Patent Application
20120177651
Antibodies are well known for use in therapeutic applications.
Antibodies are heteromultimeric glycoproteins comprising at least two heavy and two light chains. Aside from IgM, intact antibodies are usually heterotetrameric glycoproteins of approximately 150 Kda, composed of two identical light (L) chains and two identical heavy (H) chains. Typically, each light chain is linked to a heavy chain by one covalent disulfide bond while the number of disulfide linkages between the heavy chains of different immunoglobulin isotypes varies. Each heavy and light chain also has intrachain disulfide bridges. Each heavy chain has at one end a variable domain (VH) followed by a number of constant regions. Each light chain has a variable domain (VL) and a constant region at its other end; the constant region of the light chain is aligned with the first constant region of the heavy chain and the light chain variable domain is aligned with the variable domain of the heavy chain. The light chains of antibodies from most vertebrate species can be assigned to one of two types called Kappa and Lambda based on the amino acid sequence of the constant region. Depending on the amino acid sequence of the constant region of their heavy chains, human antibodies can be assigned to five different classes, IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG and IgM. IgG and IgA can be further subdivided into subclasses, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4; and IgA1 and IgA2. Species variants exist with mouse and rat having at least IgG2a, IgG2b. The variable domain of the antibody confers binding specificity upon the antibody with certain regions displaying particular variability called complementarity determining regions (CDRs). The more conserved portions of the variable region are called Framework regions (FR). The variable domains of intact heavy and light chains each comprise four FR connected by three CDRs. The CDRs in each chain are held together in close proximity by the FR regions and with the CDRs from the other chain contribute to the formation of the antigen-binding site of antibodies. The constant regions are not directly involved in the binding of the antibody to the antigen but exhibit various effector functions such as participation in antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), phagocytosis via binding to Fcγ receptor, half-life/clearance rate via neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) and complement dependent cytotoxicity via the C1q component of the complement cascade.
The nature of the structure of an IgG antibody is such that there are two antigen-binding sites, both of which are specific for the same epitope. They are therefore, monospecific.
A bispecific antibody is an antibody having binding specificities for at least two different epitopes. Methods of making such antibodies are known in the art. Traditionally, the recombinant production of bispecific antibodies is based on the coexpression of two immunoglobulin H chain-L chain pairs, where the two H chains have different binding specificities see Millstein et al, Nature 305 537-539 (1983), WO93/08829 and Traunecker et al EMBO, 10, 1991, 3655-3659. Because of the random assortment of H and L chains, a potential mixture of ten different antibody structures are produced of which only one has the desired binding specificity. An alternative approach involves fusing the variable domains with the desired binding specificities to heavy chain constant region comprising at least part of the hinge region, CH2 and CH3 regions. It is preferred to have the CH1 region containing the site necessary for light chain binding present in at least one of the fusions. DNA encoding these fusions, and if desired the L chain are inserted into separate expression vectors and are then cotransfected into a suitable host organism. It is possible though to insert the coding sequences for two or all three chains into one expression vector. In one approach, a bispecific antibody is composed of a H chain with a first binding specificity in one arm and a H-L chain pair, providing a second binding specificity in the other arm, see WO94/04690. Also see Suresh et al Methods in Enzymology 121, 210, 1986. Other approaches include antibody molecules which comprise single domain binding sites which is set out in WO2007/095338.
HGF (Hepatocyte Growth Factor or Scatter Factor, SF) is a pleiotropic cytokine that, together with its receptor MET (Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition factor, also known as c-MET or Hepatocyte Growth Factor receptor), is able to convey in cells a unique combination of pro-migratory, anti-apoptoic and pro-mitogenic signals. Native to most tissues, HGF is expressed by cells of mesenchymal origin and is localized within the extracellular matrix where it remains in its inactive (pro-HGF) form until cleaved by proteases. Under normal physiological conditions this occurs in response to tissue injury or during embryonic development. MET is expressed by cells of epithelial origin and, consistent with their tissue localization, the effects of HGF/MET signal transduction are important in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, cell mobilization, migration and rapid cell divisions that are essential for tissue repair in the adult and organogenesis in the embryo. Activation of HGF/MET signalling coordinates a wide array of cellular processes including, proliferation, scattering/migration, induction of cell polarity and angiogenesis, where the effects are dependent on cell type and environment. In the adult animal, the pathway is relatively quiescent although it is integral to processes such as liver regeneration, repair to kidney damage, skin healing and intestinal injury where a coordinated process of invasive growth, mediated by HGF/MET signalling in cells at the wound edge, is essential for restoration of tissue integrity. Whilst regulated HGF/MET, together coordinated genetic programmes that orchestrate embryonic development and tissue morphogenesis, are essential features of normal physiology, unregulated HGF/MET expression in cancer cells is a key feature of neoplastic dissemination of tumours. This unregulated expression can occur as a result of activating mutations, genomic amplification, transcriptional upregulation and paracrine or autocrine activation. Indeed, it has been shown that propagation of HGF/MET-dependent invasive growth signals is a general feature of highly aggressive tumours that can yield cells which migrate and infiltrate adjacent tissues and establish metastatic lesions at sites distal to the primary tumour. Coupled with the fact that HGF is a potent angiogenic factor and that MET is known to be expressed by endothelial cells, therapeutic targeting of HGF/MET has considerable potential to inhibit cancer onset, tumour progression and metastasis.
The Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) family of growth factors and their receptors are essential regulators of angiogenesis and vascular permeability. The VEGF family comprises VEGF-A, PlGF (placenta growth factor), VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-E and snake venom VEGF and each is thought to have a distinct role in vascular patterning and vessel development. Due to alternative splicing of mRNA transcribed from a single 8-exon gene, VEGF-A has at least 9 subtypes (isoforms) identified by the number of amino acids remaining after signal peptide cleavage. For example, in humans the most prominent isoform is VEGF165, which exists in equilibrium between a soluble and cell associated form. Longer isoforms (VEGF183, VEGF189& VEGF206) possess C-terminal regions that are highly positively charged and mediate association with cell surface glycans and heparin that modulates their bioavailability. All VEGF-A isoforms form homodimers with the association occurring via a core of approximately 110 N-terminal residues that constitutes the receptor-binding VEGF fragment. Under normal circumstances, and in the centre of solid tumours, expression of VEGF is principally mediated by hypoxic conditions, signifying a shortage of vascular supply. The hypoxia causes dimerization of the hypoxia inducible factor HIF-1α with the constitutively expressed HIF-1α, forming a transcription factor that binds to hypoxic response elements in the promoter region of the VEGF gene. Under normoxia, the HIF-1α protein undergoes ubiquitin-mediated degradation as a consequence of multiple proline hydroxylation events. Other tumour-associated VEGF up-regulation occurs due to activation via oncogene pathways (i.e. ras) via inflammatory cytokines & growth factors as well as by mechanical forces.
The active VEGF homodimer is bound at the cell surface by receptors of the VEGFR family. The principal vascular endothelium associated receptors for VEGF-A are VEGFR1 (Flt1) and VEGFR2 (Flk-2; KDR). Both receptors are members of the tyrosine kinase family and require ligand-mediated dimerization for activation. Upon dimerization the kinase domains undergo autophosphorylation, although the extent of the kinase activity in VEGFR2 is greater than that in VEGFR1. It has been demonstrated that the angiogenic signalling of VEGF is mediated largely through VEGFR2, although the affinity of VEGF is approximately 3-fold greater for VEGFR1 (KD ˜30 pM compared with 100 pM for VEGFR2). This has led to the proposal that VEGFR1 principally acts as a decoy receptor to sequester VEGF and moderate the extent of VEGFR2 activation. Although VEGFR1 expression is associated with some tumours, its principal role appears to be during embryonic development & organogenesis. VEGF-A165 is also bound by the neuropilin receptors NRP1 & NRP2. Although these receptors lack TK domains, they are believed to acts as co-receptors for VEGFR2 and augment signalling by transferring the VEGF to the VEGFR2.
Numerous studies have helped confirm VEGF-A as a key factor in tumour angiogenesis. For example VEGF-A is expressed in most tumours and in tumour associated stroma. In the absence of a well developed and expanding vasculature system to support growth, tumour cells become necrotic and apoptotic thereby imposing a limit to the increase in tumour volume (of the order 1 mm3) that can result from continuous cell proliferation. The expression of VEGF-A is highest in hypoxic tumour cells adjacent to necrotic areas indicating that the induction of VEGF-A by hypoxia in growing tumours can change the balance of activators and inhibitors of angiogenesis, leading to the growth of new blood vessels in the tumour. Consistent with this hypothesis, a number of approaches, including small-molecular weight tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, antisense oligonucleotides etc., that inhibit or capture either VEGF-A or block its signalling receptor, VEGFR-2, have been developed as therapeutic agents.
The present invention relates to the combination of a HGF antagonist and a VEGF antagonist for use in therapy.
The present invention in particular relates to an antigen-binding protein comprising a protein scaffold which is linked to one or more epitope-binding domains wherein the antigen-binding protein has at least two antigen-binding sites at least one of which is from an epitope binding domain and at least one of which is from a paired VH/VL domain, and wherein at least one of the antigen-binding sites binds to HGF.
The present invention further provides an antigen-binding protein comprising a protein scaffold which is linked to one or more epitope-binding domains wherein the antigen-binding protein has at least two antigen-binding sites at least one of which is from an epitope binding domain and at least one of which is from a paired VH/VL domain, and wherein at least one of the antigen-binding sites binds to HGF and at least one of the antigen-binding sites binds to VEGF.
The invention also provides a polynucleotide sequence encoding a heavy chain of any of the antigen-binding proteins described herein, and a polynucleotide encoding a light chain of any of the antigen-binding proteins described herein. Such polynucleotides represent the coding sequence which corresponds to the equivalent polypeptide sequences, however it will be understood that such polynucleotide sequences could be cloned into an expression vector along with a start codon, an appropriate signal sequence and a stop codon.
The invention also provides a recombinant transformed or transfected host cell comprising one or more polynucleotides encoding a heavy chain and a light chain of any of the antigen-binding proteins described herein.
The invention further provides a method for the production of any of the antigen-binding proteins described herein which method comprises the step of culturing a host cell comprising a first and second vector, said first vector comprising a polynucleotide encoding a heavy chain of any of the antigen-binding proteins described herein and said second vector comprising a polynucleotide encoding a light chain of any of the antigen-binding proteins described herein, in a suitable culture media, for example serum-free culture media.
The invention further provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising an antigen-binding protein as described herein a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
The term ‘Protein Scaffold’ as used herein includes but is not limited to an immunoglobulin (Ig) scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, which may be a four chain or two chain antibody, or which may comprise only the Fc region of an antibody, or which may comprise one or more constant regions from an antibody, which constant regions may be of human or primate origin, or which may be an artificial chimera of human and primate constant regions. Such protein scaffolds may comprise antigen-binding sites in addition to the one or more constant regions, for example where the protein scaffold comprises a full IgG. Such protein scaffolds will be capable of being linked to other protein domains, for example protein domains which have antigen-binding sites, for example epitope-binding domains or ScFv domains.
A “domain” is a folded protein structure which has tertiary structure independent of the rest of the protein. Generally, domains are responsible for discrete functional properties of proteins and in many cases may be added, removed or transferred to other proteins without loss of function of the remainder of the protein and/or of the domain. An “antibody single variable domain” is a folded polypeptide domain comprising sequences characteristic of antibody variable domains. It therefore includes complete antibody variable domains and modified variable domains, for example, in which one or more loops have been replaced by sequences which are not characteristic of antibody variable domains, or antibody variable domains which have been truncated or comprise N- or C-terminal extensions, as well as folded fragments of variable domains which retain at least the binding activity and specificity of the full-length domain.
The phrase “immunoglobulin single variable domain” refers to an antibody variable domain (VH, VHH, VL) that specifically binds an antigen or epitope independently of a different V region or domain. An immunoglobulin single variable domain can be present in a format (e.g., homo- or hetero-multimer) with other, different variable regions or variable domains where the other regions or domains are not required for antigen binding by the single immunoglobulin variable domain (i.e., where the immunoglobulin single variable domain binds antigen independently of the additional variable domains). A “domain antibody” or “dAb” is the same as an “immunoglobulin single variable domain” which is capable of binding to an antigen as the term is used herein. An immunoglobulin single variable domain may be a human antibody variable domain, but also includes single antibody variable domains from other species such as rodent (for example, as disclosed in WO 00/29004), nurse shark and Camelid VHH dAbs. Camelid VHH are immunoglobulin single variable domain polypeptides that are derived from species including camel, llama, alpaca, dromedary, and guanaco, which produce heavy chain antibodies naturally devoid of light chains. Such VHH domains may be humanized according to standard techniques available in the art, and such domains are still considered to be “domain antibodies” according to the invention. As used herein “VH includes camelid VHH domains. NARV are another type of immunoglobulin single variable domain which were identified in cartilaginous fish including the nurse shark. These domains are also known as Novel Antigen Receptor variable region (commonly abbreviated to V(NAR) or NARV). For further details see Mol. Immunol. 44, 656-665 (2006) and US20050043519A.
The term “Epitope-binding domain” refers to a domain that specifically binds an antigen or epitope independently of a different V region or domain, this may be a immunoglobulin single variable domain, for example a human, camelid or shark immunoglobulin single variable domain or it may be a domain which is a derivative of a non-Immunoglobulin scaffold selected from the group consisting of CTLA-4 (Evibody); lipocalin; Protein A derived molecules such as Z-domain of Protein A (Affibody, SpA), A-domain (Avimer/Maxibody); Heat shock proteins such as GroEI and GroES; transferrin (trans-body); ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin); peptide aptamer; C-type lectin domain (Tetranectin); human γ-crystallin and human ubiquitin (affilins); PDZ domains; scorpion toxinkunitz type domains of human protease inhibitors; and fibronectin (adnectin); which has been subjected to protein engineering in order to obtain binding to a ligand other than its natural ligand.
CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-associated Antigen 4) is a CD28-family receptor expressed on mainly CD4+ T-cells. Its extracellular domain has a variable domain-like Ig fold. Loops corresponding to CDRs of antibodies can be substituted with heterologous sequence to confer different binding properties. CTLA-4 molecules engineered to have different binding specificities are also known as Evibodies. For further details see Journal of Immunological Methods 248 (1-2), 31-45 (2001)
Lipocalins are a family of extracellular proteins which transport small hydrophobic molecules such as steroids, bilins, retinoids and lipids. They have a rigid β-sheet secondary structure with a numer of loops at the open end of the conical structure which can be engineered to bind to different target antigens. Anticalins are between 160-180 amino acids in size, and are derived from lipocalins. For further details see Biochim Biophys Acta 1482: 337-350 (2000), U.S. Pat. No. 7,250,297B1 and US20070224633
An affibody is a scaffold derived from Protein A of Staphylococcus aureus which can be engineered to bind to antigen. The domain consists of a three-helical bundle of approximately 58 amino acids. Libraries have been generated by randomization of surface residues. For further details see Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 17, 455-462 (2004) and EP1641818A1
Avimers are multidomain proteins derived from the A-domain scaffold family. The native domains of approximately 35 amino acids adopt a defined disulphide bonded structure. Diversity is generated by shuffling of the natural variation exhibited by the family of A-domains. For further details see Nature Biotechnology 23(12), 1556-1561 (2005) and Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 16(6), 909-917 (June 2007)
A transferrin is a monomeric serum transport glycoprotein. Transferrins can be engineered to bind different target antigens by insertion of peptide sequences in a permissive surface loop. Examples of engineered transferrin scaffolds include the Trans-body. For further details see J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24066-24073 (1999).
Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins (DARPins) are derived from Ankyrin which is a family of proteins that mediate attachment of integral membrane proteins to the cytoskeleton. A single ankyrin repeat is a 33 residue motif consisting of two α-helices and a β-turn. They can be engineered to bind different target antigens by randomizing residues in the first α-helix and a β-turn of each repeat. Their binding interface can be increased by increasing the number of modules (a method of affinity maturation). For further details see J. Mol. Biol. 332, 489-503 (2003), PNAS 100(4), 1700-1705 (2003) and J. Mol. Biol. 369, 1015-1028 (2007) and US20040132028A1.
Fibronectin is a scaffold which can be engineered to bind to antigen. Adnectins consists of a backbone of the natural amino acid sequence of the 10th domain of the repeating units of human fibronectin type III (FN3). Three loops at one end of the β-sandwich can be engineered to enable an Adnectin to specifically recognize a therapeutic target of interest. For further details see Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 18, 435-444 (2005), US20080139791, WO2005056764 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,818,418B1.
Peptide aptamers are combinatorial recognition molecules that consist of a constant scaffold protein, typically thioredoxin (TrxA) which contains a constrained variable peptide loop inserted at the active site. For further details see Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 5, 783-797 (2005).
Microbodies are derived from naturally occurring microproteins of 25-50 amino acids in length which contain 3-4 cysteine bridges—examples of microproteins include KalataB1 and conotoxin and knottins. The microproteins have a loop which can be engineered to include upto 25 amino acids without affecting the overall fold of the microprotein. For further details of engineered knottin domains, see WO2008098796.
Other epitope binding domains include proteins which have been used as a scaffold to engineer different target antigen binding properties include human γ-crystallin and human ubiquitin (affilins), kunitz type domains of human protease inhibitors, PDZ-domains of the Ras-binding protein AF-6, scorpion toxins (charybdotoxin), C-type lectin domain (tetranectins) are reviewed in Chapter 7—Non-Antibody Scaffolds from Handbook of Therapeutic Antibodies (2007, edited by Stefan Dubel) and Protein Science 15:14-27 (2006). Epitope binding domains of the present invention could be derived from any of these alternative protein domains.
As used herein, the terms “paired VH domain”, “paired VL domain”, and “paired VH/VL domains” refer to antibody variable domains which specifically bind antigen only when paired with their partner variable domain. There is always one VH and one VL in any pairing, and the term “paired VH domain” refers to the VH partner, the term “paired VL domain” refers to the VL partner, and the term “paired VH/VL domains” refers to the two domains together.
The term “antigen binding protein” as used herein refers to antibodies, antibody fragments, for example a domain antibody (dAb), ScFv, FAb, FAb2, and other protein constructs which are capable of binding to HGF and/or VEGF. Antigen binding molecules may comprise at least one Ig variable domain, for example antibodies, domain antibodies, Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2, Fv, ScFv, diabodies, mAbdAbs, affibodies, heteroconjugate antibodies or bispecifics. In one embodiment the antigen binding molecule is an antibody. In another embodiment the antigen binding molecule is a dAb, i.e. an immunoglobulin single variable domain such as a VH, VHH or VL that specifically binds an antigen or epitope independently of a different V region or domain. Antigen binding molecules may be capable of binding to two targets, I.e. they may be dual targeting proteins. Antigen binding molecules may be a combination of antibodies and antigen binding fragments such as for example, one or more domain antibodies and/or one or more ScFvs linked to a monoclonal antibody. Antigen binding molecules may also comprise a non-Immunoglobulin domain for example a domain which is a derivative of a scaffold selected from the group consisting of CTLA-4 (Evibody); lipocalin; Protein A derived molecules such as Z-domain of Protein A (Affibody, SpA), A-domain (Avimer/Maxibody); Heat shock proteins such as GroEI and GroES; transferrin (trans-body); ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin); peptide aptamer; C-type lectin domain (Tetranectin); human γ-crystallin and human ubiquitin (affilins); PDZ domains; scorpion toxinkunitz type domains of human protease inhibitors; and fibronectin (adnectin); which has been subjected to protein engineering in order to obtain binding to HGF or VEGF. As used herein “antigen binding protein” will be capable of antagonizing and/or neutralizing human HGF and/or VEGF. In addition, an antigen binding protein may block HGF and/or VEGF activity by binding to HGF and/or VEGF and preventing a natural ligand from binding and/or activating the receptor.
As used herein “VEGF antagonist” includes any compound capable of reducing and or eliminating at least one activity of VEGF. By way of example, an VEGF antagonist may bind to VEGF and that binding may directly reduce or eliminate VEGF activity or it may work indirectly by blocking at least one ligand from binding the receptor.
As used herein “HGF antagonist” includes any compound capable of reducing and or eliminating at least one activity of HGF. By way of example, an HGF antagonist may bind to HGF and that binding may directly reduce or eliminate HGF activity or it may work indirectly by blocking at least one ligand from binding the receptor.
In one embodiment of the invention the antigen-binding site binds to antigen with a Kd of at least 1 mM, for example a Kd of 10 nM, 1 nM, 500 pM, 200 pM, 100 pM, to each antigen as measured by Biacore™.
As used herein, the term “antigen-binding site” refers to a site on a construct which is capable of specifically binding to antigen, this may be a single domain, for example an epitope-binding domain, or it may be paired VH/VL domains as can be found on a standard antibody. In some aspects of the invention single-chain Fv (ScFv) domains can provide antigen-binding sites.
The terms “mAb/dAb” and dAb/mAb” are used herein to refer to antigen-binding proteins of the present invention. The two terms can be used interchangeably, and are intended to have the same meaning as used herein.
The term “Constant Heavy Chain 1” is used herein to refer to the CH1 domain of an immunoglobulin heavy chain.
The term “Constant Light Chain” is used herein to refer to the constant domain of an immunoglobulin light chain.
The present invention provides compositions comprising a HGF antagonist and a VEGF antagonist. The present invention also provides the combination of a HGF antagonist a VEGF antagonist, for use in therapy. The present invention also provides a method of treating disease by administering a HGF antagonist in combination with a VEGF antagonist. The HGF antagonist and the VEGF antagonist may be administered separately, sequentially or simultaneously.
Inhibition of angiogenesis is a therapeutic approach that has been established with the aim of starving the blood (and hence limiting the oxygen and nutrient) supply to the growing tumour. Multiple angiogenesis inhibitors have been therapeutically validated in preclinical cancer models and several clinical trials. Avastin (Bevacizumab), a monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF, has been approved as a first line therapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and non small lung carcinoma (NSCLC) in combination with chemotherapy and many small molecule compounds are in preclinical and clinical development. In certain cancers, such as breast and colon, agents such as these can slow the progression of the disease and lead to increased patient survival times of several months when given in combination with chemotherapy, but not when given alone. Indeed in several clinical trials the Bevacizumab-only arm was terminated early due to inferior performance relative to the plus chemotherapy (CT) arms. Initially this observation appeared paradoxical, since reducing the tumour blood supply has been shown to restrict the extent to which CT can be delivered to the tumour. Attempts to rationalize this observation are based on the proposition that an effect of Bevacizumab is to “normalize” the characteristically disordered vasculature of tumours. One postulated effect of the vascular normalization is the reduction of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), resulting in increased blood flow and penetration of the CT agents to the core of the tumour. An alternative theory for the effectiveness of Bevacizumab in combination with CT suggests that the blockade of VEGF reduces nutrient and oxygen supply and triggers pro-apoptotic events that augment those induced by the CT.
Recent work in in vivo models has begun to cast more light on the lack of long term efficacy of anti-angiogenesis inhibitors when used in mono-therapy to target inhibition of the VEGF pathway in the clinic. Several reports demonstrate the anti-tumour effects of such an approach but also show concomitant tumour adaptation and progression to stages of greater malignancy, with heightened invasiveness and in some cases increased lymphatic and distant metastasis. Therefore, a consequence of ‘starving’ cancer cells of oxygen (hypoxia), additional to its beneficial effect on the primary tumour growth, appears to be to drive the tumour cells elsewhere in search of it. In other words, anti-angiogenic therapy that produces anti-tumour effects and survival benefit by effectively inhibiting neo-vascularization can additionally alter the phenotype of tumours by increasing invasion and metastasis. Other reports have shown that hypoxia induces cancer cells to produce MET and to have increased signalling via HGF/MET mediated pathways which in turn causes those cells to become highly motile and to move to distal sites (metastatic spread). Furthermore, extended use of VEGF inhibitors alone may promote the use of alternative neo-angiogenesis pathways, opening the possibility of drug resistance as survival rates increase.
Hence, a bispecific molecule will combine in a single agent the activity of an HGF antibody (suppression of tumour growth, angiogenesis and metastasis) with the anti-angiogenic effects of VEGF blockade, and has several advantages over the use of each component separately. There is a potential for synergistic effects since the simultaneous neutralization of HGF and VEGF could suppress the metastatic response of the cells to hypoxia whilst delivering improved angiogenic control. Furthermore, the combination of these two activities could limit the potential for drug resistance to single agent anti-angiogenesis therapies as patient survival rates increase.
Such antagonists may be antibodies or epitope binding domains for example immunoglobulin single variable domains. The antagonists may be administered as a mixture of separate molecules which are administered at the same time i.e. co-administered, or are administered within 24 hours of each other, for example within 20 hours, or within 15 hours or within 12 hours, or within 10 hours, or within 8 hours, or within 6 hours, or within 4 hours, or within 2 hours, or within 1 hour, or within 30 minutes of each other.
Other HGF antagonists of use in the present invention comprise anti-c-MET antibodies, for example, the antibodies described in WO2009007427.
In a further embodiment the antagonists are present as one molecule capable of binding to two or more antigens, for example the invention provides a dual targeting molecule which is capable of binding to HGF and VEGF or which is capable of binding to HGF and VEGFR2, or which is capable of binding c-MET and VEGF.
The present invention provides an antigen-binding protein comprising a protein scaffold which is linked to one or more epitope-binding domains wherein the antigen-binding protein has at least two antigen-binding sites at least one of which is from an epitope binding domain and at least one of which is from a paired VH/VL domain and wherein at least one of the antigen-binding sites binds to HGF.
Such antigen-binding proteins comprise a protein scaffold, for example an Ig scaffold such as IgG, for example a monoclonal antibody, which is linked to one or more epitope-binding domains, for example a domain antibody, wherein the binding protein has at least two antigen-binding sites, at least one of which is from an epitope binding domain, and wherein at least one of the antigen-binding sites binds to HGF, and to methods of producing and uses thereof, particularly uses in therapy.
The antigen-binding proteins of the present invention are also referred to as mAbdAbs.
In one embodiment the protein scaffold of the antigen-binding protein of the present invention is an Ig scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold or IgA scaffold. The IgG scaffold may comprise all the domains of an antibody (i.e. CH1, CH2, CH3, VH, VL).
The antigen-binding protein of the present invention may comprise an IgG scaffold selected from IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4 or IgG4PE.
The antigen-binding protein of the present invention has at least two antigen-binding sites, for examples it has two binding sites, for example where the first binding site has specificity for a first epitope on an antigen and the second binding site has specificity for a second epitope on the same antigen. In a further embodiment there are 4 antigen-binding sites, or 6 antigen-binding sites, or 8 antigen-binding sites, or or more antigen-binding sites. In one embodiment the antigen-binding protein has specificity for more than one antigen, for example two antigens, or for three antigens, or for four antigens.
In another aspect the invention relates to an antigen-binding protein which is capable of binding to HGF comprising at least one homodimer comprising two or more structures of formula I:
wherein
X represents a constant antibody region comprising constant heavy domain 2 and constant heavy domain 3;
R1, R4, R7 and R8 represent a domain independently selected from an epitope-binding domain;
R2 represents a domain selected from the group consisting of constant heavy chain 1, and an epitope-binding domain;
R3 represents a domain selected from the group consisting of a paired VH and an epitope-binding domain;
R5 represents a domain selected from the group consisting of constant light chain, and an epitope-binding domain;
R6 represents a domain selected from the group consisting of a paired VL and an epitope-binding domain;
n represents an integer independently selected from: 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4;
m represents an integer independently selected from: 0 and 1,
wherein the Constant Heavy chain 1 and the Constant Light chain domains are associated;
wherein at least one epitope binding domain is present;
and when R3 represents a paired VH domain, R6 represents a paired VL domain, so that the two domains are together capable of binding antigen.
In one embodiment R6 represents a paired VL and R3 represents a paired VH.
In a further embodiment either one or both of R7 and R8 represent an epitope binding domain.
In yet a further embodiment either one or both of R1 and R4 represent an epitope binding domain.
In one embodiment R4 is present.
In one embodiment R1, R7 and R8 represent an epitope binding domain.
In one embodiment R1 R7 and R8, and R4 represent an epitope binding domain.
In one embodiment (R1)n, (R2)m, (R4)m and (R5)m=0, i.e. are not present, R3 is a paired VH domain, R6 is a paired VL domain, R8 is a VH dAb, and R7 is a VL dAb.
In another embodiment (R1)n, (R2)m, (R4)m and (R5)m are 0, i.e. are not present, R3 is a paired VH domain, R6 is a paired VL domain, R8 is a VH dAb, and (R7)m=0 i.e. not present.
In another embodiment (R2)m, and (R5)m are 0, i.e. are not present, R1 is a dAb, R4 is a dAb, R3 is a paired VH domain, R6 is a paired VL domain, (R8)m and (R7)m=0 i.e. not present.
In one embodiment of the present invention the epitope binding domain is an immunoglobulin single variable domain.
It will be understood that any of the antigen-binding proteins described herein will be capable of neutralizing one or more antigens, for example they will be capable of neutralizing HGF and they will also be capable of neutralizing VEGF.
The term “neutralizes” and grammatical variations thereof as used throughout the present specification in relation to antigen-binding proteins of the invention means that a biological activity of the target is reduced, either totally or partially, in the presence of the antigen-binding proteins of the present invention in comparison to the activity of the target in the absence of such antigen-binding proteins. Neutralisation may be due to but not limited to one or more of blocking ligand binding, preventing the ligand activating the receptor, down regulating the receptor or affecting effector functionality.
Levels of neutralisation can be measured in several ways, for example by use of any of the assays as set out in the examples below, for example in an assay which measures inhibition of ligand binding to receptor which may be carried out for example as described in Example 6. The neutralisation of HGF, in this assay is measured by assessing the decrease in phosphorylation of MET (Met phosphorylation is stimulated by HGF) in the presence of neutralizing antigen-binding protein. HGF protein suitable for use in this assay includes the HGF protein comprising the sequence of NCBI Reference Sequence: NM—000601.4 (UniProt ID P14210). Levels of neutralisation of VEGF can be measured for example by the assay described in Example 14. VEGF protein suitable for use in this assay includes VEGF165 which comprises the sequence of NCBI Reference NP—001020539.2 (UniProt ID: P15692).
Other methods of assessing neutralisation, for example, by assessing the decreased binding between the ligand and its receptor in the presence of neutralizing antigen-binding protein are known in the art, and include, for example, Biacore™ assays.
In an alternative aspect of the present invention there is provided antigen-binding proteins which have at least substantially equivalent neutralizing activity to the antigen binding proteins exemplified herein.
The antigen-binding proteins of the invention have specificity for HGF, for example they comprise an epitope-binding domain which is capable of binding to HGF, and/or they comprise a paired VH/VL which binds to HGF. The antigen-binding protein may comprise an antibody which is capable of binding to HGF. The antigen-binding protein may comprise an immunoglobulin single variable domain which is capable of binding to HGF.
In one embodiment the antigen-binding protein of the present invention has specificity for more than one antigen, for example where it is capable of binding HGF and VEGF. In one embodiment the antigen-binding protein of the present invention is capable of binding HGF and VEGF simultaneously.
It will be understood that any of the antigen-binding proteins described herein may be capable of binding two or more antigens simultaneously, for example, as determined by stochiometry analysis by using a suitable assay such as that described in Example 7.
Examples of such antigen-binding proteins include VEGF antibodies which have an epitope binding domain which is a HGF antagonist, for example an anti-HGF immunoglobulin single variable domain, attached to the c-terminus or the n-terminus of the heavy chain or the c-terminus or n-terminus of the light chain. Examples include an antigen binding protein comprising the heavy chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO:34 or 39 and/or the light chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO:35, wherein one or both of the Heavy and Light chain further comprise one or more epitope-binding domains which bind to HGF.
Examples of such antigen-binding proteins include HGF antibodies which have an epitope binding domain which is a VEGF antagonist attached to the c-terminus or the n-terminus of the heavy chain or the c-terminus. Examples include an antigen binding protein comprising the heavy chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 2, 6 or 10 and/or the light chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 4, 8 or 12, wherein one or both of the Heavy and Light chain further comprise one or more epitope-binding domains which is capable of antagonizing VEGF, for example by binding to VEGF or to a VEGF receptor for example VEGFR2. Such epitope-binding domains can be selected from those set out in SEQ ID NO: 25, 26, 36, 37 and 38.
In one embodiment the antigen binding protein comprises the heavy chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 2, 6, or 10, and a light chain sequence as set out in SEQ ID NO: 4, 8 or 12, and further comprising at least one epitope binding domain which is capable of antagonizing VEGF, for example an anti-dAb, for example those set out in SEQ ID NO: 25 or 26, or an anti-VEGF anticalin, for example as set out in SEQ ID NO: 26, or an anti-VEGFR2 adnectin, attached to the c-terminus or the n-terminus of the heavy chain or the c-terminus or n-terminus of the light chain.
Examples of such antigen-binding proteins include HGF antibodies which have an epitope binding domain comprising a VEGF immunoglobulin single variable domain attached to the c-terminus or the n-terminus of the heavy chain or the c-terminus or n-terminus of the light chain, for example an antigen binding protein having the heavy chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 14, 18 or 22, and the light chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 4, 8 or 12, or an antigen binding protein having the heavy chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 2, 6 or 10, and the light chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 16, 20 or 24, or an antigen binding protein having the heavy chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 14, 18 or 22, and the light chain sequence set out in SEQ ID NO: 16, 20 or 24.
In one embodiment the antigen-binding protein will comprise an anti-HGF antibody linked to an epitope binding domain which is a VEGF antagonist, wherein the anti-HGF antibody has the same CDRs as the antibody which has the heavy chain sequence of SEQ ID NO:2, and the light chain sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4, or the antibody which has the heavy chain sequence of SEQ ID NO:6, and the light chain sequence of SEQ ID NO: 10, or the antibody which has the heavy chain sequence of SEQ ID NO:8, and the light chain sequence of SEQ ID NO: 12.
In one embodiment the antigen-binding protein will comprise an anti-HGF antibody linked to an epitope binding domain which is a VEGF antagonist, wherein the heavy chain sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:10 and the light chain sequence comprises SEQ ID NO:12, for example the mAbdAb comprising the heavy chain sequence of SEQ ID NO:22 and the light chain sequence of SEQ ID NO:12.
Further details of HGF antibodies which are of use in the present invention are given in WO2005017107, WO2007/143098 and WO2007/115049.
Other examples of such antigen-binding proteins include anti-HGF antibodies which have an anti-VEGF epitope binding domain, attached to the c-terminus or the n-terminus of the heavy chain or the c-terminus or n-terminus of the light chain wherein the VEGF epitope binding domain is a VEGF dAb which is selected from any of the VEGF dAb sequences which are set out in WO2007080392 (which is incorporated herein by reference), in particular the dAbs which are set out in SEQ ID NO:117, 119, 123, 127-198, 539 and 540; or a VEGF dAb which is selected from any of the VEGF dAb sequences which are set out in WO2008149146 (which is incorporated herein by reference), in particular the dAbs which are described as DOM15-26-501, DOM15-26-555, DOM15-26-558, DOM15-26-589, DOM15-26-591, DOM15-26-594 and DOM15-26-595. or a VEGF dAb which is selected from any of the VEGF dAb sequences which are set out in WO2007066106 (which is incorporated herein by reference), or a VEGF dab which is selected from any of the VEGF dAb sequences which are set out in WO 2008149147 (which is incorporated herein by reference) or a VEGF dab which is selected from any of the VEGF dAb sequences which are set out in WO 2008149150 (which is incorporated herein by reference).
These specific sequences and related disclosures in WO2007080392, WO2008149146, WO2007066106, WO2008149147 and WO 2008149150 are incorporated herein by reference as though explicitly written herein with the express intention of providing disclosure for incorporation into claims herein and as examples of variable domains and antagonists for application in the context of the present invention.
Such antigen-binding proteins may also have one or more further epitope binding domains with the same or different antigen-specificity attached to the c-terminus and/or the n-terminus of the heavy chain and/or the c-terminus and/or n-terminus of the light chain.
In one embodiment of the present invention there is provided an antigen-binding protein according to the invention described herein and comprising a constant region such that the antibody has reduced ADCC and/or complement activation or effector functionality. In one such embodiment the heavy chain constant region may comprise a naturally disabled constant region of IgG2 or IgG4 isotype or a mutated IgG1 constant region. Examples of suitable modifications are described in EP0307434. One example comprises the substitutions of alanine residues at positions 235 and 237 (EU index numbering).
In one embodiment the antigen-binding proteins of the present invention will retain Fc functionality for example will be capable of one or both of ADCC and CDC activity. Such antigen-binding proteins may comprise an epitope-binding domain located on the light chain, for example on the c-terminus of the light chain.
The invention also provides a method of maintaining ADCC and CDC function of antigen-binding proteins by positioning of the epitope binding domain on the light chain of the antibody in particular, by positioning the epitope binding domain on the c-terminus of the light chain.
The invention also provides a method of reducing CDC function of antigen-binding proteins by positioning of the epitope binding domain on the heavy chain of the antibody, in particular, by positioning the epitope binding domain on the c-terminus of the heavy chain.
In one embodiment, the antigen-binding proteins comprise an epitope-binding domain which is a domain antibody (dAb), for example the epitope binding domain may be a human VH or human VL, or a camelid VHH(nanobody) or a shark dAb (NARV).
In one embodiment the antigen-binding proteins comprise an epitope-binding domain which is a derivative of a scaffold selected from the group consisting of CTLA-4 (Evibody); lipocalin; Protein A derived molecules such as Z-domain of Protein A (Affibody, SpA), A-domain (Avimer/Maxibody); Heat shock proteins such as GroEI and GroES; transferrin (trans-body); ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin); peptide aptamer; C-type lectin domain (Tetranectin); human γ-crystallin and human ubiquitin (affilins); PDZ domains; scorpion toxinkunitz type domains of human protease inhibitors; and fibronectin (adnectin); which has been subjected to protein engineering in order to obtain binding to a ligand other than its natural ligand.
The antigen-binding proteins of the present invention may comprise a protein scaffold attached to an epitope binding domain which is an adnectin, for example an IgG scaffold with an adnectin attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise a protein scaffold attached to an adnectin, for example an IgG scaffold with an adnectin attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise a protein scaffold attached to an adnectin, for example an IgG scaffold with an adnectin attached to the c-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise a protein scaffold attached to an adnectin, for example an IgG scaffold with an adnectin attached to the n-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is a CTLA-4, for example an IgG scaffold with a CTLA-4 attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a CTLA-4 attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with CTLA-4 attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with CTLA-4 attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is a lipocalin, for example an IgG scaffold with a lipocalin attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a lipocalin attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a lipocalin attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with a lipocalin attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is an SpA, for example an IgG scaffold with an SpA attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with an SpA attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with an SpA attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with an SpA attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is an affibody, for example an IgG scaffold with an affibody attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with an affibody attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with an affibody attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with an affibody attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is an affimer, for example an IgG scaffold with an affimer attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with an affimer attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with an affimer attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with an affimer attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is a GroEI, for example an IgG scaffold with a GroEI attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a GroEI attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a GroEI attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with a GroEI attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is a transferrin, for example an IgG scaffold with a transferrin attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a transferrin attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a transferrin attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with a transferrin attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is a GroES, for example an IgG scaffold with a GroES attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a GroES attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a GroES attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with a GroES attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is a DARPin, for example an IgG scaffold with a DARPin attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a DARPin attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a DARPin attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with a DARPin attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In other embodiments it may comprise a protein scaffold, for example an IgG scaffold, attached to an epitope binding domain which is a peptide aptamer, for example an IgG scaffold with a peptide aptamer attached to the n-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a peptide aptamer attached to the c-terminus of the heavy chain, or it may comprise for example an IgG scaffold with a peptide aptamer attached to the n-terminus of the light chain, or it may comprise an IgG scaffold with a peptide aptamer attached to the c-terminus of the light chain.
In one embodiment of the present invention there are four epitope binding domains, for example four domain antibodies, two of the epitope binding domains may have specificity for the same antigen, or all of the epitope binding domains present in the antigen-binding protein may have specificity for the same antigen.
Protein scaffolds of the present invention may be linked to epitope-binding domains by the use of linkers. Examples of suitable linkers include amino acid sequences which may be from 1 amino acid to 150 amino acids in length, or from 1 amino acid to 140 amino acids, for example, from 1 amino acid to 130 amino acids, or from 1 to 120 amino acids, or from 1 to 80 amino acids, or from 1 to 50 amino acids, or from 1 to 20 amino acids, or from 1 to 10 amino acids, or from 5 to 18 amino acids. Such sequences may have their own tertiary structure, for example, a linker of the present invention may comprise a single variable domain. The size of a linker in one embodiment is equivalent to a single variable domain. Suitable linkers may be of a size from 1 to 20 angstroms, for example less than 15 angstroms, or less than 10 angstroms, or less than 5 angstroms.
In one embodiment of the present invention at least one of the epitope binding domains is directly attached to the Ig scaffold with a linker comprising from 1 to 150 amino acids, for example 1 to 20 amino acids, for example 1 to 10 amino acids. Such linkers may be selected from any one of those set out in SEQ ID NO: 27-32, or multiples of such linkers.
Linkers of use in the antigen-binding proteins of the present invention may comprise alone or in addition to other linkers, one or more sets of GS residues, for example ‘GSTVAAPS’ or TVAAPSGS' or ‘GSTVAAPSGS’. In one embodiment the linker comprises SEQ ID NO:28.
In one embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘(PAS)n(GS)m’. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘(GGGGS)n(GS)m’. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘(TVAAPS)n(GS)m’. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘(GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n’. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘(PAVPPP)n(GS)m’. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘(TVSDVP)n(GS)m’. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘(TGLDSP)n(GS)m’. In all such embodiments, n=1-10, and m=0-4.
Examples of such linkers include (PAS)n(GS)m wherein n=1 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:46), (PAS)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:47), (PAS)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:48), (PAS)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=1, (PAS)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=0, (PAS)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=0, (PAS)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=0.
Examples of such linkers include (GGGGS)n(GS)m wherein n=1 and m=1, (GGGGS)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=1, (GGGGS)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=1, (GGGGS)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=1, (GGGGS)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=0 (SEQ ID NO:49), (GGGGS)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=0 (SEQ ID NO:50), (GGGGS)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=0.
Examples of such linkers include (TVAAPS)n(GS)m wherein n=1 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:32), (TVAAPS)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:64), (TVAAPS)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:65), (TVAAPS)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=1, (TVAAPS)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=0, (TVAAPS)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=0, (TVAAPS)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=0.
Examples of such linkers include (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=1 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:40), (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=2 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:41), (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=3 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:42), or (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=4 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:43), (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=5 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:44), (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=6 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:45), (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=1 and m=0 (SEQ ID NO:32), (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=2 and m=10, (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=3 and m=0, or (GS)m(TVAAPSGS)n wherein n=0.
Examples of such linkers include (PAVPPP)n(GS)m wherein n=1 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:51), (PAVPPP)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:52), (PAVPPP)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:53), (PAVPPP)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=1, (PAVPPP)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=0, (PAVPPP)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=0, (PAVPPP)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=0.
Examples of such linkers include (TVSDVP)n(GS)m wherein n=1 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO: 54), (TVSDVP)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:55), (TVSDVP)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:56), (TVSDVP)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=1, (TVSDVP)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=0, (TVSDVP)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=0, (TVSDVP)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=0.
Examples of such linkers include (TGLDSP)n(GS)m wherein n=1 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:57), (TGLDSP)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:58), (TGLDSP)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=1 (SEQ ID NO:59), (TGLDSP)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=1, (TGLDSP)n(GS)m wherein n=2 and m=0, (TGLDSP)n(GS)m wherein n=3 and m=0, (TGLDSP)n(GS)m wherein n=4 and m=0.
In another embodiment there is no linker between the epitope binding domain and the Ig scaffold. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker TVAAPS'. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain, is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker TVAAPSGS'. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘GS’. In another embodiment the epitope binding domain is linked to the Ig scaffold by the linker ‘ASTKGPT’.
In one embodiment, the antigen-binding protein of the present invention comprises at least one antigen-binding site, for example at least one epitope binding domain, which is capable of binding human serum albumin.
In one embodiment, there are at least 3 antigen-binding sites, for example there are 4, or 5 or 6 or 8 or 10 antigen-binding sites and the antigen-binding protein is capable of binding at least 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 8 or 10 antigens, for example it is capable of binding 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 8 or 10 antigens simultaneously.
The invention also provides the antigen-binding proteins for use in medicine, for example for use in the manufacture of a medicament for treating solid tumours believed to require angiogenesis or to be associated with elevated levels of HGF (HGF/Met signaling) and/or VEGF. Such tumours include colon, breast, ovarian, lung (small cell or non small cell), prostate, pancreatic, renal, liver, gastric, head and neck, melanoma, sarcoma. Also included are primary and secondary (metastatic) brain tumours including, but not limited to gliomas (including epenymomas), meningiomas, oligodendromas, astrocytomas (low grade, anaplastic and glioblastoma multiforme), medulloblastomas, gangliomas, schwannnomas and chordomas. Other diseases associated with undesirable angiogenesis that are suitable for treatment with the antigen binding proteins of the present invention include age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, RA and psoriasis.
The invention provides a method of treating a patient suffering from solid tumours (including colon, breast, ovarian, lung (small cell or non small cell), prostate, pancreatic, renal, liver, gastric, head and neck, melanoma, sarcoma), primary and secondary (metastatic) brain tumours including, but not limited to gliomas (including epenymomas), meningiomas, oligodendromas, astrocytomas (low grade, anaplastic and glioblastoma multiforme), medulloblastomas, gangliomas, schwannnomas and chordomas, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, RA or psoriasis comprising administering a therapeutic amount of an antigen-binding protein of the invention.
The antigen-binding proteins of the invention may be used for the treatment of solid tumours (including colon, breast, ovarian, lung (small cell or non small cell), prostate, pancreatic, renal, liver, gastric, head and neck, melanoma, sarcoma), primary and secondary (metastatic) brain tumours including, but not limited to gliomas (including epenymomas), meningiomas, oligodendromas, astrocytomas (low grade, anaplastic and glioblastoma multiforme), medulloblastomas, gangliomas, schwannnomas and chordomas, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, RA or psoriasis or any other disease associated with the over production of HGF and/or VEGF.
The antigen-binding proteins of the invention may have some effector function. For example if the protein scaffold contains an Fc region derived from an antibody with effector function, for example if the protein scaffold comprises CH2 and CH3 from IgG1. Levels of effector function can be varied according to known techniques, for example by mutations in the CH2 domain, for example wherein the IgG1 CH2 domain has one or more mutations at positions selected from 239 and 332 and 330, for example the mutations are selected from S239D and 1332E and A330L such that the antibody has enhanced effector function, and/or for example altering the glycosylation profile of the antigen-binding protein of the invention such that there is a reduction in fucosylation of the Fc region.
Protein scaffolds of use in the present invention include full monoclonal antibody scaffolds comprising all the domains of an antibody, or protein scaffolds of the present invention may comprise a non-conventional antibody structure, such as a monovalent antibody. Such monovalent antibodies may comprise a paired heavy and light chain wherein the hinge region of the heavy chain is modified so that the heavy chain does not homodimerise, such as the monovalent antibody described in WO2007059782. Other monovalent antibodies may comprise a paired heavy and light chain which dimerises with a second heavy chain which is lacking a functional variable region and CH1 region, wherein the first and second heavy chains are modified so that they will form heterodimers rather than homodimers, resulting in a monovalent antibody with two heavy chains and one light chain such as the monovalent antibody described in WO2006015371. Such monovalent antibodies can provide the protein scaffold of the present invention to which epitope binding domains can be linked.
Epitope-binding domains of use in the present invention are domains that specifically bind an antigen or epitope independently of a different V region or domain, this may be a domain antibody or may be a domain which is a derivative of a non-immunoglobulin scaffold selected from the group consisting of CTLA-4 (Evibody); lipocalin; Protein A derived molecules such as Z-domain of Protein A (Affibody, SpA), A-domain (Avimer/Maxibody); Heat shock proteins such as GroEI and GroES; transferrin (trans-body); ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin); peptide aptamer; C-type lectin domain (Tetranectin); human γ-crystallin and human ubiquitin (affilins); PDZ domains; scorpion toxinkunitz type domains of human protease inhibitors; and fibronectin (adnectin); which has been subjected to protein engineering in order to obtain binding to a ligand other than its natural ligand. In one embodiment this may be an domain antibody or other suitable domains such as a domain selected from the group consisting of CTLA-4, lipocallin, SpA, an Affibody, an avimer, GroEI, transferrin, GroES and fibronectin. In one embodiment this may be selected from a immunoglobulin single variable domain, an Affibody, an ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) and an adnectin. In another embodiment this may be selected from an Affibody, an ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) and an adnectin. In another embodiment this may be a domain antibody, for example a domain antibody selected from a human, camelid or shark (NARV) domain antibody.
Epitope-binding domains can be linked to the protein scaffold at one or more positions. These positions include the C-terminus and the N-terminus of the protein scaffold, for example at the C-terminus of the heavy chain and/or the C-terminus of the light chain of an IgG, or for example the N-terminus of the heavy chain and/or the N-terminus of the light chain of an IgG.
In one embodiment, a first epitope binding domain is linked to the protein scaffold and a second epitope binding domain is linked to the first epitope binding domain, for example where the protein scaffold is an IgG scaffold, a first epitope binding domain may be linked to the c-terminus of the heavy chain of the IgG scaffold, and that epitope binding domain can be linked at its c-terminus to a second epitope binding domain, or for example a first epitope binding domain may be linked to the c-terminus of the light chain of the IgG scaffold, and that first epitope binding domain may be further linked at its c-terminus to a second epitope binding domain, or for example a first epitope binding domain may be linked to the n-terminus of the light chain of the IgG scaffold, and that first epitope binding domain may be further linked at its n-terminus to a second epitope binding domain, or for example a first epitope binding domain may be linked to the n-terminus of the heavy chain of the IgG scaffold, and that first epitope binding domain may be further linked at its n-terminus to a second epitope binding domain.
When the epitope-binding domain is a domain antibody, some domain antibodies may be suited to particular positions within the scaffold.
Domain antibodies of use in the present invention can be linked at the C-terminal end of the heavy chain and/or the light chain of conventional IgGs. In addition some immunoglobulin single variable domains can be linked to the C-terminal ends of both the heavy chain and the light chain of conventional antibodies.
In constructs where the N-terminus of immunoglobulin single variable domains are fused to an antibody constant domain (either CH3 or CL), a peptide linker may help the immunoglobulin single variable domain to bind to antigen. Indeed, the N-terminal end of a dAb is located closely to the complementarity-determining regions (CDRS) involved in antigen-binding activity. Thus a short peptide linker acts as a spacer between the epitope-binding, and the constant domain fo the protein scaffold, which may allow the dAb CDRs to more easily reach the antigen, which may therefore bind with high affinity.
The surroundings in which immunoglobulin single variable domains are linked to the IgG will differ depending on which antibody chain they are fused to: When fused at the C-terminal end of the antibody light chain of an IgG scaffold, each immunoglobulin single variable domain is expected to be located in the vicinity of the antibody hinge and the Fc portion. It is likely that such immunoglobulin single variable domains will be located far apart from each other. In conventional antibodies, the angle between Fab fragments and the angle between each Fab fragment and the Fc portion can vary quite significantly. It is likely that—with mAbdAbs—the angle between the Fab fragments will not be widely different, whilst some angular restrictions may be observed with the angle between each Fab fragment and the Fc portion.
When fused at the C-terminal end of the antibody heavy chain of an IgG scaffold, each immunoglobulin single variable domain is expected to be located in the vicinity of the CH3 domains of the Fc portion. This is not expected to impact on the Fc binding properties to Fc receptors (e.g. FcγRI, II, III an FcRn) as these receptors engage with the CH2 domains (for the FcγRI, II and III class of receptors) or with the hinge between the CH2 and CH3 domains (e.g. FcRn receptor). Another feature of such antigen-binding proteins is that both immunoglobulin single variable domains are expected to be spatially close to each other and provided that flexibility is provided by provision of appropriate linkers, these immunoglobulin single variable domains may even form homodimeric species, hence propagating the ‘zipped’ quaternary structure of the Fc portion, which may enhance stability of the construct.
Such structural considerations can aid in the choice of the most suitable position to link an epitope-binding domain, for example a dAb, on to a protein scaffold, for example an antibody.
The size of the antigen, its localization (in blood or on cell surface), its quaternary structure (monomeric or multimeric) can vary. Conventional antibodies are naturally designed to function as adaptor constructs due to the presence of the hinge region, wherein the orientation of the two antigen-binding sites at the tip of the Fab fragments can vary widely and hence adapt to the molecular feature of the antigen and its surroundings. In contrast immunoglobulin single variable domains linked to an antibody or other protein scaffold, for example a protein scaffold which comprises an antibody with no hinge region, may have less structural flexibility either directly or indirectly.
Understanding the solution state and mode of binding at the immunoglobulin single variable domain is also helpful. Evidence has accumulated that in vitro dAbs can predominantly exist in monomeric, homo-dimeric or multimeric forms in solution (Reiter et al. (1999) J Mol Biol 290 p 685-698; Ewert et al (2003) J Mol Biol 325, p 531-553, Jespers et al (2004) J Mol Biol 337 p 893-903; Jespers et al (2004) Nat Biotechnol 22 p 1161-1165; Martin et al (1997) Protein Eng. 10 p 607-614; Sepulvada et al (2003) J Mol Biol 333 p 355-365). This is fairly reminiscent to multimerization events observed in vivo with Ig domains such as Bence-Jones proteins (which are dimers of immunoglobulin light chains (Epp et al (1975) Biochemistry 14 p 4943-4952; Huan et al (1994) Biochemistry 33 p 14848-14857; Huang et al (1997) Mol immunol 34 p 1291-1301) and amyloid fibers (James et al. (2007) J Mol. Biol. 367:603-8).
For example, it may be desirable to link dabs that tend to dimerise in solution to the C-terminal end of the Fc portion in preference to the C-terminal end of the light chain as linking to the C-terminal end of the Fc will allow those dAbs to dimerise in the context of the antigen-binding protein of the invention.
The antigen-binding proteins of the present invention may comprise antigen-binding sites specific for a single antigen, or may have antigen-binding sites specific for two or more antigens, or for two or more epitopes on a single antigen, or there may be antigen-binding sites each of which is specific for a different epitope on the same or different antigens.
In particular, the antigen-binding proteins of the present invention may be useful in treating diseases associated with HGF and VEGF for example solid tumours believed to require angiogenesis or to be associated with elevated levels of HGF (HGF/Met signaling) and/or VEGF. Such tumours include colon, breast, ovarian, lung (small cell or non small cell), prostate, pancreatic, renal, liver, gastric, head and neck, melanoma, sarcoma. Also included are primary and secondary (metastatic) brain tumours including, but not limited to gliomas (including epenymomas), meningiomas, oligodendromas, astrocytomas (low grade, anaplastic and glioblastoma multiforme), medulloblastomas, gangliomas, schwannnomas and chordomas. Other diseases associated with undesirable angiogenesis that are suitable for treatment with the antigen binding proteins of the present invention include age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, RA and psoriasis.
The antigen-binding proteins of the present invention may be produced by transfection of a host cell with an expression vector comprising the coding sequence for the antigen-binding protein of the invention. An expression vector or recombinant plasmid is produced by placing these coding sequences for the antigen-binding protein in operative association with conventional regulatory control sequences capable of controlling the replication and expression in, and/or secretion from, a host cell. Regulatory sequences include promoter sequences, e.g., CMV promoter, and signal sequences which can be derived from other known antibodies. Similarly, a second expression vector can be produced having a DNA sequence which encodes a complementary antigen-binding protein light or heavy chain. In certain embodiments this second expression vector is identical to the first except insofar as the coding sequences and selectable markers are concerned, so to ensure as far as possible that each polypeptide chain is functionally expressed. Alternatively, the heavy and light chain coding sequences for the antigen-binding protein may reside on a single vector, for example in two expression cassettes in the same vector. A selected host cell is co-transfected by conventional techniques with both the first and second vectors (or simply transfected by a single vector) to create the transfected host cell of the invention comprising both the recombinant or synthetic light and heavy chains. The transfected cell is then cultured by conventional techniques to produce the engineered antigen-binding protein of the invention. The antigen-binding protein which includes the association of both the recombinant heavy chain and/or light chain is screened from culture by appropriate assay, such as ELISA or RIA. Similar conventional techniques may be employed to construct other antigen-binding proteins.
Suitable vectors for the cloning and subcloning steps employed in the methods and construction of the compositions of this invention may be selected by one of skill in the art. For example, the conventional pUC series of cloning vectors may be used. One vector, pUC19, is commercially available from supply houses, such as Amersham (Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) or Pharmacia (Uppsala, Sweden). Additionally, any vector which is capable of replicating readily, has an abundance of cloning sites and selectable genes (e.g., antibiotic resistance), and is easily manipulated may be used for cloning. Thus, the selection of the cloning vector is not a limiting factor in this invention.
The expression vectors may also be characterized by genes suitable for amplifying expression of the heterologous DNA sequences, e.g., the mammalian dihydrofolate reductase gene (DHFR). Other vector sequences include a poly A signal sequence, such as from bovine growth hormone (BGH) and the betaglobin promoter sequence (betaglopro). The expression vectors useful herein may be synthesized by techniques well known to those skilled in this art.
The components of such vectors, e.g. replicons, selection genes, enhancers, promoters, signal sequences and the like, may be obtained from commercial or natural sources or synthesized by known procedures for use in directing the expression and/or secretion of the product of the recombinant DNA in a selected host. Other appropriate expression vectors of which numerous types are known in the art for mammalian, bacterial, insect, yeast, and fungal expression may also be selected for this purpose.
The present invention also encompasses a cell line transfected with a recombinant plasmid containing the coding sequences of the antigen-binding proteins of the present invention. Host cells useful for the cloning and other manipulations of these cloning vectors are also conventional. However, cells from various strains of E. coli may be used for replication of the cloning vectors and other steps in the construction of antigen-binding proteins of this invention. Suitable host cells or cell lines for the expression of the antigen-binding proteins of the invention include mammalian cells such as NS0, Sp2/0, CHO (e.g. DG44), COS, HEK, a fibroblast cell (e.g., 3T3), and myeloma cells, for example it may be expressed in a CHO or a myeloma cell. Human cells may be used, thus enabling the molecule to be modified with human glycosylation patterns. Alternatively, other eukaryotic cell lines may be employed. The selection of suitable mammalian host cells and methods for transformation, culture, amplification, screening and product production and purification are known in the art. See, e.g., Sambrook et al., cited above.
Bacterial cells may prove useful as host cells suitable for the expression of the recombinant Fabs or other embodiments of the present invention (see, e.g., Plückthun, A., Immunol. Rev., 130:151-188 (1992)). However, due to the tendency of proteins expressed in bacterial cells to be in an unfolded or improperly folded form or in a non-glycosylated form, any recombinant Fab produced in a bacterial cell would have to be screened for retention of antigen binding ability. If the molecule expressed by the bacterial cell was produced in a properly folded form, that bacterial cell would be a desirable host, or in alternative embodiments the molecule may express in the bacterial host and then be subsequently re-folded. For example, various strains of E. coli used for expression are well-known as host cells in the field of biotechnology. Various strains of B. subtilis, Streptomyces, other bacilli and the like may also be employed in this method.
Where desired, strains of yeast cells known to those skilled in the art are also available as host cells, as well as insect cells, e.g. Drosophila and Lepidoptera and viral expression systems. See, e.g. Miller et al., Genetic Engineering, 8:277-298, Plenum Press (1986) and references cited therein.
The general methods by which the vectors may be constructed, the transfection methods required to produce the host cells of the invention, and culture methods necessary to produce the antigen-binding protein of the invention from such host cell may all be conventional techniques. Typically, the culture method of the present invention is a serum-free culture method, usually by culturing cells serum-free in suspension. Likewise, once produced, the antigen-binding proteins of the invention may be purified from the cell culture contents according to standard procedures of the art, including ammonium sulfate precipitation, affinity columns, column chromatography, gel electrophoresis and the like. Such techniques are within the skill of the art and do not limit this invention. For example, preparation of altered antibodies are described in WO 99/58679 and WO 96/16990. Yet another method of expression of the antigen-binding proteins may utilize expression in a transgenic animal, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,873,316. This relates to an expression system using the animal's casein promoter which when transgenically incorporated into a mammal permits the female to produce the desired recombinant protein in its milk.
In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method of producing an antibody of the invention which method comprises the step of culturing a host cell transformed or transfected with a vector encoding the light and/or heavy chain of the antibody of the invention and recovering the antibody thereby produced. In accordance with the present invention there is provided a method of producing an antigen-binding protein of the present invention which method comprises the steps of;
Once expressed by the desired method, the antigen-binding protein is then examined for in vitro activity by use of an appropriate assay. Presently conventional ELISA assay formats are employed to assess qualitative and quantitative binding of the antigen-binding protein to its target. Additionally, other in vitro assays may also be used to verify neutralizing efficacy prior to subsequent human clinical studies performed to evaluate the persistence of the antigen-binding protein in the body despite the usual clearance mechanisms.
The dose and duration of treatment relates to the relative duration of the molecules of the present invention in the human circulation, and can be adjusted by one of skill in the art depending upon the condition being treated and the general health of the patient. It is envisaged that repeated dosing (e.g. once a week or once every two weeks) over an extended time period (e.g. four to six months) maybe required to achieve maximal therapeutic efficacy.
The mode of administration of the therapeutic agent of the invention may be any suitable route which delivers the agent to the host. The antigen-binding proteins, and pharmaceutical compositions of the invention are particularly useful for parenteral administration, i.e., subcutaneously (s.c.), intrathecally, intraperitoneally, intramuscularly (i.m.), intravenously (i.v.), or intranasally.
Therapeutic agents of the invention may be prepared as pharmaceutical compositions containing an effective amount of the antigen-binding protein of the invention as an active ingredient in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In the prophylactic agent of the invention, an aqueous suspension or solution containing the antigen-binding protein, may be buffered at physiological pH, in a form ready for injection. The compositions for parenteral administration will commonly comprise a solution of the antigen-binding protein of the invention or a cocktail thereof dissolved in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, for example an aqueous carrier. A variety of aqueous carriers may be employed, e.g., 0.9% saline, 0.3% glycine, and the like. These solutions may be made sterile and generally free of particulate matter. These solutions may be sterilized by conventional, well known sterilization techniques (e.g., filtration). The compositions may contain pharmaceutically acceptable auxiliary substances as required to approximate physiological conditions such as pH adjusting and buffering agents, etc. The concentration of the antigen-binding protein of the invention in such pharmaceutical formulation can vary widely, i.e., from less than about 0.5%, usually at or at least about 1% to as much as 15 or 20% by weight and will be selected primarily based on fluid volumes, viscosities, etc., according to the particular mode of administration selected.
Thus, a pharmaceutical composition of the invention for intramuscular injection could be prepared to contain 1 mL sterile buffered water, and between about 1 ng to about 200 mg, e.g. about 50 ng to about 30 mg, or about 5 mg to about 25 mg, of an antigen-binding protein of the invention. Similarly, a pharmaceutical composition of the invention for intravenous infusion could be made up to contain about 250 ml of sterile Ringer's solution, and about 1 to about 30 or about 5 mg to about 25 mg of an antigen-binding protein of the invention per ml of Ringer's solution. Actual methods for preparing parenterally administrable compositions are well known or will be apparent to those skilled in the art and are described in more detail in, for example, Remington's Pharmaceutical Science, 15th ed., Mack Publishing Company, Easton, Pa. For the preparation of intravenously administrable antigen-binding protein formulations of the invention see Lasmar U and Parkins D “The formulation of Biopharmaceutical products”, Pharma. Sci. Tech. today, page 129-137, Vol. 3 (3rdApr. 2000), Wang, W “Instability, stabilisation and formulation of liquid protein pharmaceuticals”, Int. J. Pharm 185 (1999) 129-188, Stability of Protein Pharmaceuticals Part A and B ed Ahern T. J., Manning M. C., New York, N.Y.: Plenum Press (1992), Akers, M. J. “Excipient-Drug interactions in Parenteral Formulations”, J. Pharm Sci 91 (2002) 2283-2300, Imamura, K et al “Effects of types of sugar on stabilization of Protein in the dried state”, J Pharm Sci 92 (2003) 266-274, Izutsu, Kkojima, S. “Excipient crystallinity and its protein-structure-stabilizing effect during freeze-drying”, J. Pharm. Pharmacol, 54 (2002) 1033-1039, Johnson, R, “Mannitol-sucrose mixtures-versatile formulations for protein lyophilization”, J. Pharm. Sci, 91 (2002) 914-922.
Ha, E Wang W, Wang Y. j. “Peroxide formation in polysorbate 80 and protein stability”, J. Pharm Sci, 91, 2252-2264, (2002) the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference and to which the reader is specifically referred.
In one embodiment the therapeutic agent of the invention, when in a pharmaceutical preparation, is present in unit dose forms. The appropriate therapeutically effective dose will be determined readily by those of skill in the art. Suitable doses may be calculated for patients according to their weight, for example suitable doses may be in the range of 0.01 to 20 mg/kg, for example 0.1 to 20 mg/kg, for example 1 to 20 mg/kg, for example 10 to 20 mg/kg or for example 1 to 15 mg/kg, for example 10 to 15 mg/kg. To effectively treat conditions of use in the present invention in a human, suitable doses may be within the range of 0.01 to 1000 mg, for example 0.1 to 1000 mg, for example 0.1 to 500 mg, for example 500 mg, for example 0.1 to 100 mg, or 0.1 to 80 mg, or 0.1 to 60 mg, or 0.1 to 40 mg, or for example 1 to 100 mg, or 1 to 50 mg, of an antigen-binding protein of this invention, which may be administered parenterally, for example subcutaneously, intravenously or intramuscularly. Such dose may, if necessary, be repeated at appropriate time intervals selected as appropriate by a physician.
The antigen-binding proteins described herein can be lyophilized for storage and reconstituted in a suitable carrier prior to use. This technique has been shown to be effective with conventional immunoglobulins and art-known lyophilization and reconstitution techniques can be employed.
There are several methods known in the art which can be used to find epitope-binding domains of use in the present invention.
The term “library” refers to a mixture of heterogeneous polypeptides or nucleic acids. The library is composed of members, each of which has a single polypeptide or nucleic acid sequence. To this extent, “library” is synonymous with “repertoire.” Sequence differences between library members are responsible for the diversity present in the library. The library may take the form of a simple mixture of polypeptides or nucleic acids, or may be in the form of organisms or cells, for example bacteria, viruses, animal or plant cells and the like, transformed with a library of nucleic acids. In one example, each individual organism or cell contains only one or a limited number of library members. Advantageously, the nucleic acids are incorporated into expression vectors, in order to allow expression of the polypeptides encoded by the nucleic acids. In a one aspect, therefore, a library may take the form of a population of host organisms, each organism containing one or more copies of an expression vector containing a single member of the library in nucleic acid form which can be expressed to produce its corresponding polypeptide member. Thus, the population of host organisms has the potential to encode a large repertoire of diverse polypeptides.
A “universal framework” is a single antibody framework sequence corresponding to the regions of an antibody conserved in sequence as defined by Kabat (“Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest”, US Department of Health and Human Services) or corresponding to the human germline immunoglobulin repertoire or structure as defined by Chothia and Lesk, (1987) J. Mol. Biol. 196:910-917. There may be a single framework, or a set of such frameworks, which has been found to permit the derivation of virtually any binding specificity though variation in the hypervariable regions alone.
Amino acid and nucleotide sequence alignments and homology, similarity or identity, as defined herein are in one embodiment prepared and determined using the algorithm BLAST 2 Sequences, using default parameters (Tatusova, T. A. et al., FEMS Microbiol Lett, 174:187-188 (1999)).
When a display system (e.g., a display system that links coding function of a nucleic acid and functional characteristics of the peptide or polypeptide encoded by the nucleic acid) is used in the methods described herein, eg in the selection of a dAb or other epitope binding domain, it is frequently advantageous to amplify or increase the copy number of the nucleic acids that encode the selected peptides or polypeptides.
This provides an efficient way of obtaining sufficient quantities of nucleic acids and/or peptides or polypeptides for additional rounds of selection, using the methods described herein or other suitable methods, or for preparing additional repertoires (e.g., affinity maturation repertoires). Thus, in some embodiments, the methods of selecting epitope binding domains comprises using a display system (e.g., that links coding function of a nucleic acid and functional characteristics of the peptide or polypeptide encoded by the nucleic acid, such as phage display) and further comprises amplifying or increasing the copy number of a nucleic acid that encodes a selected peptide or polypeptide. Nucleic acids can be amplified using any suitable methods, such as by phage amplification, cell growth or polymerase chain reaction.
In one example, the methods employ a display system that links the coding function of a nucleic acid and physical, chemical and/or functional characteristics of the polypeptide encoded by the nucleic acid. Such a display system can comprise a plurality of replicable genetic packages, such as bacteriophage or cells (bacteria). The display system may comprise a library, such as a bacteriophage display library. Bacteriophage display is an example of a display system.
A number of suitable bacteriophage display systems (e.g., monovalent display and multivalent display systems) have been described. (See, e.g., Griffiths et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,555,313 B1 (incorporated herein by reference); Johnson et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,743 (incorporated herein by reference); McCafferty et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,108 (incorporated herein by reference); Mulligan-Kehoe, U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,892 (Incorporated herein by reference); Winter, G. et al., Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:433-455 (1994); Soumillion, P. et al., Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 47(2-3):175-189 (1994); Castagnoli, L. et al., Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen, 4(2):121-133 (2001).) The peptides or polypeptides displayed in a bacteriophage display system can be displayed on any suitable bacteriophage, such as a filamentous phage (e.g., fd, M13, F1), a lytic phage (e.g., T4, T7, lambda), or an RNA phage (e.g., MS2), for example.
Generally, a library of phage that displays a repertoire of peptides or phagepolypeptides, as fusion proteins with a suitable phage coat protein (e.g., fd pIII protein), is produced or provided. The fusion protein can display the peptides or polypeptides at the tip of the phage coat protein, or if desired at an internal position. For example, the displayed peptide or polypeptide can be present at a position that is amino-terminal to domain 1 of pIII. (Domain 1 of pIII is also referred to as N1.) The displayed polypeptide can be directly fused to pIII (e.g., the N-terminus of domain 1 of pIII) or fused to pIII using a linker. If desired, the fusion can further comprise a tag (e.g., myc epitope, His tag). Libraries that comprise a repertoire of peptides or polypeptides that are displayed as fusion proteins with a phage coat protein, can be produced using any suitable methods, such as by introducing a library of phage vectors or phagemid vectors encoding the displayed peptides or polypeptides into suitable host bacteria, and culturing the resulting bacteria to produce phage (e.g., using a suitable helper phage or complementing plasmid if desired). The library of phage can be recovered from the culture using any suitable method, such as precipitation and centrifugation.
The display system can comprise a repertoire of peptides or polypeptides that contains any desired amount of diversity. For example, the repertoire can contain peptides or polypeptides that have amino acid sequences that correspond to naturally occurring polypeptides expressed by an organism, group of organisms, desired tissue or desired cell type, or can contain peptides or polypeptides that have random or randomized amino acid sequences. If desired, the polypeptides can share a common core or scaffold. For example, all polypeptides in the repertoire or library can be based on a scaffold selected from protein A, protein L, protein G, a fibronectin domain, an anticalin, CTLA4, a desired enzyme (e.g., a polymerase, a cellulase), or a polypeptide from the immunoglobulin superfamily, such as an antibody or antibody fragment (e.g., an antibody variable domain). The polypeptides in such a repertoire or library can comprise defined regions of random or randomized amino acid sequence and regions of common amino acid sequence. In certain embodiments, all or substantially all polypeptides in a repertoire are of a desired type, such as a desired enzyme (e.g., a polymerase) or a desired antigen-binding fragment of an antibody (e.g., human VH or human VL). In some embodiments, the polypeptide display system comprises a repertoire of polypeptides wherein each polypeptide comprises an antibody variable domain. For example, each polypeptide in the repertoire can contain a VH, a VL or an Fv (e.g., a single chain Fv).
Amino acid sequence diversity can be introduced into any desired region of a peptide or polypeptide or scaffold using any suitable method. For example, amino acid sequence diversity can be introduced into a target region, such as a complementarity determining region of an antibody variable domain or a hydrophobic domain, by preparing a library of nucleic acids that encode the diversified polypeptides using any suitable mutagenesis methods (e.g., low fidelity PCR, oligonucleotide-mediated or site directed mutagenesis, diversification using NNK codons) or any other suitable method. If desired, a region of a polypeptide to be diversified can be randomized. The size of the polypeptides that make up the repertoire is largely a matter of choice and uniform polypeptide size is not required. The polypeptides in the repertoire may have at least tertiary structure (form at least one domain).
An epitope binding domain or population of domains can be selected, isolated and/or recovered from a repertoire or library (e.g., in a display system) using any suitable method. For example, a domain is selected or isolated based on a selectable characteristic (e.g., physical characteristic, chemical characteristic, functional characteristic). Suitable selectable functional characteristics include biological activities of the peptides or polypeptides in the repertoire, for example, binding to a generic ligand (e.g., a superantigen), binding to a target ligand (e.g., an antigen, an epitope, a substrate), binding to an antibody (e.g., through an epitope expressed on a peptide or polypeptide), and catalytic activity. (See, e.g., Tomlinson et al., WO 99/20749; WO 01/57065; WO 99/58655.)
In some embodiments, the protease resistant peptide or polypeptide is selected and/or isolated from a library or repertoire of peptides or polypeptides in which substantially all domains share a common selectable feature. For example, the domain can be selected from a library or repertoire in which substantially all domains bind a common generic ligand, bind a common target ligand, bind (or are bound by) a common antibody, or possess a common catalytic activity. This type of selection is particularly useful for preparing a repertoire of domains that are based on a parental peptide or polypeptide that has a desired biological activity, for example, when performing affinity maturation of an immunoglobulin single variable domain.
Selection based on binding to a common generic ligand can yield a collection or population of domains that contain all or substantially all of the domains that were components of the original library or repertoire. For example, domains that bind a target ligand or a generic ligand, such as protein A, protein L or an antibody, can be selected, isolated and/or recovered by panning or using a suitable affinity matrix.
