A semiconductor memory device typically stores information via charges accumulated in cell capacitors. One such device that stores information in this manner is a Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM). Charges that accumulate in cell capacitors of a semiconductor memory device may dissipate over time through leakage. This charge leakage may lead to information loss unless refresh operations are periodically carried out. In a semiconductor memory device, such as a DRAM or the like, refresh operations are typically controlled through refresh commands. For example, a control device that controls the DRAM may periodically issue refresh commands that indicate refresh operations. The control device may issue the refresh commands at a frequency such that all word lines are refreshed at least once during the period of one refresh cycle. For example, with a 64 millisecond refresh cycle, a control device may issue a plurality of refresh commands that ensure every word line is refreshed at least once every 64 milliseconds.
The information retention characteristics of a memory cell may be reduced in some cases as a consequence of the access history of the memory cell. If the information retention time of the memory cell is reduced to less than one refresh cycle, part of the information stored in the memory cell may be lost even when refresh commands are issued at a frequency that refreshes all word lines at least one time per refresh cycle. Various factors may give rise to this problem in DRAMs. For example, cell leakage may occur due to crystal defects, foreign matters, etc., which may be present in memory cells by some degree. Cell leakage may also emerge due to interference from adjacent word lines or noise caused along with memory access. In some cases, the impact of access history on information retention may be mitigated by providing a disturb counter, which counts and/or stores the number of accesses that occur for each memory section. If an access count becomes larger than a predetermined threshold value, the refresh frequency of the section may be increased.
With miniaturization of DRAMs advancing to become a 2x-nm process in the current generation, the “row hammer” phenomenon has emerged. Generally, the “row hammer” phenomenon occurs when adjacent cell charges are lost by minor carriers that are generated every time a word line is activated/deactivated. Errors may occur as a result. The row hammer phenomenon is an additional mechanism for information retention loss and thus presents additional difficulties for the reliability of DRAMs. A row hammer threshold value generally refers to the number of memory access for a given word line that result in errors occurring in adjacent word lines. As process dimensions shrink, row hammer threshold values become smaller. In the 20-nm process generation, row hammer threshold values become 100,000 times or less. Because of this increasing problem, it is becoming difficult to maintain correct operations without dedicated circuit solutions in DRAM or some other solution on the memory side.
Some solutions to the row hammer problem expand the above-mentioned disturb counter to monitor each row address so to determine a row address (hammer address) at which the number accesses has reached the row hammer threshold value. Once the disturb counter registers a threshold number of accesses, adjacent word line(s) are subjected to additional refresh operations. However, because the memory space of a memory system is much bigger than a single DRAM, an extremely large scale circuit has to be mounted in order to analyze the history of access to such memory cells, and the cost thereof is not realistic. This is even more so in a large-scale system such as a server.
Other solutions focus on the fact that the appearance frequency of hammer addresses, as determined the row hammer threshold, inevitably increases as the upper limit of the number of times of row access (the number of Active commands) which can be executed in a refresh cycle decreases. Here, row addresses may be captured at random timing and at an appropriate frequency according to a probabilistic memory control. When random capture of row addresses is used, only additional refresh with respect to the adjacent word line thereof is carried out. Therefore, the circuit scale can be extremely reduced, and, according to the probability of hitting the hammer addresses, practically high reliability can be obtained.
The present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for scheduling row hammer events across multiple memories in a memory device. As used herein, a “memory” may operate as part of a larger “memory device” that includes a number of other memories. For example, a memory may be a unit of memory such as a Dynamic Random Access Memory or the like. A memory may include a plurality of memory cells that are organized into word lines that may accessed as a group from outside the memory. A memory device may be Dual In-Line Memory Module or the like which includes a plurality of memories. A memory device may include a controller that issues commands to the various memories. For example, a controller may issue a read command that retrieves data from a word line in a particular memory. A controller may also issue a write command that stores data at a word line in a particular memory. Because memory cells store data via electrical charges that deteriorate over time, a controller may also periodically issue refresh commands that operate to restore electrical charges on individual memory cells in a word line of memory.
Generally, a “row hammer event” occurs when a refresh command is executed to refresh word lines that are adjacent to a hammered word line. A particular word line is “hammered” when it is accessed via memory access operations, such as a read or a write, in a manner that could potentially lead to data errors in adjacent word lines. Typically, a word line is hammered when it accessed more than a predetermined number of times. Embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure may determine that a particular word line is hammered via various mechanisms. In one example, probabilistic methods may be used to track hammer addresses. In other examples, disturb counters or similar mechanisms may be used to track hammer addresses.
A row hammer refresh command may be generally executed via a refresh command steal operation where a refresh command received from a memory device controller is “stolen” by the memory and a row hammer refresh command is executed in place of the “stolen” refresh command. The refresh command called, for by the “stolen” refresh command is typically executed at a later time after the row hammer refresh command is executed. In connection with the refresh steal operation, a memory may execute a timing protocol that allows the memory to “steal” refresh commands with a frequency that is determined such that a sufficient number of refresh commands are still executed to ensure that data in the memory is not lost.
A row hammer refresh command generally refreshes fewer memory cells than a typical memory refresh command. Because a row hammer refresh command refreshes fewer memory cells, a row hammer refresh command consumes less power than a typical memory refresh command. Given this observation, a memory device in accordance with the present disclosure may be programmed such that not all memories associated with a memory device execute a row hammer refresh command at the same time. Through this programming, the power consumption saving that occur on a row hammer refresh command may be distributed across the memories of a memory device. In this way, the peak power consumption of a memory device may be reduced.
The memory 10 may be generally configured to be receive inputs from an external controller. Certain aspects of an example controller are described in greater detail below. The memory include various external terminals that provide for communication with the external controller. For example, the memory 10 may be provided with address terminals 21, command terminals 22, clock terminals 23, data terminals 24, and data mask terminals 25 as externals. The memory 10 may include additional external terminals such as power supply terminals 26 and 27. The address terminals 21 are the terminals to which address signals ADD are input from outside. The address signals ADD are supplied to an address output circuit 32 via an address input circuit 31. The address output circuit 32 supplies a row address XADD to the row decoder 12A and supplies a column address YADD to the column decoder 13. Moreover, the row address XADD is supplied also to a refresh address control circuit 40.
The command terminals 22 are the terminals to which command signals COM are input from outside. The command signals COM are supplied to a command decoder 34 via a command input circuit 33. The command decoder 34 is a circuit which generates various internal commands by decoding the command signals COM. Examples of the internal commands include active signets ACT, pre-charge signals Pre, read/write signals R/W, and refresh signals AREF.
The active signal ACT is a pulse signal which is activated when the command signal COM is indicating row access (active command). When the active signal ACT is activated, the row decoder 12 of a specified bank address is activated. As a result, the word line WL specified by the row address XADD is selected and activated. The pre-charge signal Pre is a pulse signal which is activated when the command signal COM is indicating pre-charge. When the pre-charge signal Pre is activated, the row decoder 12A of the specified bank address and the word line WL specified by the row address XADD controlled thereby are deactivated.
The read/write signal RAN is a pulse signal which is activated when the command signal COM is indicating column access (read command or write command). When the read/write signal RAN is activated, the column decoder 13 is activated. As a result, the bit line BL specified by the column address YADD is selected. Therefore, if the active command and the read command are input and if the row address XADD and the column address YADD are input in synchronization with them, read data is read from the memory cell MC specified by the row address XADD and the column address YADD. The read data DQ is output from the data terminal 24 to outside via a sense amplifier SAMP, a transfer gate TG, the read/write amplifier 14, and an input/output circuit 15.
On the other hand, if the active command and the write, command are input, if the row address XADD and the column address YADD are input in synchronization with them, and, then, if write data DQ is input to the data terminal 24, the write data DQ is supplied to the memory cell array 11 via the input/output circuit 15, the read/write amplifier 14, the transfer gate TG, and the sense amplifier SAMP and is written to the memory cell MC specified by the row address XADD and the column address YADD.
The refresh signal AREF is a pulse signal which is activated when the command signal COM is indicating an auto-refresh command. Also, when the command signal COM is indicating a self-refresh entry command, the refresh signal AREF is activated, is activated once immediately after command input, thereafter, is cyclically activated at desired internal timing, and a refresh state is continued. By a self-refresh exit command thereafter, the activation of the refresh signal AREF is stopped and returns to an IDLE state. The refresh signal AREF is supplied to the refresh address control circuit 40. The refresh address control circuit 40 supplies a refreshing row address RXADD to the row decoder 12A, thereby activating the predetermined word line WL contained in the memory cell array 11, thereby refreshing the information of the corresponding memory cell MC. Other than the refresh signal AREF, the active signal ACT, the row address XADD, etc. are supplied to the refresh address control circuit 40. Details of the refresh address control circuit 40 will be described later.
External clock signals CK and /CK are input to the clock terminals 23. The external clock signals CK and the external clock signals /CK are mutually complementary signals, and both of them are supplied to the clock input circuit 35. The clock input circuit 35 generates internal clock signals ICLK based on the external clock signals CK and /CK. The internal clock signals ICLK are supplied to the command decoder 34, an internal clock generator 36, etc. The internal clock generator 36 generates internal clock signals LCLK, which control the operation timing of the input/output circuit 15.
The data mask terminals 25 are the terminals to which data mask signals DM are input. When the data mask signal DM is activated, overwrite of corresponding data is prohibited.
The power supply terminals 26 are the terminals to which power supply potentials VDD and VSS are supplied. The power supply potentials VDD and VSS supplied to the power supply terminals 26 are supplied to a voltage generator 37. The voltage generator 37 generates various internal potentials VPP, VOD, VARY, VPERI, etc. based on the power supply potentials VDD and VSS. The internal potential VPP is the potential mainly used in the row decoder 12A, the internal potentials VOD and VARY are the potentials used in the sense amplifier SAMP in the memory cell array 11, and the internal potential VPERI is the potential used in many other circuit blocks.
The power supply terminals 27 are the terminals to which power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ are supplied. The power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ supplied to the power supply terminals 27 are supplied to the input/output circuit 15. The power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ are the same potentials as the power supply potentials VDD and VSS, respectively, which are supplied to the power supply terminals 26. However, the dedicated power supply potentials VDDQ and VSSQ are used for the input/output circuit 15 so that power supply noise generated by the input/output circuit 15 does not propagate to other circuit blocks.
A memory 10 in accordance with the present disclosure typically receives a sequential series of refresh commands that, when processed by the refresh address control circuit 40 and other components of the memory 10, operate to refresh the memory cell array 11 block by block. For example, a first refresh command may be received that is directed to refreshing word lines WL in a first address block, a second refresh command may be received that is directed to refreshing word lines WL in a second address block, and so on. As used herein, an “address block” refers to a sequential group of memory locations that may be accessed by addressing a particular memory location in the address block such as the first memory location. The series of refresh commands continues in this way until all word lines WL have been refreshed. Once all word lines WL have been refreshed, a new sequential series of refresh commands is initiated, beginning again with the first refresh command.
The externally generated refresh commands do not generally occur one after the other, but rather are interleaved with other commands issued to the memory 10. Here, commands may be issued to a memory 10 in a sequence with slots in the sequence being allocated for a refresh command. The refresh command slots may occur with a frequency that allows one sequential series of refresh commands to be completed within a predetermined refresh cycle time. The refresh cycle time may be determined based on the frequency with which a cell must be refreshed in order to preserve data.
The refresh cycle time may be defined in a way that allows for row hammer refresh events to occur in the memory 10. In row hammer refresh events, certain refresh command slots may be used for a row hammer refresh command instead of for a sequential refresh command. In this way, refresh command slots may be “stolen” periodically for row hammer refresh operations. The rate with which refresh command slots are stolen may vary depending on the implementation. For example, a refresh command slot may be stolen once every 17th refresh command slot, once every 9th refresh command slot, once every 5th refresh command slot, and so on.
The refresh address control circuit 40 is generally configured to provide the refreshing row address RXADD that specifies a particular word line to be refreshed. In one respect, the refresh address control circuit 40 provides the refreshing row address RXADD responsive to sequential refresh commands received from an external controller outside of the memory 10. The refresh address control circuit 40 may additionally be configured to “steal” or otherwise preempt a refresh command received from the external controller and replace that refresh command with a row hammer refresh command. Here, the refresh address control circuit 40 provides the refreshing row address RXADD responsive to a row hammer refresh event. As shown in
The refresh address counter 200 may additionally include a row hammer refresh (RHR) counter 208 that is generally configured to “steal” a refresh command received from the external controller and replace that refresh command with a row hammer refresh command. The RHR counter 208 may reference the current state of the CBR circuit 204 in determining the timing for stealing the refresh command. Thus, the RHR counter 208 may receive as input the CBR signal, which is output from the CBR circuit 204. The RHR_Token signal may be provided as input to RHR counter 208 so as to enable its command stealing functionality. As mentioned, the refresh address control circuit 200 may be enabled to steal a refresh command when the refresh address control circuit 200 is in possession of a refresh token provided by an external controller. More specifically, the refresh address control circuit 200 may be enabled to steal a refresh command when the RHR_Token signal received by the refresh address control circuit 200 is asserted by the external controller. When the RHR counter 208 determines based on its inputs that a row hammer refresh event should occur, the RHR counter 208 asserts the RHR_ModeF signal. The RHR_ModeF signal is then provided as output from the RHR counter 208.
The refresh address counter 200 may additionally include a refresh address output circuit 212. The refresh address output circuit 212 may be configured to receive the CBR signal and the RHR_ModeF signal as input. When not in row hammer refresh mode, the address output circuit 212 passes through the memory address provided by the CBR signal. When in row hammer refresh mode, the address output circuit 212 provides a row hammer address according to its own internal calculations. Embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure may determine that a particular word line is hammered via various mechanisms. In one example, probabilistic methods may be used to track hammer addresses. In other examples, disturb counters or similar mechanisms may be used to track hammer addresses. More generally, any currently existing or later developed methods for determined a hammered word line may be used.
The first flip flop 304a is coupled to the second flip flop 304b such that the Q output of the first flip flop 304a is coupled to the CLKf input of the second flip flop 304b. The Q output of the first flip flop 304a is also coupled to the CLK input of the second flip flop 304b through the first inventor 308a. The first inverter 308a also provides a feedback path such that the Q output of the first flip flop 304a is coupled through the first inverter 308 to the input of the first flip flop 304a. Additional adjacent flip flops that are further downstream in the flip flop chain 302 are coupled together in a manner similar to the coupling between the first flip flop 304a and the second flip flop 304b. For example, the Q output of the second flip flop 304b is coupled directly to CLKf input of the third flip flop 304c and through the second inverter 308b to the CLK input of the third flip flop 304c and the D input of the second flip flop 304b, and so on.
The flip flop chain 302 additionally includes R and S lines that connect to the R and S inputs of the various flip flops 304a-f in the flip flop chain 302. The R and S lines may be asserted to set and/or reset the flip flops on start up or otherwise as appropriate.
The CBR circuit 300 may be generally configured to count through a series of internal memory addresses responsive to a refresh command received from the external controller. The Q output of each of the flip flops 304a-f provides one bit of an internal memory address. The CBR signal provided by the CBR circuit 300 may represent the internal memory addresses. The first bit signal 320 that provides input to the NAND gate 312 may toggle between a logical one state and a logical zero state. This toggling between one and zero may lead to a subsequent toggle of the flip flops 304a-f in the flip flop chain 302 through the configuration described above such that a counter function is implemented. For example, when the initial bit line 320 toggles from one to zero, the first flop 304a toggles from zero to one. When the first flip flop 304a toggles from one to zero, the second flip flop 304b toggles from zero to one. Through these transitions, the flip flop chain 302 counts through a series of binary values as follows: “000000”, “100000”, “010000”, “110000” “111111”. As previously discussed, the binary values may represent memory addresses.
The CBR circuit 300 may supply internal memory addresses for refresh commands. In one embodiment, the CBR circuit 300 is configured such that the first and second bits of the flip flop chain 302 correspond to the A<13:12> signals of the internal address bus. Through the operation of the CBR circuit 300, the A<13:12> signals cycle through four different states 00, 10, 01, and 11 within a single command. In this way, a single refresh command is sub divided into 4 internal events with different most significant bit (MSB) addresses. During a row hammer refresh event, the RHR_ModeF signal 324 may be asserted, for example, by the RHR counter 204 shown in
The programmable selector signal tmfrRHR selects a particular rate at which refresh commands are stolen for a row hammer refresh operation. For example, the programmable selector signal tmfzRHR signal selecting the second most LSB of the CBR signal results in a row hammer refresh operation occurring after 4 sequential refreshes, the programmable selector signal tmfzRHR signal selecting the third most LSB of the CBR signal results in a row hammer refresh operation occurring after 8 sequential refreshes, and so on. In this way, the multiplexer 404 provides a 1:N steal rate counting, where N=5, 9, 17, and so on.
The RHR counter may further include a timeout circuit 408. The timeout circuit 408 may receive a CBRCNT signal as input. The CBRCNT signal may be provided from the refresh address output circuit 212 or other components. The CBRCNT signal may be used to specify a row hammer refresh cycle time. The timeout circuit 408 may additionally receive as input the RHR_ModeF signal, which signal is fed back from the output of the RHR counter 208. The timeout circuit 408 is generally configured to provide an output signal HammerCountStopF that triggers a row hammer refresh timeout. The timeout circuit 408 begins a count cycle when the RHR_ModeF signal is asserted indicating the beginning of row hammer refresh operation. The timeout circuit 408 then counts down from the value indicated by the CBRCNT signal. When the timeout circuit 408 counts down to zero, the timeout circuit 408 asserts that HammerCountStopF signal so to indicate an end of the row hammer refresh operation.
The latch 412 is generally configured to provide a handoff between sequential refresh operations and row hammer refresh operations. The latch 412 includes a first NAND gate 416 that is coupled to the multiplexer 404 and a second NAND gate 420 that is coupled to the timeout circuit 408. The latch 412 provides an output, which is labelled in
The RHR counter 400 may additionally include a flip flop 424 coupled to the output of the latch 412. The flip flop 424 may be configured to latch and hold the value of the HammerCountEn on a refresh command basis. The flip flop 424 may be a D type flip flop in one embodiment. The flip flop 424 may be clocked by an AREF signal that indicates a refresh command. The output of the flip flop 424 is provided to the output of the RHR counter 404 through an XOR gate 428. The XOR gate 428 is configured to also receive the RHR_Token signal as an input. When the RHR_Token signal is asserted, the XOR gate passes the HammerCountEn signal to the output of the RHR counter 400.
The number of rows refreshed in a row hammer refresh operation may be specified by the CBRCNT signal shown in
The memory device may be organized into groups of memories such that only one group at a time executes a row hammer refresh operation. For example, each group of memories may be assigned a different delay. Once a particular memory reaches the time for a row hammer refresh operation, the memory may wait its assigned delay amount before stealing a refresh command slot for a row hammer refresh operation. Thus, the various memories may steal refresh command slots at the same rate, but execute the operation at different time due to the various delays.
As shown in
Each shift register cell 604(0)_604(n) of the N-bit shift register 600 may include a CLK input. The N-bit shift register 600 may be configured to advance the RHR refresh token from one shift register cell to another on a particular edge of a clock signal. A shift register cell may be clocked with the AREF signal shown in
Through a token provided over a token bus 540, the controller 500 may be configured to enable one memory group 548a-i at a time to steal a refresh command for a row hammer refresh operation. In order to simply the diagram 800, one RHR_ModeF signal per memory groups 548a-i is shown in
In operation, the controller 538 issues a series of refresh commands to the various memories 504a-536d. In
The additional step of holding off from executing the row hammer refresh event until the token is received may be used to cause the various memories 504a-536d to execute row hammer refresh operations at different times. The aspect of the present disclosure is illustrated in
As the token is passed between the memories 504a-536d, each memory enabled to steal a refresh command for a row hammer refresh operation. Thus, as shown in
By distributing row hammer refresh events across the memory device 500 as shown in
Embodiments of the present disclosure allow each memory associated with a memory device to program which refresh in a given refresh cycle fires a row hammer refresh event. As described above, various refresh cycles times may be defined such as every 5th refresh command, every 9th refresh command, every 17th refresh command. By programming a memory device such that row hammer refresh events are distributed across the memory device, the peak idd5 current at a memory device level can be reduced by almost 1/(steal rate). For example, refreshing 16 row hammer refresh rows instead of 256 rows may result in a 75% IDD reduction. On a DIMM, including up to 36 DRAM devices, embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure can reduce peak idd5 demand by evenly distributing the steals across different commands. For example, steal 1:9 and 36 chips could have 4 chips stealing every refresh command instead of 36 chips stealing every 9th refresh command. Accordingly, in some embodiments, peak, power reduction of approximately 8.6% may be obtained.
The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the structure and use of exemplary embodiments of the invention as defined in the claims. Although various embodiments of the claimed invention have been described above with a certain degree of particularity, or with reference to one or more individual embodiments, those skilled in the art could make numerous alterations to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the claimed invention. Other embodiments are therefore contemplated. It is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative only of particular embodiments and not limiting. Changes in detail or structure may be made without departing from the basic elements of the invention as defined in the following claims.
The foregoing description has broad application. The discussion of any embodiment is meant only to be explanatory and is not intended to suggest that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to these examples. In other words, while illustrative embodiments of the disclosure have been described in detail herein, the inventive concepts may be otherwise variously embodied and employed, and the appended claims are intended to be construed to include such variations, except as limited by the prior art.
This application is a divisional of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/419,590 filed Jan. 30, 2017. The aforementioned application is incorporated herein by reference, in its entirety, for any purpose.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5299159 | Balistreri et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5654929 | Mote, Jr. | Aug 1997 | A |
5699297 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5867442 | Kim et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5933377 | Hidaka | Aug 1999 | A |
5943283 | Wong et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956288 | Bermingham et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959923 | Matteson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970507 | Kato et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999471 | Choi | Dec 1999 | A |
6002629 | Kim et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011734 | Pappert | Jan 2000 | A |
6061290 | Shirley | May 2000 | A |
6064621 | Tanizaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
6212118 | Fujita | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6306721 | Teo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310806 | Higashi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310814 | Hampel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6363024 | Fibranz | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6392952 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424582 | Ooishi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434064 | Nagai | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6452868 | Fister | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6515928 | Sato et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535950 | Funyu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567340 | Nataraj et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6950364 | Kim | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7002868 | Takahashi | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7057960 | Fiscus et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7082070 | Hong | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7187607 | Koshikawa et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203113 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203115 | Eto et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209402 | Shinozaki et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215588 | Lee | May 2007 | B2 |
7444577 | Best et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7551502 | Dono et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7692993 | Iida et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7830742 | Han | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8174921 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8400805 | Yoko | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8572423 | Isachar et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8625360 | Iwamoto et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8681578 | Narui | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8811100 | Ku | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8862973 | Zimmerman et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8938573 | Greenfield et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9032141 | Bains et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9047978 | Bell et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9076499 | Schoenborn et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9087602 | Youn et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9117544 | Bains et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9123447 | Lee et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9153294 | Kang | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9190139 | Jung et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9236110 | Bains et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9251885 | Greenfield et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9286964 | Halbert et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9299400 | Bains et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9311984 | Hong et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9311985 | Lee et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9324398 | Jones et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9384821 | Bains et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9396786 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9406358 | Lee | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9412432 | Narui et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9418723 | Chishti et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9424907 | Fujishiro | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9484079 | Lee | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9514850 | Kim | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9570143 | Lim et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9570201 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9646672 | Kim et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9653139 | Park | May 2017 | B1 |
9672889 | Lee et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9685240 | Park | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9691466 | Kim | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9697913 | Mariani et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9734887 | Tavva | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9741409 | Jones et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741447 | Akamatsu | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9747971 | Bains et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9761297 | Tomishima | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9786351 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9799391 | Wei | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9805782 | Liou | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9805783 | Ito et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9812185 | Fisch et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9818469 | Kim | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9831003 | Sohn et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9865326 | Bains et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9865328 | Desimone et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9922694 | Akamatsu | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9934143 | Bains et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9953696 | Kim | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9978430 | Seo et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10020045 | Riho | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10020046 | Uemura | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10032501 | Ito et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10049716 | Proebsting | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10083737 | Bains et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10090038 | Shin | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10134461 | Bell et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10141042 | Richter | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10147472 | Jones et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10153031 | Akamatsu | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10170174 | Ito et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10192608 | Morgan | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10210925 | Bains et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10297305 | Moon et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10297307 | Raad et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10339994 | Ito et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10381327 | Ramachandra et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10446256 | Ong et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10468076 | He et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10490250 | Ito et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10504577 | Alzheimer | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10510396 | Notani et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10572377 | Zhang | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10573370 | Ito et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10607679 | Nakaoka | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10685696 | Brown et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10699796 | Benedict | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10790005 | He et al. | Sep 2020 | B1 |
10825505 | Rehmeyer | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10832792 | Penney et al. | Nov 2020 | B1 |
10930335 | Bell et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10943636 | Wu et al. | Mar 2021 | B1 |
10950289 | Ito et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10957377 | Noguchi | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10964378 | Ayyapureddi et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10978132 | Rehmeyer et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11017833 | Wu et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11069393 | Cowles et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11081160 | Ito | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20010008498 | Ooishi | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020026613 | Niiro | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020181301 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191467 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030026161 | Yamaguchi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063512 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067825 | Shimano et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081483 | De Paor et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123301 | Jang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030161208 | Nakashima et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030193829 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030231540 | Lazar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004856 | Sakimura et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008544 | Shinozaki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022093 | Lee | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024955 | Patel | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040114446 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040130959 | Kawaguchi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040184323 | Mori et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040218431 | Chung et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050002268 | Otsuka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050041502 | Perner | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050105362 | Choi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108460 | David | May 2005 | A1 |
20050213408 | Shieh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243627 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265104 | Remaklus et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060018174 | Park et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060083099 | Bae et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060087903 | Riho et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104139 | Hur et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060176744 | Stave | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215474 | Hokenmaier | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233012 | Sekiguchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060262616 | Chen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262617 | Lee | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268643 | Schreck et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070002651 | Lee | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070008799 | Dona et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014175 | Min et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028068 | Golding et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030746 | Best et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070147154 | Lee | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070237016 | Miyamoto et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263442 | Cornwell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297252 | Singh | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080028260 | Oyagi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031068 | Yoo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080126893 | Harrand et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130394 | Dono et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181048 | Han | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080212386 | Riho | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224742 | Pomichter | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253212 | Iida et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253213 | Sato et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266990 | Loeffler | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270683 | Barth et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080306723 | De Ambroggi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316845 | Wang et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090021999 | Tanimura et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090052264 | Hong et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059641 | Jeddeloh | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090073760 | Betser et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090161468 | Fujioka | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168571 | Pyo et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185440 | Lee | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201752 | Riho et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228739 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090251971 | Futatsuyama | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296510 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005376 | Laberge et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100061153 | Yen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074042 | Fukuda et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100097870 | Kim et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110809 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100110810 | Kobayashi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124138 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128547 | Kagami | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131812 | Mohammad | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141309 | Lee | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157693 | Iwai et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100182862 | Teramoto | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182863 | Fukiage | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100329069 | Ito et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110026290 | Noda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055495 | Remaklus, Jr. et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069572 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110122987 | Neyer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110134715 | Norman | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110216614 | Hosoe | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225355 | Kajigaya | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110299352 | Fujishiro et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310648 | Iwamoto et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014199 | Narui | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120059984 | Kang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120151131 | Kilmer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155173 | Lee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155206 | Kodama et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120213021 | Riho et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120254472 | Ware et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287727 | Wang | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307582 | Marumoto et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327734 | Sato | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003467 | Klein | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003477 | Park et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130028034 | Fujisawa | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051157 | Park | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051171 | Porter et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130077423 | Lee | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130279284 | Jeong | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140006700 | Schaefer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006703 | Bains et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006704 | Greenfield et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013169 | Kobla et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013185 | Kobla et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140016422 | Kim et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140022858 | Chen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140043888 | Chen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140050004 | Mochida | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140078841 | Chopra | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078842 | Oh et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089576 | Bains et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089758 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095780 | Bains et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140095786 | Moon et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140119091 | You et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143473 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140169114 | Oh | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177370 | Halbert et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181453 | Jayasena et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140185403 | Lai | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189228 | Greenfield et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219042 | Yu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140219043 | Jones et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140237307 | Kobla et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140241099 | Seo et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140254298 | Dally | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281206 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281207 | Mandava et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140321226 | Pyeon | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150016203 | Sriramagiri et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150049566 | Lee et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049567 | Chi | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055420 | Bell et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150078112 | Huang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150085564 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089326 | Joo et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092508 | Bains | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150109871 | Bains et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150120999 | Kim et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150134897 | Sriramagiri et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150162064 | Oh et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170728 | Jung et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150206572 | Lim et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213872 | Mazumder et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150243339 | Bell et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150255140 | Song | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150279442 | Hwang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150294711 | Gaither et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150340077 | Akamatsu | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150356048 | King | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380073 | Joo et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160019940 | Jang et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027498 | Ware et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027531 | Jones et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027532 | Kim | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160042782 | Narui et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160070483 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160078846 | Liu et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160078911 | Fujiwara et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160086649 | Hong et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160093402 | Kitagawa et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160125931 | Doo et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160133314 | Hwang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160155491 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180917 | Chishti et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180921 | Jeong | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160196863 | Shin et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160202926 | Benedict | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160225433 | Bains et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160343423 | Shido | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170011792 | Oh | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170052722 | Ware | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170076779 | Bains et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092350 | Halbert et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170133085 | Kim et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170133108 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140807 | Sun et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140810 | Choi et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170140811 | Joo | May 2017 | A1 |
20170146598 | Kim et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170148504 | Saifuddin et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170186481 | Oh et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170213586 | Kang et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170263305 | Cho | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170269861 | Lu et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170287547 | Ito et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170323675 | Jones et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170345482 | Balakrishnan | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170352404 | Lee et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180005690 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025772 | Lee et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180025773 | Bains et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033479 | Lea et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180047110 | Blackman et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180061476 | Kim | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180061485 | Joo | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180075927 | Jeong | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180096719 | Tomishima et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180108401 | Choi et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114561 | Fisch et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114565 | Lee | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180122454 | Lee et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180130506 | Kang et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180137005 | Wu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180158504 | Akamatsu | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180158507 | Bang | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182445 | Lee et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190340 | Kim et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180218767 | Wolff | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226119 | Kim et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180233197 | Laurent | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180240511 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180247876 | Kim et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180254078 | We et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180261268 | Hyun et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180276150 | Eckert et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180285007 | Franklin et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180294028 | Lee et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180308539 | Ito et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190013059 | Akamatsu | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190043558 | Suh et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190051344 | Bell et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190065087 | Li et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066759 | Nale | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066766 | Lee | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190088315 | Saenz et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190088316 | Inuzuka et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190103147 | Jones et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190115069 | Lai | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190122723 | Ito et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190129651 | Wuu et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190130960 | Kim | May 2019 | A1 |
20190130961 | Bell et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190147964 | Yun et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190161341 | Howe | May 2019 | A1 |
20190190341 | Beisele et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190196730 | Imran | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198078 | Hoang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198099 | Mirichigni et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190205253 | Roberts | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228810 | Jones et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190228815 | Morohashi et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190252020 | Rios et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190267077 | Ito et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190279706 | Kim | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190294348 | Ware et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190333573 | Shin et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190348100 | Smith et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190348103 | Jeong et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190362774 | Kuramori et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190385661 | Koo et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385667 | Morohashi et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385668 | Fujioka et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385670 | Notani et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190386557 | Wang et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190391760 | Miura et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190392886 | Cox et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200051616 | Cho | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200075086 | Hou et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200126611 | Riho et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200135263 | Brown et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200143871 | Kim et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200176050 | Ito et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200185026 | Yun et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200194056 | Sakurai et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200202921 | Morohashi et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200210278 | Rooney et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200211632 | Noguchi | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200211633 | Okuma | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200211634 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200219555 | Rehmeyer | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200219556 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200265888 | Ito et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200273517 | Yamamoto | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200273518 | Raad et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200279599 | Ware et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294569 | Wu et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294576 | Brown et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200321049 | Meier et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200381040 | Penney et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200388324 | Rehmeyer et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200388325 | Cowles et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200395063 | Rehmeyer | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210057021 | Wu et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210057022 | Jenkinson et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210118491 | Li et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210166752 | Noguchi | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210183433 | Jenkinson et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210183435 | Meier et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210225431 | Rehmeyer et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210304813 | Cowles et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210335411 | Wu et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101038785 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101067972 | Nov 2007 | CN |
104350546 | Feb 2015 | CN |
106710621 | May 2017 | CN |
107871516 | Apr 2018 | CN |
2005-216429 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2611-258259 | Dec 2011 | JP |
4911510 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2013-004158 | Jan 2013 | JP |
6281030 | Jan 2018 | JP |
2014120477 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015030991 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2017171927 | Oct 2017 | WO |
2020117686 | Jun 2020 | WO |
2020247163 | Dec 2020 | WO |
2020247639 | Dec 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 16/788,657, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Feb. 12, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/818,989, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Mar. 13, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/818,981 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Targeted Refresh Operations” filed Mar. 13, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No, 16/208,217, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Dec. 3. 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/824,460, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Mar. 19, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/997,766 titled “Refresh Logic Circuit Layouts Thereof” filed Aug. 19, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/783,063, titled “Apparatus and Methods for Triggering Row Hammer Address Sampling”, filed Feb. 5, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/095,978 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Refresh Timing” filed Nov. 12, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/431,641 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Steal Rates” filed Jun. 4, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/030,018, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Refresh Operations”, filed Sep. 23, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/655,110 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Dynamic Targeted Refresh Steals” filed Oct. 16, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/025,844, titled “Apparatus and Methods for Triggering Row Hammer Address Sampling”, filed Jul. 2, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/084,119, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Pure-Time, Self Adopt Sampling for Row Hammer Refresh Sampling”, filed Sep. 11, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/176,932, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Access Based Refresh Timing”, filed Oct. 31, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/230,300, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Targeted Refresh Operations” filed Dec. 21, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/232,837, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Distributed Targeted Refresh Operations”, filed Dec. 26, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/286,187 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Memory MAT Refresh Sequencing” filed Feb. 26, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,730, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Mar. 1, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/374,623, titled “Semiconductor Device Performing Row Hammer Refresh Operation”, filed Apr. 3, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/375,716 titled “Stagger RHR Pumping Scheme Across Die Banks” filed Apr. 4, 2019; pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/549,411 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Dynamic Refresh Allocation” filed Aug. 23, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/008,396 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Targeted Refresh Operations” filed Aug. 31, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/886,284, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Access Based Refresh Timing”, filed May 28, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/175,485 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Distributed Targeted Refresh Operations” filed Feb. 12, 2021. |
Application No. PCT/US20/23689, titled “Semiconductor Device Having CAM That Stores Address Signals”, filed Mar. 19, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/797,658, titles “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Refresh Operations”, filed Feb. 21, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/805,197, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Calculating Row Hammer Refresh Addresses in a Semiconductor Device”, filed Feb. 28, 2020. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/268,818, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Managing Row Access Counts”, filed Feb. 6, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. No. 16/358,587, titled “Semiconductor Device Having CAM That Stores Address Signals”, filed Mar. 19, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/411,573 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for a Content Addressable Memory Cell” filed May 14, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/428,625 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Tracking Victim Rows” filed May 31, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/513,400 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Tracking Row Accesses” filed Jul. 16, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/548,027 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Analog Row Access Rate Determination” filed Aug. 22, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/549,942 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Lossy Row Access Counting” filed Aug. 23, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/546,152 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Analog Row Access Tracking” filed Aug. 20, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/881,256 entitled ‘Apparatuses and Methods for Detecting a Row Hammer Attack With a Bandpass Filter’ filed Jan. 26, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/425,525 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Tracking All Row Accesses” filed May 29, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/427,105 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Priority Targeted Refresh Operations” filed May 30, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/427,140 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Tracking Row Access Counts Between Multiple Register Stacks” filed May 30, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/437,811 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Determining Extremum Numerical Values”' filed Jun. 11, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/789,897, entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Refreshing Memory”, filed Oct. 20, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,340, entitled: “'Apparatus and Methods for Refreshing Memory” filed Oct. 27, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/012,679, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Multiple Row Hammer Refresh Address Sequences”, filed Jun. 19, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/020,863, titled “Semiconductor Device”, filed Jun. 27, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/112,471 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Refresh Operations” filed Aug. 24, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,801, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Selective Row Refreshes” filed Oct. 15, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,327 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Selective Row Refreshes”, filed Dec. 21, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/237,291, titled “Apparatus and Methods for Refreshing Memory”, filed Dec. 31, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/411,698 title “Semiconductor Device” filed May 14, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/427,330 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Storing Victim Row Data” filed May 30, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/876,566 entitled ‘Apparatuses and Methods for Calculating Row Hammer Refresh Addresses in a Semiconductor Device’ filed Jan. 22, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/656,084, titled: Apparatuses and Methods for Targeted Refreshing of Memory, filed Jul. 21, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/459,520 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Monitoring Word Line Accesses”, filed Jul. 1, 2019. |
PCT Application No. PCT/US18/55821 “Apparatus and Methods for Refreshing Memory” filed Oct. 15, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/715,846, entitled “Semiconductor Device”, filed Sep. 26, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/888,993, entitled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Refresh Operations”, filed Feb. 5, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/190,627 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Targeted Refreshing of Memory” filed Nov. 14, 2018. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/281,818, entitled: “Semiconductor Device” filed Sep. 30. |
Kim, et al., “Flipping Bits in MemoryWithout Accessing Them: An Experimental Study of DRAM Disturbance Errors”, IEEE, Jun. 2014, 12 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/186,913 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Dynamic Refresh Allocation” filed Feb. 26, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/187,002 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Targeted Refresh Operations” filed Feb. 26, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/994,338 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Memory Directed Access Pause” filed Aug. 14, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/997,659 titled “Apparatuses, Systems, and Methods for Refresh Modes” filed Aug. 19, 2020; pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/127,654 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Row Hammer Based Cache Lockdown” filed Dec. 13, 2020, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/324,621 titled “Apparatuses And Methods for Pure-Time, Self-Adopt Sampling For Row Hammer Refresh Sampling” filed May 19, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/347,957 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Controlling Steal Rates” filed Jun. 15, 2021, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/432,604 titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Skipped Refresh Operations” filed Jun. 5, 2019, pp. all. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/226,975, titled “Apparatuses and Methods for Staggered Timing of Skipped Refresh Operations” filed Apr. 9, 2021, pp. all. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200082873 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15419590 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 16682606 | US |