The present invention generally relates to techniques for controlling the amount of a coating that is applied on paper sheet or other web products, and in particular to a device that generates charged coating droplets that are sprayed in a controlled manner onto the web to create a uniform distribution of the coating.
In the process of papermaking, it is often desirable to coat a paper sheet (called a “base sheet”) with any of a wide variety of materials. Indeed, an increasing proportion of the world's paper production is devoted to coated paper and coated paperboard. Coatings are usually applied to provide a glossy white surface for magazine pages, gift-wrapping, shoeboxes, and the like. Alternatively, or in addition, such coatings may also be intended to render the paper sheet waterproof. As another example of a coating material, microencapsulated ink may be applied as a coating to one side of a sheet of carbonless copy paper.
Coatings may be applied to paper as part of the papermaking process in a paper mill. Alternatively, previously manufactured paper may be supplied to the coating machine, called a “coater”, from large rolls of paper sheet. In either event, the uncoated paper is usually supplied to the coater in sheets that are on the order of 3 meter or more in width measured along the “cross-direction” (i.e., the direction transverse to the direction of movement of the paper along the papermaking and/or coating machine).
Uniformity of coating “basis weight” the mass of the coating material on a unit of surface area of the sheet) is often necessary or desirable for various reasons. For example, the printability of glossy paper may be improved by the uniform application of a gloss coating. Also, gloss coatings may contain relatively expensive materials, such as latex and/or TiO2. Accordingly, the manufacturer will want to precisely monitor the coating and control the application of such coating to apply as uniform a coating as possible. In some cases, the evenness of the coating must be controlled within a fraction of a gram/m2. However, because of the lateral extent of the sheet in the cross-direction (3 meters or more) and the requirement of accurately and evenly applying a coating to such sheets, rather complex coaters have been designed and manufactured.
Coaters come in a variety of configurations. One type of coater, called a “blade coater”, comprises a rotating backing drum disposed adjacent to one side of a moving paper sheet and a flexible blade disposed adjacent to the opposite side of the sheet. The drum and blade edge extend in the cross-direction of the sheet to form a narrow slot through which the sheet of paper passes. A pool of coating material is retained between the backing drum and the blade, and thus coats the sheet as it passes therebetween. The blade presses against the paper with the coating applied as the sheet exits through the slot, thereby removing excess coating.
It will be appreciated that the separation of the drum from the blade edge is a critical factor in the application of such coatings. The drum is fabricated and installed to high tolerances. To control the thickness of the coating applied to a sheet, coaters provide actuators for adjusting the pressure of the blade edge against the coated sheet, and/or the position of the blade edge relative to the drum. The blade is usually made of a thin steel member that may be slightly bent or flexed. Thus, actuators are installed at intervals alone the length of the blade, such that each actuator controls the pressure applied by the blade in the vicinity of the actuator, and therefore, the amount of coating material on the base sheet. The cross-directional length of the blade in the vicinity of each actuator is known as a “slice”. Local variations in blade pressure and paper thickness, and other factors tend to produce uneven coatings. Even distribution of coating on paper and other web coating applications is difficult to achieve. Often, in order to form uniform coatings, excessive coating (or over spray) or non-ideal coating distribution must be applied.
The present invention is based, in part, on the recognition that electrically charging droplets in a spray in a coating process will minimize the amount of coating material required to uniformly coat a surface as compared to conventional web coating techniques such as blade coating. The invention provides a method of controlling the droplet size; moreover, the equally charged droplets that are generated exert electrostatic repulsive forces which facilitate their uniform distribution and in the process of being directed toward the surface of a web, the droplets will adhere to the surface of the web and the resulting coating will exhibit the required pattern over a web surface. While the invention will be illustrated with respect to coating paper, it is understood that the device can be employed to coat any object, and web products in particular, where uniform distribution of the coating is required.
In one aspect, the invention is directed to an apparatus for producing a spray of charged droplets of a liquid that includes:
In another aspect, the invention is directed to an apparatus for coating a web that is moving in the machine direction that includes:
In a further aspect, the invention is directed to a method of distributing a liquid along the length of a moving web that is guided by a continuous rotatable roll that includes the steps of:
The outer contour of spray 20 is preferably cone-shaped with the individual droplets 22 being evenly distributed within the inner region of the cone. Because the droplets 22 are electrically charged at the same polarity they will repel each other. It is understood that the shape of spray 20 can be modified as desired depending on how the liquid coating is to he applied. For instance, the spray can be generated as a linear jet stream, a two-dimensional fan, or other arrangement by changing the nozzle aperture configuration.
The liquid to be sprayed is supplied via channel 10 to the spray device where the liquid flow rate can be regulated by conventional means including pressure controller 6 and flow regulator valve 26. One method of forming electrically charged droplets 22 is by charging the liquid by conduction prior to its being delivered to spray mechanism 4. For example, as shown in
Alternatively, the spray mechanism 4 can be configured to emit a spray 4 of non-charged droplets 22 that are subsequently charged by induction. In a preferred embodiment as illustrated in
The inductive element 14 also serves to control the spray angle so that the droplets 22 can be directed toward different directions as desired. In this regard, a drive mechanism 18, that maneuvers inductive element 14 and which is supported on platform 12, can comprise servomotors, linear or electromagnetic actuators. The inductive element's potential has a polarity that is either equal to or opposite that of the discharged droplets. As is apparent, this spray angle control mechanism can also be used to change the angle of spray 20 even in the configuration where the charged droplets are generated from charged liquids. The spray angle mechanism can also be moved linearly in the direction of the spray flow to change the proximity of the inductive ring to the spray droplets. In each case, the inductive element 14 allows spray patterns to be manipulated as desired. This can be accomplished, for instance, by tilting the position of inductive element 14 and thereby alter the spray angle: In addition, the current through inductive element 14 can be increased or decreased to change the electric field strength. When the inductive element is at the same polarity as that of the charged droplets, the higher current will cause greater repulsion of the charged droplet particles and result in a smaller cone shaped spray. This method works with any form of atomized spray that is charged by induction or conduction.
The spray apparatus 2 can be employed to spray any suitable liquid based formulation that will form droplets that can maintain a stable electric charge. Preferred formulations are electrically conductive and preferably comprise water or aqueous solutions and mixtures. For paper applications, water is often applied at different stages of the papermaking process. In addition, there is a large variety of coating formulations, many of which consist of as many as ten or more components. These components can be broadly classified as pigments, binders, and additives, almost always as aqueous dispersions. Various formulations of latexes are used for binders to hold the pigment particles together and to bond them to the paper. A typical coating formulation includes 80% to 90% pigment, 3% to 10% latex, with the remainder consisting of additives or other components.
As shown in
Actuators 82A, 82B and 82C control the distribution of the coating along the cross direction. Measured data from sensors 56, 58 are communicated to controller 66 that calculates control actions for the actuators in order to minimize the variation of the measured properties data from a desired target. For example, if the measured CD coating profile deviates from a target, appropriate control actions are communicated to at least one of the actuators to changes its spray angle, droplet size, droplet volume and/or other parameters.
The foregoing has described the principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of the present invention. However, the invention should not be construed as being limited to the particular embodiments discussed. Thus, the above-described embodiments should be regarded as illustrative rather than as restrictive, and it should be appreciated that variations can be made in those embodiments by workers skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2890388 | Croskey et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
3152918 | Kraus | Oct 1964 | A |
3900000 | Gallen | Aug 1975 | A |
3911448 | Ohno et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3968498 | Uchiyama | Jul 1976 | A |
4009829 | Sickles | Mar 1977 | A |
4215818 | Hopkinson | Aug 1980 | A |
4240585 | Sickles | Dec 1980 | A |
4281333 | Tsuzuki et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4383767 | Jido | May 1983 | A |
4489894 | Marchant et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4829996 | Noakes | May 1989 | A |
4887770 | Wacker et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5045342 | Boissevain | Sep 1991 | A |
RE33741 | Boissevain | Nov 1991 | E |
5065673 | Taylor | Nov 1991 | A |
5086972 | Chang et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5154358 | Hartle | Oct 1992 | A |
5163365 | Taylor | Nov 1992 | A |
5520715 | Oeftering | May 1996 | A |
5527564 | Napadow | Jun 1996 | A |
5765761 | Law et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5948183 | Okada et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5948483 | Kim et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6074483 | Belotserkovsky | Jun 2000 | A |
6211477 | Cardott | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248407 | Hess | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6334579 | Zarbi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353271 | Williams | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6494954 | Bernert et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6623112 | Yamada et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6684879 | Coffee et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6764720 | Pui et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7494567 | Haran | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7972658 | Kukkurainen | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20040050946 | Wang et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060110544 | Kim et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070194157 | Golden et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080273061 | Tsuchiya et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004122091 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2006021148 | Jan 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130156970 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |