1. Area of the Art
The present invention concerns the field of cosmetic treatments for hair loss.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Although most of the human body is relatively hairless, at least compared to most other mammals, the human head is endowed with a more or less luxuriant growth of hair. Over the ages this hair has been the source of endless trials and tribulations. How many teenagers of either sex have spent endless hours adjusting the exact look of their hair? Pity the poor individual whose coiffure is not up to current group standards. This fascination with hair extends beyond ones teenage years and is usually lifelong. But a luxuriant growth of hair is not guaranteed. Hair is damaged or lost as a result of accident, illness, age and even cosmetic treatments. As humans age the quality as well as the quantity of their head hair tends to change. The number of hairs usually decreases in both sexes but often much more rapidly in those of the male persuasion. Color and texture also undergo changes.
Loss of hair and changes in hair quality have spawned a multi-billions dollar industry that seeks to restore an individual's hair to its youthful status. This preoccupation may seem inevitable in today's youth oriented culture, but “cures” for age-related changes in hair seem to be as old as mankind. Ancient civilizations used wigs, hair coloring agents and hats—remedies that are still in widespread use today. Any study of herbal medicine or “magic” potions will uncover a plethora of mixtures that were guaranteed to grow hair on the baldest of pates.
An inspection of the database of issued patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Office reveals hundreds of inventions aimed at overcoming or ameliorating hair loss. The majority of inventions are directed towards medical treatments employing an incredible range of drugs—all promising to grow hair. Another large group of inventions is directed towards improvements in wigs and toupees and related devices intended to minimize the appearance of hair loss. Yet drug-based treatments are often ineffective, slow or fraught with undesirable or even dangerous side effects. Wigs and toupees or “hair pieces” are often costly, cumbersome and “overkill” as a treatment for regions of thinning hair as opposed to overall complete hair loss.
Techniques involving “mini” wigs designed to cover small regions only or methods that weave or otherwise attach strands of hair into thinning areas have been developed to overcome the inherent problems of wigs. However, such techniques are often expensive and require services of a third party for their fabrication and application. Therefore, simpler “cosmetic” approaches have been developed that allow an individual to readily minimize the appearance of overall hair thinning and localized hair loss.
The simplest cosmetic approach involves treating the areas of thinning hair with a coloring composition that minimizes the appearance of a bald region by coloring the scalp to match the hair. Such a treatment will minimize the appearance of a thinning region, but it can be difficult to apply such a coloring agent along a thinning hair line with convincing results. Furthermore, this approach is less effective for white or gray hair as the coloration of the scalp does little to blend in the thinning spot. In addition, this cosmetic approach does little to increase the apparent thickness of the hair.
Perhaps the most satisfactory cosmetic approach to date is the application of short colored fibers and/or powder and particles, known as Hair Building Solids (HBS) to the scalp areas in need of treatment. As used herein HBS includes any type of fibers, powder and/or particles used to enhance the appearance of hair thickness and to disguise the appearance of hair thinness. Ideally, the HBS is colored to match the natural hair color of the user and exhibit properties such that static electricity or other similar interactions allow them to adhere to the hair strands as well as the scalp. HBS treatment can result in a very convincing appearance of thickened hair as well as a reduction in the obviousness of balding regions. In addition, it is possible to use hair sprays or other similar compositions to increase the adherence of the fibers to the hair strands and scalp.
The most apparent difficulty with the HBS approach is the process of applying the material to the scalp. The usual means of application is to sprinkle the material over the regions in need of treatment. However, it may be difficult for the user to evenly sprinkle the material in the proper areas. At least one inventor has attempted to solve this difficulty by developing a device to spray the material into position. U.S. Pat. No. 6,168,781 to Ukaji et al. shows a spraying device which uses a source of propellant (e.g., pressurized gas) to deliver a stream of HBS by directing the gas stream over the surface of a container filled with the material. The gas stream picks up fibers and propels them out a nozzle (see
This approach of the Ukaji et al. invention is hampered by the requirement for a more or less bulky can of propellant. Because the applicator is designed to suspend the fibers within the propellant stream by blowing the stream over the surface of a mass of fibers, a fairly intense propellant stream is needed to ensure adequate suspension of the fibers. This in turn results in a relatively high velocity stream that may impair the naturalistic settling of fibers into position on the hair and scalp. Further, the simultaneous application of adhesive and fibers may cause the fibers to clump together in an unaesthetic manner. Clearly, there is a continued need for an improved applicator to facilitate the use of HBS for the cosmetic treatment of hair loss
The present invention provides an improved applicator for HBS cosmetics. The applicator uses a gentle stream of gas, preferably air, to suspend the fibers and waft them onto the users scalp in a directed manner. This allows even application to a desired region and yet allows the fibers to settle naturally into place in an aesthetically pleasing manner.
The fibers become suspended in the applying gas stream by use of the Bernoulli principle. In a first embodiment a low pressure, low velocity gas stream is directed downwards into a mass of HBS in a closed container. The stream of gas suspends the fibers in the gas which then exits through a small orifice in an upper region of the container. The orifice opens into a tubular passageway that ends in a nozzle. Because the passageway is smaller in diameter than the container, there is, according to the Bernoulli principle, an increase in the velocity of the gas (and suspended fibers) flowing through the passageway. This propels the suspended fibers from the nozzle in a more directed fashion than would be expected from the low velocity of the gas stream directed into a container.
