The invention relates generally to the field of imaging systems, and more particularly to the imaging of objects. More specifically, the invention relates to an apparatus and method that enable analytical imaging of objects (for example, small animals and tissue) in differing modes, including bright-field, dark-field (e.g., luminescence and fluorescence), and x-ray and radioactive isotopes.
Electronic imaging systems are well known for enabling molecular imaging. An exemplary electronic imaging system (shown in
Applicants have recognized a need for an apparatus and method for enabling analytical imaging of an object in differing modes.
An object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method for enabling analytical imaging of an object.
Another object of the present invention is to provide such an apparatus and method for enabling analytical imaging of an object in differing modes.
These objects are given only by way of illustrative example, and such objects may be exemplary of one or more embodiments of the invention. Other desirable objectives and advantages inherently achieved by the disclosed invention may occur or become apparent to those skilled in the art. The invention is defined by the appended claims.
One embodiment of the invention concerns an imaging system for imaging an immobilized object. The system includes a support member adapted to receive the object in an immobilized state, the support member including a frame supporting an optically clear support element for the object. An imaging unit is included for imaging the immobilized object in a first imaging mode to capture a first image, the first imaging mode being selected from the group consisting of: x-ray mode and radio isotope mode; and for imaging the immobilized object in a second imaging mode that uses light from the immobilized object, different from the first imaging mode, to capture a second image, the second imaging mode being selected from the group consisting of: bright-field mode, fluorescence mode, and luminescence mode. A movable phosphor plate is included to transduce ionizing radiation to visible light. The phosphor plate is mounted to be moved, without moving the immobilized object and the support member, between a first position proximate the support member for and during capture of the first image and a second position not proximate the support member during capture of the second image. A layer on the phosphor plate protects a surface of the phosphor plate facing the support element of the support member during movement of the phosphor plate between the first and second positions. A capture system is included for capturing either the first image or the second image of the object.
Another embodiment of the invention also concerns an imaging system for imaging an immobilized object. A support member is adapted to receive the object in an immobilized state. An imaging unit is included for imaging the immobilized object in a first imaging mode to capture a first image, the first imaging mode being selected from the group consisting of: x-ray imaging mode and isotope imaging mode; and for imaging the immobilized object in a second imaging mode that uses light from the object to capture a second image, the second imaging mode being selected from the group consisting of: bright-field imaging mode and dark-field imaging mode. A movable phosphor plate is mounted to be disposed in a first position proximate the support member when capturing the first image. A moving unit is provided for removing the phosphor plate from the first position proximate the support member, after capturing the first image and without moving the immobilized object and the support member, and for moving the phosphor plate to a second position not proximate the support member prior to capturing the second image. A capture system is provided for capturing either the first image or the second image of the object, the capture system comprising a camera, a first mirror on a first side of the support member for reflecting to the camera light from the object or from the phosphor plate to capture the first and second images; and a second mirror on a second, opposite side of the support member for reflecting to the camera light to capture a third image from an opposite side of the object than that of the second image.
Yet another embodiment of the invention concerns a method of imaging an immobilized object. The method includes steps of providing a support member adapted to receive the object in an immobilized state; placing the object on the support member in an immobilized state; providing a phosphor plate adapted to be disposed proximate the support member when capturing a first image; disposing the phosphor plate proximate the support member; imaging the immobilized object in a first imaging mode to capture the first image, the first imaging mode being selected from the group consisting of: x-ray mode and radio isotope mode; removing the phosphor plate from proximate the support member, after capturing the first image and without moving the immobilized object and the support member; with the phosphor plate removed from proximate the support member, imaging the immobilized object in a second imaging mode that uses light from the object to capture a second image, the second imaging mode being selected from the group consisting of bright-field mode and dark-field mode; and imaging the immobilized object in the second imaging mode, but from a side of the object opposite that used when capturing the second image, to capture a third image.
A further embodiment of the invention also concerns a method of imaging an immobilized object. The method includes steps of providing a support member adapted to receive the object in an immobilized state; placing the object on the support member in an immobilized state; providing a phosphor plate movable relative to the support member, without moving the immobilized object and the support member, between a first position wherein the phosphor plate is in optical registration with the support member and a second position wherein the phosphor plate is not in optical registration with the support member; disposing the phosphor plate in the first position; capturing a first, x-ray image or a first, radio isotopic image of the immobilized object when the phosphor plate is disposed in the first position; moving the phosphor plate to the second position; using light from the object, capturing a second, dark-field image or a second, bright-field image of the immobilized object when the phosphor plate is disposed in the second position; and using light from the object, capturing a third, dark-field image or a third, bright-field image of the immobilized object from a side of the object opposite that used during capture of the second, dark-field image or the second, bright-field image.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of the embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The elements of the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other.
The following is a detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, reference being made to the drawings in which the same reference numerals identify the same elements of structure in each of the several figures.
Applicants have recognized that the complex pharmaceutical analyses of small objects/subjects (e.g., small animal and tissue) images are particularly enhanced by using different in-vivo imaging modalities. Using the known/current practices of bright-field, dark-field and radiographic imaging for the analysis of small objects/subjects (such as a mouse) can be expensive and may not provide the precision of co-registered images that is desired.
Using the apparatus and method of the present invention, precisely co-registered fluorescent, luminescent and/or isotopic probes within an object (e.g., a live animal and tissue) can be localized and multiple images can be accurately overlaid onto the simple bright-field reflected image or anatomical x-ray of the same animal within minutes of animal immobilization.
The present invention uses the same imaging system to capture differing modes of imaging, thereby enabling/simplifying multi-modal imaging. In addition, the relative movement of probes can be kinetically resolved over the time period that the animal is effectively immobilized (which can be tens of minutes). Alternatively, the same animal may be subject to repeated complete image analysis over a period of days/weeks required to assure completion of a pharmaceutical study, with the assurance that the precise anatomical frame of reference (particularly, the x-ray) may be readily reproduced upon repositioning the object animal. The method of the present invention can be applied to other objects and/or complex systems subject to simple planar imaging methodologies.
More particularly, using the imaging system of the present invention, an immobilized object can be imaged in several imaging modes without changing/moving the immobilized object. These acquired multi-modal images can then be merged to provide one or more co-registered images for analysis.
Imaging modes supported by the apparatus/method of the present invention include: x-ray imaging, bright-field imaging, dark-field imaging (including luminescence imaging, fluorescence imaging) and radioactive isotope imaging. Images acquired in these modes can be merged in various combinations for analysis. For example, an x-ray image of the object can be merged with a near IR fluorescence image of the object to provide a new image for analysis.
The apparatus of the present invention is now described with reference to
Imaging system 100 includes light source 12, optical compartment 14, a lens/camera system 18, and communication/computer control system 20 which can include a display device, for example, a computer monitor 22. Camera/lens system 18 can include an emission filter wheel for fluorescent imaging. Light source 12 can include an excitation filter selector for fluorescent excitation or bright field color imaging.
As best shown in
Sample object stage 104 is disposed within a sample environment 108, which allows access to the object being imaged. Preferably, sample environment 108 is light-tight and fitted with light-locked gas ports (not illustrated) for environmental control. Environmental control enables practical x-ray contrast below 8 Kev (air absorption) and aids in life support for biological specimens. Such environmental control might be desirable for controlled x-ray imaging or for support of particular specimens.
Imaging system 100 can include an access means/member 110 to provide convenient, safe and light-tight access to sample environment 108, such as a door, opening, labyrinth, and the like. Additionally, sample environment 108 is preferably adapted to provide atmospheric control for sample maintenance or soft x-ray transmission (e.g., temperature/humidity/alternative gases and the like).
Imaging system 100 can be a unitary system. Alternatively, imaging system 100 can be a modular unit adapted to be used/mated with electronic imaging system such as electronic imaging system 10.
