Embodiments of the present invention are directed to methods and apparatus for dental confocal imaging, such as for measuring surface topology of teeth.
In the fields of orthodontics and prosthodontics, different methods are known to determine a current teeth topology in a patient's mouth. One of the methods involves taking an impression of a patient's dentition. Using this impression, a plaster cast is made, representing a (positive) physical teeth model. This physical teeth model may then be used for a subsequent treatment plan.
If CAD (computer-aided design) and/or CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) techniques are to be employed, a digital dataset corresponding to the teeth may be obtained by scanning. For example, the (positive) physical teeth model in form of the plaster cast or a (negative) physical teeth model in form of the impression may be scanned or imaged using x-rays, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or laser scanning apparatuses. With the thus obtained image data, a computer model of the teeth or a part thereof may be established. However, such methods and apparatus can be somewhat time consuming and more expensive than would be ideal.
As an alternative, teeth in a patient's mouth may be imaged directly. For this purpose, different imaging apparatuses are known.
The prior apparatus for non-contact imaging with a probe having a sensing face have been less than ideal in at least some respects. The prior probe devices can be somewhat larger than would be ideal, and may have a large intraoral front tip which can make the prior devices somewhat cumbersome to use in at least some instances. Although an array of incident light beams passing through focusing optics can be used, the larger than ideal probe heads of such devices can provide less than ideal measurements of the oral cavity of a patient. Also, the prior devices that rely on beams to generate illuminated spots on the structure and the intensity of returning light rays propagating along an optical path can be somewhat cumbersome to use and maintain and can be somewhat more costly to manufacture than would be ideal.
Although three-dimensional (3D) data acquisition using triangulation has been proposed, such devices can be less compact than would be ideal and can be somewhat difficult to place in the mouth of the patient. Also, such devices can require alignment and can be less accurate and reliable than would be ideal in at least some instances.
In light of the above, improved methods and apparatus for measuring surfaces such as the intraoral cavity are needed. Ideally such methods and apparatus will overcome at least some of the deficiencies of the prior methods and apparatus and be more accurate, reliable, compact, easier to use with the patient's mouth and less costly than the prior devices.
In accordance with embodiments, an apparatus for confocal imaging is provided, which may comprise an illumination module for generating an array of light beams, an optics system for confocal focusing of the array of light beams, and a probe head with a light-guiding part having an entrance face and an exit face. The illumination module, the optics system, and the probe head can be arranged such that the array of light beams from the illumination module passes through the optics system, enters the light-guiding part via the entrance face, and exits the light-guiding part via the exit face. Embodiments disclosed herein provide probes having decreased size which can facilitate measurement of surfaces which can be difficult to reach with prior devices such as an oral cavity of a patient. The embodiments disclosed herein also have the advantage of providing improved accuracy and reliability with decreased manufacturing costs. In many embodiments, a plurality of beams is directed toward a measurement surface in which each of the plurality of beams extends to a focal point and comprises a chief ray. The chief rays of the plurality of beams can diverge from each other between the probe and the focal points in order to decrease the size of the probe and inhibit spread of the outermost marginal rays. In many embodiments, the confocal imaging system comprises a non-telecentric configuration such that the off-axis chief ray angles of the light beams exiting the probe have an opposite orientation with respect to angles of the marginal rays entering the probe, such that a substantially decreased cross-sectional size of the probe can be provided. In many embodiments, laterally outermost marginal rays of each of the outer beams on either side of the optical axis extend along an optical path substantially parallel to the optical axis and substantially parallel to the optical axis, or divergent from the optical axis. In many embodiments, lateral spread of the array of beams is inhibited as each individual beam converges toward the focal point, and this spread can be inhibited when the focal point is shifted.
In a first aspect, embodiments provide an apparatus for confocal imaging, comprising an illumination module for generating an array of light beams, an optics system for confocal focusing of the array of light beams and a probe head with a light-guiding part having an entrance face and an exit face. The illumination module, the optics system and the probe head are arranged such that the array of light beams from the illumination module passes through the optics system, enters the light-guiding part via the entrance face and exits the light-guiding part via the exit face. The optics system is configured such that, after having passed through the optics system, the outermost marginal rays of the outermost light beams with respect to the optical axis of the optics system are parallel or divergent to the optical axis.
In another aspect, embodiments provide an apparatus for confocal imaging comprising an illumination module for generating an array of light beams, an optics system for confocal focusing of the array of light beams and a probe head with a light-guiding part having an entrance face and an exit face. The illumination module, the optics system and the probe head are arranged such that chief rays of the array of light beams are divergent to each other.
In another aspect, embodiments provide a method for confocal imaging. An illumination module is provided for generating an array of light beams. An optics system is provided for confocal focusing of the array of light beams and a probe head with a light-guiding part having an optical axis and an entrance face and an exit face. The optics system is configured such that, after having passed through the optics system, outermost marginal rays of outermost light beams with respect to the optical axis are parallel or divergent with respect to the optical axis between the probe and focal points of the light beams.
All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
The methods and apparatus disclosed herein can be combined in one or more of many ways and are well suited for combination with many devices related to surface topology such as the measurement of tissue surfaces such as surfaces of the oral cavity. The tissue surfaces may comprise one or more surfaces of teeth of the mouth, for example. The measured surfaces can be used by health care providers such as orthodontists and dentists.
In many embodiments, the optics system can be configured such that, after having passed through the optics system, the outermost marginal rays of the outermost light beams with respect to the optical axis of the optics system are parallel or divergent to the optical axis. In many embodiments, a plurality of light beams exits the probe head with divergent angles. Each of the plurality of light beams may comprise a chief ray divergent from an optical axis of the optics system.
In many embodiments, the outermost marginal rays of the outermost light beams, after exiting the optics system, do not converge towards the optical axis, in order to avoid a lateral spread of the array of beams even when shifting the focal plane of the focusing optics. In many embodiments, the term “outermost” refers to a distance transverse to the optical axis, such as a distance perpendicular to the optical axis. In many embodiments, an outermost light beam or most off-axis light beam comprises a beam having a largest distance to the optical axis in a direction perpendicular thereto.
The apparatus may be configured for intraoral confocal imaging, such as an apparatus for intraoral confocal imaging, which can be used for confocal imaging of positive and/or negative physical teeth models. The apparatus may comprise a scanning apparatus. The focusing optics of the apparatus may comprise non-telecentric optics, such that a reduced ray footprint at the probe head entrance face can be provided.
In many embodiments, the outermost marginal rays of the outermost light beams, after having passed through the optics system, are divergent with respect to the optical axis, and the divergence angle between the outermost marginal rays and the optical axis may be at most 10°, in some embodiments at most 8°, and in specific embodiments at most 5°.
In many embodiments, the light-guiding part comprises a transparent body. The transparent body may comprise one or more of glass or plastics, and may comprise a stiff, solid body, such as a rigid body.
The light-guiding part may be arranged such that the array of light beams enters the light-guiding part at an angle of approximately 90° with respect to the entrance face. In some embodiments, the light guiding part may be arranged such that the array of light beams enters via the entrance face at an angle of 90°±10°, such as 90°±8°, and more particularly of 90°±5°.
The light-guiding part may be bounded by sidewalls, and the sidewalls of the light-guiding part and entrance face may be arranged such that each light beam entering the light-guiding part via the entrance face is reflected at the sidewalls an odd number of times before exiting via the exit face. In many embodiments, each light beam may be reflected at the sidewalls three or five times before exiting via the exit face. Each of the sidewalls and/or the exit face and/or the entrance face may be planar.
The light-guiding part may be configured with an index of refraction and arrangement of the entrance face and sidewalls such that each light beam entering via the entrance face is reflected from at least one of the sidewalls of the light-guiding part by way of internal reflection. In many embodiments, at least some of the reflections at the sidewalls result from internal reflection such as one or more of total internal reflection, attenuated total internal reflection, or frustrated total internal reflection. Alternatively or additionally, at least some reflections may be provided with a minor coating on a sidewall or part of a sidewall.
In many embodiments, the light-guiding part comprises a one-piece body.
In many embodiments, the light-guiding part comprises an upper sidewall being arranged at an acute angle with respect to the entrance face, a lower sidewall being arranged at an obtuse angle with respect to the entrance face, and an end sidewall being arranged at an acute angle with respect to the entrance face and/or the exit face. The upper sidewall may adjoin the entrance face; the lower sidewall may adjoin the entrance face and/or the end sidewall may adjoin the upper sidewall and/or the lower sidewall. The angle between the end sidewall and the upper sidewall may be an obtuse angle. The lower sidewall may comprise the exit face.
In many embodiments, the end sidewall may comprise a mirror. For example, the end sidewall may comprise a mirror coating. In such embodiments, the light-guiding part may be arranged and/or configured such that each light beam entering via the entrance face is reflected at all (remaining) sidewalls except for the end sidewall by way of internal reflection.
The angle between the entrance face and the lower sidewall may lie between 90° and 125°, in particular, between 90° and 115°. The angle between the exit face or the lower sidewall and the end sidewall may lie between 20° and 45°, in particular, between 25° and 35°. The angle between the entrance face and the upper sidewall may lie between 90° and 65°, in particular, between 90° and 80°.
The exit face may be covered by a transparent cover plate. The transparent cover plate may be a glass or plastics plate. The cover plate may be arranged at a distance from the exit face.
In many embodiments, the illumination module comprises a single light emitter or a plurality of light emitters. The one or more light emitters may emit coherent light. The light emitter may comprise one or a plurality of laser emitters. In embodiments comprising a single light emitter, the illumination module may further comprise a beam-expander element and/or a beam-splitter element for splitting a light beam from the light emitter into a plurality of light beams and/or an array of light beams. The beam-splitter element may comprise diffractive optics or a refractive optics, such as a grating or a microlens array.
Any of the above-described apparatuses may comprise a polarizer for linearly polarizing a light beam, wherein the polarizer is arranged along the optical path between the illumination module and the probe head, in particular, between the illumination module and the optics system.
Any of the above-described apparatuses may comprise a beam splitter being arranged along the optical path between the illumination module and the optics system such that the array of light beams from the illumination module passes through the beam splitter and an array of returning light beams from the optics module is reflected, in particular, towards a detector. The beam splitter may comprise a semi-transparent minor. The light beams from the illumination module passing through the optics system may comprise incident light beams, and light beams following the optical path in an opposite direction through the optics system may comprise returning light beams. The array of returning light beams may comprise an array of light beams having been reflected by an object to be imaged, such as teeth portions, for example.
The described apparatuses may further comprise a detector for detecting an array of returning light beams. The detector may comprise an array of detector elements. The detector elements may comprise a CCD camera or a photodiode array. The detector may comprise a spectrophotometer.
The above-described apparatuses may comprise a focus-shifting mechanism for shifting the focal plane of the optics system. For example, the focus-shifting mechanism may be configured to shift one or more lenses of the optics system along the optical axis. In many embodiments, the focus-shifting mechanism may comprise a translation mechanism for translating the one or more lenses of the optics system.
In many embodiments, the probe heads comprise a housing, wherein the light guiding part and/or the optics system are provided within the housing. In embodiments where a focus-shifting mechanism is provided, the focus shifting mechanism may also be provided within the housing.
In many embodiments, the probe head comprises a part of a handheld device. The optics system and/or a focus-shifting mechanism may comprise part of the handheld device, for example. In particular, the handheld device may be defined by the housing described above.
Further features will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in accordance with embodiments.
As used herein, a chief ray encompasses a central ray of a beam of light. In many embodiments, a plurality of beams is directed onto the surface to be measured, in which each of the plurality of beams comprises a chief ray.
The illustrated apparatus comprises a light emitter 1 as a source of coherent light. As an example, the light emitter may be a laser source such as a semiconductor laser.
As indicated by the arrow shown, emitted light passes through a beam expander 2, which may comprise a collimating lens so as to obtain a collimated light beam having a desired width or numerical aperture.
Along the optical path between the light emitter 1 and the beam expander 2, optionally, a polarizer such as a polarization filter may be provided.
The beam expander 2 is followed by a spot array generator element 3 for splitting the beam into an array of light beams. The spot array generator element 3 in the form of diffraction or refraction optics may comprise a grating or a microlens array, for example.
In the illustrated example, the light emitter comprises a single light source from which the array of light beams is generated via the beam expander and the beam splitter element. As an alternative, the light emitter 1 may already comprise a plurality of light sources being arranged in form of an array. In this case, the array of light beams is generated directly at the light emitter 1 so that a beam expander and/or beam splitter may be avoided. As an example, the array of light sources may be provided in the form of an array of laser sources such as semiconductor lasers.
In this example, the light emitter 1, the beam expander 2 and the spot array generator element 3 define an illumination module generating an array of light beams.
The array of light beams, represented here, for ease of illustration, by a single line, passes through a beam splitter 4 in form of a semi-transparent mirror and enters optics system 5. The optics system 5 comprises a non-telecentric, confocal lens arrangement which will be described in more detail below.
The light beams coming from the light emitter 1 and propagating towards the sample to be imaged (e.g. a teeth segment) are called incident light beams, whereas light beams being reflected at the sample and propagating along the optical path of the incident light beams but in opposite direction are called returning light beams.
After the optics system 5, the incident array of light beams enters a probe head 6. In particular, the array of light beams is coupled into a light guiding part of the probe head via the light guiding part's entrance face. Within the light guiding part, each beam is reflected several times before it is coupled out via an exit face onto an object to be imaged, such as a teeth segment 7. In this way, an incident array of light beams is emitted towards the teeth segment 7, thus, resulting in an array of light spots on the teeth surface.
As also illustrated by one of the arrows between a tooth and the probe head, reflected light re-enters the probe head 6, particularly its light guiding part via the exit face. In this way, each reflected or returning light beam travels along the optical path in opposite direction as travelled by the incident light beams. Therefore, the returning light beams are also reflected several times within the light guiding part of probe head 6 and pass through optics system 5 in an inverse direction. At the semi-transparent minor 4, the returned light beams are reflected towards imaging optics 8 comprising one or more lenses, followed by a pinhole array 9.
Then, the array of returning light beams impinges onto a detector 10, comprising an array of detector elements. For example, the detector 10 may be a CCD camera or a photodiode array. Each detector element or sensing element corresponds to a pinhole in the array 9.
The detector 10 is connected to a processing unit 11 where each light intensity measured in each of the detector elements is grabbed and analyzed.
The apparatus further comprises a control unit 12 being connected to the light emitter 1 as well as to a motor 13. Motor 13 is an example of a focus-shifting mechanism for shifting the focal plane of the optics system 5. In particular, motor 13 is coupled to the optics system 5 so as to shift or translate one or more lenses of the optics system along the optical axis. In this way, the focal plane location may be changed or shifted.
After receipt of a feedback signal that the location of the focal plane has changed (or that the one or more lenses have been shifted), control unit 12 triggers light emitter 1 to generate a light pulse. Processing unit 11 will grab data representative of the light intensity as detected by detector 10 corresponding to the light pulse which was reflected at the teeth portion 7. This procedure will be repeated for a plurality of locations for the focal plane.
As outlined in detail in WO 00/08415, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, for example, the surface topology of the image object (e.g. a teeth segment) is determined by determining the focal plane location for which, for a particular pixel, the light intensity is maximal. In this way, a three-dimensional representation of the object, e.g., the teeth segment, may be obtained. It may be displayed and/or further processed.
The array of light beams may comprise light beams having different wavelengths. For this purpose, the light emitter 1 may comprise different light sources emitting light of different wavelengths. In case of an array with beams of different wavelengths, the detector may be a spectrophotometer with color resolution. Examples for spectrophotometers are a three-chip CCD camera or the use of a Bayer mask over a monochrome CCD or other light sensor.
By using light components or light beams with different wavelengths, each being focused simultaneously on a different focal plane, the time for imaging may be reduced as different focal plane ranges can be simultaneously measured.
The probe head 6 may comprise a housing. For example, both the optics system 5 and the light guiding part may be provided within such a housing. The housing may be configured as a handheld device so that the light guiding part and/or optics system 5 and/or motor 13 are included in the handheld device.
As can be seen in this example, the outermost marginal ray 15″ of outermost light beam 15, after having passed through the optics system 5 and before entering the probe head 6, is parallel to the optical axis 24, and the marginal ray 15″ is parallel to chief ray 14″′ of the central beam that is on the optical axis 24.
In case of the complete array of light beams, the outermost marginal rays of the outer beams of the array (on either side of the optical axis) after having passed through the optics system and before entering probe head, are all parallel to the optical axis. As a consequence of this configuration, there is little or no lateral spread of the array of beams even when shifting the focal plane 17 of the array.
Each of the plurality of light beams may comprise a chief ray. For example, the outer beam 15 may comprise a chief ray 15″′ extending from an outer aperture at source plane 16 to the focus at focal plane 17.
As an alternative to or in combination with the above-described parallelism of the outermost marginal rays of the outermost beams and the chief ray of the central beam, the optics system may be configured such that the outermost marginal rays of the outermost light beams with respect to the optical axis of the optics system are divergent relative to the optical axis. In many embodiments, after having passed through the optics system, the outermost marginal ray of the outermost beams may show an opening angle with respect to the optical axis. This divergence angle or opening angle with respect to the optical axis may be at most 10°, preferably at most 8°.
In many embodiments, the confocal focusing system of the optics system comprises a non-telecentric optical system. The optics system can be configured such that the angle defined by the marginal rays of an outermost beam is complementary to the angle defined by the extreme off-axis chief rays with respect to the optical axis. In such embodiments, a decreased ray footprint at object to be imaged, e.g. the teeth segment, is provided.
As schematically illustrated in
End sidewall 22 comprises a mirror, which may be obtained by a suitable coating of the corresponding surface of the light-guiding part. The light-guiding part as a whole, in these embodiments, may comprise a one-piece body, for example, comprising a glass body or a body composed of a transparent resin. The first and second reflections at upper sidewall 20 and lower sidewall 21 may result from internal reflection.
In view of these embodiments, the light-guiding part of the probe head, in accordance with its one-piece form, may be manufactured in a simple and economical way.
The specific configuration of the optics system as described above allows for a long light-guiding part and probe head while maintaining a small thickness resulting in an improved intraoral use.
In many embodiments, and as illustrated in
The embodiments illustrated in
In many embodiments, the chief rays of each of a plurality of light beams exits the exit face 19 with a divergent angle with respect to the optical axis, for example. This divergence of each of the chief rays of the light beams provides improved measurements and can decrease the overlap of spots imaged onto the oral cavity, for example. The decrease of spread of the marginal rays the light beams as described herein can be combined with the divergence of the chief rays of each of the light beams in order to provide improved the accuracy of measurements as described herein, for example.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/021,608, filed Jul. 7, 2014, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2171695 | Harper | Sep 1939 | A |
2467432 | Kesling | Apr 1949 | A |
2531222 | Kesling | Nov 1950 | A |
3379193 | Monsghan | Apr 1968 | A |
3385291 | Martin | May 1968 | A |
3407500 | Kesling | Oct 1968 | A |
3478742 | Edward | Nov 1969 | A |
3496936 | Kenneth | Feb 1970 | A |
3533163 | Stanley | Oct 1970 | A |
3556093 | Clifford | Jan 1971 | A |
3600808 | Reeve | Aug 1971 | A |
3660900 | Andrews | May 1972 | A |
3683502 | Wallshein | Aug 1972 | A |
3738005 | Cohen | Jun 1973 | A |
3860803 | Levine | Jan 1975 | A |
3885310 | Northcutt | May 1975 | A |
3916526 | Schudy | Nov 1975 | A |
3922786 | Lavin | Dec 1975 | A |
3950851 | Bergersen | Apr 1976 | A |
3983628 | Acevedo | Oct 1976 | A |
4014096 | Dellinger | Mar 1977 | A |
4195046 | Kesling | Mar 1980 | A |
4253828 | Coles et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4255138 | Frohn | Mar 1981 | A |
4324546 | Heitlinger et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4324547 | Arcan et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4348177 | Kurz | Sep 1982 | A |
4348178 | Kurz | Sep 1982 | A |
4419992 | Chorbajian | Dec 1983 | A |
4478580 | Barrut | Oct 1984 | A |
4500294 | Lewis | Feb 1985 | A |
4504225 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
4505673 | Yoshii | Mar 1985 | A |
4526540 | Dellinger | Jul 1985 | A |
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4575805 | Moermann | Mar 1986 | A |
4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
4609349 | Cain | Sep 1986 | A |
4611288 | Duret et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4656860 | Orthuber et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4663720 | Duret et al. | May 1987 | A |
4664626 | Kesling | May 1987 | A |
4676747 | Kesling | Jun 1987 | A |
4742464 | Duret et al. | May 1988 | A |
4755139 | Abbatte et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4757824 | Chaumet | Jul 1988 | A |
4763791 | Halverson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4764111 | Knierim | Aug 1988 | A |
4793803 | Martz | Dec 1988 | A |
4798534 | Breads | Jan 1989 | A |
4836778 | Baumrind et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4837732 | Brandestini et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4850864 | Diamond | Jul 1989 | A |
4850865 | Napolitano | Jul 1989 | A |
4856991 | Breads et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4877398 | Kesling | Oct 1989 | A |
4880380 | Martz | Nov 1989 | A |
4886451 | Cetlin | Dec 1989 | A |
4889238 | Batchelor | Dec 1989 | A |
4890608 | Steer | Jan 1990 | A |
4935635 | O'Harra | Jun 1990 | A |
4936862 | Walker et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4937928 | van der Zel | Jul 1990 | A |
4941826 | Loran et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4952928 | Carroll et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4964770 | Steinbichler et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4975052 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4983334 | Adeli | Jan 1991 | A |
4997369 | Shafir | Mar 1991 | A |
5011405 | Lemchen | Apr 1991 | A |
5017133 | Miura | May 1991 | A |
5027281 | Rekow et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035613 | Breads et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5037295 | Bergersen | Aug 1991 | A |
5055039 | Abbatte et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059118 | Breads et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5100316 | Wildman | Mar 1992 | A |
5103838 | Yousif | Apr 1992 | A |
5121333 | Riley et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123425 | Shannon, Jr. et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5125832 | Kesling | Jun 1992 | A |
5128870 | Erdman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5130064 | Smalley | Jul 1992 | A |
5131843 | Hilgers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5131844 | Marinaccio et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139419 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145364 | Martz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176517 | Truax | Jan 1993 | A |
5184306 | Erdman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186623 | Breads et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5204670 | Stinton | Apr 1993 | A |
5242304 | Truax et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5245592 | Kuemmel et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5257203 | Riley et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5273429 | Rekow et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278756 | Lemchen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5306144 | Hibst et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5328362 | Watson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5335657 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5338198 | Wu et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340309 | Robertson | Aug 1994 | A |
5342202 | Deshayes | Aug 1994 | A |
5368478 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372502 | Massen | Dec 1994 | A |
5382164 | Stern | Jan 1995 | A |
5395238 | Andreiko et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5440326 | Quinn | Aug 1995 | A |
5440496 | Andersson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447432 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452219 | Dehoff et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454717 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456600 | Andreiko et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5431562 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474448 | Andreiko et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
RE35169 | Lemchen et al. | Mar 1996 | E |
5499633 | Fenton | Mar 1996 | A |
5518397 | Andreiko et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528735 | Strasnick et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533895 | Andreiko et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540732 | Testerman | Jul 1996 | A |
5542842 | Andreiko et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5543780 | McAuley et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549476 | Stern | Aug 1996 | A |
5562448 | Mushabac | Oct 1996 | A |
5570182 | Nathel et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5587912 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605459 | Kuroda et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607305 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614075 | Andre | Mar 1997 | A |
5621648 | Crump | Apr 1997 | A |
5626537 | Danyo et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645420 | Bergersen | Jul 1997 | A |
5645421 | Slootsky | Jul 1997 | A |
5651671 | Seay et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655653 | Chester | Aug 1997 | A |
5659420 | Wakai et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683243 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683244 | Truax | Nov 1997 | A |
5691539 | Pfeiffer | Nov 1997 | A |
5692894 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5725376 | Poirier | Mar 1998 | A |
5725378 | Wang | Mar 1998 | A |
5733126 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737084 | Ishihara | Apr 1998 | A |
5740267 | Echerer et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742700 | Yoon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774425 | Ivanov et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790242 | Stern et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799100 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800174 | Andersson | Sep 1998 | A |
5816800 | Brehm et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818587 | Devaraj et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823778 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5848115 | Little et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857853 | van Nifterick et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866058 | Batchelder et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879158 | Doyle et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880961 | Crump | Mar 1999 | A |
5880962 | Andersson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904479 | Staples | May 1999 | A |
5934288 | Avila et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957686 | Anthony | Sep 1999 | A |
5964587 | Sato | Oct 1999 | A |
5971754 | Sondhi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975893 | Chishti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980246 | Ramsay et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989023 | Summer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015289 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6044309 | Honda | Mar 2000 | A |
6049743 | Baba | Apr 2000 | A |
6053731 | Heckenberger | Apr 2000 | A |
6062861 | Andersson | May 2000 | A |
6068482 | Snow | May 2000 | A |
6099303 | Gibbs et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099314 | Kopelman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123544 | Cleary | Sep 2000 | A |
6152731 | Jordon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154676 | Levine | Nov 2000 | A |
6183248 | Chishti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186780 | Hibst et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190165 | Andreiko et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200133 | Kittelsen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201880 | Elbaum et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212435 | Lattner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217325 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217334 | Hultgren | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231338 | De Josselin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239705 | Glen | May 2001 | B1 |
6243601 | Wist | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244861 | Andreiko et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263234 | Engelhardt | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6309215 | Phan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315553 | Sachdeva et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322359 | Jordan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334073 | Levine | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350120 | Sachdeva et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6364660 | Durbin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382975 | Poirier | May 2002 | B1 |
6398548 | Muhammad et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402510 | Williams | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402707 | Ernst | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405729 | Thornton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436058 | Krahner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450807 | Chishti et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6482298 | Bhatnagar | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515593 | Stark et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516805 | Thornton | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520772 | Williams | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524101 | Phan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540707 | Stark et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554611 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6572372 | Phan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6573998 | Cohen-Sabban | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6594539 | Geng | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597934 | De Jong et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602070 | Miller et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611783 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613001 | Dworkin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616579 | Reinbold et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623698 | Kuo | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624752 | Klitsgaard et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629840 | Chishti et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640128 | Vilsmeier et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6697164 | Babayoff | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702765 | Robbins et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702804 | Ritter et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6705863 | Phan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722880 | Chishti et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6830450 | Knopp et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6885464 | Pfeiffer et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6890285 | Rahman et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6940611 | Babayoff et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7036514 | Heck et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7092107 | Babayoff et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7106233 | Schroeder et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112065 | Kopelman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138640 | Delgado | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7142312 | Quadling et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7166063 | Rahman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184150 | Quadling et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192273 | McSurdy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7220124 | Taub et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7230725 | Babayoff et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7286954 | Kopelman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292759 | Boutoussov et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302842 | Biester et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7338327 | Sticker et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D565509 | Fechner et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
7351116 | Dold | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357637 | Liechtung et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7450231 | Johs et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460230 | Johs et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7462076 | Walter et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463929 | Simmons | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477402 | Babayoff et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7488174 | Kopelman et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
D594413 | Palka et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
7544103 | Walter et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553157 | Abolfathi et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7561273 | Stautmeister et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577284 | Wong et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7596253 | Wong et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597594 | Stadler et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609875 | Liu et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
D603796 | Sticker et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
7616319 | Woollam et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7626705 | Altendorf | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7630089 | Babayoff et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632216 | Rahman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633625 | Woollam et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7637262 | Bailey | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668355 | Wong et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670179 | Muller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695327 | Bauerle et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698068 | Babayoff | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7724378 | Babayoff | May 2010 | B2 |
D618619 | Walter | Jun 2010 | S |
7731508 | Borst | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735217 | Borst | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780460 | Walter | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787132 | Korner et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7791810 | Powell | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796243 | Choo-Smith | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7796277 | Babayoff et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806727 | Dold et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7813787 | De Josselin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824180 | Abolfathi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828601 | Pyczak | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845969 | Stadler et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7854609 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7872760 | Ertl | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874836 | McSurdy et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874849 | Sticker et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878801 | Abolfathi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7907280 | Johs et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7929151 | Liang et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942671 | Taub et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7944569 | Babayoff et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947508 | Tricca et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7959308 | Freeman et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7986415 | Thiel et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7990548 | Babayoff et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8026916 | Wen | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027709 | Arnone et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8054556 | Chen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8077949 | Liang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083556 | Stadler et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
D652799 | Mueller | Jan 2012 | S |
8126025 | Takeda | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8144954 | Quadling et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8160334 | Thiel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8215312 | Garabadian et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8240018 | Walter et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8279450 | Oota | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8294657 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297286 | Smernoff | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306608 | Mandelis et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8310683 | Babayoff et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8314764 | Kim et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8332015 | Ertl | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8354588 | Sticker et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8363228 | Babayoff | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366479 | Borst et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8451456 | Babayoff | May 2013 | B2 |
8454364 | Taub et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8465280 | Sachdeva et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8477320 | Stock et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8488113 | Thiel | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8520922 | Wang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520925 | Duret | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8556625 | Lovely | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570530 | Liang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573224 | Thornton | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8577212 | Thiel et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594408 | Alpern | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8638447 | Babayoff et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638448 | Babayoff et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8650586 | Lee et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8675706 | Seurin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8723029 | Pyczak et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8743923 | Geske et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8767270 | Curry et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8768016 | Pan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8771149 | Rahman et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8839476 | Adachi | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870566 | Bergersen | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8878905 | Fisker | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8899976 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8936463 | Mason et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8948482 | Levin | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8956058 | Roesch et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8992216 | Karazivan | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9022792 | Sticker et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9039418 | Rubbert | May 2015 | B1 |
9084535 | Girkin et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9089277 | Babayoff et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9144512 | Wagner | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9192305 | Levin | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204952 | Lampalzer | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9242118 | Brawn | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9261358 | Atiya | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299192 | Kopelman | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9408743 | Wagner | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9433476 | Khardekar et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9439568 | Atiya et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9444981 | Bellis | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9500635 | Islam et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9506808 | Jeon et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9513470 | Weaver | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9545331 | Ingemarsson-Matzen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9584771 | Mandelis et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9675430 | Verker et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9693839 | Atiya et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9744006 | Ross | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9936186 | Jesenko et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20010038705 | Rubbert et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020006597 | Andreiko et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010568 | Rubbert et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015934 | Rubbert et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030009252 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030139834 | Nikolskiy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030207224 | Lotte | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224311 | Cronauer | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019262 | Perelgut | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040058295 | Bergersen | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040090638 | Babayoff et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128010 | Pavlovskaia et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050031196 | Moghaddam et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055118 | Nikolskiy et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080503 | Kopelman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100333 | Kerschbaumer | May 2005 | A1 |
20050181333 | Karazivan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050244781 | Abels et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250075 | Taub et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264828 | Babayoff et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001739 | Babayoff | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060084024 | Farrell | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099546 | Bergersen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060154198 | Durbin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158665 | Babayoff et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060223032 | Fried et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060223342 | Borst et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234179 | Wen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060275737 | Kopelman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070046865 | Umeda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070053048 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077537 | Taub et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070109559 | Babayoff et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070154867 | Taub et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184402 | Boutoussov et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070253059 | Johs et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080045053 | Stadler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063998 | Liang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080090208 | Rubbert | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100842 | Johs et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115791 | Heine | May 2008 | A1 |
20080176448 | Muller et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080242144 | Dietz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090030347 | Cao | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040740 | Muller et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090061379 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061381 | Durbin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090075228 | Kumada et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091758 | Johs et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090148807 | Babayoff et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153879 | Babayoff et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090210032 | Beiski et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218514 | Klunder et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090305540 | Stadler et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100045902 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100152599 | Duhamel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165275 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100165357 | Babayoff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100165358 | Babayoff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202034 | Freeman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231577 | Kim et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100312484 | Duhamel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110045428 | Boltunov et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110081625 | Fuh | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110102549 | Takahashi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110102566 | Zakian et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110143673 | Landesman et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110183294 | Taub et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110229840 | Liang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235045 | Koerner et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120081786 | Mizuyama et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120086681 | Kim et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092461 | Fisker | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120147912 | Moench et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172678 | Logan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120281293 | Gronenborn et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295216 | Dykes et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120322025 | Ozawa et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130094031 | Babayoff et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103176 | Kopelman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130163627 | Seurin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130177866 | Babayoff et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130201488 | Ishihara | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130235165 | Gharib et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130252195 | Popat | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130266326 | Joseph et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130280671 | Brawn et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286174 | Urakabe et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293824 | Yoneyama et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130323664 | Parker | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130323671 | Dillon et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130323674 | Hakomori et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140081091 | Abolfathi et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104620 | Babayoff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140272774 | Dillon et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140294273 | Jaisson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313299 | Gebhardt et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150002649 | Nowak et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150140502 | Brawn et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164335 | Van Der Poel et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230885 | Wucher et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150238280 | Wu et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150238283 | Tanugula et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150306486 | Logan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150320320 | Kopelman et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150325044 | Lebovitz | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150338209 | Knüttel et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160000332 | Atiya et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160003610 | Lampert et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160015489 | Atiya et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160045291 | Verker et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160051345 | Levin et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160064898 | Atiya et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160067013 | Morton et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081768 | Kopelman et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081769 | Kimura et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160135925 | Mason et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160163115 | Furst | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160217708 | Levin et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160296303 | Parker | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160328843 | Graham et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170007366 | Kopelman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007367 | Li et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170049311 | Borovinskih et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170049326 | Alfano et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170056131 | Alauddin et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170325690 | Salah et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180000563 | Shanjani et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180000565 | Shanjani et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180028063 | Elbaz et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180028064 | Elbaz et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180028065 | Elbaz et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180125610 | Carrier, Jr. et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180153648 | Shanjani et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180153649 | Wu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180153733 | Kuo | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3031677 | May 1979 | AU |
517102 | Jul 1981 | AU |
9150082 | Jun 1984 | AU |
5598894 | Jun 1994 | AU |
1121955 | Apr 1982 | CA |
102802520 | Nov 2012 | CN |
2749802 | May 1978 | DE |
69327661 | Jul 2000 | DE |
102005043627 | Mar 2007 | DE |
102011051443 | Jan 2013 | DE |
102014225457 | Jun 2016 | DE |
0091876 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0299490 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0376873 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0490848 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0541500 | May 1993 | EP |
0667753 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0731673 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0714632 | May 1997 | EP |
0774933 | May 1997 | EP |
1941843 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2213223 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2437027 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2447754 | May 2012 | EP |
1989764 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2332221 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2596553 | Dec 2013 | EP |
2612300 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2848229 | Mar 2015 | EP |
463897 | Jan 1980 | ES |
2369828 | Jun 1978 | FR |
2652256 | Mar 1991 | FR |
2930334 | Oct 2009 | FR |
15500777 | Aug 1979 | GB |
53-058191 | May 1978 | JP |
04-028359 | Jan 1992 | JP |
08-508174 | Sep 1996 | JP |
2003290133 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2008523370 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2009-018173 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2011087733 | May 2011 | JP |
2012526977 | Nov 2012 | JP |
2013007645 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2016528972 | Sep 2016 | JP |
101266966 | May 2013 | KR |
20160041632 | Apr 2016 | KR |
WO 9008512 | Aug 1990 | WO |
WO 9104713 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9410935 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9832394 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9844865 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9858596 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9924786 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0008415 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0217776 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-02062252 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02095475 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-2006133548 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007090865 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2009085752 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009089129 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009146788 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2009146789 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010145669 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2012007003 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012064684 | May 2012 | WO |
WO-2012074304 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 2014091865 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2015015289 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO-2015063032 | May 2015 | WO |
WO-2015176004 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO-2016061279 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO-2016084066 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016099471 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016113745 | Jul 2016 | WO |
WO-2016116874 | Jul 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 8,553,966 B1, 10/2013, Alpern et al. (withdrawn) |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,215, filed Jul. 3, 2014, Atiya et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,225, filed Jul. 3, 2014, Atiya et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,237, filed Jul. 3, 2014, Lampert et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,527, filed Jul. 17, 2014, Atiya et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/470,832, filed Aug. 27, 2014, Atiya et al. |
AADR. American Association for Dental Research, Summary of Activities, Mar. 20-23, 1980, Los ngeles, CA, p. 195. |
Alcaniz, et al, “An Advanced System for the Simulation and Planning of Orthodontic Treatments,” Karl Heinz Hohne and Ron Kikinis (eds.), Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 4th Intl. Conf., VBC '96, Hamburg, Germany, Sep. 22-25, 1996, Springer-Verlag, pp. 511-520. |
Alexander et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station Part 2 Clinical Management,” JCO, pp. 402-407 (Jul. 1990). |
Altschuler et al., “Analysis of 3-D Data for Comparative 3-D Serial Growth Pattern Studies of Oral-Facial Structures,” AADR Abstracts, Program and Abstracts of Papers, 57th General Session, IADR Annual Session, Mar. 29, 1979-Apr. 1, 1979, New Orleans Marriot, Journal of Dental Research, vol. 58, Jan. 1979, Special Issue A, p. 221. |
Altschuler et al., “Laser Electro-Optic System for Rapid Three-Dimensional (3D) Topographic Mapping of Surfaces,” Optical Engineering, 20(6):953-961 (1981). |
Altschuler et al., “Measuring Surfaces Space-Coded by a Laser-Projected Dot Matrix,” SPIE Imaging q Applications for Automated Industrial Inspection and Assembly, vol. 182, p. 187-191 (1979). |
Altschuler, “3D Mapping of Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis,” AADR Abstract #607, 2 pages total, (1980). |
Andersson et al., “Clinical Results with Titanium Crowns Fabricated with Machine Duplication and Spark Erosion,” Acta. Odontol. Scand., 47:279-286 (1989). |
Andrews, The Six Keys to Optimal Occlusion Straight Wire, Chapter 3, pp. 13-24 (1989). |
Bartels, et al., An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 422-425 (1987). |
Baumrind et al., “A Stereophotogrammetric System for the Detection of Prosthesis Loosening in Total Hip Arthroplasty,” NATO Symposium on Applications of Human Biostereometrics, Jul. 9-13, 1978, SPIE, vol. 166, pp. 112-123. |
Baumrind et al., “Mapping the Skull in 3-D,” reprinted from J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 48(2), 11 pages total, (1972 Fall Issue). |
Baumrind, “A System for Craniofacial Mapping Through the Integration of Data from Stereo X-Ray Films and Stereo Photographs,” an invited paper submitted to the 1975 American Society of Photogram Symposium on Close-Range Photogram Systems, University of III., Aug. 26-30, 1975, pp. 142-166. |
Baumrind, “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping: Background, Principles, and Perspectives,” Semin. in Orthod., 7(4):223-232 (Dec. 2001). |
Begole et al., “A Computer System for the Analysis of Dental Casts,” The Angle Orthod., 51(3):253-259 (Jul. 1981). |
Bernard et al.,“Computerized Diagnosis in Orthodontics for Epidemiological Studies: A ProgressReport,” Abstract, J. Dental Res. Special Issue, vol. 67, p. 169, paper presented at International Association for Dental Research 66th General Session, Mar. 9-13, 1988, Montreal, Canada. |
Bhatia et al., “A Computer-Aided Design for Orthognathic Surgery,” Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 22:237-253 (1984). |
Biggerstaff et al., “Computerized Analysis of Occlusion in the Postcanine Dentition,” Am. J. Orthod., 61(3): 245-254 (Mar. 1972). |
Biggerstaff, “Computerized Diagnostic Setups and Simulations,” Angle Orthod., 40(1):28-36 (Jan. 1970). |
Biostar Opeation & Training Manual. Great Lakes Orthodontics, Ltd. 199 Fire Tower Drive,Tonawanda, New York. 14150-5890, 20 pages total (1990). |
Blu, et al., “Linear interpolation revitalized”, IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 13(5):710-719 (May 2004). |
Bourke, “Coordinate System Transformation,” (Jun. 1996), p. 1, retrieved from the Internet Nov. 5, 2004, URL <http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/-pbourke/prolection/coords>. |
Boyd et al., “Three Dimensional Diagnosis and Orthodontic Treatment of Complex Malocclusions With the Invisalipn Appliance,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):274-293 (Dec. 2001). |
Brandestini et al., “Computer Machined Ceramic Inlays: In Vitro Marginal Adaptation,” J. Dent. Res. Special Issue, Abstract 305, vol. 64, p. 208 (1985). |
Brook et al., “An Image Analysis System for the Determination of Tooth Dimensions from Study Casts: Comparison with Manual Measurements of Mesio-distal Diameter,” J. Dent. Res., 65(3):428-431 (Mar. 1986). |
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 1),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(7):442-453 (Jul. 1979). |
Burstone (interview), “Dr. Charles J. Burstone on The Uses of the Computer in Orthodontic Practice (Part 2),” J. Clin. Orthod., 13(8):539-551 (Aug. 1979). |
Burstone et al., Precision Adjustment of the Transpalatal Lingual Arch: Computer Arch Form Predetermination, Am, Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 79, No. 2 (Feb. 1981), pp. 115-133. |
Cardinal Industrial Finishes, Powder Coatings information posted at <http://www.cardinalpaint.com> on Aug. 25, 2000, 2 pages. |
Carnaghan, “An Alternative to Holograms for the Portrayal of Human Teeth,” 4th Int'l. Conf. on Holographic Systems, Components and Applications, Sep. 15, 1993, pp. 228-231. |
