Patent Application
20130059794
The invention relates generally to peptides derived from alpha-fetoprotein and their use to treat and/or prevent cancer, including breast cancer, glioblastoma, malignant and benign tumors in the ovaries, uterus, prostate, and thyroid. In particular, the peptides of the invention are “ring and tail” cyclic peptides that exhibit anti-estrogenic activity.
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is an embryo specific serum alpha-globulin glycoprotein that is synthesized in the fetal yolk sac and circulates through the serum of pregnant women (G.I. Abelev 1971). In the last several decades, clinical researchers have investigated the potential anti-estrogen and anti-breast cancer activities of AFP (Jacobson et al. 1990). A number of studies have since shown its effectiveness as a therapeutic agent to treat estrogen-dependent breast cancer, as well as its ability to prevent pre-malignant foci from developing into breast cancer. Specifically, these studies indicate that alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) interferes with estrogen-dependent responses, including the growth-promoting effects of estrogen on breast cancer (Bennett et al. 1998). U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,674,842 and 5,707,963 relate to a 34-amino acid peptide derived from alpha-fetoprotein that was shown to exhibit anti-estrotrophic activity. Subsequently, an 8-amino acid stretch of AFP, EMTPVNPG, (SEQ ID NO. 1), referred to as peptide P472-2, was identified as possessing anti-estrotrophic activity (Mesfin et al. 2000). Furthermore, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,818,741 and 7,122,522 describe peptides of eight to twenty amino acids, including a cyclic 9-mer (AFPep) that is useful in reducing estrogen-stimulated growth of cells. Finally, peptides as small as from 4-7 amino acids have been shown to retain anti-estrogenic activity (U.S. Pat. No. 7,598,342)
The present invention provides cyclic “ring and tail” peptides that are analogs of cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] (AFPep.) (SEQ ID NO: 33) The ring of the ring and tail analog comprises from five to nine amino acids including the sequence of the putative pharmacophore, XVNX′ (SEQ ID NO: 13), where X and X′ are independently proline or hydroxyproline. The cyclic peptides of the invention further comprise a tail portion comprising from 1-4 amino acids, where the tail portion is joined to the cyclic portion by an amide linkage to the side chain of the asparagine residue opposite the pharmacophore. In one embodiment, the cyclic ring and tail peptide of the invention has the structure shown in
Surprisingly, the peptides of the present invention retain, and in some instances, surpass the anti-estrotrophic activity of the 34-mer (P447), 8-mer (P472-2) and AFPep analog previously identified. The ring and tail peptides exhibited higher efficacy and a broader, more effective dose range.
In one aspect, therefore, the present invention relates to a cyclic peptide having a “ring and tail” structure, wherein the ring portion of said cyclic peptide contains from five to nine amino acids and comprises an amino acid sequence of AA1-AA2-N-AA3, wherein AA1 is proline, hydroxyproline or serine; AA2 is valine, isoleucine, leucine or threonine; and AA3 is proline or hydroxyproline; further, the tail portion of the ring and tail cyclic peptide is a linear peptide comprising from one to four amino acids. The ring and tail peptide of the invention has anti-estrotrophic activity.
In a related aspect, the invention relates to a cyclic peptide having a ring and tail structure, wherein the ring comprises an amino acid sequence selected from TPVN (SEQ ID NO.: 2), TOVN (SEQ ID NO.: 3), TPVNP (SEQ ID NO.: 4), TOVNP (SEQ ID NO.: 5), TPVNO (SEQ ID NO.: 6), TOVNO (SEQ ID NO.: 7), PVNPG (SEQ ID NO.: 8), OVNOG (SEQ ID NO.: 9), KTOVN (SEQ ID NO.: 11), KTOVNO (SEQ ID NO.: 36), KOTVNOG (SEQ ID NO.: 35), KTPVNPG (SEQ ID NO.: 38) and EKTOVNOGN (SEQ ID NO.: 33).
In a related aspect, the invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions comprising the anti-estrotrophic ring and tail peptides of the invention.
In another aspect, the invention relates to pharmaceutical compositions comprising one or more ring and tail peptides of the invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In one embodiment the pharmaceutical composition comprises a combination of a first ring and tail peptide having anti-estrogenic activity and a second ring and tail peptide having antagonist activity, wherein the combination of said first and second peptides has greater anti-estrogenic activity/broader dose range than said first peptide alone. The present invention, therefore, encompasses the use of the AFPep analogs of the invention for the treatment of diseases associated with estrogen-dependent growth of cells, including but not limited to breast cancer.
In a related aspect, the invention relates to a method of inhibiting the estrogen-dependent growth of cells, including breast tumor cells, using an anti-estrotrophic peptide of the invention. Accordingly, the peptide of the invention is useful in the treatment of diseases associated with estrogen-dependent growth, including breast cancer and uterine fibroids. Furthermore, the peptide of the invention may be used in conjunction with other breast cancer therapies, for example, to potentiate the efficacy of treatment with tamoxifen.
All published patent applications, patents and other references cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety into the present disclosure.
The invention provides compounds including peptides and peptidomimetics that inhibit estrogen receptor dependent cell proliferation. The compounds of the invention are, therefore, useful for treating cell proliferative disorders or physiological conditions, including breast cancer, characterized by undesirable or unwanted estrogen induced cell proliferation.
In the description that follows, certain conventions will be followed as regards the usage of terminology.
The term “peptide”, as that term is know to those of skill in the art, refers to a molecule comprising two or more amino acids, generally fewer than fifty, where the alpha-carboxylic group of one is bound to the alpha-amino group of the other. The universal one letter code known to those skilled in the art is used herein for the identification of the twenty basic amino acids. Additionally, the one letter code, “O” is used herein to designate hydroxyproline, a hydroxylated derivative of proline.
In one embodiment, the present invention encompasses cyclic analogs of cyclo [EKTOVNOGN] (AFPep) (SEQ ID NO: 33). The analogs of the present invention comprise a “ring and tail” structure, for example as shown in
In another embodiment, the invention encompasses a cyclic peptide, wherein the ring comprises the amino acid sequence, EKTOVNOGN (SEQ ID NO.: 33). Other embodiments comprise amino acid sequences in which from one to four of the amino acid residues of the ring peptide are deleted or conservatively substituted.
In other embodiments, the invention encompasses a cyclic peptide having a ring and tail structure, wherein the ring comprises an amino acid sequence selected from TPVN (SEQ ID NO.: 2), TOVN (SEQ ID NO.: 3), TPVNP (SEQ ID NO.: 4), TOVNP (SEQ ID NO.: 5), TPVNO (SEQ ID NO.: 6), TOVNO (SEQ ID NO.: 7), PVNPG (SEQ ID NO.: 8), OVNOG (SEQ ID NO.: 9), KTOVN (SEQ ID NO.: 11), KTOVNO (SEQ ID NO.: 36), KTOVNOG (SEQ ID NO.: 35), KTPVNPG (SEQ ID NO.: 38) and EKTOVNOGN (SEQ ID NO.: 33).
In still other embodiments, the invention encompasses a cyclic peptide having a ring and tail structure, wherein the ring comprises an amino acid sequence selected from TPVNN, TOVNN, TPVNPN, TOVNPN, TPVNON, TOVNON, PVNPGN, OVNOGN, KTOVNN, KTOVNON, KTOVNOGN, KTPVNPGN and EKTOVNOGN (SEQ ID NO.: 33).
