The present invention relates to the field of machining of hard metallic materials by cutting (e.g., shaping parts by removing excess material in the form of chips) with hard cutting tools, and more particularly to machining methods that reduce the thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer (e.g., white layer) on as-machined surfaces of hard metal workpieces and/or mitigate the detrimental effects in machined surfaces of hard metal workplaces due to the thermomechanical load of a hard cutting tool machining the workpiece.
Specifically, the invention concerns machining of hard metallic parts, characterized by the surface hardness exceeding 42 Rockwell on Scale C, with hard cutting tools, characterized by the edge hardness exceeding 1500 Vickers. Machining of hard or hardened metallic parts brings about significant cost savings to the manufacturing industries through the reduction of heat-treating and machining steps in the production cycle and minimizing the extent of slow, finish-grinding operations. With the advent of hard, ceramic cutting tools and tool coatings, which include alumina (Al2O3), cubic boron nitride (CBN) and many other advanced materials, machining of hard metals has become feasible and includes outer diameter (OD) turning, inner diameter turning (boring), grooving, parting, facing, milling, drilling, and numerous other cutting operations.
A significant limitation of the widespread use of hard metal machining is the so-called “white layer” effect, a microscopic alteration of the as-machined surface of a workpiece, which effect is produced in response to an extremely high thermomechanical load exerted at the as-machined surface by the cutting tool. Although not fully understood, the thermomechanically-affected workpiece surface comprising an etching-resistant white layer is undesired because of associated tensile stresses, e.g., reduced fatigue-resistance, lower fracture toughness, and/or reduced wear resistance of parts produced. See, B. J. Griffins, White Layer Formation at Machined Surfaces and Their Relationship to White Layer Formations at Wom Surfaces, J. of Tribology, April 1985, Vol. 107/165.
It has been reported that a sharper and/or not worn cutting edge, as well as the conventional flooding of a cutting tool with a water-based, emulsified oil coolant, contribute to the reduction in the detrimental tensile stresses and white layer. W. Konig, M. Klinger, and R. Link, Machining Hard Materials with Geometrically Defined Cutting Edges—Field of Applications and Limitations, Annals of CIRP 1990, Vol. 57, pp. 61-64. Hard machining with conventional flood cooling has been reexamined but found to be ineffective. H. K. Tonshoff and H. G. Wobker, Potential and Limitations of Hard Turning, 1st Int. Machining and Grinding Conf., Sep. 12-14, 1995, Dearborn, Mich., SME Technical Paper MR95-215. Moreover, sharp-finished cutting edges easily fracture in the case of inexpensive, Al2O3-based tools, leaving expensive CBN tools as the only current option. It has been noted that the use of coolants in hard machining should be avoided since cooling accelerates the edge wear and shortens overall life of CBN tools used for finish-hardturning. T. J. Broskea, PCBN Tool Failure Mode Analysis, Intertech 2000, Vancouver B. C., Canada, Jul. 17-21, 2000. Numerous other publications and machining textbooks have indicated that the use of coolants with inexpensive Al2O3 tools brings about a rapid fracture. Using non-cooled CBN tools (dry turning), the effect of cutting speed on white layer thickness during hardturning of a popular hardened bearing steel 52100 has been examined. Y. K. Chou and C. J. Evans, Process Effects on White Layer Formation in Hard Turning, Trans. of NAMRI/SME, Vol. XXVI, 1998, pp. 117-122. Results showed that only relatively low cutting speeds, translating into reduced productivity rates, assure an acceptably thin white layer. Thus, the machining technology of today offers no solution for making hard, white layer-free parts quickly and at reduced costs.
It is desired to have an apparatus and a method which minimize the alteration of workpiece surfaces during hard machining, and more specifically, which eliminate or minimize tensile and/or fluctuating surface stresses and etch-resistant white layer (i.e., the detrimental effects of “white layer”).
It is further desired to have an apparatus and method which produce better parts having less of the detrimental effects of a thermomechanically-affected layer (e.g., “white layer”) and which do so faster, at lower costs, and with less expensive tools.
Applicants' invention is an apparatus and a method for reducing a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of a hard metal workpiece, and an apparatus and a method for mitigating a detrimental effect of a thermomechanical load in a machined surface of a hard metal workpiece. Another aspect of the invention is an apparatus and a method for machining a hard metal workpiece using the aforesaid apparatuses and methods. Other aspects of the invention are the workpieces machined by the apparatus and method for machining.
A first embodiment of the method for reducing a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of a hard metal workpiece being machined by a hard cutting tool exerting a thermomechanical load on a surface of the workpiece includes reducing the thermomechanical load.
There are several variations of the first embodiment of that method. In one variation, the hard metal workpiece includes an iron-containing alloy. In another variation, the hard cutting tool is made at least in part of a material selected from a group containing a ceramic compound; a ceramic-ceramic composite; a ceramic-metal composite; a diamond-like, metal-free material; an alumina-based ceramic; a cubic boron nitride-based ceramic material; a tungsten carbide-based material; and a cermet-type material.
In another variation, the cutting tool initially has a first temperature prior to contacting the surface of the workpiece, and the thermomechanical load is reduced by cooling the cutting tool to a second temperature lower than the first temperature before the cutting tool contacts the surface of the workpiece or while the workpiece is being machined. In a variant of that variation, the cutting tool is cooled by an external cooling means. In one variant of that variant, the cooling means includes at least one cryogenic fluid. In another variant, the cooling means includes at least one inert, water-free coolant. In yet another variant, the cutting tool has a hardness and a resistance to cracking, and cooling the cutting tool with the cooling means results in an increase in the hardness or an increase in the resistance to cracking.
In another variation of the method, at least a portion of the thermomechanical load is a component of a cutting force, the component being applied in a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece, and the thermomechanical load is reduced by reducing the component of the cutting force. There are several variants of this variation. In one variant, the cutting tool has an inclination angle, and the component of the cutting force is reduced by making the inclination angle more positive. (The phrase “making the inclination angle more positive” is defined and discussed in the Detailed Description of the invention section below.) In another variant, the cutting tool has a rake angle, and the component of the cutting force is reduced by making the rake angle more positive.
A second embodiment of the method for reducing a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of a hard metal workpiece being machined by a hard cutting tool includes multiple steps. In this embodiment, the cutting tool initially has a first temperature prior to contacting the surface of the workpiece and exerts a thermomechanical load on a surface of the workpiece, at least a portion of the thermomechanical load being a component of a cutting force, the component being applied in a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece. The first step of the method is to cool the cutting tool to a second temperature lower than the first temperature before the cutting tool contacts the surface of the workpiece or while the workpiece is being machined. The second step is to reduce the component of the cutting force.
A first embodiment of the method for mitigating a detrimental effect of a thermomechanical load in a machined surface of a hard metal workpiece, the thermomechanical load being exerted on a surface of the workpiece by a hard cutting tool machining the workpiece, thereby forming the machined surface, includes cooling the machined surface by a cooling means having an initial temperature in a range of about −250° C. to about +25° C.
There are several variations of the first embodiment of that method. In one variation, the cooling means includes at least one inert, water-free coolant. In another variation, the cooling means includes at least one stream containing a cryogenic fluid or at least one ice particle having a temperature less than about −75° C. In another variation, the hard metal workpiece includes an iron-containing alloy. In another variation, the hard cutting tool is made at least in part of a material selected from a group containing a ceramic compound; a ceramic-ceramic composite; a ceramic-metal composite; a diamond-like, metal-free material; an alumina-based ceramic; a cubic boron nitride-based ceramic material; a tungsten carbide-based material; and a cermet-type material.
A second embodiment of the method for mitigating the detrimental effect is similar to the first embodiment, but also Includes cooling the cutting tool simultaneously by the cooling means.
In a third embodiment of the method for mitigating the detrimental effect, which is similar to the first embodiment, at least a portion of the thermomechanical load is a component of a cutting force, the component being applied in a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece. The method in this third embodiment includes reducing the component of the cutting force. In a variation of this embodiment, wherein the cutting tool has an inclination angle, the component of the cutting force is reduced by making the inclination angle more positive and the cooling means includes at least one stream containing a cryogenic fluid or at least one ice particle having a temperature less than about −75° C.
A fourth embodiment of the method for mitigating the detrimental effect is similar to the third embodiment, but includes cooling the cutting tool simultaneously by the cooling means. In a variation of the fourth embodiment, wherein the cutting tool has an inclination angle, the component of the cutting force is reduced by making the inclination angle more positive and the cooling means includes at least one stream containing a cryogenic fluid with at least one ice particle having a temperature less than about −75° C.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for machining a hard metal workpiece. There are several embodiments of this method.
A first embodiment of the method for machining a hard metal workpiece, whereby a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of the workpiece is reduced, the workpiece being machined with a hard cutting tool initially having a first temperature prior to contacting the surface of the workpiece, the hard cutting tool exerting a thermomechanical load on a surface of the workpiece, includes cooling the cutting tool to a second temperature lower than the first temperature before the cutting tool contacts the surface of the workpiece or while the workpiece is being machined.
A second embodiment of the method for machining a hard metal workpiece, whereby a detrimental effect of a thermomechanical load is mitigated in a machined surface of the workpiece, the thermomechanical load being exerted on a surface of the workpiece by a hard cutting tool forming the machined surface of the workplace, includes cooling the machined surface by a cooling means having an initial temperature in a range of about −250° C. to about +25° C.
A third embodiment of the method for machining a hard metal workpiece, whereby a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of the workpiece is reduced, the workpiece being machined with a hard cutting tool, the hard cutting tool exerting a thermomechanical load on a surface of the workpiece, at least a portion of the thermomechanical load being a component of a cutting force, the component being applied in a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece, includes reducing the component of the cutting force.
In a fourth embodiment of the method for machining, which is similar to the first embodiment, at least a portion of thermomechanical load is a component of a cutting force, the component being applied in a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece. The fourth embodiment includes reducing the component of the cutting force.
A fifth embodiment of the method for machining is similar to the second embodiment, but includes cooling the cutting tool simultaneously by the cooling means.
In a sixth embodiment of the method for machining, which is similar to the second embodiment, at least a portion of the thermomechanical load is a component of the cutting force, the component being applied in a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece. The sixth embodiment Includes reducing the component of the cutting force.
A seventh embodiment of the method for machining is similar to the sixth embodiment, but includes cooling the cutting tool simultaneously by the cooling means.
Another aspect of the invention is a workpiece machined by a method for machining as in any of the aforesaid embodiments and characterized by an improved surface or an improved property.
A first embodiment of the apparatus for reducing a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of a hard metal workpiece being machined by a hard cutting tool exerting a thermomechanical load on a surface of the workpiece, includes a means for reducing the thermomechanical load.
There are several variations of the first embodiment of that apparatus. In one variation, the hard metal workpiece includes an iron-containing alloy. In another variation, the hard cutting tool is made at least in part of a material selected from a group containing a ceramic compound; a ceramic-ceramic composite; a ceramic-metal composite; a diamond-like, metal-free material; an alumina-based ceramic; a cubic boron nitride-based ceramic material; a tungsten carbide-based material; and a cermet-type material.
A second embodiment of the apparatus for reducing a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of a hard metal workpiece being machined by a hard cutting tool initially having a first temperature prior to contacting the surface of the workpiece, the hard cutting tool exerting a thermomechanical load on a surface of the workpiece, at least a portion of the thermomechanical load being a component of a cutting force, the component being applied in a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece, includes: a means for cooling the cutting tool to a second temperature lower than the first temperature before the cutting tool contacts the surface of the workpiece or while the workpiece is being machined; and a means for reducing the component of the cutting force.
A first embodiment of the apparatus for mitigating a detrimental effect of a thermomechanical load in a machined surface of a hard metal workpiece, the thermomechanical load being exerted on a surface of the workpiece by a hard cutting tool machining the workpiece, thereby forming the machined surface, includes a means for cooling the machined surface by at least one stream of a coolant having an initial temperature In a range of about −250° C. to about +25° C. In one variation of this embodiment, the stream contains at least one inert, water-free coolant. In another variation, the at least one stream contains a cryogenic fluid or at least one ice particle having a temperature less than about −75° C.
A second embodiment of the apparatus for mitigating a detrimental effect of a thermomechanical load in the machined surface of a hard metal workpiece, the thermomechanical load being exerted on a surface of the workpiece by a hard cutting tool machining the workpiece, thereby forming the machined surface, wherein at least a portion of the thermomechanical load Is a component of the cutting force, the component being applied in a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece, includes: a means for cooling the machined surface by at least one stream containing at least one inert, water-free coolant having an initial temperature in a range of about −250° C. to about +25° C.; a means for cooling the cutting tool simultaneously by at least another stream containing at least one inert, water-free coolant; and a means for reducing the component of the cutting force.
Another aspect of the invention is an apparatus for machining a hard metal workpiece. There are several embodiments of the apparatus for machining.
A first embodiment of the apparatus for machining a hard metal workpiece, whereby a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of the workpiece is reduced, the workpiece being machined by a hard cutting tool initially having a first temperature prior to contacting the surface of the workpiece, the hard cutting tool exerting a thermomechanical load on a surface of the workpiece, includes a means for cooling the cutting tool to a second temperature lower than the first temperature before the cutting tool contacts the surface of the workpiece or while the workpiece Is being machined.
A second embodiment of the apparatus for machining a hard metal workpiece, whereby a detrimental effect of a thermomechanical load is mitigated in a machined surface of the workpiece, the thermomechanical load being exerted on a surface of the workpiece by a hard cutting tool forming the machined surface of the workpiece, includes a means for cooling the machined surface by a stream of a fluid having an initial temperature in a range of about −250° C. to about +25° C.
A third embodiment of the apparatus for machining a hard metal workpiece, whereby a thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer on an as-machined surface of the workpiece is reduced, the workpiece being machined by a hard cutting tool exerting a thermomechanical load on a surface of the workpiece, at least a portion of the thermomechanical load being a component of a cutting force, the component being applied In a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece, includes a means for reducing the component of the cutting force.
In a fourth embodiment, which is similar to the first embodiment, at least a portion of the thermomechanical load is a component of a cutting force, the component being applied In a direction normal to the surface of the workpiece. The fourth embodiment includes a means for reducing the component of the cutting force.
The fifth embodiment of the apparatus for machining is similar to the second embodiment, but includes a means for simultaneously cooling the cutting tool with at least one other stream of the fluid, the means for cooling being means for spraying the streams of the fluid.
A sixth embodiment of the apparatus for machining Is similar to the third embodiment, but includes a means for spraying the machined surface with at least one stream of a fluid having an initial temperature in a range of about −250° C. to about +25° C.
The seventh embodiment of the apparatus for machining Is similar to the sixth embodiment, but includes a means for spraying at least one other stream of the fluid simultaneously on the cutting tool.
Another aspect of the invention is a workpiece machined by an apparatus for machining as in any of the aforesaid embodiments and characterized by an improved surface or an improved property.
The invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention involves machining hard metallic workpieces with hard cutting tools using a method which reduces the thickness of, or eliminates, thermomechanically-affected layers, including but not limited to white layer, and allows cutting at higher speeds without an excessive white layer using CBN tool materials, as well as less expensive Al2O3, carbide, cermet, or other hard tool materials. As used hereinafter, the term “white layer” refers to all types of “thermomechanically-affected layers,” including but not limited to those associated with surface tensile stresses (e.g., reduced fatigue-resistance, lower fracture toughness, and/or reduced wear resistance).
According to the present invention, the thermomechanical load exerted by the cutting tool at the machined surface is reduced using one or a combination of the three techniques (A, B, C) discussed below.
The temperature of the tool cooling jet may vary between +25° C. and −250° C., with the lower, cryogenic jet temperatures preferred. The tool cooled with such a jet makes the surface of a machined part colder. In addition, as observed during hard machining tests, in contrast to conventional machining technology teachings, the use of inert and water-free cooling jets enhances the life of Al2O3, CBN and other, hard cutting tools and, consequently, allows the use of sharper cutting edges which generate lower cutting forces and thinner white layers.
Based on observations, it appears that cooling of the as-machined workpiece surface reduces the depth of heat penetration into machined material and, consequently, the extent of undesired material transformations. The surface-cooling jet of technique B may be separate from the tool-cooling jet of technique A; or just a single jet can be aimed in such a way that it cools both the tool and the surface simultaneously. Persons skilled in the art will recognize that multiple cooling jets or sprays of technique A and technique B could be used according to the present invention.
As observed during tests, the cutting force component normal to the as-machined workpiece surface appears to be a significant source of heat flux entering the surface and generating white layer. In the case of the most frequently practiced OD-hardturning operations, where the normal force is the radial force, a more positive tool inclination angle results in a reduced thermomechanical load entering the surface. In the case of orthogonal cutting, where the normal force is the feed force, a more positive rake angle will be more important. In the most generic cutting case, both the inclination angle and the rake angle are made more positive than the conventional, negative values that are used in current hard machining operations. Since the life of hard cutting tools scales inversely with the positive inclination and rake angle, the increase in the value of these angles is most advantageous if practiced in combination with technique A, which also enhances tool life during hard machining.
Based on SEM examinations carried out on a popular bearing steel grade, AISI 52100 (1 wt % C and 1.5 wt % Cr), hardened to 61 Rockwell on scale C and hard machined, the white layer (WL) is a thin band of poorly etching material with broadly dispersed, spherical carbides. The underlying dark layer (DL) is thicker than the white layer, and contains more and bigger carbide particles, as well as microfeatures suggesting martensitic needles and latches. The thermomechanically-affected layer Includes both the white layer (WL) and the dark layer (DL) but also extends even deeper into the base metal and cannot be measured using simple microscopic methods. Consequently, the evaluation of the thickness of a thermomechanically-affected layer is usually based on (1) a microscopic measurement of the well contrasting white layer (WL), combined with (2) additional measurements of the mechanical properties of the material below the as-machined surface, e.g., residual stress and microhardness measurements.
As
The increased inclination and/or rake angles may produce tensile stresses around the cutting edges of typically brittle tools used in hard machining. Such tensile stresses may lead to premature tool failures in the case of the conventional technology that teaches dry cutting conditions. As observed, the failures are less frequent and tool life is extended when at least one cooling jet or spray is aimed at the rake of the cutting tool during hard machining, and the cooling fluid used is inert, water-free, and preferably cryogenic. (The term “inert” means that the cooling fluid does not react with the hard metal and does not degrade the mechanical properties of the hard metal or the hard cutting tool.)
The present invention minimizes detrimental white layer and other thermomechanically-affected layers In an as-machined workpiece surface by reducing the thermomechanical load exerted by the cutting tool on the workpiece material surface during hard machining. As discussed above, the present invention includes three techniques (A, B, C) which may be used separately or in combination (AB, AC, BC, ABC).
Although illustrated and described herein with reference to certain specific embodiments, the present invention is nevertheless not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10/066830 | Feb 2002 | US | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/01682 | 1/21/2003 | WO | 00 | 9/17/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/066916 | 8/14/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2635399 | West, Jr. | Apr 1953 | A |
2641047 | Jackman et al. | Jun 1953 | A |
3077802 | Philip | Feb 1963 | A |
3433028 | Klee | Mar 1969 | A |
3571877 | Zerkle | Mar 1971 | A |
3650337 | Andrews et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3696627 | Longsworth | Oct 1972 | A |
3751780 | Villalobos | Aug 1973 | A |
3889520 | Stoferle et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3900975 | Lightstone et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3971114 | Dudley | Jul 1976 | A |
3979981 | Lightstone et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4083220 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4296610 | Davis | Oct 1981 | A |
4336689 | Davis | Jun 1982 | A |
4404827 | Van den Sype | Sep 1983 | A |
4510760 | Wieland | Apr 1985 | A |
4547470 | Tanase et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4666665 | Hornsby et al. | May 1987 | A |
4715187 | Stearns | Dec 1987 | A |
4716738 | Tatge et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4788842 | Kopp et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4829859 | Yankoff | May 1989 | A |
4829869 | Katada et al. | May 1989 | A |
4844047 | Brehm et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4848198 | Royal et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
5025547 | Sheu et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5103701 | Lundin et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5123250 | Maric | Jun 1992 | A |
5237894 | Lindeke | Aug 1993 | A |
5265505 | Frechette | Nov 1993 | A |
5392608 | Lee | Feb 1995 | A |
5432132 | Dasgupta et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5449647 | Brandt | Sep 1995 | A |
5477691 | White | Dec 1995 | A |
5509335 | Emerson | Apr 1996 | A |
5592863 | Jaskowiak et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597272 | Moriguchi | Jan 1997 | A |
5738281 | Zurecki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761941 | Matsui et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761974 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5762381 | Vogel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799553 | Billatos | Sep 1998 | A |
5862833 | Perez | Jan 1999 | A |
5878496 | Liu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901623 | Hong | May 1999 | A |
6007909 | Rolander et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010283 | Henrich et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017172 | Ukegawa et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6053669 | Lagerberg | Apr 2000 | A |
6105374 | Kamody | Aug 2000 | A |
6145322 | Odashima | Nov 2000 | A |
6179692 | Hara | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200198 | Ukai et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202525 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6305183 | Mukai et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330818 | Jain | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332385 | Kautto et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6360577 | Austin | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6454877 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6513336 | Zureck et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6564682 | Zurecki et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6622570 | Prevey, III | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6652200 | Kraemer | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658907 | Inoue et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666061 | Heimann | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675622 | Plicht et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6706324 | Chandrasekar et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6815362 | Wong et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6874344 | Junius et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
20020040905 | Groll | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020150496 | Chandrasekar et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174528 | Prevey, III | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020189413 | Zurecki et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030110781 | Zurecki et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030145694 | Zurecki et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040043626 | Chou San et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040154443 | Zurecki et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040232258 | Cerv et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234350 | Jager et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237542 | Zurecki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050011201 | Zurecki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050016337 | Zurecki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050211029 | Zurecki et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060053987 | Ghosh et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070084263 | Zurecki | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070175255 | Pawelski et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
87102713 | Sep 1987 | CN |
196 00 172 | Dec 1997 | DE |
43 26 517 | Jun 1998 | DE |
197 30 539 | Apr 1999 | DE |
0 842 722 | May 1998 | EP |
0 711 663 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1142669 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1 580 284 | Sep 2005 | EP |
0 945 222 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1 637 257 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2 724 337 | Mar 1996 | FR |
2804492 | Aug 2001 | FR |
2804492 | Aug 2001 | FR |
32-8397 | Sep 1957 | JP |
62-10105 | Jan 1987 | JP |
63-62637 | Dec 1988 | JP |
5-508114 | Nov 1993 | JP |
06-031502 | Feb 1994 | JP |
6330077 | Nov 1994 | JP |
9-300172 | Nov 1997 | JP |
09-300172 | Nov 1997 | JP |
11-156669 | Jun 1999 | JP |
11-320328 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000024801 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-65291 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2000-296438 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000343427 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2002-59336 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-059336 | Feb 2002 | JP |
9216464 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9217315 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9708486 | Mar 1997 | WO |
9810893 | Mar 1998 | WO |
9960079 | Nov 1999 | WO |
02096598 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03002277 | Jan 2003 | WO |
03022517 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03066916 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2005120739 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050016337 A1 | Jan 2005 | US |