Referring to the exemplary drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
a) is a top view of a conventional CMP apparatus wherein the polishing pad and polishing head are depicted off-axis to illustrate a typical implementation;
b) is a side view of the CMP apparatus of
a) is a schematic diagram of a CMP apparatus with magnetically spinning slurry particles responsive to an alternating magnetic field, in accordance with a first embodiment of the invention;
b) is a side sectional view of the apparatus shown in
a) is a schematic diagram of a CMP apparatus with magnetically spinning slurry particles responsive to an alternating magnetic field, in accordance with a second embodiment of the invention;
b) is a side sectional view of the apparatus shown in
a) is a schematic diagram of a CMP apparatus with magnetically spinning slurry particles responsive to an alternating magnetic field, in accordance with a third embodiment of the invention; and
b) is a side sectional view of the apparatus shown in
Disclosed herein is an apparatus and method for implementing chemical mechanical polishing with improved uniformity. Briefly stated, a magnetic slurry is used in combination with an electromagnetic coil that provides a magnetic field of alternating polarity. The alternating magnetic field imparts a spin on the magnetic slurry particles, which in turn creates additional (and more uniform) pressure on the wafer, thereby enhancing erosion of material. Consequently, large wafers (e.g., 300 mm or more) may be polished with a high degree of uniformity, with the polishing rate less dependent upon the radial distance from the center of the chuck/pad. Furthermore, the need for radial adjustment of down force is minimized, and polishing can be carried out at reduced rotational speeds of the polishing head and/or pad.
a) and
Referring now to both
Although
As further shown in
In operation, the ferromagnetic slurry particles 112 (in the presence of an applied magnetic field of alternating polarity through coil 118) change their orientation so as to align their internal magnetization with the externally applied magnetic field. Coupled with a small amount of mechanical rotation (through the rotating pad 106 and/or chuck 102), the magnetic slurry particles 112 rotate between the pad 106 and the wafer 104. Because the rotation of the particles 112 is substantially uniform along the surface of the wafer 104, the resulting amount of energy, force and pressure applied to the wafer from 104 the spinning slurry particles 112 is also substantially uniform, thus leading to more uniform polishing.
The magnetic potential energy, E, of a solid particle having a magnetization, M, and a volume, V, is given by the expression:
E=(−V)M·B (eq. 1)
Wherein B represents the magnetic flux density of an external applied magnetic field applied to the particle.
Therefore, if the magnetic particle does not move when the polarity of the externally applied magnetic field switches from B to −B, then the energy difference, ΔE, between the two states becomes:
ΔE=2VMB (eq. 2)
Because staying in the same magnetic orientation as an external magnetic field changes direction is not an energetically “favorable” condition, the particle will, as a result, turn (i.e., spin) around in accordance with the least perturbation to the direction of the particle.
The volume of an individual slurry particle, having a radius, R, of about 1 micron is given as follows:
The term “remanence” refers to the residual magnetism left within a medium after an external magnetic field has been removed. A typical value of remanence for a ferromagnetic material is on the order of about M≈10,000 gauss (G)=1 tesla (T).
The magnetic flux density, B, generated by an electromagnetic coil is given by:
B≈μNI/L (eq. 4)
Wherein μ is the permeability of free space (air), N is the number of turns of wire around the electromagnet (e.g., 100,000), I is the current through the coil (e.g., 10 amperes) and L is the length of the magnetic circuit (e.g., 1 meter).
Applying these exemplary values for the coil 118 to equation 4 above, the generated magnetic flux density is approximately:
4π10−7m−1(100,000)(10A)/(1 m)=4π10−1T≈1T
For a magnetic force confined within a high permeability material, an order of magnitude estimation of force is given by:
Converting the above to an estimation of force per unit area (pressure), P, on the wafer yields:
It can thus be seen from the above calculations that the pressure magnetically generated on the substrate is comparable with the downward pressure of conventional CMP processing techniques. Although the polishing pad and the application of some downward pressure is still used to contain the magnetic slurry between the wafer and the pad (and to enable contact between the slurry and wafer), the slurry itself can generate about the same or even more pressure on the wafer for enhanced erosion of material through its magnetic coupling with the external magnetic field.
As stated above, the electromagnetic coil 118 (in addition to being located within a structurally isolated housing) could also being incorporated into the chuck 108 and/or polishing platen 102 as well. For example,
While not explicitly shown in the figures, one skilled in the art may easily construct another variant version of the second embodiment wherein the radius of the polishing platen is greater than the radius of the carrier head, and the two shafts for the rotation of the polishing platen and carrier head are off axis as described in
Finally,
As with the first and second embodiments, one skilled in the art can easily construct another variant version of the third embodiment wherein the radius of the polishing platen is greater than the radius of the carrier head and the two shafts for the rotation of the polishing platen and carrier head are off axis as described in
While the invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment or embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.