The present invention relates generally to electronic (e.g., semiconductor) device manufacturing and more particularly to apparatus and methods for conditioning a polishing pad.
During conventional substrate processing, layers of material are formed on top of each other. Such layers may have surface undulations. As a result, layers being formed may be deformed by a previously formed layer. To reduce this effect, conventional semiconductor processes may employ a polishing process such as chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) or another suitable method. Such methods may employ a polishing pad to remove a portion of the layer so as to reduce the undulations.
The polishing process may employ, in addition to the polishing pad, a mixture of abrasive particles and fluid (e.g., slurry). The abrasive particles and the material being removed from the layer may become embedded in the polishing pad. Such embedded material may dislodge from the polishing pad and scratch the wafer. To remove such undesirable material, a conditioning disk may be employed. The conditioning disk may rotate while pressing the polishing pad with a force. However, the conditioning disk may apply a force and rotate at a speed that may not be controlled or well known. Thus, such a conditioning disk may not optimally remove a portion of the embedded material, thereby reducing the useful life of the polishing pad. Accordingly, there is a need to control the force and rotation of the conditioner pad.
In a first aspect of the invention, an apparatus for conditioning a polishing pad comprises an arm adapted to support a conditioning disk, a drive mechanism coupled to the arm, and a flexible coupling between the drive mechanism and the conditioning disk adapted to allow the conditioning disk to tilt while transmitting rotary motion from the drive mechanism to the conditioning disk.
Other features and aspects of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims and the accompanying drawings.
The present invention provides improved apparatus and methods for conditioning a polishing pad. More specifically, the present invention provides an apparatus and methods for controlling a conditioning disk while it is pressing on a polishing pad. The present invention includes a polishing pad conditioner. The polishing pad conditioner may include an arm, a base, a load cell, a direct drive motor and a gimbal. The polishing pad conditioner may be coupled to a conditioning disk.
In an embodiment, the polishing pad conditioner includes a leverage arm design. In the leverage arm design, the arm may be pivotally coupled to the base. The actuator and conditioning disk may be coupled such that the conditioning disk is further from the pivot than the actuator. The actuator may be coupled to the arm and adapted to apply a force between the arm and base. Since the conditioning disk is further away from the pivot than the actuator, the arm effectively reduces the actuator force to a smaller conditioning disk force in proportion to the length of the arm. Thus, the leverage arm design may reduce the actuator force, and any fluctuations in the actuator force, to a smaller conditioning disk force. Since an increase in the actuator force may not have a corresponding increase in fluctuations, the leverage arm design effectively increases the conditioning disk force to variation ratio. Accordingly, there is an improvement in the control of the conditioning disk force, thereby improving control over the removal of the embedded material. In this manner, the useful life of the polishing pad may be extended.
The polishing pad conditioner may also include a force sensor. The force sensor may measure and provide a signal indicative of the conditioning disk force. In an embodiment, the sensor may be coupled between the actuator and base. In an alternative embodiment, the sensor may be coupled between the actuator and the arm. The force sensor may measure the actuator force. As described above, the actuator force is linearly related to the sensor force in proportion to the length of the arm. Thus, the sensor may provide a signal indicative of the conditioning disk force even though it may be coupled to the actuator. The signal may be fed to a controller that is adapted to control the force applied by the actuator. By employing such a sensor, a desired quantity of conditioning disk force may be applied by the controller by applying a corresponding quantity of actuator force. Thereby, the force sensor may allow for more optimal control of the removal of the embedded material. In this manner, the useful life of the polishing pad may be extended.
The invention also provides a direct drive motor to rotate the conditioning disk. Conventional motors, not having a direct drive, may require a transmission system to rotate the conditioning disk. Such transmission systems may have piece parts with mechanical tolerances that cause a slack between the conventional motor and the rotation of the conditioning disk. The slack in the transmission system may cause undesirable variations (e.g., backlash, vibrations, and/or the like) in the rotation of the conditioning disk. By employing a direct drive motor, the transmission system and the associated slack, may be eliminated. Thus, undesirable variation in the conditioning disk rotation may be reduced or eliminated, thereby allowing for greater control over the rotation of the conditioning disk. In this manner, the useful life of the polishing pad may also be extended. However, in some embodiments, a direct drive motor coupled to a planetary gear may provide a suitable degree of control over the rotation of the conditioning disk.
