This invention relates generally to an anti-theft ring assembly and method for protecting consumer products from theft, and more particularly, to an improved anti-theft ring assembly for displaying a product in a manner which allows the product to be handled by a consumer while also reducing the likelihood of theft of the product.
Surveillance systems that prevent or deter theft of merchandise from retail stores are well known in the art. For example, retail stores often utilize electronic article surveillance (EAS) markers or tags that activate an alarm upon removal of the product from the store in order to discourage the theft of consumer products. These types of markers are typically secured to the product and are either removed or rendered inactive at checkout. In some cases the markers are visible to consumers, and in other cases the markers are hidden from view in order to prevent unauthorized removal. In either case, if the markers are not rendered inactive or removed, they will be sensed by the EAS system causing an alarm to signal, usually when exiting the retail store. The use of such markers or tags to trigger an alarm has been successful in deterring the theft of most types of merchandise. However, the use of such markers with certain types of merchandise has not always been successful due to the nature of the products to be tagged. For example, some products are inherently difficult to tag, either due to their size or ease of removal of the tag. One higher price item that is difficult to effectively attach an electronic sensor to is a ring. It can be difficult to attach sensors to the band or shank of a ring because if the sensors are overly rigid or cumbersome they can limit the customer's ability to try on the ring before purchasing. However, if the tag is easily removed it will not serve as a deterrent. Thus, tags to prevent theft are often attached to rings by using a thin, yet flexible, tear resistant plastic strap.
For example, one such tag is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,720,498. In the '498 patent the anti-theft tag includes an elongated housing that is attached to the ring by a tear resistant strap that is secured to an outer surface of the tag by a pressure sensitive adhesive. The tag is inserted within a ring display system that includes slots for receiving the body of the anti-theft tag. While generally effective, attaching the strap to the outside of a tag may allow a consumer to tamper with the attachment of the strap in an attempt to remove it.
Another such tag is U.S. Pat. No. 7,714,721, which is owned by the assignee of the present application. In the '721 patent the anti-theft tag includes an elongated housing for accommodating an EAS marker, a product support member that locks into the housing and which supports the ring, and a flexible, tear resistant strap for securing the ring to the support member, with the strap being disposed at least partially within the housing during use. In use, the tear resistant strap extends over the ring shank and the ends of the strap are received within the cavity of the housing in order to protect the strap from unauthorized removal by a consumer.
Alternately, anti-theft markers may be hidden in a holder displaying the product, for example by hiding an EAS marker in a display box for holding and displaying the ring. Although placing the marker in the holder displaying the product has also had some success, if the product is removed from the holder, it no longer has an anti-theft tag associated with it.
Thus, a person desiring to steal an item, such as an article of jewelry (for example a ring), will often simply remove the ring from its display box as they pretend to try on the ring. When the ring is removed from the box, the thief leaves behind any EAS marker contained in the box. In an attempt to deter the theft of expensive items of jewelry, some retailers lock the items behind display cases, and only remove them upon the request of the customer. This requires the retailer to take out each item of jewelry individually and stay with the customer as he or she handles the item, because upon removal from the locked case the item becomes vulnerable to theft, which is time consuming and cumbersome.
Although the aforementioned devices provide a level of security against theft of items such as rings, there is a continued need in the art for an improved anti-theft device, which can be used to display a product to a consumer, allow the consumer to handle the product in some manner (such as by trying on the product), while also deterring the theft of the product.
The anti-theft ring assembly of the present application includes a product engagement member including a display member that supports the ring during use and a securing member (for example a tear resistant tie or strap) that attaches the ring to the display member, and an anchoring device including a support member and a tether for securing the product engagement member to the support member while allowing removal of the product engagement member from a product display, for example a box.
In one embodiment, the display member includes a curved or arcuate support for supporting a circular shank portion of the ring and the tie is an adjustable cable tie, as is known in the art. The support may be a card that includes protrusions for connecting the tether thereto.
The anti-theft ring assembly described herein is tamper resistant, even when a consumer rotates or twists the ring, thus discouraging unauthorized removal of the ring. The anti-theft ring assembly also does not improperly interfere with a consumer trying on the ring, is readily attached to the ring and is aesthetically pleasing. The features of the anti-theft tag as described herein may be used with any of a variety of rings, and may be supported on a variety of display devices as discussed below.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages will be apparent from the following description of particular embodiments, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles disclosed herein.
The embodiments disclosed herein relate to an anti-theft assembly for use with a product, for example a ring. As used herein, the term “ring” refers to any jewelry item having a generally circular shank, including but not limited to finger rings, toe rings, earrings and bellybutton rings. As also used herein, the term “electronic article surveillance” (EAS) tag, sensor, label or marker refers to any conventionally available article surveillance sensor that triggers an alarm if not detached or disarmed before the product is removed from a designated area, such as a store, as is known in the art. Although referred to as “electronic”, EAS sensors as used herein include and sensor that triggers an alarm if not deactivated, disarmed, or removed, including, but not limited to conventional electronic sensors such as acousto-magnetic (A/M) sensors, magnetic sensors, radio-frequency (RF) sensors, and the like, as would be known to those of skill in the art.
Referring initially to
The product engagement member 14 of anti-theft ring assembly 10 includes a display member 20 that supports the ring 12 during use and a securing member 22 that attaches the ring 12 to the display member 20. In the present embodiment, the display member 20 includes a seat 24. Referring now to
If a conventional-style cable tie is utilized, the strap 28 may include a plurality of teeth 32 that engage a pawl supported within the head 30. In use, the pawl rides up the slope of the teeth 32 when the tail 28a is inserted in a first direction into opening 30a within head 30. The pawl engages the backside of the teeth 32 upon movement of the strap 28 in a second direction to prevent removal of the strap 28 from the head 30. The pawl and teeth allow the strap 28 to be adjusted around the shank 12a so that the strap can be tightened around the shank, but not loosened, i.e. the strap 28 can only be moved in one direction within the head 30, to tighten the strap, as is known in the art. Thus, each pull of the strap 30 tightens the strap around the shank 12a in an irreversible manner so that the strap 28 cannot be pulled back and loosened. The strap 28 may also rest within an indentation or recess 34 in seat 24 (
Referring now to
In the present embodiment, support member 36 is sized to fit within base 18a of box 18, for example within an opening 18f in base 18a (
Use of the anti-theft tag ring assembly will now be explained with reference to FIGS. 8 and 11-18.
In use, tether 38 is looped or wound around posts and protrusions 40a-c of support member 36 to secure the tether to the support member. The tether 38 is also received within slot 26 of seat 24 to attach the tether to the product engagement member 14. The support member 36 is secured to or within the base of box 18 at any point during the assembly process, for example by the use of adhesive or other fastening methods. Once the tether is engaged with the support member 36 and the seat 24, the product, i.e. ring 12 can be secured to the seat 24. As best shown in
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, the materials disclosed herein may be readily changed, as may the dimensions and geometric configurations of the components described herein, i.e. the box can have other, the support member can have on or more posts, etc. Also, the anti-theft ring assembly may find use with items other than a box as disclosed herein for example a display card. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope, spirit and intent of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3668681 | Kaplan | Jun 1972 | A |
4074637 | Lorenzen, Jr. | Feb 1978 | A |
4300674 | Davet | Nov 1981 | A |
5437172 | Lamy et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
D363087 | McAuley | Oct 1995 | S |
5535878 | Reed | Jul 1996 | A |
D379100 | McAuley et al. | May 1997 | S |
D385579 | McAuley et al. | Oct 1997 | S |
5709110 | Greenfield et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5720498 | McAuley et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6006899 | McAuley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6199309 | Markarian | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6476717 | Gross et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
7360379 | Lopez | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7714721 | Feibelman et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7971845 | Galant | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8044806 | Sayegh | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8558688 | Henson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8590699 | Feibelman et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20020134119 | Derman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030010070 | Kolton et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040145473 | Royer | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20080034815 | Fawcett et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20110080137 | Avganim | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110187531 | Oehl et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110283754 | Ezzo et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120042702 | Ezzo et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120119910 | Belden et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120255331 | Markarian, Jr. | Oct 2012 | A1 |