Commercial aircraft may be equipped with fire suppression systems for suppressing fires in cargo compartments. A conventional aircraft fire suppression system responds to a fire alarm in two phases: a “quick knockdown” phase, followed by a suppression phase. During the quick knockdown phase, a cargo compartment is flooded with fire suppressant at a high flow rate. During the suppression phase, a lower flow rate of fire suppressant into the cargo compartment is provided over an extended period of time.
A fire suppression system adds weight to an aircraft. The added weight increases fuel costs. It would be desirable to reduce the weight of a fire suppression system.
According to an embodiment herein, an aircraft comprises a fuselage having a compartment, and a fire suppression system for delivering fire suppressant to the compartment. The system includes at least one suppressant concentration sensor located in the compartment, a valve for regulating flow of the fire suppressant to the compartment, and a controller, responsive to the sensor, for controlling the valve to maintain fire suppressant concentration within the compartment at a target concentration.
According to another embodiment herein, a fire suppression system for delivering a fire suppressant to a compartment of an aircraft comprises at least one suppressant concentration sensor located in the compartment, at least one valve for regulating flow of the fire suppressant to the compartment, and a controller, responsive to the sensor, for controlling the at least one valve to maintain fire suppressant concentration within the compartment at a target concentration.
According to another embodiment herein, a method of suppressing a fire in a cargo compartment of an aircraft comprises sensing concentration of fire suppressant in the compartment, and controlling the fire suppressant to a target concentration.
These features and functions may be achieved independently in various embodiments or may be combined in other embodiments. Further details of the embodiments can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
a and 8b are illustrations of cargo compartments with different zone coverage.
During fire suppression, the concentration of the fire suppressant in the compartment 20 may be reduced over time due to aircraft level air-flow management. Air and, therefore, suppressant can leak out of the cargo compartment. Airflow patterns, including cargo heat systems, recirculation systems and air conditioning pack flow can affect the amount of air (and thus fire suppressant) being driven out of door seals, seams in cargo liners etc.
The fire suppression system 22 further includes at least one suppressant concentration sensor 24 located in the compartment 20. The sensor 24 may be a commercially available gas sensor that draws a small amount of air into a chamber and then physically tests the air for suppressant concentration. Each sensor 24 measures the concentration of the fire suppressant in the compartment 20 and sends measurements to the controller 30. In response to the concentration measurements, the controller 30 controls the valve(s) 28 to maintain the fire suppressant concentration within the compartment 20 at a target concentration. The target concentration may be determined by regulations.
The controller 30 may be located outside the compartment 20 (e.g., in the aircraft's flight deck or electronics bay). The tanks 26 may be located just outside the compartment 20 (e.g., along a side of the fuselage 10, or at an aft end of a compartment 20). If the aircraft has multiple compartments 20, the suppression system 22 may be plumbed to all of the compartments 20.
By measuring the suppressant concentration within the compartment 20 and maintaining the suppressant at the target concentration during fire suppression, suppressant usage is optimized. Optimizing suppressant usage enables the number and/or size of the tanks 26 to be reduced. This, in turn, reduces weight of the system 22 and, consequently, reduces operating cost of the aircraft 10. Reducing the number of tanks 26 also reduces the complexity of plumbing the fire suppressant to the compartment 20 (e.g., fewer valves and less conduit are used). In addition, by optimizing the suppressant usage, the environmental impacts of a suppressant agent discharge into the atmosphere is minimized
A controller 250 is configured to adjust the position of the valve 240 to achieve a relatively high flow rate of the suppressant during a quick knockdown phase of operation and, after a predetermined time interval has elapsed, cause the valve 240 to close partially to achieve a second, lower flow rate during a suppression phase of operation. The controller 250 receives a signal from a concentration sensor 260 located in the compartment. The signal indicates a measured concentration level of the fire suppressant in the compartment. The controller 250 uses that signal to adjust the valve position to regulate the suppressant flow rate so that the measured concentration is maintained at a target concentration during both the quick knockdown and suppression phases.
During the quick knockdown phase, the concentration sensor 260 measures concentration of the fire suppressant in the compartment, and sends measurements to the controller 250. In response, the controller 250 adjusts the position of the valve 240 to achieve a flow rate that maintains the measured suppressant concentration at a target concentration (block 430).
In some embodiments, the quick knockdown phase is implemented until a predetermined time interval has elapsed (block 440). For instance, a countdown timer may be initiated by the controller 250 after the diaphragm 222 has been broken. This countdown timer may have a pre-selected interval that depends on design factors such as the volume of compartment, the volume of tank 220, the flow rate of fire suppressant into the compartment, and the nature of the cargo stored in the compartment, among other factors. In other embodiments, the quick knockdown phase may be implemented until sensed conditions (e.g., suppressant concentration) within the compartment indicate that quick knockdown is no longer needed (block 440).
At the end of the quick knockdown phase, the controller 250 commands the regulating valve 240 to a pre-selected partially closed position (block 450). This partial closure of the valve 240 begins the suppression phase of operation. Thus, a lower flow rate of fire suppressant is maintained. During the suppression phase, the concentration sensor 260 measures concentration of the suppressant in the compartment, and sends measurements to the controller 250. In response, the controller 250 adjusts the position of the valve 240 to achieve a flow rate that maintains the measured suppressant concentration at a target concentration (block 460). The suppressant concentration may be controlled until the suppression phase has been completed (block 470).
When the system 310 is activated, a controller 350 causes the valve 340 to open fully during an initial quick knockdown phase of operation and, after a predetermined time interval has elapsed, causes the valve 340 to be partially open during a suppression phase of operation. The controller 350 uses a signal from a concentration sensor 360 to adjust the valve position so that measured concentration in the compartment is maintained at a target concentration. By using a normally closed valve 340 instead of a normally open valve 240, the tank 320 need not be sealed, and a seal need not be broken.
In the examples illustrated in
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
The compartment has a plurality of zones. At least one nozzle 750 may be located within each zone. At least one concentration sensor 760 may also be located in each zone. A controller 770 receives measurements of fire suppressant concentration in each zone, and independently controls each valve 730 to maintain a target concentration in the corresponding zone.
In some embodiments, zones may be selected to cover the entire compartment. In other embodiments, zones may be selected to cover only certain areas of the compartment. The number of zones would increase with the total volume of the compartment and the complexity of the compartment geometry.
The zoned discharge of fire suppressant is advantageous for fire suppressants that are heavier than air. Such fire suppressants tend to concentrate near the compartment floor, and additionally tend to concentrate near the aft end of the compartment. Such a tendency can leave the top portion of the compartment with a relatively low concentration of fire suppressant. The zoned discharge can maintain the target concentration at the top of the compartment.
The zoned discharge is further advantageous for compartments having high leakage regions where localized concentrations may sink faster than other areas within the compartment. The zoned discharge can maintain the target concentration in those high leakage regions.
a and 8b provide examples of compartments 800 and 850 having zones A to E and F to K that cover the upper portions. In the compartment 850 of
For the compartments 800 and 850 of
In some embodiments, at least one sensor is located in each zone. In other embodiments, at least one sensor is provided only in the zone or zones having the lowest likely concentrations. Suppressant concentration tends to increase moving down and aft. Therefore, at least one concentration sensor may be located in the upper forward zone A of the compartment (e.g., zone A of compartment 800 and zone F of compartment 850).
In some embodiments, all of the zones may be controlled to the same target concentration. However, since the zones are controlled independently, different zones may be controlled to different target concentrations.
Fire suppression herein will typically be performed until the aircraft lands. However, the flow of fire suppressant doesn't have to be continuous as long as minimum concentrations are maintained.