In a second embodiment a low pressure, gas stream is directed though a passageway in close proximity to the upper end of a container of the fibers; the end of the passageway ends in a nozzle. A small opening in the passageway connects to the container. The moving gas stream generates a relative vacuum at the opening and pulls the atmosphere out of the container. At the same time a downward directed passageway diverts some of the gas stream and causes it to flow towards the mass of fibers in the container, striking the fibers at approximately right angles to the surface of the mass. This suspends the fibers within the atmosphere of the container so that suspended fibers are drawn through the small opening and into the gas stream ultimately exiting through the nozzle with the gas stream.
Because these designs provide a separate stream of gas to suspend the fibers, the device is able to operate with an extremely low-pressure gas stream so that the suspended fibers essentially are wafted from the application and settle naturally in a controlled area. The nozzle is preferably simply an orifice having dimension similar to the passageway so that the suspended HBS stream is relatively “defocused.” A preferred embodiment utilizes air as a suspending gas and provides such air from a rubber bulb. The device looks much like a perfume atomizer. However, in an atomizer, the Bernoulli orifice is connected to a dip tube that extends below the surface of the liquid perfume. Here the Bernoulli orifice is located in the lid or in an upper region of the container and a downwardly directed gas stream is provided to suspend the HBS. The user is able to gently squeeze the bulb and because of the efficiency of the fiber suspension process allow controlled puffs of air and fibers to waft onto a directed region of the scalp.
To achieve optimal adhesion of the applied HBS it is desirable to apply a mild adhesive to the hair and scalp prior to HBS application. A template can be used to apply the adhesive along the hairline and also to apply the HBS. Any HBS not adhering can be brushed or blown away. A preferred embodiment of the applicator includes valves to allow the device to alternately apply HBS and provide a stream of air to blow away excess HBS.
The following description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention and sets forth the best modes contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Various modifications, however, will remain readily apparent to those skilled in the art, since the general principles of the present invention have been defined herein specifically to provide an improved applicator for hair building fibers.
A rubber bulb 26 is attached to one end of a air supply tube 28 the other end of which is connected to a nexus 32 attached to the lid 24. The bulb 26 also has a one way intake valve 34 so that squeezing the bulb 26 results in a flow of air into the air supply tube 28. A suspension tube 36 descends from an underside of the lid 24 and extends towards the HBS in the container 22. The suspension tube 36 is in communication with the air supply tube 28 so that a squeeze of the bulb 26 results in a puff of air exiting the suspension tube 36 to strike and suspend the HBS.
A directing tube 38 is axially aligned with the air supply tube 28 an extends from the opposite side of the nexus 32. The directing tube 38 end in a nozzle/orifice 42 which may be of a larger or smaller diameter than the inner diameter of the directing tube 38. An intake orifice 44 is in communication with both the interior of the container 22 and the directing tube 38.
If an adhesive is applied immediately prior to the HBS, the wafted material will become bonded to the scalp and hair in an aesthetically appealing manner. Sprayed polymeric materials similar to hair spray work as adhesives, but most hair sprays dry very rapidly whereas in the present application it may be desirable for the spray to remain tacky for a sufficiently long time to waft on the required amount of HBS. Thereafter the adhesive spray should dry completely to avoid a sticky or tacky feel to the hair. Generally, sprays containing at least some water are desirable because they dry somewhat more slowly than do sprays containing only organic solvents. Acrylics and similar film forming polymers such as VP/VA (vinyl acetate/vinyl propanate) copolymers and PVP (polyvinylpyrrolidone) are good adhesives for the present application. A wide range of suitable polymers is known to those of ordinary skill in the art and can be found in references such as the International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook.
When the bulb 26 is squeezed, a stream of air exits the suspension tube 36 and contacts the HBS 18 within the container 22 causing the fibers to become suspended within the container. In the embodiment of
The applicator 20 does an excellent job of evenly applying HBS to most part of the scalp. However, the hairline, particularly at the forehead is difficult because it represents a more or less sharp boundary which is easily obscured by the wafted HBS from the applicator 20. Therefore, it is preferable to use a hairline template 54 as shown in
While the template 54 can be used in the application of either or both the adhesive and the HBS, it is often sufficient to use the template to apply only the adhesive. In either case, there is likely to be HBS that either does not fall on an adhesive coated region or else exceeds the capacity of the adhesive. Therefore, following application of the HBS, non-adhering HBS can be blown or brushed away to produce a very convincing hairline.
The following claims are thus to be understood to include what is specifically illustrated and described above, what is conceptually equivalent, what can be obviously substituted and also what essentially incorporates the essential idea of the invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the just-described preferred embodiment can be configured without departing from the scope of the invention. The illustrated embodiment has been set forth only for the purposes of example and that should not be taken as limiting the invention. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10606809 | Jun 2003 | US | national |
The present application is a national phase application of PCT application number PCT/US2004/010831 filed Apr. 8, 2004 and designating the United States which in turn claimed priority from U.S. application Ser. No. 10/606,809 filed Jun. 26, 2003.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US04/10831 | 4/8/2004 | WO | 00 | 4/2/2008 |