The terms “mimetic”, “peptide mimetic” and “peptidomimetic” are used interchangeably, and generally refer to a peptide, partial peptide or non-peptide molecule that mimics the tertiary binding structure or activity of a selected native peptide or protein functional domain (e.g., binding motif or active site). These peptide mimetics include recombinantly or chemically modified peptides, as well as non-peptide agents such as small molecule drug mimetics, as further described below.
The terms “anti-estrotrophic activity” and “anti-estrotrogenic activity” refer to the ability of the peptides of the invention to inhibit or reduce the level of estrogen-dependent proliferation in an estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) cell population. Such activity can be measured in a variety of ways, including the immature mouse uterine growth assay as described by Bennett et al. 1998 and the human breast cancer xenograft assay as described by Bennett et al. 1998 and Jacobson et al. 1990.
The term “prevent” as that term is understood by the person of ordinary skill in the medical art (to which the present method claims are directed) is not an absolute term. In the medical art it is understood to refer to the prophylactic administration of a drug to substantially diminish the likelihood or seriousness of a condition. In the present context, the term refers to the ability of the peptides of the invention to lower incidence of palpable tumors, increase latency period and lower tumor multiplicity. The term is not intended to imply absolute protection from disease; rather it applies if there is a diminution in incidence and/or severity.
In one embodiment, the present invention relates to analogs of AFPep, that is, ring and tail peptides having a ring portion containing from five to nine amino acids comprising an amino acid sequence contained within amino acids 489-496 of human alpha-fetoprotein (Genbank accession no. AAB58754), specifically TPVNP (SEQ ID NO: 4), and analogs thereof, for example, TOVNO (SEQ ID NO: 7).
Because of their relatively small size, the peptides of the invention may be directly synthesized in solution or on a solid support in accordance with conventional peptide synthesis techniques. Various automatic synthesizers are commercially available and can be used in accordance with known protocols. The synthesis of peptides in solution phase has become a well-established procedure for large-scale production of synthetic peptides and as such is a suitable alternative method for preparing the peptides of the invention. (See for example, Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis by John Morrow Stewart and Martin et al. Application of Almez-mediated Amidation Reactions to Solution Phase Peptide Synthesis, Tetrahedron Letters Vol. 39, pages 1517-1520 1998.)
Short peptide sequences, or libraries of overlapping peptides which correspond to the selected regions described herein, can be readily synthesized and then screened in assays designed to identify reactive peptides. Alternatively, recombinant DNA technology may be employed wherein a nucleotide sequence which encodes a peptide of the invention is inserted into an expression vector, transformed or transfected into an appropriate host cell and cultivated under conditions suitable for expression. Methods for production of a peptide by recombinant DNA technology are well known to those of skill in the art.
cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] (AFPep) (SEQ ID NO.: 1), a cyclic peptide derived from the active site of alpha-fetoprotein, has been shown to inhibit the growth of breast cancer. AFPep is comprised of 9 amino acids in head-to-tail peptide linkage. It was previously shown that linear analogs less than eight amino acids retained biological activity. Also, previous studies had suggested that aromaticity/hydrophobicity outside the ring (i.e. in the side chains) might enhance the biological activity of AFPep. Therefore, two hypotheses were tested: 1) Analogs with a smaller ring size than AFPep will have higher efficacy than AFPep and 2) an aromatic/hydrophobic amino acid residue (s) (i.e. a “tail”) outside the ring will enhance dose-response properties. AFPep analogs were assembled on PAL-PEG-PS resin beginning with the C-terminus using N-terminally protected amino acids. Cyclic analogs were cyclized by formation of a peptide bond between the N-terminal residue and C-terminal residue in each amino acid sequence. Ring and tail peptide synthesis was carried out by adding one or more hydrophobic amino acids (Phe, Ile) to the optimal ring size to create a hydrophobic “tail,” or by adding a hydrophilic amino acid (Lys, Glu, or Tyr) to create a hydrophilic “tail”.
When cyclic peptides of various ring sizes were evaluated for antiestrogenic or anticancer activity, the 9-amino acid ring peptide (AFPep) was found to be the most effective. When a ‘tail’ was added, analogs with hydrophilic “tails” were found to have very weak biological activity, whereas analogs with hydrophobic “tails” significantly inhibited E2-stimulated cancer cell growth in vivo and in vitro. cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI was the most effective analog in inhibition of E2-stimulated growth. It was significantly better than AFPep in inhibition of cancer cell growth and in its dose response profile. This new “ring and tail” design has produced a better anticancer agent than AFPep and this design could be adapted to evaluate receptor specificity.
A region of AFP was found to have anti-cancer properties (25, 200). An 8-mer linear peptide was synthesized corresponding to this region and it retained the anti-cancer properties (25, 286). However, its dose-response curve was biphasic portending a narrow dose range. In response to these observations a cyclic peptide (AFPep) was designed and synthesized (26) and yielded a wider biphasic dose-response curve when evaluated in the uterine growth inhibition assay (
Therefore, before those analogs were developed, it was important to assess the smallest cyclic peptide that would be effective in inhibition of E2-stimulated growth in vitro and in vivo. Recent results showed that analogs of AFPep less than 8 amino acid retained biological activity. It would be advantageous to invent active peptides with ring sizes smaller than 9 amino acids in order to accommodate the additional amino acid tails. DeFreest et al. had identified the pharmacophore region of AFPep, and suggested that it consists of only 4 amino acids (OVNO), and reasoned that the other amino acids were needed to lock AFPep in the right conformation. We surmised that cyclization of smaller analogs of AFPep would retain the pharmacophore, and therefore efficacy. Therefore, we evaluated the activity of cyclic peptides containing OVNO, but with as few additional amino acids as possible. An additional residue, Asp (OAll), is needed to close the ring of cyclic peptides, so we made cyclic peptides of 5 or more amino acids. Although 5 amino acids is a small ring size, synthesis of cyclic 5-amino acid rings has been achieved previously. Thus, we synthesized cyclic peptides of reducing ring size (from 9 amino acids to 5 amino acids ring size) to determine the smallest possible cyclic analog that would have antiestrogenic and anticancer activity equal or superior to AFPep.
During removal of the peptide from the resin (cleavage), there are three possible points at which cleavage can occur. When cleavage occurs at position 1 (normal cleavage), it results in the synthesis of AFPep with a MW=970 g/mol, which leads to the dose response curve shown in
It was hypothesized that the putative linker group was responsible for the wider dose range (
We used amino acids as opposed to chemical moieties to mimic the putative linker group because 1) amino acids are non-toxic 2) their side chains have different properties (changing from one amino acid to the next can readily change the structural feature of the ‘tail’) 3) they can be incorporated into the peptide sequence using the same synthetic technique for the synthesis of AFPep.
The strategy involved incorporating aspartate-allyl (Asp-OAl) directly onto the tail forming amino acids. The remainder to the sequence elongation was achieved by following standard Fmoc peptide synthesis described in material and methods. The ring is formed when the last amino acid that was added to the sequence forms a peptide bond with N, which allows the amino acids attached to the side chain of N to branch out as a tail. This led to the naming of this cyclic-tail peptide as ‘ring and tail’ peptide.
A number of studies have used this technique to synthesize peptides (called tailed cyclic peptide) to study cell adhesion. One of these studies gave a detail description of the design and synthesis of a five-member cyclic peptide ring bearing a six-carbon spacer arm fixed on the side chain of the peptide and ended with an anchoring cysteine at the C-terminal end of the arm. Delforge showed that endothelial cell adhesion was strongly promoted on bovine serum albumin modified with a RGD ‘ring and tail’ peptide. While our synthesis strategy is similar to the one used above, there are several differences. These studies used other moieties with amino acids to create the ‘tail’ of their peptides whereas we used only amino acids. Fmoc-Glu-OAl was used by Delforge et al. as the cyclizing amino acid whereas we used Fmoc-Asp-OAl. The major difference was that those studies focused on the utility of the ‘ring and tail’ peptides as adhesion molecules. In this study we are trying to improve the structure-activity relationship of AFPep. This may lead to a higher and a broader, more effective dose range.
The significance of this work is that if a ‘ring and tail’ peptide was to be developed that exhibits greater efficacy and a broader, more effective dose profile than AFPep in the inhibition of E2-dependent growth of immature mouse uterus and T47D human ER+ breast cancer cells then this result could provide valuable tools for elucidating the target molecules of peptides which could aid in understanding the mode of action of AFP-derived peptides and could have obvious important clinical implications.
Cyclic analogs of AFPep with reduced ring sizes (8 to 5 amino acids) were designed and synthesized (Table 1). The strategy was to maintain the putative pharmacophore of AFPep and the cyclizing amino acid residue, N, while eliminating amino acid residues that were not required for biological activity to obtain the optimal ring size. As shown in Table 1, 9-amino acid ring is AFPep; the 8-ring acid ring is missing residue E from AFPep; the 7-amino acids ring is missing residue E and G from AFPep; the 6-amino acid ring is missing residues E, K and G from AFPep; and the 5-amino acid ring is missing residues E, K, O, and G from AFPep.
Four cyclic peptides of decreasing ring size (Table 1) were synthesized and were assessed for antiestrogenic activity using the immature mouse uterine assay. Negative control mice received saline alone. Positive control mice received E2 alone. AFPep was used as a positive control peptide and cyclic Scr was used as a peptide control. Mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with each of these peptides at a dose of 1 μg/mouse. One hour later mice received 0.5 ug 17β-estradiol (E2) i.p. Twenty-two hours later uteri were dissected, weighed, and normalized to body weight. The results are reported as mean±S.E (n=5) for four independent experiments.
Anticancer activity of the cyclic peptides was also evaluated using the T47D cell proliferation assay. T47D cells were cultured on collagen-IV coated 24-well plates and treated with each of above peptides in the presence of E2. Final peptide concentrations of each peptide were 10−6 M and final E2 concentration was 1 nM. Values are reported as mean±SEM (n=6) of four independent experiments. AFPep was shown to be significantly different from the other analogs. However, the other ring sizes were not significantly different from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. p≦0.05
All of the cyclic analogs (except the negative control) exhibited antiestrogenic (
In order to broaden the effective dose profile of cyclic AFPep peptide, nine analogs containing the 9-member ring and amino acid tails were designed and synthesized (Table 2). The amino acid composition of the ‘tail’ was varied to assess the role of hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity, aromaticity or aliphaticity of the analogs. An analog will be considered hydrophobic when the tail residue(s) contain side chain(s) with an aromatic group or an aliphatic group or both (for example F, I, or FI). An analog will be considered hydrophilic if its side chain contains any polar or charged moieties (for example, Y, E, K, S, or YI, FS). The length of the ‘tail’ was varied by using 1 or 2 amino acids.
We evaluated the effects that different tail residues would have on the antiestrogenic and anticancer activities of these ring and tail analogs. When these analogs were assessed for the ability to inhibit E2-stimulated uterine growth and T47D human breast cancer cell growth, the hydrophobic analogs showed significant inhibition of growth, whereas the hydrophilic analogs exhibited insignificant inhibition (Table 3). Furthermore, cyclo [EKTOVNOGN] FI was more effective at inhibiting E2-stimulated growth than AFPep (Table 3).
A ‘tail’ was attached to a nine-amino acid ring and included 1 or 2 amino acids defined as hydrophilic or hydrophobic based on the nature of their side-chains. Tails comprising the following amino acid(s): serine (S), tyrosine (Y), lysine (L), glutamic acid (E), phenylalanine-serine (FS) and tyrosine-isoleucine (YI) represent hydrophilic tails and tails comprising the following amino acid(s), phenylalanine (F), isoleucine (I) and phenylalanine-isoleucine (FI) are hydrophobic tails. All peptides were administered at a dose of 1 μg/mouse intraperitoneally or 10 μg/mouse by oral gavage. Values are presented as mean±S.E. (n=5). In culture, T47D cells were treated with each peptide at a concentration of 1 μM. Values are presented as mean±S.E (n=6). Peptides with an inhibition of more than 25% significantly inhibited E2-stimulated growth. *p<0.05 as compared to the group stimulated with E2 alone. Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test.
The results (shown in
Together with cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] YI, and AFPep, we assessed the anticancer activity of cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI at different concentrations in vitro (
To determine the effectiveness of cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI as a potential cancer therapeutic agent in a clinically relevant model, we assessed the effect of cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI on E2-supplemented MCF-7 human breast cancer xenograft growth using different routes of administration. Briefly, a piece of MCF-7 human breast cancer measuring approximately 2 mm in average diameter was implanted under the kidney capsule of SCID mice. Mice were supplemented with E2 pellets implanted subcutaneously, at the time of tumor implantation, for a steady state of E2 at 10−9 M. Mice were treated with 10 μg subcutaneously (s.c.), 10 μg intraperitoneally (i.p.) or 100 μg orally (p.o.) cyclo [EKTOVNOGN] FI was administered once daily from day 1 to day 20 of the experiment. Tumor size was measured as described in materials and methods. Data is presented as mean S.E (n=5). After 20 days of treatment, the percentage change in tumor volume for each cyclo [EKTOVNOGN] FI treated group was significantly different from the E2 alone group. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. *p<0.01 vs. E2.
The anticancer activity of ‘ring and tail’ analogs was evaluated above in ER+ human breast cancer cells. The hydrophobic tail on AFPep enhanced its efficacy and dose response profile as antiestrogenic and anticancer agent. The next step was to determine whether cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI would exhibit anticancer activity in ER− cells.
Estrogen independent (ER−)MDA MB231 cells were plated at 20,000 cells/well/ml in a collagen-IV coated 24-well plate. The next day, cells were treated with vehicle (0.1% ethanol), AFPep, cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] YI, for 7 days. Each peptide was treated at 10−6 M. Cell proliferation was determined by MTT assay. Each value is the mean±S.E. (n=4) of three independent experiments.
All peptides were administered at a dose of 1 μg/mouse intraperitoneally or 10 μg/mouse by oral gavage. Values are presented as mean±S.E (n=5). In culture, T47D cells were treated with each peptide at a concentration of 1 μM. Values are presented as mean±S.E (n=6). Peptides with an inhibition of more than 25% significantly inhibited E2-stimulated growth. *p<0.05 as compared to the group stimulated with E2 alone. Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test.
A strategy of for the synthesis of ring and tail peptides was developed in an effort to enhance the dose range of AFPep. In this strategy, amino acids forming the tail were first added onto the resin, and Fmoc-AspOAl was placed strategically in the peptide chain to form the ring. The number of amino acids preceding Fmoc-AspOAl, in the peptide chain, determined the length of the ‘tail’. This gave the flexibility of developing peptides with ‘tails’ of any length for possible maximum interaction with its target molecule. However, it was not necessary to go beyond a tail length of 2 amino acids. The property of the amino acids side chains making up the ‘tail’ determined whether the ‘ring and tail’ peptides are considered hydrophobic or hydrophilic. This gave many options in the design of ‘tails’ for putative different efficacies/specificities. In order to assess the effects of the length and characteristics of the tail, we maintained the tail on the N residue distal to the pharmacophore of AFPep. Using amino acids in the ‘tail’ allowed us to maintain the integrity of the peptides (i.e. producing analogs without any known toxicity).
We have shown that the optimal ‘ring and tail’ analog (cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI) has greater efficacy and broader, more effective dose ranges than AFPep against E2-stimulated immature mouse uterine growth and ER+ human breast cancer cell growth. Furthermore, cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI has significantly greater efficacy than AFPep at higher doses. At higher doses AFPep loses activity whereas cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI maintained biological activity. The superiority of the dose-response profile cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI over the dose response profile of AFPep increases its attractiveness as the lead peptide. It is important to note that cyclo [EKTOVNOGN] FI showed significant inhibition of MCF-7 ER+ human breast cancer xenografts by many routes of administration (subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, or oral gavage). This suggests that cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI is a potential therapeutic agent for the breast cancer.
In the design of ‘ring and tail’ peptides, hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of the ‘tail’ was a critical part of the design. Aromaticity/hydrophobicity of the ‘tail’ may play a role in enhancing the dose profile of AFPep. This project showed (
In specific aim 2, it was hypothesized that ‘ring and tail’ analogs will have greater efficacy and broader, more effective dose response than AFPep. It has been shown that cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI exhibits these properties in the inhibition of E2-stimulated mouse uterine growth and T47D cell proliferation. Therefore, the hypothesis cannot be rejected.
In summary, we have used a novel strategy to synthesize ‘ring and tail’ peptides containing amino acid tails of different characteristics. We have shown that the 9-peptide ring and tail analog has greater efficacy and a broader, more effective dose range than AFPep. Although the MW of AFPep has increased, the peptidic concepts have been maintained by incorporating only amino acids into the peptide chain. In so doing, we maintained the integrity of cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI as a non-toxic drug candidate and created an analog that is superior to AFPep in terms of efficacy and dose response profile. Therefore, cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI is a very promising candidate as an anticancer drug. Furthermore, this synthesis strategy can be used as a tool to synthesize a library of ‘ring and tail’ analogs that may be used in biological experiments to elucidate the molecular mechanism of AFP-derived peptides.
‘Ring and tail’ analogs were then used to elucidate the mechanism of action of AFPep. As discussed above, a hydrophobic ‘tail’ on AFPep enhances efficacy and broadens the effective dose range whereas a hydrophilic ‘tail’ decreases the efficacy and dose range of AFPep. Based on the observation that AFPep has a biphasic dose-response curve, a model (
To test this model, a ‘ring and tail’ peptide was designed by making a simple amino acid substitution in the pharmacophore of the ‘ring and tail’ hydrophilic peptide. When this analog binds to the low affinity receptor there is little or no response. This analog was evaluated in the uterine growth inhibition assay. In the presence of this analog, AFPep binds only to the high affinity receptor and exhibits a sigmoidal dose range curve.
A concerted effort has been made by our laboratory and others to elucidate the mechanism of action of AFPep. However, there is limited knowledge of the receptor (s) and mode of action of the antiestrogenic effect. What is known is that AFPep does not bind to the E2-binding site of the estrogen receptor (21), indicating its antiestrogenic mode of action is completely different from that of tamoxifen. AFPep significantly inhibited the E2-induced estrogen receptor phosphorylation at serine-118 (22), and significantly increased serine-15 phosphorylation on p53 (23). AFPep increases nuclear p21Cip1 activation (202), which may suggest that it is acting through p21Cip1 to inhibit the proliferation of ER+ human breast cancer cells. Subsequently, AFPep has been shown to prevent the transactivation of c-erb2 leading dephosphorylated ERK1/2 after stimulation by E2 or EGF in MCF-7 cells (285). It has been shown that phosphorylated ERK is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation (294) and it has been postulated that p21Cip1 and cyclin regulation of the cell cycle may be controlled by ERK (295). Therefore, it would be useful to investigate the link between Ras/ERK pathway and cell cycle regulators such as the cyclins, p21Cip1, and p53 to determine the cellular and molecular mechanism of AFP-derived peptides in the inhibition of E2-stimulated growth of breast cancer cells.
In order to introduce the lead peptide to clinical trials, information about its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is required. Pharmacokinetics is the study of the effect of the body on drug level over time. It has been shown that our lead peptide candidates are active after oral administration. This brings to prominence the need for bioavailability, distribution, metabolism, and excretion studies to ascertain what quantities of peptide would need to be given by oral route. To study this, radiolabeled peptide could be given to whole animals at various doses by oral gavage, or by intravenous injection via tail vein. Aliquots of blood will be collected, at multiple time points thereafter. The blood concentration data will be plotted against time to generate the maximum plasma concentration, the maximum time to reach maximum concentration, and the half-life of the peptide from the pharmacokinetic profile. The area under the concentration-time curve will be calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule from kinetic data that will be collected from individual values. The relative oral bioavailability will be calculated from the dose-corrected area under the curve from the oral versus intravenous administrations. The extent to which the peptide remains intact will be assessed by use of a simple reverse phase purification step that cleanly separates intact lead peptide from metabolites. It will also be important to administer the labeled peptide to tumor bearing animals and assess the extent to which the peptide is found within the tumors. At various times after bolus iv administration of lead peptide, animals will be sacrificed and subject to necropsy; major organs, tumors, and blood will be collected and measured for radiolabeled peptide.
Pharmacodynamics is the effect the drug has on the body. Information about the efficacy, potency, and affinity of the lead peptide will be needed before it is brought to clinical trials. The laboratory has demonstrated efficacy in therapeutic use for AFPep, TOVNOGNEK, and cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI. Efficacy for AFPep in cancer prevention has also been documented. Prevention studies have not been done with TOVNOGNEK and cyclo[EKTOVNOGN] FI. When in vivo therapeutic and prevention studies are performed using these analogs, dose/concentration-response curves should be developed and IC50s calculated for the analogs of AFPep to determine how the potency of these analogs compares to that of AFPep. At present, the receptor (s) for AFPep-derived peptides is unknown. Thus it would be difficult to perform binding studies to determine the affinity of these peptides for the receptor (s). What has been established is that these peptides work on ER+ cells. Therefore, it would be interesting to see if these analogs accumulate in ER+ cells and not in ER− cells and to measure cellular uptake and retention of these peptides. Competition studies could be performed using analogs of AFPep that are known to be biologically inactive.
In this research project two approaches were employed to develop analogs of AFPep that are highly effective in the inhibition of E2-stimulated growth. The first approach developed small analogs of AFPep. The concept was that smaller analogs would be more drug-like than AFPep and therefore they would have higher efficacies. A number of these analogs inhibited E2-stimulated growth in vivo and in vitro. Our results showed smaller analogs did not have higher efficacy than AFPep, even though they conformed better than AFPep to Lipinski's RO5. There was a 5-mer peptide (TOVNO) that had similar efficacy to AFPep, but its dose response profiles in the inhibition of E2-stimulated mouse uterine growth and T47D human ER+ breast cancer cell growth were undesirable. This analog is drug-like and could be a good anticancer agent. However, the goal was to develop analogs that are superior to AFPep and TOVNO is not.
A linear 9-mer peptide (TOVNOGNEK) was developed and interestingly it has efficacy equivalent to AFPep in the inhibition of MCF-7 ER+ human breast cancer xenografts in mice, and a superior dose response profile as an antiestrogenic and anticancer agent. It is postulated that this analog is a metabolite of AFPep. TOVNOGNEK contains the same types and number of amino acids as AFPep. It is MW=986 g/mol whereas the MW of AFPep is 970 g/mol, so it is not smaller than AFPep. TOVNOGNEK does not conform to Lipinski's RO5, but it does effectively inhibit E2-stimulated growth. In addition, it is linear and therefore easier to synthesize than AFPep.
The second approach was to develop ‘ring and tail’ analogs that would be highly effective and have enhanced dose response profiles as antiestrogenic and anticancer agent. This strategy used rational drug design to synthesize AFPep bearing hydrophobic or hydrophilic amino acid ‘tails’. These analogs had higher MW than AFPep, which is divergent from work done in section III. However, the high MW of the ‘ring and tail’ analogs did not affect the hydrophobic-tail analogs effectiveness as antiestrogenic and anticancer agents. The result suggests that hydrophobicity in the ‘tail’ region enhances efficacy as well as dose response profile. It has been shown that the optimal ‘ring and tail’ (cyclo [EKTOVNONGN] FI) is superior to AFPep.
An interesting concept in the development of analogs of AFPep, for increased efficacy and enhanced dose response, was that analogs smaller than 9 amino acids should be more drug-like than AFPep. We showed that linear analogs as small as 5 amino acids had similar efficacies to AFPep. However, the cyclic analogs of the same number and types of amino acids as those linear analogs had significantly lower efficacies than AFPep. We postulate that the optimal ring size for maximal inhibitory activity is 9 amino acids. The cyclization of smaller analogs distorts the active conformation leading to decreased biological activity.
In addition to the peptide compounds described herein; the invention also contemplates that other sterically similar compounds may be formulated to mimic the key portions of the peptide structure and that such compounds may also be used in the same manner as the peptides of the invention. This may be achieved by techniques of molecular modeling and chemical design known to those of skill in the art.
In one embodiment, for example, the peptides of the invention are modified to produce peptide mimetics by replacement of one or more naturally occurring side chains of the 20 genetically encoded amino acids (or D amino acids) with other side chains, for instance with groups such as alkyl, lower alkyl, cyclic 4-, 5-, 6-, to 7-membered alkyl, amide, amide lower alkyl, amide di(lower alkyl), lower alkoxy, hydroxy, carboxy and the lower ester derivatives thereof, and with 4-, 5-, 6-, to 7-membered heterocyclics. For example, proline analogs can be made in which the ring size of the proline residue is changed from 5 members to 4, 6, or 7 members. Cyclic groups can be saturated or unsaturated, and if unsaturated, can be aromatic or non-aromatic. Heterocyclic groups can contain one or more nitrogen, oxygen, and/or sulphur heteroatoms. Examples of such groups include the furazanyl, furyl, imidazolidinyl, imidazolyl, imidazolinyl, isothiazolyl, isoxazolyl, morpholinyl (e.g. morpholino), oxazolyl, piperazinyl (e.g. 1-piperazinyl), piperidyl (e.g. 1-piperidyl, piperidino), pyranyl, pyrazinyl, pyrazolidinyl, pyrazolinyl, pyrazolyl, pyridazinyl, pyridyl, pyrimidinyl, pyrrolidinyl (e.g. 1-pyrrolidinyl), pyrrolinyl, pyrrolyl, thiadiazolyl, thiazolyl, thienyl, thiomorpholinyl (e.g. thiomorpholino), and triazolyl. These heterocyclic groups can be substituted or unsubstituted. Where a group is substituted, the substituent can be alkyl, alkoxy, halogen, oxygen, or substituted or unsubstituted phenyl. Peptidomimetics may also have amino acid residues that have been chemically modified by phosphorylation, sulfonation, biotinylation, or the addition or removal of other moieties.
A variety of techniques are available for constructing peptide mimetics with the same or similar desired biological activity as the corresponding native but with more favorable activity than the peptide with respect to solubility, stability, and/or susceptibility to hydrolysis or proteolysis (see, e.g., Morgan & Gainor, Ann. Rep. Med. Chem. 24, 243-252, 1989). Certain peptidomimetic compounds are based upon the amino acid sequence of the peptides of the invention. Often, peptidomimetic compounds are synthetic compounds having a three-dimensional structure (i.e. a “peptide motif”) based upon the three-dimensional structure of a selected peptide. The peptide motif provides the peptidomimetic compound with the desired biological activity, i.e., binding to IAP, wherein the binding activity of the mimetic compound is not substantially reduced, and is often the same as or greater than the activity of the native peptide on which the mimetic is modeled. Peptidomimetic compounds can have additional characteristics that enhance their therapeutic application, such as increased cell permeability, greater affinity and/or avidity and prolonged biological half-life.
Peptidomimetic design strategies are readily available in the art (see, e.g., Ripka & Rich, Curr. Op. Chem. Biol. 2, 441-452, 1998; Hruby et al., Curr. Op. Chem. Biol. 1, 114-119, 1997; Hruby & Balse, Curr. Med. Chem. 9, 945-970, 2000). One class of peptidomimetics comprises a backbone that is partially or completely non-peptide, but mimics the peptide backbone atom for atom and comprises side groups that likewise mimic the functionality of the side groups of the native amino acid residues. Several types of chemical bonds, e.g. ester, thioester, thioamide, retroamide, reduced carbonyl, dimethylene and ketomethylene bonds, are known in the art to be generally useful substitutes for peptide bonds in the construction of protease-resistant peptidomimetics. Another class of peptidomimetics comprises a small non-peptide molecule that binds to another peptide or protein, but which is not necessarily a structural mimetic of the native peptide. Yet another class of peptidomimetics has arisen from combinatorial chemistry and the generation of massive chemical libraries. These generally comprise novel templates which, though structurally unrelated to the native peptide, possess necessary functional groups positioned on a nonpeptide scaffold to serve as “topographical” mimetics of the original peptide (Ripka & Rich, 1998, supra).
The peptides of the invention are useful in a method of reducing estrogen-stimulated growth of cells by contacting the cells with the peptide. Accordingly, the compounds of the invention can be administered alone or as a pharmaceutical composition, systemically, regionally (e.g., directed towards an organ or tissue), or locally (e.g., directly into a tumor mass), in accordance with any protocol or route that achieves the desired effect. The compounds and pharmaceutical compositions can be administered as a single or multiple dose each day (e.g., at a low dose), or intermittently (e.g., every other day, once a week, etc. at a higher dose). The compounds and pharmaceutical compositions can be administered via inhalation (e.g., intra-tracheal), orally, intravenously, intraarterially, intravascularly, intrathecally, intraperitonealy, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, intracavity, transdermally (e.g., topical), transmucosally (e.g., buccal, bladder, vaginal, uterine, rectal, or nasal), by multiple administrations, sustained release (e.g., gradual perfusion over time) or a single bolus. Implantable devices, including microfabricated devices, for administering drugs are well known and are also applicable for delivering compounds of the invention to a subject.
As used herein the term “pharmaceutically acceptable” and “physiologically acceptable” includes solvents (aqueous or non-aqueous), solutions, emulsions, dispersion media, coatings, isotonic and absorption promoting or delaying agents, compatible with pharmaceutical administration. A “pharmaceutical composition” or “pharmaceutical formulation” therefore refers to a composition suitable for pharmaceutical use in a subject. The pharmaceutical compositions and formulations include a therapeutically effective amount of the compound of the invention, for example, an effective amount of a peptide or peptidomimetic, and a pharmaceutically or physiologically acceptable carrier.
As will be known to the skilled artisan, pharmaceutical compositions can be formulated to be compatible with a particular route of administration, systemic or local. Thus, pharmaceutical compositions include carriers, diluents, or excipients suitable for administration by various routes.
Formulations for enteral (oral) administration can be contained in a tablet (coated or uncoated), capsule (hard or soft), microsphere, emulsion, powder, granule, crystal, suspension, syrup or elixir. Conventional nontoxic solid carriers which include, for example, pharmaceutical grades of mannitol, lactose, starch, magnesium stearate, sodium saccharin, talcum, cellulose, glucose, sucrose, magnesium carbonate, can be used to prepare solid formulations. Supplementary active compounds (e.g., preservatives, antibacterial, antiviral and antifungal agents) can alsobe incorporated into the formulations. A liquid formulation can also be used for enteral administration. The carrier can be selected from various oils including petroleum, animal, vegetable or synthetic, for example, peanut oil, soybean oil, mineral oil, sesame oil. Suitable pharmaceutical excipients include e.g., starch, cellulose, talc, glucose, lactose, sucrose, gelatin, malt, rice, flour, chalk, silica gel, magnesium stearate, sodium stearate, glycerol monostearate, sodium chloride, dried skim milk, glycerol, propylene glycol, water, ethanol.
Pharmaceutical compositions for enteral, parenteral, or transmucosal delivery include, for example, water, saline, phosphate buffered saline, Hank's solution, Ringer's solution, dextrose/saline, and glucose solutions. The formulations can contain auxiliary substances to approximate physiological conditions, such as buffering agents, tonicity adjusting agents, wetting agents, detergents and the like. Additives can also include additional active ingredients such as bactericidal agents, or stabilizers. For example, the solution can contain sodium acetate, sodium lactate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, sorbitan monolaurate or triethanolamine oleate. Additional parenteral formulations and methods are described in Bai (1997) J. Neuroimmunol. 80:65-75; Warren (1997) J. Neurol. Sci. 152:31-38; and Tonegawa (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186:507-515. The parenteral preparation can be enclosed in ampules, disposable syringes or multiple dose vials made of glass or plastic.
Pharmaceutical compositions for intradermal or subcutaneous administration can include a sterile diluent, such as water, saline solution, fixed oils, polyethylene glycols, glycerine, propylene glycol or other synthetic solvents; antibacterial agents such as benzyl alcohol or methyl parabens; antioxidants such as ascorbic acid, glutathione or sodium bisulfite; chelating agents such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; buffers such as acetates, citrates or phosphates and agents for the adjustment of tonicity such as sodium chloride or dextrose.
Pharmaceutical compositions for injection include aqueous solutions (where water soluble) or dispersions and sterile powders for the extemporaneous preparation of sterile injectable solutions or dispersion. For intravenous administration, suitable carriers include physiological saline, bacteriostatic water, Cremophor EL™ (BASF, Parsippany, N.J.) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The carrier can be a solvent or dispersion medium containing, for example, water, ethanol, polyol (for example, glycerol, propylene glycol, and liquid polyetheylene glycol, and the like), and suitable mixtures thereof. Fluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of a coating such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersion and by the use of surfactants. Antibacterial and antifungal agents include, for example, parabens, chlorobutanol, phenol, ascorbic acid and thimerosal. Isotonic agents, for example, sugars, polyalcohols such as manitol, sorbitol, sodium chloride may be included in the composition. The resulting solutions can be packaged for use as is, or lyophilized, the lyophilized preparation can later be combined with a sterile solution prior to administration.
Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers can contain a compound that stabilizes, increases or delays absorption or clearance. Such compounds include, for example, carbohydrates, such as glucose, sucrose, or dextrans; low molecular weight proteins; compositions that reduce the clearance or hydrolysis of peptides; or excipients or other stabilizers and/or buffers. Agents that delay absorption include, for example, aluminum monostearate and gelatin. Detergents can also be used to stabilize or to increase or decrease the absorption of the pharmaceutical composition, including liposomal carriers. To protect from digestion the compound can be complexed with a composition to render it resistant to acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis, or the compound can be complexed in an appropriately resistant carrier such as a liposome. Means of protecting compounds from digestion are known in the art (see, e.g., Fix (1996) Pharm Res. 13:1760-1764; Samanen (1996) J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 48:119-135; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,391,377, describing lipid compositions for oral delivery of therapeutic agents).
For transmucosal or transdermal administration, penetrants appropriate to the barrier to be permeated are used in the formulation. Such penetrants are generally known in the art, and include, for example, for transmucosal administration, detergents, bile salts, and fusidic acid derivatives. Transmucosal administration can be through nasal sprays or suppositories (see, e.g., Sayani (1996) “Systemic delivery of peptides and proteins across absorptive mucosae” Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 13:85-184). For transdermal administration, the active compound can be formulated into ointments, salves, gels, or creams as generally known in the art. Transdermal delivery systems can also be achieved using patches.
For inhalation delivery, the pharmaceutical formulation can be administered in the form of an aerosol or mist. For aerosol administration, the formulation can be supplied in finely divided form along with a surfactant and propellant. In another embodiment, the device for delivering the formulation to respiratory tissue is in which the formulation vaporizes. Other delivery systems known in the art include dry powder aerosols, liquid delivery systems, inhalers, air jet nebulizers and propellant systems (see, e.g., Patton (1998) Biotechniques 16:141-143; Dura Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, Calif.; Aradigm, Hayward, Calif.; Aerogen, Santa Clara, Calif.; and Inhale Therapeutic Systems, San Carlos, Calif.).
