embodiment, physical closeness events may then be isolated from the history of sensor measurements, and the threshold may be calculated based on user-based response levels.
The method may additionally include determining whether the threshold should be changed (1006). In one embodiment, the threshold need only be changed if the new threshold calculated by the history of sensor measurements over the time interval varies by a certain percentage. For example, the threshold need not change if the new threshold is only 1% more or less than the existing threshold. In another embodiment, the threshold may be updated if there is any change. In yet another embodiment, the newly calculated threshold may be averaged with previous thresholds to lessen the effect of measurement abnormalities. In another embodiment, thresholds that vary by more than a predetermined percentage may be discarded. For example, if a newly calculated threshold is double the existing threshold, the newly calculated threshold may be discarded. The newly calculated threshold may be assigned a weighted value in relation to previous thresholds and the threshold may be updated accordingly. For example, threshold calculated at night may be weighted less than threshold calculated during the day when more activity is expected. In light of this disclosure, one having skill in the art could combine or alter these various methods of determining when and how a threshold should be updated in accordance with the spirit of these embodiments.
If it is determined that the threshold should change, the method may further include updating the threshold (1008). The updated threshold may simply overwrite the previous threshold and a memory location. Alternatively, the updated threshold may be stored in a vector of thresholds such that a history of thresholds is maintained. The history of thresholds may be used to calculate and/or test future calculated thresholds. On the other hand, if it is determined that the threshold should not change, the method may further include waiting for new sensor data (1010). In embodiments where the head unit processor computes new thresholds and determines whether a current threshold should be updated, the head unit processor may enter a sleep state at this point. The backplate processor may then monitor new sensor data and either wake the head unit processor at a regular time interval, or provide a new history of sensor measurements when the head unit processor wakes for other reasons.
In one embodiment, the closeness threshold may be automatically adjusted based at least in part on the joint processing of a number of different factors. One factor may include a historical plurality of closeness events as detected by at least one of the plurality of sensors. Another factor may include a historical plurality of user interface manipulation events, in which the user has actually manipulated the user interface. The closeness threshold can be made less restrictive if there is a higher correlation between physical closeness events and the manipulation events. In other words, a threshold may be lowered if the responses of a first proximity sensor correspond to users actually manipulating the thermostat's user interface. Likewise, the closeness threshold may be made more restrictive if there is a lesser correlation between the physical closeness events and the manipulation events. This may correspond to situations where users often pass by the thermostat without stopping to manipulate the user interface. In these cases, there may not be any reason to turn on the electronic display, and the threshold may be raised in order to require a user to come closer to the thermostat before it enters into the active display mode.
Although the above discussion focuses on a single threshold, it should again be understood that these operations may also apply to a proximity profile that is constructed from one or more sensor responses. In this case, the thresholds or intervals related to each sensor that make up a proximity profile may be updated and adjusted individually in the same manner as described above for single thresholds.
The method may further include determining whether the threshold is violated (1106). In one embodiment, the threshold may be violated if one or more of the sensor responses is greater than or equal to the closeness threshold. In another embodiment, the threshold may be violated if one or more of the sensor responses is less than or equal to the closeness threshold. In another embodiment, the threshold may be violated if a number of sensor responses exceed a number represented by the threshold. In yet another embodiment, the threshold may be violated when the frequency of sensor responses exceeds a threshold frequency, or the number of threshold responses within a time interval exceeds a threshold number. Other methods of violating a threshold are also contemplated by various embodiments, but are not explicitly disclosed here for brevity. However, these various embodiments would be clear to one having skill in the art in light of this disclosure.
If it is determined that a threshold is violated, the method may additionally include causing the electronic display to operate in an active display mode (1108). In one embodiment, if the electronic display is already operating in an active display mode, then no action need be taken. However, if the electronic display is not operating in an active display mode, then the processing system may cause the electronic display to transition into an active display mode. On the other hand, if the threshold is not violated, the processing system may wait for additional sensor responses to compare to the threshold.
The problem with this situation is that the thermostat may be fooled into believing that each user approach should cause the electronic display to operate in the active display mode when they violate or exceed the closeness threshold of at least one proximity sensor. If the electronic display were to in fact transition to the active display mode each time the threshold was violated in this situation, the rechargeable battery could eventually drop below a predetermined level corresponding to reliable thermostat operations. In other words, if the electronic display turns on too often it will drain the rechargeable battery below reliable levels.
In order to solve this problem, a predetermined activity threshold may be set. The predetermined activity threshold may correspond to a maximum number of times within a predetermined time interval where the electronic display is allowed to transition into the active state without a corresponding manipulation event of the user interface. In other words, a limit may be set as to the number of times the electronic display can turn on over the course of, for example, 12 hours, without a user actually manipulating the user interface. When this activity threshold is violated, the processing system can require a manipulation event before causing the electronic display to operate in the active display mode.
Additionally, the closeness threshold can be altered such that it is more restrictive when this activity threshold is violated. Thus, the busy hallway situation of
Therefore, in one embodiment the closeness threshold can be automatically adjusted based on a tracked number of times that the electronic display was caused to be in the active display mode in response to physical closeness events over a predetermined time interval. The closeness threshold can be made more restrictive if the tracked number of times was greater than a predetermined activity threshold. This may effectively reduce excessive entry of the electronic display into the active display mode responsive to physical closeness events.
Whereas many alterations and modifications of the present invention will no doubt become apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art after having read the foregoing description, it is to be understood that the particular embodiments shown and described by way of illustration are in no way intended to be considered limiting. Therefore, reference to the details of the preferred embodiments is not intended to limit their scope.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/046,256 filed on Oct. 4, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/046,256 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/632,112 filed Sep. 30, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/632,112 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/627,996 filed Oct. 21, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/632,112 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/267,877, filed on Oct. 6, 2011, entitled “Strategic Reduction in Power Usage in Multi-Sensing, Wirelessly Communicating Learning Thermostat,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Prov. Ser. No. 61/415,771 filed Nov. 19, 2010; and of U.S. Prov. Ser. No. 61/429,093 filed Dec. 31, 2010, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3640455 | Romanelli | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3991357 | Kaminski | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4157506 | Spencer | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4183290 | Kucharczyk | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4223831 | Szarka | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4308991 | Peinetti et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4316577 | Adams et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4335847 | Levine | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4408711 | Levine | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4460125 | Barker et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4506827 | Jamieson et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4615380 | Beckey | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4646964 | Parker et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4656835 | Kidder et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4657179 | Aggers et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4674027 | Beckey | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4685614 | Levine | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4695246 | Beilfuss et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4742475 | Kaiser et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4751961 | Levine et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4768706 | Parfitt | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4842510 | Grunden et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4872828 | Mierzwinski et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4881686 | Mehta | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4897798 | Cler | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4948040 | Kobayashi et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4948044 | Cacciatore | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4955806 | Grunden et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 5005365 | Lynch | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5088645 | Bell | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5127464 | Butler et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5158477 | Testa et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5175439 | Haerer et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5211332 | Adams et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5224648 | Simon et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5226591 | Ratz | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5240178 | Dewolf et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5244146 | Jefferson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5255179 | Zekan et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5294047 | Schwer et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5347982 | Binzer et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5348078 | Dushane et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5352930 | Ratz | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5381950 | Aldridge | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5395042 | Riley et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5415346 | Bishop | May 1995 | A |
| 5476221 | Seymour | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5482209 | Cochran et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485954 | Guy et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5499196 | Pacheco | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5506569 | Rowlette | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5533668 | Erikson | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544036 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555927 | Shah | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5570837 | Brown et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5595342 | McNair et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5603451 | Helander et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5611484 | Uhrich | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5627531 | Posso et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5635896 | Tinsley et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5644173 | Elliason et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5673850 | Uptegraph | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5697552 | McHugh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5736795 | Zuehlke et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5761083 | Brown, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5802467 | Salazar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5808294 | Neumann | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5808602 | Sellers | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5839654 | Weber | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5902183 | D'Souza | May 1999 | A |
| 5903139 | Kompelien | May 1999 | A |
| 5909378 | De Milleville | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918474 | Khanpara et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926776 | Glorioso et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5931378 | Schramm | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5977964 | Williams et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6018944 | Davey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032867 | Dushane et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6060719 | DiTucci et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6062482 | Gauthier et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6066843 | Scheremeta | May 2000 | A |
| 6072784 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084518 | Jamieson | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6095427 | Hoium et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6098893 | Berglund et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6116512 | Dushane et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6164374 | Rhodes et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6206295 | LaCoste | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6213404 | Dushane et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216956 | Ehlers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6222719 | Kadah | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6275160 | Ha | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6286764 | Garvey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298285 | Addink et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6349883 | Simmons et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6356038 | Bishel | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6356204 | Guindi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6370894 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385510 | Hoog et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6415205 | Myron et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6453687 | Sharood et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6478233 | Shah | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6502758 | Cottrell | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6509838 | Payne et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6513723 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6519509 | Nierlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| D471825 | Peabody | Mar 2003 | S |
| 6566768 | Zimmerman et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6574581 | Bohrer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6604023 | Brown et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6619055 | Addy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6619555 | Rosen | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6622115 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622925 | Carner et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6644557 | Jacobs | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6645066 | Gutta et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6657418 | Atherton | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6743010 | Bridgeman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6769482 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6794771 | Orloff | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798341 | Eckel et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6851621 | Wacker et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| D503631 | Peabody | Apr 2005 | S |
| 6886754 | Smith et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6909921 | Bilger | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6951306 | DeLuca | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6975958 | Bohrer et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6983889 | Alles | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6990821 | Singh et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6997390 | Alles | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7000849 | Ashworth et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7024336 | Salsbury et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7055759 | Wacker et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7083109 | Pouchak | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7114554 | Bergman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7135965 | Chapman, Jr. et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7141748 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7149727 | Nicholls et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7149729 | Kaasten et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7156316 | Kates | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7159790 | Schwendinger et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7168627 | Kates | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7188482 | Sadegh et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7200467 | Schanin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7258280 | Wolfson | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7264175 | Schwendinger et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7274975 | Miller | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7287709 | Proffitt et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7289887 | Rodgers | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7299996 | Garrett et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7333880 | Brewster et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| D566587 | Rosen | Apr 2008 | S |
| 7360370 | Shah et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7379791 | Tamarkin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| RE40437 | Rosen | Jul 2008 | E |
| 7434742 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7451937 | Flood et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7455240 | Chapman, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7460690 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469550 | Chapman, Jr. et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7476988 | Mulhouse et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7509753 | Nicosia et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510126 | Rossi et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7537171 | Mueller et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7555364 | Poth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7558648 | Hoglund et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7571865 | Nicodem et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7575179 | Morrow et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7584899 | de Pauw et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7600694 | Helt et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7605714 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| D603277 | Clausen et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
| 7624931 | Chapman, Jr. et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634504 | Amundson | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7641126 | Schulz et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7644869 | Hoglund et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7693582 | Bergman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7702424 | Cannon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7703694 | Mueller et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| D61497 | Skafdrup et al. | May 2010 | S |
| 7726581 | Naujok et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7746242 | Schwendinger et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7755220 | Sorg et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7784704 | Harter | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7802618 | Simon et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7832465 | Zou et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7837128 | Helt et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7837958 | Crapser et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7845576 | Siddaramanna et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7847681 | Singhal et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7848900 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7849698 | Harrod et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7854389 | Ahmed | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7904209 | Podgorny et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7904830 | Hoglund et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7924155 | Soccoli et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7979791 | Yang et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8010237 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8019567 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8037022 | Rahman et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| D65152 | Mongell et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
| 8090477 | Steinberg | Jan 2012 | B1 |
| 8091375 | Crawford | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8131497 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8174381 | Imes et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8180492 | Steinberg | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8195313 | Fadell et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8219249 | Harrod et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8265798 | Imes | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8280536 | Fadell et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
| 8415829 | Di Cristofaro | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8442695 | Imes et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8560128 | Ruff et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8740101 | Leen et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8752771 | Warren et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8788103 | Warren et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9026254 | Warren et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9261287 | Warren et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9261289 | Ruff et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 20020005435 | Cottrell | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020074865 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030112262 | Adatia et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037555 | Street et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064335 | Canon | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090243 | Atherton | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231001 | Bruning | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040034484 | Solomita, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040120084 | Readio et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209209 | Chodacki