The present specification generally relates to apparatuses and methods for laser processing transparent workpieces, and more particularly, to forming contour lines in transparent workpieces for separating transparent workpieces.
The area of laser processing of materials encompasses a wide variety of applications that involve cutting, drilling, milling, welding, melting, etc. of different types of materials. Among these processes, one that is of particular interest is cutting or separating different types of transparent substrates in a process that may be utilized in the production of materials such as glass, sapphire, or fused silica for thin film transistors (TFT) or display materials for electronic devices.
From process development and cost perspectives there are many opportunities for improvement in cutting and separating glass substrates. It is of great interest to have a faster, cleaner, cheaper, more repeatable, and more reliable method of separating glass substrates than what is currently practiced in the market. Accordingly, a need exists for alternative improved methods for separating glass substrates.
According to one embodiment, a method for laser processing a transparent workpiece includes forming a contour line in the transparent workpiece, the contour line including defects in the transparent workpiece. Forming the contour line includes directing a pulsed laser beam oriented along a beam pathway and output by a beam source through a beam converting element and directing the pulsed laser beam through a phase modifying optical element and into the transparent workpiece such that the portion of the pulsed laser beam directed into the transparent workpiece includes a phase shifted focal line having a cross-sectional phase contour transverse a beam propagation direction of the pulsed laser beam. Further, the cross-sectional phase contour includes one or more phase contour ridges induced by the phase modifying optical element, the one or more phase contour ridges extending along one or more phase ridge lines. Moreover, the phase shifted focal line generates an induced absorption within the transparent workpiece, the induced absorption producing a defect within the transparent workpiece including a central defect region and at least one radial arm that extends outward from the central defect region in a radial defect direction oriented within 20° of the one or more phase ridge lines of the phase shifted focal line.
In another embodiment, a method for laser processing a transparent workpiece including localizing a pulsed laser beam in the transparent workpiece, the pulsed laser beam propagating along an optical pathway in a beam propagation direction and having a pulse energy and pulse duration sufficient to exceed a damage threshold of the transparent workpiece and a phase shifted focal line that projects an axisymmetric beam spot onto an imaging surface of the transparent workpiece and has a cross-sectional phase contour at the axisymmetric beam spot. Further, the cross-sectional phase contour includes one or more phase contour ridges extending along the cross-sectional phase contour along a phase ridge line. Moreover, the phase shifted focal line generates an induced absorption within the transparent workpiece, the induced absorption producing a defect within the transparent workpiece having a central defect region and at least one radial arm that extends outward from the central defect region in a radial defect direction oriented within 20° of the one or more phase ridge lines of the phase shifted focal line.
In yet another embodiment, a method for laser processing a transparent workpiece includes forming a contour line in the transparent workpiece, the contour line including defects in the transparent workpiece. Forming the contour line includes directing a pulsed laser beam oriented along a beam pathway and output by a beam source through an aspheric optical element and directing the pulsed laser beam through a phase modifying optical element and into the transparent workpiece such that the portion of the pulsed laser beam directed into the transparent workpiece includes a phase shifted focal line. The phase shifted focal line includes a leading portion phase shifted from a trailing portion such that the leading portion of the phase shifted focal line irradiates the transparent workpiece before the trailing portion of the phase shifted focal line irradiates the transparent workpiece. Further, the phase shifted focal line generates an induced absorption within the transparent workpiece, the induced absorption producing a defect within the transparent workpiece including a central defect region and at least one radial arm that extends outward from the central defect region in a radial defect direction. Moreover, the phase shifted focal line projects an axisymmetric beam spot onto an imaging surface of the transparent workpiece.
Additional features and advantages of the processes and systems described herein will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the embodiments described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description describe various embodiments and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the claimed subject matter. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the various embodiments, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate the various embodiments described herein, and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operations of the claimed subject matter.
The embodiments set forth in the drawings are illustrative and exemplary in nature and not intended to limit the subject matter defined by the claims. The following detailed description of the illustrative embodiments can be understood when read in conjunction with the following drawings, where like structure is indicated with like reference numerals and in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of processes for laser processing transparent workpieces, such as glass workpieces, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Whenever possible, the same reference numerals will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. According to one or more embodiments described herein, a transparent workpiece may be laser processed to form a contour line in the transparent workpiece comprising a series of defects that define a desired separation of the transparent workpiece into two or more portions. According to one embodiment, a pulsed laser outputs a pulsed laser beam through one or more optical components such that the pulsed laser beam projects a phase shifted focal line having a cross-sectional phase contour with one or more phase contour ridges extending along a phase ridge line. The phase shifted focal line may be utilized to create a series of defects in the transparent workpiece thereby defining the contour line. These defects may be referred to, in various embodiments herein, as line defects, perforations, or nano-perforations in the workpiece. Further, these defects may include a central defect region and radial arms that primarily form in a radial defect direction corresponding with one or more phase ridge lines of the phase shifted focal line (e.g., oriented within about 30° of the one or more phase ridge lines, for example, within about 20° of the one or more phase ridge lines, 10° of the one or more phase ridge lines, 5° of the one or more phase ridge lines, or the like, for example, parallel to the one or more phase ridge lines). In some embodiments, the process may further include separating the transparent workpiece along the contour line, for example, using an infrared laser or other laser configured to heat the area of the transparent workpiece adjacent to the contour line or to bend, scribe, or otherwise mechanically stress the transparent workpiece. In other embodiments, the transparent workpiece may be mechanically stressed to cause separation, or separation may occur spontaneously. While not intended to be limited by theory, stressing the transparent workpiece at the contour line may propagate a crack along the contour line. By controlling the direction of the radial arms of each defect along the contour line, the crack propagation may be better controlled. Various embodiments of methods and apparatuses for processing a transparent workpiece will be described herein with specific reference to the appended drawings.
The phrase “transparent workpiece,” as used herein, means a workpiece formed from glass or glass-ceramic which is transparent, where the term “transparent,” as used herein, means that the material has an optical absorption of less than about 20% per mm of material depth, such as less than about 10% per mm of material depth for the specified pulsed laser wavelength, or such as less than about 1% per mm of material depth for the specified pulsed laser wavelength. According to one or more embodiments, the transparent workpiece may have a thickness of from about 50 microns to about 10 mm (such as from about 100 microns to about 5 mm, or from about 0.5 mm to about 3 mm).
According to one or more embodiments, the present disclosure provides methods for processing workpieces. As used herein, “laser processing” may include forming contour lines in workpieces, separating workpieces, or combinations thereof. Transparent workpieces may comprise glass workpieces formed from glass compositions, such as borosilicate glass, soda-lime glass, aluminosilicate glass, alkali aluminosilicate glass, alkaline earth aluminosilicate glass, alkaline earth boro-aluminosilicate glass, fused silica, or crystalline materials such as sapphire, silicon, gallium arsenide, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the glass may be ion-exchangeable, such that the glass composition can undergo ion-exchange for mechanical strengthening before or after laser processing the transparent workpiece. For example, the transparent workpiece may comprise ion exchanged and ion exchangeable glass, such as Corning Gorilla® Glass available from Corning Incorporated of Corning, N.Y. (e.g., code 2318, code 2319, and code 2320). Further, these ion exchanged glasses may have coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) of from about 6 ppm/° C. to about 10 ppm/° C. In some embodiments, the glass composition of the transparent workpiece may include greater than about 1.0 mol. % boron and/or compounds containing boron, including, without limitation, B2O3. In another embodiment, the glass compositions from which the transparent workpieces are formed include less than or equal to about 1.0 mol. % of oxides of boron and/or compounds containing boron. Moreover, the transparent workpiece may comprise other components which are transparent to the wavelength of the laser, for example, crystals such as sapphire or zinc selenide.
Some transparent workpieces may be utilized as display and/or TFT (thin film transistor) substrates. Some examples of such glasses or glass compositions suitable for display or TFT use are EAGLE XG®, CONTEGO, and CORNING LOTUS™ available from Corning Incorporated of Corning, N.Y. The alkaline earth boro-aluminosilicate glass compositions may be formulated to be suitable for use as substrates for electronic applications including, without limitation, substrates for TFTs. The glass compositions used in conjunction with TFTs typically have CTEs similar to that of silicon (such as less than 5×10−6/K, or even less than 4×10−6/K, for example, approximately 3×10−6/K, or about 2.5×10−6/K to about 3.5×10−6/K), and have low levels of alkali within the glass. Low levels of alkali (e.g., trace amounts of about 0 wt. % to 2 wt. %, such as less than 1 wt. %, for example, less than 0.5 wt. %) may be used in TFT applications because alkali dopants, under some conditions, leach out of glass and contaminate or “poison” the TFTs, possibly rendering the TFTs inoperable. According to embodiments, the laser cutting processes described herein may be used to separate transparent workpieces in a controlled fashion with negligible debris, minimum defects, and low subsurface damage to the edges, preserving workpiece integrity and strength.
The phrase “contour line,” as used herein, denotes a line (e.g., a line, a curve, etc.) formed along a desired separation line on the surface of a transparent workpiece along which a transparent workpiece will be separated into multiple portions upon exposure to the appropriate processing conditions. The contour line generally consists of one or more defects introduced into the transparent workpiece using various techniques. As used herein, a “defect” may include an area of modified material (relative to the bulk material), void space, scratch, flaw, hole, or other deformities in the transparent workpiece which enables separation spontaneously or by additional processing, such as by infrared laser processing, mechanical stress, or other separation processes. Moreover, each defect may comprise a central defect region and one or more radial arms extending outward from the central defect region along an imaging surface of the transparent workpiece. As used herein the “imaging surface” of the transparent workpiece is the surface of the transparent workpiece at which the pulsed laser beam initially contacts the transparent workpiece.
As described in more detail below, the radial orientation of the one or more radial arms may be controlled by the orientation of the cross-sectional phase contour of the phase shifted focal line that irradiates the transparent workpiece. As one example, a pulsed laser beam comprising a phase shifted focal line comprising one or more phase contour ridges extending along one or more phase ridge lines may irradiate the imaging plane of the transparent workpiece to generate defects that comprise a central defect region and one or more radial arms extending from the central defect region in a radial defect direction corresponding with the one or more phase ridge lines, for example, oriented within about 30° of the one or more phase ridge lines, for example, within about 20° of the one or more phase ridge lines, 10° of the one or more phase ridge lines, 5° of the one or more phase ridge lines, or the like, for example, parallel to the one or more phase ridge lines. Further, the central defect region may be substantially co-located with a center of a beam spot projected onto the imaging surface of the transparent workpiece by the phase shifted focal line.
A transparent workpiece, such as a glass substrate or the like, may be separated into multiple portions by first forming a contour line on the surface of the workpiece and, thereafter, heating, for example, using an infrared laser, the surface of the workpiece on the contour line to create stresses in the workpiece, such as thermal stresses. The stresses ultimately lead to separation of the workpiece along the contour line. Further, when each defect is formed using a pulsed laser beam having a phase shifted focal line oriented such that the one or more phase contour ridges of the cross-sectional phase contour extend along or approximately parallel to one or more phase ridge lines that extend substantially along or approximately parallel to the desired separation line, crack propagation caused by stressing defects in the transparent workpiece along the contour line may extend in the desired separation line. Forming defects having radial arms that extend in the direction of the desired separation line may allow the defects to be spaced apart at larger spacing distances than defects having randomly extending radial arms or no radial arms, without damage to the edges of the separated transparent workpieces where the contour line existed prior to separation. Moreover, forming defects having radial arms that extend in a radial defect direction along the direction of the desired separation line allows crack propagation to be generated by less stress, e.g., less energy, such as thermal energy, applied to the workpiece, limiting damage to the edges of the separated transparent workpieces where the contour line existed prior to separation. In contrast, when defects include randomly extending radial arms or no radial arms, cracks may propagate from the separated edge in a direction generally perpendicular to the edge of the separated transparent workpiece (i.e., generally perpendicular to the desired separation line denoted by the contour line) which weaken the edges of separated transparent workpiece.
Referring now to
Referring also to
As depicted in
Referring to
Further, the pulsed laser beam 112 may be translated relative to the transparent workpiece 160 (e.g., in a translation direction 101) to form the plurality of defects 172 of the contour line 170. Directing or localizing the pulsed laser beam 112 into the transparent workpiece 160 causes portions of the transparent workpiece 160 to fracture, for example, depositing enough energy to break chemical bonds in the transparent workpiece 160 at spaced locations along the desired separation line 165 to form the defects 172. According to one or more embodiments, the pulsed laser beam 112 may be translated across the transparent workpiece 160 by motion of the transparent workpiece 160 (e.g., motion of a translation stage 190 coupled to the transparent workpiece 160), motion of the pulsed laser beam 112 (e.g., motion of the phase shifted focal line 113), or motion of both the transparent workpiece 160 and the phase shifted focal line 113. By translating the phase shifted focal line 113 relative to the transparent workpiece 160, the plurality of defects 172 may be formed in the transparent workpiece 160.
Referring now to
Referring again to
Referring still to
Further, while not intending to be limited by theory, the phase shifted focal line 113 may comprise a leading portion and a trailing portion. The leading portion of the phase shifted focal line 113 is phase shifted from the trailing portion of the phase shifted focal line 113 such that the leading portion of the phase shifted focal line irradiates the imaging surface 162 of the transparent workpiece 160 before the trailing portion of the phase shifted focal line 113 irradiates the imaging surface 162 of the transparent workpiece 160. When the phase shifted focal line 113 first irradiates the imaging surface 162 of the transparent workpiece 160, the leading portion of the phase shifted focal line 113 comprises one or more of the phase contour ridges 154 of the cross-sectional phase contour 150 nearest the cross-sectional center 115 (and thereby near the peak intensity) of the beam spot 114, which is incident on the imaging surface 162, such that leading portion of the phase shifted focal line 113 is substantially oriented along or approximately the phase ridge lines 151. As a result, the material response of the transparent workpiece 160 to the phase shifted focal line 113 is not radially symmetric and instead extends substantially along the phase ridge lines 151, which in turn leads to the directional cracks, instead of random cracks.
Thus, in operation, the cross-sectional phase contour 150 may influence the cross sectional shape of the defects 172 formed by the pulsed laser beam 112 in the transparent workpiece 160. Cross-sectional shape of the defects 172 refers to shape of the defects in the direction perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the pulsed laser beam 112. If, for example, a laser beam is normally incident to the imaging surface 162 of the transparent workpiece 160, the cross-sectional shape of the defect 172 corresponds to the shape of the defects 172 in the plane of the imaging surface 162, or in any plane parallel to the plane of the imaging surface 162 of the workpiece.
Generating a cross-sectional phase contour 150 having one or more phase contour ridges 154 leads to more effective cutting, fewer defects, and higher edge strength in separated parts. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that a phase shifted focal line 113 comprising the cross-sectional phase contour 150 having one or more phase contour ridges 154 extending along the phase ridge lines 151, which are oriented along or parallel (or approximately along or parallel) the desired separation line 165 improves cutting by directing crack orientation along the trajectory of cutting. In the case of a cross-sectional phase contour 150 that does not include the one or more phase contour ridges 154, it is believed that stresses associated with the formation of damage regions are concentrated near the damage region, but with random orientations. The random stress orientations are believed to lead to fracture in directions away from the intended trajectory of cutting, manifested as micro cracks and other defects in separated parts. It is believed that such micro cracks and defects reduce the mechanical strength of the bulk and/or edges of separated parts. By employing the cross-sectional phase contour 150 having the one or more phase contour ridges 154 extending along phase ridge lines 151 oriented along or parallel (or approximately along or parallel) the desired separation line 165, it is believed that defects or cracks associated with forming damage regions can be directed along the cut with the formation of fewer cracks or defects in directions away from the desired separation line 165. Defects of cracks aligned with the desired separation line 165 are preferred to defects or cracks directed away from the desired separation line 165.
Referring again to
The pulsed laser beam 112 at the beam spot 114 or other cross sections may comprise a quasi-non-diffracting beam, for example, a beam having low beam divergence as mathematically defined below, by propagating the pulsed laser beam 112 (e.g., outputting the pulsed laser beam 112, such as a Gaussian beam, using a beam source 110) through a beam converting element 120, such as an aspheric optical element 122 or an annular aperture, as described in more detail below with respect to the optical assemblies 100 depicted in
Diffraction is one factor that leads to divergence of pulsed laser beams 112. Other factors include focusing or defocusing caused by the optical systems forming the pulsed laser beams 112 or refraction and scattering at interfaces. Pulsed laser beams 112 for forming the defects 172 of the contour line 170 may have beam spots 114 with low divergence and weak diffraction. The divergence of the pulsed laser beam 112 is characterized by the Rayleigh range ZR, which is related to the variance σ2 of the intensity distribution and beam propagation factor M2 of the pulsed laser beam 112. In the discussion that follows, formulas will be presented using a Cartesian coordinate system. Corresponding expressions for other coordinate systems are obtainable using mathematical techniques known to those of skill in the art. Additional information on beam divergence can be found in the articles entitled “New Developments in Laser Resonators” by A. E. Siegman in SPIE Symposium Series Vol. 1224, p. 2 (1990) and “M2 factor of Bessel-Gauss beams” by R. Borghi and M. Santarsiero in Optics Letters, Vol. 22(5), 262 (1997), the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Additional information can also be found in the international standards ISO 11146-1:2005(E) entitled “Lasers and laser-related equipment—Test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios—Part 1: Stigmatic and simple astigmatic beams”, ISO 11146-2:2005(E) entitled “Lasers and laser-related equipment—Test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios—Part 2: General astigmatic beams”, and ISO 11146-3:2004(E) entitled “Lasers and laser-related equipment—Test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios—Part 3: Intrinsic and geometrical laser beam classification, propagation and details of test methods”, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The spatial coordinates of the centroid of the intensity profile of the pulsed laser beam 112 having a time-averaged intensity profile I(x, y, z) are given by the following expressions:
These are also known as the first moments of the Wigner distribution and are described in Section 3.5 of ISO 11146-2:2005(E). Their measurement is described in Section 7 of ISO 11146-2:2005(E).
