The following lists some prior art which presently appears relevant:
Disruption of cells and tissues is a common procedure carried out in biology laboratories to release nucleotides, proteins, virus, small molecules, chemicals, or whole cells for scientific analysis. It is often desirable to disrupt many samples simultaneously in individual tubes or containers to avoid cross contamination and to save time. A striking technology has been described to mechanically disrupt substances in tubes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,769,538 to Sherman). This technology is based on strikers that rotate around a hub or an axis and rapidly contact the tubes with contents inside. The impact of the strikers on the tubes induces turbulent motion of the contents, resulting in mixing, resuspension, homogenization or disruption of the tube contents.
The thoroughness of the mixing, resuspension, homogenization or disruption of the substances depends upon the force and frequency that the strikers impact the tube. Tubes made of plastic or another brittle material may crack or break on impact, splattering contents and risking cross-contamination of other tubes. In addition, the cap on the tube may loosen or completely open. The area of impact of the strikers on the tube will also affect the performance of the striking technology. If the tube is struck in a position that is too high or too low, momentum transfer between the striker and the tube may not be sufficient, or the tube may crack. If the height of strikers on the axis/hub is non-adjustable, the striking technology can only be used with one tube size or shape.
In addition, the Sherman patent called for an upper and lower plate to hold the tubes in place, limiting the movement of the tubes and thus limiting the agitation of the tube contents. Because of these conditions, a user who wanted to use several different tube sizes would need a separate model specifically designed for each tube type. Multiple models would inconvenience the user with significant extra cost and require extra laboratory space. Keeping extra units in storage to save space would only increase time lost to equipment set up.
In the prior art, a motor connected to the hub provides the rotational movement that controls the force and frequency at which the strikers impact the tubes. As the number of tubes in the prior art increases the rotational velocity of the motor will decrease. We have found that the hub will rotate at a faster speed when unimpeded than when the strikers come in contact with tubes. The tubes give resistance which opposes the rotational velocity of the motor. With a greater number of tubes in the prior art's mixer, each tube will receive fewer or weaker impacts compared to a lesser number of tubes. This results in a reduction of thoroughness of disruption/mixing of tube contents. Inversely if a tube breaks, the resistance felt by the strikers will decrease. This would result in faster rotation of the strikers. This increasing speed would increase the risk of additional tubes breaking. Tubes with samples of larger mass would also create more resistance for the motor, and decreasing the prior art's effectiveness. The prior art lacks a form of feedback to detect tubes breaking, and control the speed for a desired level of impact. In addition, the prior art has no way to compensate for the mass or viscosity of the samples in the tubes
We have found that an issue experienced by the prior art was a build-up of heat within the tubes due to friction from direct impacts by the strikers. Heat rising within samples can create adverse conditions for some methods of scientific analysis. Additionally, we have found that impacts on tubes result in a very loud running volume. The user may experience an uncomfortable level of noise, often times too loud to hold a normal conversation while in close proximity. Many users preferred to be in another room while the units ran. Covering the unit would reduce the noise but doing this would exacerbate heat build-up by restricting or limiting ambient air.
It would be desirable to have a device to protect the tubes while they receive maximum force from the strikers for effective mixing, resuspension, homogenization or disruption. In addition, it would be desirable for the striking technology to conveniently allow for different sizes, shapes and quantities of tubes while protecting the tubes from breaking and ensuring that each tube receives the desired striking impact at the optimal position regardless of the number of tubes present in the unit. It would also be desirable to reduce both the heat build-up on tubes, and the loud running noise.
Advantages
Accordingly, several advantages of one or more aspects of the current invention are as follows: protection of the sample tube from the impacts, thus allowing more frequent impacts and impacts of greater magnitude, limitation of caps loosening, reduction of heat build-up, reduction of noise, interchangeability of sample tubes, consistent performance, automatic shut-off in the case of a tube failure. Further advantages of one or more aspects of the current invention will become apparent from a consideration of the drawings and the detailed disclosure.
Summary
One or more aspects of the present invention provide a protective sleeve with a space allotted for a tube. The energy from the impact of the strikers onto the protective sleeve will be transferred to the tube over a larger surface area, allowing the tube to be impacted without sustaining damage or having the cap loosened or opened. In an embodiment, the open base and material composition allow for the sleeve to deform upon impact, increasing the momentum transfer from the striker to the tube. The protective sleeve will protect tubes from impacting strikers inside of an agitation apparatus. Additionally this extra layer of protection will reduce heat build-up in the tubes due to friction from impacting strikers.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a removable module able to hold a set number of tubes. In an embodiment, the module contains a rotatable hub shaft with strikers. The module fits inside of a base unit or control enclosure containing a motor. The hub shaft in the module attaches to the motor in the base unit, providing rotational movement to spin the strikers around the rotatable hub and strike the tubes. Multiple interchangeable modules accommodating different sized tubes or placement configurations can be used with a single control enclosure. The control enclosure uses a sensor to identify the module that is inserted and adjusts the operational parameters for the type of tubes used in said module.
Having multiple interchangeable modules with a single control enclosure is convenient and cost effective compared to having several standalone apparatuses. In an embodiment, the module, located inside the control enclosure, provides a layer of sound isolation close to the source of the noise. The control enclosure provides a second layer of sound isolation, thereby reducing the level of noise observed by the user.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method for adjusting the magnitude or frequency of the impacts, based upon the load, which includes the number of tubes and the mass of the content in them. Additionally the invention has the ability to sense when a tube has broken and stop the apparatus from running.
a shows a diametric view, in accordance with one embodiment, of a protective sleeve for a tube, a detachable module containing a striking mechanism and a control enclosure for retaining and controlling the module. Hatched lines show cut away portions for a clearer illustration of the internal geometry.
b shows a diametric view of the module. Hatched lines show cut away portions for a clearer illustration of the internal geometry.
c shows the module in its open configuration, and loaded with eight protective sleeves.
d shows the module inserted or installed in the base unit. Hatched lines show cut away portions for a clearer illustration of the internal geometry.
e shows a side cut away view of the module inserted into the base unit. Hatched lines show cut away portions for a clearer illustration of the internal geometry.
a shows an isometric view of the protective sleeve for a tube, with hidden lines shown dotted, in accordance with one embodiment.
b shows a top view of the protective sleeve in accordance with one embodiment.
c shows a cross sectional view of the protective sleeve in accordance with one embodiment.
a shows a general flow chart for the method in which the electronics control the speed of the strikers.
b to 3d show more particularized flow charts for the method in which the electronics control the speed of the strikers.
One embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Mounted to the inside of the outer housing 16 on the bottom face is a motor mounting plate 20. A variable speed electric motor 22 is affixed to the center of the motor mounting plate 20. A drive shaft 24 projects upward to a lower disconnecting coupling half 26. Extending vertically upward from the motor mounting plate 20 are four bottom standoffs or supports 28.
Each of the bottom standoffs 28 contain a guide hole 30 on their top face which aligns with a pin 32 on the underside of a set of four upper standoffs 34. The upper standoffs 34 act to guide a removable assembly or module 36 into the control enclosure 10.
In the module 36, affixed to the other end of the upper standoffs 34, is a sleeve holding plate 38. In this embodiment, the sleeve holding plate 38 has multiple cylindrically cut holes 40 in its surface. Several cylindrically cut holes 40 are not shown due to the cut away view.
Within each cylindrically cut hole 40 hangs a removable protective casing or protective sleeve 42. In this embodiment, shown in
The following refers to
Enclosing the module 36 and extending down from the tube holding plate 38, is a module catch basin 64. The module catch basin 64 envelopes the lower half of the module 36 and has an opening or coupling access port 66 centered at its bottom to expose the upper disconnecting coupling half 55. Enclosing the upper half of the module 36 is a module lid 68, shown detached in
Referring back to
Referring back to
Operation
A first embodiment of the control enclosure 10 allows for interchangeable modules to be installed. A user chooses a module such as the module 36 shown in this embodiment. Opening the outer lid 18 the user lowers the module 36 into the module cavity 84, aligning the upper standoff pins 32 with the lower standoffs 28. When the module 36 is in its lowest seated position, the coupling halves 26 & 55 will mate, forming a physical connection from the motor shaft 24 to the hub shaft 54.
The module sensor 92, shown in
Using the handle 81 the user then rotates the module lid 68 and lifts up from the module 36, revealing the sleeve holding plate 38. An open module 36 is shown in
The action of the tubes' 12 agitation is described here. When the motor 22 is powered by the electronics (not shown, but known to a person of ordinary skill in the art), it rotates the attached hub 56. This spinning will extend the pendulum arms 60 and strikers 62. The extended pendulum arms 60 impact the side of the tubular main cylinder 46. From this impact the protective sleeve 42 tilts away from the spinning strikers 62.
The control enclosure 10 creates an oscillating motion for the tubes 12. The action of tube oscillations is achieved from the frequent impacts on the protective sleeves 42. Upon impact each protective sleeve 42 pivots at the cylindrically cut hole 40, tilting the bottom of the protective sleeve 42 away from the strikers 62. Space between the cylindrically cut hole 40 and the main tubular cylinder 46 allows for this rocking motion. The protective sleeve 42 rocks away or recoils from the strikers 62 until its movement is stopped by the cap sleeve 50 coming into contact with the stationary retaining plate 82. The retaining plate 82 acts as a hard stop to restrict unnecessary excess movement of the protective sleeves 42, and prevent the protective sleeve 42 and its contained tube 12 from ejecting themselves from the sleeve holding plate 38.
The protective sleeve 42 will rebound from the retaining plate 82 and return to its vertically oriented position. As the protective sleeve 42 rights itself vertically it will enter the impact zone of the strikers 62 again. The tube 12 contained within the protective sleeve 42 rapidly and forcefully shakes as the protective sleeve 42 is repeatedly struck by the strikers 62, causing the protective sleeve 42 to recoil then rebound from the retaining plate 82.
The strikers 62 also rebound after impacting the protective sleeve 42. Each striker 62 attached to a pendulum arm 60 pivots out of the impact zone after making contact with the protective sleeve 42. This recoiling action serves to extend the life of the internal components as well as to prevent the pendulum arms 60 from jamming, causing motor 22 seizures. As the hub 56 continues to spin the pendulum arms 60 will return to their out stretched normal position. In this outstretched position, the striker 62 will impact another protective sleeve 42 and repeat the cycle.
In this embodiment, the rotational velocity of the motor shaft 24 is controlled by applying power to the motor 22 by means of pulse width modulation, which is well known in the art. To change the rotational velocity of the motor shaft 24, the control enclosure 10 changes the duty cycle of voltage pulses applied to the motor 22. The control enclosure provides an adjusted electronic control to the motor. An increase in duty cycle will increase the rotational velocity of the motor shaft 24, while a decrease in duty cycle will decrease the rotational velocity of the motor shaft 24.
The method in which the control enclosure applies and controls the motor 22 is described in
To obtain the number of tubes in the module 36 the control enclosure 10 will begin running in sensing mode 98, shown in
Using the determined number of tubes 98c and the user's selected power level 96, the control enclosure 10 performs a mathematical calculation and selects the necessary target RPM for the strikers 62 to achieve an appropriate and consistent frequency of tube oscillations 98d, which becomes the set point for the control enclosure 10. Strikers 62 with rotational velocity matching the RPM of this set point 98d will give consistent results for each user selected power level 96.
The control enclosure 10 then enters run mode 100, shown in
During Steady State Mode 102, shown in
Description and Operation of Alternative Embodiments
The following additional embodiments are described, without limiting the scope of the invention from further variations that can be easily determined.
There could be other methods of controlling the motor speed, including, but not limited to pulse width modulation, frequency of pulses, voltage control, and/or electrical current, which are all well known in the art.
An electronic sensing circuit, possibly with an optical sensor or magnetic sensor or capacitive sensor could be used to determine the movement of the rotatable hub or the velocity of the individual strikers or the magnitude or velocity of the rebound of the strikers after they impact the tubes. Alternatively, the sensing circuit could monitor the electrical emissions or radio frequency emissions from the motor. Any number of feedback controls could compensate for the velocity of the hub or the speed of the individual strikers or the rebound characteristics of the strikers.
The base control enclosure could have a magnetic coupling in place of the mating disconnecting coupling halves 26 & 55 (shown in
The design of a control enclosure 10 which controls a detachable module lends itself to allow for multiple module configurations. Modules can be designed for various tube types and geometries. These modules could be designed to use a smaller or larger tube type having an adjusted hub height, smaller or larger strikers, and smaller or larger cylindrically cut holes. A module may be designed for many tubes to be processed at once. Modules can have varying patterns or layouts for tube locations. A module may have more cylindrically cut holes and strikers installed on its hub, relative to the shown embodiment. More strikers will be present if a higher quantity range of tubes are desired. The strikers' quantity, length, mass, shape and placement (altering the impact location) can be preset for each module optimizing their use with a particular tube geometry. These variances in the design of each module would exist to both optimize results and simplify operation for the user. The user would simply choose an appropriate module for the desired operation.
The protective sleeve can have multiple versions and geometries to accommodate different tube sizes and types. A protective sleeve may account for many, if not all, tube geometries. The defining characteristics of the protective sleeve include a casing whose walls surround and encompass a tube held within, providing protection for the tube from direct impact with the strikers and additionally have a mechanism for mounting the protective sleeve within the impact zone of the strikers, while still allowing for the necessary range of movement for said protective sleeve.
There may be additional embodiments of the tube retaining platform. For example, the tube retaining platform may have spokes or projections which extend partly or completely through the bottom opening, a ring which acts as a shelf for the tube to sit, or solid wall, all of which would be intended to prevent the tube from falling through a hole. Other variations could include one or more varieties of caps to cover the top of the tube, or additional mounting mechanisms intended to hold the sleeve in place instead of utilizing a shelf.
The threshold in 102i can be varied to adjust the faulting sensitivity from module to module or changed based on the determined number of tubes.
Another embodiment uses a sensing circuit to measure the instantaneous velocity of the strikers. The mathematical calculation for the necessary target RPM could use a look up table or a mathematical formula. The table or formula be used to compensate for the content in the tubes, thereby having the strikers impact with greater force if the content in the tube has more mass or exhibits more resistance to the impacts.
In another embodiment the removable module performs the mathematical calculation for the necessary target RPM.
Another embodiment uses a sensing circuit to measure the rotational velocity of the hub or count the rotations of the hub in a given time period, and compensate for the load in the unit. The hub could be driven at a greater speed and/or with more torque and/or more time to compensate for more tubes and/or more mass in the tubes. Additionally a user could directly select a particular rotational velocity.
Accordingly, the reader will see that at least one embodiment of the described agitation apparatus can be used to provide protection for tubes allowing for tube contents to be agitated with greater force, can lessen the risk of tube caps loosening or opening and can limit heat build-up and excess noise. In addition, at least one embodiment of the described agitation apparatus can use interchangeable modules to allow for the use of a variety of tube types, and feedback sensors to control consistency of the agitation of tube contents per user setting, and to automatically stop agitation in the case of tube failure.
While the above description contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the embodiments, but rather as providing illustrations of some of several embodiments. The scope of the embodiments should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalent, rather than by the examples given.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3677380 | Kirschey | Jul 1972 | A |
4226669 | Vilardi | Oct 1980 | A |
5242370 | Silver et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5382219 | Malekmadani | Jan 1995 | A |
5769538 | Sherman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130058187 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |