The present invention relates to a unidirectional serial link across wired media, such as a chip-to-chip or a card-to-card interconnect comprising an analog transmitter portion and an analog receiver portion.
Serial data must be transmitted across wired media The transmit and receive sections include chips wired to one another and card-to-card interconnects. The transmission media can be a combination of printed circuit board, connectors, backplane wiring, fiber or cable. The interconnect can include its own power, data and clocking sources or may derive these functions from a host module. Such data has typically been transmitted through a parallel data bus, such as ISA, PCI, PCI-X and the like. One drawback of such parallel links is the moderate rate of data transmission due to improved microprocessor performance, resulting in data transfer bandwidths that typically outpace I/O transfer rates. Also, the ASIC I/O count is high. In addition, the system integration I/O count using a parallel data bus is high. Finally, the overall system cost associated with the use of the parallel data bus tends to be high.
Related art shows attempts to overcome these difficulties and drawbacks by utilizing serial communication systems involving a variety of schemes. For example, some have used a carrier-less amplitude/phase (CAP) modulation scheme. Others have used a linear compression/decompression and digital signal processing techniques for frequency modulation. Still others use a linear (analog) phase rotator to recover only the carrier of an incoming signal. Some transmit using a pass band, which limits the bandwidth of the frequencies being passed, rather than a baseband channel wherein the signals are not shared and the frequencies are not restricted.
The present analog invention is related to a unified digital architecture comprising logic transmitter portions and logic receiver portions. A unified serial link system and method for transmitting digital data across wired media including a transmitter and a receiver portion is provided, one of the transmitter portion and receiver portion comprising a phase locked loop (PLL) circuit. The PLL circuit comprises a voltage control oscillator, a frequency divider, a phase-frequency detector, a charge pump and a multi-pole loop filter. One embodiment comprises a dual loop PLL having a digital coarse loop and an analog fine loop.
The unified digital architecture is described more fully in incorporated related applications. One embodiment of the unified digital architecture described in the incorporated applications comprises a logic transmitter portion containing a phase locked loop (PLL), a di-bit data register, a finite impulse response (FIR) filter and a transmit data register. Said unified digital architecture also comprises a Pseudo-Random Bit Stream (PRBS) generator and a checker. The digital receiver portion contains a PLL, an FIR phase rotator and a phase rotator control state machine, and a clock buffer, and may also include a Pseudo-Random Bit Stream (PRBS) generator and a checker for diagnostics.
Referring now to
The transmitter PLL 12 is the clock source for the transmitted data and preferably runs at the full data rate. At full rate, less duty cycle distortion and jitter occur, and the present embodiment of the invention is able to run at full rate efficiently. A frequency reference is 1/nth target data rate. For example for n=4, 625 Mhz is required for an operational data rate of 2.5 Gbps. A single clock phase is buffered and brought out of the PLL 12 and is intended to drive into the Phase Buffer circuit 14.
The PLL 12 illustrated contains a multi-stage, voltage controlled ring oscillator (VCO) 18, a frequency divider 20, phase-frequency detector 22, charge pump 24 and multi-pole “ripple capacitor” loop filter 26. These elements form a “fine” control loop 27. Although, in the embodiment of the invention described herein, the VCO 18 is a four-stage oscillator and the frequency divider 20 is a four-times divider, other stage and divider multiples will be apparent to one skilled in the art, and the invention is not limited to the specific four-stage oscillator and four-times divider elements described. The fine control loop 27 is a conventional analog loop and is intended to provide a stable low-noise low-jitter clock source for the transmitter circuit 10. The range, gain and bandwidth of the loop 27 is designed to compensate for relatively high frequency but small perturbations due to power supply changes and the coarse loop.
Referring now to
Referring now to
In a conventional ring oscillator, the oscillation frequency is determined as 1/(2Nτ), where N is the number of stages and τ is the unit delay time of a delay cell. Hence, the frequency of oscillation is decided by the delay time of one delay element. Higher operation frequency and wider tuning range are achieved in the embodiment of the invention illustrated in
Referring now to
To utilize both negative skewed and normal delay paths, the pair of PMOS transistors (T6, T7) 48 are added to the PMOS loads of the delay cell 40 and are used to take the negative skewed signals. The negative skewed signal is connected to the PMOS input of the delay cell 40 and the normal signal is connected to the NMOS input of the delay cell. The negative skewed signal is taken from the two stages before the current delay stage. The signal prematurely turns on the PMOS during the output transition and compensates for the performance of the PMOS, which is usually slower than that of the NMOS.
A second pair of NMOS transistors (T8,T9) 50 is inserted in shunt with the original NMOS cross coupled pair 46. These devices are smaller and longer and, therefore, have less effect on performance. This allows for a “fine” control of the delay cell.
Referring again to
The coarse control loop is a digital representation of a conventional analog control loop based on a “leaky” loop filter capacitor. That type of loop relies on leakage from the loop filter circuit 26 to drive the control voltage in a particular direction regardless of the frequency of the VCO 18. This leakage is compensated by the phase detector 22 and charge pump 24, which only increase the charge on the loop filter circuit 26. The loop is stable when the charge added to the loop filter circuit 26 balances the charge that is leaking.
The PLL control logic 64 in the coarse control loop has an up/down counter (not shown) whose value represents the charge on the loop filter circuit 26. This counter is slowly decremented to represent leakage. The voltage comparator 62 is high or low depending on whether the fine control voltage is operating in the upper or lower half of its range. To balance the leakage, the control logic 64 samples the comparator 62 output. After multiple samples showing upper range operation, the up/down counter (not shown) is incremented to represent adding charge to the loop filter circuit 26. The up/down counter (not shown) output is converted to a control voltage by the DAC 66 and low-pass filter 68. The coarse control loop is intended to compensate for manufacturing process and relatively low frequency but large changes due to power supply and temperature drift. It is discussed more thoroughly in the co-pending application previously incorporated, Ser. No. 09/996,113, filed Nov. 28, 2001, for “Unified Digital Architecture.”
Referring again to
The phase buffers 72 may comprise any circuits that drive clocks from sources to circuits that have high capacitive loading due to wiring and/or gate loading. At the clock rates used in the present invention, phase buffers 72 are important in assuring reasonable rise and fall times, duty cycle, and jitter performance of system clocks. The phase buffers 72 are described in more detail later in this specification in the description of the receiver PLL circuitry.
One embodiment of an equalization driver circuit 16 is illustrated in
Referring now to
An embodiment of the receiver circuit 114 according to the present invention is illustrated in
Receiver circuit 114 is comprised of a bias network and two differential amplifiers 120. A CBIAS cell 122 provides a DC reference voltage for a PMOS transistor 124 that is then converted to a reference voltage for an NMOS transistor 126. Two stages of amplification were chosen to try to maximize gain and bandwidth; however, the invention is not limited to two stages.
The latch 110 illustrated in
With CLK-Q delay <300 p (nominal) and a sample and hold window <35 p as performance boundaries, an embodiment of the latch circuit 110 illustrated in
The sampling latch circuit 110 has a negative setup and hold window. It was measured with respect to the output of the latches 110 (and not with respect to the output of the latch buffer 112). Any CLK-data delay that result in more than 300 ps CLK-Q delay was also included in this window calculation. The preferred sample and hold window for this latch is 10 ps.
Referring again to
The receive PLL 101 of
The fine control loop 159 is a conventional analog loop and is intended to provide a stable low-noise low-jitter clock source for the receiver. The range, gain and bandwidth of the loop is designed to compensate for relatively high frequency but small perturbations due to power supply changes and the coarse loop.
The coarse control loop is a digital representation of a conventional analog control loop based on a “leaky” loop filter capacitor. That type of loop relies on leakage from the “loop filter cap” to drive the control voltage in a particular direction regardless of the frequency of the receive VCO 150. This leakage is compensated by the phase detector 154 and charge pump 156 that only increase the charge on the “cap.” The loop is stable when the charge being added to the cap balances the charge that is leaking.
The receive PLL control logic 164 in the coarse control loop has an up/down counter (not shown) whose value represents the charge on a loop filter cap. This counter is slowly decremented to represent leakage. The voltage comparator 162 is high or low depending on whether the fine control voltage is operating in upper or lower half of its range. To balance the leakage, the receive PLL control logic 164 samples the comparator 162 output. After multiple samples showing upper range operation, the up/down counter is incremented to represent adding charge to the loop filter cap. The up/down counter output is converted to a control voltage by the DAC 166 and low-pass filter 168. The coarse control loop is intended to compensate for manufacturing process and relatively low frequency but large changes due to power supply and temperature drift.
It is preferred that the receive PLL 101 operate from about 1 GHz to about 1.6 GHz across a range of operating conditions, and that it produce six evenly spaced phases. The digital coarse loop is used to compensate for process and temperature to put the receive VCO 150 in the desired operating range. The lower bandwidth analog fine loop is then able to lock to the reference clock and produce six stable 1.0 GHz to 1.6 GHz phases. Other embodiments of the invention (not shown) may have a value range greater or smaller, or covering a different value range; the range described is for illustrative purposes only and in no way limits the application and practice of the invention. The reference level for the comparator 162 is produced by cbias (not shown).
The phase rotator 106 is an analog circuit and, as such, is a device allowing a step by step, glitch-free modulo shift of all n phases of the receive VCO 150 at the input to any phase angle at the output. The modulo option is guaranteeing phase and frequency compensation capability, the glitch-free performance assures that no bits are lost during rotation and ‘step by step’ means that the amount of phase change is limited to one phase slice for each clock cycle.
The concept of the phase rotator 106 is based on FIR filter principles. The receive VCO 150 may be seen as a circular array of delay elements. By multiplying the outputs t, n of the array with weighting factors m, n and summing the values, an FIR filter is built. The number of taps determine the amount of oversampling and, therefore, the order of an analog filter required for alias filtering. If the weighting factors may be changed dynamically, the FIR filter response may be changed ‘on the fly’. This allows the dynamic adjustment of the output phase of such a filter.
It is preferred that the phase rotator 106 receive all six phases from the receive VCO 150 and provide a step by step shift to all six phases to any of 54 possible phase angles at the output. Thus, it will rotate all six phases in 6.67 degree steps which, for a 2.5 Gbit system, corresponds to 14.8 ps. By taking specific weights of each phase, the phase rotator 106 outputs 6 shifted phases. The phases are generated in differential pairs and then passed through three stages of phase buffers 108 before entering the sampling latches 110. Each phase rotator 106 is controlled by 54 lines from logic, which adjust the current weights for each phase contribution.
The receive phase buffers 108 consist of circuits which are designed to interface to the output drive sections (all phases) of the phase rotator circuit 106 while subjecting the phase rotator 106 to only light loading. The phase buffers 108 then drive from the Phase Rotator 106 to the sampling latches 110 while providing the required input drive necessary for the phase rotator circuit 106. It is preferred that the receive phase buffers 108 operate at a rate necessary for a half rate design. It is also preferred that the phase buffers 108 provide adequate rise and fall times taking into account the estimated net loading.
The receive phase buffers 108 may include any circuits that drive clocks from sources to circuits that have high capacitive loading due to wiring and/or gate loading. For the receive PLL 101, it is preferred that the phase buffers 108 allow equal loading on the individual delay stages, and the drive capability to fan out the clock phases from a single PLL to four transmit/receive cores. At the clock rates used in the present embodiment, phase buffers 108 are important in assuring reasonable rise and fall times, duty cycle, and jitter performance of system clocks.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention utilizes two phase buffer 108 circuit topologies. The first is a pseudo-differential positive feedback latching stage referred to as the latch buffer 180, shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The Phase Buffers 108 characteristics are measured primarily by power usage and jitter. In most cases, it is preferential to trade off increased power usage for better jitter performance. Table 6 illustrates jitter and power numbers for exemplary embodiments of the Phase Buffers 72 and 108. The simulated jitter numbers were based on power supply noise. For the transmit Phase Buffers 72, the noise level was 75 mVp-p. For the receive Phase Buffers 108, the noise level was 150 mVp-p. All numbers are for 2.5 Gbps operation, on a per link basis.
Referring now to
And with respect to the phase buffer circuits 108,
Block diagrams have also been provided to more clearly illustrate phase rotator 106 and phase buffer circuitry 108.
By repetition of the above sequence, any phase setting may be tuned in. Because this is a circular operation, the range of the output phase is not limited to the 0 to 360 degree interval. This allows a continuous variation of the phase and thereby a frequency adjustment. Due to the fact that the weighting factors are only changed by adding or subtracting one sub-factor element at a time, no glitches can occur.
A simplified schematic for a six-phase phase rotator 240 according to the present invention is provided in
While preferred embodiments of the invention has been described herein, variations in the design may be made, and such variations may be apparent to those skilled in the art of making tools, as well as to those skilled in other arts. The performance and signal specifications identified above are by no means the only specifications suitable for the method and system of the present invention, and substitute specifications will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art. The scope of the invention, therefore, is only to be limited by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/996,053, filed Nov. 28, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,993,107 B2, issued Jan. 31, 2006, which claims the benefits of provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/262,441, filed Jan. 16, 2001, for “Unilink Analog Architecture”. This application is related to the following copending applications, all of which are incorporated herein by reference: Ser. No. 09/996,113, filed Nov. 28,2001, for “Unified Digital Architecture”, now Pat. Ser. No. 6,970,529 B2. issued Nov, 29, 2005; Ser. No. 09/996,091, filed Nov. 28,2001, for “GLOBAL ARCHITECTURE FOR ADVANCED SERIAL LiNK” ; Ser. No. 09/997,587, filed Nov. 28, 2001, for “Apparatus And Method For Oversampling With Evenly Spaced Samples” ; Ser. No. 09/749,908, filed Dec. 29,2000, for “Programmable Driver/Equalizer with Alterable Analog Finite Impulse Response (FIR) Filter Having Low Intersymbol Interference & Constant Peak Amplitude Independent of Coefficient Settings” ; and Ser. No. 09/861,668, filed May 22,2001, by Schmatz for “Phase Rotator and Data Recovery Receiver Incorporating said Phase Rotator.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4918393 | Yokosuka et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5276661 | Beg | Jan 1994 | A |
5475707 | Ficarra et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5621755 | Bella et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5719867 | Borazjani | Feb 1998 | A |
5799048 | Farjad-Rad et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812594 | Rakib | Sep 1998 | A |
5825813 | Na | Oct 1998 | A |
5930231 | Miller et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6002717 | Gaudet | Dec 1999 | A |
6018275 | Perrett et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029324 | Wixforth | Feb 2000 | A |
6144708 | Maruyama | Nov 2000 | A |
6150890 | Damgaard et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160432 | Rhee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6236267 | Anzil | May 2001 | B1 |
6347126 | Nagayasu et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6389273 | Brandenburg | May 2002 | B1 |
6424192 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6462594 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480704 | Pakonen | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6522702 | Maruyama | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6614840 | Maruyama | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6624668 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643787 | Zerbe et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650720 | Grung et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6975687 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
20020041581 | Aramaki | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030001692 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040076192 | Zerbe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098634 | Zerbe et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040190669 | Gutierrez et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3707761 | Sep 1988 | DE |
4411876 | Oct 1994 | DE |
2000069102 | Mar 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060008042 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60262441 | Jan 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09996053 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 11225600 | US |