The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for determining liquid level in a steam drum or similar vessel operating at or near saturated conditions, and, more particularly, an apparatus and method that allows for a more accurate reading of the liquid level in a steam drum or similar vessel by compensating for variances in operating pressures and temperatures.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (“ASME”) has promulgated a Boiler Code, which, in pertinent part, states that “[a]t least one gage glass shall be readily visible to the operator in the area where control actions are initiated. Alternately, two dependable indirect indications shall be provided, either by transmission of the gage glass image or by remote level indicators . . . ” ASME Boiler Code, Section I, Part PG-60.1.1.
Since it is often difficult to have a gage glass in the immediate vicinity of the control room, the alternate option is typically preferred, wherein two indirect indications of liquid level in a steam drum or similar vessel are provided. In this regard, a master control system typically serves as the first indirect means of indication. The industry standard for power plants has been the use of a water column with conductivity probes as the second means of remote level indication (“RLI”).
Using a water column and conductivity probes, however, does not always provide the desired measurement accuracy. Indeed, it is common that the water column and conductivity probe arrangement provides measurements that are in disagreement with the computerized master control system, since the probe method is only accurate for one set of operating conditions.
However, such a method of remote level indication is rife with error as a standard water column with conductivity probes is only accurate at a single predefined set of operating conditions. Specifically, the density of the liquid in the water column 12 is not always the same as that of the liquid in the steam drum 10, especially at elevated operating temperatures and pressures. In this regard, as shown in
There is therefore a need for an apparatus and method for determining liquid level in a steam drum or similar vessel that overcomes the problems of the prior art, an apparatus and method that takes into account liquid density differences between a steam drum or similar vessel and a water column used for determining the level of liquid in the steam drum or similar vessel.
The present invention is an apparatus and method for determining liquid level in a steam drum or similar vessel, and, more particularly, an apparatus and method that allows for a more accurate reading of the liquid level in a steam drum or similar vessel by compensating for operating pressures and temperatures, which are often subject to rapid and continuous variations.
A steam drum or similar vessel operating at or near saturated conditions contains a mixture of liquid and vapor. In accordance with the present invention, the drum is provided with a temperature sensor which produces an electrical signal that is proportional to the temperature of the mixture, transmitting that signal to a processing apparatus, which is also referred to as a “multi-variable transmitter” herein. Then, at a lower tapping point, a line extends from and is in liquid communication with the drum, said line terminating at the multi-variable transmitter. At an upper tapping point, a second line extends from and is in liquid communication with the drum, said line terminating at a condensate pot. This condensate pot condenses steam from the vapor portion of the mixture to provide a constant reference leg for differential pressure measurement. A third line extends from and is in liquid communication with the condensate pot, said line terminating at the multi-variable transmitter.
The multi-variable transmitter includes one or more integral pressure sensors that allow for measurements of the pressure at the lower tapping point and in the condensate pot, which ultimately allows for a determination of the differential pressure between the drum and the constant reference leg. Furthermore, the multi-variable transmitter includes an integral microprocessor that calculates the specific gravity of the liquid and vapor portions of the mixture based on the measured operating pressure, thereby allowing for a computation of a density-compensated liquid level in the drum. A signal proportional to the computed liquid level is then preferably generated and transmitted from the multi-variable transmitter to a visual indicator.
The present invention is an apparatus and method for determining liquid level in a steam drum or similar vessel (especially any vessel operating at or near saturated conditions), and, more particularly, an apparatus and method that allows for a more accurate reading of the liquid level in a steam drum or similar vessel by compensating for operating pressures and temperatures, which are often subject to rapid and continuous variations.
Referring now to
The multi-variable transmitter 50 includes one or more integral pressure sensors 52, 54 that allow for a measurement of the pressure at the lower tapping point 34 (i.e., operating pressure) and in the condensate pot 44, which ultimately allows for a determination of the differential pressure between the drum 30 (at the lower tapping point 34) and the constant reference leg (i.e., in the condensate pot 44), as is described below. Various commercially available pressure sensors may be incorporated into the multi-variable transmitter 50, and the function of such pressure sensors is readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Furthermore, the multi-variable transmitter 50 includes an integral microprocessor 56 that calculates the specific gravity of the liquid and vapor portions of the mixture as a function of the measured operating pressure, which then allows for a computation of a density-compensated liquid level in the drum 30. With benefit of the description that follows, the necessary programming of such a microprocessor can be readily accomplished by one of ordinary skill in the art.
Referring now to the flow charts of
Furthermore, the “Span” must be considered, which is defined as the vertical distance between the upper and lower tapping points 34, 40 on the drum 30, as shown in
After the various inputs have been received, as indicated by reference numeral 120, certain values are calculated, including: (1) the differential pressure between the drum 30 and the constant reference leg, DP, as indicated by block 122; (2) the specific gravity of the condensate in the reference leg, sgC, as indicated by block 124; (3) the specific gravity of the liquid in the drum 30, sgL, as calculated using the operating pressure measurement and indicated by block 126; and (4) the specific gravity of the vapor in the drum 30 and reference leg, sgV, as calculated using the operating pressure measurement and indicated by block 128.
With respect to the calculations of the respective specific gravities, it should be recognized and understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that such values can be readily determined through mathematical computations carried out by the microprocessor 56 of the multi-variable transmitter 50 (as described above) and/or through interpolation of standard steam tables.
Once these values have been calculated by the microprocessor 56 of the multi-variable transmitter 50, a determination is made as to whether the temperature of the mixture exceeds the boiling point of the liquid (e.g., 212° F. for water at atmospheric pressure), as indicated at decision 130. If the temperature measurement is less than the boiling point of the liquid, the density-compensated liquid level in the drum 30 is then computed, as indicated at block 132, as follows:
Level=[(Span*sgC)−DP)/sgL (1)
Otherwise, if the temperature measurement is greater than the boiling point of the liquid, a determination is made as to whether the drum contents are in a saturated condition, as indicated at decision 134. Under most operating conditions, if the temperature measurement is greater than the boiling point of the liquid, it can be assumed that the drum contents are in a saturated condition, in which case this additional decision step is largely unnecessary. In any event, if the drum contents are not in a saturated condition, the density-compensated liquid level in the drum 30 is again computed as set forth in equation (1). If drum contents are in a saturated condition, the density-compensated liquid level in the drum 30 is computed, as indicated at block 136, as follows:
Level=[DP−Span*(sgC−sgV)]/[sgL−sgV] (2)
A signal proportional to the compensated level measurement is then preferably generated, as indicated by output 138. Then, referring again to
For purposes of example, assume that the steam drum 30 has a Span of 20 inches, with the Span again being defined as the vertical distance between the upper and lower tapping points 34, 40 on the drum 30. Furthermore, the steam drum 30 is operating a temperature of greater than 212° F. and at a pressure of 1700 psia, as determined by the measurement of the operating pressure in the constant reference leg by the multi-variable transmitter 50. Therefore, it is assumed that the drum contents are in a saturated condition. Finally, the differential pressure, DP, is measured at 10 inches of water by the pressure sensors 52, 54 of the multi-variable transmitter 50.
First, based on the operating pressure and the assumption that the drum contents are in a saturated condition, the respective specific gravities of the vapor (sgV) and the liquid (sgL) can be calculated, for example, through interpolation of standard steam tables.
sgV(1700 psia)=0.06828 (3)
sgL(1700 psia)=0.65826 (4)
Also, for most operating conditions, the specific gravity of the condensate (i.e., water), sgC, is assumed to be one:
sgC(1700 psia)=1.00 (5)
With these values calculated, the density-compensated liquid level in the drum 30 is computed using equation (2) above:
Level=[10 inches−20 inches*(1.00−0.06828)]/[0.06828−0.65826] (6)
Level=[10 inches−20 inches*(0.93172)]/[−0.58998] (7)
Level=14.635 inches (8)
As described above, a signal proportional to this compensated level measurement is then preferably generated and communicated to a bi-color display 48 or similar visual indicator.
One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional configurations are possible without departing from the teachings of the present invention or the scope of the claims which follow. This detailed description, and particularly the specific details of the embodiment disclosed, is given primarily for clarity of understanding, and no unnecessary limitations are to be understood therefrom, for modifications will become obvious to those skilled in the art upon reading this disclosure and may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the claimed invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3610208 | Penning | Oct 1971 | A |
4006635 | Khoi | Feb 1977 | A |
4567761 | Fajeau | Feb 1986 | A |
4711117 | Cosser | Dec 1987 | A |
4765945 | Walleser | Aug 1988 | A |
4827762 | Hasselmann | May 1989 | A |
5038611 | Weldon et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5131264 | Jensen | Jul 1992 | A |
5327773 | Nishimura et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5533074 | Mansell | Jul 1996 | A |
5559293 | Kirkpatrick | Sep 1996 | A |
5565851 | Richards et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5600997 | Kemp et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5732664 | Badeaux, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5811690 | Hershey | Sep 1998 | A |
5953954 | Drain et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6003366 | McGookin | Dec 1999 | A |
6053041 | Sinha | Apr 2000 | A |
6157894 | Hess et al. | Dec 2000 | A |