Panning can be accomplished by adding a solution of ligand (e.g., generic ligand, target ligand) to a suitable vessel (e.g., tube, petri dish) and allowing the ligand to become deposited or coated onto the walls of the vessel. Excess ligand can be washed away and domains can be added to the vessel and the vessel maintained under conditions suitable for peptides or polypeptides to bind the immobilized ligand. Unbound domains can be washed away and bound domains can be recovered using any suitable method, such as scraping or lowering the pH, for example. Suitable ligand affinity matrices generally contain a solid support or bead (e.g., agarose) to which a ligand is covalently or noncovalently attached. The affinity matrix can be combined with peptides or polypeptides (e.g., a repertoire that has been incubated with protease) using a batch process, a column process or any other suitable process under conditions suitable for binding of domains to the ligand on the matrix. domains that do not bind the affinity matrix can be washed away and bound domains can be eluted and recovered using any suitable method, such as elution with a lower pH buffer, with a mild denaturing agent (e.g., urea), or with a peptide or domain that competes for binding to the ligand. In one example, a biotinylated target ligand is combined with a repertoire under conditions suitable for domains in the repertoire to bind the target ligand. Bound domains are recovered using immobilized avidin or streptavidin (e.g., on a bead).
In some embodiments, the generic or target ligand is an antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof. Antibodies or antigen binding fragments that bind structural features of peptides or polypeptides that are substantially conserved in the peptides or polypeptides of a library or repertoire are particularly useful as generic ligands. Antibodies and antigen binding fragments suitable for use as ligands for isolating, selecting and/or recovering protease resistant peptides or polypeptides can be monoclonal or polyclonal and can be prepared using any suitable method.
Libraries that encode and/or contain protease epitope binding domains can be prepared or obtained using any suitable method. A library can be designed to encode domains based on a domain or scaffold of interest (e.g., a domain selected from a library) or can be selected from another library using the methods described herein. For example, a library enriched in domains can be prepared using a suitable polypeptide display system.
Libraries that encode a repertoire of a desired type of domain can readily be produced using any suitable method. For example, a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a desired type of polypeptide (e.g., an immunoglobulin variable domain) can be obtained and a collection of nucleic acids that each contain one or more mutations can be prepared, for example by amplifying the nucleic acid using an error-prone polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system, by chemical mutagenesis (Deng et al., J. Biol. Chem., 269:9533 (1994)) or using bacterial mutator strains (Low et al., J. Mol. Biol., 260:359 (1996)).
In other embodiments, particular regions of the nucleic acid can be targeted for diversification. Methods for mutating selected positions are also well known in the art and include, for example, the use of mismatched oligonucleotides or degenerate oligonucleotides, with or without the use of PCR. For example, synthetic antibody libraries have been created by targeting mutations to the antigen binding loops. Random or semi-random antibody H3 and L3 regions have been appended to germline immunoblulin V gene segments to produce large libraries with unmutated framework regions (Hoogenboom and Winter (1992) supra; Nissim et al. (1994) supra; Griffiths et al. (1994) supra; DeKruif et al. (1995) supra). Such diversification has been extended to include some or all of the other antigen binding loops (Crameri et al. (1996) Nature Med., 2:100; Riechmann et al. (1995) Bio/Technology, 13:475; Morphosys, WO 97/08320, supra). In other embodiments, particular regions of the nucleic acid can be targeted for diversification by, for example, a two-step PCR strategy employing the product of the first PCR as a “mega-primer.” (See, e.g., Landt, O. et al., Gene 96:125-128 (1990).) Targeted diversification can also be accomplished, for example, by SOE PCR. (See, e.g., Horton, R. M. et al., Gene 77:61-68 (1989).)
Sequence diversity at selected positions can be achieved by altering the coding sequence which specifies the sequence of the polypeptide such that a number of possible amino acids (e.g., all 20 or a subset thereof) can be incorporated at that position. Using the IUPAC nomenclature, the most versatile codon is NNK, which encodes all amino acids as well as the TAG stop codon. The NNK codon may be used in order to introduce the required diversity. Other codons which achieve the same ends are also of use, including the NNN codon, which leads to the production of the additional stop codons TGA and TAA. Such a targeted approach can allow the full sequence space in a target area to be explored.
Some libraries comprise domains that are members of the immunoglobulin superfamily (e.g., antibodies or portions thereof). For example the libraries can comprise domains that have a known main-chain conformation. (See, e.g., Tomlinson et al., WO 99/20749.) Libraries can be prepared in a suitable plasmid or vector. As used herein, vector refers to a discrete element that is used to introduce heterologous DNA into cells for the expression and/or replication thereof. Any suitable vector can be used, including plasmids (e.g., bacterial plasmids), viral or bacteriophage vectors, artificial chromosomes and episomal vectors. Such vectors may be used for simple cloning and mutagenesis, or an expression vector can be used to drive expression of the library. Vectors and plasmids usually contain one or more cloning sites (e.g., a polylinker), an origin of replication and at least one selectable marker gene. Expression vectors can further contain elements to drive transcription and translation of a polypeptide, such as an enhancer element, promoter, transcription termination signal, signal sequences, and the like. These elements can be arranged in such a way as to be operably linked to a cloned insert encoding a polypeptide, such that the polypeptide is expressed and produced when such an expression vector is maintained under conditions suitable for expression (e.g., in a suitable host cell).
Cloning and expression vectors generally contain nucleic acid sequences that enable the vector to replicate in one or more selected host cells. Typically in cloning vectors, this sequence is one that enables the vector to replicate independently of the host chromosomal DNA and includes origins of replication or autonomously replicating sequences. Such sequences are well known for a variety of bacteria, yeast and viruses. The origin of replication from the plasmid pBR322 is suitable for most Gram-negative bacteria, the 2 micron plasmid origin is suitable for yeast, and various viral origins (e.g. SV40, adenovirus) are useful for cloning vectors in mammalian cells. Generally, the origin of replication is not needed for mammalian expression vectors, unless these are used in mammalian cells able to replicate high levels of DNA, such as COS cells.
Cloning or expression vectors can contain a selection gene also referred to as selectable marker. Such marker genes encode a protein necessary for the survival or growth of transformed host cells grown in a selective culture medium. Host cells not transformed with the vector containing the selection gene will therefore not survive in the culture medium. Typical selection genes encode proteins that confer resistance to antibiotics and other toxins, e.g. ampicillin, neomycin, methotrexate or tetracycline, complement auxotrophic deficiencies, or supply critical nutrients not available in the growth media.
Suitable expression vectors can contain a number of components, for example, an origin of replication, a selectable marker gene, one or more expression control elements, such as a transcription control element (e.g., promoter, enhancer, terminator) and/or one or more translation signals, a signal sequence or leader sequence, and the like. Expression control elements and a signal or leader sequence, if present, can be provided by the vector or other source. For example, the transcriptional and/or translational control sequences of a cloned nucleic acid encoding an antibody chain can be used to direct expression.
A promoter can be provided for expression in a desired host cell. Promoters can be constitutive or inducible. For example, a promoter can be operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding an antibody, antibody chain or portion thereof, such that it directs transcription of the nucleic acid. A variety of suitable promoters for procaryotic (e.g., the β-lactamase and lactose promoter systems, alkaline phosphatase, the tryptophan (trp) promoter system, lac, tac, T3, T7 promoters for E. coli) and eucaryotic (e.g., simian virus 40 early or late promoter, Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat promoter, cytomegalovirus promoter, adenovirus late promoter, EG-1a promoter) hosts are available.
In addition, expression vectors typically comprise a selectable marker for selection of host cells carrying the vector, and, in the case of a replicable expression vector, an origin of replication. Genes encoding products which confer antibiotic or drug resistance are common selectable markers and may be used in procaryotic (e.g., β-lactamase gene (ampicillin resistance), Tet gene for tetracycline resistance) and eucaryotic cells (e.g., neomycin (G418 or geneticin), gpt (mycophenolic acid), ampicillin, or hygromycin resistance genes). Dihydrofolate reductase marker genes permit selection with methotrexate in a variety of hosts. Genes encoding the gene product of auxotrophic markers of the host (e.g., LEU2, URA3, HIS3) are often used as selectable markers in yeast. Use of viral (e.g., baculovirus) or phage vectors, and vectors which are capable of integrating into the genome of the host cell, such as retroviral vectors, are also contemplated.
Suitable expression vectors for expression in prokaryotic (e.g., bacterial cells such as E. coli) or mammalian cells include, for example, a pET vector (e.g., pET-12a, pET-36, pET-37, pET-39, pET-40, Novagen and others), a phage vector (e.g., pCANTAB 5 E, Pharmacia), pRIT2T (Protein A fusion vector, Pharmacia), pCDM8, pCDNA1.1/amp, pcDNA3.1, pRc/RSV, pEF-1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.), pCMV-SCRIPT, pFB, pSG5, pXT1 (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.), pCDEF3 (Goldman, L. A., et al., Biotechniques, 21:1013-1015 (1996)), pSVSPORT (GibcoBRL, Rockville, Md.), pEF-Bos (Mizushima, S., et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 18:5322 (1990)) and the like. Expression vectors which are suitable for use in various expression hosts, such as prokaryotic cells (E. coli), insect cells (Drosophila Schnieder S2 cells, Sf9), yeast (P. methanolica, P. pastoris, S. cerevisiae) and mammalian cells (eg, COS cells) are available.
Some examples of vectors are expression vectors that enable the expression of a nucleotide sequence corresponding to a polypeptide library member. Thus, selection with generic and/or target ligands can be performed by separate propagation and expression of a single clone expressing the polypeptide library member. As described above, a particular selection display system is bacteriophage display. Thus, phage or phagemid vectors may be used, for example vectors may be phagemid vectors which have an E. coli. origin of replication (for double stranded replication) and also a phage origin of replication (for production of single-stranded DNA). The manipulation and expression of such vectors is well known in the art (Hoogenboom and Winter (1992) supra; Nissim et al. (1994) supra). Briefly, the vector can contain a β-lactamase gene to confer selectivity on the phagemid and a lac promoter upstream of an expression cassette that can contain a suitable leader sequence, a multiple cloning site, one or more peptide tags, one or more TAG stop codons and the phage protein pIII. Thus, using various suppressor and non-suppressor strains of E. coli and with the addition of glucose, iso-propyl thio-β-D-galactoside (IPTG) or a helper phage, such as VCS M13, the vector is able to replicate as a plasmid with no expression, produce large quantities of the polypeptide library member only or product phage, some of which contain at least one copy of the polypeptide-pIII fusion on their surface.
Antibody variable domains may comprise a target ligand binding site and/or a generic ligand binding site. In certain embodiments, the generic ligand binding site is a binding site for a superantigen, such as protein A, protein L or protein G. The variable domains can be based on any desired variable domain, for example a human VH (e.g., VH1a, VH1b, VH2, VH3, VH4, VH5, VH6), a human Vλ (e.g., Vλ1, VλII, VλIII, VλIV, VλV, VλVI or Vκ1) or a human Vκ (e.g., Vκ2, Vκ3, Vκ4, Vκ5, Vκ6, Vκ7, Vκ8, Vκ9 or Vκ10).
A still further category of techniques involves the selection of repertoires in artificial compartments, which allow the linkage of a gene with its gene product. For example, a selection system in which nucleic acids encoding desirable gene products may be selected in microcapsules formed by water-in-oil emulsions is described in WO99/02671, WO00/40712 and Tawfik & Griffiths (1998) Nature Biotechnol 16(7), 652-6. Genetic elements encoding a gene product having a desired activity are compartmentalised into microcapsules and then transcribed and/or translated to produce their respective gene products (RNA or protein) within the microcapsules. Genetic elements which produce gene product having desired activity are subsequently sorted. This approach selects gene products of interest by detecting the desired activity by a variety of means.
The binding of a domain to its specific antigen or epitope can be tested by methods which will be familiar to those skilled in the art and include ELISA. In one example, binding is tested using monoclonal phage ELISA.
Phage ELISA may be performed according to any suitable procedure: an exemplary protocol is set forth below.
Populations of phage produced at each round of selection can be screened for binding by ELISA to the selected antigen or epitope, to identify “polyclonal” phage antibodies. Phage from single infected bacterial colonies from these populations can then be screened by ELISA to identify “monoclonal” phage antibodies. It is also desirable to screen soluble antibody fragments for binding to antigen or epitope, and this can also be undertaken by ELISA using reagents, for example, against a C- or N-terminal tag (see for example Winter et al. (1994) Ann. Rev. Immunology 12, 433-55 and references cited therein.
The diversity of the selected phage monoclonal antibodies may also be assessed by gel electrophoresis of PCR products (Marks et al. 1991, supra; Nissim et al. 1994 supra), probing (Tomlinson et al., 1992) J. Mol. Biol. 227, 776) or by sequencing of the vector DNA.
Structure of dAbs
In the case that the dAbs are selected from V-gene repertoires selected for instance using phage display technology as herein described, then these variable domains comprise a universal framework region, such that is they may be recognised by a specific generic ligand as herein defined. The use of universal frameworks, generic ligands and the like is described in WO99/20749.
Where V-gene repertoires are used variation in polypeptide sequence may be located within the structural loops of the variable domains. The polypeptide sequences of either variable domain may be altered by DNA shuffling or by mutation in order to enhance the interaction of each variable domain with its complementary pair. DNA shuffling is known in the art and taught, for example, by Stemmer, 1994, Nature 370: 389-391 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,297,053, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Other methods of mutagenesis are well known to those of skill in the art.
Scaffolds for Use in Constructing dAbs
i. Selection of the Main-Chain Conformation
The members of the immunoglobulin superfamily all share a similar fold for their polypeptide chain. For example, although antibodies are highly diverse in terms of their primary sequence, comparison of sequences and crystallographic structures has revealed that, contrary to expectation, five of the six antigen binding loops of antibodies (H1, H2, L1, L2, L3) adopt a limited number of main-chain conformations, or canonical structures (Chothia and Lesk (1987) J. Mol. Biol., 196: 901; Chothia et al. (1989) Nature, 342: 877). Analysis of loop lengths and key residues has therefore enabled prediction of the main-chain conformations of H1, H2, L1, L2 and L3 found in the majority of human antibodies (Chothia et al. (1992) J. Mol. Biol., 227: 799; Tomlinson et al. (1995) EMBO J., 14: 4628; Williams et al. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 264: 220). Although the H3 region is much more diverse in terms of sequence, length and structure (due to the use of D segments), it also forms a limited number of main-chain conformations for short loop lengths which depend on the length and the presence of particular residues, or types of residue, at key positions in the loop and the antibody framework (Martin et al. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 263: 800; Shirai et al. (1996) FEBS Letters, 399: 1).
The dAbs are advantageously assembled from libraries of domains, such as libraries of VH domains and/or libraries of VL domains. In one aspect, libraries of domains are designed in which certain loop lengths and key residues have been chosen to ensure that the main-chain conformation of the members is known. Advantageously, these are real conformations of immunoglobulin superfamily molecules found in nature, to minimise the chances that they are non-functional, as discussed above. Germline V gene segments serve as one suitable basic framework for constructing antibody or T-cell receptor libraries; other sequences are also of use. Variations may occur at a low frequency, such that a small number of functional members may possess an altered main-chain conformation, which does not affect its function.
