This disclosure relates generally to semiconductor devices, and more specifically to semiconductor memory devices. In particular, the disclosure relates to volatile memory, such as dynamic random access memory (DRAM). Information may be stored on individual memory cells of the memory as a physical signal (e.g., a charge on a capacitive element). The memory may be a volatile memory, and the physical signal may decay over time (which may degrade or destroy the information stored in the memory cells). It may be necessary to periodically refresh the information in the memory cells by, for example, rewriting the information to restore the physical signal to an initial value.
As memory components have decreased in size, the density of memory cells has greatly increased. Typically, memory cells are arranged in an array that includes a series of rows referred to as word lines and columns referred to as bit lines. An auto-refresh operation may be carried out where the memory cells of one or more word lines are periodically refreshed to preserve data stored in the memory cells. Repeated access to a particular memory cell or group of memory cells, such as a word line, may cause an increased rate of data degradation in nearby memory cells (e.g., adjacent word lines). This repeated access is often referred to as a ‘row hammer.’ To preserve the data in nearby memory cells, the word lines of the nearby memory cells may need to be refreshed at a rate higher than a rate of the auto-refresh operations.
The following description of certain embodiments is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the scope of the disclosure or its applications or uses. In the following detailed description of embodiments of the present systems and methods, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the described systems and methods may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice presently disclosed systems and methods, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural and logical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Moreover, for the purpose of clarity, detailed descriptions of certain features will not be discussed when they would be apparent to those with skill in the art so as not to obscure the description of embodiments of the disclosure. The following detailed description is therefore not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the disclosure is defined only by the appended claims.
A memory device may include an array of memory cells. The memory cells may store information (e.g., as one or more bits), and may be organized at the intersection of word lines (rows) and bit lines (columns). A number of word lines and bit lines may be organized into a memory bank. The memory device may include a number of different memory banks. The memory device may receive one or more command signals which may indicate operations in one or more of the banks of one or more memory packages. The memory device may enter a refresh mode, in which word lines in one or more of the memory banks are refreshed.
Information in the memory cells may decay over time. The memory cells may be refreshed on a row-by-row (e.g., word line-by-word line) basis to preserve information in the memory cells. During a refresh operation, the information in one or more rows may be rewritten back to the respective word line to restore an initial value of the information. Repeated access to a given word line (e.g., an aggressor word line) may cause an increased rate of information decay in one or more physically neighboring word lines (e.g., victim word lines). In some applications, victim word lines may be considered to be the word lines which are physically adjacent to the aggressor word line. For example, victim word lines may be located on either side of the aggressor word line (e.g., R+1 and R−1). In some embodiments, the word lines which are adjacent to the adjacent word lines (e.g., R+2 and R−2) may also be treated as victim word lines. Thus, in some embodiments, there may be four victim addresses for each aggressor address. In some applications, such as memories where word lines are densely spaced, more distant word lines may be considered victim word lines (e.g., R+3, R−3, R+4, R−4, etc.).
Accesses to different word lines of the memory may be tracked in order to determine if a word line is an aggressor word line. The row address of the accessed word lines and/or aggressor word lines may be stored in a register or other storage device in the memory. If a word line is determined to be an aggressor word line, victim word lines may be determined based, at least in part, on a row address of the aggressor word line. In some embodiments, the victim word lines (e.g., R+1, R−1, R+2, and R−2) may be refreshed as part of a targeted (or ‘row hammer’) refresh operation. The targeted refresh operation for preserving data in the victim word lines may also be referred to as ‘healing’ the victim word lines. Targeted refresh operations may preserve data in victim word lines, but the targeted refresh operations may steal timeslots which would otherwise be used for auto-refresh operations, thus decreasing the rate of auto-refresh operations. As the auto-refresh rate is reduced by targeted refresh operations, data degradation could occur in memory cells unaffected by the row hammer. Increasing the auto-refresh rate to compensate for the targeted refreshes may cause the memory to use more power and/or increase delays between memory access operations (e.g., read, write). Accordingly, reducing unnecessary targeted refresh operations is desired.
Although the accessed word line associated with the victim word lines is referred to as an aggressor word line, it may be only a suspected aggressor word line and/or a word line treated as an aggressor word line for preemptive healing of victim word lines. However, for simplicity, any word line associated with victim word lines and/or word lines refreshed during a targeted refresh operation may be referred to herein as an aggressor word line.
While accesses to different word lines are tracked, data related to the victim word lines associated with the accessed word lines often is not. When information about the individual victim word lines is not tracked, it may not be possible to distinguish which victim word lines have been refreshed. Thus, all of the victim word lines associated with the aggressor word line may be provided for refreshing together to ensure that all of the victim word lines are refreshed. In some applications, this may require refreshing four word lines (e.g., R+1, R−1, R+2, R−2), which may require ‘stealing’ four or more refreshes from the auto-refresh operation. It may be desirable to reduce the number of unnecessary targeted refresh operations to reduce the impact on the auto-refresh rate (e.g., increase the period between the periodic targeted refresh operations) and/or power consumption by a memory device.
In some memories with row hammer management capabilities, row addresses associated with accessed word lines may be stored. Additionally, data for victim word lines associated with the accessed word lines may be stored and associated with the stored row addresses.
Just as an aggressor word line may have multiple victims, a victim word line may be a victim of more than one aggressor word line. For example, if a pair of word lines are separated from each other by a single word line, the word line in between may be a victim word line of both of the neighboring word lines. Thus, a victim word line may be associated with victim data for multiple accessed row addresses. Accordingly, the victim word line may be refreshed multiple times based on the victim word line's association with the multiple accessed row addresses. However, the victim word line may not need to be refreshed multiple times. That is, the victim word line may undergo unnecessary refresh operations due to the “duplicate” victim data associated with different accessed row addresses.
Furthermore, a word line that is a victim may also be an accessed word line. Accessing the word line causes the data stored in the word line to be retrieved and rewritten to the word line. Thus, similar to a refresh operation, accessing the word line “heals” the data stored in the word line. Accordingly, after being accessed, a victim word line may not need to be refreshed by a targeted refresh operation to preserve the data.
The present disclosure is drawn to apparatuses and methods for adjusting the victim word line data associated with accessed row addresses. An apparatus may include a “reverse scrambler” that receives a refresh address or accessed row address and calculates row addresses for word lines that could be aggressor word lines to the word line associated with the refresh address or accessed row address. In other words, the reverse scrambler may calculate row addresses for all of the word lines that could cause the word line corresponding to a refresh address or accessed row address to become a victim word line. Victim data for the calculated row addresses may be adjusted such that the victim data reflects the ‘healing’ of the victim word lines (e.g., preserving the data stored in the word line) by one or more mechanisms (e.g., targeted refresh, auto-refresh, access). Adjusting the victim data as described herein may reduce the number of unnecessary refresh operations in some applications.
The semiconductor device 100 includes a memory array 112. In some embodiments, the memory array 112 may include of a plurality of memory banks. Each memory bank includes a plurality of word lines WL, a plurality of bit lines BL and /BL, and a plurality of memory cells MC arranged at intersections of the plurality of word lines WL and the plurality of bit lines BL and /BL. The selection of the word line WL is performed by a row control circuit 108 and the selection of the bit lines BL and /BL is performed by a column control circuit 110. In some embodiments, there may be a row control circuit 108 and column control circuit 110 for each of the memory banks.
The bit lines BL and /BL are coupled to a respective sense amplifier (SAMP) 117. Read data from the bit line BL or /BL is amplified by the sense amplifier SAMP 117, and transferred to read/write amplifiers 120 over complementary local data lines (LIOT/B), transfer gate (TG) 118, and complementary main data lines (MIO). Conversely, write data outputted from the read/write amplifiers 120 is transferred to the sense amplifier 117 over the complementary main data lines MIO, the transfer gate 118, and the complementary local data lines LIOT/B, and written in the memory cell MC coupled to the bit line BL or BL.
The semiconductor device 100 may employ a plurality of external terminals that include command and address (C/A) terminals coupled to a command and address bus to receive commands and addresses, clock terminals to receive clocks CK and /CK, data terminals DQ to provide data, and power supply terminals to receive power supply potentials VDD, VSS, VDDQ, and VSSQ.
The clock terminals are supplied with external clocks CK and /CK that are provided to a clock input circuit 122. The external clocks may be complementary. The clock input circuit 122 generates an internal clock ICLK based on the CK and /CK clocks. The ICLK clock is provided to the command control circuit 106 and to an internal clock generator circuit 124. The internal clock generator circuit 124 provides various internal clocks LCLK based on the ICLK clock. The LCLK clocks may be used for timing operation of various internal circuits. The internal data clocks LCLK are provided to the input/output circuit 126 to time operation of circuits included in the input/output circuit 126, for example, to data receivers to time the receipt of write data.
The C/A terminals may be supplied with memory addresses. The memory addresses supplied to the C/A terminals are transferred, via a command/address input circuit 102, to an address decoder circuit 104. The address decoder circuit 104 receives the address and supplies a decoded row address XADD to the row control circuit 108 and supplies a decoded column address YADD to the column control circuit 110. The row address XADD may be used to specify one or more word lines WL of the memory array 112 and the column address YADD may specify one or more bit lines BL of the memory array 112. The address decoder circuit 104 may also provide a bank address BADD, which specifies a particular bank of the memory. The bank address BADD may be provided to the row control circuit 108 and/or column control circuit 110 to direct access operations to one or more of the banks. The C/A terminals may be supplied with commands. Examples of commands include timing commands for controlling the timing of various operations, access commands for accessing the memory, such as read commands for performing read operations and write commands for performing write operations, as well as other commands and operations. The access commands may be associated with one or more row address XADD, column address YADD, and/or bank address BADD to indicate the memory cell(s) to be accessed.
The commands may be provided as internal command signals to a command control circuit 106 via the command/address input circuit 102. The command control circuit 106 includes circuits to decode the internal command signals to generate various internal signals and commands for performing operations. For example, the command control circuit 106 may provide a row command signal to select a word line and a column command signal to select a bit line.
The device 100 may receive an access command which is a row activation command ACT. When the row activation command ACT is received, a row address XADD is timely supplied with the row activation command ACT.
The device 100 may receive an access command which is a read command. When a read command is received, a bank address BADD and a column YADD address are timely supplied with the read command, read data is read from memory cells in the memory array 112 corresponding to the row address XADD and column address YADD. The read command is received by the command control circuit 106, which provides internal commands so that read data from the memory array 112 is provided to the read/write amplifiers 120. The read data is output to outside from the data terminals DQ via the input/output circuit 126.
The device 100 may receive an access command which is a write command. When the write command is received, a bank address and a column address are timely supplied with the write command, write data supplied to the data terminals DQ is written to a memory cells in the memory array 112 corresponding to the row address and column address. The write command is received by the command control circuit 106, which provides internal commands so that the write data is received by data receivers in the input/output circuit 126. Write clocks may also be provided to the external clock terminals for timing the receipt of the write data by the data receivers of the input/output circuit 126. The write data is supplied via the input/output circuit 126 to the read/write amplifiers 120, and by the read/write amplifiers 120 to the memory array 112 to be written into the memory cell MC.
The device 100 may also receive commands causing it to carry out refresh operations. A refresh signal AREF may be a pulse signal which is activated when the command control circuit 106 receives a signal which indicates a refresh mode. In some embodiments, the refresh command may be externally issued to the memory device 100. In some embodiments, the refresh command may be periodically generated by a component of the device. In some embodiments, when an external signal indicates a refresh entry command, the refresh signal AREF may also be activated. The refresh signal AREF may be activated once immediately after command input, and thereafter may be cyclically activated at desired internal timing. Thus, refresh operations may continue automatically. A self-refresh exit command may cause the automatic activation of the refresh signal AREF to stop and return to an IDLE state.
The refresh control circuit 116 supplies a refresh row address RXADD to the row control circuit 108, which may refresh one or more word lines WL indicated by the refresh row address RXADD. The refresh control circuit 116 may control a timing of the refresh operation based on the refresh signal AREF. In some embodiments, responsive to an activation of AREF, the refresh control circuit 116 may generate one or more activations of a pump signal, and may generate and provide a refresh address RXADD for each activation of the pump signal (e.g., each pump).
One type of refresh operation may be an auto-refresh operation. Responsive to an auto-refresh operation the memory bank may refresh a word line or a group of word lines of the memory, and then may refresh a next word line or group of word lines of the memory bank responsive to a next auto-refresh operation. The refresh control circuit 116 may provide an auto-refresh address as the refresh address RXADD which indicates a word line or a group of word lines in the memory bank. The refresh control circuit 116 may generate a sequence of refresh addresses RXADD such that over time the auto-refresh operation may cycle through all the word lines WL of the memory bank. The timing of refresh operations may be such that each word line is refreshed with a frequency based, at least in part, on a normal rate of data degradation in the memory cells (e.g., auto-refresh rate).
Another type of refresh operation may be a targeted refresh operation. As mentioned previously, repeated access to a particular word line of memory (e.g., an aggressor word line) may cause an increased rate of decay in neighboring word lines (e.g., victim word lines) due, for example, to electromagnetic coupling between the word lines. In some embodiments, the victim word lines may include word lines which are physically adjacent to the aggressor word line. In some embodiments, the victim word lines may include word lines further away from the aggressor word line. Information in the victim word line may decay at a rate such that data may be lost if they are not refreshed before the next auto-refresh operation of that word line. In order to prevent information from being lost, it may be necessary to identify aggressor word lines and then carry out a targeted refresh operation where a refresh address RXADD associated with one or more associated victim word lines is refreshed.
The refresh control circuit 116 may selectively output a targeted refresh address (e.g., a victim row address) or an automatic refresh address (e.g., auto-refresh address) as the refresh address RXADD. The auto-refresh addresses may be from a sequence of addresses which are provided based on activations of the auto-refresh signal AREF. The refresh control circuit 116 may cycle through the sequence of auto-refresh addresses at a rate determined by AREF. In some embodiments, the sequence of auto-refresh addresses may be generated by updating (e.g., incrementing) one or more portions of the previous auto-refresh address.
The refresh control circuit 116 may also determine targeted refresh addresses which are addresses that require refreshing (e.g., victim row addresses corresponding to victim word lines) based on the access pattern of nearby addresses (e.g., aggressor row addresses corresponding to aggressor word lines) in the memory array 112. The refresh control circuit 116 may selectively use one or more signals of the device 100 to calculate the refresh address RXADD. For example, the refresh address RXADD may be calculated based on the row addresses XADD provided by the address decoder circuit 104. The refresh control circuit 116 may receive the current value of the row address XADD provided by the address decoder circuit 104 and determine a targeted refresh address based on one or more of the received addresses.
The refresh address RXADD may be provided with a timing based on a timing of the refresh signal AREF. The refresh control circuit 116 may have time slots corresponding to the timing of AREF, and may provide one or more refresh addresses RXADD during each time slot. In some embodiments, a targeted refresh address may be issued in a time slot which would otherwise have been assigned to an auto-refresh address (e.g., “steal”). In some embodiments, certain time slots may be reserved for targeted refresh addresses. These time slots may be referred to as targeted refresh time slots. The time period between time slots reserved for targeted refresh addresses may be referred to as the targeted refresh rate or steal rate. As the number of time slots assigned to targeted refreshes increases, the steal rate increases, and the effective auto-refresh rate decreases. In some embodiments, the number of time slots assigned to targeted refreshes is constant. In some embodiments, the refresh control circuit 116 may determine whether to provide a targeted refresh address, not provide an address during that time slot, or provide an auto-refresh address instead during the time slot. Thus, in some embodiments, the steal rate may not be constant over time.
The refresh control circuit 116 may receive the row addresses XADD provided by the address decoder circuit 104 and may determine which word lines are being hammered based on the row addresses XADD. The refresh control circuit 116 may count accesses to the word lines based on the row address XADD and may determine which word lines are aggressors based on the count of the accesses (e.g., reach a threshold value). The row addresses XADD and access count values may be stored by the refresh control circuit 116. In some embodiments, the refresh control circuit 116 may further store victim data associated with victim word lines associated with the word line corresponding to the row address XADD. For example, a flag for R+1, R−1, R+2, and/or R−2 may be stored. These may be referred to as victim flags. When the row address XADD is stored, the victim data may be set to a first value (e.g., the victim flags may be set to a first logic level). In some embodiments, once a victim word line has been refreshed (e.g., healed), the victim data associated with that victim word line may be set to a second value (e.g., the victim flag may be set to a second logic level).
In some embodiments, when an access count value reaches a threshold value, one or more victim row addresses associated with victim word lines of the word line associated with the row address XADD may be calculated by the refresh control circuit 116. The victim row addresses calculated may be based, at least in part, on the victim data. For example, if the access count value reaches a threshold value, and victim data for all of the victim rows are equal to the first value, all victim row addresses corresponding to word lines that are victims of the word line associated with the row address XADD may be determined. In another example, if only some of the victim data is equal to the first value, only the victim row addresses corresponding to word lines associated with the victim data equal to the first value are determined. Victim row addresses for victim data equal to the second state may not be determined. In some embodiments, the victim row address may be provided to a targeted address queue for refreshing during targeted refresh time slots (e.g., sequential targeted refresh time slots). After refreshing the victim word lines, the victim data associated with those word lines may be set to the second value. Continuing this example, the access count value associated with the row address XADD may be reduced or reset (e.g., set to zero).
In some embodiments, the refresh control circuit 116 may determine if victim word lines have been ‘healed’ by targeted refreshes, auto-refreshes, and/or a memory access operation (e.g., read, write) and adjust victim data associated with the victim word line accordingly. For example, in some embodiments, the refresh control circuit 116 may calculate aggressor row addresses based on the refresh address RXADD and/or row address XADD. The aggressor row addresses may correspond to aggressor word lines of a victim word line associated with the refresh address RXADD or row address XADD. The calculated aggressor row addresses may be compared to the stored row addresses. If one or more matches is found amongst the stored row addresses, the victim data corresponding to the word line associated with RXADD and/or XADD may be set to the second (e.g., healed) value. In some embodiments, an auto-refresh address and/or XADD may be compared to victim data, such as victim row addresses in a queue to be refreshed. If one of the victim row addresses matches the auto-refresh address and/or XADD, the victim row address is removed from the queue. Thus, the removed victim row address will not be refreshed in a targeted refresh operation. Accordingly, the word line associated with RXADD and XADD may not be refreshed multiple times due to its association with multiple aggressor word lines or when it is healed by other mechanisms (e.g., access operation, auto-refresh).
The power supply terminals are supplied with power supply potentials VDD and VSS. The power supply potentials VDD and VSS are supplied to an internal voltage generator circuit 128. The internal voltage generator circuit 128 generates various internal potentials VPP, VOD, VARY, VPERI, and the like based on the power supply potentials VDD and VSS supplied to the power supply terminals. The internal potential VPP is mainly used in the row decoder circuit 108, the internal potentials VOD and VARY are mainly used in the sense amplifiers SAMP included in the memory array 118, and the internal potential VPERI is used in many peripheral circuit blocks.
The power supply terminals are also supplied with power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ. The power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ are supplied to the input/output circuit 126. The power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ supplied to the power supply terminals may be the same potentials as the power supply potentials VDD and VSS supplied to the power supply terminals in an embodiment of the disclosure. The power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ supplied to the power supply terminals may be different potentials from the power supply potentials VDD and VSS supplied to the power supply terminals in another embodiment of the disclosure. The power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ supplied to the power supply terminals are used for the input/output circuit 122 so that power supply noise generated by the input/output circuit 126 does not propagate to the other circuit blocks.
A DRAM interface 226 may provide one or more signals to an address refresh control circuit 216 and row decoder circuit 208. The refresh control circuit 216 may include an aggressor row detector circuit 230 (e.g., AGR row detector), a row hammer refresh (RHR) state control 236, a refresh address generator 234, and a reverse scrambler 246. The DRAM interface 226 may provide one or more control signals, such as an auto-refresh signal AREF, and a row address XADD.
The DRAM interface 226 may represent one or more components which provides signals to components of the bank 218. In some embodiments, the DRAM interface 226 may represent a memory controller coupled to the semiconductor memory device (e.g., device 100 of
The AGR row detector 230 may receive the current row address XADD. In some embodiments, the AGR row detector 230 may store the current value of the row address XADD, and/or determine if the current row address XADD is an aggressor address based on one or more previously stored row addresses. For example, in some embodiments, the AGR row detector 230 may determine if a row address is an aggressor address based on a number of times the row address XADD is received (e.g., the number of times the corresponding word line is accessed). In other embodiments, the AGR row detector 230 may determine that a row address with a highest access count value is an aggressor row address, regardless of the access count value. The AGR row detector 230 may further store victim data for victim word lines associated with the stored row addresses. For example, the AGR row detector 230 may store flags associated with each victim word line. The AGR row detector 230 may provide one or more of the addresses to the refresh address generator 232 as the matched address HitXADD. The match address HitXADD may represent an aggressor word line. In some embodiments, the AGR row detector 230 may further provide victim data, such as one or more flags FLAGS, as will be described in more detail, associated with the matched address HitXADD.
The row address XADD may change as the DRAM interface 226 directs access operations (e.g., read and write operations) to different rows of the memory cell array (e.g., memory cell array 118 of
The RHR state control 236 may control the timing of targeted refresh operations. The RHR state control 236 may provide the row hammer refresh signal RHR to indicate that a targeted refresh (e.g., a refresh of the victim rows corresponding to an identified aggressor row) should occur. The RHR state control 236 may also provide an internal refresh signal IREF, to indicate that an auto-refresh should occur. Responsive to an activation of RHR, the refresh address generator 232 may provide a refresh address RXADD, which may be an auto-refresh address or may be one or more victim addresses corresponding to victim word lines of the aggressor word line corresponding to the match address HitXADD. The victim rows address may be based, at least in part, on the victim flags FLAGS provided by the AGR row detector 230. The row decoder circuit 208 may perform a targeted refresh operation responsive to the refresh address RXADD and the row hammer refresh signal RHR. The row decoder circuit 208 may perform an auto-refresh operation based on the refresh address RXADD and the internal refresh signal IREF. In some embodiments, the row decoder circuit 208 may receive the auto-refresh signal AREF provided by the DRAM interface 226, and the internal refresh signal IREF may not be used.
The RHR state control 236 may receive the auto-refresh signal AREF and provide the row hammer refresh signal RHR and the internal refresh signal IREF. The auto-refresh signal AREF may be periodically generated and may be used to control the timing of refresh operations. The memory device may carry out a sequence of auto-refresh operations in order to periodically refresh the rows of the memory device. The RHR signal may be generated in order to indicate that a particular targeted row address should be refreshed instead of an address from the sequence of auto-refresh addresses. For example, if an access count value associated with a row address XADD has reached or exceeded a threshold value. The RHR state control 236 may use internal logic to provide the RHR signal. In some embodiments, the RHR state control 236 may provide the RHR signal based on certain number of activations of AREF (e.g., every 4th activation of AREF). The RHR state control 236 may also provide an internal refresh signal IREF, which may indicate that an auto-refresh operation should take place. In some embodiments, the signals RHR and IREF may be generated such that they are not active at the same time (e.g., are not both at a high logic level at the same time).
Focusing now on the refresh address generator 232, the refresh address generator 232 may include an auto-refresh address generator 234 (AREF address generator), an address scrambler 238, a targeted address queue 240, a multiplexer 242, and a control logic circuit 244. In some embodiments, refresh address generator 232 may further include reverse scrambler 246. The refresh address generator 232 provides either an auto-refresh address Pre_RXADD or a victim address HitXADD2 based on match address HitXADD as the refresh address RXADD.
The AREF address generator 234 generates an auto-refresh address Pre_RXADD in response to the refresh signal AREF. The auto-refresh address Pre_RXADD may be part of a sequence of addresses to be refreshed as part of an auto-refresh operation. The AREF address generator 234 may update the current auto-refresh address Pre_RXADD to a next address in the sequence in response to an active refresh signal AREF. The AREF address generator 234 is also provided the command signal RHR from RHR state control 236. When the command signal RHR is active, the AREF address generator 234 may be controlled to stop updating the automatic refresh address Pre_RXADD even if the automatic refresh signal AREF is active in some embodiments. As described herein, since the active command signal RHR indicates that a targeted refresh operation is to be conducted instead of an automatic refresh operation, this allows the automatic refresh operation to be suspended while the targeted refresh is carried out, and resumed when the command signal RHR is not active. However, as will be described in more detail, an active Empty signal provided by the targeted address queue 240 may override the command signal RHR to prevent suspension of the automatic refresh operation in some embodiments.
The address scrambler 238 calculates one or more addresses to be refreshed based on aggressor row addresses identified by the AGR row detector 230 (e.g. row addresses XADD associated with count values above a threshold value) and the state of the victim data, such as victim flags FLAGS provided by the AGR row detector 230. The address scrambler 238 may be provided the match address HitXADD and the victim data as inputs. The address scrambler 238 may provide a targeted refresh address HitXADD1 in response to these inputs. The targeted refresh address HitXADD1 may be an address for a memory location (e.g., a word line) that may be affected by repeated activation of the memory location corresponding to the match address HitXADD. In other words, the match address HitXADD may be an ‘aggressor’ address, and the targeted refresh address HitXADD1 may be a ‘victim’ address. Different calculations may be used for generating different victim addresses as the targeted refresh address HitXADD1.
The address scrambler 238 may employ different calculations to determine victim row addresses based on the state of the victim data, such as victim flags FLAGS. In one example, a first calculation may be used for the victim flags in the first state corresponding to victim word lines having a first physical relationship with the aggressor word line associated with the match address HitXADD (e.g., physically adjacent to the aggressor word line). A second calculation may be used for the victim flags in the first state corresponding to victim word lines having a second physical relationship with the aggressor word line associated with the match address HitXADD (e.g., physically adjacent to victim word lines physically adjacent to the aggressor word line). The calculations may provide targeted refresh addresses HitXADD1 corresponding to word lines which have a known physical relationship (e.g., a spatial relationship) with a word line corresponding to the match address HitXADD. The calculations may result in a single targeted refresh address HitXADD1 in some embodiments of the disclosure, for example, when only one victim flag is in the first (e.g., non-healed) state. The calculations may result in a sequence of targeted refresh addresses HitXADD1 in other embodiments of the disclosure, for example, when multiple victim flags are in the first state. In some embodiments, the address scrambler 238 may not calculate victim row addresses for victim word lines associated with victim data (e.g., victim flag) associated with a healed state (e.g., second logic level).
In one embodiment, the first calculation may cause the address scrambler 238 to output addresses which correspond to word lines that are adjacent to the word line corresponding to the match address HitXADD (e.g., HitXADD1=HitXADD+/−1). The second calculation may cause the address scrambler 238 to output addresses which correspond to word lines that are adjacent to word lines corresponding to the addresses HitXADD+/−1 (e.g., HitXADD1+/−2). Other calculations are possible in other example embodiments. For example, the first calculation may be based on a physical relationship with the match address HitXADD1, while the second calculation may be based on a physical relationship with the address(es) provided by the first calculation. The targeted addresses HitXADD1 calculated by the address scrambler 238 may be provided to a targeted address queue 240 in some embodiments.
The targeted address queue 240 may receive targeted refresh address HitXADD1 from address scrambler 238 and provide the targeted refresh address HitXADD2 based on the targeted refresh address HitXADD1. Targeted address queue 240 may store one or more targeted refresh addresses HitXADD1 received from the address scrambler 238. In some embodiments, the targeted address queue 240 may compare the victim row addresses HitXADD1 to the current victim row addresses stored in the queue. If the victim row address HitXADD1 is already in the queue, the victim row address HitXADD1 is not added. Access count values for multiple row addresses may meet or exceed the threshold value between targeted refresh time slots. Furthermore, each row address may be associated with multiple victim row addresses. In some embodiments, the victim row addresses (e.g., HitXADD1) may be stored in the targeted address queue 240 for refreshing during sequential targeted refresh time slots. The targeted address queue 240 may be a “first-in-first-out” queue in some embodiments. In some embodiments, the targeted address queue 240 may include a plurality of registers. However, other storage structures may be used. In some embodiments, the targeted address queue 240 may have a pointer that points to a victim row address to be output as targeted refresh address HitXADD2. Responsive to an active command signal RHR, the pointer may be incremented to the next victim row address in the queue and the next victim row address may be output as HitXADD2. In some embodiments, the targeted address queue 240 may clear a register once the victim row address stored in the register is provided as HitXADD2. In some embodiments, the targeted address queue 240 may use a flag to indicate a victim row address has been provided as HitXADD2. Clearing the register and/or setting flags may allow the targeted address queue 240 to determine when a register is available for rewriting and/or the queue is empty. Other techniques for controlling the queue and determining the status of the queue may also be used. If the targeted address queue 240 determines the queue of victim row addresses is empty, the targeted address queue 240 may activate an Empty signal.
The multiplexer 242 accepts the automatic refresh address Pre_RXADD provided by the AREF address generator 234 and the targeted refresh address HitXADD2 provided by the targeted address queue 240 and outputs one of them as the refresh address RXADD. The multiplexer 242 may select between the two refresh addresses based on the command signal RHR and Empty signal. Control logic circuit 244 is provided the command signals RHR and Empty and an output is provided to the multiplexer 242 to control selection of providing the Pre_RXADD or HitXADD2 addresses as the refresh address RXADD. The control logic circuit 244 outputs a first logic level if command signal RHR is active and Empty is inactive. The multiplexer 242 outputs the targeted address HitXADD2 in response to the first logic level. If command signal RHR is inactive, the control logic circuit 244 may output a second logic level regardless of the Empty signal. The multiplexer 242 outputs the automatic refresh address Pre_RXADD in response to the second logic level. If the command signal RHR is active, but the Empty signal is active (e.g., the targeted address queue 240 is empty), the control logic circuit 244 may output the second logic level and the multiplexer 242 may output the automatic refresh address Pre_RXADD. As mentioned previously, the active Empty command may override the command signal RHR provided to the AREF address generator 234, so a current Pre_RXADD is provided. Thus, even during a targeted refresh interval, if no victim rows require refreshing, an automatic refresh operation may be performed. However, in other embodiments, if no victim row address is available, the refresh address generator 232 may not provide a refresh address RXADD, and no refresh operation may be performed during a targeted refresh time slot.
A refreshed word line (e.g., a word line corresponding to refresh address RXADD) may be a potential victim of multiple aggressor word lines. For example, two potential aggressor word lines may be directly adjacent on opposite sides of the refreshed word line. If the row addresses corresponding to both aggressor word lines are stored in the AGR row detector 230, there may be victim data corresponding to the refreshed word line associated with both row addresses. For example, a given word line may be associated with the R+1 victim flag of one row address and the R−1 victim flag of another row address. Thus, if the refreshed word line is refreshed based on the victim data associated with one row address and also refreshed again based on the victim data associated with the other row address then the word line may be refreshed more often than necessary. In some applications, this may cause the steal rate to be set higher than necessary.
Furthermore, similar to a refreshed word line, an accessed word line may be a victim of one or more word lines corresponding to row addresses stored in the AGR row detector 230. When a word line is accessed during a memory access operation (e.g., activation, read, write), the data in the word line is also refreshed. Accordingly, in some instances, if a word line corresponding to a row address XADD is accessed and then subsequently refreshed based on the victim data associated with row addresses stored in the AGR row detector 230 then the accessed word line is refreshed despite the access operation rendering moot the need for a refresh operation. In some applications, this may cause the steal rate to be set higher than necessary.
In some embodiments, the refresh address generator 232 may include a reverse scrambler 246 to determine potential aggressor row addresses (e.g., aggressor row addresses) associated with the refresh address RXADD or accessed row address XADD. That is, the refresh address generator 232 may determine aggressor word lines physically adjacent to the word line (e.g., RXADD+1 and RXADD−1 or XADD+1 and XADD−1) and/or word lines which are physically adjacent to the physically adjacent word lines of the word line (e.g., RXADD+2 and RXADD−2 or XADD+2 and XADD−2). The calculated aggressor row addresses AXADD may be provided to the AGR row detector 230 and compared to the row addresses XADD stored in the AGR row detector 230. If an aggressor row address AXADD matches, the appropriate victim data (e.g., the victim flag) associated with the matching row address XADD may be set to a state indicating the victim word line has been healed (and/or that a refresh is no longer necessary). This may reduce unnecessary refreshes of victim word lines that are victims of one or more word lines corresponding to row addresses stored in the AGR row detector 230.
Different calculations may be used for generating different aggressor row addresses AXADD. The calculations may result in an aggressor address AXADD in some embodiments of the disclosure. The calculations may result in a sequence of aggressor row addresses AXADD in other embodiments of the disclosure. In other words, the reverse scrambler 246 may determine row addresses for all of the word lines that could cause the word line corresponding to RXADD or XADD to become a victim word line.
In some embodiments, the reverse scrambler 246 and address scrambler 238 may have the same or similar circuitry. For example, both the reverse scrambler 246 and address scrambler 238 calculate row addresses based on physical relationships between word lines. However, the input addresses provided to the address scrambler 238 and reverse scrambler 246 are different as described above. In some embodiments, not shown in
In some embodiments, the reverse scrambler 246 may only receive the refresh address RXADD or the accessed row address XADD for calculating aggressor row addresses AXADD. While these embodiments may provide less feedback for adjusting the victim data in the AGR row detector 230, calculating aggressor row addresses AXADD for only the refresh address RXADD or accessed row address XADD may reduce a number of computations and/or comparisons, which may in turn reduce power consumption and/or computing time.
In some embodiments, other victim data in the refresh control circuit 216 may be adjusted in addition to—or instead of—the victim data stored in the AGR row detector 230. For example, victim data may include victim row addresses. In some embodiments, victim row addresses stored in the targeted address queue 240 may be adjusted. In some embodiments, the targeted address queue 240 may receive the auto-refresh address Pre_RXADD and/or the accessed row address XADD. The targeted address queue 240 may compare the auto-refresh address Pre_RXADD and/or row address XADD to the victim row addresses stored in the queue. If a match is found, the victim row address may be removed from the queue as the victim word line associated with the victim row address was already healed by an access or auto-refresh operation. Thus, by removing the victim row address, the victim data is adjusted to indicate the victim word line associated with the victim row address has been healed.
In some applications, adjusting the victim row addresses stored in the targeted address queue 240 may be advantageous because no “reverse” calculation of aggressor row addresses is required. However, in some applications, adjusting victim data in the AGR row detector 230 may be advantageous because it may reduce unnecessary victim row address calculations performed by the address scrambler 238. In some applications, it may be advantageous to adjust victim data in the targeted address queue 240 and victim data in the AGR row detector to reduce unnecessary targeted refresh operations.
The row decoder circuit 208 may perform one or more operations on the memory array (not shown) based on the received signals and addresses. For example, responsive to the activation signal ACT and the row address XADD (and IREF and RHR being at a low logic level), the row decoder circuit 208 may direct one or more access operations (for example, a read operation) on the specified row address XADD. Responsive to the RHR signal being active, the row decoder circuit 208 may refresh the refresh address RXADD.
The fields 304 may receive a row address XADD. In some embodiments, the fields 304 may receive row address XADD from an address decoder circuit, such as address decoder circuit 104 shown in
In some embodiments, each time a row address XADD is provided, the current row address XADD may be compared to the fields 304. In other embodiments, as mentioned previously, rather than storing each row address XADD received, the stack 310 may store the row address XADD responsive to a sampling signal (not shown). In these embodiments, only row addresses XADD received while the sampling signal is active are compared to the fields 304. If the current row address XADD is already stored in one of the registers 302, then the access count value in field 306 may be adjusted (e.g., increased). If the current row address XADD is not already stored in one of the registers 302, it may be added to the register 302 in field 304. If there is an open register (e.g., a register without a row address) then the row address XADD may be stored in the open register. If there is not an open register, then the register 302 associated with the lowest count value (as indicated by the pointers 316) may have its row address replaced with the current row address XADD. When a new row address is written to a register 302, the victim flags may be set to a first state indicating that none of the associated victim word lines have been refreshed and the counter may be reset to an initial value (e.g., 0) in some embodiments.
A victim word line may be a victim based on multiple aggressor word lines, thus, when a victim word line is refreshed, it may be associated with multiple victim flags in the register 302. Calculating the aggressor row addresses and comparing them to the row addresses stored in the register 302 may reduce redundant victim row refreshes in some applications. In some embodiments, the stack 310 may receive aggressor row addresses AXADD. The aggressor row addresses AXADD may be based, at least in part, on a refresh address RXADD or a received row address XADD. In some embodiments, the aggressor row address AXADD may correspond to word lines that may victimize a word line corresponding to RXADD or XADD. The aggressor row addresses AXADD may be compared to the fields 304. If the aggressor row addresses AXADD do not match any of the stored row addresses, no action is taken by the stack 310. If the aggressor row addresses AXADD match one or more row addresses, the appropriate victim flag or flags stored in field 308 may be set to a state indicating that the victim word line has been healed by victim data logic circuit 318 as will be described in more detail with reference to
In some embodiments, the comparator circuit 312 may compare the access count values in fields 306 to a threshold value to determine if an access count value for a row address has matched or exceeded the threshold value (e.g., 1,000, 2,000, 3,000). In some embodiments, the comparator circuit 312 may further compare the access count values to determine which row address is associated with the lowest access count value. The fields 306 corresponding to the minimum count value and count values that meet or exceed the threshold value may be provided to a counter scrambler 314, which may match the above threshold value fields and minimum count value field to their respective associated row address fields 304. The pointers 316 may point to the row addresses in fields 304 associated with count values at or above the threshold value and may point to the field 304 associated with the minimum count value in fields 306. The threshold value pointer(s) may be used to provide the corresponding row address(es) as HitXADD and the corresponding victim flags as VFLAG to the refresh address generator. When a target refresh operation is carried out based on the address HitXADD, some or all of the victim flags may be set to a second state indicating the corresponding victim word lines have been refreshed. If all of the victim flags are set to the second state (e.g., all victim word lines have been refreshed), the access count value may be reset. The minimum count value pointer may be used to overwrite a register 302 when a new row address XADD is received and there is no open register 302 to store it in.
In other embodiments, the comparator circuit 312 may compare the count values to determine which row address is associated with the highest access count value. The field 306 corresponding to the highest count value may be provided to the count scrambler 314, which may match the highest count value field to its associated row address field 304. The highest count value pointer 316 may be used to provide the corresponding row address as HitXADD, and the corresponding victim flags as VFLAG to the refresh address generator.
The CAM cell 400 includes a latch portion 402 and a comparator portion 404. The CAM cell 400 may generally use voltages to represent the values of various bits. The CAM cell 400 may include conductive elements (e.g., nodes, conductive lines) which carry a voltage representing a logical value of that bit. For example, a high logical level may be represented by a first voltage (e.g., a system voltage such as VPERI), while a low logical level may be represented by a second voltage (e.g., a ground voltage, such as VSS).
The latch portion 402 includes a first transistor 406 which has a source coupled to a node which provides a voltage VPERI, which may represent a high logical level. The first transistor 406 has a drain coupled to a node 417 having a voltage which represents the value of the signal Q and a gate coupled to a node 419 having a voltage which represents a value of the complementary signal QF. The signal Q represents the logical level of a bit stored in the latch portion 402. The first transistor 406 may be a p-type transistor. The latch portion 402 also includes a second transistor 407 which has a source coupled to the node which provides VPERI, a gate coupled to the node 417 and a drain coupled to the node 419. The second transistor 407 may be a p-type transistor.
The latch portion 402 includes a third transistor 408 which has a drain coupled to the node 417, a gate coupled to the node 419, and a source coupled to a node providing a ground voltage VSS, which may represent a low logical level. The third transistor 408 may be an n-type transistor. The latch portion 402 includes a fourth transistor 409 which has a drain coupled to the node 419, a gate coupled to the node 417, and a source coupled to the node providing the ground voltage VSS. The fourth transistor 409 may be an n-type transistor. The transistors 406 and 408 may form an inverter circuit and the transistors 407 and 409 may form another inverter circuit, and the two inverter circuits are cross-coupled to one another.
In operation, the first, second, third, and fourth transistors 406-409 may work to store the value of the stored signals Q and QF. The transistors 406-409 may work together to couple the node 417 carrying Q and the node 619 carrying QF to a node providing the system voltage (e.g., VPERI or VSS) associated with the value of the signals Q and QF. For example, if the stored signal Q is at a high logical level, then the inverse signal QF is at a low logical level. The first transistor 406 may be active, and VPERI may be coupled to the node 417. The second transistor 407 and the third transistor 408 may be inactive. The fourth transistor 409 may be active and may couple VSS to the node 419. This may keep the node 417 at a voltage of VPERI, which represents a high logical level, and the node 419 at a voltage of VSS, which represents a low logical level. In another example, if the stored signal Q is at a low logical level, then the inverse signal QF may be at a high logical level. The first transistor 406 and the fourth transistor 409 may both be inactive. The second transistor 407 may be active and may couple VPERI to the node 419. The third transistor 408 may also be active and may couple VSS to the node 417. In this manner, the stored signal Q and QF may be coupled to a respective system voltage corresponding to their current logical levels, which may maintain the current logical value of the stored bit.
The latch portion 402 also includes a fifth transistor 410 and a sixth transistor 411. The transistors 410 and 411 may act as switches which may couple a signal line which carries input data D and a signal line carrying inverse input data DF to the nodes 417 and 419 carrying Q and QF respectively when a write signal Write is active. The fifth transistor 410 has a gate coupled to a line carrying the Write signal, a drain coupled to the signal D, and a source coupled to the node 419. The sixth transistor 411 has a gate coupled to the Write signal, a drain coupled to the signal DF, and a source coupled to the node 419. Accordingly, when the Write signal is at a high level (e.g., at a voltage such as VPERI), the transistors 410 and 411 may be active, and the voltages of the signals D and DF may be coupled to the nodes 417 and 419 carrying Q and QF respectively.
In some embodiments, the first through sixth transistors 406-411 may generally all be the same size as each other.
The CAM cell 400 also includes a comparator portion 404. The comparator portion 404 may compare the signals Q and QF to the signals X_Compare and XF_Compare. The signal X_Compare may represent a logical level of an external bit provided to the comparator portion 404. If there is not a match between the signals Q and X_Compare (and therefore between QF and XF_Compare), then the comparator portion 404 may change a state of from the BitMatch signal from a first logical level (e.g., a high logical level) to a second logical level (e.g., a low logical level). For example, if the stored and external bits do not match, the comparator portion 404 may couple the ground voltage VSS to a signal line carrying the signal BitMatch. In some embodiments, if there is a match between the stored and external bits, then the comparator portion 404 may do nothing. In some embodiments, the signal BitMatch may be precharged to a voltage associated with a high logical level (e.g., VPERI) before a comparison operation.
The comparator portion includes a seventh transistor 412, an eighth transistors 413, a ninth transistor 414, and a tenth transistor 415. The seventh transistor 412 includes a drain coupled to the signal BitMatch, a gate coupled to the node 417 (e.g., the signal Q), and a source coupled to a drain of the ninth transistor 414. The ninth transistor 414 also has agate coupled to the signal XF_Compare and a source coupled to a signal line providing the ground voltage VSS.
The eighth transistor 413 has a drain coupled to the signal BitMatch, a gate coupled to the node 419 (e.g., the signal QF), and a source coupled to a drain of the tenth transistor 415. The tenth transistor has a gate coupled to the signal X_Compare and a source coupled to the ground voltage VSS.
Since the signal Q is complementary to the signal QF, the comparator portion 402 may operate by comparing the external signal X_Compare to the signal QF to see if they match, and the inverse external signal XF_Compare to the stored signal Q to see if they match. If they do match, it may indicate that the signal X_Compare does not match the signal Q and that the signal XF_Compare does not match the signal QF, and thus that the external bits do not match the associated stored bits.
The comparator portion 404 may use relatively few components, since it changes the signal BitMatch from a known state (e.g., a precharged high logical level) to a low logical level. Thus, it may not be necessary to include additional components (e.g., additional transistors) to change the logical level of the signal BitMatch from low to high, or from an unknown level to either low or high. The comparator portion 404 may take advantage of this to provide dynamic logic. For example, the comparator portion 404 has two portions (e.g., transistors 412/414 and transistors 414/415) either of which may couple the signal BitLine to the voltage VSS if there is not a match between the stored and external bit. Since only one of the portions is active at a time, only the state of the signal Q or QF needs to be checked by the active portion. Either of the portions is equally capable of changing the signal BitMatch to a low logical level.
In an example operation, if the stored signal Q is at a high logical level (and thus the signal QF is low) and the external signal X_Compare is also high (and the signal XF_Compare is low), then the external signals may match the stored signals, and the transistors 412 and 415 may be active while the transistors 414 and 413 are inactive. This may prevent the ground voltage VSS from being coupled to the signal BitMatch. If the signal X_Compare is low (e.g., if there is not a match), then the external signals may not match the stored signals, and the transistors 412 and 414 may be active wile transistors 413 and 415 are inactive. The transistors 412 and 414 being active at the same time may couple the ground voltage VSS to the signal BitMatch.
In another example operation if the stored signal Q is low (and thus the signal QF is high) then the transistor 412 may be inactive while the transistor 413 is active. If the external signal X_Compare is low (and XF_Compare is high) then the external signal may match the stored bits, and the transistor 414 is active while transistor 415 is inactive. If the signal X_Compare is high (and the signal XF_Compare is low) then the external signal may not match the stored signal and the transistor 414 may be inactive while the transistor 415 is active. Accordingly, the signal BitMatch may be coupled to ground voltage VSS through active transistors 413 and 415.
In some embodiments, the transistors 412-415 of the comparator portion 404 may generally all have the same size to each other. In some embodiments, the transistors 412-415 of the comparator portion 404 may be a different size than the transistors 406-411 of the latch portions 402.
As discussed previously, a word line may be a victim of multiple aggressor word lines. For example, a victim word line may be a victim due to a row hammer on an adjacent aggressor word line on either side of the victim word line. Thus, the victim word line may potentially be the victim to two different aggressor word lines. In another example, the victim word line may also be a victim due to a row hammer on aggressor word lines adjacent to the word lines adjacent to the victim word line on either side. Thus, the victim word line may be a potential victim of four different aggressor word lines. However, even though the victim word line may be a victim due to concurrent or near concurrent (e.g., at or near the same time) row hammers on multiple word lines, the victim word line may only need to be ‘healed’ (e.g., refreshed) once to preserve data in the victim word line. Furthermore, if the victim word line is accessed during a memory operation, such as during a read or write operation, the accessing may heal the victim word line.
As described with reference to
Victim data stored in a stack, such as stack 310 in
The reverse scrambler 500 may receive a row address XADD and/or a refresh address RXADD. In some embodiments, the row address XADD may be received from an address decoder circuit, such as address decoder circuit 104 shown in
Each aggressor row address generator 502 may determine a row address (AXADD0-3) of one aggressor word line having a different physical relationship to a victim word line associated with the refresh address RXADD and/or row address XADD. In the example shown in
The aggressor row address generators 502 may determine the aggressor row address in a variety of ways. For example, in some embodiments, the aggressor row generators 502 may refer to a look-up table to determine the aggressor row addresses associated with the row address XADD and/or refresh address RXADD. In another example, in some embodiments, the aggressor row generators 502 may include logic gates or other circuit components for carrying out a conversion between the victim row address and the aggressor row addresses. The conversion may be based on a relationship between physical word line locations and row addresses in a design of the memory. Each aggressor row address generator 502 may output an aggressor row address AXADD0-3. In some embodiments, the aggressor row addresses may be provided on separate output lines as shown in
All of the aggressor row addresses AXADD0-3 calculated by the reverse scrambler 500 may be provided to the aggressor row detector circuit 504. Specifically, the aggressor row addresses AXADD0-3 may be compared to row addresses stored in the address fields 506 of a stack. In some embodiments, each aggressor row address AXADD0-3 may be compared to the row addresses stored in the address fields 506 sequentially (e.g., in series). In other embodiments, all of the aggressor row addresses may be compared to the row addresses stored in the address fields 506 at the same time (e.g., in parallel). If no matches are found between the aggressor row addresses AXADD0-3 and the stored row addresses in the address fields 506, no further action is taken by the aggressor row detector 504. If a match between one or more of the aggressor row addresses AXADD0-3 and one or more row addresses in the address fields 506, shown as MatchADD in
Although shown as a single line in
Responsive to the active match signal and register indication, the victim data logic circuit 508 may adjust the victim data to indicate the corresponding victim word line has been healed. For example, the victim data logic circuit 508 may set the appropriate victim flag V0-3 stored in a victim flag field 510 associated with the row address MatchADD to a healed state (e.g., reset, set to the second state). Continuing with the example above, when the victim data logic circuit 508 receives the active Match2 signal, the victim data logic circuit 508 may set the victim flag V2 stored in victim flag field 510 to a healed state. For example, if victim flag V2 was a ‘1’ indicating the word line associated with the victim flag had not been healed, the victim data logic circuit 508 may change victim flag V2 to a ‘0’ indicating the word line associated with the victim flag had been healed. Thus, in some embodiments, when a word line corresponding to RXADD or XADD is refreshed or accessed, all of the victim flags associated with the word line in the aggressor row detector 504 may be adjusted to indicate the data in the word line has been healed. This may reduce unnecessary refreshes of the word line corresponding to RXADD and XADD in some embodiments.
While the examples described in
At block 606, a step of “calculating at least one aggressor row address” may be performed. In some embodiments, the aggressor row address may be based on a refresh address or an accessed row address. In some embodiments, the refresh address may be provided by a refresh address generator, such as refresh address generator 232 of
In some embodiments, the method shown in flow chart 600 may further include storing a count value associated with the row address in the register. In some embodiments, the register may be included in a stack, such as stack 310 shown in
In some embodiments, a method may include comparing an auto-refresh address or an accessed row address to one or more victim row addresses stored in a queue. If the auto-refresh address or accessed row address does not match the one or more victim row addresses, no action is taken. If the auto-refresh address or accessed row address matches the one or more victim row addresses, the matching one or more victim row addresses is removed from the queue.
The apparatuses and methods described herein may allow for adjusting the victim word line data associated with accessed row addresses. For example, the victim word line data may be adjusted to indicate that victim word lines have already been healed. Adjusting the victim word line data as described herein may reduce the number of unnecessary refresh operations in some applications.
Of course, it is to be appreciated that any one of the examples, embodiments or processes described herein may be combined with one or more other examples, embodiments and/or processes or be separated and/or performed amongst separate devices or device portions in accordance with the present systems, devices and methods.
Finally, the above-discussion is intended to be merely illustrative of the present system and should not be construed as limiting the appended claims to any particular embodiment or group of embodiments. Thus, while the present system has been described in particular detail with reference to exemplary embodiments, it should also be appreciated that numerous modifications and alternative embodiments may be devised by those having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the broader and intended spirit and scope of the present system as set forth in the claims that follow. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative manner and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/459,507 filed Jul. 1, 2019 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,832,792 on Nov. 10, 2020. The aforementioned application, and issued patent, is incorporated herein by reference, in its entirety, for any purpose.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1158364 | Bibb | Oct 1915 | A |
3633175 | Harper | Jan 1972 | A |
5291198 | Dingwall et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299159 | Balistreri et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5422850 | Sukegawa et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5638317 | Tran | Jun 1997 | A |
5699297 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5768196 | Bloker et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5933377 | Hidaka | Aug 1999 | A |
5943283 | Wong et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5970507 | Kato et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999471 | Choi | Dec 1999 | A |
6002629 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011734 | Pappert | Jan 2000 | A |
6061290 | Shirley | May 2000 | A |
6212118 | Fujita | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6310806 | Higashi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317381 | Gans et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6373738 | Towler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392952 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424582 | Ooishi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434064 | Nagai | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6452868 | Fister | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6480931 | Buti et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515928 | Sato et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6567340 | Nataraj et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6950364 | Kim | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7027343 | Sinha et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7057960 | Fiscus et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7082070 | Hong | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7187607 | Koshikawa et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203113 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203115 | Eto et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209402 | Shinozaki et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215588 | Lee | May 2007 | B2 |
7283380 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7319602 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7444577 | Best et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7551502 | Dono et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565479 | Best et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7830742 | Han | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8174921 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8400805 | Yoko | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8451677 | Okahiro et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8625360 | Iwamoto et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8676725 | Lin et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8681578 | Narui | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8756368 | Best et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8811100 | Ku | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8862973 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8938573 | Greenfield et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9032141 | Bains et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9047978 | Beil et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9058900 | Kang | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9087554 | Park | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9087602 | Youn et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9117544 | Bains | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9123447 | Lee et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9153294 | Kang | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9190137 | Kim et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9190139 | Jung et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9251885 | Greenfield et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9286964 | Halbert et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9299457 | Chun et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9311985 | Lee et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9324398 | Jones et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9384821 | Bains et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9390782 | Best et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9412432 | Narui et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9424907 | Fujishiro | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9484079 | Lee | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9514850 | Kim | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9570143 | Lim et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9646672 | Kim et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9672889 | Lee et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9685240 | Park | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9691466 | Kim | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9697913 | Mariani et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9734887 | Tavva | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9741409 | Jones et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741447 | Akamatsu | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9747971 | Bains et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9761297 | Tomishima | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9786351 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9799391 | Wei | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9805782 | Liou | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9805783 | Ito et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9818469 | Kim et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9847118 | Won | Dec 2017 | B1 |
9865326 | Bains et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9865328 | Desimone et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9922694 | Akamatsu | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9934143 | Bains et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9953696 | Kim | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10032501 | Ito et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10083737 | Bains et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10090038 | Shin | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10134461 | Bell et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10147472 | Jones et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10153031 | Akamatsu | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10170174 | Ito et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10176860 | Mylavarapu | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10210925 | Bains et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10297305 | Moon et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10339994 | Ito et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381327 | Ramachandra et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10387276 | Ryu et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10446216 | Oh et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10490251 | Wolff | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10600462 | Augustine et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10600491 | Chou et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10607686 | Akamatsu | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10629286 | Lee et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10679710 | Hirashima et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10705900 | Jin | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10770127 | Shore et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10811066 | Jones et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10832792 | Penney | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10861519 | Jones et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10867660 | Akamatsu | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10930335 | Bell et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10943636 | Wu et al. | Mar 2021 | B1 |
10950289 | Ito et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10964378 | Ayyapureddi et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11011215 | Parry et al. | May 2021 | B1 |
11043254 | Enomoto et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11139015 | Brown et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11152050 | Morohashi et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11158364 | Penney et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11158373 | Penney et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11200942 | Jenkinson et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11222682 | Enomoto et al. | Jan 2022 | B1 |
11257535 | Shore et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11264096 | Schreck et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11322192 | Morohashi et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11361808 | Bell et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
20010008498 | Ooishi | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020007476 | Kishino | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020078311 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080677 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020181301 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030063512 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067825 | Shimano et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090400 | Barker | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123301 | Jang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030193829 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030231540 | Lazar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004856 | Sakimura et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008544 | Shinozaki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022093 | Lee | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052142 | Ikehashi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040114446 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040130959 | Kawaguchi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174757 | Garverick et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184323 | Mori et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213035 | Cavaleri et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218431 | Chung et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050041502 | Perner | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050105315 | Shin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050243629 | Lee | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265104 | Remaklus et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060083099 | Bae et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087903 | Riho et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060176744 | Stave | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060262616 | Chen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070008799 | Dono et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014174 | Ohsawa | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028068 | Golding et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030746 | Best et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033339 | Best et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070133330 | Ohsawa | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070230264 | Eto | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237016 | Miyamoto et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070297252 | Singh | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080028260 | Oyagi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031068 | Yoo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080062742 | Wang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080126893 | Harrand et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130394 | Dono et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181048 | Han | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080224742 | Pomichter | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253212 | Iida et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266990 | Loeffler | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288720 | Atwal et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301362 | Cavanna et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316845 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090021999 | Tanimura et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090059641 | Jeddeloh | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077571 | Gara et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090161457 | Wakimoto | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168571 | Pyo et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185440 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201752 | Riho et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213675 | Shino | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090251971 | Futatsuyama | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296510 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005217 | Jeddeloh | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100005376 | Laberge et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100054011 | Kim | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074042 | Fukuda et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100080074 | Ohmaru et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110809 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100110810 | Kobayashi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131812 | Mohammad | May 2010 | A1 |
20100157693 | Iwai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100182863 | Fukiage | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100329069 | Ito et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110026290 | Noda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051530 | Kushida | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055495 | Remaklus et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069572 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110122987 | Neyer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110216614 | Hosoe | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225355 | Kajigaya | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110286271 | Chen | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310648 | Iwamoto et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317462 | Gyllenhammer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014199 | Narui | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120059984 | Kang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120151131 | Kilmer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120213021 | Riho et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120254472 | Ware et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130003467 | Klein | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003477 | Park et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130057173 | Yao et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130107623 | Kavalipurapu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130173971 | Zimmerman | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130254475 | Perego et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130279284 | Jeong | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304982 | Jung et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140006703 | Bains et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006704 | Greenfield et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013169 | Kobla et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013185 | Kobla et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140050004 | Mochida | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140078841 | Chopra | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078842 | Oh et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078845 | Song | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089576 | Bains et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095780 | Bains et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140095786 | Moon et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140119091 | You et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136763 | Li et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143473 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140177370 | Halbert et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177376 | Song | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140189215 | Kang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189228 | Greenfield et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219043 | Jones et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140237307 | Kobla et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241099 | Seo et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140254298 | Dally | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140269021 | Yang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281206 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281207 | Mandava et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292375 | Angelini et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140293725 | Best et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317344 | Kim | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140355332 | Youn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369109 | Lee et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379978 | Kim et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150049567 | Chi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055420 | Bell et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150078112 | Huang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089326 | Joo et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150155027 | Abe et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150162067 | Kim et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170728 | Jung et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150199126 | Jayasena et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150206572 | Lim et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213872 | Mazumder et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213877 | Darel | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150228341 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150243339 | Bell et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150255140 | Song | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150262652 | Igarashi | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150279441 | Greenberg et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150279442 | Hwang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294711 | Gaither et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150340077 | Akamatsu | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150356048 | King | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160019940 | Jang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027498 | Ware et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027531 | Jones et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027532 | Kim | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160042782 | Narui et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160078845 | Lin et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160078911 | Fujiwara et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160078918 | Hyun et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086649 | Hong et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086651 | Kim | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160093402 | Kitagawa et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160099043 | Tu | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160111140 | Joo | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160125931 | Doo et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160133314 | Hwang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160140243 | Adams et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160163372 | Lee et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160172056 | Huh | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180917 | Chishti et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180921 | Jeong | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160196863 | Shin et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202926 | Benedict | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160211008 | Benedict et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160225433 | Bains et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160225461 | Tuers et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160336060 | Shin | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160343423 | Shido | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170011792 | Oh et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170076779 | Bains et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092350 | Halbert et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170117030 | Fisch et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170133085 | Kim et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170139641 | Cha et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140807 | Sun et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140811 | Joo | May 2017 | A1 |
20170148504 | Saifuddin et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170177246 | Miller et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170186481 | Oh et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170213586 | Kang et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170221546 | Loh et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170263305 | Cho | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170287547 | Ito et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170323675 | Jones et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170352399 | Yokoyama et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170371742 | Shim et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170372767 | Kang et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180005690 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025770 | Ito et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025772 | Lee et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180060194 | Ryu et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180061483 | Morgan | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082737 | Lee | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180084314 | Koyama | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180090199 | Kim et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180096719 | Tomishima et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180102776 | Chandrasekar et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180107417 | Shechter et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114561 | Fisch et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114565 | Lee | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180158504 | Akamatsu | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182445 | Lee et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180203621 | Ahn et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180218767 | Wolff | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180261268 | Hyun et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180294028 | Lee et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180308539 | Ito et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180341553 | Koudele et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180366182 | Hyun et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190013059 | Akamatsu | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190043558 | Suh et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190051344 | Bell et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066759 | Nale | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066762 | Koya | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190088315 | Saenz et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190088316 | Inuzuka et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190096492 | Cai et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190103147 | Jones et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190130961 | Bell et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190139599 | Ito et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190147941 | Qin et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190147964 | Yun et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190161341 | Howe | May 2019 | A1 |
20190172518 | Chen et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190196730 | Imran | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198078 | Hoang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198090 | Lee | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198099 | Mirichigni et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190205253 | Roberts | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190207736 | Ben-tovim et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228810 | Jones et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228813 | Nale et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228815 | Morohashi et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190237132 | Morohashi | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190243708 | Cha et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190252020 | Rios et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190267077 | Ito et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190279706 | Kim | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190333573 | Shin et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190348100 | Smith et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348103 | Jeong et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348107 | Shin et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190349545 | Koh et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190362774 | Kuramori et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190371391 | Cha et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385661 | Koo et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385667 | Morohashi et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190386557 | Wang et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200005857 | Ito et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200075106 | Tokutomi et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200082873 | Wolff | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200090760 | Purahmad et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200135263 | Brown et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200194050 | Akamatsu | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200194056 | Sakurai et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200201380 | Murali et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200202921 | Morohashi et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200211626 | Hiscock et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200211633 | Okuma | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200211636 | Hiscock et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200251158 | Shore et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200294576 | Brown et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200302994 | Enomoto et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200321049 | Meier et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200349995 | Shore et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200365208 | Schreck et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200381040 | Penney et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200395072 | Penney et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210005229 | Hiscock et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210005240 | Brown et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210020223 | Ayyapureddi et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210026732 | Park et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210057012 | Ayyapureddi et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210057013 | Jenkinson et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210057021 | Wu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210065755 | Kim et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210065764 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210142852 | Schreck et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210158851 | Ayyapureddi et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210158860 | Wu et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210158861 | Jeong et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210201984 | Khasawneh et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210225432 | Enomoto et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210241810 | Hollis et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210265504 | Ishizu et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210343324 | Brown et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210350844 | Morohashi et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210398592 | Penney et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20210407583 | Penney et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220165347 | Pan | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1195173 | Oct 1998 | CN |
101038785 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101067972 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101331554 | Dec 2008 | CN |
101458658 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101622607 | Jan 2010 | CN |
102113058 | Jun 2011 | CN |
102483952 | May 2012 | CN |
104350546 | Feb 2015 | CN |
106710621 | May 2017 | CN |
107871516 | Apr 2018 | CN |
H0773682 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2005-216429 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2011-258259 | Dec 2011 | JP |
4911510 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2013-004158 | Jan 2013 | JP |
20150002783 | Jan 2015 | KR |
20170058022 | May 2017 | KR |
1020180064940 | Jun 2018 | KR |
1020180085184 | Jul 2018 | KR |
20190048049 | May 2019 | KR |
2014120477 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015030991 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2017171927 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2019222960 | Nov 2019 | WO |
2020010010 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020191222 | Sep 2020 | WO |
2021003085 | Jan 2021 | WO |
2022108808 | May 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 11,264,075 B2, 03/2022, Bell et al. (withdrawn) |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/459,507 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Adjusting Victim Data”, filed Jul. 1, 2019, pp. all. |
Application No. PCT/US20/23689, titled “Semiconductor Device Having CAM That Stores Address Signals”, dated Mar. 19, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/884,192 entitled ‘Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation’ filed Jan. 30, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/797,658, titles “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Refresh Operations”, filed Feb. 21, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/818,981, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Targeted Refresh Operations” filed Mar. 13, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/824,460, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, dated Mar. 19, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/025,844, titled “Apparatus and Methods for Triggering Row Hammer Address Sampling”, filed Jul. 2, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,063, titled “Apparatus and Methods for Triggering Row Hammer Address Sampling”, dated Feb. 5, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/805,197, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Calculating Row Hammer Refresh Addresses in a Semiconductor Device”, dated Feb. 28, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/232,837, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Distributed Targeted Refresh Operations”, filed Dec. 26, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/818,989, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, dated Mar. 13, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/268,818, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Managing Row Access Counts”, filed Feb. 6, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/286,187 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Memory Mat Refresh Sequencing” filed Feb. 26, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/084,119, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Pure-Time, Self Adopt Sampling for Row Hammer Refresh Sampling”, filed Sep. 11, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/886,284 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Access Based Refresh Timing” filed May 28, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/886,284, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Access Based Refresh Timing”, dated May 28, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/358,587, titled “Semiconductor Device Having CAM That Stores Address Signals” dated Mar. 19, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/375,716 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Targeted Refresh Operations” filed Apr. 4, 2019; pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/936,297 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Managing Row Access Counts” filed Jul. 22, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/411,573 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for a Content Addressable Memory Cell” filed May 14, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/428,625 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Tracking Victim Rows” filed May 31, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,400 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Tracking Row Accesses” filed Jul. 16, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16,548,027 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Analog Row Access Rate Determination” filed Aug. 22, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/549,942 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Lossy Row Access Counting” filed Aug. 23, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/546,152 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Analog Row Access Tracking” filed Aug. 20, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/549,411 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Dynamic Refresh Allocation” filed Aug. 23, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/655,110 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Dynamic Targeted Refresh Steals” filed Oct. 16, 2019, pp. all. |
International Application No. PCT/US19/40169 titled “Apparatus and Methods for Triggering Row Hammer Address Sampling” filed Jul. 1, 2019, pp. all. |
International Application No. PCT/US19/64028, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, dated Dec. 2, 2019, pp. all. |
International Application No. PCT/US20/26689, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Targeted Refresh Operations”, dated Apr. 3, 2020, pp. all. |
International Application No. PCT/US20/40077, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Monitoring Word Line Accesses”, dated Jun. 29, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/788,657, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, dated Feb. 12, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/881,256 entitled ‘Apparatuses and Methods for Detecting a Row Hammer Attack With a Bandpass Filter’ filed Jan. 26, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,525 titled “Apparatuses And Methods For Tracking All Row Accesses” filed May 29, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/427,140 titled “Apparatuses And Methods For Priority Targeted Refresh Operations” filed May 30, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/427,140 titled “Apparatuses And Methods For Tracking Row Access Counts Between Multiple Register Stacks” filed May 30, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,811 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, And Methods For Determining Extremum Numerical Values” filed Jun. 11, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/537,981 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Targeted Refresh Rates” filed Aug. 12, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/153,555 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Dynamically Allocated Aggressor Detection” filed Jan. 20, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/154,945 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for a Content Addressable Memory Cell” filed Jan. 21, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/168,036 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Analog Row Access Tracking” filed Feb. 4, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/170,616 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Analog Row Access Rate Determination” filed Feb. 8, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/201,941 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Sketch Circuits for Refresh Binning” filed Mar. 15, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/301,533 titled “Semiconductor Device Having CAM That Stores Address Signals” filed Apr. 6, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,897, entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Refreshing Memory”, filed Oct. 20, 2017; pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,340, entitled: “Apparatus and Methods for Refreshing Memory” filed Oct. 27, 2017; pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/012,679, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Multiple Row Hammer Refresh Address Sequences”, filed Jun. 19, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/020,863, titled “Semiconductor Device”, filed Jun. 27, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/112,471 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Refresh Operations” filed Aug. 24, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,801, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Selective Row Refreshes” filed Oct. 15, 2018, pp all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/176,932, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Access Based Refresh Timing”, filed Oct. 31, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/208,217, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Dec. 3, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/230,300, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Targeted Refresh Operations” filed Dec. 21, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,327 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Selective Row Refreshes”, filed Dec. 21, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/237,291, titled “Apparatus and Methods for Refreshing Memory”, filed Dec. 31, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,730, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Mar. 1, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,623, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Apr. 3, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/411,698, titled “Semiconductor Device” filed May 14, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/427,330 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Storing Victim Row Data” filed May 30, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/431,641 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Steal Rates” filed Jun. 4, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/682,606, titled “Apparatuses And Methods For Distributing Row Hammer Refresh Events Across A Memory Device”, filed Nov. 13, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/102,266, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Tracking Word Line Accesses”, dated Nov. 23, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/876,566 entitled ‘Apparatuses and Methods for Calculating Row Hammer Refresh Addresses in a Semiconductor Device’ filed Jan. 22, 2018, pp. all. |
International Application No. PCT/US20/32684, titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for a Content Addressable Memory Cell”, dated May 13, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/656,084, “Apparatuses And Methods For Targeted Refreshing Of Memory”, filed Jul. 21, 2017, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/459,520 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Monitoring Word Line Accesses”, filed Jul. 1, 2019, pp. all. |
PCT Application No. PCT/US18/55821 “Apparatus and Methods for Refreshing Memory” filed Oct. 15, 2018., pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/715,846, entitled “Semiconductor Device”, filed Sep. 26, 2017, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/888,993, entitled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Refresh Operations”, filed Feb. 5, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/190,627 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Targeted Refreshing of Memory” filed Nov. 14, 2018, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/281,818, entitled: “Semiconductor Device” filed Sep. 30, 2016, pp. all. |
Kim, et al., “Flipping Bits in MemoryWithout Accessing Them: An Experimental Study of DRAM Disturbance Errors”, IEEE, Jun. 2014, 12 pgs. |
Stout, Thomas et al., “Voltage Source Based Voltage-to-Time Converter”, IEEE, downloaded Jul. 2020, pp. All. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/456,849 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Main Sketch and Slim Sketch Circuitfor Row Address Tracking” filed Nov. 29, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/565,119 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Row Hammer Counter Mat” filed Dec. 29, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/565,187 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Row Hammer Counter Mat” filed Dec. 29, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/444,925 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Countering Memory Attacks” filed Aug. 12, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/446,710 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Determining Extremum Numericalvalues” filed Sep. 1, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/470,883 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Tracking Victim Rows” filed Sep. 9, 2021. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,069 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Providing Refresh Addresses” filed Aug. 31, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/375,817 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Monitoring Word Line Accesses” filed Jul. 14, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/443,056 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Multiple Row Hammer Refresh Address Sequences” filed Jul. 20, 2021, pp. all. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210020262 A1 | Jan 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16459507 | Jul 2019 | US |
Child | 17060403 | US |