Biodegradable, biocompatable polymers can be used, such as ethylene vinyl acetate, polyanhydrides, polyglycolic acid, collagen, polyorthoesters, and polylactic acid. Methods for preparation of such formulations are known to those skilled in the art. The materials can also be obtained commercially from Alza Corporation and Nova Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Liposomal suspensions (including liposomes targeted to cells or tissues using antibodies or viral coat proteins) can also be used as pharmaceutically acceptable carriers. These can be prepared according to methods known in the art, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,235,871; 4,501,728; 4,522,811; 4,837,028; 6,110,490; 6,096,716; 5,283,185; 5,279,833; Akimaru (1995) Cytokines Mol. Ther. 1:197-210; Alving (1995) Immunol. Rev. 145:5-31; and Szoka (1980) Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 9:467). Biodegradeable microspheres or capsules or other biodegradeable polymer configurations capable of sustained delivery of small molecules including peptides are known in the art (see, e.g., Putney (1998) Nat. Biotechnol. 16:153-157). Compounds of the invention can be incorporated within micelles (see, e.g., Suntres (1994) J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 46:23-28; Woodle (1992) Pharm. Res. 9:260-265). Peptides can be attached to the surface of the lipid monolayer or bilayer. For example, peptides can be attached to hydrazide-PEG-(distearoylphosphatidyl)ethanolamine-containing liposomes (see, e.g., Zalipsky (1995) Bioconjug. Chem. 6:705-708). Alternatively, any form of lipid membrane, such as a planar lipid membrane or the cell membrane of an intact cell, e.g., a red blood cell, can be used. Liposomal and lipid-containing formulations can be delivered by any means, including, for example, intravenous, transdermal (see, e.g., Vutla (1996) J. Pharm. Sci. 85:5-8), transmucosal, or oral administration.
A pharmaceutically acceptable formulation can incorporate about 1% to 99.9% of active ingredient (e.g., peptide or peptidomimetic). The pharmaceutical compositions can be sterilized by conventional, well-known sterilization techniques, or can be sterile filtered.
Additional pharmaceutical formulations and delivery systems are known in the art and are applicable in the methods and compositions of the invention (see, e.g., Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences (1990) 18th ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa.; The Merck Index (1996) 12th ed., Merck Publishing Group, Whitehouse, N.J.; Pharmaceutical Principles of Solid Dosage Forms, Technonic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, Pa., (1993); and Poznansky et al., Drug Delivery Systems, R. L. Juliano, ed., Oxford, N.Y. (1980), pp. 253-315).
The pharmaceutical formulations can be packaged in unit dosage form for ease of administration and uniformity of dosage. “Unit dosage form” as used herein refers to physically discrete unitary dosages for administration to the subject to be treated; each unit contains a predetermined quantity of compound that produces a desired effect in combination with a pharmaceutical carrier or excipient.
The invention further provides kits including invention compounds and pharmaceutical formulations thereof, optionally packaged into suitable packaging material. A kit typically includes a label or packaging insert including a description of the components or instructions for use in vitro, in vivo, or ex vivo, of the components therein. A kit can contain a collection of such components, e.g., two or more invention compounds or an invention compound in combination with a nucleic acid damaging agent or an anti-proliferative agent.
As shown in
Cyclization of peptides was accomplished using methods described by Kates et al. (278) and Mesfin et al (26). Briefly, N−α-Fmoc-L-aspartic acid-alpha-allyl ester at the C-terminus of the synthetic peptide was coupled to the resin via the gamma carboxylic acid. Removal of the Nα-Fmoc allowed the remaining amino acids to be incorporated sequentially into the growing peptide. A free alpha-carboxyl group was then generated upon removal of the allyl group from the C-terminal Asp (26, 278, 279). The peptidyl-resin was dried and flushed with nitrogen delivered through a septum. A catalyst solution was prepared separately by mixing 3 equivalent of Pd (PPh3)4 in CHCl3/acetic acid/N-4-methylmorpholine (15 mL/g of resin) and dissolved by bubbling nitrogen through the solution. The catalyst was transferred to the tube containing peptidyl-resin using a gas-tight syringe, and mixed for 2 h. Peptidyl-resin was washed consecutively with 0.5% DIPEA in DMF and 0.5% w/w DEDC in DMF to remove the catalyst. Fmoc was removed from the N-terminus and the free alpha-carboxyl group was then coupled to the free N-terminal residue of the peptide (while on the resin) in order to generate the cyclic peptide, which was then removed from the resin in such a way as to yield the gamma-carboxamido derivative (i.e., Asn).
One scheme for the production of the cyclic “ring and tail” peptides of the invention is shown in
Peptides were purified using a reverse-phase C18 Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters, Milford, Mass., USA) as previously described by DeFreest et al. Briefly, a sample containing a peptide of unknown purity was loaded onto a pre-washed cartridge and the sample was sequentially eluted with water, 10%, 30%, and 60% acetonitrile in water. The fraction containing peptide was then lyophilized. Peptides used for structure—activity relationship analysis were purified prior to use in biological assays, and those used in biological assays were at 95% or greater purity. Peptides were evaluated by mass spectrometry.
Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectra (MALDI-MS) were recorded on a Voyager-DE PRO BioSpectrometry Workstation from Applied Biosystems. Samples were dissolved in 50% aqueous acetonitrile and α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid was used as matrix. Positive ion electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) were recorded on a micromass Q-ToF-2 mass spectrometer. Samples were dissolved in 70% aqueous methanol and infused into the electrospray chamber with a needle voltage of 0.9 kV at a flow rate of 40 nl/min.
Peptides were synthesized using Fmoc solid-phase peptide synthesis on a Pioneer Peptide Synthesis System (PerSeptive Biosystems, Inc., Framingham, Mass.). Briefly, peptides were assembled on Fmoc-PAL-PEG-PS-resin (Applied Biosystems, Inc.) from the C-terminus, reacting the deblocked N-terminus of the incoming amino acid to form an amide bond. Amino acids used in the synthesis had their Nα-amino group protected by the 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) group, which was removed by piperidine at the end of each cycle in the synthesis. Side-chain protecting groups of amino acids were Asn (Trt), Gln (Trt), Glu (OtBu), Hyp (tBu), Thr (tBu) which were deprotected by trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) after peptide synthesis. The carboxyl group of the amino acid was activated with O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,2,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HATU).
After synthesis was completed, the resin was washed three times with 100% propanol and the cleavage reaction was achieved by incubating the resin in 10 ml TFA/thioanisole/anisole/1,2-ethanedithiol (90:5:2: 3) per 0.5 g resin for 5 hours. The cleavage reaction mixture was filtered using a sintered glass funnel to separate the solid resin from the peptide solution. Filtrate volume was reduced to 1 ml by evaporation facilitated with a gentle stream of air and the peptides were precipitated by addition of 15 ml dry-ice-chilled ethyl ether. The peptides were allowed to settle for 5 min at −80° C., and the supernatant was aspirated. The peptides were then washed twice in similar manner with 15 ml of ethyl acetate/diethylether (1.5: 1, room temperature), the peptides were dissolved in deionized water, purified by reverse-phase HPLC, lyophilized and stored at −20° C.
The anti-estrogenic activity of each peptide was then determined using the immature mouse uterine growth assay, MCF-7 xenograft assay, and cancer prevention assay, all as previously described.
The anti-breast cancer activity of the linear and cyclic 8-mer and 9-mer AFP-derived peptides is well-documented using the immature mouse uterine growth assay and the human breast cancer xenograft assay; there is a strong correlation between the results of these two assays. To evaluate peptide-induced inhibition by the peptide of the present invention of estrogen-stimulated proliferation of normal tissue, the immature mouse uterine growth assay was utilized. Briefly, 13-15 day-old Swiss/Webster female mice, 6-8 g in body weight, were distributed into treatment groups of 5 mice per group so that each group contained animals of the same range of body weight. The peptide of the invention was injected i.p., s.c., or p.o. into the mice. One hour later, estradiol (E2) or vehicle control for E2 was injected i.p. Twenty-two hours after the second injection, uteri were harvested, trimmed free of mesenteries, and immediately weighed. The uterine weights were normalized to mouse body weights to compensate for differences in body weight among litters of the same age. Experiments employed a minimum of five mice per group and the mean normalized uterine weight±SE for each group was calculated. Percent growth inhibition in a test group was calculated from normalized uterine wet weights as described below.
The peptides of the invention were evaluated for their ability to inhibit tumor growth in a human tumor xenograft assay. Briefly, MCF-7 human breast cancer cells were obtained from ATCC® (Rockville, Md.) and were grown in DMEM supplemented with 5% FCS, 1% non-essential amino acids, 10 ng/ml insulin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. MCF-7 cells from culture were solidified into a fibrin clot. The tumor-containing clots were cut into pieces about 1.5 mm in diameter and implanted under the kidney capsule of severe combined immunodeficient (ICR-SCID) mice (Taconic Farms, Germantown, N.Y.) as described in Bennett et al. (Clin. Cancer Res. 1998; 4:2877-84).
Estrogen supplementation of mice was required for the growth of MCF-7 tumors. Supplementation was accomplished by s.c. implantation of a Silastic tubing capsule containing solid E2 (2 mm in length) inserted on the day of tumor implantation. Tumor size was evaluated during survival laparotomy using a dissecting microscope at the time of tumor implantation and at days 15 and 30 after tumor implantation. Results are represented as the change in mean tumor volume (mm3).
The prevention study uses the methodology of Grubbs et al. (J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 71:625-628, 1983; Anticancer Res. 6:1395-1400, 1986) to test the ability of AFP peptides to prevent N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced breast cancers in rats. Briefly, female rats were housed three per cage in a room maintained at 72±2° F. and artificially lighted for 12 hours daily. At 50 days of age, rats received a single injection of MNU (50 mg/kg body weight) or vehicle in the jugular vein. NMU was given to animals from the various treatment groups according to a predetermined randomization chart to ensure uniform distribution of the carcinogen across the groups. Beginning 10 days after MNU exposure, treatment with AFP peptide by s.c. injection occurred once daily for 23 days, a time chosen to mimic the gestation period of rats, or for loner or shorter times. The peptide was diluted in saline and was given in an investigator-blinded manner at doses between 0.03 and 0.27 mg/rat daily in a volume of 0.2 ml. The control group of animals received daily 0.2 ml s.c. injections of saline for the same time as AFP peptide administration. Animals in the positive control group received only MNU treatment and experienced the maximal number of tumors. The negative control group of rats received no MNU and no AFP peptide. These animals generated no spontaneous tumors through out the course of the study. Additional groups of animals received MNU
Beginning 30 days after MNU treatment, all rats were palpated twice weekly for detection of mammary tumors, noting number, location, and size. Tumor burden was determined noninvasively with calipers by measuring the long (D) and short (d) diameters. Assuming that tumors were ellipsoid shaped, tumor volume was estimated as (π/6)(d)2 (D). All animals were checked daily for signs of toxicity. Most studies were terminated 100 days following MNU administration and at necropsy, tumors were dissected weighed.
The ability to inhibit E2-stimulated growth of normal'mouse uterus was used as a screening assay for biological activity of AFPep analogs. In general, inhibitory activity ≧20% is considered to be biologically significant. Each analog's inhibitory effect on E2-stimulated growth was compared to AFPep (a positive control) and to PGVGQ (a negative control). PGVGQ (amino acids 478-482 of AFP) is a portion of the primary structure of AFP near to the anti-cancer active site of AFP and is comprised of amino acids (P, V, and G) that are important components of AFPep. A scrambled analog of AFPep was not used because some scrambled peptides retain low biological activity (data not shown).
AFPep is a 9-amino acid peptide derived from alpha-fetoprotein, a protein of pregnancy. Based on prior data which show that AFPep exhibits a biphasic dose-response curve, we theorized that AFPep binds to a two-receptor system. (Receptors to which AFPep binds are believed to be receptors for AFP.) One binding site is a high affinity receptor that leads to inhibition of cancer growth. A second binding site is a lower affinity receptor that leads to promotion of cancer growth (See
At low dose, AFPep binds to the high affinity receptor and exhibits the upward swing of the dose response curve (
In this model, the high affinity receptor leads to inhibition of cancer growth. The lower affinity receptor leads to promotion of cancer growth. It is AFPep's ability to bind to both receptors that induces its undesired biphasic biological behavior. In a dose-response curve of biological activity AFPep's inhibition increases steadily until higher doses are introduced that lead to a decrease in tumor inhibition response.
These observations led to the idea that additional drug design considerations could offer opportunities to render the low affinity receptor completely inactive. In order to achieve this; an analog with a hydrophilic tail (to target the second receptor) was incorporated with an altered pharmacophore (so as to prevent signaling by the receptor). It is believed that this ring and tail peptide can bind preferentially to the low affinity receptor and shut it down. This analog would be expected to prevent any residual binding to the low affinity receptor of an analog that targets the high affinity receptor.
In order to fully understand the biphasic biological behaviors of AFPep we made various analogs with modifications that would give them a higher attraction to one of the receptors. We utilized an empirical approach of adding hydrophobic or hydrophilic ‘tails’ to the cyclic peptide in an effort to direct the analog to one receptor or the other. It was understood that hydrophobic tails steer the analogs towards the high affinity receptor and allow for optimal tumor inhibition. Yet these high affinity receptor analogs still exhibited biphasic behavior. We believe that the once all of the high affinity receptors become occupied the remaining analogs will bind to the low affinity receptors.
We have also shown that an analog with a hydrophobic tail binds more strongly towards the low affinity receptor. One approach to deter the biphasic response of AFPep would be an analog that is steered towards the low affinity receptor with a hydrophilic tail and has a modified pharmacophore to enable it to bind and deactivate the receptor. This would elicit a sigmoidal dose response when high doses of the high affinity analog are used.
In one embodiment, an analog which can bind and deactivate the receptor has one modification in the pharmacophore and a lysine hydrophilic tail. By substituting a glycine for the first asparagine in the AFPep hydrophilic analog having the sequence (EKTOVNOGN)K, an antagonist having the sequence (EKTOVGOGN)K was created. The change from asparagine to glycine alters the charge of the pharmacophore and also decreases the length of the side group at that point.
As can be seen in
This application claims the priority of U.S. provisional application No. 61/295,897 filed Jan. 18, 2010, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference into the present application.
The present application was made with support from the National Institutes of Health Grant Nos. 5R01 CA102540, R15 CA115524, 5R25 GM062460 and T34 GM008718 and Department of Defense Grant Nos. W81XWH-04-1-0486 and BC031067; National Science Foundation Grant Nos. CHE-0457275, CHE-0116435 and CHE-0521063. The U.S. Government has certain rights in this invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2011/021560 | 1/18/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/29/2012 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61295897 | Jan 2010 | US |
