This invention relates to compact apparatus for rapidly neutralizing electrostatic charges on objects, and more particularly to apparatus and methods for producing and delivering an air stream of electrically balanced positive and negative ions.
Contemporary fabrication processes for semiconductor devices and other electronic components commonly rely upon robotics and automatic transfer mechanisms for transporting wafers or other substrates between fabrication processing stations. Such transfer mechanisms are accompanied by electrostatic charging of the wafers or substrates associated, for example, with contacting and separating from other components (triboelectric effect). Accumulated electrostatic charges attract contaminants from ambient air and can also cause damaging electrostatic discharges within microchip circuits or other fabricated electronic components. One effective protective measure is to neutralize electrostatic charges using an air stream of positive and negative ions directed to the charged object. Ideally, balanced quantities of positive and negative ions are supplied to the object to avoid charging the object on the unbalanced excessions of one polarity.
Self-balancing production of positive and negative ions requires excellent insulation from ground of the high-voltage supplies and minimum leakage of ionization currents. These requirements conventionally result in bulky apparatus having large separations between ionizing electrodes of opposite polarities, and requiring high-voltage supplies of large dimensions capable of delivering 15-20 kilovolts of air-ionizing potential.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, miniaturized apparatus including a small fan and closed-loop feedback systems control the supplies of bipolar ionizing voltages to produce balanced streams of positive and negative air ions. Audible and visual alarms are activated upon occurrence of diminished performance below established parameters. Alternatively drive signals for alarms are used to control production and flow of ions in an air stream. The miniaturized configuration of the present invention facilitates mounting on a robotic arm or manipulator to rapidly discharge a charged object from close range, commonly as part of robotic movement to transport the wafer or substrate. This promotes higher speed production aided by well-directed supplies of balanced ions for more complete, rapid discharge of a charged object. In addition, current monitoring systems respond to ion output and provide output alarm indications of ion balance and ionization efficiency, and the like. Also, closed loop control of the ionizing supplies provide stable, balanced ion production over a wide range of operating conditions. High voltages applied to ionizing electrodes and bias voltage applied to a grid electrode create and control the supplies of air ions that are delivered in close proximity to a charged object via an air stream from the miniature fan. Electrode erosion and contamination and ambient air conditions that may adversely affect ion production can be compensated by sensor circuitry that alters the voltage levels of the ionizing voltage supplies to compensate for the changed operating conditions and thereby maintain a reliable, stable rate of ion production from the positive and negative ionizing electrodes.
Referring now to the pictorial illustration of
The region 3 of ion generation includes pointed electrodes 7, 8 connected to positive and negative high voltages from supply 4. The electrodes 7, 8 intrude from opposite walls in alignment across the duct 6. These electrodes 7, 8 are well insulated from ground at a resistance of 1012 ohms, or higher to minimize leakage currents. A pair of thin, planar, conductive electrodes 9, 10 are separated by a thin layer of insulation 11 with knife edges at least facing the air flow from fan 1. These electrodes 9, 10 are disposed as a septum substantially across a diameter of the duct 6 normal to the aligned axes of the electrodes 7, 8 and aligned with the flow of air through the duct 6. In addition, grid electrode 12 is disposed across the outlet of duct 6 perpendicular to, and insulated from, the planar septum electrodes 9, 10. The grid electrode 12 is connected to receive low bias voltage from bias supply 5 for operation as later described herein. This configuration of electrodes 7-10 and grid 12 provides physical and electrical separation of the components generating positive and negative ions in the respective regions of the duct 6, all within the air stream from fan 1.
Positive and negative coronas produced by respective electrodes 7, 8 to the adjacent planar septum electrodes 9, 10 generate stable amounts of positive and negative ions in response to high voltages applied to the electrodes 7, 8. These high voltages are applied at different levels by the power supply 4 in order to generate substantially equal quantities of positive and negative ions per unit time. As is commonly known, negative ions have greater mobility and are more readily created in air than positive ions under comparable ion-generating conditions. For this reason, to generate substantially equal amounts of positive and negative ions, the voltages applied to the ionizing electrodes 7, 8 are different for similar surrounding geometries of components in the region 3 of ion generation. Typically, the voltages levels applied to the ionizing electrodes 7, 8 may be in the ratio of about 1.1-1.8, and typically about 1.3, more positive in order to generate substantially equal amounts of positive and negative ions downstream of fan 1. The high voltage supply 4 is well insulated from ground at resistance in excess of 1012 ohms to provide ‘floating’ positive and negative outputs connected to the ionizing electrodes 7, 8. Accordingly, if excessive amounts of negative ions are produced beyond balance condition, then the floating power supply will accumulate additional positive charges that bias the outputs toward producing fewer negative ions. Similar self balancing operation occurs if excessive amounts of positive ions are produced beyond balance condition.
Self balancing generation of ions, as described above, is not adequately effective to attain accurate balance of positive and negative ions below about ±50 volts of charge (or latent discharge) of a target object. The grid 12 disposed at the output of duct 6 and connected to the bias power supply 5 provides the finer balance adjustments required to attain balance within a few volts. The grid 12 is formed as a mesh of wires about 0.02″ in diameter, spaced about 0.25″ apart along orthogonal axes to allow dominant portions of generated ions to pass through in the flowing air stream from fan 1. The grid 12 thus configured and positioned controls ion balance using low bias voltages, and also screens a target object from the high electrostatic fields within the region 3. The grid 12 is positioned in close proximity to the downstream edges of the septum electrode structure 9-11, at a distance B from the ionizing electrodes 7, 8 which are spaced a distance A from the septum electrodes 9-11. The ratio A/B of the distances should be in the range of about 1.01-1.5, and preferably about 1.3 to provide ion balance adjustment with minimum voltage applied to the grid 12. The ionizing electrodes 7, 8 are also spaced a distance C from conductive elements of the fan 1 and the ratio of distances A/C should be in the range of about 1.5-2.0, and preferably about 1.8 to avoid significantly decreasing the outward flow of ions from ionizing electrodes 7, 8.
The electrodes 7, 8 are formed of thin tungsten wire of about 0.010-0.012″ diameter with chemically-etched tip radius of about 0.001″ to promote stable corona discharge at low ionizing voltage, with minimum electroerosion and resultant particulate contamination. The fan 1 and power supplies 2, 4, and 5 and the length of duct 6 are enclosed and electrically shielded by a conductive, grounded layer or coating 14 that confines electrostatic and dynamic electromagnetic fields associated with the enclosed components.
Referring now to
Referring now to the block schematic diagram of
Another sampling resistor 31 connects the bias voltage supply 5 to ground to produce a voltage thereacross indicative of an excess of positive or negative ions flowing through, and captured by, the grid 12. This voltage drop, filtered by shunt capacitor 33 is measured against a reference voltage level 35 by the low-current monitoring circuit 17 to produce a suitable alarm (e.g. drive signal to LED 37). In this manner, excess production of positive or negative ions and balance of positive and negative ions delivered at the output of the duct 6 are readily monitored.
Referring now to
Referring now to the block schematic diagram of
Referring now to
In similar manner, the low-current monitoring circuit (LCMC) 17 monitors the voltage drop across the sampling resistor 31 as an indication of the balance status of positive and negative ions flowing through the screen 12 for comparison with the reference voltage Vpb 59. In the event that the voltage across resistor 31 becomes substantially greater than the voltage (+/−) Vpb 59, the LCMC 17 produces a drive signal 58 that alters the level of bias voltage supplied to the screen 12 by the bias supply 5 in a direction to impede the flow of the excessive positive or negative ions and accelerate the flow of the deficient positive or negative ions that upset the balance of ions in the air stream.
Referring now to
In similar manner, the bias supply 5 for supplying bias voltage to the screen 12 includes an oscillator 81 that operates on applied low voltage at a nominal frequency of about 1 MHZ, as determined by the inductor 83 connected in the base circuit, and by the internal collector-to-emitter capacitance of the transistor 85. The output pulses from the oscillator 81 are supplied to a half-wave rectifier 87 to produce positive voltage, and to a voltage doubler 89 to produce negative voltage. A selected proportion of the positive and negative output voltages is selected by resistor 91 for application to the screen 12. In the event the voltage drop across sampling resistor 31 becomes significantly different than the balance reference voltage 59, the driver 57, 58 alters the voltage 93 applied to the oscillator 81 in a direction to change the bias voltage applied to the screen 12 to restore the voltage drop across sampling resistor 31 to within tolerable limits of ion balance.
Referring now to the graph of
Referring now to the graph of
Therefore, the air ionizing apparatus of the present invention generates positive and negative air ions under close controls of production levels and balance to facilitate closely-directed charge neutralization of an electrostatically charged object. Small packaging of the apparatus promotes convenient mounting on a robotic transporter of semiconductor wafers to direct a balanced stream of positive and negative air ions toward a charged wafer.
This application claims of benefit of priority from provisional application Ser. No. 60/337,418 entitled “Mini-Ionizing Fan”, filed on Nov. 30, 2001 by P. Gefter et al.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
769055 | Bumgardner | Aug 1904 | A |
2023321 | Gutman | Dec 1935 | A |
2264495 | Wilner | Dec 1941 | A |
2589613 | Hicks | Mar 1952 | A |
2723349 | Ryisky | Nov 1955 | A |
2785312 | Martin, Jr. | Mar 1957 | A |
2834898 | Partridge | May 1958 | A |
2847324 | Ogint | Aug 1958 | A |
2928941 | Hicks et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
3120626 | Schweriner | Feb 1964 | A |
3137808 | Schweriner | Jun 1964 | A |
3156847 | Schweriner | Nov 1964 | A |
3263127 | Point et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3308343 | Smith et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3335272 | Dickinson et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3337784 | Lueder | Aug 1967 | A |
3395042 | Herbert, Jr. | Jul 1968 | A |
3403252 | Nagy | Sep 1968 | A |
3417302 | Lueder | Dec 1968 | A |
3443155 | Schweriner | May 1969 | A |
3504227 | Wooton et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3582711 | Jahnke | Jun 1971 | A |
3624448 | Saurenman | Nov 1971 | A |
3654534 | Fischer | Apr 1972 | A |
3711743 | Bolasny | Jan 1973 | A |
3816799 | Ott et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3853512 | Hayashi | Dec 1974 | A |
3873835 | Ignatjev | Mar 1975 | A |
3936698 | Meyer | Feb 1976 | A |
4092543 | Levy | May 1978 | A |
4156267 | Spaulding et al. | May 1979 | A |
4188530 | Miller | Feb 1980 | A |
4194232 | Cumming et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4213167 | Cumming et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4216518 | Simons | Aug 1980 | A |
4253852 | Adams | Mar 1981 | A |
4258408 | Cantelli | Mar 1981 | A |
RE30826 | Laws | Dec 1981 | E |
4317661 | Sasaoka | Mar 1982 | A |
4319302 | Moulden | Mar 1982 | A |
4333123 | Moulden | Jun 1982 | A |
4351648 | Penney | Sep 1982 | A |
4363072 | Coggins | Dec 1982 | A |
4366525 | Baumgartner | Dec 1982 | A |
4370695 | Penick | Jan 1983 | A |
4438479 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4440553 | Helmus et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4473382 | Cheslock | Sep 1984 | A |
4496375 | Le Vantine | Jan 1985 | A |
4498116 | Saurenman | Feb 1985 | A |
4502091 | Saurenman | Feb 1985 | A |
4528612 | Spengler | Jul 1985 | A |
4536698 | Shevalenko et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4542434 | Gehlke et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4596585 | Moeller et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4630167 | Huggins | Dec 1986 | A |
4635161 | Le Vantine | Jan 1987 | A |
4642728 | Unger | Feb 1987 | A |
4682266 | Huynk et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4689715 | Halleck | Aug 1987 | A |
4729057 | Halleck | Mar 1988 | A |
4740862 | Halleck | Apr 1988 | A |
4750080 | Cumming et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4757421 | Mykkanen | Jul 1988 | A |
4757422 | Bossard et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4768126 | Le Vantine | Aug 1988 | A |
4774472 | Blitshteyn et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4805068 | Cumming et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4809127 | Steinman et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4827371 | Yost | May 1989 | A |
4864459 | Larigaldie et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872083 | Blitshteyn | Oct 1989 | A |
4901194 | Steinman et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4951172 | Steinman et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4980796 | Huggins | Dec 1990 | A |
5008594 | Swanson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5010777 | Yehl et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5017876 | Wright et al. | May 1991 | A |
5055963 | Partridge | Oct 1991 | A |
5057966 | Sakata et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5150273 | Le Vantine | Sep 1992 | A |
5153811 | Rodrigo et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5359319 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359750 | Le Vantine | Nov 1994 | A |
5422630 | Quinn et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432454 | Durkin | Jul 1995 | A |
5532902 | Beyer et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5535089 | Ford et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5612849 | Prehodka et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5707429 | Lewis | Jan 1998 | A |
5930105 | Pitel et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6002573 | Partridge | Dec 1999 | A |
6130815 | Pitel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137670 | West et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6259591 | Pitel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6674630 | Gefter et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 140 629 | Feb 1983 | CA |
2234228 | Mar 1973 | DE |
0 844 726 | May 1998 | EP |
1 540 342 | Feb 1979 | GB |
WO 9821791 | May 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60337418 | Nov 2001 | US |