et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040245349 | Smith | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249479 | Shorrock | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040256472 | DeLuca | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050043907 | Eckel et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050090915 | Geiwitz | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050119793 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125083 | Kiko | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128067 | Zakrewski | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150968 | Shearer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159847 | Shah et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189429 | Breeden | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192915 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050194455 | Alles | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050194456 | Tessier et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204997 | Fournier | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246408 | Chung | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050270151 | Yomoda et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280421 | Yomoda et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060017581 | Schwendinger et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060105697 | Aronstam et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060124759 | Rossi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147003 | Archacki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149395 | Archacki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060186214 | Simon et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060196953 | Simon et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206220 | Amundson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208099 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001830 | Gdagci et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038787 | Harris et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045430 | Chapman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045431 | Chapman, Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045433 | Chapman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070045444 | Gray et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050732 | Chapman et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070084941 | de Paul et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070114295 | Jenkins | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070114848 | Mulhouse et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115902 | Shamoon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070131787 | Rossi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070158442 | Chapman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173978 | Fein et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205297 | Finkam et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225867 | Moorer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070227721 | Springer et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070228183 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241203 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070257120 | Chapman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070296280 | Sorg et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080015740 | Osann | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015742 | Kulyk et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080054082 | Evans et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080099568 | Nicodem et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080128523 | Hoglund et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147242 | Roher et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161977 | Takach et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080183335 | Poth et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080185450 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080191045 | Harter | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215240 | Howard et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080245480 | Knight et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273754 | Hick et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080290183 | Laberge et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317292 | Baker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090001180 | Siddaramanna et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090045263 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140056 | Leen | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090140061 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090143916 | Boll et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171862 | Harrod | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194601 | Flohr | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090236433 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090243842 | Mitchell et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254225 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090259713 | Blumrich et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261174 | Butler et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090283603 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090297901 | Kilian et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090327354 | Resnick et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000239 | Lifson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006660 | Leen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100019051 | Rosen | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025483 | Hoeynck et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070084 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070086 | Harrod et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070234 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100084482 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107112 | Jennings et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100156608 | Bae et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100163633 | Barrett et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100167783 | Alameh et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168924 | Tessier et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100179704 | Ozog | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198425 | Donovan | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100211224 | Keeling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250009 | Lifson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100261465 | Rhoads et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262298 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100262299 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100273610 | Johnson | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280667 | Steinberg | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289643 | Trundle et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100301834 | Chemel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100305771 | Rodgers | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100308119 | Steinberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318227 | Steinberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001812 | Kang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110015798 | Golden | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110015802 | Imes | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110025257 | Weng | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110029488 | Fuerst et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046792 | Imes | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046805 | Bedros et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046806 | Nagel et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054699 | Imes et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110077896 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151837 | Winbush, III | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152024 | Kuehl | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160913 | Parker et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185895 | Freen | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110253796 | Posa et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282937 | Deshpande et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110307103 | Cheung et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110307112 | Barrilleaux | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120017611 | Coffel et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065935 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120066168 | Fadell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120085831 | Kopp | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101637 | Imes et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130546 | Matas et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158350 | Steinberg et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179300 | Warren | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120221151 | Steinberg | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120252430 | Imes et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130103207 | Ruff et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226354 | Ruff et al. | Aug 2013 | A9 |
| 20130228633 | Toth et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2202008 | Feb 2000 | CA |
| 101124705 | Feb 2008 | CN |
| 101282111 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 201345134 | Nov 2009 | CN |
| 101681460 | Mar 2010 | CN |
| 19609390 | Sep 1997 | DE |
| 207295 | Jan 1987 | EP |
| 434926 | Jul 1991 | EP |
| 196069 | Dec 1991 | EP |
| 720077 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 802471 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 1065079 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1398742 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1275037 | Feb 2006 | EP |
| 1731984 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 2157492 | Feb 2010 | EP |
| 3040802 | Jul 2016 | EP |
| 2212317 | May 1992 | GB |
| 2294828 | May 1996 | GB |
| 59106311 | Jun 1984 | JP |
| 1252850 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| H08-166818 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 9298780 | Nov 1997 | JP |
| H10-23565 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 2000-111122 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2002087050 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2001-051067 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002-350555 | Dec 2002 | JP |
| 2003054290 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2009-186139 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 1024986 | Jun 2005 | NL |
| 248851 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| 2008054938 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2009073496 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2010077558 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2011128416 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2012068591 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2013058969 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013052901 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| CN Patent Application No. 201280051997.2 filed Sep. 30, 2012, Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2016, all pages. |
| EU Patent Application No. 16153172.8 filed Sep. 30, 2012 Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 3, 2016, all pages. |
| Notice of Grounds of Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-078292, dated Apr. 5, 2016, 8 pages. English Translation. |
| Akhlaghinia, et al., “Occupancy Monitoring in Intelligent Environment through Integrated Wireless Localizing Agents,” IEEE, 2009, 7 pages. |
| Akhlaghinia, et al., “Occupant Behaviour Prediction in Ambient Intelligence Computing Environment,” Journal of Uncertain Systems, vol. 2, No. 2, 2008, pp. 85-100. |
| Allen, et al., “Real-Time Earthquake Detection and Hazard Assessment by ElarmS Across California,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, L00B08, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
| Aprilaire Electronic Thermostats Model 8355 User's Manual, Research Products Corporation, 2000, 16 pages. |
| Arens, et al., “Demand Response Electrical Appliance Manager—User Interface Design, Development and Testing,” Poster, Demand Response Enabling Technology Development, University of California Berkeley, Retrieved from dr.berkeley.edu/dream/posters/2005_6GUIposter.pdf, 2005, 1 page. |
| Arens, et al., “Demand Response Enabled Thermostat—Control Strategies and Interface,” Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Poster, University of California Berkeley, Retrieved from dr.berkeley.edu/dream/posters/2004_11CEC_TstatPoster.pdf, 2004, 1 page. |
| Arens, et al., “Demand Response Enabling Technology Development,” Phase I Report: Jun. 2003-Nov. 2005, Jul. 27, P:/DemandRes/UC Papers/DR-Phase1Report-Final Draft April24-26.doc, University of California Berkeley, pp. 1-108. |
| Auslander, et al., “UC Berkeley DR Research Energy Management Group,” PowerPoint Presentation, DR ETD Workshop, State of California Energy Commission, Jun. 11, 2007, pp. 1-35. |
| Bourke, “Server Load Balancing,” O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Aug. 2001, 182 pages. |
| Braeburn 5200, Braeburn Systems, LLC, 2011, 11 pages. |
| Braeburn 5300 Installer Guide, Graeburn Systems, LLC, 2011, 11 pages. |
| Chatzigiannakis, et al., “Priority Based Adaptive Coordination of Wireless Sensors and Actors”, [online] Q2SWinet '06, Oct. 2, 2006 [ Retrieved on Mar. 12, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1163681>. |
| Chen, et al., “Demand Response-Enabled Residential Thermostat Controls,” Abstract, ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Mechanical Engineering Dept. and Architecture Dept., University of California Berkeley, 2008, pp. 1-24 through 1-36. |
| Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2015, for Chinese Patent Application No. CN201280051997.2 filed on Sep. 30, 2012, all pages. |
| Deleeuw, “Ecobee WiFi Enabled Smart Thermostat Part 2: The Features Review,” Retrieved from <URL: http://www.homenetworkenabled.com/content.php?136-ecobee-WiFi-enabled-Smart-Thermostat-Part-2-The-Features-review>, Dec. 2, 2011, 5 pages. |
| Ecobee Smart Si Thermostat Installation Manual, Ecobee, 2012, 40 pages. |
| Ecobee Smart Si Thermostat User Manual, Ecobee, 2012, 44 pages. |
| Ecobee Smart Thermostat Installation Manual, 2011, 20 pages. |
| Ecobee Smart Thermostat User Manual, 2010, 20 pages. |
| Electric Heat Lock Out on Heat Pumps, Washington State University Extension Energy Program, Apr. 2010, pp. 1-3. |
| Energy Joule, Ambient Devices, 2011, [retrieved on Aug. 1, 2012]. Retrieved from: http://web.archive.org/web/20110723210421/http://www.ambientdevices.com/products/energyjoule.html, 3 pages. |
| European Search Report dated Dec. 5, 2014, for European Patent Application No. 12841936.3 filed on Sep. 30, 2012, all pages. |
| Gao, et al., “The Self-Programming Thermostat: Optimizing Setback Schedules Based on Home Occupancy Patterns,” In Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, Nov. 3, 2009, 6 pages. |
| Green, “Thermo Heat Tech Cool”, Popular Mechanics Electronic Thermostat Guide, Oct. 1985, pp. 155-158. |
| Honeywell CT2700, An Electronic Round Programmable Thermostat—User's Guide, Honeywell, Inc., 1997, 8 pages. |
| Honeywell CT8775A, C. The digital Round Non-Programmable Thermostats—Owner's Guide, Honeywell International Inc., 2003, 20 pages. |
| Honeywell Installation Guide FocusPRO TH6000 Series, Honeywell International, Inc. 2012, 24 pages. |
| Honeywell Operating Manual FocusPRO TH6000 Series, Honeywell International, Inc., 2011, 80 pages. |
| Honeywell Prestige IAQ Product Data 2, Honeywell International, Inc., 2012, 126 pages. |
| Honeywell Prestige THX9321 and TXH9421 Product Data, Honeywell International, Inc., 68-0311, No Date Given, 126 pages. |
| Honeywell Prestige THX9321-9421 Operating Manual, Honeywell International, Inc., 2011, 120 pages. |
| Honeywell T8700C, An Electronic Round Programmable Thermostat—Owner's Guide, Honeywell, Inc., 1997, 12 pages. |
| Honeywell T8775 The Digital Round Thermostat, Honeywell, 2003, 2 pages. |
| Honeywell T8775AC Digital Round Thermostat Manual No. 69-1679EF01, www.honeywell.com/your home, Jun. 2004, pp. 1-16. |
| Hunter Internet Thermostat Installation Guide, Hunter Fan Co., Aug. 14, 2012, 8 pages. |
| ICY 3815TT-001 Timer-Thermostat Package Box, ICY BV Product Bar Code No. 8717953007902, 2009, 2 pages. |
| International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/058210, International Search Report & Written Opinion, dated Dec. 11, 2012, mailed 15 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 22, 2014, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/058210 filed Sep. 30, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Introducing the New Smart Si Thermostat, Datasheet [online]. Ecobee, Mar. 2012 [retrieved on Feb. 25, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.ecobee.com/solutions/home/smart-si/>, Mar. 12, 2012, 4 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2011, or Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-537088 filed on Sep. 30, 2012, all pages. |
| Lennox ComfortSense 5000 Owners Guide, Lennox Industries, Inc., 2007, 32 pages. |
| Lennox ComfortSense 7000 Owners Guide, Lennox Industries, Inc., 2009, 15 pages. |
| Lennox iComfort Manual, Lennox Industries, Inc., 2010, 20 pages. |
| Loisos, et al., “Buildings End-Use Energy Efficiency: Alternative to Compressor Cooling,” California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research, Jan. 2000, 80 pages. |
| Lu, et al., “The Smart Thermostat: Using Occupancy Sensors to Save Energy in Homes”, In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Nov. 305, 2010, pp. 211-224. |
| Lux PSPU732T Manual, Lux Products Corporation, Jan. 6, 2009, 48 pages. |
| Meier, et al., “Thermostat Interface Usability: A Survey”, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Enviornmental Energy Technologies Division, Berkeley California, Sep. 2010, pp. 1-73. |
| Mozer, “The Neural Network House: An Environmental that Adapts to it's inhabitants,” AAAI Technical Report SS-98-02, 1998, pp. 110-114. |
| NetX RP32—WiFi Network Thermostat Consumer Brochure, Network Thermostat, No Date Given, 2 pages. |
| NetX RP32—WiFi Network Thermostat Specification Sheet, Network Thermostat, 2012, 2 pages. |
| Peffer, et al., “A Tale of Two Houses: The Human Dimension of Demand Response Enabling Technology from a Case Study of Adaptive Wireless Thermostat,” Abstract, ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings Architecture Dept. And Mechanical Engineering Dept., University of California Berkeley., 2008, pp. 7-242 through 7-253. |
| Peffer, et al., “Smart Comfort at Home: Design of a Residential Thermostat to Achieve Thermal Comfort, and Save Money and Peak Energy,” University of California Berkeley, Mar. 2007, 1 page. |
| RobertShaw Product Manual 9620, Maple Chase Company, 2001, 14 pages. |
| RobertShaw Product Manual 9825i1, Maple Chase company 2006, 36 pages. |
| Ros, et al., “Multi-Sensor Human Tracking with the Bayesian Occupancy Filter”, IEEE, 2009, 8 pages. |
| Salus, “S-Series Digital Thermostat Instruction Manual-ST620 Model No. Instruction Manual,” www.salus-tech.com, Version 005, Apr. 29, 2010, 24 pages. |
| Sanford, “iPod (Click Wheel) (2004),” www.apple-history.com, Retrieved from http://apple-history.com/ipod, Apr. 9, 2012, 2 pages. |
| SYSTXCCUIZ01-V Infinity Control Installation Instructions, Carrier Corp., 2012, 20 pages. |
| T8611G Chronotherm IV Deluxe Programmable Heat Pump Thermostat Product Data, Honeywell International Inc., 1997, 24 pages. |
| TB-PAC, TB-PHP, Base Series Programmable Thermostats, Carrier Corp., 2012, 8 pages. |
| The Clever Thermostat User Manual and Installation Guide, ICY BV ICY3815 Timer-Thermostat, 2009, pp. 1-36. |
| The Clever Thermostat, ICY BV Web Page, http://www.icy.nl/en/consumer/products/clever-thermostat, ICY BV, 2012, 1 page. |
| The Perfect Climate Comfort Center PC8900A W8900A-C Product Data Sheet, Honeywell International Inc., Apr. 2001, 44 pages. |
| TP-PAC, TP-PHP, TP-Nac, TP-NHP Perormance Series AC/HP Themrostat Installation Instructions, Carrier Corp., Sep. 2007, 56 pages. |
| Trane Communicating Thermostats for Fan Coil, Trane, May 2011, 32 pages. |
| Trane Communicating Thermostats for Heat Pump Control, Trane, May 2011, 32 pages. |
| Trane Install XL600 Installation Manual, Trane, Mar. 2006, 16 pages. |
| Trane XL950 Installation Guide, Trane, Mar. 2011, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/512,886. Volkswagen Rotary Knob for Motor Vehicle—English Translation of German Application filed Oct. 20, 2003. |
| Venstar T2900Manual, Venstar, Inc., 2008, 113 pages. |
| Venstar T5800Manual, Venstar, Inc., No Date Given, 63 pages. |
| VisionPRO TH8000 Series Installation Guide, Honeywell International, Inc., 2012, 12 pages. |
| VisionPRO TH8000 Series Operating Manual, Honeywell International, Inc., 2012, 96 pages. |
| VisionPRO Wi-Fi Programmable Thermostat, Honeywell International, Inc. Operating Manual, 2012, 48 pages. |
| White Rodgers (Emerson) Model 1F81-261 Installation and Operating Instructions, White Rodgers, No Date Given, 63 pages. |
| White Rodgers (Emerson) Model IF98EZ-1621 Howeowner's User Guide, White Rodgers, No Date given, 28 pages. |
| White, et al., “A Conceptual Model for Simulation Load Balancing,” Proceedings 1998 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 1998, 7 pages. |
| Wong, et al., “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of ARMA Model with Error Processes for Replicated Observations,” National University of Singapore, Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 0217, 2002, 19 pages. |
| Wright, et al., “DR ETD—Summary of New Thermostat, TempNode & New Meter (UC Berkeley Project)”, Power Point Presentation, Public Interest Energy Research, University of California Berkeley. Retrievd from: http://dr.berkeley.edu/dream/presentations/2005_6_CEC.pdf, 2005, pp. 1-49. |
| Third Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280051997.2, dated Mar. 21, 2016, 14 pages. English Translation. |
| Arens et al., “New Thermostat Demand Response Enabling Technology”, Poster, University of California Berkeley, Jun. 10, 2004, 1 page. |
| Braeburn 5300 Installer Guide, Braeburn Systems, LLC, Dec. 9, 2009, 10 pages. |
| Detroitborg, “Nest Learning Thermostat: Unboxing and Review”, [online]. Feb. 2012 [retrieved on Aug. 22, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrgcOL4oLzc>. |
| Honeywell Prestige THX9321 and TXH9421 Product Data, Honeywell International, Inc., 68-0311, Jan. 2012, 126 pages. |
| Lennox ComfortSense 5000 Owners Guide, Lennox Industries, Inc., Feb. 2009, 32 pages. |
| Lu et al., “The Smart Thermostat: Using Occupancy Sensors to Save Energy in Homes”, In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Nov. 3-5, 2010, pp. 211-224. |
| NetX RP32-Wifi Network Thermostat Consumer Brochure, Network Thermostat, May, 2011, 2 pages. |
| Venstar T5800 Manual, Venstar, Inc. Sep. 7, 2011, 63 pages. |
| VisionPRO TH8000 Series Operating Manual, Honeywell International, Inc. Mar. 2001, 96 pages. |
| White Rodgers (Emerson) Model 1F81-261 Installation and Operating Instructions, White Rodgers, Apr. 15, 2010, 8 pages. |
| White Rodgers (Emerson) Model IF98EZ-1621 Homeowner's User Guide, White Rodgers, Jan. 25, 2012, 28 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action for Patent Application No. 2,853,049 dated Aug. 3, 2018, all pages. |
| European Office Action for Patent Application No. 16 153 172.8 dated Feb. 1, 2018, 5 pages. |
| International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/059107, International Search Report & Written Opinion, dated Jan. 3, 2013, 10 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/059107 dated Apr. 15, 2014, 10 pages. |
| Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280051997.2, dated Aug. 27, 2015, 6 pages. [no English translation]. |
| Notice of Publication for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280051997.2, Applicant: Nest Labs, Inc., dated Jul. 2, 2014, all pages. |
| Notification on Grant of Patent Right for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280051997.2, Applicant: Nest Labs, Inc., dated Feb. 8, 2017, 4 pages. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application. No. 2014-537088, dated Nov. 17, 2014, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for Japanese Patent Application. No. 2014-537088, dated Mar. 9, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Notice of Publication for Chinese Patent Application No. 2017102744122.9, Applicant: Google Inc., dated Nov. 1, 2017, all pages. |
| First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 2017102744122.9, dated Dec. 10, 2018, all pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160162008 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61627996 | Oct 2011 | US | |
| 61415771 | Nov 2010 | US | |
| 61429093 | Dec 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14046256 | Oct 2013 | US |
| Child | 15044096 | US | |
| Parent | 13632112 | Sep 2012 | US |
| Child | 14046256 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13267877 | Oct 2011 | US |
| Child | 13632112 | US |
