The invention relates to an apparatus and a method for measuring flowable substance and an arrangement and a method for controlling solid content of the flowable substance.
One of the biggest problems in measurement of sewage sludge or any other flowable substance is a dirt build-up on the sensor elements which are in contact with the flowable substance. The effect of the layered dirt on the microwave sensor elements may cause an error of up to tens of percentages to a measurement result. Such a huge error may lead to wrong control of a process, excessive or imbalanced use of chemical agents or other input material and also economic losses. Thus, there is a need for improvement in the microwave measurement of flowable substance.
An object of the present invention is to provide improvement to the prior art. The objects of the invention are achieved by apparatus of the independent claim 1.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an independent control arrangement claim 7.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an independent measurement method claim 10.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an independent control method claim 11.
The preferred embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the dependent claims.
The invention provides advantages. The effect of dirt layers on the sensor elements in contact with the flowable substance can be reduced or eliminated.
In the following the invention will be described in greater detail by means of preferred embodiments with reference to the attached drawings, in which
The following embodiments are only examples. Although the specification may refer to “an” embodiment in several locations, this does not necessarily mean that each such reference is to the same embodiment(s), or that the feature only applies to a single embodiment. Single features of different embodiments may also be combined to provide other embodiments. Furthermore, words “comprising” and “including” should be understood as not limiting the described embodiments to consist of only those features that have been mentioned and such embodiments may contain also features/structures that have not been specifically mentioned.
It should be noted that while Figures illustrate various embodiments, they are simplified diagrams that only show some structures and/or functional entities. The connections shown in these Figures may refer to logical or physical connections. Interfaces between the various elements may be implemented with suitable interface technologies. It is apparent to a person skilled in the art that the described apparatuses may also comprise other functions and structures. Therefore, they need not be discussed in more detail here. Although separate single entities have been depicted, different parts may be implemented in one or more physical or logical entities.
The flowable substance 108 builds up dirt layers 114, 116, 118 of solid material on the microwave sensor elements 100 to 104. The dirt layers of sewage sludge may comprise various kinds of solid material, for example polymer. In pulp the dirt layers may be made of any solid material mixed in the pulp such as fibers, fillers, retention agents, resin, colouring agent, for example. The dirt layers have a different relative dielectric constant from that of water which is the dominating medium in pulp slurry and sewage sludge. The unknown thickness of dirt layer 114, 116, 118 with known or unknown dielectric constant deteriorates the accuracy of a measurement based on a time of flight of a microwave signal between sensor elements. The time of flight may be measured by determining a phase of the microwave signal, by measuring the actual flight time or any other method to determine microwave signal delay.
The sensor elements 100 to 104 operate as at least two transmitter-receiver pairs 110, 112. In the example of
The measurement configuration examples of which are shown in
Analyse now the example of
deff1=(db−d1−d3)*√{square root over (εm)}+d1*√{square root over (εd)}+d3*√{square root over (εd)},
where d1 and d3 are the thicknesses of the dirt layers on the sensor elements 100 and 102, εm is the relative dielectric constant of the flowable substance 108, which is typically water dominant liquid-like flowing substance, and εd the relative dielectric constant of the dirt layers. The effective distance means the distance of the microwave signal travelling with the speed of light in vacuum in the measured time of flight.
The effective distance deff2 between the sensor element 100 and the sensor element 104 may be expressed as:
deff2=(da−d1−d2)*√{square root over (εm)}+d1*√{square root over (εd)}+d2*√{square root over (εd)}.
where d2 is the thickness of the dirt layer on the sensor element 104. The difference of effective distances of deff1 and deff2 may be expressed as:
Δdeff=(da−db+d3−d2)*√{square root over (εm)}+(d2−d3)*√{square root over (εd)}.
If the dirt layer d2118 has the same thickness as the dirt layer d3116, the difference of effective distances may be expressed as:
Δdeff=(da−db)*√{square root over (εm)},
which has no dependence from the dirt layers. The mathematics for
Analyse now the example of
deff1=(da−d1−d2)*√{square root over (εm)}+d1*√{square root over (εd)}+d2*√{square root over (εd)},
where εm is the relative dielectric constant of layer, which is typically water dominant liquid-like flowing substance, for example, and εd the relative dielectric constant of the dirt layers.
The effective distance means the distance of the microwave signal travelling with the speed of light in vacuum in the measured time of flight. That is, the value of the relative dielectric constant makes the effective distance longer than the actual distance because it takes more time to propagate a distance in material than to travel the same distance in vacuum. The effective distance corresponds to a product of the actual distance and a square root of the relative dielectric constant. The time of flight of a microwave signal may be determined to be the effective distance divided by the speed of light in vacuum. The time of flight depends on a consistency or solid content of the flowable substance, for example.
The effective distance deff2 between the sensor element 100′ and the sensor element 102 may be expressed as:
deff2=(db−d4−d3)*√{square root over (εm)}+d4*√{square root over (εd)}+d3*√{square root over (εd)}.
where d4 is the thickness of the dirt layer 114′ on the sensor element 100′.
The difference of effective distances of deff1 and deff2 may be expressed as:
Δdeff=(da−db)*√{square root over (εm)}+(d3−d1)*√{square root over (εm)}+(d3−d2)*√{square root over (εm)}+(d4−d1)*√{square root over (εm)}+(d4−d2)*√{square root over (εm)}+[(d1−d3)*√{square root over (εd)}+(d1−d4)*√{square root over (εd)}+(d2−d3)*√{square root over (εd)}+(d2−d4)*√{square root over (εd)}].
If all dirt layers have the same thickness and the same relative dielectric constant, the difference of effective distances becomes Δdeff=(da−db)*√{square root over (εm)}, which independent from the dirt layers. In this example, the distance da is different from the distance db, i.e. the distance da is not the same as distance db, da≠db.
Analyse now the example of
deff1=(da−d1−d3)*√{square root over (εm)}+d1*√{square root over (εd)}+d3*√{square root over (εd)},
where εm is the relative dielectric constant of layer, which is typically water dominant liquid-like flowing substance, and εd the relative dielectric constant of the dirt layers. The effective distance means the distance of the microwave signal travelling with the speed of light in vacuum in the measured time of flight.
The effective distance deff2 between the sensor element 100 and the sensor element 104 may be expressed as:
deff2=(db−d1−d2)*√{square root over (εm)}+d1*√{square root over (εd)}+d2*√{square root over (εd)}.
The effective distance deff3 between the sensor element 100 and the sensor element 100′ may be expressed as:
deff3=(dd−d1−d4)*√{square root over (εm)}+d1*√{square root over (εd)}+d4*√{square root over (εd)}.
The effective distance deff4 between the sensor element 100′ and the sensor element 102 may be expressed as:
deff4=(de−d3−d4)*√{square root over (εm)}+d3*√{square root over (εd)}+d4*√{square root over (εd)}.
The effective distance deff5 between the sensor element 104 and the sensor element 102 may be expressed as:
deff5=(dc−d2−d3)*√{square root over (εm)}+d2*√{square root over (εd)}+d3*√{square root over (εd)}.
The effective distance deff6 between the sensor element 104 and the sensor element 100′ may be expressed as:
deff6=(df−d2−d4)*√{square root over (εm)}+d2*√{square root over (εd)}+d4*√{square root over (εd)}.
Now all dirt layers d1, d2, d3 and d4 (114, 114′, 116, 118) can be cancelled out without any assumption of their thickness, and the difference of effective distances Δdeff becomes Δdeff=(da−db)*√{square root over (εm)}, which independent from the dirt layers. Actually, the difference of effective distances Δdeff may be formed between any transmitter-receiver pair, i.e. over any distances da, db, dc, de and df. Mathematically this may be expressed as Δdeff=(dx−dy)*√{square root over (εm)}, where x may be a, b, c, e or f, y may be a, b, c, e or f, and x may not be the same as y.
The effective distance deff corresponds to the time of flight. The longer the time of flight, the longer the effective distance and vice versa. In a similar manner, the longer the time of flight, the larger the phase-shift of the microwave signal. The difference of the effective distance behaves in a corresponding manner, because the measurement is a function of the relative dielectric constant εm of the flowable substance 108 in the chamber 106.
In an embodiment, the apparatus may comprise a signal processing unit 120 which receives signals from the at least two transmitter-receiver pairs 110, 112. The signals may be the same as received by the receiving sensor elements or signals pre-processed in the receiving sensor elements. Each signal carries information about a time of flight through a path. The signal processing unit 120 then forms a value of a desired property of the flowable substance 108 on the basis of the pieces of information about the time of flights. The value v of the desired property may be a function of the difference of effective distances Δdeff as follows: v=f(Δdeff). Several measurement results may be combined by averaging.
In an embodiment, the signal processing unit 120 may form the value of the desired property of the flowable substance on the basis of differences between the pieces of information about the time of flights received from the at least two transmitter-receiver pairs.
In an embodiment, at least one transmitting sensor element may transmit a microwave signal to at least two receiving sensor elements which are physically separate from the at least one transmitting sensor element. The angle of transmission may be wide such as 90°, for example. In this manner, the same microwave signal may be received by at least two receiving sensor elements.
In an embodiment, the apparatus may comprises N microwave sensor elements 100, 100′, 102, 104 which operate as N separate transmitter-receiver pairs 110, 112, 200, 202, 300, 302, 304, 400, 402, 404, 406, 408, 410, where N is at least two.
In an embodiment, at least two different pairs may have physically separate receiving sensors. In this case, the same transmitting sensor element may transmit to at least two separate receiving sensor elements, for example. Pairs 110, 112 in
In an embodiment, a measuring chamber 106, which may have at least almost a circular circumference, a transmitting element of a transmitter-receiver pair may transmit in a direction of a chord towards a receiving element which is the transmitting element's pair.
In an embodiment, a measuring chamber 106, which may have a at least almost circular circumference, a transmitting element of a transmitter-receiver pair may transmit in a direction of a diameter towards a receiving element which is the transmitting element's pair.
The transmitting element 100 and the receiving element 102 may be directed to each other at least approximately in a similar manner as the transmitting element 100 and the receiving element 104. That is, their deviation from a direction, which is normal to the surface of the transmitting element 100, has the same absolute value (the magnitude of the deviation may be the same but the angles may have opposite signs). In this manner, the length through both the dirt layer on the transmission element 100 and the dirt layer on the receiving element 102 is the same as the length through both the dirt layer on the transmitting element 100 and the dirt layer on the receiving element 104. The effect could be achieved by tilting the transmitting and receiving elements 100, 102, 104 in such positions irrespective of their location in the measurement chamber 106.
In an embodiment, the distance in the direction of transmission of the microwave radiation between the sensor elements 100, 102, 104 is shorter than a double distance between any of the sensor elements 100, 102, 104 and the wall of the chamber 106. This kind of configuration reduces the effects of reflection from the walls of the chamber 106. Note that the microwave radiation is mainly transmitted in direction where the wall reflection is in the direction away from the sensor in
If the electric field is polarized perpendicular to the walls of the chamber 106, the electric field is not zero on the electrically conduction walls of the chamber 106. In this case, the dirt layer on the walls of chamber 106 has an effect on the measurement performed with the microwave radiation. The frequency of the microwave radiation may be in the range of 1 GHz to 5 GHz. In an embodiment, the frequency is one of the following: 2 GHz, 3 GHz or 4 GHz within an inaccuracy of 1 GHz. In any case, the frequency of the microwave radiation may be selected to be as high as possible to avoid or to reduce the effects of conductance.
In an embodiment, the controller 900 controls feed of at least one chemical which causes and/or activates sedimentation in the flowable substance. In this example, the flowable substance may be sewage sludge. Each chemical may come from a container 902 to 904 the output of which to the chamber 106 and into the flowable substance 108 is controlled by the controller 900. In an embodiment, an increase of the feed of the at least one chemical to the flowable substance 108 by the controller 900 may be proportional to a measured property of the flowable substance 108. That is, if the solid content is high in the flowable substance 108, the higher the amount of the at least one chemical which is fed to the flowable substance 108 and vice versa.
At least one chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) agent may be added to the sewage sludge in a controlled manner. A CEPT agent may comprise metal salts and/or polymers. The CEPT agent causes the suspended particles in the flowable substance 108 to aggregate together and form flocs or clots which makes the water treatment easier and faster in a water treatment plant.
In an embodiment, the controller 900 controls the feed of solid particles which have a different relative dielectric constant than the medium of the flowable substance 108 to the chamber 106. For example the percentage of fibers or other solid particles may be increased or decreased in suspension of pulp in this manner.
In an embodiment, the controller 900 controls the amount of the at least one substance fed to the chamber in a batch process. In an embodiment, the controller 900 controls the amount of the at least one substance fed to the chamber in a time unit in a continuous process.
In an embodiment shown in
The at least one computer program may be placed on a computer program distribution means for the distribution thereof. The computer program distribution means is readable by at least one data processing device for encoding the computer program commands and carrying out the actions.
The distribution medium, in turn, may be a medium readable by a data processing device, a program storage medium, a memory readable by a data processing device, a software distribution package readable by a data processing device, a signal readable by a data processing device, or a compressed software package readable by a data processing device. In some cases the distribution medium may also include a telecommunication signal readable by a data processing device.
All in all, the solution may be implemented as one or more integrated circuits, such as application-specific integrated circuits ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit). Other hardware embodiments are also feasible, such as a circuit built of separate logic components. A hybrid of these different implementations is also feasible. When selecting the method of implementation, a person skilled in the art will consider the requirements set for the size and power consumption of the apparatus, the necessary processing capacity, production costs, and production volumes, for example.
The solution with many embodiments presented in this document may be applied in a water treatment plant, a paper mill, production of pulp, pharmaceutical industry or the like. The solution described in this application reduces or eliminates an error in a measurement result caused by the dirt layer on the sensor elements. This provides a more accurate result of the measured property which may be used in the process control. The error in a consistency measurement because of the dirt build-up may be particularly high in low consistencies, for example, but the error exists also in high consistencies. The error may be as high as 50%, for example.
It will be obvious to a person skilled in the art that, as the technology advances, the inventive concept can be implemented in various ways. The invention and its embodiments are not limited to the examples described above but may vary within the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20145983 | Nov 2014 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2015/050777 | 11/10/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/075367 | 5/19/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4888547 | McGinn | Dec 1989 | A |
5103181 | Gaisford | Apr 1992 | A |
5386719 | Marrelli | Feb 1995 | A |
5502393 | Yamaguchi | Mar 1996 | A |
5581191 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1996 | A |
5610527 | Yamaguchi | Mar 1997 | A |
5767409 | Yamaguchi | Jun 1998 | A |
5969254 | Yamaguchi | Oct 1999 | A |
6260406 | Shimokawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268736 | Hirai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6794865 | Astley | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7164123 | Morris | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7589529 | White | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7648836 | Scott | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7683613 | Freedman | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7927875 | Scott | Apr 2011 | B1 |
9970804 | Abou Khousa | May 2018 | B2 |
20040229376 | Beauducel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060052963 | Shkarlet | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060164085 | Morris | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070279073 | Wee | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20110267074 | Xie | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120143529 | Dam | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120265454 | Rudd | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20150300936 | Edward | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150355110 | Sappok | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160054161 | Abou Khousa | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10210511 | Nov 2005 | DE |
0926487 | Jun 1999 | EP |
2001-255284 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-350364 | Dec 2002 | JP |
9105243 | Apr 1991 | WO |
9853306 | Nov 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dec. 23, 2015 Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/FI2015/050777. |
Jul. 6, 2015 Search Report issued in Finnish Patent Application No. 20145983. |
Dec. 23, 2015 Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/FI2015/050777. |
Sep. 5, 2017 Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 15859228.7. |
Saber, Nasser et al. “A Feasibility Study on the Application of Microwaves for Online Biofilm Monitoring in the Pipelines.” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 111-112, pp. 99-105, Nov. 1, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170343484 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |