The present disclosure relates to storm resistant components and residential or commercial structures enhanced to resist the damaging forces imposed by storm winds, storm rains, torsion forces, and seismic events.
This section provides background information related to the present disclosure which is not necessarily prior art.
It is well known that hurricanes and tornados create storm wind forces capable of damaging and/or destroying standard residential and commercial constructions. Wind storm forces are known to remove and/or compromise the primary sealing systems of shingles, roofing, siding, and veneers. Furthermore, wind storm forces are well known to lift off entire roof systems and blow down and/or suck out walls.
The winds associated with tornado and hurricane storms are known to include destructive straight line winds and other destructive forces that impose torsion forces upon a structure to effectively twist it apart. In addition, tornado and hurricane storms buffet structures with seismic type forces that effectively weaken the holding power of traditional fasteners like nails and screws. Furthermore, tornado storms include a vortex, and sometimes several smaller vortices inside of a large vortex, which impose a spiraling shell of wind capable of imposing an effective dynamic wall of wind known to apply impact forces to a structure, capable of effectively bumping and/or knocking it down, not just blowing it down.
Observations of tornado storm events suggest that a vortex travels while spinning in an unorthodox, unpredictable, and indefinable warble-like pattern and/or path. The warble-like pattern of movement relative to the ground gives the spinning wind wall impact like force acting on a structure as it whips around with sudden changes of direction. As a result, frame-type structures usually suffer significant damage from direct hits by a tornado, regardless of the size or classification of the storm.
In addition, wind storm forces are well known to impose substantial blowing rain events which become influent to structures even before the construction components fail and/or are compromised. Beyond the obvious influent opportunities resulting from broken windows and/or other compromised construction components, wind storm events are known to blow rain into and through functioning vents of an intact roof system, thus creating water damage even though little or no actual structural damage occurs.
In addition to wind and rain hazards, severe wind events impose seismic forces upon buildings, not unlike the seismic forces imposed by an earthquake. One of the reasons that frame-type buildings seem to explode apart is partly because the fasteners, which are traditionally nails and/or screws, significantly weakened lose their holding power when subjected to seismic forces. As a result, once the holding power of traditional nails and screws is compromised, subsequent applied forces of wind, rain, torsion, and/or seismic in nature, can have significant destructive impact upon a structure.
There are numerous representatives of known art resident in the patent records that deal with various hurricane or tornado storm wind forces by claiming use of any one of several strengthening components. However, one of the major problems with all of the known examples is that they do not lend themselves to our do-it-yourself culture and do not lend themselves to be cost effective for the mass consumption public at large.
Another problem with known art examples is that none of these patent records for structural strengthening systems includes a means to provide a secondary sealing system for the structure in the event the primary sealing system of shingles and/or siding of the structure are compromised.
Another problem with the known art examples is that none of these patent records for structural strengthening systems includes a means to provide anti-torsion and seismic resistance to the construction system by unitizing the basic frame-type construction elements.
There are some references of known art in the patent records related to systems that minimize water influent damage from wind storms but, once again, none of these examples lend themselves to our do-it-yourself culture and do not lend themselves to be cost effective for the mass consumption public at large. In addition, none of the known examples provide any strengthening enhancements to improve the structural integrity of frame-type construction to resist the destructive torsion forces imposed by wind storms or the destructive seismic forces imposed by wind storms and other seismic events. Furthermore, none of these prior art sealing systems provides a secondary sealing system in the event that the primary sealing system is compromised.
This section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
The subject invention overcomes well-known problems in such a way that those skilled in the art will readily recognize and appreciate. Furthermore, the present disclosure provides features and capabilities for many other applications beyond the preferred embodiments disclosed, which those skilled in the art will readily recognize also embody the spirit of the subject invention.
One preferred embodiment of the subject invention relates to a typical residential stick-built or prefabricated home construction which is enhanced and substantially strengthened in specific areas of the structure to better withstand the destructive wind forces of hurricanes and tornados, as imposed in the form of straight line winds, torsion forces, and/or seismic forces. One preferred embodiment also provides a secondary watertight seal which is utilized to maintain a reasonable barrier from influent storm water and blowing rain in the event that the primary water barrier via the shingles and/or siding is compromised during the storm.
It is understood that the secondary water seal requires that the structure must maintain a reasonable structural integrity; therefore, a series of structural enhancements are employed for this purpose and to further maintain structural integrity against storm wind forces. The structural enhancement system is comprised of several subsystems which all work together to collectively enhance the structural integrity of the structure. These subsystems include but are not limited to the following:
Those skilled in the art will readily understand that while many typical structures will require all of the listed subsystems to enhance the structure adequately against severe storm winds, some complex structures may require additional specialized subsystems, while less complex structures may only require a partial list of the subsystems. A brief description of each subsystem follows.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
Corresponding reference numerals indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The present disclosure and rafter/joist tie-down system 66 is able to enhance standard roof construction that exploits the known research and yet still provides some enhancements for other roof constructions that do not conform to the prior art research for best storm construction. The subject invention effectively unitizes the entire roof system by employing the features of the rafter/joist tie-down system 66 to cooperate and integrate with the respective features of the wall reinforcement system 34 and a wind-beam system 80 (shown and described in reference to
Referring to
The wind-beam system 80 effectively reinforces roof rafters 52 and/or trusses 98 together with strong and securely fastened members such as the wind-beam chord connector 92, wind-beam extension 94, and wind-beam ridge connector 96, which effectively unitizes the entire roof system together to act more as a unit than as individual roof components. The wind-beam system 80 works on traditional rafter systems and/or traditional truss systems. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the steeper the roof pitch, the greater the lift forces on the leeward side, and thus the stronger the wind-beam system 80 effectively needs to be, all things being equal. The subject invention effectively unitizes the entire roof system by employing the features of the wind-beam system 80 to cooperate and integrate with the respective features of the rafter/joist tie-down system 66 and the roof decking system 82, the venting system 84, the diaphragm reinforcement system 70, and/or the safe room system 72.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
One preferred embodiment of the lineup blocking 124 features a bracket 128 which can be either preassembled to the ends of the lineup block 124 or installed after the lineup block 124 is installed. The bracket 128 provides additional ease of assembly and additional structural integrity to the rafters 50 and decking 114. Another preferred application of the subject invention employs the respective features of a watertight membrane 130 placed over the decking 114 and/or the watertight seal tape 116 covering over the mating edges of adjacent sheets of decking 114, including ridges and valleys.
Referring to
Referring to
The subject invention overcomes the problems associated with these diaphragms by employing the diaphragm reinforcement system 70. One preferred embodiment of the diaphragm reinforcement system 70 features a pearling brace 144 spanning transverse across the gable end 132. The pearling brace 144 in one preferred embodiment provides a series of specialized brackets 146 which cooperate with standard wood components to enhance the structural integrity of the gable end plane 136. In another preferred pearling embodiment, a structural metal beam 148 and associated brackets span transversely across the gable end 132 to enhance the structural integrity of the gable end plane 136. Another preferred embodiment of the diaphragm reinforcement system 70 features a series of joist brace elements 150 spanning transversely across the array of juxtaposed joists 52 so as to enhance the structural integrity of the joist array to prevent them from being negatively affected by storm force winds.
The joist brace elements 150 are firmly affixed to the joist 52 such that the joist 52 is not only prevented from suffering detrimental joist plane 138 deformation but also preventing detrimental ceiling plane 140 deformation. The joist brace elements 150 are firmly anchored to specialized gable end brackets 152 at the gable end 132 which in turn are directly anchored to the wall reinforcement system 34 components, which in turn anchor the entire construction to the foundation elements. The joist brace elements 150 also include strut elements 154 attaching at one end to the joist brace elements 150 and then spanning at a bias angle α up to a connection point 156 on the pearling brace 144. The strut 154 forms the hypotenuse of a triangle comprised of the strut 154, the gable end plane 136, and a joist brace 158 element, which subsequently forms an enhanced structural means to impart structural integrity to the diaphragms aforementioned which were previously unattainable prior to the subject invention. One or more joist brace brackets 160 which connect the joist brace 158 to the joists 52 also define members of the joist brace elements 150.
With continuing reference to
Referring to
A significant problem that basically all known external access venting systems suffer is that they are susceptible to being damaged and/or completely removed during blowing rain in wind storm conditions, which lead to water leaks and subsequent damage. Another significant problem that basically all prior art external access venting systems suffer is that, even if they manage to stay intact during the wind storm conditions, they are further susceptible to allowing blowing rain in wind storm conditions to pass through them and into the roof space, which leads to water leaks and subsequent damage. Therefore, one preferred embodiment of the venting system 84 of the subject invention provides specialized external venting devices for influent and effluent air handling which are able to remain firmly and functionally intact and at the same time control and mitigate blowing rain during wind storm conditions such that water is channeled and/or redirected and/or drained back out of the structure, preventing damaging accumulation inside the structure.
Another preferred embodiment of the subject invention eliminates all external access vents so as to eliminate the problems with any such locations and/or associated venting devices, and replaces them with the small, appropriately sized internal access vents 162 directly connecting the conditioned portion of the structure to the roof space to slightly “condition” the air in the roof space. There is, therefore, no external access vents communicating between the internal conditioned portion of the building structure to ambient air outside the building structure. The conditioned air in the roof space 166 is both appropriately cooled and/or heated in conjunction with the seasons of the year to maintain a moderate temperature range in the roof space 166. The conditioned air in the roof space 166 is further enabled by having no influent or effluent outside air to influence the roof space 166; however, an efficient insulation sealing system, such as the closed cell spray foam 168, is applied to the entire underside of the roof construction to fill in between the rafters 50 to provide an air and water seal to prevent air and water from penetrating the roof construction into the roof space 166. The closed cell spray foam 168 insulation also covers and seals any fasteners of the decking 114 or shingles 172 or other exterior construction that might have penetrated through the decking 114 and into the roof space 166, such that any chance of becoming a future leak path is prevented. The closed cell spray foam 168 insulation also covers walls 174 of the gable ends 132 in the same manner. The subject invention effectively cooperates with a unitized roof construction by employing the venting system 84 to cooperate and integrate with the respective features of the roof decking system 82, the wind beam system 80, the rafter/joist tie-down system 66, and the diaphragm reinforcement system 70.
Referring to
Referring to
Another preferred embodiment of the storm safe room system 72 includes an independent unitized roof 198, reinforced walls 200, and the storm door 192 which opens inward. The door features enhanced hinges 202 and locking and security components 204 to ensure closure in the event it is subjected to storm force winds, flying debris, and/or influent water. The storm safe room system 72 provides the independent fresh air vent 194 and the reinforced door 192 to prevent it from opening except at the command of the occupant and provides a watertight seal 206 to prevent influent water. The storm safe room system 72 provides a storm room suitable of being used as a dual purpose room, such as a closet, pantry, bathroom, or the like. One preferred embodiment of the subject invention features a storm safe room system 72 constructed on-site using appropriate enhanced components.
The subject invention effectively establishes a unitized storm safe room system 72 by cooperating and integrating with the respective features of the anchor system 10, the wall reinforcement system 34, the rafter/joist tie-down system 66, the window/door protective seal system 112, the roof decking system 82, the venting system 84, the wind-beam system 80, the diaphragm reinforcement system 70, and the wall sheeting system 68.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Lateral brace 215 is fitted with single-clevis attachment brackets 222 positioned to cooperate with joist elements 52 so as to establish and maintain parallel spacing of joist elements 52. When wind and torsion forces are imposed upon a frame type construction, the joists 52 are susceptible to flexing and shifting out of position. As a result, sheeting such as sheetrock attached to the interior room side of joist 52 can be compromised and damaged. The present disclosure provides improved structural integrity for joists 52 by maintaining parallel position and resisting shifting movement of joists 52 in response to wind and torsion forces, while also preventing a plane of the ceiling from being compromised.
Prefabricated horizontal brace 213 is bolted to vertical studs 219 along its length and bolted at ends 218 to truss 212. This bolted system effectively unitizes the entire gable-end truss thereby resisting wind and torsion forces imposed upon it, as well as preventing a plane of the gable from being blown in or sucked out. A first angled prefabricated brace 214 is attached to prefabricated lateral brace 215 using a double-clevis bracket 126. In large gable installations, a second or third bracing system may be required to adequately resist damaging forces. In such installations, a second prefabricated angle brace 214 can be attached to either the prefabricated lateral brace 215 or to a first installed angle brace 214 by using double-clevis attachment bracket 216. Enhanced diaphragm enhancement system 220 includes a fastening point where prefabricated lateral brace 215 is fastened to bottom chord of truss 212 using a specialized anti-hinge bracket 217.
Referring to
An anti-hinge bracket 217 is fastened to prefabricated lateral brace 215 and bolted in multiple locations to bottom truss chord 221. Mounting holes in anti-hinge bracket 217 are positioned straddling lateral brace 215 which provide improved enhancement strength and structural integrity for the gable-end truss to prevent the truss from collapsing and/or being sucked out from wind and/or torsion forces. Additional mounting holes in anti-hinge bracket 217 cooperate and align with anti-torsion tension-compression columns by bolting down through the double top plate 44 with fasteners 236 and bolting directly to the structural columns 18, which tie directly to foundational elements. In traditional gable-end truss construction, destructive forces can collapse a gable-end truss by effectively hinging it over where the bottom chord 221 mates with double top plate 44. The present disclosure overcomes this problem by combining the unitized benefits and support of enhanced diaphragm system 220 which includes at least one anti-hinge bracket 217.
Referring to
Lateral corner brace subassemblies 223 are appropriately installed straddling building corners as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
The present disclosure significantly enhances the structural integrity of a framed construction with the installation of subassemblies 223 at each corner and the diaphragm enhancement assembly 220. In addition to these enhancements, the present disclosure includes the integration and benefits of the anchoring system (not shown) and the line of compression blocking (described in reference to
The present disclosure further incorporates the benefits of a secondary sealing system to maintain an integral seal in the event that exterior cosmetic and primary sealing systems are compromised during storm events.
The present disclosure further incorporates the features of an entire unitized structural enhancement system to combine with a unitized safe-room to provide maximum protection from the storm events.
The present disclosure provides an improved system for a typical residential or commercial structure wherein a series of specialized components are integrated together so as to enhance the structural integrity of the structure against wind forces, such as those associated with hurricanes and/or tornados, so as to provide a secondary relatively watertight seal for the structure, even in the event that the primary sealing system of shingles and/or siding is compromised, damaged, or removed by the storm winds. As a result, known shingles and siding provide a cosmetic covering and a primary water seal for the structure; however, the present disclosure provides a secondary water seal in the event that the primary seal system is compromised during storm wind exposure.
The present disclosure further provides structural enhancements that can be applied to new construction as well as retrofitting existing structures so as to improve structural integrity and secondary sealing against wind and seismic forces such as those associated with hurricanes and/or tornados. The present disclosure further provides structural enhancements that cooperate with standard construction components so as to improve the structural integrity of the construction components beyond their original capabilities against wind and seismic forces, such as those associated with hurricanes and/or tornados, and further to provide a secondary sealing system to resist influent water in the event that the primary sealing system is compromised.
The typical preferred embodiment construction material for the structural enhanced components of the subject invention is metal. Said components may be manufactured from metal using any one of several typical methods such as stamping, forging, bending, welding, or combinations of fabrication methods. In addition, said components may be manufactured from non-metal materials such as plastic, reinforced plastic, fiberglass, composites, and/or any other appropriate technology materials suitable to provide the strength requirements for a given application.
The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the disclosure, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/613,441, filed on Sep. 13, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/685,793, filed on Mar. 26, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/573,943, filed on Sep. 15, 2011. The entire disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3305989 | Scott | Feb 1967 | A |
3668828 | Nicholas et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3755982 | Schmidt | Sep 1973 | A |
3785108 | Satchell | Jan 1974 | A |
3902280 | Spoar et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3963210 | Macklin | Jun 1976 | A |
3964268 | DiPeri | Jun 1976 | A |
4073103 | McClure | Feb 1978 | A |
4198175 | Knepp et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4321776 | Delight | Mar 1982 | A |
4420913 | Long et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4455792 | Pasco | Jun 1984 | A |
4872298 | Klemic | Oct 1989 | A |
4875314 | Boilen | Oct 1989 | A |
4890436 | Colonias | Jan 1990 | A |
4982545 | Stromback | Jan 1991 | A |
5050364 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5060436 | Delgado | Oct 1991 | A |
5240224 | Adams | Aug 1993 | A |
5317850 | Colonias et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327699 | Khan et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5349800 | Peng | Sep 1994 | A |
5384993 | Phillips | Jan 1995 | A |
5388804 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5448861 | Lawson | Sep 1995 | A |
5487244 | Hill | Jan 1996 | A |
5491935 | Coxum | Feb 1996 | A |
5699639 | Fernandez | Dec 1997 | A |
5836132 | Weathersby | Nov 1998 | A |
5881501 | Guffey et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6003271 | Boyer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014843 | Crumley et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6065730 | Marks et al. | May 2000 | A |
6161339 | Cornett et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6256960 | Babcock et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6332299 | Stewart, III | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347916 | Ramirez | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6367205 | Cornett, Sr. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6430881 | Daudet et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6691488 | Branson | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6763634 | Thompson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6922968 | Behlen | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7103984 | Kastberg | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7140155 | Nasimov | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7150132 | Commins | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174689 | Alyea et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7200972 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7398620 | Jones | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7445192 | Gridley et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7448172 | Knodel | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7788878 | diGirolamo et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7891110 | Diaz | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7971411 | Commins | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8046966 | Moore et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065846 | McDonald et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8091291 | Ode | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20030024174 | Bonds et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030182875 | Hill | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040049993 | Saldana | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050086888 | Moore et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060254166 | Michels et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254167 | Antonic | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070094992 | Antonic | May 2007 | A1 |
20100236158 | Carbonaro | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20130067839 | Zimmerman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
04327627 | Nov 1992 | JP |
06-306944 | Nov 1994 | JP |
2009-293214 | Dec 2009 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/055809 mailed Feb. 21, 2013. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2012/055809 mailed Feb. 21, 2013. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/033936 mailed Jul. 18, 2013. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2013/033936 mailed Jul. 18, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130247485 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61685793 | Mar 2012 | US | |
61573943 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13613441 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 13850984 | US |