This application is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2012/065124 filed Aug. 2, 2012, which claims the benefit of EP application number 11176287.8, filed Aug. 2, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a pressurised container for storing and dispensing an aggressive product. More particularly, the present invention relates to an aerosol container adapted for use with aggressive products such as hair mousse for example.
Today, hair mousse is almost exclusively packaged in aluminium aerosol containers, coated internally with a high performance lacquer of PAI (polyamide-imide) chemistry. Under REACH regulations this lacquer chemistry has been classified as CMR-2 (CMR—carcinogenic, mutagenic, toxic to reproduction and category 2—strongly suspected to trigger or increase the frequency of CMR effects). There exists the possibility that the use of this material could eventually be banned under the REACH regulations. (REACH is a European Union regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation & restriction of Chemicals.) Since December 2010, such material has been classified as R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child), R37/36/38 (irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin) and must be labelled as toxic. Therefore, it is socially & environmentally responsible to avoid using such a classification of chemical, wherever possible.
WO 02/072449 A (GLAXO GROUP) Jul. 9, 2002 describes a canister for use in metered dose inhalers formed from a laminate material composed of a metal and a strengthening material. The laminate is described as providing equivalent or greater strength than ticker walled aluminium containers. However, this is different to the problem addressed by the present invention, where the container is required to store and dispense an aggressive product requiring a high performance, corrosion resistant lacquer.
U.S. 2007272768 A Nov. 29, 2007 discloses a container for pressurised materials having a multi-layer construction, particularly water-based adhesives. The inner layer is described as being resistant to corrosion from contact with water. However, this document does not discuss aggressive personal care or household products and rather is focussed on adhesives that must not be exposed to air before being expelled from the container.
EP 0854827 B (PROCTER & GAMBLE) Mar. 1, 2000 discloses an aerosol can, filled with an acidic detergent composition, and having a plastic liner to provide protection for the can. According to this patent, the liner/container assembly is filled with an aggressive product (for example an acidic detergent composition) and an aerosol propellant. The plastic liner is preferably made from a polyolefin material, more preferably high density polyethylene or polypropylene. However, this patent also notes that hydrocarbon propellants will diffuse through polyolefin materials with time.
The inventors have appreciated the benefit of using a separate liner to protect an outer aerosol container as described in this patent. In particular, the inventors noted that as long as the liner is compatible with the product or composition and propellant, the product/propellant combination may be stored within the liner, without worrying about the adverse effect of the product/propellant combination on the outer aerosol container. The use of a liner in this way provides a possible solution to the problems associated with using a high performance, but potentially toxic lacquer to coat the inside of a metal aerosol can when packaging aggressive products. Furthermore, provision of a liner allows the outer aerosol container to be produced using a wider range of materials and techniques e.g. conventional steel, aluminium or plastic containers may be provided, manufactured using known 2-piece, 3-piece or impact extrusion techniques. However, diffusion of the propellant through the liner or bag over time will gradually reduce the effectiveness of the aerosol container in dispensing the product and is unsatisfactory for a user of the aerosol can.
Accordingly, the inventor has proposed an aerosol container having an outer container body with a separate plastic liner or bag arranged therein, into which both product and propellant are filled, characterised in that the plastic liner or bag has a multi-layer construction. The liner or bag comprises a layer that is resistant to the product and a layer that prevents diffusion of the propellant out of the liner or bag. Further layers may also be incorporated to provide additional properties as required, for example an oxygen barrier, scavenging etc. Furthermore, one or more tie-layers, such as adhesive for example, may be provided to hold the separate layers together.
In particular, the inventors propose a multi-layer bag into which both propellant and hair mouse formulation are filled. The bag is made up of a nylon outer layer (20%)—nylon being chosen for it's barrier properties to LPG (Liquid Petroleum Gas) i.e. to keep the propellant in the bag with the formulation, an adhesive layer (5%)—chosen to bind the outer and inner layers together and not allow delamination which would affect bag performance, and a low density polyethylene (LDPE) inner layer (75%)—chosen for it's barrier properties to the formulation i.e. to keep the formulation inside the bag from leaching out and attacking the can. The percentages of nylon and LDPE were chosen to provide a bag which is most cost effective (LDPE being much cheaper than nylon), yet flexible enough to insert into the metal can body, through the valve aperture, without the need for conditioning and which is able to expand gently under pressure (i.e. when filled) to fit inside the can body as closely as possible.
The liner or bag may be produced from a sheet of multilayer material, which is sealed together around its periphery, apart from an open portion, which is left unsealed to provide an aperture for filling. A disadvantage of this design is that once the liner or bag is filled with product and propellant, it will experience internal pressure, which may result in breaks in the sealed periphery, causing the seams of the liner or bag to leak. This may be mitigated to some extent by the external support provided by the outer container body, but any leaks will obviously defeat the object of the invention as the product/propellant may escape the liner or bag and come into direct contact with the outer container. Preferably, the bag or liner is of unitary construction such as that produced by extrusion blow moulding or injection blow moulding for example.
The liner or bag according to the invention has the advantage of strength under pressure from the inside (rather than the outside) versus the known bag-on-valve (BOV) design. It is strongly suspected that the current bag-on-valve (BOV) technology would be unfit for this purpose, as constraining the necessary internal pressure in the laminate bag would be too great for the heat seal between the bag and the valve stem.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. In which:
Referring to
The filler will then fill the liner or bag 40 with product and propellant and insert a valve assembly to seal the finished aerosol container, before selling the filled aerosol to a consumer. The filler may fill the liner or bag 40 with the product before fitting the valve and then fill the propellant through the valve to pressurise the container or the filler may choose to fit the valve onto the container and then fill both the product and the propellant through the valve.
Upon filling the bag 40 with the product and/or propellant 60, the weight of the product may cause the bag 40 to make contact with the bottom 20. Also, upon pressurising the bag 40 with the propellant, the bag 40 may expand and make contact with the body 10. The bag 40 is designed to be sufficiently flexible to accommodate this expansion.
Referring to the detailed section shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11176287.8 | Aug 2011 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/065124 | 8/2/2012 | WO | 00 | 6/18/2014 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/017652 | 2/7/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20070272768 | Williams et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0854827 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1065156 | Jan 2001 | EP |
2458222 | Sep 2009 | GB |
WO 02072449 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2011024553 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140326729 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |