Patent Application
20210330861
The disclosed subject-matter relates to an antimicrobial coating composition for coating articles comprising an antimicrobial peptide; a nanoparticle bound to said antimicrobial peptide; wherein the composition is suitable to be bonded to the surface of the article.
The said composition could be used as coating composition of medical devices and laboratory surfaces.
Metal nanoparticles have been extensively investigated for biosensor, drug delivery, antimicrobial materials and other biomedical applications due to their distinct surface plasmon resonance (SPR) properties, stability, biocompatibility, ease of synthesis and surface functionalization1. There are several reports available in literature about the preparation of antimicrobial metal nanoparticles with broad antimicrobial spectrum2,3. These methods either involve multiple steps including synthesis of nanoparticles, surface functionalization and capping of antimicrobial materials or one pot method to synthesize nanoparticles with antimicrobial properties3. However, there is possibility that bacteria can adopt resistance against these nanomaterials due to their widespread and indiscriminate exposure over time, instigating worldwide public health concerns. Numerous studies have documented about the resistance to nanosilver and nanoalumina to different strains of bacteria through multiple mechanisms4. In fact, this resistance can also impact the resistance of bacteria against other kinds of antimicrobial agents4. Additionally, toxicity of these nanoparticles to human cells depends on size, shape, functionality and dosage and no metabolic and immunological responses induced by these particles are studied in details5.
There is urgent need to develop antimicrobial nanomaterials with properties of not triggering resistance to bacteria and toxicity to human cells. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), described later, are a promising class of molecules to meet these criteria due to their mode of action and they represent new generation of antibiotics. Recently, self-assembled AMP nanoparticles, AMPs loaded on carbohydrate nanoparticles and AMP in combination with silver nanoparticles have been used as potent antimicrobial agents6. The antimicrobial activity of AMPs may be impaired by proteolytic degradation and therefore various analogues of AMPs with varying chain lengths have been synthesized to prevent the degradation7. On the other hand, the capping of peptides on the nanoparticle surface is alternative approach to prevent them from proteolytic degradation41,8. Peptides with different biological properties have been used to conjugate the gold nanoparticles during the synthesis step for their potential biological applications9. Moreover, engineered peptides have been synthesized using selection techniques such as phage, cell surface and yeast display to synthesize metal nanoparticles10. These peptides not only bind specifically and strongly to a range of different metal, semiconductor, oxide and biomineral surfaces but also precisely control the shape and the size of inorganic nanoparticles mineralized from the atom up10. However, a number of questions arise about the mechanism of how peptides control morphology and the size of nanoparticles. If the synthesis mechanism will be better understood, biologically significant peptides may be used to synthesize advanced materials for several applications in biocatalysis, imaging, health and therapeutics. To the best of our knowledge, no efforts have been made to synthesize antimicrobial and biocompatible gold nanoparticles using AMPs.
Furthermore, implants and biomedical devices associated infections are very common in patients, which pose serious challenges to medical and healthcare industries. Implant removal and replacement with a new implant are often practiced, which is indeed an expansive procedure. The biofilms formed on the surface of implant protects microorganism from conventional administered antibiotics and immune response from human body. Beyond that, the exposure of antibiotics for longer periods can promote the development of antibiotic resistance phenotypes, which lead to devastating effects to control the infection in absence of valid medical treatments. Various covalent and non-covalent coatings have been developed using antibiotics (Rai, A.; Prabhune, A.; Perry, C. C. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 6789. b) Shukla, A.; Avadhany, S. N.; Fang, J. C. Hammond, P. T. Small 2010, 21, 2392. c) Hanna, H.; Benjamin, R.; Chatzinikolaou, I.; Alakech, B.; Richardson, D.; Masfield, P.; Dvorak, T.; Munsell, M. F.; Darouiche, R.; Kantarjian, H.; Raad, I. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 3263, d) Aumsuwan, N.; McConnell, M. S. Urban, M. W. Biomacromol. 2009, 10, 623), quaternary ammonium salts (Lee, S. B.; Koepsel, R. R.; Morley, S. W.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Sun, Y.; Russell. A. J. Biomacromol. 2004, 5, 877. b) Murata, H.; Koepsel. R. R.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Russell, A. J. Biomater. 2007, 28, 4870), phenol derivatives (Chung, D.; Papadakis, S. E.; Yam, K. L. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 38, 165), titanium oxide (Fu, G.; Vary, P. S.; Lin, C-T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8889. b) Matsunaga, T.; Tomoda, R.; Nakajima, T.; Nakamura, N.; Komine, T. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988, 54. 1330) and heavy metals such as silver (Silver, S. Fems Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 341. b) Atiyeh, B. S.; Costagliola, M.; Hayek, S. N.; Dibo, S. A. Burns 2007, 33, 139. c) Dowling, D. P.; Donnelly, K.; McConnell, M. L.; Eloy, R.; Arnaud, M. N. Thin Solid Films 2001, 398, 602) and tin derivatives (Omae, I. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 17, 81) to combat microbial infection however, there is limited success with these coatings in order to achieve potent antimicrobial surfaces with less cytotoxicity effect. Another drawback with these technologies is that probably microorganisms would develop resistance against these coatings after frequent usages (Page, K.; Wilson, M.; Parkin, I. P. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 3819). Thus, there is of increasing interest to develop robust coatings for biomedical implants with broad spectrum antimicrobial activity, which would not only kill microorganisms and prevent the growth of biofilms but would also have less effect on the development of bacterial resistance against coatings.
As said before, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), non-classical drugs, are alternative to other antimicrobial drugs due to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities and ability to modulate immune response and no toxicity to host cells ((a) Onaizi, S. A.; Leong, S. S. J. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 67. b) Costa, F. Carvalho, I. F. Montelaro, R. C. Gomes, P.; Martins, C. L. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7, 1431. c) Andreu, D.; Rivas, L. Biopolym. 1998, 47, 4 and Hilpert, K.; Elliott, M.; Jenssen, H.; Kindrachuk, J.; Fjell, C. D.; Korner, J.; Winkler, D. F. H.; Weaver, L. L.; Henklein, P.; Ulrich, A. S.; Chiang, S. H. Y.; Farmer, S. W.; Pante, N.; Volkmer, R.; Hancock, R. E. W. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16, 58) Reddy, K. V.; Yedery, R. D.; Aranha, C. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2004, 24, 536.). AMPs are short (15-50 amino acids), highly cationic in nature with a large variation in net positive charge and have tendency to adopt amphipathic structures ((a) Onaizi, S. A.; Leong, S. S. J. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 67. b) Costa, F Carvalho, I. F. Montelaro, R. C. Gomes, P.; Martins, C. L. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7, 1431. c) Andreu, D.; Rivas, L. Biopolym. 1998, 47, 4 and Hilpert, K.; Elliott, M.; Jenssen, H.; Kindrachuk, J.; Fjell, C. D.; Korner, J.; Winkler, D. F. H.; Weaver, L. L.; Henklein, P.; Ulrich, A. S.; Chiang, S. H. Y.; Farmer, S. W.; Pante, N.; Volkmer, R.; Hancock, R. E. W. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16, 58 and Reddy, K. V.; Yedery, R. D.; Aranha, C. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2004, 24, 536; and a) Perron, G. G.; Zasloff, M.; Bell, G. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2006, 273, 251. b) Vant Hof, W.; Veerman, E. C.; Helmerhost, E. J.; Amerongen, A. V. Biol. Chem. 2001, 382, 597). In recent year, many strategies such as physical (layer by layer assembly) ((a) Etienne, O.; Gasnier, C.; Taddei, C.; Voegel, J-C.; Aunis, D.; Schaaf, P. Metz-Boutigue, M-H.; Bolcato-Bellemin, A-L.; Egles, C. Biomater. 2005, 26, 6704. b) Etienne, O.; Picart, C.; Taddei, C.; Haikel, Y.; Dimarcq, J. L.; Schaaf, P.; Voegel, J. C.; Ogier, J. A.; Egles, C. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 3662) and covalent immobilization methods ((a) Bagheri, M.; Beyermann, M.; Dathe, M. A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemotherap. 2009, 53, 1132. b) Haynie, S. L.; Crum, G. A.; Doele, B. A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemotherap. 1995, 39, 301. c) Ferreira, L.; Zumbuehl, A J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 7796) have been reported in literature for coatings of AMPs on different surfaces with maintenance of their activity. Effects of different parameters including type, length and flexibility of spacers and orientation and concentration of AMPs on the activity of immobilized peptides have been studied to develop efficient, safe and long-lasting antimicrobial implants and devices ((a) Onaizi, S. A.; Leong, S. S. J. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 67. b) Costa, F. Carvalho, I. F. Montelaro, R. C. Gomes, P.; Martins, C. L. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7, 1431. c) Andreu, D.; Rivas, L. Biopolym. 1998, 47, 4 and Hilpert, K.; Elliott, M.; Jenssen, H.; Kindrachuk, J.; Fjell, C. D.; Korner, J.; Winkler, D. F. H.; Weaver, L. L.; Henklein, P.; Ulrich, A. S.; Chiang, S. H. Y.; Farmer, S. W.; Pante, N.; Volkmer, R.; Hancock, R. E. W. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16, 58 and Reddy, K. V.; Yedery, R. D.; Aranha, C. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2004, 24, 536., and a) Perron, G. G.; Zasloff, M.; Bell, G. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2006, 273, 251. b) Van't Hof, W.; Veerman, E. C.; Helmerhost, E. J.; Amerongen, A. V. Biol. Chem. 2001, 382, 597 and a) Bagheri, M.; Beyermann, M.; Dathe, M. A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemotherap. 2009, 53, 1132. b) Haynie, S. L.; Crum, G. A.; Doele, B. A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemotherap. 1995, 39, 301. c) Ferreira, L.; Zumbuehl, A J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 7796 and a) Humblot, V.; Yala, J-F.; Thebault, P.; Boukerma, K.; Hequet, A.; Berjeaud, J-M.; Pradier, C-M. Biomater. 2009, 30, 3503. b) Gao, G.; Yu, K.; Kindrachuk, J.; Brooks, D. E.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Kizhakkedathu, J. N. Biomacromol. 2011, 12, 3715. c) Gabriel, M.; Nazmi, K.; Veerman, E. C.; Amerongen, A. V. N.; Zentner, A. Bioconj. Chem. 2006, 17, 548. d) Hilpert, K.; Elliott, M.; Jenssen, H.; Kindrachuk, J.; Fjell, C. D.; Korner, J.; Winkler, D. F. H.; Weaver, L. L.; Henklein, P.; Ulrich, A. S.; Chiang, S. H. Y.; Farmer, S. W.; Pante, N.; Volkmer, R.; Hancock, R. E. W. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16, 58. e) Steven, H. D.; Hotchkiss, J. H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 2665. f) Appendini, P.; Hotchkiss, J. H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 81, 609. g) Cho, W. M.; Joshi, B. P.; Cho, H.; Lee, K. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 5772). To the best of our knowledge, not many studies have been done to demonstrate the antimicrobial activity of immobilized AMPs in the presence of human serum, except one study where the AMP conjugated with polymer brush on the titanium surface was showed to have excellent antimicrobial activity in vivo (Gao, G.; Lange, D.; Hilpert, K.; Kindrachuk, J.; Zou, Y.; Cheng, J. T. J.; Kazemzadeh-Narbat, M.; Yu, K.; Wang, R.; Straus, S. K.; Brooks, D. E.; Chew, B. H.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Kizhakkedathu, J. N. Biomater. 2011, 32, 3899).
One of the embodiments of the present invention is to develop techniques for robust coatings of antimicrobial peptide (AMP) on various surfaces with its antimicrobial activity in the presence of human serum. Cecropin-mellitin (CM) is an antimicrobial peptide present in with cysteine at C-terminal was chosen to immobilize on the gold nanoparticle coated glass and titanium surfaces. CM peptide is a hybrid antimicrobial peptide with 15 amino acid lengths, containing sequences from cecropin-A and mellitin antimicrobial peptides. Cystamine and thiol-PEG-amine were used to functionalize surfaces to study the effect of chain length and flexibility of both molecules on antimicrobial activity of the tethered CM peptide. A large amount of CM peptide per centimeter square (1.02 mg/cm2) was immobilized on the thiol-PEG-amine functionalized surface compared to other reported method ((b) Gao, G.; Yu, K.; Kindrachuk, J.; Brooks, D. E.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Kizhakkedathu, J. N. Biomacromol. 2011, 12, 3715. c) Gabriel, M.; Nazmi, K.; Veerman, E. C.; Amerongen, A. V. N.; Zentner, A. Bioconj. Chem. 2006, 17, 548 and Gao, G.; Lange, D.; Hilpert, K.; Kindrachuk, J.; Zou, Y.; Cheng, J. T. J.; Kazemzadeh-Narbat, M.; Yu, K.; Wang, R.; Straus, S. K.; Brooks, D. E.; Chew, B. H.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Kizhakkedathu, J. N. Biomater. 2011, 32, 3899 and Kazemzadeh-Narbat, M.; Kindrachuk, J.; Duan, K.; Jenssen, H.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Wang, R. Biomater. 2010, 31, 9519). A small amount of CM peptide tethered on cystamine-functionalized surface acts as bacteriostatic while a large amount tethered on cystamine or thiol-PEG-amine functionalized surface acts as bactericidal, which is supported by AFM analysis. The CM peptide tethered on the gold nanoparticle coated titanium surfaces maintains antimicrobial activity in the presence of human serum with an excellent reusability for five cycles.
The disclosed subject-matter relates to an antimicrobial coating composition for coating articles comprising an antimicrobial peptide; a nanoparticle bound to said antimicrobial peptide; wherein the composition is suitable to be bonded to the surface of the article.
The said composition could be used as coating composition of medical devices and laboratory surfaces.
An embodiment of the present subject matter relates to an antimicrobial coating composition for coating articles comprising an antimicrobial peptide and a nanoparticle bound to said antimicrobial peptide; wherein the composition is suitable to be bonded to the surface of the article.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the nanoparticles may be a metal nanoparticles or a nanoparticle covered by a metal layer, preferably said nanoparticle have a size between 10-100 nm, preferably 15-50 nm, more preferably 20-30 nm.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the antimicrobial peptide could a cysteine at C-terminal, preferably an antimicrobial peptidomimetic, a small molecule mimetic of AMP.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the antimicrobial peptide could be selected from the following group: cecropin-mellitin, magainin, dermaseptin, cathelicidin, defensins, protegrins, others that anyone skilled in the art will recognized.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the composition may further comprises a binder, preferably a molecule, more preferably a polymer, even more preferably may be a polycation or a polyanion. In a preferably embodiment said polymer may be a polydopamine.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the binder may be bonded to the surface of the article by heating.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the nanoparticles could be obtainable by using an antimicrobial peptide as template.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the composition may further comprises a buffer, preferably selected from the following group: TAPS, Bicine, Tris, Tricine, TAPSO, HEPES, TES, MOPS, PIPES, Cacodylate, SSC, MES.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the composition may further comprises an antifouling agent as a spacer, preferably PEG.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, the antimicrobial peptide concentration may be between 0.5 and 1 mM, preferentially between 0.20 and 0.10 mM.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described, metal nanoparticles could be gold, titanium, silver or mixtures thereof.
In another embodiment of the antimicrobial coating composition described could be use in medicine, preferentially to coated an article with the antimicrobial composition described. More preferably said article is a medical device, even more preferably said medical device is an implant, a tongue depressor, a medical thermometer, a blood sugar meter, a medical robot, a microchip implant, a surgical tool or a neuroprosthesis.
Another aspect relates to a process for coating articles with the antimicrobial coating composition descried comprising the following steps:
The figures which fall under the scope of the claims represent embodiments of the disclosure subject matter, all others are reference figures
The invention relates to an antimicrobial coating composition for coating articles comprising an antimicrobial peptide; a nanoparticle bound to said antimicrobial peptide; wherein the composition is suitable to be bonded to the surface of the article.
More preferably: the nanoparticles are suitable to be bonded to the surface of the article by heating, or the composition further comprises a binder for attaching the composition to the surface of the article.
In the present subjecmater, the impact of antimicrobial peptide (ex: cecropin melettin) and buffer (ex:HEPES—(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid)) concentrations, pH of buffer and peptide chain on the gold nanoparticle formation process was studied under ambient conditions using experimental and molecular modeling approaches. Cecropin melettin (CM) peptides with and without cysteine at C-terminal are used for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles. It is found that thiol group of cysteine residue plays a critical role in controlling the size and morphology of gold nanoparticles via the digestive ripening and surface reactivity processes. The CM peptide capped gold nanoparticles have excellent properties of killing both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in MIC range of 10 μg/mL in the presence of human serum along with resistance to protease degradation and biocompatibility to human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC) and normal human dermal fibroblast (NDHF) cells up to concentration of 100 μg/mL.
Furthermore, bacterial colonization and subsequent infections are believed to be one of the main reasons for the failure of biomedical implants. There are several coatings approaches using antibiotics, quaternary ammonium salts, polycation and photosensitiser antimicrobial materials, however none of them succeeded due to less antimicrobial activity and more cytotoxicity effect. In the present invention, is described a robust coating procedure on the gold nanoparticle coated glass and titanium surfaces using cecropin-melittin (CM) peptide. The CM peptide was covalently grafted on cystamine and thiol-PEG-amine functionalized surfaces using bilinker sulfo-GMBS with maintenance of its potent antimicrobial activity. A small amount of tether CM peptide on cystamine-sulfo GMBS functionalized surface acts as bacteriostatic while a large amount of tethered CM peptide on both surfaces acts as bactericidal. The CM peptide tethered on binary self-assembled monolayers of thiol-PEG-amine and thiol-PEG-acid has potent antimicrobial activity in the presence of 20% human serum with excellent reusability up to 5 cycles.
HAuCl4.3H2O, NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4 (preferably, Sigma-Aldrich) and HEPES (preferably, Anal Chem) were used as received. Cecropin melettin with cysteine (KWKLFKKIGAVLKVLC) and without (KWKLFKKIGAVLKVL) peptides, preferably from Caslo Laboratory, Denmark. Human Serum AB, preferably, from Invitrogen.
0.5 mM CMC (Cecropin melettin peptide with cysteine) and CM (Cecropin melettin without cysteine) Peptides were dissolved initially in 50 μL DMF followed by addition of 950 μL HEPES (100 mM, pH 7.5) or milli-Q water. Gold ions were added in peptide solutions (0.25 mM) to get the final gold concentration of 0.5 mM at different conditions for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles at 25° C. (Table SI 1):
Time dependent UV-vis spectra were recorded, preferably, using BioTek synergy MX microplate reader to monitor the reduction of gold ions. Gold nanoparticles were also synthesized using HEPES with similar concentration of gold ions without peptides. To understand the effect of thiol group, 0.25 mM cysteine dissolved in HEPES was added in reduction solutions containing gold ions (0.5 mM) and HEPES (100 mM) or gold ions, HEPES and CM peptide (0.25 mM) at HH condition. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements of gold nanoparticle samples were carried out on Jeol A minimum of 100 nanoparticles was measured using Image J software for the particle size analysis.
The synthesized gold nanoparticle solutions were centrifuged at 14000 rpm followed by washing with mill-Q water to remove unreacted peptides and HEPES. The centrifuged gold nanoparticles were frozen and fridge dried at 223 K using . . . Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of peptide capped gold nanoparticles and gold nanoparticles synthesized without peptides was performed using over a temperature range of 30-600° C. at a heating rate of 10° C./min in presence of N2 gas. The binding of peptide on gold nanoparticle surface was analyzed, preferably by FTIR spectroscopy in ATR mode using JASCO spectrophotometer at 4 cm-1 resolutions with 64 scans. Zeta (ζ) potential of the synthesized gold nanoparticles after centrifugation and redispersion in HEPES were measured, preferably, using Brukerheaven instrument at room temperature.
S. aureus and E. coli were grown at 37° C. and maintained on LB plates (preferably, Luria-Bertani broth with 1.5% agar). Bacteria were also grown in LB media for overnight at 37° C. and cell counts were quantified by OD 600 measurements. Different amounts of peptide capped gold nanoparticles, peptide (5-10 μg/mL) and HEPES reduced gold nanoparticles (10 μg/mL) were added into bacterial suspensions (105 bacteria/mL) in presence of 10% human serum and incubated for 4 h at 37° C. 100 μL aliquots were taken out from the respective suspensions at 2 h intervals and diluted in PBS buffer to give 103 bacteria per mL and plated on LB agar plates followed by incubation at 37° C. Colonies were counted after 24 h of incubation. In another experiments, citric acid reduced gold nanoparticles were functionalized with 1 mg/mL mPEG-thiol (5 kDa). Gold nanoparticles were synthesized using citric acid as described previously (11). PEG and CMC peptide coated gold nanoparticles were incubated with 10% human serum for 2 hr at 4° C. followed by centrifugation at 14000 rpm to discard free human serum. Similarly, to study protease degradation, CMC coated gold nanoparticles and bare CMC peptides were treated with 1 mg/mL trypsin (phosphate buffer pH 8) for 2 h at 37° C. After 2 h of reaction, the nanoparticle solution was subjected to centrifugation to remove trypsin. Antimicrobial test was performed with human serum and trypsin treated peptide capped gold nanoparticles against E. coli.
The growth kinetic of gold nanoparticles synthesized under different conditions (HH, HW, WH and WW) using HEPES buffer (100 mM and pH 7.5) and cecropin melletin (CMC) peptide (0.25 mM) at 25° C. was followed by UV-Vis spectroscopy.
To understand the role of peptide chain in nanoparticle formation process, the same sequence of peptide without thiol group (CM peptide) was used for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles. The synthesis of gold nanoparticles in HH condition was comparably fast with the reduction being saturated within 2 days, albeit red solution started appearing after 12 hr of reaction (
In fact, when cysteine (0.25 mM) was added in solution containing HEPES and gold ions without peptides, it was observed that the synthesis of gold nanoparticles was rapid (30 min) similar to reaction without cysteine (curve 1 and 2,
The pH of HEPES buffer also affects the reduction rate and the size of nanoparticles. The varying pH of reaction solution alters the charge of CMC peptide and the speciation of gold ions, which influence significantly the affinity of peptide to Au(0), resulting into a disproportionate ratio of critical concentration of peptide-Au(0) complex and free Au(0) in the reaction solution. With decreasing pH of HEPES buffer, the reduction time of gold ions changed drastically to 24 hr and finally to 1 hr for pH 6 and 5 respectively (
Thermogravimatric analysis (TGA) of the gold nanoparticles synthesized in different conditions was performed to obtain quantitative information of the peptide content. The initial 2 to 8% weight loss in temperature region of 30 to 240° C. is due to desorption of water molecules from samples (
To compliment TGA analysis, FTIR spectroscopy was performed to analyze the binding of peptide on the gold nanoparticle surface. Curve 1,
The CMC peptides adopt α-helical structure in the presence of membrane or helix promoting organic solvents, which triggers them to act as a potent antimicrobial agent 20, 22. In order to validate the antimicrobial activity of synthesized gold nanoparticles in the HH condition (HH-Au NPs), HH-Au NPs were tested against Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria for different incubation times in the presence of 10% human serum to mimic in-vitro tissue culture condition. The gold nanoparticles synthesized in the HH condition were chosen due to high loading of peptide. The amount of HH-Au NPs used for antimicrobial test was taken in the range of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CMC peptide (5 μg/mL) as reported previously (
The highly cationic CMC peptides first associate with bacterial membrane via electrostatic interactions and then peptides, transformed into α-helical structures after being contacted with membrane, span through the lipid bilayer7e,21-22. The long chain peptide expands the membrane surface upon insertion to create pores21, 22. It's suggest that the combined action of peptides to form pores/ion channels and the gold nanoparticles to generate holes raptures completely the bacterial membrane, which leads to leakage of cell content and finally cell death. In synergy with above action, the inserted gold nanoparticles may be bound to cellular contents (DNA) of bacteria and prevent transcription and translation processing to repair the damage2a, 4a.
Trypsin, a lytic protease found in living system, can degrade AMPs thereby limiting their potential to become next-generation antibiotics. There is several reports in which expensive and tedious methods were adopted to synthesize different analogies of CM peptides in order prevent their degradation from trypsin7e, 21, 24. In contrary, the HH-Au NPs are resistance to 1 mg/mL trypsin and showed no sign of aggregation after 2 hr of incubation that can be attributed to nanoparticles associated protection of peptides from proteases (curve 3,
All chemicals (cystamine dihydrochloride, sodium citrate, mono sodium phosphate, disodium phosphate, gold (III) chloride trihydrate, BCA kit), preferably from Sigma Aldrich. CM peptide with 98% purity, preferably fromCaslo laboratory (Lyngby, Denmark). Thiol-PEG-amine (1 kDa) and thiol-PEG-acid (1 kDa), preferably from Creative PEG works (Winston Salem, North Caroline, USA). Human serum, preferably from Invitrogen. All media components for bacterial media, preferably from Frilabo, Portugal. All glassware were cleaned with soap solution followed by aqua regia (1 mL HNO3 (15.9 M): 3 mL HCL (12 M)) and rinsed with Milli-Q water. Glass coverslips, preferably from VWR and Menzel and titanium disks. Escherichia coli (E. coli) (ATCC 25922) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) (ATCC 6538) were used for antimicrobial study.
The gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) were synthesized using Turkevich's method (Turkevich, J.; Stevenson, P. L.; Hillier, J.; Discuss Faraday Soc. 1951, 11, 55. In general, 90 mL of 10-4 M HAuCl4 solution in Erlenmyer flask was boiled followed by addition of 10 mL of 0.2 gm of sodium citrate. The solution was boiled until the color of solution changed from light yellow to ruby-red. Circular glass slides were rigorously cleaned before use by submerging into piranha solution (30% H2O2+70% H2SO4) for 1 h. Subsequently they were washed with copious amounts of Milli-Q water. The cleaned glass slides were dipped in 1% of 3-amino propyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) in ethanol for 30 min followed by cleaning with ethanol. APTMS functionalized glass slides were immersed in the gold nanoparticle solution for 24 hr to deposit gold films. The deposited gold nanoparticle coated surfaces were washed twice with Milli-Q water and gently dried with N2 gas. To coat the gold nanoparticles on titanium (Ti) surface, Ti disks were cleaned with H2SO4 solution for 30 min. Other steps were followed as mentioned above.
Gold nanoparticles coated surfaces were functionalized with 20 mM cystamine and 1 mg/mL thiol-PEG amine (1 kDa) for 24 h followed by washing with water to remove unbound amine molecules. The quantification of amine functional group present on Au NPs coated glass surfaces was quantified using a picrate test as described before (Lee, C. C. Y.; Loudon, G. M. Anal. Biochem. 1978, 94, 60). The extinction coefficient of amine was considered to be 134700 for the estimation of concentration of amine molecules (Lee, C. C. Y.; Loudon, G. M. Anal. Biochem. 1978, 94, 60). Freshly prepared 1 mg/mL sulfo-GMBS in phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) was incubated with amine-functionalized surfaces for 2 h to modify the amine groups. Picrate test was again performed to quantify the free amine group on the surface. It should be noted that sulfo-GMBS modified cystamine and thiol-PEG-amine surfaces will be called CS and NS surfaces respectively throughout the paper for simplicity to explain the results. Different concentrations of CM peptide (1-3 mg/mL) dissolved in phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) were incubated with CS and NS surfaces for 24 h at 4° C. for covalent immobilization. The unbound peptide was removed by washing twice gently with phosphate buffer. The amount of peptide in remaining peptide solution after the immobilization and washings were quantified using BCA method as per manufacturer instructions (preferably, Sigma Aldrich). The CM peptide covalently immobilized per unit surface area (mg/cm2) on different surfaces was calculated.
The different stage of coating processes was characterized using a golden Gate attenuated total reflection (ATR) accessory in a Jasco spectrophotometer. All samples were dried completely before FTIR measurements. Spectra were recorded at resolution of 4 cm-1 with 128 scans being average and then smoothed by 11 points adjacent averaging.
Contact angle measurements were performed by acquiring images of 5 μL water drops on surfaces using. A picture of water drop was taken after immediately to avoid problems related to drying of the drop. Three images of each sample were taken from different areas of the surface, and tangent measurements at the drop surface interface were made and the contact angle calculated. The relationship between functional groups and water contact angle was assessed using the Wenzel equation where the apparent contact angle of a liquid on a surface that depends on the roughness and chemical composition of the surface (Wenzel, R. N. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28, 988).
Gram positive (S. aureus) and Gram negative (E. coli) were grown in Luria Broth (LB) media for 24 h at 37° C. 100 μL of bacterial suspensions were transferred in sterile vials containing 5 mL of LB media and incubated for 2 h at 37° C. to get mid logarithmic phase growth of bacteria then further diluted using LB media to achieve 105 CFU/mL bacteria. CM tethered surfaces were incubated in phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.2, PBS) for 4 h to leach out any unbound and physically adsorbed CM peptide. To test the antimicrobial activity of tethered CM peptide, different surfaces with CM peptide were incubated in 105 CFU/mL S. aureus and E. coli suspensions at 37° C. for 4 h. Aliquots (100 μL) were taken out from respective bacterial solutions at 30 min intervals and diluted to 105 CFU/mL in PBS and then plated on LB agar plates followed by incubation at 37° C. Colonies grown on plates were counted. All antibacterial activity tests were performed in triplicate and were performed at different times to certify the reproducibility of the data. The leached solution was also tested against E. coli and no killing of bacteria was observed. To test the reusability of CM peptide coated glass surface, this surface was incubated in E. coli for 4 h then washed with PBS and air-dried.
To test the antimicrobial activity of tethered CM peptide in the presence of human serum (HS), the above functionalization procedure with thiol-PEG-amine was slightly modified. After functionalization of the Au NPs coated glass surfaces with 1 mg/mL thiol-PEG-amine, these surfaces were further incubated with different amount of thiol-PEG-acid solution for 12 h to get different molar ratios of amine and acid (different molar ratios of amine to acid was denoted as N:C 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 4.1 and 5:1 in the manuscript). After 12 h, the functionalized surfaces were washed with ethanol to remove unbound molecules. Other steps to immobilize CM peptide on these surfaces were
similar as mentioned above using 3 mg/mL CM peptide. CM tethered N:C surfaces were incubated with 20% human serum for 2 h followed by washing with sterile PBS. Human serum (HS) was diluted in PBS to get 20% concentration. HS treated N:C surfaces were tested against E. coli. Similarly, Au nanoparticle coated titanium surfaces were immobilized with 3 mg/mL CM peptide using N:C 1:1 surface chemistry. CM immobilized Au nanoparticle coated Ti surfaces were treated with 20% human serum for 2 hr followed by antimicrobial activity test against E. coli.
Two human cell types such as human endothelial umbilical vein cells (HUVEC) as a model for vascularized tissues and normal dermal human fibroblasts (NDHF) one of the most common cell type present in human connective tissue were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity induced by CM peptide immobilized surfaces. HUVECs (preferably, Lonza, Cat. Number CC-2517, Walkersville, Md., USA) were cultured using endothelial growth factor-2 media (EGM-2), bullet kit media (preferably, Lonza, Cat. Number CC-3156) for at least 24 h prior to further use. Passages below six were used for all experiments.
NDHF cells (preferably, Lonza, Cat. Number CC-2511) were cultured with dulbecco's modified eagle's medium (DMEM) (preferably, Sigma, Cat. Number D5796) supplemented with 10% (v/v) of foetal bovine serum (preferably, Gibco, EU approved origin, Cat. Number 10270-106, Grand Island, N.Y., USA) and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (preferably, Lonza, Cat. Number DE17-602E). NDHF cells under passage number ten were used in order to maintain primary cell state during the time of assays performed.
Both HUVEC and NDHF cells were cultured in their respective media in tissue culture flasks with 75 cm2 of surface (BD, Falcon). Cells were trypsinized, centrifuged and counted for adequate assessment of cell number before seeding in the appropriate tissue culture plates for cytotoxicity investigations.
Soluble CM Peptide Interaction with Cells
HUVEC and NDHF cells were cultured as previously mentioned and platted at a density of 4.2×103 cells/cm2 in 24-well plates. Cells were allowed to grow 24 h prior to any experiments performed. Different concentrations of CM peptide solutions (50, 30, 20, 10, 5, 2.5 and 1 μg/mL) were incubated with both cells for 24 hr to evaluate the cytotoxicity effect of CM peptides using MTT cell metabolic activity assay.
Initially cells were washed with warm phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Cells treated with different concentrations of CM peptides after 24 h were incubated with working solution of thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide salt (MTT) solution (10 mL of media to 1 mL of stock solution of tetrazolium salt, 5 mg/mL in PBS) for 3 h at 37° C. in the C02 incubator with 5% air and 95% CO2. After 3 h of incubation, the formed purple formazan crystals were dissolved by dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) using a gentle agitation of the test plate in an orbital shaker. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm with reference to 670 nm in a UV-visible spectrophotometer (SynergyMx from Biotek Instruments, Winooski, Vt., United States) (I don't understand by reference).
In case of the direct contact assay, later on detailed explained, samples were transferred to a new plate before addition of MTT working solution to avoid miscalculation in the cellular activity. Using this strategy it is only taken into account the cells that were in contact with the surface under testing. For TCPS condition, obtained values were normalized for the same surface area as the modified samples to have for all the conditions the same surface area.
Extraction assay was performed to evaluate whether any leached CM peptide from surfaces in media has effect on metabolic activity of both cells. Au NP coated, N:C (1:1) coated and CM peptide immobilized on N:C (1.) coated Au NP surfaces were sterilized for 20 min using UV light source in laminar flow hood before the extracts were prepared. Extracts were prepared according to the international norm ISO 10993-5 and both culture medias were in contact with the previously mentioned surfaces of 3 cm2 area for 24 h in sterile conditions in an incubator at 37° C. with gentle agitation. Media recovered from surface treatment acts as extracts. Cells were seeded at a density of 4.2×103 cells/cm2 and allowed to grow 24 h before the extracts were added to the wells. The ratio of surface area of samples to media was kept constant to 3 cm2/mL in each experiment. Extracts were maintained in contact with the seeded cells for 24 h followed by the assessment of cytotoxicity using MTT assay.
Different surfaces sterile under UV light as mentioned above were used for direct contact assay. Both cells were seeded at a density of 4×104 cells/cm2 on the top different surfaces and allowed to grow for 24 h before cytotoxicity was assessed using MTT assay.
Samples were transferred to a new plate in order to avoid miscalculation in the cellular activity measured and to take into account only the cells that were in contact with the surface under testing. For TCPS condition, obtained values were normalized for the same surface area as the modified samples to have for all the conditions the same surface area (I did not understand).
Different types of modified glass surfaces were used for these analyses: glass coverslips coated with gold nanoparticles as a control and glass coverslips coated with gold and cecropin-mellitin antimicrobial hybrid peptide as AMP test samples.
Different surfaces used for direct contact assay with HUVEC and NDHF cells. In addition, samples of gold and AMP coated surfaces without any cell culture were also observed for control reasons.
Scanning electron microscope imaging was performed using a FEG ESEM/EDS/EBSD FEI Quanta 400 FEG ESEM/EDAX Genesis X4M (need to write just model name).
For quantification purposes ten images of different fields of the different samples in a total of three replicates (for NDHF cells only a number of two replicates was imaged) per condition was performed. The number of cells present per area of surface was calculated and plotted in a graphic to better understand the total number of cells present in each surface type. Images for this purpose were captured using a 200× magnification. Furthermore, cell morphology was detailed analyzed using images captured at higher magnifications such as 5000×, 40000×, 100000× or 200000×.
More accurate interpretation of cells and particles present in these samples was performed using Energy Dispersive Spectrum (EDS), which was acquired for specific area spots and to allow proper differentiation between organic and gold material.
LDH release assay was performed for cells treated with different surfaces in similar condition used for direct contact measurements. Three replicates was used per condition to get statstically significant data. The lactate dehydrogenase assay is simple and accurate method and the assay is based on the reduction of NAD to NADH by LDH. It allows a determination of the membrane integrity as a function of the amount of cytoplasmic LDH released into the media.
LDH release and respective total LDH measurements were determined according to manufacturer's procedure (preferably, Sigma, Cat. Number TOX7). For total LDH quantification, LDH assay lysis buffer was used prior to recovering the sample for testing. For all samples, a volume of LDH assay mixture, equal to twice the volume of media to be tested was added in opaque plate having media from cells treated with different surfaces. The plate was protected from light with aluminum foil and incubated for 20-30 minutes. Using a spectrophotometer (preferably, Synergy Mx, Biotek Instruments), the absorbance was determined at a wavelength of 490 nm and background at 690 nm. Later value was subtracted to the primary wavelength obtained reading (490 nm).
Cells were seeded in 8-well sterile Labtek chambers and cultured for at least 24 h. Subsequently, attached cells were stained after being washed with a solution of 0.5% of bovine serum albumin in phosphate buffer saline. A mixture of propidium iodide and 3,3′-dipentyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC5) (1 mg/mL) was allowed to react with the cells for 10 min at 37° C. The treated cells were then washed with PBS and were imaged using a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss, Germany). At least three images of each condition were captured for quantification purposes. Pictures were analyzed using Image J 1.45S software (National Institutes of Health, USA) and both channels were examined separately. The image of the channel corresponding to the propidium iodide dye that labels dead cells was inverted using the mentioned software prior to counting. Furthermore, the images of the channel corresponding to DiOC 5 were used as acquired and cell counter pluggin utilized for manual quantification of total number of cells expressing the molecule of interest (not clear). All the data was then plotted accordingly.
For all the experiments at least three replicates were analyzed. Data was analyzed using Prism Software for Macintosh (Version 4.0b, GraphPad Software, Inc., 2004) and plotted in the graphic format. Statistical t-student test was performed to compare different groups using a confidence interval of 95%.
Gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) were synthesized using well-known Turkevich method (Wenzel, R. N. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28, 988). Citrate stabilized gold nanoparticles were characterized using UV-Vis spectroscopy and TEM analysis.
In order to immobilize CM peptide on the Au NPs coated surfaces, cystamine and thiol-PEG-amine were chosen as spacers to functionalize surfaces (scheme 1). Cystamine reacts with gold on cleavage of sulfer-sulfer disulfide bond and thiol-PEG amine reacts via the thiol group, leading to availability of two amine groups per molecules on the cystamine coated surface compared to one amine group per molecule on thiol-PEG-amine coated surface (Rai, A.; Perry, C. C. Langmuir 2010, 26, 4152). However, picrate test shows 1.5 time higher amine groups on cystamine than thiol-PEG-amine coated surfaces after 24 hr incubation, which is in good agreement with XPS analysis (
There is a small increase in the number of amine groups on both surfaces after 1 hr of incubation; however it is crucial to incubate for 24 hr to obtain the organized monolayer on the surface (
Sulfo-GMBS is heterobifunctional cross-linker that contains NHS ester and meleimide groups. After modification with sulfo-GMBS, the amine band at 1630 cm-1 disappeared due to covalent reaction with N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester group of sulfo-GMBS and new bands appears. Similarly, increase in the number of nitrogen (N %) oxygen (% O) was observed in XPS analysis for the sulfo-GMBS modified surfaces (Table 3). No amine groups were detected using picrate test, indicating the modification of amine groups with sulfo-GMBS (Table 2). CM peptide having sulfhydryl group (—SH group) at C-terminus reacts covalently with freely available maleimide group of sulfo-GMBS on the Au NPs coated surfaces. Curves in Figure show the characteristic amide-I (C═O stretching mode) and amide-II (N—H bending mode at 1640 and 1560 cm-1 respectively. XPS analysis shows the presence of sulfur element on only CM peptide coated surfaces than other surfaces, indicating the presence of covalently attached CM peptide on both NS and CS surfaces (Table 3).
The amount of covalently immobilized CM peptide on the NS surface is estimated to be higher than that on the CS surface although the number of amine group is higher on cystamine functionalized surface. XPS analysis shows that % C, N and O are higher on the NS surface (Table 3). This is probably due to the fact that flexible and long chain thiol-PEG-amine on the NS surface promotes more immobilization, lateral diffusion and dense packing by interfacial rearrangement of CM peptide compared to the stiffed CS surface where steric hindrances between CM peptides dominate to inhibit the further adsorption (a) Hylton, D. M.; Klee, D.; Fabry, M.; Hocker, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 220, 198. b) Kleijn, M.; Norde, W. Heterog. Chem. Rev. 1995, 2, 157). Moreover, the coating of gold nanoparticles on the glass surface generates a high roughness, which in turn leads to immobilization of a large amount of peptide per cm2 surface area than other reported procedures ((b) Gao, G.; Yu, K.; Kindrachuk, J.; Brooks, D. E.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Kizhakkedathu, J. N. Biomacromol. 2011, 12, 3715. c) Gabriel, M.; Nazmi, K.; Veerman, E. C.; Amerongen, A. V. N.; Zentner, A. Bioconj. Chem. 2006, 17, 548 and Gao, G.; Lange, D.; Hilpert, K.; Kindrachuk, J.; Zou, Y.; Cheng, J. T. J.; Kazemzadeh-Narbat, M.; Yu, K.; Wang, R.; Straus, S. K.; Brooks, D. E.; Chew, B. H.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Kizhakkedathu, J. N. Biomater. 2011, 32, 3899 and Kazemzadeh-Narbat, M.; Kindrachuk, J.; Duan, K.; Jenssen, H.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Wang, R. Biomater. 2010, 31, 9519).
CM peptide is highly cationic in nature and adopts well defined structures upon interactions with bacterial membranes in solution and these structural changes are related to their potent antimicrobial activity ((a) Zasloff, M. Nature 2002, 415, 389. b) Brogden, K. A. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 238. c) Bastos, M.; Bai, G.; Gomes, P.; Andreu, D.; Goormaghtigh, E.; Prieto, M. Biophys J. 2008, 94, 2128. d) Melo, M. N.; Ferre, R.; Castanho, M. A. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 245). In case of tethered CM peptide on the surface, autolysis and bacterial death could be triggered due to the disturbance of surface electrostatics of bacterial membrane or the penetration of peptide into bacterial membrane upon electrostatic interactions with local positively charged surface ((d) Hilpert, K.; Elliott, M.; Jenssen, H.; Kindrachuk, J.; Fjell, C. D.; Korner, J.; Winkler, D. F. H.; Weaver, L. L.; Henklein, P.; Ulrich, A. S.; Chiang, S. H. Y.; Farmer, S. W.; Pante, N.; Volkmer, R.; Hancock, R. E. W. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16, 58 and Jelokhani-Niaraki, M.; Prenner, E. J.; Kay, C. M.; McElhaney, R. N.; Hodges, R. S. J. Pept. Res. 2002, 60, 23). Thus, high charge density on the surface associated with the amount of peptide, flexibility and length of spacer may contribute to antimicrobial activity of CM peptide tethered surfaces. In order to verify the activity of CM peptide tethered surfaces, different amounts of CM peptide immobilized surfaces were tested against Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria. As incubation time increases, CFU of S. aureus and E. coli decreases with increasing amount of CM peptide on the NS and the CS surfaces, showing evidence for the effectiveness of the CM peptide tethered surfaces for their antibacterial activity (
The control surfaces such as cystamine and thiol-PEG-amine coated gold surfaces did not show any antimicrobial activity (data not shown). The enhanced antimicrobial activity of CM peptide on the NS surface is due to combined effect of large amount of peptide, flexibility and long chain of thiol-PEG-amine molecule. The long chain and swelling of thiol-PEG-amine in the presence of buffer due to its water swelling property moves the CM peptide further from the surface thereby reducing the interaction between the peptide and the surface with maintenance of CM peptide activity ((a) Banerjee, I.; Pangule, R. C.; Kane, R. S. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 690. b) Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Bao, C.; Li, X.; Cao, L. Dai, K.; Zhu, L. Biomacromol. 2011, 12, 2389). Moreover, the flexibility of thiol-PEG-amine molecule provides lateral mobility to peptide and a large amount of peptide on the surface restricts conformational freedom of CM peptide, resulting into better interaction with bacterial membrane and thus the enhancement of bactericidal activity (Onaizi, S. A.; Leong, S. S. J. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 67. b) Costa, F. Carvalho, I. F. Montelaro, R. C. Gomes, P.; Martins, C. L. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7, 1431 and a) Humblot, V.; Yala, J-F.; Thebault, P.; Boukerma, K.; Hequet, A.; Berjeaud, J-M.; Pradier, C-M. Biomater. 2009, 30, 3503. b) Gao, G.; Yu, K.; Kindrachuk, J.; Brooks, D. E.; Hancock, R. E. W.; Kizhakkedathu, J. N. Biomacromol. 2011, 12, 3715. c) Gabriel, M.; Nazmi, K.; Veerman, E. C.; Amerongen, A. V. N.; Zentner, A. Bioconj. Chem. 2006, 17, 548. d) Hilpert, K.; Elliott, M.; Jenssen, H.; Kindrachuk, J.; Fjell, C. D.; Korner, J.; Winkler, D. F. H.; Weaver, L. L.; Henklein, P.; Ulrich, A. S.; Chiang, S. H. Y.; Farmer, S. W.; Pante, N.; Volkmer, R.; Hancock, R. E. W. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16, 58. e) Steven, H. D.; Hotchkiss, J. H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 2665. f) Appendini, P.; Hotchkiss, J. H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 81, 609. g) Cho, W. M.; Joshi, B. P.; Cho, H.; Lee, K. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 5772.). These results suggest that a low amount of peptide along with a short spacer chain length promotes bacteriostatic property perhaps by disturbing a low level of bacterial membrane electrostatics. While a high amount of peptide with short or long spacer chain length induces bactericidal activity in combination with penetration of peptide in the membrane and disturbance of membrane electrostatics (
The mechanism of antimicrobial activity is supported by AFM analysis. A height mode AFM image shows severely damaged and punctured membrane of E. coli treated with CM peptide tethered NS surface, while the smooth cell wall of E. coli is observed in control experiment where bacteria is incubated in Au NPs coated surface (
The orientation of CM peptide immobilized on the surface is an important criteria to achieve its maximum activity.
To the best of our knowledge, there is no research paper available related to antimicrobial activity of the tethered peptide in the presence of human serum. The CM peptide tethered NS surface did not show any antimicrobial activity after the surface being incubated in 20% human serum for 2 h. It is possible that human serum adsorbs on the top of CM peptide tethered surface and inhibits the activity of CM peptide. Thus, the coating procedure was slightly modified by introducing different molar ratios of thiol-PEG-amine to thiol-PEG-acid molecules. The rationale behind using mixed PEG molecules was to create the zwitterionic type surface and the high density of PEG molecules on the surface to prevent the adsorption of human serum ((a) Banerjee, I.; Pangule, R. C.; Kane, R. S. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 690, and a) Holmlin, R. E.; Chen, X.; Chapman, R. G.; Takayama, S.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 2001, 17, 2841. b) Vaisocherova, H.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, Z.; Cheng, G.; Pillarik, M.; Homola, J.; Jiang, S. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 7894. c) Chapman, R. G.; Ostuni, E.; Yan, L.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 2000, 16, 6927).
Cecropin-mellitin (CM) is one antimicrobial peptide in use for many years.
Different concentrations of soluble cecropin-mellitin peptide were placed in contact with both NDHF and HUVEC cells previously cultured for 24 h in TCPS 24-well plates. The objective was to prove that CM peptide does not affect cells while being active killing bacteria cells.
In these experiments it was detected that high levels of soluble CM peptide had statistical significant prejudicial effects in NDHF cell metabolic activity after 24 h of direct contact between cells and soluble peptide. It was found that CM concentrations between 10 and 2.5 μg/mL were particularly effective decreasing cell metabolic activity measured indirectly through the ability of cells to transform MTT salt in formazan crystals. Similar results were obtained for experiments with HUVEC. For this cell type negative influence of soluble CM peptide was also detected for the concentration of 1 μg/mL, which confirms that endothelial cells are a cell system not robust as fibroblasts or this is supported by the higher value of standard deviation determined for the 2.5 μg/mL CM soluble peptide condition.
Extraction assays were also performed using, for that purpose, media that has been in contact with different surfaces for 24 h under gentle agitation (150 RPM) at 37° C. Here, the main objective was to evaluate if there were some particles that would be leaching out from the surfaces and would therefore affect the behavior of cells that were in culture.
It was detected that, in the case of HUVEC cell cultures, extracts coming from AMP modified surfaces were drastically affected cells and their metabolic activity decreased.
A negative control was added to this set of conditions in order to destroy the cells and have a negative value for this influence, in this case hydrogen peroxide, which was effective for this purpose.
Direct contact of HUVEC cells with modified surfaces is shown below. Results show that there are differences between samples modified with AMP peptides and the ones modified with PEG-amine (PEG-NH2) and PEG-COOH only (NC chemistry samples). Controls for this experiment comprised cells seeded in tissue culture treated plastic (TCPS) and in non-modified glass coverslips that were previously washed in ethanol and dried with nitrogen gas as well as sterilized as all the others surfaces.
Significative differences between AMP modified surfaces and unmodified, either gold treated and gold treated plus NC chemistry, were found. Therefore it seems probable that the presence of the peptide is influencing the cell behaviour in contact with these specific surfaces.
Further experiments were also performed with normal human dermal fibroblasts (NDHF) in order to confirm if the same results would be obtained. Results here obtained showed that fibroblasts in direct contact with AMP modified surfaces had the metabolic activity decreased. Consequently, similar results were acquired for both cell types.
Fibroblasts and human umbilical vein endothelial cells would have different roles in the maintenance of specific cell populations in the adult human tissue and for this reason were here investigated. In this particular assay they behaved the same although endothelial cells are known to be more sensible cells than fibroblasts.
The invention is of course not in any way restricted to the embodiments described and a person with ordinary skill in the art will foresee many possibilities to modifications thereof without departing from the basic idea of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
The present invention is not, in any way, restricted to the embodiments described herein and a person of ordinary skills in the area can provide many possibilities to modifications thereof without departing from the general idea of the invention, as defined in the claims. The following claims set out particular embodiments of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 106532 | Sep 2012 | PT | national |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16144499 | Sep 2018 | US |
| Child | 17306456 | US | |
| Parent | 14427767 | Mar 2015 | US |
| Child | 16144499 | US |