The invention also provides a gimbal. The gimbal may be a flexible material such as plastic. The gimbal may be employed to transmit rotation from the direct drive motor to the conditioning disk. The gimbal may be flexible so as to allow tilting while transmitting the rotation. Concurrently, the conditioning disk may apply a pressure to the polishing pad. The flexibility to tilt while applying the pressure allows the pressure to be more uniform. This may allow more uniform removal of the embedded material. In this manner, the useful life of the polishing pad may be further extended.
The base 102 may be stationary with respect to the arm 104. For example, the base 102 may be attached to semiconductor equipment such as a CMP or other suitable equipment. Alternatively, the base 102 may be coupled to facilities supporting semiconductor manufacturing such as a wall, building structure and/or the like. As another alternative, the base 102 may rotate about a vertical axis. A motor not shown may enable the base 102 to rotate about the vertical axis. The motor may connect the base 102 to the semiconductor equipment, the other equipment, the facilities supporting semiconductor manufacturing, etc. The motor may be a direct drive motor or other suitable motor. In addition, the motor may be connected to the base 102 via a suitable transmission mechanism, such as a lead screw or zero backlash harmonic gear.
The arm 104 may freely rotate about the pivot 106 in all directions. In an alternative embodiment, the arm 104 may be free to rotate about the pivot 106 only in the plane formed by the arm 104 and the actuator 108. In either embodiment, the actuator 108 may apply a force to the base 102 and the arm 104 so as to rotate the arm 104, relative to the base 102, about the pivot 106. In addition to applying the force, the actuator 108 may expand or contract axially, thereby allowing for rotation of the arm 104 relative to the base 102 while still being coupled to the base 102 and the arm 104. More than one actuator 108 may be employed although only one actuator is depicted in
The conditioning disk 110 may rotate relative to the arm 104. The rotation of the conditioning disk 110 may be imparted to the conditioning disk 110 by the rotatable member 112. The rotation of the conditioning disk 110 may be in either direction and may be employed to condition a surface of a polishing pad. In addition, the rotation of the rotatable member 112 may be approximately the same as the rotation of the conditioning disk 110 although other suitable rotation ratios may be employed. The rotation of the conditioning disk 110 may be employed along with a pressure to condition the polishing pad.
To create the pressure, the arm 104 may be employed to press the conditioning disk 110 against the polishing pad. The force employed by the arm 104 to press the conditioning disk 110 against the polishing pad may be applied to the arm by the actuator 108 and/or other sources (e.g., weight of the arm and conditioning disk, friction and/or the like). The forces applied to the arm may form torques about the pivot 106. The forces applied to the arm may also include a polishing pad force. The polishing pad force is applied to the arm by a polishing pad pressure 114. The polishing pad pressure 114 may be applied by the polishing pad to the conditioning disk 110 when the arm presses the conditioning disk 110 to the polishing pad.
Because the arm 104 may rotate about the pivot 106, the polishing pad pressure 114 may be controlled by the actuator 108. The polishing pad force imparted on the arm by the polishing pad pressure 114 may be proportional to an actuator force applied by the actuator 108 to the arm 104. The polishing pad force 202 (see
Because the arm 104 may rotate about the pivot 106, the polishing pad force 202, the actuator force 204 and the arm weight 206 may form torques about the pivot 106. An actuator torque 214 due to the actuator force 204 may be approximately equal to the actuator force 204 multiplied by an actuator force distance 208. A polishing pad torque 216 may be approximately equal to the polishing pad force 202 multiplied by the polishing pad force distance 210. A weight torque 218 may be approximately equal to the arm weight 206 multiplied by the arm weight distance 214.
