The present invention relates to the field of firearms and more particularly relates to an improved ammunition magazine.
Ammunition magazines are well known in the art of firearms. Their basic construction is a containment shell with two open ends. One end is deemed the “floor” of the magazine and is covered by a plate while the opposite end is the “feed” end and interfaces with the weapon. Inside the volume defined by the shell and plate is a spring and follower assembly. When ammunition is loaded into the magazine, the ammunition pushes the follower down towards the floor and thereby compresses the spring. In use, when one cartridge of ammunition is expended, the compressed spring releases and pushes the follower and associated ammunition upwards toward the feed end and the next round of ammunition is thereby readied.
Prior magazines have been manufactured in many different configurations and of different materials. Perhaps the best known in the U.S. are the AK-47 and the USGI AR15/M16 magazines. These magazines function similarly, though they are made with slight variations to interface with their host system. Of notable difference is that the AK-47 magazine has a relatively constant curvature while the AR15/M16 magazine has a less curved lower region that gradually resolves to a more linear function towards the feed end. Both use the same type of internal system. Of particular note with both, and all follower magazine systems, is that the system works well only as the follower smoothly and levelly travels the inside of the magazine. As the follower must move, there is room for the follower in all the known prior art magazines to move axially, or “wobble” and possibly jam. This is notorious in the AR15/M16 magazine style as the geometry of the magazine is inherently not uniform.
The present invention is a polymer magazine with angularly shaped guide rails to interface with the internal follower, thereby restricting axial motion of the follower. The magazine also features a load indicator and a two-piece floor plate locking system. The present invention represents a departure from the prior art in that the magazine of the present invention allows for more stable and level motion of the follower while the magazine is loaded or unloaded.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages inherent in the known types of ammunition magazines, this invention provides an improved magazine. As such, the present invention's general purpose is to provide a new and improved magazine that is backwards compatible with known weapon platforms and presents a more stable follower and follower path.
To accomplish these objectives, the improved ammunition magazine comprises a plurality of lateral angularly shaped guide rails within the magazine shell and a follower that is configured to abut them. By interfacing with more internal structure, all non-advantageous linear and axial motion is inhibited and the follower is then more stable in its progress. The magazine also features a polymer construction and an ammunition load indicator system. The magazine also features a cover for storage.
The more important features of the invention have thus been outlined in order that the more detailed description that follows may be better understood and in order that the present contribution to the art may better be appreciated. Additional features of the invention will be described hereinafter and will form the subject matter of the claims that follow.
Many objects of this invention will appear from the following description and appended claims, reference being made to the accompanying drawings forming a part of this specification wherein like reference characters designate corresponding parts in the several views.
Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
a is a perspective view of the floor and lock plates according to the present invention.
b is a side plan view of the floor and lock plates of
c is an alternative perspective view of the floor and lock plates of
a is a side plan view of the follower of
b is a front plan view of the follower of
c is a rear plan view of the follower of
d is a bottom plan view of the follower of
e is a sectional view of the follower of
a is a side plan view of the impact cover of
b is a front plan view of the impact cover of
c is a rear plan view of the impact cover of
d is a bottom plan view of the impact cover of
e is a sectional view of the impact cover of
a-11c are successive plan views showing use of the impact cover as a magazine unloading tool.
a-12c are successive plan views showing use of the impact cover to disassemble the magazine.
With reference now to the drawings, the preferred embodiment of the ammunition magazine is herein described. It should be noted that the articles “a”, “an” and “the”, as used in this specification, include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
With reference to
Inside the body 10, along the fore side of the magazine 1, is a ridge 19, shown in FIGS. 6,7, and 8. The ridge serves three purposes. The first purpose is to provide additional stability and strength to the magazine body 10. The second purpose is to divide tips of cartridges, left from right, in their off-set stacking in the magazine. The third purpose is to provide an additional interface with the follower 30 to prevent forward linear and axial tilt. In order to accommodate stripper clips, the ridge 19 may terminate at a point significantly below the feed lips, about 0.5 inches for a .223 Remington caliber magazine, as shown in
As shown in
At the top of ridge 19 is a slight tab 29 (
In the preferred embodiment, the magazine body is comprised of a long glass-reinforced thermoplastic polymer selected to resist the heat generated from firing a rifle. However, other polymers, like polycarbonate, may be used and the magazines may be made in any color or opacity (which can reduce or eliminate the need for a magazine level indicator). Some polymers, such as polycarbonate, may be used without reinforcement. Other reinforcement materials, such as steel, carbon fiber, or other materials may also be used to reinforce the magazine. Likewise, the magazine body may be made of other materials having suitable strength and durability, such as titanium, ceramics, laminates, amorphous metals, etc. The follower is preferred to be made of polyoxymethylene, or acetal resin, available commercially from DuPont under the trade name DELRIN®, though other materials are suitable, just not preferred.
The magazine 1 is structured to increase its structural integrity. To that end, fore ridge 19 provides added durability to the magazine. Protective cover 40 also provides reinforcement during storage, as pressures from the stored ammunition and spring 35 would normally force the feed lips 21 of the magazine 1 apart. Protective cover 40, shown in
The cover 40 also serves as a magazine tool as the cover latch 43 will fit between the feed lips 21 so as to push rounds of ammunition 50 out of the magazine 1 (
It should also be noted that magazine body 10 presents a constant internal curve, with slight straightening near the interior rear face of the feed lips only to allow interface with a weapon. As such, the follower 30 and associated ammunition travel more smoothly through the magazine body 10 with lessened round stack variation.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, numerous modifications and variations can be made and still the result will come within the scope of the invention. No limitation with respect to the specific embodiments disclosed herein is intended or should be inferred.
The present Application for Patent is a Continuation of patent application Ser. No. 13/307,431 entitled “Ammunition Magazine” filed Nov. 30, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,635,796, which is a Continuation of prior filed U.S. application Ser. No. 12/354,766, filed Jan. 15, 2009 and issued on Dec. 6, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,069,601 which, in turn, is a Continuation-in-Part of prior filed U.S. application Ser. No. 11/958,274, filed on Dec. 17, 2007 issued on Mar. 22, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 7,908,780, which, in turn, claims priority to earlier filed U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/941,646, filed on Jun. 1, 2007. Each of these patents and applications are assigned to the assignee hereof and are hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4127954 | Hausmann | Dec 1978 | A |
4589218 | Teppa | May 1986 | A |
4672760 | Chesnut et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
5309660 | Blackamore | May 1994 | A |
5345660 | Howard | Sep 1994 | A |
7093386 | Vieweg | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7533483 | Alzamora et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
20030066227 | Fitzpatrick | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
654 386 | Dec 1937 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Nash, William B., “Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, MAGPUL Industries Corp. v. Brookshire Tool and MFG. Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries”, Document 33, Feb. 18, 2014, p. 19 Published in: US. |
Nash, William B., “Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, MAGPUL Industries Corp. v. Brookshire Tool and MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries”, Document 35, Mar. 11, 2014, p. 19 Published in: US. |
Adams, W. Thad, “RE: Magpul Industries Corp. v. Big Rock Sports, LLC; Magpul Industries Corp. v. Plinker Arms, LLC”, Sep. 9, 2013, p. 8 Published in: US. |
Long, Alexander S., “Report of the conduct of Geoffrey E. Dobbin pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 11.803”, Dec. 13, 2013, p. 8 Published in: US. |
Langlotz, Bennet, “RE: Magpul's Settlement Proposal”, Nov. 12, 2013, p. 19 Published in: US. |
http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1—02jpg, Printed Publications found on www.magpul.com, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 1, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp, Published in: US. |
http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1—03.jpg, Printed Publications found on www.magpul.com, Dec. 2, 2007, p. 1, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp., Published in: US. |
http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1—04.jpg, Printed Publications found on www.magpul.com, Dec. 2, 2007, p. 1, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp., Published in: US. |
http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmg1—05.jpg, Printed Publication found on www.magpul.com, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 1, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp., Published in: US. |
http://www.magpul.com/catalog/images/pmag1—06.jpg, Printed Publications found on www.magpul.com, Jul. 16, 2007, p. 1, Publisher: Magpul Industries Corp, Published in: US. |
Magpul Industries, Corp., “The sale and/or offer for sale of the Magpul PMAG”, Apr. 28, 2007, p. 2 Published in: US. |
Magpul PMag v. a Chevy Truck, Printed Publication found at http://www.yotube.com/watch?v=UCFXCOO4jc, Feb. 24, 2009, p. 3 Publisher: Magpul Industries, Corp., Published in: US. |
Magpul PMag, Printed Publication found at http://tellc.net/pmag.htm, Oct. 14, 2007, p. 11, Publisher: Tactical Testing & Evaluation, Published in: US. |
Nash, William B., “PROMAG's Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Patent No. D614,719S”, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ—Magpul Industries Corp., V. Brookshire Tool and MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, May 12, 2014, p. 9, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit A in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 7,533,483 (Alzamora)”, p. 34, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit K in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 3,377,732 (Bivens)”, p. 26, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit F in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 7,497,044 (Cammenga)”, p. 22, Published in: US. |
“Document Production for Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, PRO001269-PRO001360, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries”, p. 92 Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit L in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 3,906,652 (Evans)”, p. 17, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit H in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 3,465,463 (Grandy)”, p. 18, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit E in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No, 2,081,235 (Hillyard)”, p. 21, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit G in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 2,783,570 (Kunz)”, p. 15, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit C in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 3,736,686 (Moller)”, p. 24, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit I in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 3,110,122 (Musgrave)”, p. 20, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit D in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 3,226,869 (Musgrave)”, p. 22, Published in: US. |
Nash, William B., “ProMag's Invalidity Contentions”, “Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba Promag Industries”, Apr. 28, 2014, p. 11, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit B in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 4,589,218 (Teppa)”, p. 28, Published in: US. |
Prior Art Exhibit J in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01983-RBJ, Magpul Industries Corp v. Brookshire Tool & MFG Company, Inc. dba PROMAG Industries, “Claims Chart re US Patent No. 5,638,626 (Westrom)”, p. 21, Published in: US. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140215878 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60941646 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13307431 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14098467 | US | |
Parent | 12354766 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 13307431 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11958274 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 12354766 | US |