Antiinflammatory drug and delivery device

Abstract
A drug and drug delivery system may be utilized in the treatment of vascular disease. A local delivery system is coated with rapamycin or other suitable drug, agent or compound and delivered intraluminally for the treatment and prevention of neointimal hyperplasia following percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography. The local delivery of the drugs or agents provides for increased effectiveness and lower systemic toxicity.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to drugs and drug delivery systems for the prevention and treatment of vascular disease, and more particularly to drugs and drug delivery systems for the prevention and treatment of neointimal hyperplasia.




2. Discussion of the Related Art




Many individuals suffer from circulatory disease caused by a progressive blockage of the blood vessels that perfuse the heart and other major organs with nutrients. More severe blockage of blood vessels in such individuals often leads to hypertension, ischemic injury, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Atherosclerotic lesions, which limit or obstruct coronary blood flow, are the major cause of ischemic heart disease. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is a medical procedure whose purpose is to increase blood flow through an artery. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is the predominant treatment for coronary vessel stenosis. The increasing use of this procedure is attributable to its relatively high success rate and its minimal invasiveness compared with coronary bypass surgery. A limitation associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is the abrupt closure of the vessel which may occur immediately after the procedure and restenosis which occurs gradually following the procedure. Additionally, restenosis is a chronic problem in patients who have undergone saphenous vein bypass grafting. The mechanism of acute occlusion appears to involve several factors and may result from vascular recoil with resultant closure of the artery and/or deposition of blood platelets and fibrin along the damaged length of the newly opened blood vessel.




Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is a more gradual process initiated by vascular injury. Multiple processes, including thrombosis, inflammation, growth factor and cytokine release, cell proliferation, cell migration and extracellular matrix synthesis each contribute to the restenotic process.




While the exact mechanism of restenosis is not completely understood, the general aspects of the restenosis process have been identified. In the normal arterial wall, smooth muscle cells proliferate at a low rate, approximately less than 0.1 percent per day. Smooth muscle cells in the vessel walls exist in a contractile phenotype characterized by eighty to ninety percent of the cell cytoplasmic volume occupied with the contractile apparatus. Endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, and free ribosomes are few and are located in the perinuclear region. Extracellular matrix surrounds the smooth muscle cells and is rich in heparin-like glycosylaminoglycans which are believed to be responsible for maintaining smooth muscle cells in the contractile phenotypic state (Campbell and Campbell, 1985).




Upon pressure expansion of an intracoronary balloon catheter during angioplasty, smooth muscle cells within the vessel wall become injured, initiating a thrombotic and inflammatory response. Cell derived growth factors such as platelet derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, thrombin, etc., released from platelets, invading macrophages and/or leukocytes, or directly from the smooth muscle cells provoke proliferative and migratory responses in medial smooth muscle cells. These cells undergo a change from the contractile phenotype to a synthetic phenotype characterized by only a few contractile filament bundles, extensive rough endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi and free ribosomes. Proliferation/migration usually begins within one to two days post-injury and peaks several days thereafter (Campbell and Campbell, 1987; Clowes and Schwartz, 1985).




Daughter cells migrate to the intimal layer of arterial smooth muscle and continue to proliferate and secrete significant amounts of extracellular matrix proteins. Proliferation, migration and extracellular matrix synthesis continue until the damaged endothelial layer is repaired at which time proliferation slows within the intima, usually within seven to fourteen days post-injury. The newly formed tissue is called neointima. The further vascular narrowing that occurs over the next three to six months is due primarily to negative or constrictive remodeling.




Simultaneous with local proliferation and migration, inflammatory cells invade the site of vascular injury. Within three to seven days post-injury, inflammatory cells have migrated to the deeper layers of the vessel wall. In animal models employing either balloon injury or stent implantation, inflammatory cells may persist at the site of vascular injury for at least thirty days (Tanaka et al., 1993; Edelman et al., 1998). Inflammatory cells therefore are present and may contribute to both the acute and chronic phases of restenosis.




Numerous agents have been examined for presumed anti-proliferative actions in restenosis and have shown some activity in experimental animal models. Some of the agents which have been shown to successfully reduce the extent of intimal hyperplasia in animal models include: heparin and heparin fragments (Clowes, A. W. and Karnovsky M., Nature 265: 25-26, 1977; Guyton, J. R. et al., Circ. Res., 46: 625-634, 1980; Clowes, A. W. and Clowes, M. M., Lab. Invest. 52: 611-616, 1985; Clowes, A. W. and Clowes, M. M., Circ. Res. 58: 839-845, 1986; Majesky et al., Circ. Res. 61: 296-300, 1987; Snow et al., Am. J. Pathol. 137: 313-330, 1990; Okada, T. et al., Neurosurgery 25: 92-98, 1989), colchicine (Currier, J. W. et al., Circ. 80: 11-66, 1989), taxol (Sollot, S. J. et al., J. Clin. Invest. 95: 1869-1876, 1995), angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (Powell, J. S. et al., Science, 245: 186-188, 1989), angiopeptin (Lundergan, C. F. et al. Am. J. Cardiol. 17(Suppl. B):132B-136B, 1991), cyclosporin A (Jonasson, L. et al., Proc. Natl., Acad. Sci., 85: 2303, 1988), goat-anti-rabbit PDGF antibody (Ferns, G. A. A., et al., Science 253: 1129-1132, 1991), terbinafine (Nemecek, G. M. et al., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Thera. 248: 1167-1174, 1989), trapidil (Liu, M. W. et al., Circ. 81: 1089-1093, 1990), tranilast (Fukuyama, J. et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol. 318: 327-332, 1996), interferon-gamma (Hansson, G. K. and Holm, J., Circ. 84:1266-1272, 1991), rapamycin (Marx, S. O. et al., Circ. Res. 76: 412417, 1995), corticosteroids (Colburn, M. D. et al., J. Vasc. Surg. 15: 510-518, 1992), see also Berk, B. C. et al., J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 17: 111 B-117B, 1991), ionizing radiation (Weinberger, J. et al., Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys. 36: 767-775, 1996), fusion toxins (Farb, A. et al., Circ. Res. 80: 542-550, 1997) antisense oligonucleotides (Simons, M. et al., Nature 359: 67-70, 1992) and gene vectors (Chang, M. W. et al., J. Clin. Invest. 96: 2260-2268, 1995). Anti-proliferative effects on smooth muscle cells in vitro have been demonstrated for many of these agents, including heparin and heparin conjugates, taxol, tranilast, colchicine, ACE inhibitors, fusion toxins, antisense oligonucleotides, rapamycin and ionizing radiation. Thus, agents with diverse mechanisms of smooth muscle cell inhibition may have therapeutic utility in reducing intimal hyperplasia.




However, in contrast to animal models, attempts in human angioplasty patients to prevent restenosis by systemic pharmacologic means have thus far been unsuccessful. Neither aspirin-dipyridamole, ticlopidine, anti-coagulant therapy (acute heparin, chronic warfarin, hirudin or hirulog), thromboxane receptor antagonism nor steroids have been effective in preventing restenosis, although platelet inhibitors have been effective in preventing acute reocclusion after angioplasty (Mak and Topol, 1997; Lang et al., 1991; Popma et al., 1991). The platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor, antagonist, Reopro is still under study but has not shown promising results for the reduction in restenosis following angioplasty and stenting. Other agents, which have also been unsuccessful in the prevention of restenosis, include the calcium channel antagonists, prostacyclin mimetics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, serotonin receptor antagonists, and anti-proliferative agents. These agents must be given systemically, however, and attainment of a therapeutically effective dose may not be possible; anti-proliferative (or anti-restenosis) concentrations may exceed the known toxic concentrations of these agents so that levels sufficient to produce smooth muscle inhibition may not be reached (Mak and Topol, 1997; Lang et al., 1991; Popma et al., 1991).




Additional clinical trials in which the effectiveness for preventing restenosis utilizing dietary fish oil supplements or cholesterol lowering agents has been examined showing either conflicting or negative results so that no pharmacological agents are as yet clinically available to prevent post-angioplasty restenosis (Mak and Topol, 1997; Franklin and Faxon, 1993: Serruys, P. W. et al., 1993). Recent observations suggest that the antilipid/antioxidant agent, probucol may be useful in preventing restenosis but this work requires confirmation (Tardif et al., 1997; Yokoi, et al., 1997). Probucol is presently not approved for use in the United States and a thirty-day pretreatment period would preclude its use in emergency angioplasty. Additionally, the application of ionizing radiation has shown significant promise in reducing or preventing restenosis after angioplasty in patients with stents (Teirstein et al., 1997). Currently, however, the most effective treatments for restenosis are repeat angioplasty, atherectomy or coronary artery bypass grafting, because no therapeutic agents currently have Food and Drug Administration approval for use for the prevention of post-angioplasty restenosis.




Unlike systemic pharmacologic therapy, stents have proven effective in significantly reducing restenosis. Typically, stents are balloon-expandable slotted metal tubes (usually, but not limited to, stainless steel), which, when expanded within the lumen of an angioplastied coronary artery, provide structural support through rigid scaffolding to the arterial wall. This support is helpful in maintaining vessel lumen patency. In two randomized clinical trials, stents increased angiographic success after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, by increasing minimal lumen diameter and reducing, but not eliminating, the incidence of restenosis at six months (Serruys et al., 1994; Fischman et al., 1994).




Additionally, the heparin coating of stents appears to have the added benefit of producing a reduction in sub-acute thrombosis after stent implantation (Serruys et al., 1996). Thus, sustained mechanical expansion of a stenosed coronary artery with a stent has been shown to provide some measure of restenosis prevention, and the coating of stents with heparin has demonstrated both the feasibility and the clinical usefulness of delivering drugs locally, at the site of injured tissue.




Accordingly, there exists a need for effective drugs and drug delivery systems for the effective prevention and treatment of neointimal thickening that occurs after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stent implantation.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The drugs and drug delivery systems of the present invention provide a means for overcoming the difficulties associated with the methods and devices currently in use as briefly described above.




In accordance with one aspect, the present invention is directed to a method for the treatment of intimal hyperplasia in vessel walls. The method comprises the controlled delivery, by release from an intraluminal medical device, of an anti-inflammatory agent in therapeutic dosage amounts.




In accordance with another aspect, the present invention is directed to a drug delivery device. The drug delivery device comprises an intraluminal medical device and a therapeutic dosage of an agent releasably affixed to the intraluminal medical device for the treatment of inflammation caused by injury.




In accordance with another aspect, the present invention is directed to a method for the treatment of inflammation in vessel walls. The method comprises the controlled delivery, by release from an intraluminal medical device, of an anti-inflammatory agent in therapeutic dosage amounts.




The drugs and drug delivery systems of the present invention utilize a stent or graft in combination with rapamycin or other drugs/agents/compounds to prevent and treat neointimal hyperplasia, i.e. restenosis, following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stent implantation. It has been determined that rapamycin functions to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation through a number of mechanisms. It has also been determined that rapamycin eluting stent coatings produce superior effects in humans, when compared to animals, with respect to the magnitude and duration of the reduction in neointimal hyperplasia. Rapamycin administration from a local delivery platform also produces an anti-inflammatory effect in the vessel wall that is distinct from and complimentary to its smooth muscle cell anti-proliferative effect. In addition, it has also been demonstrated that rapamycin inhibits constrictive vascular remodeling in humans.




Other drugs, agents or compounds which mimic certain actions of rapamycin may also be utilized in combination with local delivery systems or platforms.




The local administration of drugs, agents or compounds to stented vessels have the additional therapeutic benefit of higher tissue concentration than that which would be achievable through the systemic administration of the same drugs, agents or compounds. Other benefits include reduced systemic toxicity, single treatment, and ease of administration. An additional benefit of a local delivery device and drug, agent or compound therapy may be to reduce the dose of the therapeutic drugs, agents or compounds and thus limit their toxicity, while still achieving a reduction in restenosis.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.





FIG. 1

is a chart indicating the effectiveness of rapamycin as an anti-inflammatory relative to other anti-inflammatories.





FIG. 2

is a view along the length of a stent (ends not shown) prior to expansion showing the exterior surface of the stent and the characteristic banding pattern.





FIG. 3

is a perspective view of the stent of

FIG. 1

having reservoirs in accordance with the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




As stated above, the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in response to mitogenic stimuli that are released during balloon angioplasty and stent implantation is the primary cause of neointimal hyperplasia. Excessive neointimal hyperplasia can often lead to impairment of blood flow, cardiac ischemia and the need for a repeat intervention in selected patients in high risk treatment groups. Yet repeat revascularization incurs risk of patient morbidity and mortality while adding significantly to the cost of health care. Given the widespread use of stents in interventional practice, there is a clear need for safe and effective inhibitors of neointimal hyperplasia.




Rapamycin is a macroyclic triene antibiotic produced by streptomyces hygroscopicus as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,929,992. It has been found that rapamycin inhibits the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo. Accordingly, rapamycin may be utilized in treating intimal smooth muscle cell hyperplasia, restenosis and vascular occlusion in a mammal, particularly following either biologically or mechanically mediated vascular injury, or under conditions that would predispose a mammal to suffering such a vascular injury. Rapamycin functions to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation and does not interfere with the re-endothelialization of the vessel walls.




Rapamycin functions to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation through a number of mechanisms. In addition, rapamycin reduces the other effects caused by vascular injury, for example, inflammation. The operation and various functions of rapamycin are described in detail below. Rapamycin as used throughout this application shall include rapamycin, rapamycin analogs, derivatives and congeners that bind FKBP12 and possess the same pharmacologic properties as rapamycin.




Rapamycin reduces vascular hyperplasia by antagonizing smooth muscle proliferation in response to mitogenic signals that are released during angioplasty. Inhibition of growth factor and cytokine mediated smooth muscle proliferation at the late G1 phase of the cell cycle is believed to be the dominant mechanism of action of rapamycin. However, rapamycin is also known to prevent T-cell proliferation and differentiation when administered systemically. This is the basis for its immunosuppresive activity and its ability to prevent graft rejection.




The molecular events that are responsible for the actions of rapamycin, a known anti-proliferative, which acts to reduce the magnitude and duration of neointimal hyperplasia, are still being elucidated. It is known, however, that rapamycin enters cells and binds to a high-affinity cytosolic protein called FKBP12. The complex of rapamycin and FKPB12 in turn binds to and inhibits a phosphoinositide (PI)-3 kinase called the “mammalian Target of Rapamycin” or TOR. TOR is a protein kinase that plays a key role in mediating the downstream signaling events associated with mitogenic growth factors and cytokines in smooth muscle cells and T lymphocytes. These events include phosphorylation of p27, phosphorylation of p70 s6 kinase and phosphorylation of 4BP-1, an important regulator of protein translation.




It is recognized that rapamycin reduces restenosis by inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia. However, there is evidence that rapamycin may also inhibit the other major component of restenosis, namely, negative remodeling. Remodeling is a process whose mechanism is not clearly understood but which results in shrinkage of the external elastic lamina and reduction in lumenal area over time, generally a period of approximately three to six months in humans.




Negative or constrictive vascular remodeling may be quantified angiographically as the percent diameter stenosis at the lesion site where there is no stent to obstruct the process. If late lumen loss is abolished in-lesion, it may be inferred that negative remodeling has been inhibited. Another method of determining the degree of remodeling involves measuring in-lesion external elastic lamina area using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Intravascular ultrasound is a technique that can image the external elastic lamina as well as the vascular lumen. Changes in the external elastic lamina proximal and distal to the stent from the post-procedural timepoint to four-month and twelve-month follow-ups are reflective of remodeling changes.




Evidence that rapamycin exerts an effect on remodeling comes from human implant studies with rapamycin coated stents showing a very low degree of restenosis in-lesion as well as in-stent. In-lesion parameters are usually measured approximately five millimeters on either side of the stent i.e. proximal and distal. Since the stent is not present to control remodeling in these zones which are still affected by balloon expansion, it may be inferred that rapamycin is preventing vascular remodeling.




The data in Table 1 below illustrate that in-lesion percent diameter stenosis remains low in the rapamycin treated groups, even at twelve months. Accordingly, these results support the hypothesis that rapamycin reduces remodeling.












TABLE 1.0











Angiographic In-Lesion Percent Diameter Stenosis






(%, mean ± SD and “n=” In Patients Who Received a






Rapamycin-Coated Stent














Coating




Post




4-6 month




12 month






Group




Placement




Follow Up




Follow Up









Brazil




10.6 ± 5.7 (30)




13.6 ± 8.6 (30)




22.3 ± 7.2 (15)






Netherlands




14.7 ± 8.8




22.4 ± 6.4



















Additional evidence supporting a reduction in negative remodeling with rapamycin comes from intravascular ultrasound data that was obtained from a first-in-man clinical program as illustrated in Table 2 below.












TABLE 2.0











Matched IVUS data in Patients Who Received a Rapamycin-Coated Stent
















4-Month




12-Month








Follow-Up




Follow-Up






IVUS Parameter




Post (n=)




(n=)




(n=)









Mean proximal vessel area




16.53 ± 3.53




16.31 ± 4.36




13.96 ± 2.26






(mm


2


)




(27)




(28)




(13)






Mean distal vessel area




13.12 ± 3.68




13.53 ± 4.17




12.49 ± 3.25






(mm


2


)




(26)




(26)




(14)














The data illustrated that there is minimal loss of vessel area proximally or distally which indicates that inhibition of negative remodeling has occurred in vessels treated with rapamycin-coated stents.




Other than the stent itself, there have been no effective solutions to the problem of vascular remodeling. Accordingly, rapamycin may represent a biological approach to controlling the vascular remodeling phenomenon.




It may be hypothesized that rapamycin acts to reduce negative remodeling in several ways. By specifically blocking the proliferation of fibroblasts in the vascular wall in response to injury, rapamycin may reduce the formation of vascular scar tissue. Rapamycin may also affect the translation of key proteins involved in collagen formation or metabolism.




Rapamycin used in this context includes rapamycin and all analogs, derivatives and congeners that bind FKBP12 and possess the same pharmacologic properties as rapamycin.




In a preferred embodiment, the rapamycin is delivered by a local delivery device to control negative remodeling of an arterial segment after balloon angioplasty as a means of reducing or preventing restenosis. While any delivery device may be utilized, it is preferred that the delivery device comprises a stent that includes a coating or sheath which elutes or releases rapamycin. The delivery system for such a device may comprise a local infusion catheter that delivers rapamycin at a rate controlled by the administrator.




Rapamycin may also be delivered systemically using an oral dosage form or a chronic injectible depot form or a patch to deliver rapamycin for a period ranging from about seven to forty-five days to achieve vascular tissue levels that are sufficient to inhibit negative remodeling. Such treatment is to be used to reduce or prevent restenosis when administered several days prior to elective angioplasty with or without a stent.




Data generated in porcine and rabbit models show that the release of rapamycin into the vascular wall from a nonerodible polymeric stent coating in a range of doses (35-430 ug/15-18 mm coronary stent) produces a peak fifty to fifty-five percent reduction in neointimal hyperplasia as set forth in Table 3 below. This reduction, which is maximal at about twenty-eight to thirty days, is typically not sustained in the range of ninety to one hundred eighty days in the porcine model as set forth in Table 4 below.












TABLE 3.0











Animal Studies with Rapamycin-coated stents.






Values are mean ± Standard Error of Mean















% Change







Neointimal Area




From


















Study




Duration




Stent


1






Rapamycin




N




(mm


2


)




Polyme




Metal














Porcine


















98009




14 days




Metal





 8




2.04 ± 0 17










1X + rapamycin




153 μg




 8




1.66 ± 0.17*




−42%




−19%








1X + TC300 + rapamycin




155 μg




 8




1.51 ± 0.19*




−47%




−26%






99005




28 days




Metal





10




2.29 ± 0.21










 9




3.91 ± 0.60**








1X + TC30 + rapamycin




130 μg




 8




2.81 ± 0.34





+23%








1X + TC100 + rapamycin




120 μg




 9




2.62 ± 0.21





+14%






99006




28 days




Metal





12




4.57 ± 0.46








EVA/BMA 3X





12




5.02 ± 0.62





+10%








1X + rapamycin




125 μg




11




2.84 ± 0.31* **




−43%




−38%








3X + rapamycin




430 μg




12




3.06 ± 0.17* **




−39%




−33%








3X + rapamycin




157 μg




12




2.77 ± 0.41* **




−45%




−39%






99011




28 days




Metal





11




3.09 ± 0.27










11




4.52 ± 0.37








1X + rapamycin




189 μg




14




3.05 ± 0.35





−1%








3X + rapamycin/dex




182/363 μg




14




2.72 ± 0.71





−12%






99021




60 days




Metal





12




2.14 ± 0.25








1X + rapamycin




181 μg




12




2.95 ± 0.38





+38%






99034




28 days




Metal





 8




5.24 ± 0.58








1X + rapamycin




186 μg




 8




2.47 ± 0.33**





−53%








3X + rapamycin/dex




185/369 μg




 6




2.42 ± 0.64**





−54%






20001




28 days




Metal





 6




1.81 ± 0.09








1X + rapamycin




172 μg




 5




1.66 ± 0.44





−8%






20007







30 days




Metal





 9




2.94 ± 0.43








1XTC + rapamycin




155 μg




10




1.40 ± 0.11*





−52%*











Rabbit


















99019




28 days




Metal





 8




1.20 ± 0.07










EVA/BMA 1X





10




1.26 ± 0.16





+5%








1X + rapamycin




 64 μg




 9




0.92 ± 0.14




−27%




−23%








1X + rapamycin




196 μg




10




0.66 ± 0.12* **




−48%




−45%






99020




28 days




Metal





12




1.18 ± 0.10








EVA/BMA 1X + rapamycin




197 μg




 8




0.81 ± 0.16





−32%













1


Stent nomenclature: EVA/BMA 1X, 2X, and 3X signifies approx. 500 μg, 1000 μg, and 1500 μg total mass (polymer + drug), respectively.










TC, top coat of 30 μg, 100 μg, or 300 μg drug-free BMA;










Biphasic; 2x 1X layers of rapamycin in EVA/BMA spearated by a 100 μg drug-free BMA layer.












2


0.25 mg/kg/d × 14 d preceeded by a loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg/d × 3d prior to stent implantation.










*p < 0 05 from EVA/BMA control.










