1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to marking scribes that encode data onto hard materials and more particularly to marking scribes that encode data represented by two-dimensional matrices.
2. Background Art
Marking systems used in applications such as part identification, tracking, inventory control, and order fulfillment are well known in the art. Early systems used characters attached to parts with tags, imprinted on parts with ink or paint, or punched into part surfaces. These forms of marking often required manual effort when marks were applied and additional manual effort when the marks were read. Later innovations including magnetic and optical alphanumeric data character recognition systems provided a degree of automated identification. A familiar and more recent system uses bar code recognition.
The previous and present systems solved many part identification problems and provided improved efficiencies, however a number of problems remain. For example, surface roughness and data character deterioration, debilitation and obscuration still affect identification accuracy and speed. Such problems usually worsen with time and wear, and demands for part tracking capabilities that extend beyond the manufacturing, storing and shipping of parts to the end of their useful lives have motivated the development of a two-dimensional marking process. This process features an advantageous pairing of small size and large data encoding capacity, and it facilitates full-life-cycle traceability of individual parts and assemblies.
The two-dimensional process, known as Direct Part Mark Identification (DPMI), includes the formation of a two-dimensional data matrix typically represented by a rectangular field of data cells arranged in columns and rows. The condition of each data cell represents a binary unit of information, and a number of processes have been developed to provide a detectable contrast between “marked” and “unmarked” data cells. Marking includes such processes as ink-jet printing, during which ink droplets are propelled onto the surface of a material being marked. Colored dye is left upon the surface when the ink evaporates. This process is capable of marking fast-moving parts and provides good contrast. Surfaces to be marked in this manner, however, often require preparation to ensure that the chemical reaction between the ink and the surface will maximize contrast and permanence of the mark.
Electrochemical etching is also used to mark part surfaces. During this process, a stencil is sandwiched between the part surface and an electrolyte-soaked pad; and a low electrical potential is applied across the part and the pad. This results in an oxidation of the exposed part surface, and produces a mark defined by the configuration of the stencil. This marking process commonly finds application in marking round surfaces and stress-sensitive parts. Disadvantages of electrochemical marking systems are that its automation can be difficult and that only conductive material can be processed.
Another part-marking process uses a laser to melt or vaporize the surface of a part to produce a detectable mark. Such a process can produce consistent, precision, round, square and linear marks at high speed. It is easily automated, requires no tool replacement, and requires only position fixturing. Marks produced are of high quality, but the quality is subject to interactions of the laser with the material being marked. Disadvantages of laser marking systems are that the equipment is relatively expensive and that the process is not readily applicable to irregular surfaces.
Dot peening is yet another part-marking process. It involves driving a stylus into the surface of a material being marked to leave, in a specific data cell, an indentation that contrasts with the surface of the material. The dot-peening process is relatively inexpensive, it produces good-quality marks, there is less material stress as compared to steel stamping processes, and there are no consumables. The parts, however, must be securely fixtured; and the noise level attending the process is relatively high. Also, in certain situations, marking surface preparation, such as cleaning or even machining, might be required to ensure code readability.
A programmable marking scribe having a material displacement stylus movable in three mutually orthogonal axes to displace material from an object being marked and create a two-dimensional matrix of recessed areas formed of grooves and surrounded by ridges, the grooves and ridges forming a reflectively multifaceted data cell having a collective reflectance that is in contrast with unmarked surface reflectance to enable a reader to clearly distinguish the former from the latter even in the presence of extraneous interfering marks and deposits.
The marking scribe has x-, y- and z-axis housings extending along x-, y- and z-axes, respectively, a stylus holder supported by the z-axis housing for mounting the stylus, and a programmable controller. It also has an x-axis driver supported by the x-axis housing for moving the y-axis housing parallel to the surface of the material and in a direction of the x-axis. A y-axis driver is supported by the y-axis housing for moving the z-axis housing parallel to the surface of the material and in a direction of the y-axis, and a z-axis driver is supported by the z-axis housing for moving the stylus holder at right angles to the surface of the material and in a direction of the z-axis.