Canonical structure theory is also of use to assess the number of different main-chain conformations encoded by ligands, to predict the main-chain conformation based on ligand sequences and to chose residues for diversification which do not affect the canonical structure. It is known that, in the human VK domain, the L1 loop can adopt one of four canonical structures, the L2 loop has a single canonical structure and that 90% of human VK domains adopt one of four or five canonical structures for the L3 loop (Tomlinson et al. (1995) supra); thus, in the VK domain alone, different canonical structures can combine to create a range of different main-chain conformations. Given that the Vλ domain encodes a different range of canonical structures for the L1, L2 and L3 loops and that VK and Vλ domains can pair with any VH domain which can encode several canonical structures for the H1 and H2 loops, the number of canonical structure combinations observed for these five loops is very large. This implies that the generation of diversity in the main-chain conformation may be essential for the production of a wide range of binding specificities. However, by constructing an antibody library based on a single known main-chain conformation it has been found, contrary to expectation, that diversity in the main-chain conformation is not required to generate sufficient diversity to target substantially all antigens. Even more surprisingly, the single main-chain conformation need not be a consensus structure—a single naturally occurring conformation can be used as the basis for an entire library. Thus, in a one particular aspect, the dAbs possess a single known main-chain conformation.
The single main-chain conformation that is chosen may be commonplace among molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily type in question. A conformation is commonplace when a significant number of naturally occurring molecules are observed to adopt it. Accordingly, in one aspect, the natural occurrence of the different main-chain conformations for each binding loop of an immunoglobulin domain are considered separately and then a naturally occurring variable domain is chosen which possesses the desired combination of main-chain conformations for the different loops. If none is available, the nearest equivalent may be chosen. The desired combination of main-chain conformations for the different loops may be created by selecting germline gene segments which encode the desired main-chain conformations. In one example, the selected germline gene segments are frequently expressed in nature, and in particular they may be the most frequently expressed of all natural germline gene segments.
In designing libraries the incidence of the different main-chain conformations for each of the six antigen binding loops may be considered separately. For H1, H2, L1, L2 and L3, a given conformation that is adopted by between 20% and 100% of the antigen binding loops of naturally occurring molecules is chosen. Typically, its observed incidence is above 35% (i.e. between 35% and 100%) and, ideally, above 50% or even above 65%. Since the vast majority of H3 loops do not have canonical structures, it is preferable to select a main-chain conformation which is commonplace among those loops which do display canonical structures. For each of the loops, the conformation which is observed most often in the natural repertoire is therefore selected. In human antibodies, the most popular canonical structures (CS) for each loop are as follows: H1-CS 1 (79% of the expressed repertoire), H2-CS 3 (46%), L1-CS 2 of VK(39%), L2-CS 1 (100%), L3-CS 1 of VK(36%) (calculation assumes a κ:λ ratio of 70:30, Hood et al. (1967) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 48: 133). For H3 loops that have canonical structures, a CDR3 length (Kabat et al. (1991) Sequences of proteins of immunological interest, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) of seven residues with a salt-bridge from residue 94 to residue 101 appears to be the most common. There are at least 16 human antibody sequences in the EMBL data library with the required H3 length and key residues to form this conformation and at least two crystallographic structures in the protein data bank which can be used as a basis for antibody modelling (2 cgr and 1 tet). The most frequently expressed germline gene segments that this combination of canonical structures are the VH segment 3-23 (DP-47), the JH segment JH4b, the Vκ segment O2/O12 (DPK9) and the Jκ segment Jκ1. VH segments DP45 and DP38 are also suitable. These segments can therefore be used in combination as a basis to construct a library with the desired single main-chain conformation.
Alternatively, instead of choosing the single main-chain conformation based on the natural occurrence of the different main-chain conformations for each of the binding loops in isolation, the natural occurrence of combinations of main-chain conformations is used as the basis for choosing the single main-chain conformation. In the case of antibodies, for example, the natural occurrence of canonical structure combinations for any two, three, four, five, or for all six of the antigen binding loops can be determined. Here, the chosen conformation may be commonplace in naturally occurring antibodies and may be observed most frequently in the natural repertoire. Thus, in human antibodies, for example, when natural combinations of the five antigen binding loops, H1, H2, L1, L2 and L3, are considered, the most frequent combination of canonical structures is determined and then combined with the most popular conformation for the H3 loop, as a basis for choosing the single main-chain conformation.
Having selected several known main-chain conformations or a single known main-chain conformation, dAbs can be constructed by varying the binding site of the molecule in order to generate a repertoire with structural and/or functional diversity. This means that variants are generated such that they possess sufficient diversity in their structure and/or in their function so that they are capable of providing a range of activities.
The desired diversity is typically generated by varying the selected molecule at one or more positions. The positions to be changed can be chosen at random or they may be selected. The variation can then be achieved either by randomization, during which the resident amino acid is replaced by any amino acid or analogue thereof, natural or synthetic, producing a very large number of variants or by replacing the resident amino acid with one or more of a defined subset of amino acids, producing a more limited number of variants.
Various methods have been reported for introducing such diversity. Error-prone PCR (Hawkins et al. (1992) J. Mol. Biol., 226: 889), chemical mutagenesis (Deng et al. (1994) J. Biol. Chem., 269: 9533) or bacterial mutator strains (Low et al. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 260: 359) can be used to introduce random mutations into the genes that encode the molecule. Methods for mutating selected positions are also well known in the art and include the use of mismatched oligonucleotides or degenerate oligonucleotides, with or without the use of PCR. For example, several synthetic antibody libraries have been created by targeting mutations to the antigen binding loops. The H3 region of a human tetanus toxoid-binding Fab has been randomised to create a range of new binding specificities (Barbas et al. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 4457). Random or semi-random H3 and L3 regions have been appended to germline V gene segments to produce large libraries with unmutated framework regions (Hoogenboom & Winter (1992) J. Mol. Biol., 227: 381; Barbas et al. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 4457; Nissim et al. (1994) EMBO J., 13: 692; Griffiths et al. (1994) EMBO J., 13: 3245; De Kruif et al. (1995) J. Mol. Biol., 248: 97). Such diversification has been extended to include some or all of the other antigen binding loops (Crameri et al. (1996) Nature Med., 2: 100; Riechmann et al. (1995) Bio/Technology, 13: 475; Morphosys, WO97/08320, supra).
Since loop randomization has the potential to create approximately more than 1015 structures for H3 alone and a similarly large number of variants for the other five loops, it is not feasible using current transformation technology or even by using cell free systems to produce a library representing all possible combinations. For example, in one of the largest libraries constructed to date, 6×1010 different antibodies, which is only a fraction of the potential diversity for a library of this design, were generated (Griffiths et al. (1994) supra).
In a one embodiment, only those residues which are directly involved in creating or modifying the desired function of the molecule are diversified. For many molecules, the function will be to bind a target and therefore diversity should be concentrated in the target binding site, while avoiding changing residues which are crucial to the overall packing of the molecule or to maintaining the chosen main-chain conformation.
In one aspect, libraries of dAbs are used in which only those residues in the antigen binding site are varied. These residues are extremely diverse in the human antibody repertoire and are known to make contacts in high-resolution antibody/antigen complexes. For example, in L2 it is known that positions 50 and 53 are diverse in naturally occurring antibodies and are observed to make contact with the antigen. In contrast, the conventional approach would have been to diversify all the residues in the corresponding Complementarity Determining Region (CDR1) as defined by Kabat et al. (1991, supra), some seven residues compared to the two diversified in the library. This represents a significant improvement in terms of the functional diversity required to create a range of antigen binding specificities.
In nature, antibody diversity is the result of two processes: somatic recombination of germline V, D and J gene segments to create a naive primary repertoire (so called germline and junctional diversity) and somatic hypermutation of the resulting rearranged V genes. Analysis of human antibody sequences has shown that diversity in the primary repertoire is focused at the centre of the antigen binding site whereas somatic hypermutation spreads diversity to regions at the periphery of the antigen binding site that are highly conserved in the primary repertoire (see Tomlinson et al. (1996) J. Mol. Biol., 256: 813). This complementarity has probably evolved as an efficient strategy for searching sequence space and, although apparently unique to antibodies, it can easily be applied to other polypeptide repertoires. The residues which are varied are a subset of those that form the binding site for the target. Different (including overlapping) subsets of residues in the target binding site are diversified at different stages during selection, if desired.
In the case of an antibody repertoire, an initial ‘naive’ repertoire is created where some, but not all, of the residues in the antigen binding site are diversified. As used herein in this context, the term “naive” or “dummy” refers to antibody molecules that have no pre-determined target. These molecules resemble those which are encoded by the immunoglobulin genes of an individual who has not undergone immune diversification, as is the case with fetal and newborn individuals, whose immune systems have not yet been challenged by a wide variety of antigenic stimuli. This repertoire is then selected against a range of antigens or epitopes. If required, further diversity can then be introduced outside the region diversified in the initial repertoire. This matured repertoire can be selected for modified function, specificity or affinity.
It will be understood that the sequences described herein include sequences which are substantially identical, for example sequences which are at least 90% identical, for example which are at least 91%, or at least 92%, or at least 93%, or at least 94% or at least 95%, or at least 96%, or at least 97% or at least 98%, or at least 99% identical to the sequences described herein.
For nucleic acids, the term “substantial identity” indicates that two nucleic acids, or designated sequences thereof, when optimally aligned and compared, are identical, with appropriate nucleotide insertions or deletions, in at least about 80% of the nucleotides, usually at least about 90% to 95%, or at least about 98% to 99.5% of the nucleotides. Alternatively, substantial identity exists when the segments will hybridize under selective hybridization conditions, to the complement of the strand.
For nucleotide and amino acid sequences, the term “identical” indicates the degree of identity between two nucleic acid or amino acid sequences when optimally aligned and compared with appropriate insertions or deletions. Alternatively, substantial identity exists when the DNA segments will hybridize under selective hybridization conditions, to the complement of the strand.
The percent identity between two sequences is a function of the number of identical positions shared by the sequences (i.e., % identity=# of identical positions/total # of positions times 100), taking into account the number of gaps, and the length of each gap, which need to be introduced for optimal alignment of the two sequences. The comparison of sequences and determination of percent identity between two sequences can be accomplished using a mathematical algorithm, as described in the non-limiting examples below.
The percent identity between two nucleotide sequences can be determined using the GAP program in the GCG software package, using a NWSgapdna.CMP matrix and a gap weight of 40, 50, 60, 70, or 80 and a length weight of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. The percent identity between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences can also be determined using the algorithm of E. Meyers and W. Miller (Comput. Appl. Biosci., 4:11-17 (1988)) which has been incorporated into the ALIGN program (version 2.0), using a PAM120 weight residue table, a gap length penalty of 12 and a gap penalty of 4. In addition, the percent identity between two amino acid sequences can be determined using the Needleman and Wunsch (J. Mol. Biol. 48:444-453 (1970)) algorithm which has been incorporated into the GAP program in the GCG software package, using either a Blossum 62 matrix or a PAM250 matrix, and a gap weight of 16, 14, 12, 10, 8, 6, or 4 and a length weight of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6.
By way of example, a polypeptide sequence of the present invention may be identical to the reference sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO: 38, that is be 100% identical, or it may include up to a certain integer number of amino acid alterations as compared to the reference sequence such that the % identity is less than 100%. Such alterations are selected from the group consisting of at least one amino acid deletion, substitution, including conservative and non-conservative substitution, or insertion, and wherein said alterations may occur at the amino- or carboxy-terminal positions of the reference polypeptide sequence or anywhere between those terminal positions, interspersed either individually among the amino acids in the reference sequence or in one or more contiguous groups within the reference sequence. The number of amino acid alterations for a given % identity is determined by multiplying the total number of amino acids in the polypeptide sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO: 38 by the numerical percent of the respective percent identity (divided by 100) and then subtracting that product from said total number of amino acids in the polypeptide sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO: 38, or:
na≦xa−(xa·y),
wherein na is the number of amino acid alterations, xa is the total number of amino acids in the polypeptide sequence encoded by SEQ ID NO: 38, and y is, for instance 0.70 for 70%, 0.80 for 80%, 0.85 for 85% etc., and wherein any non-integer product of xa and y is rounded down to the nearest integer prior to subtracting it from xa.
A codon-optimised DNA sequence encoding the variable regions of the anti-HGF monoclonal antibodies were constructed and cloned into expression vectors. Variable region sequences were constructed de novo using a PCR-based strategy and overlapping oligonucleotides. PCR primers were designed to incorporate the signal sequence (SEQ ID NO: 33) and to include restriction sites required for cloning into mammalian expression vectors. Hind III and SpeI sites were designed to frame the VH domain and allow cloning into mammalian expression vectors containing the human γ1 C region alone or the human γ1 C region fused at the C-terminus to a VEGF dAb (SEQ ID NO: 25) via a TVAAPSGS linker. HindIII and BsiWI sites were designed to frame the VL domain and allow cloning into mammalian expression vectors containing the human kappa C region alone or the human kappa C region fused at the C-terminus to a VEGF dAb (SEQ ID NO: 25) via a TVAAPSGS linker.
Table 1 below is a summary of the anti-HGF mAbs and anti-HGF-VEGF bispecific antigen binding proteins that have been constructed.
Expression plasmids encoding the heavy chain and the light chains for BPC2013, BPC2014, BPC2015, BPC2021, BPC2022, BPC2023, BPC2024, BPC2025, and BPC2026 were transiently co-transfected into HEK 293-6E cells using 293 fectin (Invitrogen, 12347019). A tryptone feed was added to the cell culture after 24 hours and the cells were harvested after a further 72-120 hours. In some instances the supernatant material was used as the test article in binding assays. In other instances, the bispecific antigen binding protein was purified using a Protein A column before being tested in binding assays.
96-well high binding plates were coated with 50 μl/well of recombinant human HGF (R&D Systems) at 100 ng/mL and incubated at +4° C. overnight. All subsequent steps were carried out at room temperature. The plates were washed 3 times with Tris-Buffered Saline with 0.05% of Tween-20. 80 μL of blocking solution (1% BSA in Tris-Buffered Saline with 0.05% of Tween-20) was added to each well and the plates were incubated for at least 1 hour at room temperature. Another wash step was then performed. The supernatants or purified antibodies were successively diluted across the plates in blocking solution. After 1 hour incubation, the plate was washed. Goat anti-human kappa light chain specific peroxidase conjugated antibody (Sigma A7164) was diluted in blocking solution to 0.75 μg/mL and 50 μL was added to each well. The plates were incubated for one hour. After another wash step, 50 μl of OPD (o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride) SigmaFast substrate solution were added to each well and the reaction was stopped by addition of 25 μL of 3M sulphuric acid. Absorbance was read at 490 nm using the VersaMax Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices) using a basic endpoint protocol.
96-well high binding plates were coated with 50 μl/well of human VEGF at 0.4 μg/mL and incubated at +4° C. overnight. All subsequent steps were carried out at room temperature. The plates were washed 3 times with Tris-Buffered Saline with 0.05% of Tween-20. 80 μL of blocking solution (1% BSA in Tris-Buffered Saline with 0.05% of Tween-20) was added to each well and the plates were incubated for at least 1 hour at room temperature. Another wash step was then performed. The supernatants or purified antibodies were successively diluted across the plates in blocking solution. After 1 hour incubation, the plate was washed. Goat anti-human kappa light chain specific peroxidase conjugated antibody was diluted in blocking solution to 0.75 μg/mL and 50 μL was added to each well. The plates were incubated for one hour. After another wash step, 50 μl of OPD (o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride) SigmaFast substrate solution were added to each well and the reaction was stopped by addition of 25 μL of 3M sulphuric acid. Absorbance was read at 490 nm using the VersaMax Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices) using a basic endpoint protocol.
Biacore analysis was carried out using a capture surface on a C1 chip. Protein A was used as the capturing agent and coupled to a C1 biosensor chip by primary amine coupling. Antibodies were captured on the immobilised surface and defined concentrations of human VEGF (256, 64, 16, 4, 1, 0.25 nM) were passed over this captured surface. An injection of buffer over the captured antibody surface was used for double referencing. The captured surface was regenerated, after each VEGF injection using 100 mM Sodium Hydroxide; the regeneration removed the captured antibody but did not significantly affect the ability of the surface to capture antibody in a subsequent cycle. All runs were carried out at 25° C. using HBS-EP buffer. Data were generated using the Biacore T100 (GE Healthcare) and fitted to the 1:1 binding model inherent to the software. The bispecific antigen binding proteins BPC2021-2026 show high affinity binding to human VEGF whilst the negative control HGF antibodies (BPC2013-2015) show no binding to human VEGF.
Biacore analysis was carried out using human HGF (made in-house) immobilized on a CM5 chip by primary amine coupling. Antibodies were passed over the immobilised surface at defined concentrations (500, 125, 31.3, 7.8, 1.95, 0.46 nM). An injection of buffer over the human HGF immobilized surface was used for double referencing. The immobilized surface was regenerated, after each antibody injection using 100 mM Phosphoric Acid; the regeneration removed the bound antibody but did not significantly affect the ability of the surface to bind antibody in a subsequent cycle. All runs were carried out at 25° C. using HBS-EP buffer. Data were generated using the Biacore T100 (GE Healthcare) and fitted to the 1:1 binding model and the bivalent analyte model inherent to the software. The bispecific antibody samples BPC2021-2026 and parental HGF antibodies BPC2013-2015 all show high affinity binding to human HGF.
Bx-PC3 cells were seeded in Costar 96 well plates at 100,000 cells/ml (10000 cells/100 μl/well) in RPMI supplemented with glutamine and 10% FCS and incubated for 16 hours at 37° C./5% CO2. The cells were washed with 100 μl PBS and 100 μl RPMI serum free medium added, with further incubation for a further 16 hours at 37° C./5% CO2. The test samples BPC2015, BPC2023-BPC2026 or controls (BPC1007 & BPC1023) were added to cells in duplicate at various concentrations up to 30 μg/ml. After 15 minutes, HGF (in-house) to a final concentration of 200 ng/ml was added at 37° C./5% CO2. Finally, the medium was removed, cells washed with 100 μl ice cold PBS and lysed with cold lysis buffer (supplied with the Cell Signalling Path-Scan Phospho-Met sandwich ELISA kit, 7333). MET phosphorylation was assayed using a Cell Signalling pMET ELISA according to the manufacturer's protocol (Cell Signalling Path-Scan Phospho-Met Sandwich ELISA kit, 7333).
This assay was run subsequently with the same HGF mAbs and anti-HGF/VEGF mAb-dAbs. The assay conditions were identical to the previous runs. The anti-HGF mAbs and the anti-HGF/anti-VEGF mAbdAb both inhibited HGF-mediated MET phosphorylation. The negative controls had no effect on the inhibition of MET phosphorylation. The IC50s represent the effect of the antibodies on MET phosphorylation. The mean IC50s from three independent experiments are shown in Table 4
This assay was run subsequently with HGF mAb (BPC2015) anti-irrelevant/VEGF mAb-dAb and anti-HGF/VEGF mAb-dAb(BPC2025) (from 667 nM titrated in 4-fold dilutions to 0.01 nM). The assay conditions were identical to the previous runs, except that the cells were incubated with these test mAb/mAbdAb for only 1 hour, 40 ng/ml of HGF was used and cell signaling was measured by MesoScale Discovery platform (MSD).
The anti-HGF mAb and the anti-HGF/anti-VEGF mAbdAb both inhibited HGF-mediated MET phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner. A control mAb and an irrelevant mAb-VEGF dAb had no effect on the inhibition of MET phosphorylation. The IC50s represent the effect of the antibodies on % phospho MET—((pMET raw MSD units/Total raw MET units)*100). The mean IC50s from two independent experiments for the HGF mAb (BPC2015) was 0.40 nM, and for the mAbdAb (BPC2025) was 0.34 nM.
This example is prophetic. It provides guidance for carrying out an additional assay in which the antigen binding proteins of the invention can be tested,
Anti-human IgG is immobilised onto a CM5 biosensor chip by primary amine coupling. Antigen binding proteins are captured onto this surface after which a single concentration of HGF or VEGF is passed over, this concentration is enough to saturate the binding surface and the binding signal observed reached full R-max. Stoichiometries are then calculated using the given formula:
Stoich=Rmax*Mw(ligand)/Mw(analyte)*R(ligand immobilised or captured)
Where the stoichiometries are calculated for more than one analyte binding at the same time, the different antigens are passed over sequentially at the saturating antigen concentration and the stoichometries calculated as above. The work can be carried out on the Biacore 3000, at 25° C. using HBS-EP running buffer.
TGF-beta inhibits Mv1 Lu cell proliferation. This is overcome by the addition of HGF. Hence, this assay assesses the capacity of HGF neutralizing antibodies to inhibit HGF-mediated cell proliferation. The CellTiterGlo™ assay yields a bioluminescent signal which is ATP-dependent and hence proportional to total cell number. The differential between “+TGF-beta+HGF” and “+TGF-beta−HGF” reflects HGF-mediated cell proliferation. (J. Immunol. Methods 1996, Jan. 16, Vol 189 (1); 59-64)
Mv1 Lu cells (ATCC) were incubated in serum-free medium supplemented with 40 ng/ml human HGF and 1 ng/ml TGF-beta (R&D Systems). HGF was omitted from control wells as appropriate. All runs were done in the presence of TGFbeta. All runs were done in the presence of HGF, except for the negative control run designated ‘HGF−’.
Antibody or mAbdAb constructs were added at a final concentration of 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.06 or 0.03 μg/ml. Total cell number was determined after 48 h using a luminescent ATP-dependent assay in which bioluminescence signal is proportional to viable cell number (CellTiterGlo, Promega). All conditions were tested in triplicate.
Data shown in
The anti-HGF monoclonal antibody (BPC2015) abrogated HGF-mediated Mv1 Lu cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. To confirm that this HGF-neutralizing capacity was retained in a mAbdAb format, a direct comparison was made using a mAbdAb construct comprising an anti-HGF monoclonal antibody moiety and an anti-VEGF dAb moiety (BPC2025). Treatment with the mAbdAb construct resulted in dose-dependent abrogation of HGF-mediated Mv1 Lu cell proliferation that was indistinguishable from the mAb response profile (
To confirm that the observed effect was due to the specific neutralisation of HGF, a parallel experiment was performed comparing BPC2025 and another mAbdAb construct comprising a monoclonal antibody moiety targeting an assay-irrelevant protein and an anti-VEGF dAb in an identical dose titration. No effect of the anti-irrelevant/VEGF mAbdAb was observed (
The data show that the anti-HGF mAb abrogates HGF-dependent cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner and that this activity is retained when in a mAbdAb format.
Cellular invasion was assessed using the Oris Cell Invasion system and were performed as directed by the manufacturer (Platypus). Briefly, 130,000 BxPC3 cells (ATCC) per well were seeded in extracellular matrix-coated 96 well plates in the presence of well plugs to generate a circular acellular region. After cell adherence, plugs were removed and wells washed and overlaid with extracellular matrix to provide a 3-dimensional cellular environment. Plates were incubated to permit matrix polymerisation and wells were overlaid with growth medium (RPMI (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated foetal calf serum, glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin) containing 20 ng/ml human HGF. HGF was omitted from control wells as appropriate. Antibody or mAbdAb constructs were added at a concentration range of 20, 10, 5 or 2.5 μg/ml. Plates were incubated for 72 h prior to image analysis to quantitate the pixel area of the remaining acellular region. All conditions were tested in at least triplicate.
Images of all wells were acquired and subjected to image analysis to permit qualitative and quantitative assessment of invasion. Qualitative comparison of the remaining acellular region following incubation for 72 h confirmed an HGF-dependent invasive response of BxPC3 cells manifested as an apparent decrease in the acellular area and non-uniform multicellular projections resulting from extracellular matrix degradation and cell invasion. The quantitative analysis shown in
The Angiokit™ is a commercially-available co-culture assay of endothelial cells and fibroblasts and can be used to test the capacity of putative anti-angiogenic agents to inhibit one or more parameters related to endothelial network formation in vitro. These parameters are quantitated using image analysis and include e.g. total endothelial cell area (field area), number of vessel branch points, mean tubule length, etc.
Angiogenesis co-culture assays (Angiokit™) were performed as directed by the manufacturer (TCS Cellworks). Briefly, medium was aspirated from 24 well format Angiokit™ co-culture plates and replaced with full growth medium with or without supplementation with 20 ng/ml human HGF. Test compounds were added to achieve comparable final molar concentrations of 0.17 μM of each construct. Medium and test compounds were replaced on days 4, 7 and 9. Cells were fixed on day 11 and endothelial cell networks visualised by anti-CD31 immunocytochemistry as directed by the manufacturer. Images were recorded by light microscopy and image analysis performed using AngioSys software (TCS Cellworks).
The effects of HGF-antagonism on various angiogenic processes (BPC2015) or with an isotype control monoclonal antibody (mAb negative ctrl). The HGF mAb (BPC2015) was then run in the same assay alongside the anti-HGS/anti-VEGF mAbdAb (BPC2025).
Data shown in
Signal transduction through the phosphorylation of c-MET receptor is initiated by the binding of its ligand HGF. On MET phosphorylation there is activation of two principal cell signalling pathways by the recruitment and activation of various adaptor proteins. This leads to the activation of cell proliferation (MAPK/MEK/ERK pathway) and survival (PI3kinase/AKT pathway).
Bx-PC3 pancreatic cells were plated in sterile 96 well cell culture plates at 10,000 cells/well in RPMI complete medium and left overnight at 37° C./5% CO2. Cells were then incubated for 24 hours in RPMI serum free medium, prior to the addition of either control mAb, anti-HGF mAb, anti-irrelevant/VEGF mAb-dAb or anti-HGF/VEGF mAb-dAb (BPC2025) (from 667 nM titrated in 4-fold dilutions to 0.01 nM) with 40 ng/ml ‘in house’ HGF for 1 hour. Cells were lysed in MSD lysis buffer as in the manufacturer's instructions. The lysates were frozen and the levels of phosphorylated AKT assessed using a MSD pAKT/Total AKT assay (catalogue number K11100D-2), as described in the manufacturer's instructions.
The anti-HGF mAb and the anti-HGF/anti-VEGF mAbdAb both inhibited HGF-mediated AKT phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner. A control mAb and an irrelevant mAb-VEGF dAb had no effect on the inhibition of AKT phosphorylation.
The IC50s represent the effect of the antibodies on % phospho AKT—((p AKT raw MesoScale Discovery platform (MSD) units/Total raw AKT units)*100).
The mean IC50s from two independent experiments for the HGF mAb (BPC2015) was 0.63 nM, and for the mAbdAb (BPC2025) was 0.88 nM.
This assay was carried using the same method as described in Example 11, except that the cells were incubated with HGF and the test mAb/mAbdAb construct for 3 hours.
The levels of phosphorylated ERK, a downstream member of the MAPK/MEK pathway, were assessed using a MSD pERK/Total ERK assay (catalogue number K11107D-2), as described in the manufacturer's instructions.
The anti-HGF mAb and the anti-HGF/anti-VEGF mAbdAb both inhibited HGF-mediated ERK phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner. A control mAb and an irrelevant mAb-VEGF dAb had no effect on the inhibition of ERK phosphorylation. The IC50s represent the effect of the antibodies on % phospho ERK—((pERK raw MesoScale Discovery platform (MSD) units)*100).
The mean IC50s from two independent experiments for the HGF mAb (BPC2015) was 0.98 nM, and for the mAbdAb (BPC2025) was 0.92 nM.
Amsbio™ supply the Oris cell migration assay which consists of a sterile 96 well tissue culture plate with pre-inserted silicone seeding stoppers in each well. Cells are added and allowed to grow to confluence. The stopper is removed leaving a circular cell free area. Cell migration into this area is then monitored over time following the addition of migration inhibitors or promoters.
Bx-PC3 pancreatic cells were plated in an Oris cell migration 96 well plates at 100,000 cells/well in RPMI complete medium and incubated for 72 hours until confluent. Cell stoppers were removed to give a cell free area. The cells were then incubated for 24 hours in RPMI serum free medium, with either the control mAb, anti HGF mAb, anti-irrelevant/VEGF mAb or anti-HGF/VEGF mAb-dAb (BPC2025) (from 667 nM titrated in 4-fold dilutions to 0.01 nM) with 25 ng/ml HGF. Cells migration into the cell free area was then quantified with CellTracker (Invitrogen CellTracker™ Green CMFDA #C2925) on the Envision plate reader.
The mean IC50s from three independent experiments for the HGF mAb (BPC2015) was 0.33 nM, and for the mAbdAb (BPC2025) was 0.32 nM indicating that mAbdAb format did not affect the activity of the HGF binding portion.
This example is prophetic. It provides guidance for carrying out an additional assay in which the antigen binding proteins of the invention can be tested,
This example is prophetic. It provides guidance for carrying out an additional assay in which the antigen binding proteins of the invention can be tested. This assay measures VEGF-mediated phosphorylation of the VEGF receptor VEGFR2 in endothelial cells and the capacity of VEGF binding proteins to inhibit this process. Primary endothelial cells (e.g. human umbilical cord endothelial cells, Lonza) are seeded as monolayers on gelatin-coated plates and incubated overnight in full growth medium (EGM-2 Bulletkit, Lonza). Cells are serum starved for approximately four hours prior to treatment with VEGF165 (e.g., R&D Systems, Cat No: 293-VE-050) or VEGF165 pre-incubated with putative VEGF binding proteins. Cell lysates are generated after 20 minutes and phosphorylated VEGFR2 is quantitated using an appropriate method (e.g. Mesoscale Discovery Cat No: K111DJD-2) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
a and b: The effect of various HGF/VEGF dual targeting molecules (mAb-dAbs) on HGF-mediated MET phosphorylation (pMET) in Bx-PC3 cells.
a and b: Results of Mv1 Lu proliferation assay. Treatment with the mAbdAb construct compared with the mAb (
a and b: Results of the angiogenesis assay—field area (
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2010/057229 | 5/26/2010 | WO | 00 | 11/23/2011 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61181881 | May 2009 | US |