Variance is a measure of the width, in the cross-sectional (X-Y) plane, of the intensity distribution of the pulsed laser beam 112 as a function of position z in the direction of beam propagation. For an arbitrary laser beam, variance in the X-direction may differ from variance in the Y-direction. We let σx2(z) and σy2(z) represent the variances in the X-direction and Y-direction, respectively. Of particular interest are the variances in the near field and far field limits. We let σ0x2(z) and σ0y2(z) represent variances in the X-direction and Y-direction, respectively, in the near field limit, and we let σ∞x2(z) and σ∞y2(z) represent variances in the X-direction and Y-direction, respectively, in the far field limit. For a laser beam having a time-averaged intensity profile I(x,y,z) with Fourier transform Ĩ(vx,vy) (where vx and vy are spatial frequencies in the X-direction and Y-direction, respectively), the near field and far field variances in the x-direction and y-direction are given by the following expressions:
The variance quantities σ0x2(z), σ0y2(z), σ∞x2, and σ∞y2 are also known as the diagonal elements of the Wigner distribution (see ISO 11146-2:2005(E)). These variances can be quantified for an experimental laser beam using the measurement techniques described in Section 7 of ISO 11146-2:2005(E). In brief, the measurement uses a linear unsaturated pixelated detector to measure I(x, y) over a finite spatial region that approximates the infinite integration area of the integral equations which define the variances and the centroid coordinates. The appropriate extent of the measurement area, background subtraction and the detector pixel resolution are determined by the convergence of an iterative measurement procedure described in Section 7 of ISO 11146-2:2005(E). The numerical values of the expressions given by equations 1-6 are calculated numerically from the array of intensity values as measured by the pixelated detector.
Through the Fourier transform relationship between the transverse amplitude profile ũ(x,y,z) for an arbitrary optical beam (where I(x,y,z)≡|ũ(x,y,z)|2) and the spatial-frequency distribution {tilde over (P)}(vx,vy,z) for an arbitrary optical beam (where Ĩ(vx,vy)≡|{tilde over (P)}(vx,vy,z)|2), it can be shown that:
σx2(z)=σ0x2(z0x)+λ2σ∞x2(z−z0x)2 (7)
σy2(z)=σ0y2(z0y)+λ2σ∞y2(z−z0y) (8)
In equations (7) and (8), σ0x2(z0x) and σ0y2(z0y) are minimum values of σ0x2(z) and σ0y2(z), which occur at waist positions z0x and z0y in the x-direction and y-direction, respectively, and λ is the wavelength of the beam. Equations (7) and (8) indicate that σx2(z) and σy2(z) increase quadratically with z in either direction from the minimum values associated with the waist position of the beam. Further, in the embodiments described herein comprising a beam spot 114 that is axisymmetric and thereby comprises an axisymmetric intensity distribution I(x,y), σx2(z)=σy2(z) and in the embodiments described herein comprising a beam spot 114 that is non-axisymmetric and thereby comprises a non-axisymmetric intensity distribution I(x,y), σx2(z)≠σy2(z), i.e., σx2(z)<σy2(z) or σx2(z)>σy2(z).
Equations (7) and (8) can be rewritten in terms of a beam propagation factor M2, where separate beam propagations factors Mx2 and My2 for the x-direction and the y-direction are defined as:
Mx2≡4πσ0xσ∞x (9)
My2≡4πσ0yσ∞y (10)
Rearrangement of Equations (9) and (10) and substitution into Equations (7) and (8) yields:
which can be rewritten as:
where the Rayleigh ranges ZRx and ZRy in the x-direction and y-direction, respectively, are given by:
The Rayleigh range corresponds to the distance (relative to the position of the beam waist as defined in Section 3.12 of ISO 11146-1:2005(E)) over which the variance of the laser beam doubles (relative to the variance at the position of the beam waist) and is a measure of the divergence of the cross sectional area of the laser beam. Further, in the embodiments described herein comprising a beam spot 114 that is axisymmetric and thereby comprises an axisymmetric intensity distribution I(x,y), ZRx=ZRy and in the embodiments described herein comprising a beam spot 114 that is non-axisymmetric and thereby comprises a non-axisymmetric intensity distribution I(x,y), ZRx≠ZRy, i.e., ZRx<ZRy or ZRx>ZRy. The Rayleigh range can also be observed as the distance along the beam axis at which the optical intensity decays to one half of its value observed at the beam waist location (location of maximum intensity). Laser beams with large Rayleigh ranges have low divergence and expand more slowly with distance in the beam propagation direction than laser beams with small Rayleigh ranges.
The formulas above can be applied to any laser beam (not just Gaussian beams) by using the intensity profile I(x,y,z) that describes the laser beam. In the case of the TEM00 mode of a Gaussian beam, the intensity profile is given by:
where wo is the radius (defined as the radius at which beam intensity decreases to 1/e2 of the peak beam intensity of the beam at a beam waist position zo. From Equation (17) and the above formulas, we obtain the following results for a TEM00 Gaussian beam:
where ZR=ZRx=ZRy. For Gaussian beams, it is further noted that M2=Mx2=My2=1.
Beam cross section is characterized by shape and dimensions. The dimensions of the beam cross section are characterized by a spot size of the beam. For a Gaussian beam, spot size is frequently defined as the radial extent at which the intensity of the beam decreases to 1/e2 of its maximum value, denoted in Equation (17) as w0. The maximum intensity of a Gaussian beam occurs at the center (x=0 and y=0 (Cartesian) or r=0 (cylindrical)) of the intensity distribution and radial extent used to determine spot size is measured relative to the center.
Beams with axisymmetric (i.e. rotationally symmetric around the beam propagation axis Z) cross sections can be characterized by a single dimension or spot size that is measured at the beam waist location as specified in Section 3.12 of ISO 11146-1:2005(E). For a Gaussian beam, Equation (17) shows that spot size is equal to wo, which from Equation (18) corresponds to 2σ0x or 2σ0y. For an axisymmetric beam having an axisymmetric cross section, such as a circular cross section, σ0x=σ0y. Thus, for axisymmetric beams, the cross section dimension may be characterized with a single spot size parameter, where wo=2σ0. Spot size can be similarly defined for non-axisymmetric beam cross sections where, unlike an axisymmetric beam, σ0x≠σ0y. Thus, when the spot size of the beam is non-axisymmetric, it is necessary to characterize the cross-sectional dimensions of a non-axisymmetric beam with two spot size parameters: wox and woy in the x-direction and y-direction, respectively, where
wox=2σ0x (25)
woy=2σ0y (26)
Further, the lack of axial (i.e. arbitrary rotation angle) symmetry for a non-axisymmetric beam means that the results of a calculation of values of σ0x and σ0y will depend on the choice of orientation of the x-axis and y-axis. ISO 11146-1:2005(E) refers to these reference axes as the principal axes of the power density distribution (Section 3.3-3.5) and in the following discussion we will assume that the x and y axes are aligned with these principal axes. Further, an angle ϕ about which the x-axis and y-axis may be rotated in the cross-sectional plane (e.g., an angle of the x-axis and y-axis relative to reference positions for the x-axis and y-axis, respectively) may be used to define minimum (wo,min) and maximum values (wo,max) of the spot size parameters for a non-axisymmetric beam:
wo,min=2σ0,min (27)
wo,max=2σ0,max (28)
where 2σ0,min=2σ0x(ϕmin,x)=2σ0y(ϕmin,y) and 2σ0,max=2σ0x(ϕmax,x)=2σ0y(ϕmax,y) The magnitude of the axial asymmetry of the beam cross section can be quantified by the aspect ratio, where the aspect ratio is defined as the ratio of wo,max to wo,min. An axisymmetric beam cross section has an aspect ratio of 1.0, while elliptical and other non-axisymmetric beam cross sections have aspect ratios greater than 1.0, for example, greater than 1.1, greater than 1.2, greater than 1.3, greater than 1.4, greater than 1.5, greater than 1.6, greater than 1.7, greater than 1.8, greater than 1.9, greater than 2.0, greater than 3.0, greater than 5.0, greater than 10.0, or the like
To promote uniformity of defects 172 in the beam propagation direction (e.g. depth dimension of the transparent workpiece 160), a pulsed laser beam 112 having low divergence may be used. In one or more embodiments, pulsed laser beams 112 having low divergence may be utilized for forming defects 172. As noted above, divergence can be characterized by the Rayleigh range. For non-axisymmetric beams, Rayleigh ranges for the principal axes X and Y are defined by Equations (15) and (16) for the x-direction and y-direction, respectively, where it can be shown that for any real beam, Mx2>1 and My2>1 and where σ0x2 and σ0y2 are determined by the intensity distribution of the laser beam. For symmetric beams, Rayleigh range is the same in the X-direction and Y-direction and is expressed by Equation (22) or Equation (23). Low divergence correlates with large values of the Rayleigh range and weak diffraction of the laser beam.
Beams with Gaussian intensity profiles may be less preferred for laser processing to form defects because, when focused to small enough spot sizes (such as spot sizes in the range of microns, such as about 1-5 microns or about 1-10 microns) to enable available laser pulse energies to modify materials such as glass, they are highly diffracting and diverge significantly over short propagation distances. To achieve low divergence, it is desirable to control or optimize the intensity distribution of the pulsed laser beam to reduce diffraction. Pulsed laser beams may be non-diffracting or weakly diffracting. Weakly diffracting laser beams include quasi-non-diffracting laser beams. Representative weakly diffracting laser beams include Bessel beams, Gauss-Bessel beams, Airy beams, Weber beams, and Mathieu beams.
For non-axisymmetric beams, the Rayleigh ranges ZRx and ZRy are unequal. Equations (15) and (16) indicate that ZRx and ZRy depend on σ0x and σ0y, respectively, and above we noted that the values of σ0x and σ0y depend on the orientation of the X-axis and Y-axis. The values of ZRx and ZRy will accordingly vary, and each will have a minimum value and a maximum value that correspond to the principal axes, with the minimum value of ZRx being denoted as ZRx,min and the minimum value of of ZRy being denoted ZRy,min for an arbitrary beam profile ZRx,min and ZRy,min can be shown to be given by
Since divergence of the laser beam occurs over a shorter distance in the direction having the smallest Rayleigh range, the intensity distribution of the pulsed laser beam used for cutting may be controlled so that the minimum values of ZRx and ZRy (or for axisymmetric beams, the value of ZR) are as large as possible. Since the minimum value ZRx,min of ZRx and the minimum value ZRy,min of ZRy differ for a non-axisymmetric beam, a laser beam with an intensity distribution may be used that makes the smaller of ZRx,min and ZRy,min as large as possible when forming damage regions.
In different embodiments, the smaller of ZRx,min and ZRy,min (or for axisymmetric beams, the value of ZR) is greater than or equal to 50 μm, greater than or equal to 100 μm, greater than or equal to 200 μm, greater than or equal to 300 μm, greater than or equal to 500 μm, greater than or equal to 1 mm, greater than or equal to 2 mm, greater than or equal to 3 mm, greater than or equal to 5 mm, in the range from 50 μm to 10 mm, in the range from 100 μm to 5 mm, in the range from 200 μm to 4 mm, in the range from 300 μm to 2 mm, or the like.
The values and ranges for the smaller of ZRx,min and ZRy,min (or for axisymmetric beams, the value of ZR) specified herein are achievable for different wavelengths to which the workpiece is transparent through adjustment of the spot size parameter wo,min defined in Equation (27). In different embodiments, the spot size parameter wo,min is greater than or equal to 0.25 μm, greater than or equal to 0.50 μm, greater than or equal to 0.75 μm, greater than or equal to 1.0 μm, greater than or equal to 2.0 μm, greater than or equal to 3.0 μm, greater than or equal to 5.0 μm, in the range from 0.25 μm to 10 μm, in the range from 0.25 μm to 5.0 μm, in the range from 0.25 μm to 2.5 μm, in the range from 0.50 μm to 10 μm, in the range from 0.50 μm to 5.0 μm, in the range from 0.50 μm to 2.5 μm, in the range from 0.75 μm to 10 μm, in the range from 0.75 μm to 5.0 μm, in the range from 0.75 μm to 2.5 μm, or the like.
Non-diffracting or quasi non-diffracting beams generally have complicated intensity profiles, such as those that decrease non-monotonically vs. radius. By analogy to a Gaussian beam, an effective spot size wo,eff can be defined for non-axisymmetric beams as the shortest radial distance, in any direction, from the radial position of the maximum intensity (r=0) at which the intensity decreases to 1/e2 of the maximum intensity. Further, for axisymmetric beams wo,eff is the radial distance from the radial position of the maximum intensity (r=0) at which the intensity decreases to 1/e2 of the maximum intensity. A criterion for Rayleigh range based on the effective spot size wo,eff for non-axisymmetric beams or the spot size wo for axisymmetric beams can be specified as non-diffracting or quasi non-diffracting beams for forming damage regions using equation (31) for non-axisymmetric beams of equation (32) for axisymmetric beams, below:
where FD is a dimensionless divergence factor having a value of at least 10, at least 50, at least 100, at least 250, at least 500, at least 1000, in the range from 10 to 2000, in the range from 50 to 1500, in the range from 100 to 1000. By comparing Equation (31) to Equation (22) or (23), one can see that for a non-diffracting or quasi non-diffracting beam the distance, Smaller of ZRx,min, ZRy,min in Equation (31), over which the effective beam size doubles, is FD times the distance expected if a typical Gaussian beam profile were used. The dimensionless divergence factor FD provides a criterion for determining whether or not a laser beam is quasi-non-diffracting. As used herein, a laser beam is considered quasi-non-diffracting if the characteristics of the laser beam satisfy Equation (31) or Equation (32) with a value of FD≥10. As the value of FD increases, the laser beam approaches a more nearly perfectly non-diffracting state. Moreover, it should be understood that Equation (32) is merely a simplification of Equation (31) and as such, Equation (31) mathematically describes the dimensionless divergence factor FD for both axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric beams.
Referring now to
The one or more lenses 130 may include one or more focusing lenses, such as a first focusing lens 132 and a second focusing lens 134. The one or more lenses 130 may also include a collimating lens 136 and an expanding lens 138. In the optical assembly 100 of
The optical assembly 100 depicted in each of
Referring still to
Suitable laser wavelengths for forming defects 172 are wavelengths at which the combined losses of linear absorption and scattering by the transparent workpiece 160 are sufficiently low. In embodiments, the combined losses due to linear absorption and scattering by the transparent workpiece 160 at the wavelength are less than 20%/mm, or less than 15%/mm, or less than 10%/mm, or less than 5%/mm, or less than 1%/mm, where the dimension “/mm” means per millimeter of distance within the transparent workpiece 160 in the beam propagation direction of the pulsed laser beam 112 (e.g., the Z direction). Representative wavelengths for many glass workpieces include fundamental and harmonic wavelengths of Nd3+ (e.g. Nd3+:YAG or Nd3+:YVO4 having fundamental wavelength near 1064 nm and higher order harmonic wavelengths near 532 nm, 355 nm, and 266 nm). Other wavelengths in the ultraviolet, visible, and infrared portions of the spectrum that satisfy the combined linear absorption and scattering loss requirement for a given substrate material can also be used.
In operation, the pulsed laser beam 112 output by the beam source 110 may create multi-photon absorption (MPA) in the transparent workpiece 160. MPA is the simultaneous absorption of two or more photons of identical or different frequencies that excites a molecule from one state (usually the ground state) to a higher energy electronic state (i.e., ionization). The energy difference between the involved lower and upper states of the molecule is equal to the sum of the energies of the involved photons. MPA, also called induced absorption, can be a second-order or third-order process (or higher order), for example, that is several orders of magnitude weaker than linear absorption. It differs from linear absorption in that the strength of second-order induced absorption may be proportional to the square of the light intensity, for example, and thus it is a nonlinear optical process.
The perforation step that creates the contour line 170 may utilize the beam source 110 (e.g., an ultra-short pulse laser) in combination with the optics depicted and described below with respect to
Referring also to
In some of the exemplary embodiments of the beam source 110 described herein, the time separation Tb (
The burst repetition rate may be in a range of from about 1 kHz to about 2 MHz, such as from about 1 kHz to about 200 kHz. Bursting or producing pulse bursts 500 is a type of laser operation where the emission of pulses 500A is not in a uniform and steady stream but rather in tight clusters of pulse bursts 500. The pulse burst laser beam may have a wavelength selected based on the material of the transparent workpiece 160 being operated on such that the material of the transparent workpiece 160 is substantially transparent at the wavelength. The average laser power per burst measured at the material may be at least about 40 μJ per mm of thickness of material. For example, in embodiments, the average laser power per burst may be from about 40 μJ/mm to about 2500 μJ/mm, or from about 500 μJ/mm to about 2250 μJ/mm. In a specific example, for 0.5 mm to 0.7 mm thick Corning EAGLE XG® transparent workpiece, pulse bursts of from about 300 μJ to about 600 μJ may cut and/or separate the workpiece, which corresponds to an exemplary range of about 428 μJ/mm to about 1200 μJ/mm (i.e., 300 μJ/0.7 mm for 0.7 mm EAGLE XG® glass and 600 μJ/0.5 mm for a 0.5 mm EAGLE XG® glass).
The energy required to modify the transparent workpiece 160 may be described in terms of the burst energy (i.e., the energy contained within a pulse burst 500 where each pulse burst 500 contains a series of pulses 500A), or in terms of the energy contained within a single laser pulse (many of which may comprise a burst). The energy per pulse burst may be from about 25 μJ to about 750 μJ, e.g., from about 50 μJ to about 500 μJ, or from about 50 μJ to about 250 μJ. For some glass compositions, the energy per pulse burst may be from about 100 μJ to about 250 μJ. However, for display or TFT glass compositions, the energy per pulse burst may be higher (e.g., from about 300 μJ to about 500 μJ, or from about 400 μJ to about 600 μJ, depending on the specific glass composition of the transparent workpiece 160). The use of a pulsed laser beam 112 capable of generating such bursts is advantageous for cutting or modifying transparent materials, for example glass. In contrast with the use of single pulses spaced apart in time by the repetition rate of the single-pulsed laser, the use of a burst sequence that spreads the laser energy over a rapid sequence of pulses within the burst allows access to larger timescales of high intensity interaction with the material than is possible with single-pulse lasers.
Referring again to
In some embodiments, the aspheric optical element 122 comprises at least one aspheric surface whose shape is mathematically described as:
where z′ is the surface sag of the aspheric surface, r is the distance between the aspheric surface and the optical axis 102 in a radial direction (e.g., in an x-direction or a y-direction), c is the surface curvature of the aspheric surface (i.e. ci=1/Ri, where R is the surface radius of the aspheric surface), k is the conic constant, and coefficients ai are the first through the twelfth order aspheric coefficients or higher order aspheric coefficients (polynomial aspheres) describing the aspheric surface. In one example embodiment, at least one aspheric surface of the aspheric optical element 122 includes the following coefficients a1-a7, respectively: −0.085274788; 0.065748845; 0.077574995; −0.054148636; 0.022077021; −0.0054987472; 0.0006682955; and the aspheric coefficients a8-a12 are 0. In this embodiment, the at least one aspheric surface has the conic constant k=0. However, because the a1 coefficient has a nonzero value, this is equivalent to having a conic constant k with a non-zero value. Accordingly, an equivalent surface may be described by specifying a conic constant k that is non zero, a coefficient a1 that is non-zero, or a combination of a nonzero k and a non-zero coefficient a1. Further, in some embodiments, the at least one aspheric surface is described or defined by at least one higher order aspheric coefficients a2-a12 with non-zero value (i.e., at least one of a2, a3, a12≠0). In one example embodiment, the aspheric optical element 122 comprises a third-order aspheric optical element such as a cubically shaped optical element, which comprises a coefficient a3 that is non-zero.
In some embodiments, when the aspheric optical element 122 comprises an axicon, the axicon may have a laser output surface 126 (e.g., conical surface) having an angle of about 1.2°, such as from about 0.5° to about 5°, or from about 1° to about 1.5°, or even from about 0.5° to about 20°, the angle measured relative to the laser input surface 124 (e.g., flat surface) upon which the pulsed laser beam 112 enters the axicon lens. Further, the laser output surface 126 terminates at a conical tip. Moreover, the aspheric optical element 122 includes a centerline axis 125 extending from the laser input surface 124 to the laser output surface 126 and terminating at the conical tip. In other embodiments, the aspheric optical element 122 may comprise, a spatial phase modulator such as a spatial light modulator, or a diffractive optical grating. In operation, the aspheric optical element 122 shapes the incoming pulsed laser beam 112 (e.g., an incoming Gaussian beam) into a quasi-non-diffracting beam, which, in turn, is directed through the one or more lenses 130. Further, in some embodiments, the beam converting element 120 may be an annular aperture.
Referring still to
Referring now to
The relative offset between the first focusing lens 132 and the beam pathway 111 may be achieved by shifting the first focusing lens 132 along the X-Y plane, shifting the beam source 110 along the X-Y plane, or both. The magnitude of the offset required to sufficiently break the symmetry of the resulting cross-sectional phase contour 150 is a function of the optical layout of the optical assembly 100 and the focal length of the offset lens (e.g., the first focusing lens 132). While not intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that as the pulsed laser beam 112 propagates through the offset lens (e.g., the first focusing lens 132), different cross sectional portions of the pulsed laser beam 112 along the X-Y plane accumulate different additional phase to generate the one or more phase contour ridges 154. As an example, in an embodiment in which the offset lens (e.g., the first focusing lens 132) comprises a focal length of from about 30 microns to about 40 microns, the offset distance a may be from about 50 microns to about 500 microns. Further, other some embodiments, the offset distance a may comprise from about 10 microns to about 1 mm, for example, 20 microns, 50 microns, 100 microns, 250 microns, 500 microns or the like. In some embodiments, the offset distance a may be from about 20 microns to about 100 microns, or from about 50 microns to about 100 microns, or the like. In some embodiments, the offset distance a may comprise a distance from about 10 times to about 500 times a cross sectional diameter of the pulsed laser beam 112 at a contact location between the pulsed laser beam 112 and the first focusing lens 132. In some embodiments, the offset distance a may be a function of the wavelength of the pulsed laser beam 112, for example, the offset distance 1 may be from about 50 to 500 times the wavelength of the pulsed laser beam 112, for example 75 times, 100 time, 150 times, 200 times, 250 times, 300 times, 350 times, 400 times, 450 times, or the like.
By offsetting the first focusing lens 132 relative to the beam pathway 111, the resultant cross-sectional phase contour 150 of the phase shifted focal line 113 comprises the one or more phase contour ridges 154 extending along or approximately parallel to the phase ridge lines 151 (
Further, the cross section of the pulsed laser beam 112 may be rotated by translating the first focusing lens 132 (e.g., the offset lens) relative to the pulsed laser beam 112 about the beam pathway 111, for example, by translating the first focusing lens 132, translating the pulsed laser beam 112, or both. Further, in some embodiments, when translating the first focusing lens 132 relative to the pulsed laser beam 112 about the beam pathway 111, the offset distance a between the first focusing lens 132 and the beam pathway 111 may remain constant. In operation, translating the first focusing lens 132 relative to the pulsed laser beam 112 about the beam pathway 111 may change (e.g., rotate) the radially offset direction of the first focusing lens 132 (e.g., the offset lens), thereby changing (e.g., rotating) the phase ridge lines 151 of the phase contour ridges 154. Further, rotating the phase ridge lines 151 of the one or more phase contour ridges 154 may alter the direction of the radial arms 176 of a defect 172 formed in the transparent workpiece 160 such that the contour line 170 formed in the transparent workpiece 160 may comprise a curvature along the imaging surface 162 of the transparent workpiece 160.
Further, in one embodiment, the phase modifying optical element 140, for example, the first focusing lens 132 positioned offset relative to the beam pathway 111, does not alter the intensity profile of the resultant pulsed laser beam 112 and the resultant phase shifted focal line 113. As one example, in embodiments in which the pulsed laser beam 112 comprises an axisymmetric intensity profile (e.g., a circular intensity profile) before traversing the first focusing lens 132 (e.g., the offset lens), the pulsed laser beam 112 will maintain this axisymmetric intensity profile after traversing the first focusing lens 132 (e.g., the offset lens). As another example, in embodiments in which the pulsed laser beam 112 comprises a non-axisymmetric intensity profile (e.g., an elliptical intensity profile) before traversing the first focusing lens 132 (e.g., the offset lens), the pulsed laser beam 112 will maintain this non-axisymmetric intensity profile after traversing the first focusing lens 132 (e.g., the offset lens).
Referring now to
As depicted in
Referring still to
Referring again to
In some embodiments, the phase modifying optical element 140, for example, the one or more lenses 130 (e.g., the first focusing lens 132 and/or the second focusing lens 134) may focus the pulsed laser beam 112 into the phase shifted focal line 113. Moreover, the phase modifying optical element 140, for example, at least one of the one or more lenses 130 positioned offset along the beam pathway 111 (e.g., the first focusing lens 132 in the example depicted in
In operation, the position of phase shifted focal line 113 may be controlled by suitably positioning and/or aligning the pulsed laser beam 112 relative to the transparent workpiece 160 as well as by suitably selecting the parameters of the optical assembly 100. For example, the position of the phase shifted focal line 113 may be controlled along the Z-axis and about the Z-axis. Further, the phase shifted focal line 113 may have a length in a range of from about 0.1 mm to about 100 mm or in a range of from about 0.1 mm to about 10 mm. Various embodiments may be configured to have a phase shifted focal line 113 with a length 1 of about 0.1 mm, about 0.2 mm, about 0.3 mm, about 0.4 mm, about 0.5 mm, about 0.7 mm, about 1 mm, about 2 mm, about 3 mm, about 4 mm, or about 5 mm e.g., from about 0.5 mm to about 5 mm. In some embodiments, the phase shifted focal line may comprise a diameter (e.g., twice a radius at which beam intensity decreases to 1/e2) of from about 0.1 μm to about 250 μm, for example about 0.5 μm to about 0.25 μm, 1 μm to about 10 μm, or the like, such as about 0.1 μm, 0.5 μm, 1 μm, 2 μm, 3 μm, 4 μm, 5 μm, 6 μm, 7 μm, 8 μm, 9 μm, 10 μm, 20 μm, 25 μm, 50 μm, 100 μm, 200 μm, or the like. Moreover, the phase shifted focal line 113 may comprise a length to diameter aspect ratio of from about 1 to about 10,000 for example, about 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500, 750, 1000, 5000, or the like.
Referring still to
Beyond the perforation of a single transparent workpiece 160, the process may also be used to perforate stacks of transparent workpieces 160, such as stacks of sheets of glass, and may fully perforate glass stacks of up to a few mm total height with a single laser pass. A single glass stack can comprise of various glass types within the stack, for example one or more layers of soda-lime glass layered with one or more layers of Corning code 2318 glass. The glass stacks additionally may have air gaps in various locations. According to another embodiment, ductile layers such as adhesives may be disposed between the glass stacks. However, the pulsed laser process described herein will still, in a single pass, fully perforate both the upper and lower glass layers of such a stack.
Further, following the formation of the contour line 170 in the transparent workpiece 160, a stress inducing source, such as a mechanical or thermal source may be utilized to separate the transparent workpiece 160 along the contour line 170. According to embodiments, the thermal source, such as an infrared laser beam, may be used to create thermal stress and thereby separate the transparent workpiece 160 at the contour line 170. In some embodiments, an infrared laser may be used to initiate spontaneous separation and then the separation may be finished mechanically. Suitable infrared lasers to create thermal stress in glass would typically have wavelengths that are readily absorbed by glass, typically having wavelengths ranging from 1.2 microns to 13 microns, for example, a range of 4 microns to 12 microns. The infrared laser beam, such as a laser beam produced by a carbon dioxide laser (a “CO2 laser”), a carbon monoxide laser (a “CO laser”), a solid state laser, a laser diode, or combinations thereof, is a controlled heat source that rapidly increases the temperature of the transparent workpiece 160 at or near the contour line 170. This rapid heating may build compressive stress in the transparent workpiece 160 on or adjacent to the contour line 170. Since the area of the heated glass surface is relatively small compared to the overall surface area of the transparent workpiece 160, the heated area cools relatively rapidly. The resultant temperature gradient induces tensile stress in the transparent workpiece 160 sufficient to propagate a crack along the contour line 170 and through the thickness of the transparent workpiece 160, resulting in full separation of the transparent workpiece 160 along the contour line 170. Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the tensile stress may be caused by expansion of the glass (i.e., changed density) in portions of the workpiece with higher local temperature.
In view of the foregoing description, it should be understood that formation of a contour line comprising defects along a desired line of separation may be enhanced by utilizing a pulsed laser beam which is shaped by an optical assembly into a phase shifted focal line such that the phase shifted focal line irradiates the transparent workpiece along the desired line of separation.
Example 1 is an experimental result of a pulsed laser beam 112 propagated through the optical assembly 100 depicted in
Example 2 is an experimental result of a pulsed laser beam 112 propagated through the optical assembly 100 depicted in
Example 3 is an experimental result of a pulsed laser beam 112 propagated through the optical assembly 100 depicted in
Example 4 is an experimental result of a pulsed laser beam 112 propagated through the optical assembly 100 depicted in
Example 5 is an experimental result of a pulsed laser beam 112 propagated through the optical assembly 100 depicted in
Example 6 is an experimental result of a pulsed laser beam 112 propagated through the optical assembly 100 depicted in
Ranges can be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
Directional terms as used herein—for example up, down, right, left, front, back, top, bottom—are made only with reference to the figures as drawn and are not intended to imply absolute orientation.
Unless otherwise expressly stated, it is in no way intended that any method set forth herein be construed as requiring that its steps be performed in a specific order, nor that with any apparatus specific orientations be required. Accordingly, where a method claim does not actually recite an order to be followed by its steps, or that any apparatus claim does not actually recite an order or orientation to individual components, or it is not otherwise specifically stated in the claims or description that the steps are to be limited to a specific order, or that a specific order or orientation to components of an apparatus is not recited, it is in no way intended that an order or orientation be inferred, in any respect. This holds for any possible non-express basis for interpretation, including: matters of logic with respect to arrangement of steps, operational flow, order of components, or orientation of components; plain meaning derived from grammatical organization or punctuation, and; the number or type of embodiments described in the specification.
As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a” component includes aspects having two or more such components, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. Thus it is intended that the specification cover the modifications and variations of the various embodiments described herein provided such modification and variations come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/456,774 filed on Feb. 9, 2017 the content of which is relied upon and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1790397 | Woods et al. | Jan 1931 | A |
2682134 | Stookey | Jun 1954 | A |
2749794 | O'Leary | Jun 1956 | A |
3647410 | Heaton et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3695497 | Dear | Oct 1972 | A |
3695498 | Dear | Oct 1972 | A |
3729302 | Heaton | Apr 1973 | A |
3775084 | Heaton | Nov 1973 | A |
4226607 | Domken | Oct 1980 | A |
4441008 | Chan | Apr 1984 | A |
4546231 | Gresser et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4646308 | Kafka et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4764930 | Bille et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4891054 | Bricker et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4907586 | Bille et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4918751 | Pessot et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4929065 | Hagerty et al. | May 1990 | A |
5035918 | Vyas | Jul 1991 | A |
5040182 | Spinelli et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5104210 | Tokas | Apr 1992 | A |
5108857 | Kitayama et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112722 | Tsujino et al. | May 1992 | A |
5114834 | Nachshon | May 1992 | A |
5265107 | Delfyett | Nov 1993 | A |
5400350 | Galvanauskas et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5434875 | Rieger et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436925 | Lin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5553093 | Ramaswamy et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5574597 | Kataoka et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586138 | Yokayama | Dec 1996 | A |
5696782 | Harter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5736709 | Neiheisel | Apr 1998 | A |
6016223 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038055 | Hansch et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055829 | Witzmann et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078599 | Everage et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6156030 | Neev | Dec 2000 | A |
6160835 | Kwon | Dec 2000 | A |
6186384 | Sawada | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210401 | Lai | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256328 | Delfyett et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259512 | Mizouchi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272156 | Reed et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301932 | Allen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322958 | Hayashi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327875 | Allaire | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339208 | Rockstroh et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6373565 | Kafka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381391 | Islam et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396856 | Sucha et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6407360 | Choo et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438996 | Cuvelier | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445491 | Sucha et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6449301 | Wu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484052 | Visuri et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489589 | Alexander | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501578 | Bernstein et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6552301 | Herman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6573026 | Aitken et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592703 | Habeck et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6635849 | Okawa et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6720519 | Liu et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729161 | Miura et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744009 | Xuan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6787732 | Xuan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6800237 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6800831 | Hoetzel | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6958094 | Ohmi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6992026 | Fukuyo et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009138 | Amako et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7061583 | Mulkens et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7353829 | Wachter et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7361221 | Matsumura | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7511886 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7535634 | Savchenkov et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7626138 | Bovatsek | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633033 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7642483 | You et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7649153 | Haight et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7726532 | Gonoe | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8104385 | Hayashi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8118971 | Hori et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8132427 | Brown et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8168514 | Garner et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8245539 | Lu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245540 | Abramov et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8269138 | Garner et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8283595 | Fukuyo et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292141 | Cox et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296066 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8327666 | Harvey et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8341976 | Dejneka et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8347651 | Abramov et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358888 | Ramachandran | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8444906 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448471 | Kumatani et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8518280 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8549881 | Brown et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8584354 | Cornejo et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8584490 | Garner et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8592716 | Abramov et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8604380 | Howerton et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8607590 | Glaesemann et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8616024 | Cornejo et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8635887 | Black et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8680489 | Martinez et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685838 | Fukuyo et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8697228 | Carre et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8720228 | Li | May 2014 | B2 |
8826696 | Brown et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852698 | Fukumitsu | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8887529 | Lu et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8943855 | Gomez et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8951889 | Ryu et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971053 | Kariya et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9138913 | Arai et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9227868 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9290407 | Barefoot et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9296066 | Hosseini et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9324791 | Tamemoto | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9327381 | Lee et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9446590 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9481598 | Bergh | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9701581 | Kangastupa et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9902016 | Kawaguchi | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9914183 | Kawaguchi | Mar 2018 | B2 |
20020046997 | Nam et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020082466 | Han | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020097486 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020110639 | Bruns | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030006221 | Hong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040021615 | Postupack et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050098548 | Kobayashi | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115938 | Sawaki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050274702 | Deshi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011593 | Fukuyo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060028728 | Li | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060091283 | Acker | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109874 | Shiozaki et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060127679 | Gulati et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060227440 | Glukstad | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060289410 | Morita et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070111390 | Komura et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111480 | Maruyama et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119831 | Kandt | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132977 | Komatsuda | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138151 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070177116 | Amako | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202619 | Tamura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070298529 | Maeda et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080000884 | Sugiura et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080099444 | Misawa et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090013724 | Koyo et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090176034 | Ruuttu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183764 | Meyer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090250446 | Sakamoto | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090294419 | Abramov et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090294422 | Lubatschowski et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324899 | Feinstein et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100029460 | Shojiya et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032087 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100086741 | Bovatsek et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089631 | Sakaguchi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089882 | Tamura | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100102042 | Garner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100129603 | Blick et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100147813 | Lei et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100252540 | Lei et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100252959 | Lei et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276505 | Smith | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100279067 | Sabia et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287991 | Brown et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100320179 | Morita et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326138 | Kumatani et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110049765 | Lei et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088324 | Wessel | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100401 | Fiorentini | May 2011 | A1 |
20110132881 | Liu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110183116 | Hung et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110240611 | Sandstrom et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277507 | Lu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110318555 | Bookbinder et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017642 | Teranishi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120047951 | Dannoux et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120048604 | Cornejo et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061440 | Roell | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120064306 | Kang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120103018 | Lu et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131962 | Mitsugi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135195 | Glaesemann et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135607 | Shimoi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135608 | Shimoi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120145331 | Gomez et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120196071 | Cornejo et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120205356 | Pluss | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234049 | Bolton | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120234807 | Sercel et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255935 | Kakui et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120299219 | Shimoi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302139 | Darcangelo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130019637 | Sol et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034688 | Koike et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044371 | Rupp et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130068736 | Mielke et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075480 | Yokogi et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130091897 | Fujii et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130122264 | Fujii et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126573 | Hosseini et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130129947 | Harvey et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133367 | Abramov et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130216573 | Hosseini et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130143416 | Norval | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130149434 | Oh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130149494 | Koike et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167590 | Teranishi et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130174607 | Wootton et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130174610 | Teranishi et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130180285 | Kariya | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130189806 | Hoshino | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130209731 | Nattermann et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130220982 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130221053 | Zhang | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130224439 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228918 | Chen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247615 | Boek et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130266757 | Giron et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270240 | Kondo | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130280495 | Matsumoto | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130288010 | Akarapu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130291598 | Saito et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130312460 | Kunishi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130323469 | Abramov | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130334185 | Nomaru | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130340480 | Nattermann et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140027951 | Srinivas et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140034730 | Lee | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140042202 | Lee | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047957 | Wu | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140102146 | Saito et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110040 | Cok | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140113797 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140133119 | Kariya et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141217 | Gulati et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140147623 | Shorey et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140147624 | Streltsov et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140165652 | Saito | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174131 | Saito et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140199519 | Schillinger et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140216108 | Wiegel et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140290310 | Green | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320947 | Egerton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140333929 | Sung et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140361463 | Desimone et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150034612 | Hosseini et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150038313 | Hosseini | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150075221 | Kawaguchi et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150075222 | Mader | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150110442 | Zimmel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150118522 | Hosseini | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150136743 | Hosseini | May 2015 | A1 |
20150140241 | Hosseini | May 2015 | A1 |
20150140735 | Hosseini | May 2015 | A1 |
20150151380 | Hosseini | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150158120 | Courvoisier et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150165548 | Marjanovic | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150165560 | Hackert et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150165562 | Marjanovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150165563 | Manley et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150166391 | Marjanovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150166393 | Marjanovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150166394 | Marjanovic | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150166395 | Marjanovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150166396 | Marjanovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150166397 | Marjanovic et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150183679 | Saito | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150232369 | Marjanovic et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150299018 | Bhuyan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150367442 | Bovatsek et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008927 | Grundmueller et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160009066 | Neiber et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160023922 | Addiego et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160031745 | Ortner et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160060156 | Krueger et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160168396 | Letocart et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160280580 | Bohme | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160290791 | Buono et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170169847 | Tamaki | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180118603 | Nieber | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2388062 | Jul 2000 | CN |
1283409 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101386466 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101502914 | Aug 2009 | CN |
201357287 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101637849 | Feb 2010 | CN |
201471092 | May 2010 | CN |
102060437 | May 2011 | CN |
102248302 | Nov 2011 | CN |
102343631 | Feb 2012 | CN |
102649199 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102672355 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102898014 | Jan 2013 | CN |
102916081 | Feb 2013 | CN |
102923939 | Feb 2013 | CN |
103013374 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103143841 | Jun 2013 | CN |
203021443 | Jun 2013 | CN |
103273195 | Sep 2013 | CN |
103316990 | Sep 2013 | CN |
103359947 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103359948 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103531414 | Jan 2014 | CN |
10346027 | Apr 2014 | CN |
203509350 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104344202 | Feb 2015 | CN |
2231330 | Jan 1974 | DE |
10200635555 | Jan 2008 | DE |
102012010635 | Nov 2013 | DE |
102013223637 | May 2015 | DE |
0270897 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0609978 | Aug 1994 | EP |
1159104 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2202545 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2783784 | Oct 2014 | EP |
298294 | Oct 2013 | FR |
1242172 | Aug 1971 | GB |
1179770 | Jul 1989 | JP |
6318756 | Nov 1994 | JP |
09106243 | Apr 1997 | JP |
11269683 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11347758 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2001138083 | May 2001 | JP |
2002228818 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003062756 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003114400 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003154517 | May 2003 | JP |
2003238178 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004209675 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005104819 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005205440 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005288503 | Oct 2005 | JP |
3775250 | May 2006 | JP |
2006130691 | May 2006 | JP |
2006248885 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007021548 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007253203 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2010046761 | Mar 2010 | JP |
04592855 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011049398 | Mar 2011 | JP |
04672689 | Apr 2011 | JP |
04880820 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012024782 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012031018 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012159749 | Aug 2012 | JP |
2012187618 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2013007842 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013031879 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013043808 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2013075802 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2013091578 | May 2013 | JP |
05274085 | Aug 2013 | JP |
05300544 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2013187247 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2013203630 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2013203631 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2013223886 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2009057161 | Jun 2009 | KR |
1020621 | Mar 2011 | KR |
2012015366 | Feb 2012 | KR |
2012074508 | Jul 2012 | KR |
2013031380 | Mar 2013 | KR |
1269474 | May 2013 | KR |
2013124646 | Nov 2013 | KR |
1344368 | Dec 2013 | KR |
2014022980 | Feb 2014 | KR |
2014022981 | Feb 2014 | KR |
1020140064220 | May 2014 | KR |
201226345 | Jul 2012 | TW |
1999029243 | Jun 1999 | WO |
1999063900 | Dec 1999 | WO |
2004110693 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2006073098 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007094160 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008080182 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2008128612 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009114375 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010035736 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2011056781 | May 2011 | WO |
2012006736 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012166753 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012108052 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2013022148 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013043173 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013138802 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013150990 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2013153195 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014064492 | May 2014 | WO |
2014079478 | May 2014 | WO |
2014079570 | May 2014 | WO |
2015127583 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016005455 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016010954 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016154284 | Sep 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“What is the difference between Ra and RMS?”; Harrison Electropolishing LP; (http://www.harrisonep.com/electropolishingra.html), Accessed Aug. 8, 2016. |
“EagleEtch” Product Brochure, EuropeTec USA Inc., pp. 1-8, Aug. 1, 2014. |
“PHAROS High-power femtosecond laser system” product brochure; Light Conversion, Vilnius, LT; Apr. 18, 2011, pp. 1-2. |
“TruMicro 5000” Product Manual, Trumpf Laser GmbH + Co. KG, pp. 1-4, Aug. 2011. |
Abakians et al.“Evaporative Cutting of a Semitransparent Body With a Moving CW Laser”, J. Heat Transfer 110(4a), 924-930 (Nov. 1, 1988) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3250594. |
Abramov et al., “Laser separation of chemically strengthened glass”; Physics Procedia 5 (2010) 285-290, Elsevier,; doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.054. |
Ahmed et al. “Display glass cutting by femtosecond laser induced single shot periodic void array” Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Proccessing vol. 93 No. 1 (2008) pp. 189-192. |
Arimoto et al., “Imaging properties of axicon in a scanning optical system”; Applied Optics, Nov. 1, 1992, vol. 31, No. 31, pp. 6653-6657. |
Bagchi et al. “Fast ion beams from intense, femtosecond laser irradiated nanostructured surfaces” Applied Physics B 88 (2007) p. 167-173. |
Bhuyan et al. “Laser micro- and nanostructuring using femtosecond Bessel beams”, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 199 (2011) p. 101-110. |
Bhuyan et al. “Single shot high aspect ratio bulk nanostructuring of fused silica using chirp-controlled ultrafast laser Bessel beams” Applied Physics Letters 104 (2014) 021107. |
Bhuyan et al. “Ultrafast Bessel beams for high aspect ratio taper free micromachining of glass” Proc. of SPIE vol. 7728 77281V-1. |
Bhuyan et al., “Femtosecond non-diffracting Bessel beams and controlled nanoscale ablation” by IEEE (2011). |
Bhuyan et al., “High aspect ratio nanochannel machining using single shot femtosecond Bessel beams”; Applied Physics Letters 97, 081102 (2010); doi: 10.1063/1.3479419. |
Bhuyan et al., “High aspect ratio taper-free microchannel fabrication using femtosecond Bessel beams”; Optics Express (2010) vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 566-574. |
Case Design Guidelines for Apple Devices Release R5 (https://web.archive.org/web/20131006050442/https://developer.apple.com/resources/cases/Case-Design-Guidelines.pdf ; archived on Oct. 6, 2013). |
Chiao et al. 9. “Self-trapping of optical beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 13, Num. 15, p. 479 (1964). |
Corning Inc., “Corning® 1737 AM LCD Glass Substrates Material Information”, issued Aug. 2002. |
Corning Inc., “Corning® Eagle2000 TM AMLCD Glass Substrates Material Information”, issued Apr. 2005. |
Couairon et al. “Femtosecond filamentation in transparent media” Physics Reports 441 (2007) pp. 47-189. |
Courvoisier et al. “Applications of femtosecond Bessel beams to laser ablation” Applied Physics A (2013) 112, p. 29-34. |
Courvoisier et al. “Surface nanoprocessing with non-diffracting femtosecond Bessel beams” Optics Letters vol. 34 No. 20, (2009) p. 3163-3165. |
Cubeddu et al., “A compact time-resolved reflectance system for dual-wavelength multichannel assessment of tissue absorption and scattering”; Part of the SPIE Conference on Optical Tomography and Spectroscopy of Tissue III, San Jose, CA (Jan. 1999), SPIE vol. 3597, 0277-786X/99, pp. 450-455. |
Cubeddu et al., “Compact tissue oximeter based on dual-wavelength multichannel time-resolved reflectance”; Applied Optics, vol. 38, No. 16, Jun. 1, 1999, pp. 3670-3680. |
Ding et al., “High-resolution optical coherence tomography over a large depth range with an axicon lens”; Optic Letters, vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 243-245, Feb. 15, 2002, Optical Society of America. |
Dong et al. “On-axis irradiance distribution of axicons illuminated by spherical wave”, Optics & Laser Technology 39 (2007) 1258-1261. |
Duocastella et al. “Bessel and annular beams for material processing”, Laser Photonics Rev. 6, 607-621, 2012. |
Durnin. “Exact solutions for nondiffracting beams I. The scaler theory” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 4(4) pp. 651-654. |
Eaton et al. “Heat accumulation effects in femtosecond laser written waveguides with variable repetition rates”, Opt. Exp. 5280, vol. 14, No. 23, Jun. 2006. |
Gattass et al. “Micromachining of bulk glass with bursts of femtosecond laser pulses at variable repetition rates” Opt. Exp. 5280, vol. 14, No. 23, Jun. 2006. |
Girkin et al., “Macroscopic multiphoton biomedical imaging using semiconductor saturable Bragg reflector modelocked Lasers”; Part of the SPIE Conference on Commercial and Biomedical Applications of Ultrafast Lasers, San Jose, CA (Jan. 1999), SPIE vol. 3616, 0277-786X/99, pp. 92-98. |
Glezer et al., “Ultrafast-laser driven micro-explosions in transparent materials”; Applied Physics Letters, vol. 71 (1997), pp. 882-884. |
Golub, I., “Fresnel axicon”; Optic Letters, vol. 31, No. 12, Jun. 15, 2006, Optical Society of America, pp. 1890-1892. |
Gori et al. “Analytical derivation of the optimum triplicator” Optics Communications 157 (1998) pp. 13-16. |
Herman et al., “Laser micromachining of ‘transparent’ fused silica with 1-ps. pulses and pulse trains”; Part of the SPIE Conference on Commercial and Biomedical Applications of Ultrafast Lasers, San Jose, CA (Jan. 1999), SPIE vol. 3616, 0277-786X/99, pp. 148-155. |
Honda et al. “A Novel Polymer Film that Controls Light Transmission”, Progress in Pacific Polymer Science 3, 159-169 (1994). |
http://www.gtat.com/Collateral/Documents/English-US/Sapphire/12-21-12_GT_TouchScreen_V3_web.pdf. |
Hu et al. “5-axis laser cutting interference detection and correction based on STL model” (2009) Zhongguo Jiguang/Chinese Journal of Lasers, 36 (12), pp. 3313-3317. |
Huang et al., “Laser etching of glass substrates by 1064 nm laser irradiation”, Applied Physics, Oct. 2008, vol. 93, Issue 1, pp. 159-162. |
Juodkazis S. et al. Laser induced microexplosion confined in the bulk of a sapphire crystal: evidence of multimegabar pressures., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 166101, 2006. |
Karlsson et al. “The technology of chemical glass strengthening—a review” Glass Technol: Eur. J. Glass Sci. Technol. A (2010) 51 (2) pp. 41-54. |
Kosareva et al., “Formation of extended plasma channels in a condensed medium upon axicon focusing of a femtosecond laser pulse”; Quantum Electronics 35 (11) 1013-1014 (2005), Kvantovaya Elektronika and Turpion Ltd.; doi: 10.1070/QE2005v035n11ABEH013031. |
Kruger et al., “Femtosecond-pulse visible laser processing of transparent materials”; Applied Surface Science 96-98 (1996) 430-438. |
Kruger et al., “Laser micromachining of barium aluminium borosilicate glass with pluse durations between 20 fs and 3 ps”; Applied Surface Science 127-129 (1998) 892-898. |
Kruger et al., “Structuring of dielectric and metallic materials with ultrashort laser pulses between 20 fs and 3 ps”; SPIE vol. 2991, 0277-786X/97, pp. 40-47. |
Lapczyna et al., “Ultra high repetition rate (133 MHz) laser ablation of aluminum with 1.2-ps pulses”; Applied Physics A 69 [Suppl.], S883-S886, Springer-Verlag (1999); doi: 10.1007/s003399900300. |
Levy et al. “Design, fabrication, and characterization of circular Dammann gratings based on grayscale lithography,” Opt. Lett vol. 35, No. 6, p. 880-882 (2010). |
Liu X et al. “laser ablation and micromachining with ultrashort laser pulses”, IEEE J. Quantum Electronics, 22, 1706-1716, 1997. |
Maeda et al, “Optical performance of angle-dependent light-control glass”, Proc. SPIE 1536, Optical Materials Technology for Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy Conversion X, 138 (Dec. 1, 1991). |
Mbise et al. “Angular selective window coatings: theory and experiments” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 30 2103 (1997). |
McGloin et al.“Bessel beams: diffraction in a new light” Contemporary Physics, vol. 46 No. 1 (2005) pp. 15-28. |
Merola et al. “Characterization of Bessel beams generated by polymeric microaxicons” Meas. Sci. Technol. 23 (2012) 10 pgs. |
Mirkhalaf, M. et al., Overcoming the brittleness of glass through bio-inspiration and micro-achitecture, Nature Communications, 5:3166/ncomm4166(2014). |
Perry et al., “Ultrashort-pulse laser machining of dielectric materials”; Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 85, No. 9, May 1, 1999, American Institute of Physics, pp. 6803-6810. |
Perry et al., “Ultrashort-pulse laser machining”; UCRL-ID-132159, Sep. 1998, pp. 1-38. |
Perry et al., “Ultrashort-pulse laser machining”; UCRL-JC-132159 Rev 1., Jan. 22, 1999, pp. 1-24. |
Polynkin et al., “Extended filamentation with temporally chirped femtosecond Bessel-Gauss beams in air”; Optics Express, vol. 17, No. 2, Jan. 19, 2009, OSA, pp. 575-584. |
Romero et al. “Theory of optimal beam splitting by phase gratings. II. Square and hexagonal gratings” J. Opt. Soc. A/vol. 24 No. 8 (2007) pp. 2296-2312. |
Salleo A et al., Machining of transparent materials using IR and UV nanosecond laser pulses, Appl. Physics A 71, 601-608, 2000. |
Serafetinides et al., “Polymer ablation by ultra-short pulsed lasers” Proceedings of SPIE vol. 3885 (2000) http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/. |
Serafetinides et al., “Ultra-short pulsed laser ablation of polymers”; Applied Surface Science 180 (2001) 42-56. |
Shah et al. “Micromachining with a high repetition rate femtosecond fiber laser”, Journal of Laser Micro/Nanoengineering vol. 3 No. 3 (2008) pp. 157-162. |
Shealy et al. “Geometric optics-based design of laser beam shapers”,Opt. Eng. 42(11), 3123-3138 (2003). doi:10.1117/1.1617311. |
Stoian et al. “Spatial and temporal laser pulse design for material processing on ultrafast scales” Applied Physics A (2014) 114, p. 119-127. |
Sundaram et al., “Inducing and probing non-thermal transitions in semiconductors using femtosecond laser pulses”; Nature Miracles, vol. 1, Dec. 2002, Nature Publishing Group (2002), pp. 217-224. |
Thiele, “Relation between catalytic activity and size of particle” Industrial and Egineering Chemistry, vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 916-920. |
Toytman et al. “Optical breakdown in transparent media with adjustable axial length and location”, Optics Express vol. 18 No. 24, 24688-24698 (2010). |
Vanagas et al., “Glass cutting by femtosecond pulsed irradiation”; J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS. 3(2), 358-363 (Apr. 1, 2004); doi: 10.1117/1.1668274. |
Varel et al., “Micromachining of quartz with ultrashort laser pulses”; Applied Physics A 65, 367-373, Springer-Verlag (1997). |
Velpula et al.. “Ultrafast imaging of free carriers: controlled excitation with chirped ultrafast laser Bessel beams”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 8967 896711-1 (2014). |
Wang et al, “Investigation on CO2 laser irradiation inducing glass strip peeling for microchannel formation”, Biomicrofluidics 6, 012820 (2012). |
Wu et al. “Optimal orientation of the cutting head for enhancing smoothness movement in three-dimensional laser cutting” (2013) Zhongguo Jiguang/Chinese Journal of Lasers, 40 (1), art. No. 0103005. |
Xu et al. “Optimization of 3D laser cutting head orientation based on the minimum energy consumption” (2014) International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 74 (9-12), pp. 1283-1291. |
Yan et al. “Fiber structure to convert a Gaussian beam to higher-order optical orbital angular momentum modes” Optics Letters vol. 37 No. 16 (2012) pp. 3294-3296. |
Yoshino et al., “Micromachining with a high repetition rate femtosecond fiber laser”; JLMN—Journal of Laser Micro/Nanoengineering vol. 3, No. 3 (2008), pp. 157-162. |
Zeng et al. “Characteristic analysis of a refractive axicon system for optical trepanning”; Optical Engineering 45(9), 094302 (Sep. 2006), pp. 094302-1-094302-10. |
Zhang et al., “Design of diffractive-phase axicon illuminated by a Gaussian-profile beam”; Acta Physica Sinica (overseas edition), vol. 5, No. 5 (May 1996) Chin. Phys. Soc., 1004-423X/96/05050354-11, pp. 354-364. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180221988 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62456774 | Feb 2017 | US |