The x-, y- and z-axis drivers are operatively responsive to signals generated by the programmable controller according to a program that calculates the size and disposition of individual recessed areas required to form a two-dimensional matrix pattern representing coded marking data. The programmable controller also dictates the motions of the stylus along each respective axis to form the pattern according to specified overall matrix dimensions. Each recessed area preferably has a rectangular configuration and is formed by the stylus in a series of only four movements along adjoining axes and in directions parallel to the material surface.
When not being used to create rectangular recessed areas for a two-dimensional matrix pattern representing coded marking data, the programmable marking scribe is capable of forming straight and curved lines as desired.
Also shown by
The marking scribe 10 includes an x-axis housing 50, a y-axis-housing 52 and a z-axis housing 54, each extending along x-, y- and z-axes (
At least one x-axis linear motion guide 76 (
A y-axis slide 114 is secured to the y-axis housing base plate 90. The y-axis slide 114 also supports and slidably guides at least one y-axis linear motion guide 110, which in turn is connected to a y-axis slide block 112. The y-axis slide block 112 is driven in a direction of the y-axis by the rotating y-axis ball screw 100 and is connected to the z-axis housing 54 for moving the z-axis housing 54 in a direction of the y-axis Y. An extendable and retractable y-axis protective bellows 116 (
The x-axis and y-axis slide blocks 78 and 112, respectively, preferably have circulating rolling elements, such as ball bearings, that roll between bearing surfaces of the portions of the x-axis and y-axis slide blocks 78 and 112, respectively, that serve as ball nuts and of grooves in the x-axis and y-axis ball screws 66 and 100, respectively, to reduce friction. The x-axis and y-axis slides 80 and 114, respectively, also preferably have circulating rolling elements, such as ball bearings, that roll between bearing surfaces of the x-axis and y-axis slides 80 and 114, respectively, and of the x-axis and y-axis linear motion guides 76 and 110, respectively, to reduce friction, increase rigidity and ensure the linearity of slide block motion.
In operation, information defining data to be included in a two-dimensional data matrix pattern representing coded marking data is supplied to the programmable controller 46 (
A quiet zone, generally indicated by the reference numeral 138, is provided around all sides of the data region 136 to aid the programmable controller 46 (
When a data cell is to be created, the programmable controller 46 (
At this point, the programmable controller 46 (
The programmable marking scribe of the present invention is capable of producing an accurate matrix within an average time of seven seconds. Data matrices tested using Automatic Identification and Mobility (AIM) verification standards earned a grade of “A” in a scale of grades from A (excellent) to F (fail) in test categories including data cell contrast, modulation, uniformity and unused error correction.
While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2818500 | Franck | Dec 1957 | A |
3598493 | Fisher | Aug 1971 | A |
4870922 | Robertson | Oct 1989 | A |
4881133 | Redlich et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4883291 | Robertson | Nov 1989 | A |
4972323 | Cauwet | Nov 1990 | A |
5015106 | Robertson et al. | May 1991 | A |
5119109 | Robertson | Jun 1992 | A |
5167457 | Cyphert et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5246319 | Prince et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5316397 | Robertson et al. | May 1994 | A |
5343031 | Yoshida | Aug 1994 | A |
5594991 | Therond | Jan 1997 | A |
5682657 | Hirose | Nov 1997 | A |
5785436 | Harrison et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5789892 | Takei | Aug 1998 | A |
5893668 | Harrison et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6070480 | Kerschner | Jun 2000 | A |
6157157 | Prentice et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6276225 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6423935 | Hackel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442852 | Shimotoyodome | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460257 | Shimotoyodome | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460258 | Shimotoyodome | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467405 | Breiholdt | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470782 | Shimotoyodome | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478206 | Shimotoyodome | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6536121 | Ishikawa et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6592261 | Mochizuki | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6719468 | Gatta | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729760 | Mochizuki et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6755125 | Andrew et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761482 | Ueno | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779441 | Jun | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804889 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6826840 | Lindsey et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6840721 | Kaule et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850592 | Schramm et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20030033104 | Gooche | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050086816 | Siegel | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060179670 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |