The invention relates to an apparatus and method for detecting overlapping objects, in particular mail items.
It is known that mail items, in particular letters, can be sorted by machine, wherein individual mail items are withdrawn from stacks of mail items to separate them. To determine whether, for example, two or more mail items have been drawn from the stack instead of a single mail item, a light source of a detector is used to illuminate the underside of the mail item once it has been drawn down and to produce an image of this. The image is used to check whether the mail item has a single edge or a number of edges, in order to decide whether there is a single mail item or a number of, for example, adhering mail items, hereinafter referred to as a double withdrawal, since individual mail items normally only have a single edge.
If a separated mail item has a number of mail items, it is not always an erroneous double withdrawal, but may be, for example, a reply slip to be attached to a mail item. Similarly, a single mail item may have peripheral lines so that the image appears to show a number of edges.
The known separation methods therefore have the disadvantage that it cannot always be reliably decided whether there is a single mail item or a number of mail items, which have been withdrawn from the stack as a double withdrawal.
There is therefore a need for an apparatus and method, which achieve greater reliability with regard to identifying double withdrawals, when the objects to be separated are drawn from a stack.
Accordingly, one aspect involves an apparatus for detecting overlapping flat objects, wherein each object has flat sides and narrow sides. The apparatus includes a doubles detector configured to derive at least one feature of an object, a first imaging unit configured to produce an electronic image of a first flat side of the object, and a second imaging unit configured to produce an electronic image of a second flat side of the object. A determination facility of the apparatus is coupled to the first imaging unit and the second imaging unit to receive the electronic images, and to derive at least one further feature of the object. Further, a decision facility of the apparatus is coupled to the doubles detector and the determination facility to receive the least one feature and the at least one further feature of the object, and to determine whether the object is a single object or a number of objects.
The apparatus provides for separated objects to be passed between two further imaging units, which respectively produce images of the two flat sides, which are used to derive at least one further object feature, which is supplied additionally to the decision facility to increase the reliability of decisions with regard to the presence of a single object or a double withdrawal. In order therefore to decide whether there is a single object or a double withdrawal with two or more mail items, object features of the flat sides are also used to make the decision, resulting in a significant increase in the reliability of the resulting decision.
The object feature derived using the image of the underside is in one embodiment the number of edges.
It is particularly advantageous if the object features of the flat sides derived using the images from the two further imaging units are the extension in the transport direction, the height, the number of corners of the contour and/or a list of distinguishable objects with defaults in respect of shape and size from a minimum size, such as lines, rectangles, triangles, franking features, their color distribution and position, with these being supplied alone or in combination as a set of object features to the decision facility.
One technically simple realization consists of the decision facility being embodied as a program running in a processor.
It is cost-effective if the imaging units are electronic color cameras in each instance.
Another aspect involves a method of detecting overlapping flat objects, in which at least one feature of an object is derived using a doubles detector. An electronic image of a first flat side of the object is produced using a first imaging unit, and an electronic image of a second flat side of the object is produced using a second imaging unit. At least one further feature of the object is derived using a determination facility configured to process the electronic images. The least one feature and the at least one further feature of the object processed using a decision facility to determine whether the object is a single object or a number of objects.
The method provides for images of the two flat sides to be produced additionally and to be used to derive at least one further object feature, which is used additionally to qualify the decision, in order to increase the reliability of the decision with regard to the presence of a single object or a double withdrawal.
The novel features and method steps characteristic of the invention are set out in the claims below. The invention itself, however, as well as other features and advantages thereof, are best understood by reference to the detailed description, which follows, when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
A determination facility 4 is coupled to the cameras 2, 3 and serves to define object features processing the electronic images from the two cameras 2, 3. From the electronic images of the object's flat sides the extension in the transport direction, the height, the number of corners of the contour and a list of distinguishable objects with defaults in respect of shape and size from a minimum size, such as lines, rectangles, triangles, franking features, color distribution and position are taken as object features. It is contemplated that further object features can be acquired and determined, as required.
The object features are supplied to a decision facility 7, for example, as a set of object features, as shown by an arrow 6. In one embodiment, the decision facility 7 is configured as processor running a suitable program. A trigger signal 5 serves to synchronize within the determination facility 4 data transmitted by the cameras 2, 3 with the run of mail items.
The decision facility 7 is further coupled to a doubles detector 8 to receive basic object features. As shown in
The doubles detector 8 is configured to illuminate the lower edge of the mail item 16 and to generate an image of the edge. The image of the edge is used in each instance to determine the number of edges as an object feature of the mail item 16. A trigger signal 9 of the doubles detector 8 serves to synchronize the passing mail items with the acquired object features. Transmission of the object features to the decision facility 7 is shown by an arrow 10 in
The decision facility 7 processes the respectively determined object features to make a double withdrawal decision 11, specifically whether the separated mail item 16 is a single mail item or a double withdrawal (a number of mail items attached to each other), which have for example continued to adhere to each other in an unwanted manner on withdrawal. For example, it is a single mail item if two edges are determined but one of the two flat sides clearly has the color and shape of a reply card.
Based on the double withdrawal decision 11 a machine controller 12 controls the facility for further transportation of the mail items in such a manner that all mail items that have not been identified as single mail items are ejected. The distance covered by the mail items is determined by the distance clock 13 and allows determination of the position of the mail items within the transport system.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 049 558 | Oct 2005 | DE | national |
The present application is a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/EP2006/007476, filed on Jul. 28, 2006, which designates the U.S. and which claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2005 049 558.3, filed on Oct. 12, 2005, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5534690 | Goldenberg et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
6817610 | Rompe | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7280797 | Moriyama | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20030091236 | Scicluna et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050105766 | Fesquet et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
89 15 957 | Jul 1992 | DE |
196 25 043 | Apr 1997 | DE |
102 33 052 | Feb 2004 | DE |
0 764 476 | Mar 1997 | EP |
2 546 083 | Nov 1984 | FR |
WO 2006016186 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090121163 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2006/007476 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 12082101 | US |