The present invention relates to the field of firearms and more particularly relates to an improved ammunition magazine.
Ammunition magazines are well known in the art of firearms. Their basic construction is a containment shell with two open ends. One end is deemed the “floor” of the magazine and is covered by a plate while the opposite end is the “feed” end and interfaces with the weapon. Inside the volume defined by the shell and plate is a spring and follower assembly. When ammunition is loaded into the magazine, the ammunition pushes the follower down towards the floor and thereby compresses the spring. In use, when one cartridge of ammunition is expended, the compressed spring releases and pushes the follower and associated ammunition upwards toward the feed end and the next round of ammunition is thereby readied.
Prior magazines have been manufactured in many different configurations and of different materials. Perhaps the best known in the U.S. are the AK-47 and the USGI AR15/M16 magazines. These magazines function similarly, though they are made with slight variations to interface with their host system. Of notable difference is that the AK-47 magazine has a relatively constant curvature while the AR15/M16 magazine has a less curved lower region that gradually resolves to a more linear function towards the feed end. Both use the same type of internal system. Of particular note with both, and all follower magazine systems, is that the system works well only as the follower smoothly and levelly travels the inside of the magazine. As the follower must move, there is room for the follower in all the known prior art magazines to move axially, or “wobble” and possibly jam. This is notorious in the AR15/M16 magazine style as the geometry of the magazine is inherently not uniform.
The present invention is a polymer magazine with angularly shaped guide rails to interface with the internal follower, thereby restricting axial motion of the follower. The magazine also features a load indicator and a two-piece floor plate locking system. The present invention represents a departure from the prior art in that the magazine of the present invention allows for more stable and level motion of the follower while the magazine is loaded or unloaded.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages inherent in the known types of ammunition magazines, this invention provides an improved magazine. As such, the present invention's general purpose is to provide a new and improved magazine that is backwards compatible with known weapon platforms and presents a more stable follower and follower path.
To accomplish these objectives, the improved ammunition magazine comprises a plurality of lateral angularly shaped guide rails within the magazine shell and a follower that is configured to abut them. By interfacing with more internal structure, all non-advantageous linear and axial motion is inhibited and the follower is then more stable in its progress. The magazine also features a polymer construction and an ammunition load indicator system. The magazine also features a cover for storage.
The more important features of the invention have thus been outlined in order that the more detailed description that follows may be better understood and in order that the present contribution to the art may better be appreciated. Additional features of the invention will be described hereinafter and will form the subject matter of the claims that follow.
Many objects of this invention will appear from the following description and appended claims, reference being made to the accompanying drawings forming a part of this specification wherein like reference characters designate corresponding parts in the several views.
Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
With reference now to the drawings, the preferred embodiment of the ammunition magazine is herein described. It should be noted that the articles “a”, “an” and “the”, as used in this specification, include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
With reference to
Inside the body 10, along the fore side of the magazine 1, is a ridge 19, shown in
As shown in
At the top of ridge 19 is a slight tab 29 (
In an embodiment, the magazine body is comprised of a reinforced thermoplastic polymer selected to resist damage from use (e.g., the ejection of a magazine which causes the magazine to impact a hard surface, which may occur during a speed reload). However, other polymers may be used and the magazines may be made in any color or opacity (which can reduce or eliminate the need for a magazine level indicator). Some polymers may be used without reinforcement. Various reinforcement materials, such as glass, carbon (e.g., carbon fiber or carbon nanotubes), minerals, or metals (e.g., steel, titanium, aluminum, etc.) may also be used to reinforce the magazine. Likewise, the magazine body may be made of other materials having suitable strength and durability, such as titanium, ceramics, laminates, amorphous metals, etc. The follower is preferred to be made of polyoxymethylene, or acetal resin, available commercially from DuPont under the trade name DELRIN, though other materials are suitable, just not preferred.
The magazine 1 is structured to increase its structural integrity. To that end, fore ridge 19 provides added durability to the magazine. Protective cover 40 also provides reinforcement during storage, as pressures from the stored ammunition and spring 35 would normally force the feed lips 21 of the magazine 1 apart. Protective cover 40, shown in
The cover 40 also serves as a magazine tool as the cover latch 43 will fit between the feed lips 21 so as to push rounds of ammunition 50 out of the magazine 1 (
It should also be noted that magazine body 10 presents a constant internal curve, with slight straightening near the interior rear face of the feed lips only to allow interface with a weapon. As such, the follower 30 and associated ammunition travel more smoothly through the magazine body 10 with lessened round stack variation.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, numerous modifications and variations can be made and still the result will come within the scope of the invention. No limitation with respect to the specific embodiments disclosed herein is intended or should be inferred.
The present Application for Patent is a reissue of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/661,620 entitled “Ammunition Magazine” filed Jul. 27, 2017 and issued on Sep. 11, 2018 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,072,903, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/632,804 entitled “Ammunition Magazine” filed Feb. 26, 2015 and issued on Aug. 29, 2017 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,746,264, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/461,229 entitled “Ammunition Magazine” filed Aug. 15, 2014 and issued on Mar. 31, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,991,086, which is a Continuation-in-Part of patent application Ser. No. 14/098,467 entitled “Ammunition Magazine” filed Dec. 5, 2013 and issued on Sep. 23, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,839,543, which is a Continuation of patent application Ser. No. 13/307,431 entitled “Ammunition Magazine” filed Nov. 30, 2011 and issued on Jan. 28, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,635,796, which is a Continuation of prior filed U.S. application Ser. No. 12/354,766, filed Jan. 15, 2009 and issued on Dec. 6, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,069,601 which, in turn, is a Continuation-in-Part of prior filed U.S. application Ser. No. 11/958,274, filed on Dec. 17, 2007 issued on Mar. 22, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,908,780, which, in turn, claims priority to earlier filed U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/941,646, filed on Jun. 1, 2007. Each of these patents and applications are assigned to the assignee hereof and are hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1323063 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1919 | A |
3395479 | Collins | Aug 1968 | A |
3443334 | Ardonlino | May 1969 | A |
3453762 | Fremont | Jul 1969 | A |
4127954 | Hausmann | Dec 1978 | A |
4408409 | Arias | Oct 1983 | A |
4589218 | Teppa | May 1986 | A |
4672760 | Chesnut et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
5113605 | Kim | May 1992 | A |
5149897 | Howard | Sep 1992 | A |
5309660 | Blackamore | May 1994 | A |
5345660 | Howard | Sep 1994 | A |
5956878 | Yang | Sep 1999 | A |
7093386 | Vieweg | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7533483 | Alazmora et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7908780 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8069601 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8225541 | Bigley et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8635796 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8839543 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8991086 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9746264 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10072903 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
20030066227 | Fitzpatrick | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20100101132 | Jacobson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110005113 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110113663 | Nakayama | May 2011 | A1 |
20140215878 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150184983 | Pink et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
654386 | Dec 1937 | DE |
1094155 | Dec 1960 | DE |
0608072 | Jul 1994 | EP |
2208957 | Jul 2010 | EP |
275606 | Oct 1927 | GB |
Entry |
---|
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 5,638,626 (Westrom)”, “Prior Art Exhibit J in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries”, p. 21, Published in: US. |
Magpul, “Magpul PMAG Versus a Chevy Truck”, “Retreived from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCFXcOOb4jc”, Feb. 24, 2007, p. 3, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “Office Action Regarding U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,460”, dated Oct. 19, 2018, p. 29, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen, “Response to office action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 16/100,460”, dated Mar. 14, 2019, p. 13, Published in: US. |
Nash, William B., “Magpul Industries Corp., V. Brookshire Tool and MFG. Company, Inc. DBA Promag Industries Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-01983-”, “First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims”, Feb. 18, 2014, p. 19, Published in: US. |
Nash, William B., “Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-01983-RBJ; Magpul Industries Corp. V. Brookshire Tool and MFG Company, Inc. DBA Promag Industries”, “Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims”, Mar. 11, 2014, p. 19, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 7,533,483 (Alzamora)”, “Prior Art Exhibit A in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc”, p. 34, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 3,377,732 (Bivens)”, “Prior Art Exhibit K in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 26, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 7,497,044 (Cammenga)”, “Prior Art Exhibit F in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 22, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 3,906,652 (Evans)”, “Prior Art Exhibit L in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 17, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 3,465,463 (Grandy)”, “Prior Art Exhibit H in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 18, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen, “Response to Office Action Regarding U.S. Appl. No. 15/661,620”, dated Mar. 30, 2018, p. 11, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 2,081,235 (Hillyard)”, “Prior Art Exhibit E in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 21, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “United States Offrice Action Re U.S. Appl. No. 15/661,620”, dated Nov. 2, 2017, p. 54, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 2,783,570 (Kunz)”, “Prior Art Exhibit G in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 15, Published in: US. |
Tactical Testing & Evaluation, LLC, “Magpul PMAG”, “Downloaded from http://ttellc.net/pmag.htm”, Oct. 14, 2007, p. 2, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 3,73,686 (Moller)”, “Prior Art Exhibit C in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 24, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 3,110,122 (Musgrave)”, “Prior Art Exhibit I in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 20, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 3,226,869 (Musgrave)”, “Prior Art Exhibit D in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 22, Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_02jpg”, “Printed Publications on www.magpul.com”, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 2, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp, Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_03.jpg”, “Printed Publications on www.magpul.com”, Dec. 2, 2007, p. 2 Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp., Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_04.jpg”, “Printed Publications on www.magpul.com”, Dec. 2, 2007, p. 2, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp., Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_05.jpg”, “Pritned Publication on www.magpul.com”, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 2, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp., Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_06.jpg”, “Printed Publications on www.magpul.com”, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 2, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp, Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “The sale and/or offer for sale of the Magpul PMAG”, Apr. 28, 2007, p. 6, Published in: US. |
“Claims Chart Re U.S. Pat. No. 4,589,218 (Teppa)”, “Prior Art Exhibit B in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Comapny, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries”, p. 28, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “United States Office Action Re U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,804”, dated Feb. 2, 2017, p. 8, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “United States Office Action Re U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,804”, dated Apr. 15, 2016, p. 35, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “United States Office Action Re U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,804”, dated Aug. 8, 2016, p. 10, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action Re U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,804”, dated Jan. 9, 2016, p. 11, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action Re U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,804”, dated May 1, 2017, p. 8, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action Re U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,804”, dated Jun. 15, 2016, p. 16, Published in: US. |
Nash, William B., “MAGPUL Industries Corp., v. Brookshire Tool and MFG. Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-”, “First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses . . . ”, Feb. 18, 2014, p. 19, Published in: US. |
Nash, William B., “Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ; Magpul Industries Corp. v. Brookshire Tool and MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Indsutri”, Mar. 11, 2014, p. 19, Published in: US. |
“Alzamora Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 7,533,483”, “Exhibit A”, p. 34, Published in: US. |
Adams, W. Thad, “Re: Magpul Industries Corp. v. Big Rock Sports, LLC; Magpul Industries Corp. v. Plinker Arms, LLC”, Sep. 9, 2013, p. 8, Published in: US. |
“Bivens Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 3,377,732”, p. 26, Published in: US. |
“Cammenga Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 7,497,044”, “Exhibit F”, p. 22, Published in: US. |
Long, Alexander S., “Report of the conduct of Geoffrey E. Dobbin pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 11.803”, Dec. 13, 2013, p. 8, Published in: US. |
“Document Production for Civil ActionMagpul Industries Corp. v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, p. 92, Published in: US. |
“Evans Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 3,906,652”, p. 17, Published in: US. |
“Grandy Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 3,465,463”, p. 18, Published in: US. |
“Hillyard Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 2,081,235”, p. 21, Published in: US. |
Adam Webber—hkparts.net, “Product page for G36 30 Round Mag”, Oct. 9, 2013, p. 2, Publisher: Page downloaded from www.hkparts.net/shop/pc/G36-30-Round-Mag-13p624.htm downloaded on, Published in: US. |
“Kunz Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 2,783,570”, p. 15, Published in: US. |
“Moller Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 3,736,686”, p. 24, Published in: US. |
“Musgrave Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 3,110,122”, p. 20, Published in: US. |
“Musgrave Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 3,226,869”, p. 22, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,467”, dated Mar. 21, 2014, p. 42, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,431”, dated Apr. 5, 2013, p. 7, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,467”, dated Apr. 8, 2014, p. 5, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 14/461,229”, dated Oct. 9, 2014, p. 27, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,431”, dated Nov. 2, 2012, p. 8, Published in: US. |
Johnson, Stephen, “Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,431”, dated Nov. 22, 2013, p. 21, Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “Printed Publications on www.magpul.com”, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 2, Retrieved from http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_02jpg. Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “Printed Publications on www.magpul.com”, Dec. 2, 2007, p. 2, Retrieved form http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_03.jpg. Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “Printed Publications on www.magpul.com”, Dec. 2, 2007, p. 2, Retrieved from http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_04.jpg. Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “Pritned Publication on www.magpul.com”, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 2, Retrieved from http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmg1_05.jpg. Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “Printed Publications on www.magpul.com”, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 2, Retrieved from http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1_06.jpg. Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp. “Magpul PMag versus a Chevy Truck.” Feb. 24, 2007. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCFXcOOb4jc. |
Nash, William B., “ProMag's Invalidity Contentions”, “Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries”, Apr. 28, 2014, p. 11, Published in: US. |
Nash, William B., “PROMAG's Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. D614,719S”, “Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ- MAGPUL Industries Corp., v. Brookshire Tool and MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries”, May 12, 2014, p. 9, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,467”, dated Mar. 28, 2014, p. 15, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,467”, dated Apr. 8, 2014, p. 13, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,431”, dated Oct. 4, 2013, p. 22, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,431”, dated Nov. 25, 2013, p. 22, Published in: US. |
Gruber, Stephen S., “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 14/461,229”, dated Dec. 11, 2014, p. 13, Published in: US. |
Dobbin, Geoffrey, “Response to Office Action re U.S. Appl. No. 13/307,431”, dated Mar. 14, 2013, p. 10, Published in: US. |
Steyr Mannlicher International, “Product Page for Steyr AUG 30 Round Black Magazine”, Oct. 9, 2013, p. 3, Publisher: Page downloaded from http://www.steyrarms.com/store/index.php/magazines/auto-5.html downloaded on, Published in: US. |
“Teppa Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 4,589,218”, p. 28, Published in: US. |
Fitzpatrick, et al., “Specification for related U.S. Appl. No. 14/098,467”, filed Dec. 5, 2013, p. 21, Published in: US. |
Fitzpatrick, et al., “Specification for related U.S. Appl. No. 60/941,646”, filed Jun. 1, 2007, p. 7, Published in: US. |
“Westrom Chart re U.S. Pat. No. 5,638,626”, p. 21, Published in: US. |
Tactical Testing & Evaluation, LLC. “Magpul PMAG.” Oct. 14, 2007. Retrieved from http://ttellc.net/pmag.htm. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14632804 | Feb 2015 | US |
Child | 15661620 | US | |
Parent | 14461229 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 14632804 | US | |
Parent | 13307431 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14098467 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14098467 | Dec 2013 | US |
Child | 14461229 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15661620 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 17017408 | US |