The arm weight 206 may pull the arm 104 in a downward direction (the direction of the force of gravity) while the polishing pad force 202 presses approximately upward on the arm 104. The actuator force 204 may be in the approximately upward or approximately downward direction although it is depicted in the approximately upward direction in
The leverage ratio of the leverage arm design may be a ratio of the distance between two or more forces being applied to the arm 104. Specifically, the polishing pad force 202 may be proportional to the leverage ratio of the polishing pad force distance 210 to the actuator force distance 208. Thus, if the actuator force distance 208 is smaller than the polishing pad force distance 210, the polishing pad force 202 may be smaller than the actuator force 204. For example, the leverage ratio of the polishing pad force distance 210 to actuator force distance 208 may be about 10 to about 1. In this example, and when the arm 104 is stationary, the actuator force 204 may be approximately ten times larger than the polishing pad force 202 although the actuator force 204 may be greater or smaller depending on the arm weight 206. Thus, the leverage arm design may reduce the actuator force 204 to a polishing pad force 202.
Reducing the actuator force 204 to a smaller polishing pad force 202 with the leverage arm design may be desired. An increase in the actuator force 204 may not have a corresponding increase in variation in the actuator force. Also, an increase in the actuator force 204 may not increase variations of other forces applied to the arm 104 near the actuator 108. By reducing the actuator force 204 to a smaller polishing pad force 202 using the leverage ratio, the actuator force 204 may be increased to impart a desired polishing pad force 208. In this manner, variations associated with the actuator 108 and/or other forces applied to the arm 104 may be reduced. Thus, the leverage ratio of the leverage arm design may improve the force to variation ratio, thereby improving the control over the polishing pad pressure.
In addition, the reduction in the actuator force 204 to the polishing pad force 202 may allow for greater selection in the actuator. For example, an actuator that applies a force range of about 5 lbs to about 50 lbs may be employed in a leverage arm design apparatus 100 that applies a polishing pad force 202 of about 0.5 lbs to about 5 lbs. Some applications of the leverage arm design apparatus 100 may preferably employ such force ranges. However, relatively inexpensive actuators able to apply a force range of about 0.5 lbs to about 5 lbs may not be available or may be prohibitively expensive. Thus, the leverage arm design may allow for a reduction in material costs of the leverage arm design apparatus 100 and/or employment of the leverage arm design apparatus 100 in low down force applications.
The flexible rotatable member 302 may be adapted to impart a rotation to the conditioning disk 110 such that the conditioning disk 110 rotates relative to the arm 104. Further, the flexible rotatable member 302 may also be adapted to flex when a non-uniform polishing pad pressure 304 is applied to the conditioning disk 110. The non-uniform polishing pad pressure 304 may be due to a surface of the conditioning disk 110 and a surface of the polishing pad not being coplanar or other reasons. The non-uniform polishing pad pressure 304 may also be due to other imperfections such as surface undulations of the polishing pad. The conditioning disk 110 may tilt so as to allow the non-uniform polishing pad pressure 304 to change into a more uniform polishing pad pressure 304′. The more uniform polishing pad pressure 304′ is not necessarily perfectly uniform. A flexed flexible member 302′ may allow some non-uniformity to be present in the more uniform polishing pad pressure 304′.
The flexible rotatable member 302 may include one or more portions. For example, the flexible rotatable member 302 may include an approximately rigid shaft coupled to a flexible coupler (e.g., gimbal, rubber, etc.). The flexible coupler may be coupled between the shaft and the conditioning disk 110. Conversely, the flexible coupler may be coupled between the shaft and the arm. The flexible rotatable member 302 may also be a single flexible member that is able to flex when a non-uniform polishing pad pressure 304 is applied to the conditioning disk 110.
In operation, the pad conditioner apparatus 400 may employ a leverage arm design that may be similar to the leverage arm design apparatus 100 employing the leverage ratio described with reference to
In an embodiment, the tubular arm 404 may have a portion without welds and/or seals. By employing such a portion, the tubular arm 404 may provide an improved seal to shield an internal region of the tubular arm 404 from contaminants such as slurry and/or other matter. Shielding the internal region of the tubular arm 404 may be desired so as to ensure that components such as sensors, motors and/or the like are not undesirably contaminated. In addition, the rounded top surface of the tubular arm 404 may employ gravity to remove a portion of contaminants that may be present on a surface of the tubular arm 404. Such contamination may undesirably affect the performance of the components employed by the pad conditioner apparatus 400.
To further address possible contamination, the pad conditioner apparatus 400 may also include a rounded actuator cover 416. The rounded actuator cover 416 may allow portions of the contamination on a surface of the rounded actuator cover 416 to slide off the surface. Thus, the contamination may not accumulate on the surface of the rounded actuator cover 416. This may be desired to reduce the possibility of contamination of the components of the pad conditioner apparatus 400.
In some embodiments, the rotatable conditioning disk 412 may be allowed to tilt. The rotatively driven member 414 may be coupled to a flexible mechanism similar to the flexible rotatable member 302 described with reference to
Still with reference to
In some embodiments, the gimbal 502 may be replaced by alternative means of flexing. For example, the gimbal 502 may be a flexible joint coupled to the rotatively driven member 414 and the rotatable conditioning disk 412. In alternative embodiments, the flexible portion, similar to the flexible rotatable member 302 described in reference to
Returning to
The rod may apply the pneumatic actuator force to the arm such that the pneumatic actuator force is linearly related to any displacement of the rod. As discussed above, the pneumatic actuator force may be employed to apply a rotatable conditioning disk force to the polishing pad. The linearly proportional pneumatic actuator force may be desired to ensure a more controllable rotatable conditioning disk force. For example, if the pneumatic actuator force is linearly proportional to the displacement of the rod, then it may be possible to correlate the rotatable conditioning disk force with the displacement of the rod. The manner in which the pneumatic actuator 408 may apply a force and be coupled to the tubular arm 404 and to the cylindrical base 402 is described in more detail below with reference to
In operation, the pneumatic actuator 408 may apply a force to the base extension 602 via the base rod 604 and the actuator housing 410 via the arm rod 606. The force may cause the tubular arm 404, actuator housing 410 and pivot member 608 to pivot about the housed pivot 406. Thereby the force may be employed to apply a rotatable conditioning disk force to the polishing pad as described with reference to
In a manner similar to the leverage arm design apparatus 100, the feedback actuator 702 may apply a force to the arm 104 via the force transducer 704. The force may be measured by the force transducer 704. The force transducer 704 may provide a signal to a controller 706 indicative of the force applied to the arm 104 by the feedback actuator 702. The signal indicative of the force applied to the arm 104 may be proportional to the force applied to the polishing pad by the conditioning disk 110 due to the leverage ratio as described with reference to
In alternative embodiments, the force transducer 704 may be disposed in other suitable locations. For example, the force transducer 704 may be disposed between the feedback actuator 702 and the base 102. In yet another embodiment, the force transducer 704 may be coupled to the conditioning disk 110 so as to measure the polishing pad force directly. In such an embodiment, the leverage ratio may not be employed to determine the polishing pad force.
Similar to the pad conditioner apparatus 400 described with reference to
Still with reference to
The driving mechanism 902 may be adapted to rotate the conditioning disk 110 via the rotatable member 112. The driving mechanism 902 may rotate the conditioning disk 110 while the conditioning disk 110 is pressing into a polishing pad. In some embodiments, a rotation frequency (e.g., revolutions per minute (rpm)) of a portion of the driving mechanism 902 may be approximately equal to a conditioning disk 110 rotation frequency. In the same or alternative embodiments, the rotation frequency of a portion of the driving mechanism 902 may be different than the conditioning disk 110 rotation frequency.
A weight of the driving mechanism 902 may be added to the arm weight 206. For example, the weight of the driving mechanism 902 may be added to the arm weight 206 to form an aggregate weight 904. The aggregate weight 904 may be different than the weight of the arm 104. In addition, the distance of the combined center of gravity 906 from the pivot 106 may be different than the center of gravity 212. Thus, the leverage ratio, discussed in detail with reference to
The driving mechanism 902 may be a motor or another suitable driving mechanism. For example, the driving mechanism 902 may be an electrical motor. In alternative embodiments, the driving mechanism 902 may be a pneumatically driven motor. In further alternative embodiments, the driving mechanism may be a direct drive motor, which may be coupled to a planetary gear.
The motor 1002 may be a direct drive motor or another suitable motor. In other embodiments, the motor 1002 may be coupled to a planetary gear. The motor 1002 may be directly coupled to the rotatively driven member 414 so as to rotate the rotatable conditioning disk 412 at about the same rotation frequency as a rotatable portion of the motor 1002. In other embodiments, the motor 1002 may be coupled to the rotatable conditioning disk 412 such that the rotation frequency of the rotatable portion of the motor 1002 may be different than the rotation frequency of the rotatable conditioning disk 412.
The foregoing description discloses only exemplary embodiments of the invention. Modifications of the above disclosed apparatus and method which fall within the scope of the invention will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. For instance, an actuator may be disposed in other locations relative to the base. The actuator may be coupled to the arm and something other than the base so as to apply a polishing pad pressure.
Accordingly, while the present invention has been disclosed in connection with exemplary embodiments thereof, it should be understood that other embodiments may fall within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the following claims.
This application is a division of, and claims priority to, U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 12/245,758, filed Oct. 5, 2008, and titled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR CONDITIONING A POLISHING PAD”, which is a division of, and claims priority to, U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 11/684,969, filed Mar. 12, 2007, and titled, “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR CONDITIONING A POLISHING PAD”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/782,133, filed Mar. 13, 2006, and titled, “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR CONDITIONING A POLISHING PAD”. Each of these patent applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3819991 | Weigele et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4382308 | Curcio | May 1983 | A |
4987700 | Westerman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5475889 | Thrasher et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486129 | Sandhu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5700180 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5738574 | Tolles et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743784 | Birang et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5846882 | Birang | Dec 1998 | A |
5875507 | Stephens et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901400 | Fulop | May 1999 | A |
5943726 | Eitoku et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6059888 | Hillman | May 2000 | A |
6070284 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6123607 | Ravkin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143089 | Stephens et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6217430 | Koga et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230753 | Jones et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6254688 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269510 | Beardsley et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6306008 | Moore | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6345404 | Stephens et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347981 | Holzapfel | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350184 | Holzapfel | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352596 | Beardsley et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6371838 | Holzapfel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409580 | Lougher et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425158 | Ravkin | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6493896 | Stuchlik et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6575177 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
RE38228 | Hirose et al. | Aug 2003 | E |
6607426 | Suzuki | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623334 | Birang et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6676493 | Owczarz et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6739013 | Glashauser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6749494 | Mandall | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6887129 | Birang | May 2005 | B2 |
6887138 | Bottema et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896583 | Rodriquez et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902470 | Cron | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6905400 | Kimura et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6918864 | Brown et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6935938 | Gotkis et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6986185 | Sugarman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994612 | Cron | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7037178 | Cron | May 2006 | B2 |
7229504 | Sugarman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7377002 | Yudovsky et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7507296 | Sugarman | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20010001886 | Ueki et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20020005212 | Beardsley et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020116773 | Anderson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020139393 | Crevasse et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173233 | Griffin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030000550 | Middendorf et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030131872 | Nishihara | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153252 | Cron | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030166383 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040097176 | Cron | May 2004 | A1 |
20040259487 | Bottema et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050109373 | Brown et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050221731 | Charatan | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060189465 | Brown et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205324 | Mayes | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070212983 | Nangoy et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080210258 | Yudovsky et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090036035 | Nangoy et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090036036 | Nangoy et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 248 459 | Mar 2000 | CA |
2 276 537 | Oct 1994 | GB |
02-303580 | Dec 1990 | JP |
03-313421 | Nov 1991 | JP |
05-129260 | May 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100093263 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60782133 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12245758 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 12636326 | US | |
Parent | 11684969 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12245758 | US |