Continuing with regard to
Phosphor plate 125 is mounted for motion toward and away from sample object stage 104. While those skilled in the art might recognize other configurations, in a preferred embodiment, phosphor plate 125 is mounted for translation to provide slidable motion (in the direction of arrow A in
Phosphor layer 130 functions to transduce ionizing radiation to visible light that can be practically managed by lens and camera system 18 (such as a CCD camera). Phosphor layer 130 can have a thickness ranging from about 0.01 mm to about 0.1 mm, depending upon the application (i.e., soft x-ray, gamma-ray or fast electron imaging). On the underside of phosphor layer 130, as illustrated, an optical layer 132 is provided for conditioning emitted light from phosphor layer 130. Optical layer 132 can have a thickness in the range of less than about 0.001 mm. Particular information about phosphor layer 130 and optical layer 132 are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,444,988 (Vizard), commonly assigned and incorporated herein by reference. A supporting glass plate 134 is provided. Glass plate 134 is spaced at a suitable mechanical clearance from an optical platen 126, for example, by an air gap/void 136. In the preferred embodiment, the surfaces of clear optical media (e.g., a lower surface of glass plate 134 and both surfaces of optical platen 126) are provided with an anti-reflective coating to minimize reflections that may confuse the image of the object.
Referring now to
As indicated above, system 100 can be configured in several modes, including: x-ray imaging, bright-field imaging, dark-field imaging (including luminescence imaging, fluorescence imaging) and radioactive isotope imaging. To configure system 100 for x-ray imaging or isotope imaging, phosphor plate 125 is moved to position P1 in optical registration with sample object stage 104 (as shown in
For the purpose of optical imaging, the object surface is defined by a refractive boundary (e.g., the skin of an animal) that delineates the interior of the object (usually a heterogeneous, turbid media of higher index of refraction) and air. Light emanating from within an object (e.g., luminescent or transmitted) projects to the surface from which it scatters, defining the light that may be productively managed to create an image of the object. Conversely, light may be provided from beneath optical platen 126 and scattered from the object surface, thereby providing reflective light for imaging the same object.
For optical imaging, the definition of the object boundary may be moderated by matching the refractive index of the object boundary to support sheet 122 by introducing an index-matching fluid (e.g., water). The depth to which good focus can be achieved in optical imaging is dependent on minimizing the surface scatter of the object, and methods such as index matching and increasing wavelength (e.g., near-infrared, NIR imaging) are well known in the art.
The emitted sample light can arise from luminescence, fluorescence or reflection, and the focal plane of the lens can be adjusted to the elevation of object surface. Alternatively, the “light” can be ionizing radiation passing through or emitted from the object, or passing into the phosphor and forming an image. Soft x-rays, consistent with thin objects or small animals, project an image through the diffusive phosphor onto the optical boundary, adding the depth of the (more than about 0.02 mm) to the depth of focus. More significant is the focal distance contributed by the phosphor support plate 134, which may be fractional millimeters, depending upon the thickness and index of the glass or plastic. The fractional-millimeter elevation of the best focal plane contributed by the phosphor support can provide a better coincidence between the phosphor focal plane and the focal plane used for optical imaging. For near infrared (NIR) optical imaging, the preferred/best focal plane may be located at millimeter depths into a nominally turbid object. The phosphor support plate 134 can be thicker to maximize the coincidence of the optical and phosphor imaging planes. Those skilled in the art will recognize how to tune the materials of the present invention to optimally co-locate the preferred optical and phosphor imaging planes. Currently described materials may be practically assembled to assure multi-modal focal plane co-location to accommodate the demands of a fast lens system.
Appropriately fast lens systems for dark-field and x-ray imaging applications will likely have sub-millimeter focal depths, necessitating the above considerations. Accordingly, for a particular embodiment, it may be desirable for multiple optical elements to enable the location of a common focal plane shared by differing modes of imaging.
Emitted gamma rays from a thick object (such as 99Tc emission from an animal organ) are distributed over the plane of the phosphor, diffusing the image by millimeters, and an appropriately thick phosphor layer (about 0.1 mm) may be preferred for increased detection efficiency. Consequently, the location of the focal plane at the supporting sheet is not critical to the resolution of the radio isotopic image. Better resolution and more precise planar projection of the emitting isotope can be achieved by gamma-ray collimation. Collimators of millimeter-resolution are available and capable of projecting isotopic location to millimeter resolution at the focal plane of the phosphor in the present invention.
Of particular relevance to the operation of the present invention is the thickness of the layers in the focal plane of the lens. For example, fast lenses, (which are essential elements for the practice of imaging low-light emissions) will have a focal depth of focus of about 0.5 mm for very fast lenses. For good resolution of objects of interest, less than about 0.2 mm of spatial resolution is desirable, and a megapixel CCD camera (cooled) imaging at 100 mm field is suitable. Generally, more resolution is desirable.
Precision registration of the multi-modal image can be accomplished using methods known to those skilled in the art. By placing the object on a thin, stretched optical support that allows phosphor plate 125 to be removed without displacement of the object, co-registered optical imaging is enabled by the same lens/camera system using epi-illumination methodologies at a sufficiently similar focal plane.
Examples are now provided.
It is noted that the first and/or second image can be enhanced using known image processing methods/means prior to be merged together. Alternatively, the merged image can be enhanced using known image processing methods/means. Often, false color is used to distinguish fluorescent signal from gray-scale x-rays in a merged image.
A phosphor plate suitable for use with the apparatus and method of the present invention is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,444,988 (Vizard), commonly assigned and incorporated herein by reference. A phosphor plate as described in Vizard is shown in
The phosphor preferably used in phosphor layers 240 and 260 is Gadolinium Oxysulfide: Terbium whose strong monochromatic line output (544-548 nanometers (NM) is ideal for co-application with interference optics. This phosphor has technical superiority regarding linear dynamic range of output, sufficiently “live” or prompt emission and time reciprocity, and intrascenic dynamic range which exceed other phosphors and capture media. This phosphor layer preferably has a nominal thickness of 10-30 micrometers (μm) at 5-20 grams/square foot (g/ft2) of phosphor coverage, optimally absorbing 10-30 Kev x-rays. Thick phosphor layer 260 has a nominal thickness of 100 μm at 80 g/ft2 of phosphor coverage.
The duplex phosphor layers impart flexibility of usage for which the thick phosphor layer 260 may be removed to enhance the spatial resolution of the image. Thin phosphor layer 240 intimately contacts filter 220, whereas thick phosphor layer 260 may be alternatively placed on thin phosphor layer 240.
Interference filter 220 transmits light at 551 NM and below and reflects light above that wavelength. Filter 220 comprises layers of Zinc Sulfide-Cryolite that exhibits a large reduction in cutoff wavelength with increasing angle of incidence. The filter has a high transmission at 540-551 NM to assure good transmission of 540-548 NM transmission of the GOS phosphor. The filter also has a sharp short-pass cut-off at about 553 NM, that blue shifts at about 0.6 NM per angular degree of incidence to optimize optical gain.
Glass support 210 should be reasonably flat, clear, and free of severe defects. The thickness of support 210 can be 2 millimeters. The opposite side 280 of glass support 210 is coated with an anti-reflective layer (such as Magnesium Fluoride, green optimized) to increase transmittance and reduce optical artifacts to ensure that the large dynamic range of the phosphor emittance is captured.
Advantages of the present invention include: provides anatomical localization of molecular imaging agent signals in small animals, organs, and tissues; provides precise co-registration of anatomical x-ray images with optical molecular and radio isotopic images using one system; promotes improved understanding of imaging agent's biodistribution through combined use of time lapse molecular imaging with x-ray imaging; and allows simple switching between multi-wavelength fluorescence, luminescence, radio-isotopic, and x-ray imaging modalities without moving the object/sample.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to a presently preferred embodiment, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalents thereof are intended to be embraced therein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/763,231 filed Apr. 20, 2010 now abandoned by Feke, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MULTI-MODAL IMAGING, published as US 2010/0220836, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. The above-identified application was itself a continuation-in-part of the following commonly assigned, copending U.S. Patent Applications, each of which is incorporated by reference into this specification: U.S. Ser. No. 11/221,530 filed Sep. 8, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,734,325 by Vizard et al, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MULTI-MODAL IMAGING, published as US 2006/0064000; U.S. Ser. No. 12/196,300 filed Aug. 22, 2008 now abandoned by Harder et al, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MULTI-MODAL IMAGING USING NANOPARTICLE MULTI-MODAL IMAGING PROBES, published as US 2009/0086908; U.S. Ser. No. 12/354,830 filed Jan. 16, 2009 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,050,735 by Feke et al, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MULTI-MODAL IMAGING, published as US 2009/0159805; U.S. Ser. No. 12/381,599 filed Mar. 13, 2009 now abandoned by Feke et al, entitled METHOD FOR REPRODUCING THE SPATIAL ORIENTATION OF AN IMMOBILIZED SUBJECT IN A MULTI-MODAL IMAGING SYSTEM, published as US 2009/0238434; and U.S. Ser. No. 12/475,623 filed Jun. 1, 2009 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,660,631 by Feke et al, entitled TORSIONAL SUPPORT APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CRANIOCAUDAL ROTATION OF ANIMALS, published as US 2010/0022866.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1609703 | Eggert et al. | Dec 1926 | A |
3717764 | Fujimura et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3936644 | Rabatin | Feb 1976 | A |
4028550 | Weiss et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4088894 | Rabatin | May 1978 | A |
4107070 | Everts et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4208470 | Rabatin | Jun 1980 | A |
4232227 | Finkenzeller et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4394737 | Komaki et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4446365 | Ong et al. | May 1984 | A |
4675529 | Kushida | Jun 1987 | A |
4710637 | Luckey et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4829188 | Shinomiya et al. | May 1989 | A |
4870279 | Cueman et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4891527 | Rabatin | Jan 1990 | A |
4898175 | Noguchi | Feb 1990 | A |
5069982 | Zegarski | Dec 1991 | A |
5307804 | Bonnet | May 1994 | A |
5501225 | Wilson | Mar 1996 | A |
5517193 | Allison et al. | May 1996 | A |
5534709 | Yoshimoto et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5650135 | Contag et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663005 | Dooms et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5717791 | Labaere et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730701 | Furukawa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748768 | Sivers et al. | May 1998 | A |
5830629 | Vizard et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6216540 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227704 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229873 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6268613 | Cantu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269177 | Dewaele et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278765 | Berliner | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6346707 | Vizard et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6379044 | Vastenaeken et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6416800 | Weber et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423002 | Hossack | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424750 | Colbeth et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444988 | Vizard | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447163 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459094 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473489 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6495812 | Wurm et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531225 | Homme et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6615063 | Ntziachristos et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6686200 | Dong et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6762420 | Homme et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6948502 | Berger et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7113217 | Nilson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7190991 | Cable et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198404 | Navab et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7338651 | Bornhop et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7394053 | Frangioni et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406967 | Callaway | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7502174 | Jensen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7734325 | Vizard et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8055045 | Kokubun et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20010012386 | Struye et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20030011701 | Nilson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030082104 | Mertelmeier | May 2003 | A1 |
20030187344 | Nilson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211158 | Frechet et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040004193 | Nilson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040089817 | Long et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040199067 | Bock et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202360 | Besson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249260 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028482 | Cable et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050122529 | Kim et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148846 | Cable et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175538 | Coquoz et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050237423 | Nilson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060064000 | Vizard et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060111613 | Boutillette et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060118742 | Levenson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173354 | Ntziachristos et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210135 | Kanegae | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239398 | McCroskey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241402 | Ichihara et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016077 | Nakaoka et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070063154 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087445 | Tearney et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070217713 | Milanfar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070238957 | Yared | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070281322 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080045797 | Yasushi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049893 | Bartzke et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080197296 | Uematsu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080281322 | Sherman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090086908 | Harder et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116717 | Kohler et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090159805 | Feke et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090238434 | Feke et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100022866 | Feke et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 111 625 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 304 070 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 619 548 | Jan 2006 | EP |
58-17544 | Jul 1981 | JP |
02-031144 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02-052246 | Feb 1990 | JP |
09-309845 | Dec 1997 | JP |
11-244220 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2001-255607 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-299786 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2003-028995 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004-121289 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005-049341 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-164577 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2004081865 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004089204 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004108902 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005027730 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2007032940 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Yamashita et al., Mist particle diameters are related to the toxicity of waterproofing sprays: Comparison between toxic and non-toxic products, Vet Human Toxicol., (2), vol. 39, Apr. 1997, pp. 71-74. |
Research Takes Many Directions, Science, vol. 303, No. 5657, Jan. 23, 2004. Advertisement (2 pages). |
Sage, Linda, “The Bare Bones of Animal Imaging”, The Scientist, vol. 19, Issue 4, Feb. 28, 2005. (4 pages). |
“Monomolecular Multimodal Fluorescence-Radiosotope Imaging Agents”, Bioconjugate Chemistry, 16(5), pp. 1232-1239, 2005. |
CosmoBio report, Mar. 2004, No. 43, “Kodak Image Station 2000MM”. (English translation of p. 18—5 pages). |
CosmoBio report, Mar. 2004, No. 43, “Kodak Image Station 2000MM”. (JP language—Foreign, 13 pages). |
Kodak Image Station 2000MM Multimodal Imaging System, Internet web address: http://www.kodak.com/US/en/health/scientific/products/imgstation2000MM/index.shtml—Sep. 16, 2004. (1 page). |
Hussain et al., Enhanced Oral Uptake of Tomato Lectin-Conjugated Nanoparticles in the Rat, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 14, No. 5, 1997, pp. 613-618. |
V.P. Torchilin, Polymer-coated long-circulating microparticulate pharmaceuticals, J. Microencapsulation, 1998, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-19. |
Alyautdin et al., Delivery of Loperamide Across the Blood-Brain Barrier with Polysorbate 80-Coated Polybutylcyanoacrylate Nanoparticles, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 14, No. 3, 1997, pp. 325-328. |
Y. Kwon et al., Enhanced antigen presentation and immunostimulation of dendritic cells using acid-degradable cationic nanoparticles, Journal of Controlled Release 105, 2005, pp. 199-212. |
Harlow et al., Antibodies—A Laboratory Manual, Chapter 5-Immunizations, 1988, pp. 91-113. |
Winter et al., Man-made antibodies, Nature—vol. 349, Jan. 24, 1991, pp. 293-299. |
Köhler et al., Derivation of specific antibody-producing tissue culture and tumor lines by cell fusion, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, Eur. J. Immunol., 1976, vol. 6, pp. 511-519. |
LoBuglio et al., Mouse/human chimeric conoclonal antibody in man: Kinetics and immune response, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 86, Jun. 1989 Immunology, pp. 4220-4224. |
De Verdiè, et al., Reversion of multidrug resistence with polyalkycyanoacrylate nanoparticles: towards a mechanism of action, BJC British Journal of Cancer, 1997, vol. 76 (2), pp. 198-205. |
Sharma et al., Novel Taxol® Formulation: Polyvinylpyrrolidone Nanoparticle-Encapsulated Taxol® for Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy, Oncology Research, vol. 8, Nos. 7/8, pp. 281-286, 1986. |
Zobel et al., Cationic Polyhexylcyanoacrylate Nanoparticles as Carriers for Antisense Oligonucleotides, Antisense & Nucleic Acid Drug Development, vol. 7, 1997, pp. 483-493. |
Burke et al., Acid-Base Equilibria of Weak Polyelectrolytes in Multilayer Thin Films, Langmuir, 2003, vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 3297-3303. |
Hrkach et al., Nanotechnology for biomaterials engineering; structural characterization of amphiphilic polymeric nanoparticles by 1H NMR spectroscopy, Biomaterials, vol. 18, No. 1, 1997, pp. 27-30. |
G. Volkheimer, Übersicht, Persorption von Mikropartikeln, Pathologies, 1993, vol. 14, pp. 247-252. |
Moghimi et al., Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects, The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, Mar. 2005, pp. 311-330. |
Soukchareun et al., Preparation and Characterization of Antisense Oligonucleotide—Peptide Hybrids Containing Viral Fusion Peptides, Bioconjugate Chem, 1995, vol. 6, pp. 43-53. |
G. Kwon et al., Block copolymer micelles as long-circulating drug vehicles, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 16, 1995, pp. 295-309. |
Labhasetwar et al., Nanoparticle drug delivery system for restenosis, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 24, 1997, pp. 63-85. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/400,935, filed Apr. 10, 2006, Publication No. 2000/0238656, Harder et al., Functionalized Poly(Ethylene Glycol). |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/165,849, filed Jun. 24, 2006, Publication No. 2006/0293396, Bringley et al., Nanoparticle Based Substrate for Image Contrast Agent Fabrication. |
Yamashita et al., Mist particle diameters are related to the toxicity of waterproofing sprays: Comparison between toxic and non-toxic products, vol. 39, 71-74. |
Cleare et al., “An Experimental Study of the Mottle Produced by X-Ray Intensifying Screens,” The Am. J. of Roent. and Rad. Physics, vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 168-174, Jul. 1962. |
Nature Methods, “Harnessing multimodality to enhance quantification and reproducibility of in vivo molecular imaging data”, by Gilbert D. Feke et al., Nov. 2008, 2 pages. |
Biochem Biophys Res Commun, Inspiration for Life Science, “Anti Human Galectin 3 Polyelonal Antibody”, by W. Zhu, 280:11831188, 2001, 2 pages. |
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, “Iodine 125 Imaging in Mice Using Nal(TI)/Flat Panel PMT Integral Assembly”, by M.N. Cinti et al., vol. 54, No. 3, Jun. 2007, pp. 461-468. |
Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., “Optimising of the Physico-Chemical Properties of a Novel Barium Sulphate Preparation for the X-Ray Examination of the Intestine”, by Barbara Laermann et al., vol. 550, 1999 Materials Research Society, pp. 59-64. |
Am. Assoc. Phys. Med., “MicroCT scanner performance and considerations for vascular specimen imaging”, by Michael Marxen et al., Med. Phys. 31 (2), Feb. 2004, pp. 305-313. |
Rat Atlas Project, Internet Study: Hubei Bioinformatics and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory, The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Photonics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, http://www.vch.org.cn/mice/method.aspx , printed from Internet on Sep. 12, 2011, (4 pages). |
Kodak Image Station 2000MM Multi-Modal Imager, Kodak Scientific Imaging Systems—advertisement—Fall/2003 (2 pages). |
Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, “Micro-Computed Tomography of the Lungs and Pulmonary-Vascular System”, by Erik L. Ritman, 2 pp. 477-480, 2005. |
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, “Significance of Incidental 18F-FDG Accumulations in the Gastrointestical Tract in PET/CT: Correlation with Endoscopic and Histopathologic Results”, by Ehab M. Kamel et al., vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 1804-1810, 2004. |
P. Mitchell, “Picture Perfect: Imaging Gives Biomarkers New Look”, Pharma DD, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 1-5 (2006). |
Virostko et al., Molecular Imaging, vol. 3, No. 4, Oct. 2004, pp. 333-342, Factors Influencing Quantification of In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging: Application to Assessment of Pancreatic Islet Transplants. |
Da Silva et al., ScienceDirect, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Design of a small animal multiomodality tomographer for X-ray and optical coupling: Theory and experiments, 2007, pp. 118-121. |
Kruger et al., HYPR-spectral photoacoustic CT for preclinical imaging, Photons Plus Ultrasound Imaging and Sensing 2009, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7177, 10 pages. |
User's Guide for Kodak Image Station 2000R, Aug. 2002, (172 Pages). |
User's Guide for Kodak Image Station 2000MM, Nov. 2003 (168 Pages). |
Corresponding WO = PCT/us2005/032504, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Mar. 27, 2007, 8 pages. |
Corresponding CN = CN 200580031808.5—SIPO First Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2009. 14 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2005/032504, dated Dec. 23, 2005, 10 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2008/010304, dated Dec. 8, 2008, 5 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US2009/000457, dated Aug. 21, 2009, 3 pages. |
Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Catalog No. SFAS0017E06, X-Ray Line Scan Camera, Jun. 2010, 4 pages. |
Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Publication No. TMCP1031E04, X-Ray Scinitllator, Jun. 2009, 4 pages. |
European Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2011 for European Application No. 10 01 2074.0, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120008742 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12763231 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 13238290 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11221530 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 12763231 | US | |
Parent | 12196300 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 11221530 | US | |
Parent | 12354830 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 12196300 | US | |
Parent | 12381599 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 12354830 | US | |
Parent | 12475623 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 12381599 | US |