**p < 0.05 from Metal;












#


Inflammation score: (0 = essentially no intimal involvement;










1 = <25% intima involved;










2 = ≧25% intima involved;










3 = >50% intima involved).





















TABLE 4.0











180 day Porcine Study with Rapamycin-coated stents.






Values are mean ± Standard Error of Mean















Neointimal Area




% Change From




Inflammation



















Study




Duration




Stent


1






Rapamycin




N




(mm


2


)




Polyme




Metal




Score #









20007




3 days




Metal





10




0.38 ± 0.06






1.05 ± 0.06


















(ETP-2-002233-P)




1XTC + rapamycin




155 μg




10




0.29 ± 0 03





−24%




1.08 ± 0.04




















30 days




Metal





 9




2.94 ± 0.43






0.11 ± 0.08








1XTC + rapamycin




155 μg




10




1.40 ± 0.11*





−52%*




0.25 ± 0.10







90 days




Metal





10




3.45 ± 0.34






0.20 ± 0.08








1XTC + rapamycin




155 μg




10




3.03 ± 0.29





−12%




0.80 ± 0.23








1X + rapamycin




171 μg




10




2.86 ± 0.35





−17%




0.60 ± 0.23







180 days




Metal





10




3.65 ± 0.39






0.65 ± 0.21








1XTC + rapamycin




155 μg




10




3.34 ± 0.31





−8%




1.50 ± 0.34








1X + rapamycin




171 μg




10




3.87 ± 0.28





+6%




1.68 ± 0.37














The release of rapamycin into the vascular wall of a human from a nonerodible polymeric stent coating provides superior results with respect to the magnitude and duration of the reduction in neointimal hyperplasia within the stent as compared to the vascular walls of animals as set forth above.




Humans implanted with a rapamycin coated stent comprising rapamycin in the same dose range as studied in animal models using the same polymeric matrix, as described above, reveal a much more profound reduction in neointimal hyperplasia than observed in animal models, based on the magnitude and duration of reduction in neointima. The human clinical response to rapamycin reveals essentially total abolition of neointimal hyperplasia inside the stent using both angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measurements. These results are sustained for at least one year as set forth in Table 5 below.












TABLE 5.0











Patients Treated (N = 45 patients) with a Rapamycin-coated Stent














Sirolimus FIM








(N = 45 Patients,




95%






Effectiveness Measures




45 Lesions)




Confidence Limit









Procedure Success (QCA)




100.0% (45/45)




[92.1%, 100.0%]






4-month In-Stent






Diameter Stenosis (%)






Mean ± SD (N)




4.8% ± 6.1% (30)




[2.6%, 7.0%]






Range (min, max)




(−8.2%, 14.9%)






6-month In-Stent






Diameter Stenosis (%)






Mean ± SD (N)




8.9% ± 7.6% (13)




[4.8%, 13.0%]






Range (min, max)




(−2.9%, 20.4%)






12-month In-Stent






Diameter Stenosis (%)






Mean ± SD (N)




8.9% ± 6.1% (15)




[5.8%, 12.0%]






Range (min, max)




(−3.0%, 22.0%)






4-month In-Stent






Late Loss (mm)






Mean ± SD (N)




0.00 ± 0.29 (30)




[−0.10, 0.10]






Range (min, max)




(−0.51, 0.45)






6-month In-Stent






Late Loss (mm)






Mean ± SD (N)




0.25 ± 0.27 (13)




[0.10, 0.39]






Range (min, max)




(−0.51, 0.91)






12-month In-Stent






Late Loss (mm)






Mean ± SD (N)




0.11 ± 0.36 (15)




[−0.08, 0.29]






Range (min, max)




(−0.51, 0.82)






4-month Obstruction






Volume (%) (IVUS)






Mean ± SD (N)




10.48% ± 2.78% (28)




[9.45%, 11.51%]






Range (min, max)




(4.60%, 16.35%)






6-month Obstruction






Volume (%) (IVUS)






Mean ± SD (N)




7.22% ± 4.60% (13)




[4.72%, 9.72%],






Range (min, max)




(3.82%, 19.88%)






12-month Obstruction






Volume (%) (IVUS)






Mean ± SD (N)




2.11% ± 5.28% (15)




[0.00%, 4.78%],






Range (min, max)




(0.00%, 19.89%)






6-month Target Lesion




0.0% (0/30)




[0.0%, 9.5%]






Revascularization (TLR)






12-month Target




0.0% (0/15)




[0.0%, 18.1%]






Lesion Revascularization






(TLR)











QCA = Quantitative Coronary Angiography










SD = Standard Deviation










IVUS = Intravascular Ultrasound













Rapamycin produces an unexpected benefit in humans when delivered from a stent by causing a profound reduction in in-stent neointimal hyperplasia that is sustained for at least one year. The magnitude and duration of this benefit in humans is not predicted from animal model data. Rapamycin used in this context includes rapamycin and all analogs, derivatives and congeners that bind FKBP12 and possess the same pharmacologic properties as rapamycin.




These results may be due to a number of factors. For example, the greater effectiveness of rapamycin in humans is due to greater sensitivity of its mechanism(s) of action toward the pathophysiology of human vascular lesions compared to the pathophysiology of animal models of angioplasty. In addition, the combination of the dose applied to the stent and the polymer coating that controls the release of the drug is important in the effectiveness of the drug.




As stated above, rapamycin reduces vascular hyperplasia by antagonizing smooth muscle proliferation in response to mitogenic signals that are released during angioplasty injury. Also, it is known that rapamycin prevents T-cell proliferation and differentiation when administered systemically. It has also been determined that rapamycin exerts a local inflammatory effect in the vessel wall when administered from a stent in low doses for a sustained period of time (approximately two to six weeks). The local anti-inflammatory benefit is profound and unexpected. In combination with the smooth muscle anti-proliferative effect, this dual mode of action of rapamycin may be responsible for its exceptional efficacy.




Accordingly, rapamycin delivered from a local device platform, reduces neointimal hyperplasia by a combination of anti-inflammatory and smooth muscle anti-proliferative effects. Rapamycin used in this context means rapamycin and all analogs, derivatives and congeners that bind FKBP12 and possess the same pharmacologic properties as rapamycin. Local device platforms include stent coatings, stent sheaths, grafts and local drug infusion catheters or porous balloons or any other suitable means for the in situ or local delivery of drugs, agents or compounds.




The anti-inflammatory effect of rapamycin is evident in data from an experiment, illustrated in Table 6, in which rapamycin delivered from a stent was compared with dexamethasone delivered from a stent. Dexamethasone, a potent steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, was used as a reference standard. Although dexamethasone is able to reduce inflammation scores, rapamycin is far more effective than dexamethasone in reducing inflammation scores. In addition, rapamycin significantly reduces neointimal hyperplasia, unlike dexamethasone.
















TABLE 6.0









Group










Rapamycin





Neointimal Area




% Area




Inflammation






Rap




N=




(mm


2


)




Stenosis




Score











Uncoated




8




5.24 ± 1.65




54 ± 19




0.97 ± 1.00






Dexamethasone




8




4.31 ± 3.02




45 ± 31




0.39 ± 0.24






(Dex)






Rapamycin




7




2.47 ± 0.94*




26 ± 10*




0.13 ± 0.19*






Rap + Dex




6




2.42 ± 1.58*




26 ± 18*




0.17 ± 0.30*











*significance level P < 0.05













Rapamycin has also been found to reduce cytokine levels in vascular tissue when delivered from a stent. The data in

FIG. 1

illustrates that rapamycin is highly effective in reducing monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP-1) levels in the vascular wall. MCP-1 is an example of a proinflammatory/chemotactic cytokine that is elaborated during vessel injury. Reduction in MCP-1 illustrates the beneficial effect of rapamycin in reducing the expression of proinflammatory mediators and contributing to the anti-inflammatory effect of rapamycin delivered locally from a stent. It is recognized that vascular inflammation in response to injury is a major contributor to the development of neointimal hyperplasia.




Since rapamycin may be shown to inhibit local inflammatory events in the vessel it is believed that this could explain the unexpected superiority of rapamycin in inhibiting neointima.




As set forth above, rapamycin functions on a number of levels to produce such desired effects as the prevention of T-cell proliferation, the inhibition of negative remodeling, the reduction of inflammation, and the prevention of smooth muscle cell proliferation. While the exact mechanisms of these functions are not completely known, the mechanisms that have been identified may be expanded upon.




Studies with rapamycin suggest that the prevention of smooth muscle cell proliferation by blockade of the cell cycle is a valid strategy for reducing neointimal hyperplasia. Dramatic and sustained reductions in late lumen loss and neointimal plaque volume have been observed in patients receiving rapamycin delivered locally from a stent. The present invention expands upon the mechanism of rapamycin to include additional approaches to inhibit the cell cycle and reduce neointimal hyperplasia without producing toxicity.




The cell cycle is a tightly controlled biochemical cascade of events that regulate the process of cell replication. When cells are stimulated by appropriate growth factors, they move from G


0


(quiescence) to the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Selective inhibition of the cell cycle in the G1 phase, prior to DNA replication (S phase), may offer therapeutic advantages of cell preservation and viability while retaining anti-proliferative efficacy when compared to therapeutics that act later in the cell cycle i.e. at S, G2 or M phase.




Accordingly, the prevention of intimal hyperplasia in blood vessels and other conduit vessels in the body may be achieved using cell cycle inhibitors that act selectively at the G1 phase of the cell cycle. These inhibitors of the G1 phase of the cell cycle may be small molecules, peptides, proteins, oligonucleotides or DNA sequences. More specifically, these drugs or agents include inhibitors of cyclin dependent kinases (cdk's) involved with the progression of the cell cycle through the G1 phase, in particular cdk2 and cdk4.




Examples of drugs, agents or compounds that act selectively at the G1 phase of the cell cycle include small molecules such as flavopiridol and its structural analogs that have been found to inhibit cell cycle in the late G1 phase by antagonism of cyclin dependent kinases. Therapeutic agents that elevate an endogenous kinase inhibitory protein


kip


called P27, sometimes referred to as P27


kip1


, that selectively inhibits cyclin dependent kinases may be utilized. This includes small molecules, peptides and proteins that either block the degradation of P27 or enhance the cellular production of P27, including gene vectors that can transfact the gene to produce P27. Staurosporin and related small molecules that block the cell cycle by inhibiting protein kinases may be utilized. Protein kinase inhibitors, including the class of tyrphostins that selectively inhibit protein kinases to antagonize signal transduction in smooth muscle in response to a broad range of growth factors such as PDGF and FGF may also be utilized.




Any of the drugs, agents or compounds discussed above may be administered either systemically, for example, orally, intravenously, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, nasally or intradermally, or locally, for example, stent coating, stent covering or local delivery catheter. In addition, the drugs or agents discussed above may be formulated for fast-release or slow release with the objective of maintaining the drugs or agents in contact with target tissues for a period ranging from three days to eight weeks.




As set forth above, the complex of rapamycin and FKPB12 binds to and inhibits a phosphoinositide (PI)-3 kinase called the mammalian Target of Rapamycin or TOR. An antagonist of the catalytic activity of TOR, functioning as either an active site inhibitor or as an allosteric modulator, i.e. an indirect inhibitor that allosterically modulates, would mimic the actions of rapamycin but bypass the requirement for FKBP12. The potential advantages of a direct inhibitor of TOR include better tissue penetration and better physical/chemical stability. In addition, other potential advantages include greater selectivity and specificity of action due to the specificity of an antagonist for one of multiple isoforms of TOR that may exist in different tissues, and a potentially different spectrum of downstream effects leading to greater drug efficacy and/or safety.




The inhibitor may be a small organic molecule (approximate mw<1000), which is either a synthetic or naturally derived product. Wortmanin may be an agent which inhibits the function of this class of proteins. It may also be a peptide or an oligonucleotide sequence. The inhibitor may be administered either sytemically (orally, intravenously, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, nasally, or intradermally) or locally (stent coating, stent covering, local drug delivery catheter). For example, the inhibitor may be released into the vascular wall of a human from a nonerodible polymeric stent coating. In addition, the inhibitor may be formulated for fast-release or slow release with the objective of maintaining the rapamycin or other drug, agent or compound in contact with target tissues for a period ranging from three days to eight weeks.




As stated previously, the implantation of a coronary stent in conjunction with balloon angioplasty is highly effective in treating acute vessel closure and may reduce the risk of restenosis. Intravascular ultrasound studies (Mintz et al., 1996) suggest that coronary stenting effectively prevents vessel constriction and that most of the late luminal loss after stent implantation is due to plaque growth, probably related to neointimal hyperplasia. The late luminal loss after coronary stenting is almost two times higher than that observed after conventional balloon angioplasty. Thus, inasmuch as stents prevent at least a portion of the restenosis process, the use of drugs, agents or compounds which prevent inflammation and proliferation, or prevent proliferation by multiple mechanisms, combined with a stent may provide the most efficacious treatment for post-angioplasty restenosis.




The local delivery of drugs, agents or compounds from a stent has the following advantages; namely, the prevention of vessel recoil and remodeling through the scaffolding action of the stent and the drugs, agents or compounds and the prevention of multiple components of neointimal hyperplasia. This local administration of drugs, agents or compounds to stented coronary arteries may also have additional therapeutic benefit. For example, higher tissue concentrations would be achievable than that which would occur with systemic administration, reduced systemic toxicity, and single treatment and ease of administration. An additional benefit of drug therapy may be to reduce the dose of the therapeutic compounds, thereby limiting their toxicity, while still achieving a reduction in restenosis.




There are a multiplicity of different stents that may be utilized following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Although any number of stents may be utilized in accordance with the present invention, for simplicity, one particular stent will be described in exemplary embodiments of the present invention. The skilled artisan will recognize that any number of stents may be utilized in connection with the present invention.




A stent is commonly used as a tubular structure left inside the lumen of a duct to relieve an obstruction. Commonly, stents are inserted into the lumen in a non-expanded form and are then expanded autonomously, or with the aid of a second device in situ. A typical method of expansion occurs through the use of a catheter-mounted angioplasty balloon which is inflated within the stenosed vessel or body passageway in order to shear and disrupt the obstructions associated with the wall components of the vessel and to obtain an enlarged lumen. As set forth below, self-expanding stents may also be utilized.





FIG. 2

illustrates an exemplary stent


100


which may be utilized in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The expandable cylindrical stent


100


comprises a fenestrated structure for placement in a blood vessel, duct or lumen to hold the vessel, duct or lumen open, more particularly for protecting a segment of artery from restenosis after angioplasty. The stent


100


may be expanded circumferentially and maintained in an expanded configuration, that is circumferentially or radially rigid. The stent


100


is axially flexible and when flexed at a band, the stent


100


avoids any externally-protruding component parts.




The stent


100


generally comprises first and second ends with an intermediate section therebetween. The stent


100


has a longitudinal axis and comprises a plurality of longitudinally disposed bands


102


, wherein each band


102


defines a generally continuous wave along a line segment parallel to the longitudinal axis. A plurality of circumferentially arranged links


104


maintain the bands


102


in a substantially tubular structure. Essentially, each longitudinally disposed band


102


is connected at a plurality of periodic locations, by a short circumferentially arranged link


104


to an adjacent band


102


. The wave associated with each of the bands


102


has approximately the same fundamental spatial frequency in the intermediate section, and the bands


102


are so disposed that the wave associated with them are generally aligned so as to be generally in phase with one another. As illustrated in the figure, each longitudinally arranged band


102


undulates through approximately two cycles before there is a link to an adjacent band.




The stent


100


may be fabricated utilizing any number of methods. For example, the stent


100


may be fabricated from a hollow or formed stainless steel tube that may be machined using lasers, electric discharge milling, chemical etching or other means. The stent


100


is inserted into the body and placed at the desired site in an unexpanded form. In one embodiment, expansion may be effected in a blood vessel by a balloon catheter, where the final diameter of the stent


100


is a function of the diameter of the balloon catheter used.




It should be appreciated that a stent


100


in accordance with the present invention may be embodied in a shape-memory material, including, for example, an appropriate alloy of nickel and titanium. In this embodiment, after the stent


100


has been formed it may be compressed so as to occupy a space sufficiently small as to permit its insertion in a blood vessel or other tissue by insertion means, wherein the insertion means include a suitable catheter, or flexible rod. On emerging from the catheter, the stent


100


may be configured to expand into the desired configuration where the expansion is automatic or triggered by a change in pressure, temperature or electrical stimulation.





FIG. 3

illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the present invention utilizing the stent


100


illustrated in FIG.


2


. As illustrated, the stent


100


may be modified to comprise a reservoir


106


. Each of the reservoirs may be opened or closed as desired. These reservoirs


106


may be specifically designed to hold the drug, agent, compound or combinations thereof to be delivered. Regardless of the design of the stent


100


, it is preferable to have the drug, agent, compound or combinations thereof dosage applied with enough specificity and a sufficient concentration to provide an effective dosage in the lesion area. In this regard, the reservoir size in the bands


102


is preferably sized to adequately apply the drug/drug combination dosage at the desired location and in the desired amount.




In an alternate exemplary embodiment, the entire inner and outer surface of the stent


100


may be coated with various drug and drug combinations in therapeutic dosage amounts. A detailed description of exemplary coating techniques is described below.




Rapamycin or any of the drugs, agents or compounds described above may be incorporated into or affixed to the stent in a number of ways and utilizing any number of biocompatible materials. In the exemplary embodiment, the rapamycin is directly incorporated into a polymeric matrix and sprayed onto the outer surface of the stent. The rapamycin elutes from the polymeric matrix over time and enters the surrounding tissue. The rapamycin preferably remains on the stent for at least three days up to approximately six months and more preferably between seven and thirty days.




Any number of non-erodible polymers may be utilized in conjunction with rapamycin. In the exemplary embodiment, the polymeric matrix comprises two layers. The base layer comprises a solution of ethylene-co-vinylacetate and polybutylmethacrylate. The rapamycin is incorporated into this layer. The outer layer comprises only polybutylmethacrylate and acts as a diffusion barrier to prevent the rapamycin from eluting too quickly and entering the surrounding tissues. The thickness of the outer layer or top coat determines the rate at which the rapamycin elutes from the matrix. Essentially, the rapamycin elutes from the matrix by diffusion through the polymer molecules. Polymers are permeable, thereby allowing solids, liquids and gases to escape therefrom. The total thickness of the polymeric matrix is in the range from about 1 micron to about 20 microns or greater.




The ethylene-co-vinylacetate, polybutylmethacrylate and rapamycin solution may be incorporated into or onto the stent in a number of ways. For example, the solution may be sprayed onto the stent or the stent may be dipped into the solution. In a preferred embodiment, the solution is sprayed onto the stent and then allowed to dry. In another exemplary embodiment, the solution may be electrically charged to one polarity and the stent electrically changed to the opposite polarity. In this manner, the solution and stent will be attracted to one another. In using this type of spraying process, waste may be reduced and more control over the thickness of the coat may be achieved.




Since rapamycin works by entering the surrounding tissue, it is preferably only affixed to the surface of the stent making contact with one tissue. Typically, only the outer surface of the stent makes contact with the tissue. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, only the outer surface of the stent is coated with rapamycin. For other drugs, agents or compounds, the entire stent may be coated.




It is important to note that different polymers may be utilized for different stents. For example, in the above-described embodiment, ethylene-co-vinylacetate and polybutylmethacrylate are utilized to form the polymeric matrix. This matrix works well with stainless steel stents. Other polymers may be utilized more effectively with stents formed from other materials, including materials that exhibit superelastic properties such as alloys of nickel and titanium.




Although shown and described is what is believed to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is apparent that departures from specific designs and methods described and shown will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art and may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The present invention is not restricted to the particular constructions described and illustrated, but should be constructed to cohere with all modifications that may fall within the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for the treatment of intimal hyperplasia in vessel walls comprising the controlled delivery, by release, for a sustained period of time in the range from about two to about six weeks, from an implantable intraluminal medical device, of an anti-inflammatory agent in therapeutic dosage amounts, the anti-inflammatory agent comprises analogs and congeners that bind a high affinity cytosolic protein, FKBP 12 and possesses the same pharmacologic properties as rapamycin.
  • 2. Method for the treatment of intimal hyperplasia in vessel walls according to claim 1, wherein the anti-inflammatory agent reduces inflammatory cytokine levels in vascular tissues.
  • 3. The method for the treatment of intimal hyperplasia in vessel walls according to claim 1, wherein the anti-inflammatory agent reduces monocyte chemotactic protein levels in vascular tissues.
  • 4. The method for treatment of intimal hyperplasia in vessel walls according to claim 1, wherein the anti-inflammatory agent comprises rapamycin.
  • 5. A drug delivery device comprising:an implantable intraluminal medical device; and a therapeutic dosage of an agent releasably affixed to the implantable intraluminal medical device for the treatment of inflammation caused by injury, the agent being released for a sustained period of time in the range from about two to about six weeks, the anti-inflammatory agent comprises analogs and congeners that bind a high affinity cytosolic protein, FKBP 12 and posses the same pharmacologic properties as rapamycin.
  • 6. The drug delivery device according to claim 5, wherein the agent reduces inflammatory cytokine levels in vascular tissue.
  • 7. The drug delivery device according to claim 5, wherein the agent reduces monocyte chemotactic protein levels in vascular tissues.
  • 8. The drug delivery device according to claim 5, wherein the agent comprises rapamycin.
  • 9. The drug delivery device according to claim 5, wherein the intraluminal medical device comprises a stent.
  • 10. The drug delivery device according to claim 9, wherein the agent is incorporated in a non-erodible polymeric matrix coating affixed to the stent.
  • 11. A method for the treatment of inflammation in vessel walls comprising the controlled delivery, by release, for a sustained period of time in the range from about two to about six weeks, from an implantable intraluminal medical device of an anti-inflammatory agent in therapeutic dosage amounts, the anti-inflammatory agent comprises analogs and congeners that bind a high affinity cytosolic protein, FKBP 12 and posses the same pharmacologic properties as rapamycin.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/575,480, filed on May 19, 2000 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/204,417, filed May 12, 2000 and claims the benefit of, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/262,614, filed Jan. 18, 2001, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/262,461, filed Jan. 18, 2001, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/263,806, filed Jan. 24, 2001 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/263,979, filed Jan. 25, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (292)
Number Name Date Kind
3657744 Ersek Apr 1972 A
3932627 Margraf Jan 1976 A
4292965 Nash et al. Oct 1981 A
4441216 Ionescu et al. Apr 1984 A
4503569 Dotter Mar 1985 A
4553545 Maass et al. Nov 1985 A
4580568 Gianturco Apr 1986 A
4613665 Larm Sep 1986 A
4655771 Wallsten Apr 1987 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4739762 Palmaz Apr 1988 A
4776337 Palmaz Oct 1988 A
4800882 Gianturco Jan 1989 A
4856516 Hillstead Aug 1989 A
4872867 Joh Oct 1989 A
4886062 Wiktor Dec 1989 A
4907336 Gianturco Mar 1990 A
4916193 Tang et al. Apr 1990 A
4954126 Wallsten Sep 1990 A
4969458 Wiktor Nov 1990 A
4990131 Dardik Feb 1991 A
4990155 Wilkoff Feb 1991 A
4994071 MacGregor Feb 1991 A
5015253 MacGregor May 1991 A
5035706 Gianturco Jul 1991 A
5041100 Rowland et al. Aug 1991 A
5041126 Gianturco Aug 1991 A
5049132 Shaffer et al. Sep 1991 A
5053048 Pinchuk Oct 1991 A
5061275 Wallsten et al. Oct 1991 A
5061750 Feijen et al. Oct 1991 A
5064435 Porter Nov 1991 A
5092877 Pinchuk Mar 1992 A
5102417 Palmaz Apr 1992 A
5104404 Wolff Apr 1992 A
5116365 Hillstead May 1992 A
5122154 Rhodes Jun 1992 A
5131908 Dardik et al. Jul 1992 A
5133732 Wiktor Jul 1992 A
5134192 Feijen et al. Jul 1992 A
5135536 Hillstead Aug 1992 A
5163952 Froix Nov 1992 A
5163958 Pinchuk Nov 1992 A
5171262 MacGregor Dec 1992 A
5176660 Truckai Jan 1993 A
5178618 Kandarpa Jan 1993 A
5180366 Woods Jan 1993 A
5182317 Winters et al. Jan 1993 A
5185408 Tang et al. Feb 1993 A
5192307 Wall Mar 1993 A
5195984 Schatz Mar 1993 A
5213576 Abiuso et al. May 1993 A
5217483 Tower Jun 1993 A
5222971 Willard et al. Jun 1993 A
5226913 Pinchuk Jul 1993 A
5234456 Silvestrini Aug 1993 A
5246445 Yachia et al. Sep 1993 A
5258020 Froix Nov 1993 A
5258021 Duran Nov 1993 A
5262451 Winters et al. Nov 1993 A
5266073 Wall Nov 1993 A
5275622 Lazarus et al. Jan 1994 A
5282823 Schwartz et al. Feb 1994 A
5282824 Gianturco Feb 1994 A
5283257 Gregory et al. Feb 1994 A
5288711 Mitchell et al. Feb 1994 A
5290305 Inoue Mar 1994 A
5292331 Boneau Mar 1994 A
5292802 Rhee et al. Mar 1994 A
5304121 Sahatjian Apr 1994 A
5304200 Spaulding Apr 1994 A
5306250 March et al. Apr 1994 A
5308862 Ohlstein May 1994 A
5308889 Rhee et al. May 1994 A
5314444 Gianturco May 1994 A
5314472 Fontaine May 1994 A
5328471 Slepian Jul 1994 A
5334301 Heinke et al. Aug 1994 A
5336518 Narayanan et al. Aug 1994 A
5338770 Winters et al. Aug 1994 A
5342348 Kaplan Aug 1994 A
5342387 Summers Aug 1994 A
5342621 Eury Aug 1994 A
5354257 Roubin et al. Oct 1994 A
5354308 Simon et al. Oct 1994 A
5356433 Rowland et al. Oct 1994 A
5366504 Andersen et al. Nov 1994 A
5368566 Crocker Nov 1994 A
5370683 Fontaine Dec 1994 A
5370691 Samson Dec 1994 A
5375612 Cottenceau et al. Dec 1994 A
5376112 Duran Dec 1994 A
5380299 Fearnot et al. Jan 1995 A
5382261 Palmaz Jan 1995 A
5383928 Scott et al. Jan 1995 A
5387235 Chuter Feb 1995 A
5389106 Tower Feb 1995 A
5393772 Yue et al. Feb 1995 A
5395390 Simon et al. Mar 1995 A
5397355 Marin et al. Mar 1995 A
5403341 Solar Apr 1995 A
5405377 Cragg Apr 1995 A
5409696 Narayanan et al. Apr 1995 A
5411549 Peters May 1995 A
5415619 Lee et al. May 1995 A
5419760 Narciso, Jr. May 1995 A
D359802 Fontaine Jun 1995 S
5421955 Lau Jun 1995 A
5423885 Williams Jun 1995 A
5429618 Keogh Jul 1995 A
5429634 Narciso Jul 1995 A
5439446 Barry Aug 1995 A
5441515 Khosravi et al. Aug 1995 A
5441516 Wang et al. Aug 1995 A
5441947 Dodge et al. Aug 1995 A
5443458 Eury Aug 1995 A
5443477 Marin et al. Aug 1995 A
5443496 Schwartz et al. Aug 1995 A
5443498 Fontaine Aug 1995 A
5443500 Sigwart Aug 1995 A
5447724 Helmus et al. Sep 1995 A
5449372 Schmaltz et al. Sep 1995 A
5449373 Pinchasik et al. Sep 1995 A
5449382 Dayton Sep 1995 A
5464450 Buscemi et al. Nov 1995 A
5464650 Berg et al. Nov 1995 A
5486357 Narayanan Jan 1996 A
5496365 Sgro Mar 1996 A
5500013 Buscemi et al. Mar 1996 A
5510077 Dinh et al. Apr 1996 A
5516781 Morris et al. May 1996 A
5519042 Morris et al. May 1996 A
5523092 Hanson et al. Jun 1996 A
5527354 Fontaine et al. Jun 1996 A
5545208 Wolff et al. Aug 1996 A
5551954 Buscemi et al. Sep 1996 A
5554182 Dinh et al. Sep 1996 A
5554954 Takahashi Sep 1996 A
5556413 Lam Sep 1996 A
5562922 Lambert Oct 1996 A
5563146 Morris et al. Oct 1996 A
5569197 Helmus et al. Oct 1996 A
5569295 Lam Oct 1996 A
5569462 Martinson et al. Oct 1996 A
5571166 Dinh et al. Nov 1996 A
5574059 Regunathan et al. Nov 1996 A
5578075 Dayton Nov 1996 A
5580873 Bianco et al. Dec 1996 A
5580874 Bianco et al. Dec 1996 A
5591140 Narayanan et al. Jan 1997 A
5591197 Orth et al. Jan 1997 A
5591224 Schwartz et al. Jan 1997 A
5591227 Dinh et al. Jan 1997 A
5599352 Dinh et al. Feb 1997 A
5603722 Phan et al. Feb 1997 A
5605696 Eury et al. Feb 1997 A
5607463 Schwartz et al. Mar 1997 A
5607475 Cahalan et al. Mar 1997 A
5609629 Fearnot et al. Mar 1997 A
5620984 Bianco et al. Apr 1997 A
5621102 Bianco et al. Apr 1997 A
5622975 Singh et al. Apr 1997 A
5624411 Tuch Apr 1997 A
5628785 Schwartz et al. May 1997 A
5629077 Turnlund et al. May 1997 A
5629315 Bianco et al. May 1997 A
5632763 Glastra May 1997 A
5632840 Campbell May 1997 A
5637113 Tartaglia et al. Jun 1997 A
5643312 Fischell et al. Jul 1997 A
5643939 Ohlstein Jul 1997 A
5646160 Morris et al. Jul 1997 A
5648357 Bianco et al. Jul 1997 A
5649952 Lam Jul 1997 A
5649977 Campbell Jul 1997 A
5651174 Schwartz et al. Jul 1997 A
5652243 Bianco et al. Jul 1997 A
5653992 Bezwada et al. Aug 1997 A
5662609 Slepian Sep 1997 A
5665728 Morris et al. Sep 1997 A
5669924 Shaknovich Sep 1997 A
5670506 Leigh et al. Sep 1997 A
5672638 Verhoeven et al. Sep 1997 A
5674242 Phan et al. Oct 1997 A
5679400 Tuch Oct 1997 A
5679659 Verhoeven et al. Oct 1997 A
5693085 Buirge et al. Dec 1997 A
5697967 Dinh et al. Dec 1997 A
5697971 Fischell et al. Dec 1997 A
5700286 Tartaglia et al. Dec 1997 A
5707385 Williams Jan 1998 A
5709874 Hanson et al. Jan 1998 A
5725549 Lam Mar 1998 A
5725567 Wolff et al. Mar 1998 A
5728150 McDonald et al. Mar 1998 A
5728420 Keogh Mar 1998 A
5731326 Hart et al. Mar 1998 A
5733327 Igaki et al. Mar 1998 A
5733920 Mansuri et al. Mar 1998 A
5733925 Kunz et al. Mar 1998 A
5735897 Buirge Apr 1998 A
5739138 Bianco et al. Apr 1998 A
5755734 Richter et al. May 1998 A
5755772 Evans et al. May 1998 A
5769883 Buscemi et al. Jun 1998 A
5776184 Tuch Jul 1998 A
5780476 Underiner et al. Jul 1998 A
5782908 Cahalan et al. Jul 1998 A
5788979 Alt et al. Aug 1998 A
5792772 Bianco et al. Aug 1998 A
5798372 Davies et al. Aug 1998 A
5799384 Schwartz et al. Sep 1998 A
5800507 Schwartz Sep 1998 A
5800508 Goicoechea et al. Sep 1998 A
5807861 Klein et al. Sep 1998 A
5811447 Kunz et al. Sep 1998 A
5820917 Tuch Oct 1998 A
5820918 Ronan et al. Oct 1998 A
5824048 Tuch Oct 1998 A
5824049 Ragheb et al. Oct 1998 A
5833651 Donovan et al. Nov 1998 A
5837008 Berg et al. Nov 1998 A
5837313 Ding et al. Nov 1998 A
5843172 Yan Dec 1998 A
5849034 Schwartz Dec 1998 A
5851217 Wolff et al. Dec 1998 A
5851231 Wolff et al. Dec 1998 A
5858990 Walsh Jan 1999 A
5861027 Trapp Jan 1999 A
5865814 Tuch Feb 1999 A
5871535 Wolff et al. Feb 1999 A
5873904 Ragheb et al. Feb 1999 A
5876433 Lunn Mar 1999 A
5879697 Ding et al. Mar 1999 A
5882335 Leone et al. Mar 1999 A
5891108 Leone et al. Apr 1999 A
5900246 Lambert May 1999 A
5902266 Leone et al. May 1999 A
5912253 Cottens et al. Jun 1999 A
5932580 Levitzki et al. Aug 1999 A
5951586 Berg et al. Sep 1999 A
5957971 Schwartz Sep 1999 A
5972027 Johnson Oct 1999 A
5976534 Hart et al. Nov 1999 A
5977163 Li et al. Nov 1999 A
5980553 Gray et al. Nov 1999 A
5980566 Alt et al. Nov 1999 A
5980972 Ding Nov 1999 A
5981568 Kunz et al. Nov 1999 A
5985307 Hanson et al. Nov 1999 A
5997468 Wolff et al. Dec 1999 A
6004346 Wolff et al. Dec 1999 A
6039721 Johnson et al. Mar 2000 A
6059813 Vrba et al. May 2000 A
6071305 Brown et al. Jun 2000 A
6074659 Kunz et al. Jun 2000 A
6080190 Schwartz Jun 2000 A
6096070 Ragheb et al. Aug 2000 A
6120536 Dinge et al. Sep 2000 A
6136798 Cody et al. Oct 2000 A
6140127 Sprague Oct 2000 A
6146358 Rowe Nov 2000 A
6153252 Hossainy et al. Nov 2000 A
6171232 Papandreou et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171609 Kunz Jan 2001 B1
6177272 Nabel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6214901 Chudzik et al. Apr 2001 B1
6240616 Yan Jun 2001 B1
6254632 Wu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258121 Yang et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268390 Kunz Jul 2001 B1
6273913 Wright et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287320 Slepian Sep 2001 B1
6287628 Hossainy et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306421 Kunz et al. Oct 2001 B1
6313264 Caggiano et al. Nov 2001 B1
6369039 Palasis et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379382 Yang Apr 2002 B1
6517858 Le Moal et al. Feb 2003 B1
6585764 Wright et al. Jul 2003 B2
20010007083 Roorda Jul 2001 A1
20020010418 Lary et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020061326 Li et al. May 2002 A1
20020082680 Shanley Jun 2002 A1
20020082685 Sirhan et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095114 Palasis Jul 2002 A1
20020103505 Thompson Aug 2002 A1
20020103526 Steinke Aug 2002 A1
20020119178 Levesque et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020127327 Schwarz et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133224 Bajgar et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020193475 Hossainy et al. Dec 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
3205942 Sep 1983 DE
540290 Oct 1992 EP
568 310 Nov 1993 EP
604 022 Jun 1994 EP
621 015 Oct 1994 EP
623 354 Nov 1994 EP
734698 Mar 1996 EP
0 712 615 May 1996 EP
716 836 Jun 1996 EP
0 716 836 Jun 1996 EP
800801 Aug 1996 EP
734 721 Oct 1996 EP
0 761 251 Mar 1997 EP
830853 Jul 1997 EP
0 850 651 Jul 1998 EP
0 938 878 Sep 1999 EP
0 938 878 Sep 1999 EP
950 386 Oct 1999 EP
0 566 807 Apr 1992 FR
0 662 307 Dec 1951 GB
1 205 743 Sep 1970 GB
WO 912779 Sep 1991 WO
WO 9215286 Sep 1992 WO
WO 9401056 Jan 1994 WO
WO 9421308 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9421309 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9424961 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9600272 Jan 1996 WO
WO 9626689 Sep 1996 WO
WO 9632907 Oct 1996 WO
WO 9634580 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9725000 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9733534 Sep 1997 WO
WO 9813344 Apr 1998 WO
WO 9819628 May 1998 WO
WO 9823228 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9823244 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9834669 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9836784 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9847447 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9856312 Dec 1998 WO
WO 0021584 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0027445 May 2000 WO
WO 0032255 Jun 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Ruef, Johannes Md, et al.; “Flavopiridol Inhibits Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation In Vitro and Neointimal Formation In Vivo After Carotid Injury In the Rat”; From the Division of Cardiology and Sealy Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston; Accepted Apr. 9, 1999; Circulation Aug. 10, 1999; pp 659-665.
Provisional Applications (5)
Number Date Country
60/263979 Jan 2001 US
60/263806 Jan 2001 US
60/262614 Jan 2001 US
60/262461 Jan 2001 US
60/204417 May 2000 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/575480 May 2000 US
Child 09/850232 US