Patent Grant
9954609
This application relates to an alarm system manufactured by the present assignees under the trade marks Interceptor and Vanguard, details of which are available from a number of prior issued patents by the Assignees including U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,681 (Murphy) issued Feb. 19, 2008 which describes a system for securing multimode fibers and U.S. Pat. No. 7,142,737 (Murphy) issued Nov. 28 2006 which describes a system for securing single mode fibers. The disclosures of each of the above patents are incorporated herein by reference.
In each of these systems, an optical signal is transmitted along a fiber and the signal received at a receiver which extracts a received signal which can have different characteristics relative to the transmitted signal due to movement of the fiber. The received signal is thus analyzed in a light signal analysis system to extract a signal indicative of any changes in characteristics of the light signal. This signal is then itself analyzed to determine whether the characteristics have changed sufficiently to indicate that a movement of the fiber indicative of an attempt to intrude into the fiber has occurred. The system further includes a control and alarm system which controls the system and an alarm in the event that an intrusion has been found.
The arrangement and location of the components can vary widely with the receiver located at the same end as the transmitter or at an opposed end. The alarm and control system can also be located at different positions in the system. Communication of data between the components can be carried out in different ways.
Many different constructions and techniques for this system are well known to persons skilled in the art and can be determined from one or more of the patents of the Assignees.
According to US Government regulations, a network carrying unencrypted classified data must be protected by a Protected Distribution System (PDS), One form of PDS is the Alarmed Carrier, which is a system by which a conveyance or carrier is alarmed by a device for detecting intrusions and attempted intrusions.
An example of an arrangement of this type is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,706,641 issued Apr. 27, 2010 by the present Applicants which describes in detail the monitoring system used in the present application, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. This patent describes that some or all of the optical fibers of a single-mode or multi-mode cable are monitored for intrusion by transmitting through the fibers a signal which can be analyzed for changes in its characteristics which are indicative of movement as a prelude to an intrusion event.
Data can be stolen from an optical fiber by removing the jacket and installing a tap device on the fiber or by other methods. Optical fiber intrusion detection systems of the type described above detect when a fiber cable is being subjected to vibration, motion, or handling that would be typical of an intrusion attempt. The system reports the intrusion attempt to the cable owner so that the cable can be inspected and the threat removed.
The fiber intrusion detection system works by transmitting a monitoring signal through a fiber loop. Disturbances on the fiber cause the monitoring signal to be modulated. At the end of the loop, the modulated signal is received, digitized and processed, and alarms are raised when an intrusion is detected.
Historically, alarmed carriers required two fibers for monitoring-classically one carrying the laser signal away from the monitoring device, and one carrying the alarm signal back, these joined at the far end (known as “looping back”).
A legacy optical network contained two optical fibers for data. Recent advances in technology have seen the introduction of the Passive Optical Network (PON). The PON is a system which delivers bidirectional communication over a single fiber by use of separation of send and receive by utilizing separate wavelengths.
A passive optical network (PON) is a point-to-multipoint, fiber to the premises network architecture in which unpowered optical splitters are used to enable a single optical fiber to serve multiple premises, typically in the range 16-128. A PON consists of a central device, generically referred to as an optical line terminal (OLT) in this document at the service provider's central office and a number of end terminals generically referred to as optical network terminals (ONTs) in this document, or known as Optical Network Units (ONUs) near the end users. A PON reduces the amount of fiber and central office equipment required compared with point-to-point architectures.
It is one object of the invention to provide an alarm system of the above type when used with a PON system.
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a method for detecting intrusion into at least one optical fiber of an optical fiber cable of an Optical Network where the network comprises:
a plurality of fibers each having a first end and a second end;
the second end of at least some of the fibers being connected to respective ones of a plurality of user end terminals;
a multiplexing system for separating a data signal output to the plurality of fibers for supply to the user end terminals;
a data transmission system at each of the user end terminals for transmitting data as an optical signal;
the method comprising:
providing a monitor system having a transmitter for a monitor signal to be applied onto at least one of the plurality of fibers, the monitor system having a monitor signal analysis system for analyzing changes in the optical monitor signal after transmission along the fiber or fibers for detecting an intrusion event;
providing at at least one of said end user terminals a monitor signal receiver system for detection and conversion of data from the analysis into a digital signal;
and transmitting the digital signal from said at least one of the user end terminals back to the monitor system using the data transmission system.
Thus this new remote sensor system can be used on a fiber carrying data multiplexed with the data or on a dark fiber, or fiber that is not yet active with data.
The arrangement herein is particularly applicable and designed for use with a PON architecture. This technique can however also be useful for standard Ethernet, single fiber video transmission, non-network, or as yet undiscovered architectures.
The fibers can be single mode or multimode fiber.
In one arrangement not just one but a plurality of and in some cases all of the ONTs of the end users include a receiver for detection and conversion to a digital signal of the monitor signal after transmission along a fiber to the ONT of the end user. In this case the receivers are generally arranged to transmit the digital signals as data to the signal processing system at a location remote from the receivers.
The terms OLT and ONT as used herein are intended to refer not to specific devices as manufactured by a specific company but generally to devices which provide the head end capability and remote end user terminals of a PON system, respectively.
This remote location can be at the OLT or the signal processing system can be located remotely from the OLT and the ONTs so that the signal control and processing system can manage multiple remote transmitters and remote receivers via a data network.
In some cases the receivers can communicate with the signal processing system using the PON data network. However, alternatively, the receivers can communicate with the signal processing system using a data network separate from the PON.
To reduce cost in some cases multiple fiber runs are secured by daisy chaining (as shown in the above patent) the runs onto a single monitoring port at one of the ONTs thus reducing the number of ports required to monitor a given number of fiber runs.
In PON deployments there will be many remote sensors for each monitoring signal transmitter. Some monitoring methods split the signal at the receiver into two or more signals that are digitized separately. To reduce total system complexity and cost, the split signals can instead be generated at the monitoring signal transmitter and then time division multiplexed (TDM) onto the fiber. The multiplexed signal can then be received by a single photo-detector/ADC at the remote sensor. Demultiplexing may take place at the remote sensor or at the control and processing system.
That is, there are multiple end point (ONT) monitoring receivers feeding back to a single photo-detector at the head end, and that these signals can be multiplexed in time so that the head end monitor receiver is not jammed with multiple concurrent signals.
The signal output can be an out of band monitor wavelength which is multiplexed or coupled into the data fiber, a portion of the data signal, such as by use of a tap coupler, an unused wavelength in WDM implementation, an injected special monitor wavelength within WDM window or a special monitor wavelength outside of data wavelengths using coupler such as, but not limited to wideband or WDM.
As set forth above, the present arrangement is particularly designed for use with a PON system. PON typically uses 1310, 1490, and 1550 windows. The system can use yet a different wavelength such as 1625 nm for monitoring.
That is the OLT transmits many wavelengths of data carrying so-called “content” (like movies on demand) which are multiplexed onto different wavelengths tightly distributed around 1550 nm. This is called DWDM, or dense wavelength division multiplexing. Separation might be less than a nm, 1550.1, 1550.9, 1551.7, etc. Thus the monitor wavelength is basically an unused wavelength within the 1550 DWDM window.
A portion of the data signal can be extracted and analyzed without WDM. The multiple wavelengths potentially enhance the sensitivity of the detection by allowing multiple states of polarization to be detected simultaneously by virtue of the multiple laser transmitters inherent in the OLT.
Optical fiber intrusion detection systems typically require a complete fiber loop for operation, however there are situations where the outgoing path is available but the return path is not. This invention solves the return path problem by receiving the monitoring signal at the remote end and returning it via a data communication network. This invention is particularly effective for securing PONs (Passive Optical Networks).
In this invention, a standard optical fiber security system used for Passive Optical Networks (PON) would utilize a system for monitoring the fiber where all equipment is on the system data transmit end. For high fiber count installations, this has the disadvantage of the inability to distinguish which branch is in alarm. This invention moves a portion to the detection to the end user location, feeds the detection signal back over the existing network, allowing a lower cost system that can distinguish which fiber is in alarm.
A fiber intrusion detection system may operate on a fiber carrying live data through the use of Wave Division Multiplexors (WDMs). The data and monitoring lasers might operate at different wavelengths, in which case the WDMs will separate the beams based on wavelength.
This configuration of Optical Fiber Intrusion Detection System monitors multiple fiber runs (as commonly found in PON) by combining the runs onto a single monitoring port. This reduces the number of ports required to monitor a given number of fiber runs.
Instead of forming a full optical loop, the receiver is placed at the far end of the monitoring fiber. The signal is digitized and returned to the control/processing unit via a data network (for example, ethernet), preferably over the protected PON itself by transmitting the monitor data by the ONT to the OLT for transmission to the monitor controller system.
To allow monitoring systems to scale to large networks, it may be beneficial to separate the monitoring signal transmitter from the control and processing system. The control and processing system can manage multiple remote transmitters and remote receivers via a data network.
A PON can be secured by deploying a Remote Sensor at each ONT, and a transmitter (remote or integrated) at the OLT. WDMs might be used to multiplex the monitoring signal onto the PON, and the PON data network serves as the Remote Receiver return path. Alternatively, the OLT transmitter can supply the monitor wavelength either separately or by virtue of the data transmission.
The advantages to this system are that no equipment needs to be added at the splitter, and that it can be rapidly retrofitted to an existing PON with no need for additional fiber deployment.
In PON deployments there will be many remote sensors for each monitoring signal transmitter. Some monitoring methods split the signal at the receiver into two or more signals that are digitized separately. To reduce total system complexity and cost, the split signals can instead be generated at the monitoring signal transmitter and then time division multiplexed (TDM) onto the fiber. The multiplexed signal can then be received by a single photodetector/ADC at the remote sensor. Demultiplexing may take place at the remote sensor or at the control and processing system.
Preferably the monitor system acts by providing at least one sensor arrangement for receiving a light signal transmitted through the fibers, detecting a series of received light signals which have been transmitted along the fibers to be monitored; comparing at least some of the received light signals relative to data obtained from previously received ones of the received light signals to detect changes in the received light signals relative to the previously received light signals; and analyzing the changes to determine any changes which are indicative of manipulation of the optical fiber causing movement of a portion thereof along the length thereof.
Preferably the monitor system acts to generate an alarm in response to the detection of any such changes which are indicative of manipulation of the optical fiber causing movement of a portion thereof along the length thereof.
Preferably the PON signal and the monitor signal are located in an armored fiber or cable so as to meet federal approval for armored cable PDS.
If external laser is used, preferably the PON signal and protection signal are multiplexed so SPON exists on a single fiber.
Preferably the multiplexing is performed by wavelength, utilizing an out of band laser for monitoring, coupled in through a coupler such as WDM.
Preferably an unused wavelength of the PON transmitter is used as the monitor source.
One embodiment of the invention will now be described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Data signals from a data source 3, such as a PON Optical Line Terminal (OLT) are supplied on an optical fiber 4. A monitor controller 1 provides control signals on a line 1A to a laser optical source 1B to generate monitor signals on a fiber 1C.
The data signal on the fiber 4 and the monitor signal on the optical connection 1C are multiplexed onto the single fiber 4 by an optical interface 5.
The system includes a junction box 20 including a 1×N optical splitter 6, which is typically, but not necessarily a 1×16 splitter, which acts to connect the monitor and data signals to multiple outputs. Each output from the splitter 6 is supplied respectively to a patch panel 8.
The output from the distribution box 20 is supplied to cables 10A, 10B for transmission to user end terminals at remote locations. Thus fiber 10 of the cable carries combined monitor and data signals to a remote location such as a user drop box or monitoring interface 16. Thus fiber 11 carries combined monitor and data signals to remote location such as a user drop box or interface 15. The cables 10 and 11 are shown as examples of a series of such cables from the separate output ports.
At each user's drop box 15, 16 is a connector 12 for delivering data to an optical network terminals (ONT) 21 which supplies a plurality of lines 22A to individual user equipment UE. The user drop boxes 15 and 16 are conventional and allow end user to access secure network with equipment such as a computer via ONT 21.
In some more complex systems there can be provided a secondary distribution box similar to the distribution box 20, also known as a “Zone Box” for further distributing the data and/or monitoring to further locations 15, 16 etc
The PON Optical Line Terminal (OLT) 3 is sending out data for the end users over fiber 4. The signals are split by splitter 6 for feeding the ultimate end users.
Additional implementations can include substituting additional layers of distribution by additional distribution boxes 20 for many more end users 15, 16. For example, patch panel 8 might feed cables to individual floors of a building. On those floors are the additional distribution boxes such as distribution boxes 20 for supplying the users in offices.
The PON transmitter 3 is connected to the lead-in fiber 4, which is preferably insensitive, leading to the distribution box 20. The PON signal and the monitor signal on the cables 10, 11 are located in an armored fiber or cable 10A so as to meet federal approval for armored cable PDS. Alternatively, the PON and monitoring fibers can be located in other approved hardened carrier conveyances such as EMT or conduit.
As described above, the PON signal and the protection signal can be the same signal, or can be separate signals that are multiplexed using WDM so that Secure PON (SPON) exists on a single fiber.
In one implementation as described above, the multiplexing is performed by wavelength and can use as the source at the alarm unit 1 an out of band laser unused wavelength of the PON transmitter for monitoring, coupled in through the WDM.
In another implementation as described above a portion of the PON data signal is used as the monitor source and analyzed for intrusion, thereby precluding the need for controller 1A, optical source 1B or interface 5.
As shown at 13, each of the ONTs of the end users includes a receiver or optical interface for the transmitted monitoring signal which acts to extract the monitor signal and to transfer it to a signal analysis and detection device 13A which acts to detect changes in the monitor signal after transmission along said respective fiber, which changes are indicative of vibration, motion, or handling of said respective fiber indicative of an attempt to intrude into said respective fiber. The device 13A can include an A/D converter for conversion of the signal to a digital signal. The receiver is arranged to transfer the digital signal through an interface 13B to the ONT along a data connector 13C for encoding as a digital data signal for transmission back along the same fiber 12. Thus the system 13A acts as an input to the ONT for data to be multiplexed with data from the user terminals and transmitted back along the fiber as data.
The optical interface comprises an inline device such as an optical coupler or WDM. Alternatively the interface can comprise or an external device such as a clip on tap-coupler for extracting a portion of the monitor or data signal for intrusion analysis.
Multiple fiber runs can be secured by daisy chaining the runs onto a single monitoring port at one of the ONTs thus reducing the number of ports required to monitor a given number of fiber runs so that only OLT or port 15D reports to the system 1.
The signal processing system in
Since various modifications can be made in my invention as herein above described, and many apparently widely different embodiments of same made within the spirit and scope of the claims without department from such spirit and scope, it is intended that all matter contained in the accompanying specification shall be interpreted as illustrative only and not in a limiting sense.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3745550 | Anthony | Jul 1973 | A |
| 4297684 | Butter | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4636029 | Johansson | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4844573 | Gillham | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4863270 | Spillman, Jr. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4931771 | Kahn | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4965856 | Swanic | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5093568 | Maycock | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5109443 | Hill | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5311592 | Udd | May 1994 | A |
| 5710648 | Frigo | Jan 1998 | A |
| 6148123 | Eslambolchi | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6630992 | Vobian | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 7092586 | Vokey | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7120324 | Murphy | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7142737 | Murphy | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7206469 | Murphy | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7280189 | Weller | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7333681 | Murphy | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7376293 | Murphy | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7403674 | Murphy | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7403675 | Murphy | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7630641 | Uhlhorn | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7634387 | Murphy | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7693359 | Murphy | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7706641 | Murphy | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7844178 | Eslambolchi | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7885543 | Chen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8094977 | Murphy | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8218966 | Gutin | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8233755 | Murphy | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8260134 | Sarashina | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8705020 | Zhuang | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8886043 | Chen | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8913887 | Hirth | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8913888 | Effenberger | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 20020097461 | Patel | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131106 | Snawerdt | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030215236 | Manifold | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040037556 | Matz | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20060002649 | Murphy | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060002650 | Vokey | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060007426 | Weller | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060029390 | Schmuck | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060067693 | Hakomori | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060092404 | Weller | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060110161 | Cho | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147211 | Kim | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153491 | Murphy | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153520 | Murphy | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060164628 | Kuo | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291795 | Murphy | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070029991 | Murphy | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070077064 | Murphy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086693 | Murphy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086694 | Murphy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070092176 | Murphy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070110247 | Murphy | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070113268 | Murphy | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116400 | Murphy | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121556 | Cho | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127923 | Dalton | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070133922 | Murphy | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070143645 | Haran | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080008417 | Gilbert | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080031151 | Williams | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20090148159 | Schofield | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090232494 | Hehmann | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090263123 | Zhu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100014072 | Bosselmann | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100054657 | Murphy | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100097234 | Eslambolchi | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100158460 | Yoon | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100196015 | Gutin | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110013904 | Khermosh | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110135307 | Conner | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241881 | Badinelli | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120039598 | Dahlfort | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120060615 | Farhadiroushan | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120076453 | Murphy | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120176606 | Zadorozhny | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20130051802 | Chen | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130188176 | Lovely | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140050471 | Bernasconi | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140091929 | Murphy | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140140689 | Dahlfort | May 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160218800 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61747898 | Dec 2012 | US | |
| 61748645 | Jan 2013 | US |