CEREC Omnicam and CEREC Bluecam brochure. The first choice in every case. The Dental Company Sirona. 2014. |
Chaconas et al., “The DigiGraph Work Station, Part 1, Basic Concepts,” JCO, pp. 360-367 (Jun. 1990). |
Chafetz et al., “Subsidence of the Femoral Prosthesis, A Stereophotogrammetric Evaluation,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 201, pp. 60-67 (Dec. 1985). |
Chiappone, (1980). Constructing the Gnathologic Setup and Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 14, pp. 121-133. |
Cottingham, (1969). Gnathologic Clear Plastic Positioner, Am. J. Orthod, vol. 55, pp. 23-31. |
Crawford, “CAD/CAM in the Dental Office: Does It Work?”, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 121-123 (Feb. 1991). |
Crawford, “Computers in Dentistry: Part 1: CAD/CAM: The Computer Moves Chairside,” “Part 2: F. Duret—A Man With A Vision,” “Part 3: The Computer Gives New Vision- Literally,” “Part 4: Bytes 'N Bites” The Computer Moves From The Front Desk To The Operatory, Canadian Dental Journal, vol. 54(9), pp. 661-666 (1988). |
Crooks, “CAD/CAM Comes to USC,” USC Dentistry, pp. 14-17 (Spring 1990). |
Cureton, Correcting Malaligned Mandibular Incisors with Removable Retainers, J. Clin. Orthod, vol. 30, No. 7 (1996) pp. 390-395. |
Curry et al., “Integrated Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Mapping at the Craniofacial Research Instrumentation Laboratory/University of the Pacific,” Semin. Orthod., 7(4):258-265 (Dec. 2001). |
Cutting et al., “Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Design of Craniofacial Surgical Procedures: Optimization and Interaction with Cephalometric and CT-Based Models,” Plast. 77(6):877-885 (Jun. 1986). |
DCS Dental AG, “The CAD/CAM ‘DCS Titan System’ for Production of Crowns/Bridges,” DSC Production, pp. 1-7 (Jan. 1992. |
Definition for gingiva. Dictionary.com p. 1-3. Retrieved from the internet Nov. 5, 2004 <http://reference.com/search/search?q=gingiva>. |
Defranco et al., “Three-Dimensional Large Displacement Analysis of Orthodontic Appliances,” J. Biomechanics, 9:793-801 (1976). |
Dental Institute University of Zurich Switzerland, Program for International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the CEREC-Method, May 1991, 2 pages total. |
Dentrac Corporation, Dentrac document, pp. 4-13 (1992). |
Dent-X posted on Sep. 24, 1998 at <http://www.dent-x.com/DentSim.htm>, 6 pages. |
Doyle, “Digital Dentistry,” Computer Graphics World, pp. 50-52, 54 (Oct. 2000). |
Dummer, et al. Computed Radiography Imaging Based on High-Density 670 nm VCSEL Arrays. Proceedings of SPIE vol. 7557, 75570H (2010)http://vixarinc.com/pdf/SPIE_radiography_manuscript_submission1.pdf. |
DuraClearTM product information, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab, 1 page (1997). |
Duret et al, “CAD-CAM in Dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 117:715-720 (Nov. 1988). |
Duret et al., “CAD/CAM Imaging in Dentistry,” Curr. Opin. Dent., 1:150-154 (1991). |
Duret, “The Dental CAD/CAM, General Description of the Project,” Hennson International Product Brochure, 18 pages total, Jan. 1986. |
Duret,“Vers Une Prosthese Informatisee,” (English translation attached), Tonus, vol. 75, pp. 55-57 (Nov. 15, 1985). |
Economides, “The Microcomputer in the Orthodontic Office,” JCO, pp. 767-772 (Nov. 1979). |
Elsasser, Some Observations on the History and Uses of the Kesling Positioner, Am. J. Orthod. (1950) 36:368-374. |
English translation of Japanese Laid-Open Publication No. 63-11148 to inventor T. Ozukuri (Laid-Open on Jan. 18, 1998) pp. 1-7. |
Felton et al., “A Computerized Analysis of the Shape and Stability of Mandibular Arch Form,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(6):478-483 (Dec. 1987). |
Friede et al., “Accuracy of Cephalometric Prediction in Orthognathic Surgery,” Abstract of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:754-760 (1987). |
Futterling et al., “Automated Finite Element Modeling of a Human Mandible with Dental Implants,” JS WSCG '98 -Conference Program, retrieved from the Internet: <http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/papers98/Strasser 98.pdf>, 8 pages. |
Gao et a/., “3-D element Generation for Multi-Connected Complex Dental and Mandibular Structure,” Proc. Intl Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, pp. 267-271 (Jun. 12, 2001). |
Gim-Alldent Deutschland, “Das DUX System: Die Technik,” 2 pages total (2002). |
Gottleib et al., “JCO Interviews Dr. James A. McNamura, Jr., on the Frankel Appliance: Part 2: Clinical 1-1 Management,” J. Clin. Orthod., 16(6):390-407 (Jun. 1982). |
Grayson, “New Methods for Three Dimensional Analysis of Craniofacial Deformity, Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxiiofacial Surgery,” AAOMS, 3 pages total, (Sep. 13, 1990). |
Guess et al., “Computer Treatment Estimates In Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery,” JCO, pp. 262-280 (Apr. 1989). |
Heaven et al. “Computer-Based Image Analysis of Artificial Root Surface Caries,” Abstracts of Papers, J. Dent. Res., 70:528 (Apr. 17-21, 1991). |
Highbeam Research, “Simulating Stress Put on Jaw,” Tooling & Production [online], Nov. 1996, n pp. 1-2, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL http://static.highbeam.com/t/toolingampproduction/november011996/simulatingstressputonfa...>. |
Hikage, “Integrated Orthodontic Management System for Virtual Three-Dimensional Computer Graphic Simulation and Optical Video Image Database for Diagnosis and Treatment Planning”, Journal of Japan KA Orthodontic Society, Feb. 1987, English translation, pp. 1-38, Japanese version, 46(2), pp. 248-269 (60 pages total). |
Hoffmann, et al., “Role of Cephalometry for Planning of Jaw Orthopedics and Jaw Surgery Procedures,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), lnformatbnen, pp. 375-396 (Mar. 1991). |
Hojjatie et al., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Glass-Ceramic Dental Crowns,” J. Biomech., 23(11):1157-1166 (1990). |
Huckins, “CAD-CAM Generated Mandibular Model Prototype from MRI Data,” AAOMS, p. 96 (1999). |
Important Tip About Wearing the Red White & Blue Active Clear Retainer System, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab, 1 page 1998). |
JCO Interviews, Craig Andreiko , DDS, MS on the Elan and Orthos Systems, JCO, pp. 459-468 (Aug. 1994). |
JCO, Interviews, Dr. Homer W. Phillips on Computers in Orthodontic Practice, Part 2, JCO. 1997; 1983:819-831. |
Jerrold, “The Problem, Electronic Data Transmission and the Law,” AJO-DO, pp. 478-479 (Apr. 1988). |
Jones et al., “An Assessment of the Fit of a Parabolic Curve to Pre- and Post-Treatment Dental Arches,” Br. J. Orthod., 16:85-93 (1989). |
JP Faber et al., “Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning,” Am. J. Orthod., 73(1):36-46 (Jan. 1978). |
Kamada et.al., Case Reports On Tooth Positioners Using LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1984) 26(1): 11-29. |
Kamada et.al., Construction of Tooth Positioners with LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber and Some Case KJ Reports, J. Nihon University School of Dentistry (1982) 24(1):1-27. |
Kanazawa et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Occlusal Surfaces of Upper Molars in a Dutch Population,” J. Dent Res., 63(11):1298-1301 (Nov. 1984). |
Kesling et al., The Philosophy of the Tooth Positioning Appliance, American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral surgery. 1945; 31:297-304. |
Kesling, Coordinating the Predetermined Pattern and Tooth Positioner with Conventional Treatment, Am. J. Orthod. Oral Surg. (1946) 32:285-293. |
Kleeman et al., The Speed Positioner, J. Clin. Orthod. (1996) 30:673-680. |
Kochanek, “Interpolating Splines with Local Tension, Continuity and Bias Control,” Computer Graphics, 18(3):33-41 (Jul. 1984). Oral Surgery (1945) 31 :297-30. |
Kunii et al., “Articulation Simulation for an Intelligent Dental Care System,” Displays 15:181-188 (1994). |
Kuroda et al., Three-Dimensional Dental Cast Analyzing System Using Laser Scanning, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. (1996) 110:365-369. |
Laurendeau, et al., “A Computer-Vision Technique for the Acquisition and Processing of 3-D Profiles of 7 Dental Imprints: An Application in Orthodontics,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 10(3):453-461 (Sep. 1991). |
Leinfelder, et al., “A New Method for Generating Ceramic Restorations: a CAD-CAM System,” J. Am. 1-1 Dent. Assoc., 118(6):703-707 (Jun. 1989). |
Manetti, et al., “Computer-Aided Cefalometry and New Mechanics in Orthodontics,” (Article Summary in English, article in German), Fortschr Kieferorthop. 44, 370-376 (Nr. 5), 1983. |
Mccann, “Inside the ADA,” J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 118:286-294 (Mar. 1989). |
Mcnamara et al., “Invisible Retainers,” J. Cfin. Orthod., pp. 570-578 (Aug. 1985). |
Mcnamara et al., Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition, Needham Press, pp. 347-353 (Jan. 1993). |
Moermann et al., “Computer Machined Adhesive Porcelain Inlays: Margin Adaptation after Fatigue Stress,” IADR Abstract 339, J. Dent. Res., 66(a):763 (1987). |
Moles, “Correcting Mild Malalignments—As Easy As One, Two, Three,” AOA/Pro Corner, vol. 11, No. 1, 2 pages (2002). |
Mormann et al., “Marginale Adaptation von adhasuven Porzellaninlays in vitro,” Separatdruck aus:Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnmed. 95: 1118-1129, 1985. |
Nahoum, “The Vacuum Formed Dental Contour Appliance,” N. Y. State Dent. J., 30(9):385-390 (Nov. 1964). |
Nash, “CEREC CAD/CAM Inlays: Aesthetics and Durability in a Single Appointment,” Dent. Today, 9(8):20, 22-23 (Oct. 1990). |
Nishiyama et al., “A New Construction of Tooth Repositioner by LTV Vinyl Silicone Rubber,” J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent., 19(2):93-102 (1977). |
Paul et al., “Digital Documentation of Individual Human Jaw and Tooth Forms for Applications in Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and Forensic Medicine” Proc. of the 24th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '98), Sep. 4, 1998, pp. 2415-2418. |
Pellin Broca Prisms—Specifications. Thor Labs. Updated Nov. 30, 2012. www.thorlabs.com. |
Pinkham, “Foolish Concept Propels Technology,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Jan./Feb. 1989. |
Pinkham, “Inventor's CAD/CAM May Transform Dentistry,” Dentist, 3 pages total, Sep. 1990. |
Ponitz, “Invisible Retainers,” Am. J. Orthod., 59(3):266-272 (Mar. 1971). |
Procera Research Projects, “Procera Research Projects 1993—Abstract Collection,” pp. 3-7 28 (1993). |
Proffit et al., Contemporary Orthodontics, (Second Ed.), Chapter 15, Mosby Inc., pp. 470-533 (Oct. 1993). |
Raintree Essix & ARS Materials, Inc., Raintree Essix, Technical Magazine Table of contents and Essix Appliances, <http://www.essix.com/magazine/defaulthtml> Aug. 13, 1997. |
Redmond et al., “Clinical Implications of Digital Orthodontics,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 117(2):240-242 (2000). |
Rekow et al. “CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Some of the Curious Challenges,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(4):314-318 (Apr. 1991). |
Rekow et al., “Comparison of Three Data Acquisition Techniques for 3-D Tooth Surface Mapping,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 13(1):344-345 1991. |
Rekow, “A Review of the Developments in Dental CAD/CAM Systems,” (contains references to Japanese efforts and content of the papers of particular interest to the clinician are indicated with a one line summary of their content in the bibliography), Curr. Opin. Dent., 2:25-33 (Jun. 1992). |
Rekow, “CAD/CAM in Dentistry: A Historical Perspective and View of the Future,” J. Can. Dent. Assoc., 58(4):283, 287-288 (Apr. 1992). |
Rekow, “Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing in Dentistry: A Review of the State of the Art,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 58(4):512-516 (Oct. 1987). |
Rekow, “Dental CAD-CAM Systems: What is the State of the Art?”, J. Amer. Dent. Assoc., 122:43-48 1991. |
Rekow, “Feasibility of an Automated System for Production of Dental Restorations, Ph.D. Thesis,” Univ. of Minnesota, 244 pages total, Nov. 1988. |
Richmond et al., “The Development of a 3D Cast Analysis System,” Br. J. Orthod., 13(1):53-54 (Jan. 1986). |
Richmond et al., “The Development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): Reliability and Validity,” Eur. J. Orthod., 14:125-139 (1992). |
Richmond, “Recording The Dental Cast In Three Dimensions,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92(3):199-206 (Sep. 1987). |
Rudge, “Dental Arch Analysis: Arch Form, A Review of the Literature,” Eur. J. Orthod., 3(4):279-284 1981. |
Sakuda et al., “Integrated Information-Processing System In Clinical Orthodontics: An Approach with Use of a Computer Network System,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 101(3): 210-220 (Mar. 1992). |
Schellhas et al., “Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Maxillofacial Surgical Planning,” Arch. Otolamp!. Head Neck Surg., 114:438-442 (Apr. 1988). |
Schroeder et al., Eds. The Visual Toolkit, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1998) Chapters 6, 8 & 9, (pp. 153-210,309-354, and 355-428, respectively). |
Shilliday, (1971). Minimizing finishing problems with the mini-positioner, Am. J. Orthod. 59:596-599. |
Siemens, “CEREC—Computer-Reconstruction,” High Tech in der Zahnmedizin, 14 pages total (2004). |
Sinclair, “The Readers' Corner,” J. Clin. Orthod., 26(6):369-372 (Jun. 1992). |
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, CEREC 3D, Manuel utiiisateur, Version 2.0X (in French), 2003,114 pages total. |
Stoll et al., “Computer-aided Technologies in Dentistry,” (article summary in English, article in German), Dtsch Zahna'rztl Z 45, pp. 314-322 (1990). |
Sturman, “Interactive Keyframe Animation of 3-D Articulated Models,” Proceedings Graphics Interface '84, May-Jun. 1984, pp. 35-40. |
The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for doctors. http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/doctorhtml>, 5 pages (May 19, 2003). |
The Choice is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for patients, <http://ormco.com/aoa/appliancesservices/RWB/patients.html>, 2 pages (May 19, 2003). |
The Choice Is Clear: Red, White & Blue . . . The Simple, Affordable, No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information, 6 pages (2003). |
The Red, White & Blue Way to Improve Your Smile! Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product information for patients, 2 pages 1992. |
Truax L., “Truax Clasp-Less(TM) Appliance System,” Funct. Orthod., 9(5):22-4, 26-8 (Sep.-Oct. 1992). |
Tru-Tain Orthodontic & Dental Supplies, Product Brochure, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, 16 pages total (1996). |
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Automated Crown Replication Using Solid Photography SM,” Solid Photography Inc., Melville NY, Oct. 1977, 20 pages total. |
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, “Holodontography: An Introduction to Dental Laser Holography,” School of Aerospace Medicine Brooks AFB Tex, Mar. 1973, 37 pages total. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/050,342, filed Jun. 20, 1997, 41 pages total. |
Van Der Linden et al., “Three-Dimensional Analysis of Dental Casts by Means of the Optocom,” J. Dent. Res., p. 1100 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
Van Der Linden, “A New Method to Determine Tooth Positions and Dental Arch Dimensions,” J. Dent. Res., 51(4):1104 (Jul.-Aug. 1972). |
Van Der Zel, “Ceramic-Fused-to-Metal Restorations with a New CAD/CAM System,” Quintessence Int., 24(11):769-778 (1993). |
Varady et al., “Reverse Engineering of Geometric Models—An Introduction,” Computer-Aided Design, 29(4):255-268,1997. |
Verstreken et al., “An Image-Guided Planning System for Endosseous Oral Implants,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 17(5):842-852 (Oct. 1998). |
Warunek et al., Physical and Mechanical Properties of Elastomers in Orthodonic Positioners, Am J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop, vol. 95, No. 5, (May 1989) pp. 399-400. |
Warunek et.al., Clinical Use of Silicone Elastomer Applicances, JCO (1989) XXIII(10):694-700. |
Wells, Application of the Positioner Appliance in Orthodontic Treatment, Am. J. Orthodont. (1970) 58:351-366. |
Williams, “Dentistry and CAD/CAM: Another French Revolution,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 2-5 (Jan./Mar. 1987). |
Williams, “The Switzerland and Minnesota Developments in CAD/CAM,” J. Dent. Practice Admin., pp. 50-55 (Apr./Jun. 1987). |
Wishan, “New Advances in Personal Computer Applications for Cephalometric Analysis, Growth Prediction, Surgical Treatment Planning and Imaging Processing,” Symposium: Computerized Facial Imaging in Oral and Maxilofacial Surgery Presented on Sep. 13, 1990. |
WSCG'98—Conference Program, “The Sixth International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization '98,” Feb. 9-13, 1998, pp. 1-7, retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 5, 2004, URL<http://wscg.zcu.cz/wscg98/wscg98.h>. |
Xia et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual-Reality Surgical Planning and Soft-Tissue Prediction for Orthognathic Surgery,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 5(2):97-107 (Jun. 2001). |
Yamamoto et al., “Optical Measurement of Dental Cast Profile and Application to Analysis of Three-Dimensional Tooth Movement in Orthodontics,” Front. Med. Biol. Eng., 1(2):119-130 (1988). |
Yamamoto et al., “Three-Dimensional Measurement of Dental Cast Profiles and Its Applications to Orthodontics,” Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 12(5):2051-2053 (1990). |
Yamany et al., “A System for Human Jaw Modeling Using Intra-Oral Images,” Proc. of the 20th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Nov. 1, 1998, vol. 2, pp. 563-566. |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); I. The D.P. Concept and Implementation of Transparent Silicone Resin (Orthocon),” Nippon Dental Review, 452:61-74 (Jun. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); II. The D.P. Manufacturing Procedure and Clinical Applications,” Nippon Dental Review, 454:107-130 (Aug. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III.—The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 2. Skeletal Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 458:112-129 (Dec. 1980). |
Yoshii, “Research on a New Orthodontic Appliance: The Dynamic Positioner (D.P.); III. The General Concept of the D.P. Method and Its Therapeutic Effect, Part 1, Dental and Functional Reversed Occlusion Case Reports,” Nippon Dental Review, 457:146-164 (Nov. 1980). |
You May Be A Candidate For This Invisible No-Braces Treatment, Allesee Orthodontic Appliances-Pro Lab product infollnation for patients, 2 pages (2002). |
International search report and written opinion dated Sep. 25, 2015 for PCT/IB2015/054949. |
Invitation to pay additional fees dated Oct. 7, 2015 for PCT/IB2015/054950. |
Office action dated Oct. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,527. |
Office action dated Mar. 22, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,527. |
Office action dated Jul. 20, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/334,527. |
International search report and written opinion dated Jan. 4, 2016 for PCT/IB2015/054950. |
Doruk et al. The role of the headgear timer in extraoral co-operation; European Journal of Orthodontics; 26 (Jun. 1, 2004): pp. 289-291. |
Friedrich et al. Measuring system for in vivo recording of force systems in orthodontic treatment-concept and analysis of accuracy. J. Biomech. 32.1, (Jan. 1999); pp. 81-85; (Abstract Only). |
Grest, Daniel., Marker-Free Human Motion Capture in Dynamic Cluttered Environments from a Single View-Point, PhD Thesis. Dec. 2007, 171 pages. |
Grove et al. U.S. Appl. No. 15/726,243 entitled “Interproximal reduction templates,” filed Oct. 5, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/162015/001400 dated Feb. 9, 2016. |
Invisalign., You were made to move. There's never been a better time to straighten your teeth with the most advanced clear aligner in the world'; Product webpage; 2 pages; retrieved from the internet (www.invisalign.com/) on Dec. 28, 2017. |
Kumar et al.; Rapid maxillary expansion: A unique treatment modality in dentistry, J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 5.4, Aug. 2011, pp. 906-911. |
Nedelcu et al. Scanning Accuracy and Precision in 4 Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Comparison Based on 3-Dimensional Analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent.; 112.6 (Dec. 2014): pp. 1461-71. |
Sahm et al. Micro-Electronic Monitoring of Functional Appliance Wear. Eur J Orthod.; 12.3 (Aug. 1990): pp. 297-301. |
Sahm., Presentation of a wear timer for the clarification of scientific questions in orthodontic orthopedics. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie, 51.4 (Jul. 1990): pp. 243-247, (Translation Included). |
Schafer, et al. Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2014; 1-8. |
Thera Mon., “Microsensor”, “2 pages”, retrieved from the internet (www.english.thera-mon.com/the-product/transponder/index.html), Sep. 19, 2016. |
Tiziani H. J. et al., Confocal principle for macro—and microscopic surface and defect analysis. Optical Engineering, vol. 39.1 (Jan. 1, 2000), pp. 32-39. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. |
Wikipedia, Palatal expansion, 3 pages, retrieved from the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palatal_expansion) Mar. 5, 2018. |
Wireless Sensor Networks Magazine, Embedded Teeth for Oral Activity Recognition, 2 pages, retrievedon Sep. 19, 2016 from the internet (www.wsnmagazine.com/embedded-teeth/), Jul. 29,2013. |
Witt et al. The wear-timing measuring device in orthodontics-cui bono? Reflections on the state-of-the-art in wear-timing measurement and compliance research in orthodontics, Fortschr Kieferorthop. 52.3 (Jun. 1991), pp. 117-125. (Translation Included). |
Yamada et al. Simulation of fan-beam type optical computed-tomography imaging of strongly scattering and weakly absorbing media, Applied Optics; 32.25 (Sep. 1, 1993): pp. 4808-4814. |
Park, et al. Development of High Speed and High Accuracy 3D Dental Intra Oral Scanner. Procedia Engineering. vol. 100, 2015, pp. 1174-1181. |
International search report with written opinion dated Apr. 26, 2018 for PCT/US2018/013321. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160000332 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62021608 | Jul 2014 | US |