Apportioning a payment card transaction among multiple payers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10621563
  • Patent Number
    10,621,563
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 7, 2014
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 14, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
The disclosed technique enables a consumer who uses a payment object to pay for goods or services to specify, by using a mobile device, how the transaction amount should be apportioned among multiple payers. In certain embodiments, the technique involves communication between a mobile payment application installed on the consumer's mobile device and a remote payment service system (PSS). The mobile payment application enables the user to specify how many payers there are, who the payers are, and exactly how the transaction amount should be apportioned among the payers. The mobile payment application communicates this information to the PSS, which then executes or triggers reimbursement to carry out the specified apportionment.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

At least one embodiment of the present invention pertains to financial transactions involving payment cards, and more particularly, to a technique for apportioning a payment card transaction among multiple payers.


BACKGROUND

When two or more people want to share the cost of a purchase, apportioning the cost between them can be problematic, especially when one or more of them wants to pay by credit card. Consider, for example, the situation in which a social group gathers for a meal at a restaurant, where everyone is to pay for his or her own food and drink. When it comes time to pay the check, the need to determine how much each person owes and settle the bill creates an inconvenient and sometimes awkward interruption in the social interaction of the group. Making this process go smoothly can be a challenge, even more so if the group includes a mixture of single people and couples or families.


There are various ways of handling this kind of situation. For example, in one common approach, one member of the group uses a credit card, and the other members of the group reimburse that person with cash for their portions. With this approach, it is inconvenient and often time-consuming to have to calculate how much each person (or each couple or family) owes and then collect cash from the other members of the group. Additionally, it is common that some members of the group end up paying more or less than their fair share (with the person who paid by credit card often paying more than his fair share). In another common approach, the group asks the waiter to split the check in a certain manner, and everyone then either pays cash or uses his own credit card. This approach can also be troublesome if the check is not being split equally, and regardless, it is inconvenient and time-consuming for the waiter. In any of these situations, the need to deal with these issues detracts from the social atmosphere of the event.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

One or more embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements.



FIG. 1 illustrates an environment in which the bill splitting technique introduced here can be implemented.



FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating an example of a process for bill splitting in connection with use of a payment card.



FIGS. 3A through 3G show examples of various screen displays that can be generated by a consumer's processing device to enable bill splitting.



FIG. 4 is a high-level block diagram showing an example of processing system in which at least some operations related to the bill splitting technique can be implemented.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In this description, references to “an embodiment”, “one embodiment” or the like, mean that the particular feature, function, structure or characteristic being described is included in at least one embodiment of the technique introduced here. Occurrences of such phrases in this specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment. On the other hand, the embodiments referred to also are not necessarily mutually exclusive.


Introduced here is a technique for apportioning the cost of a purchase or other financial transaction among multiple payers, particularly (though not exclusively) where one of the payers uses a payment card to pay for the transaction. The term “payment card” as used herein means a credit card, debit card, prepaid gift card, or the like, or a card which functions as a combination of any of these mechanism. A payment card is a specific type of payment object. Other types of payment objects are discussed below.


Briefly described, the technique introduced here enables a consumer who uses a payment card to pay for goods or services to specify, by using his mobile device (e.g., a smartphone or tablet computer), how the transaction amount should be apportioned among multiple payers. Such apportionment is called “bill splitting” in this description, as shorthand. In certain embodiments, the technique involves communication between a mobile payment application installed on the consumer's mobile device and a remote payment service system (PSS). The mobile payment application enables the user to specify (either at the time of the transaction or at a later time) how many payers there are, who the payers are, and exactly how the transaction amount should be apportioned (how the bill should be split) among the payers. The mobile payment application communicates this information to the PSS, which then executes or triggers execution of the transfer of funds to carry out the specified apportionment.


The technique introduced here makes bill splitting relatively quick and easy compared to traditional methods. Furthermore, since the apportionment can be specified by the consumer and effectuated well after the transaction has completed, the technique greatly reduces the potential for awkward interruptions to the social flow of group events due to bill splitting issues.


As described further below, to initiate a payment transaction according to one embodiment of the technique, a consumer first presents a payment card to a merchant. The merchant swipes the payment card of the consumer with a card reader at the merchant's point-of-sale (POS) system, in the traditional manner. The term “swipe” here refers to any manner of triggering a physical card reader to read a physical card, such as passing a card through a magnetic stripe card reader, optical scanner, or smartcard reader, radio frequency identification (RFID) reader, or the like. The term “sale”, such as in “point-of-sale,” refers to any type of payment-oriented transaction, including a lease or rental for example, and is not limited to an actual purchase.


In response to the card swipe, the merchant's POS system transmits onto a network a standard transaction approval request, which gets routed to the PSS. The transaction approval request includes data commonly associated with traditional payment card transaction approval requests. However, in certain embodiments the consumer's payment card bears a card number such that the transaction approval request gets routed to the PSS. When the PSS receives the transaction approval request, the PSS may determine whether the transaction can be approved, or it may signal another entity to make that determination. The PSS then communicates the result of the request (e.g., approved or denied) to the merchant's POS system.


Also in response to the transaction approval request, the PSS identifies a mobile device associated with the consumer and sends a message indicating the result of the request to the consumer's mobile device. The PSS can identify the mobile device of the consumer by performing a database lookup, based on an association between the consumer's payment card and the mobile device, which the consumer previously specified to the PSS. The PSS then sends to the consumer's mobile device a message directed to a mobile payment application installed on the consumer's mobile device. The message is configured to cause the mobile payment application to output to the consumer a user interface that prompts the consumer to (optionally) specify apportionment information indicating the manner of apportioning the transaction amount among two or more payers (e.g., people). The payers may all be human beings, however, it is possible that one or more of the payers may be a non-human entity, such as a corporation or other organization.


In some embodiments, the mobile payment application, in response to the message from the PSS, allows the consumer to specify the number of payers for the transaction and the manner in which the transaction amount should be apportioned and the names of the payers. In some embodiments, the mobile payment application can also suggest potential payers to the consumer. The suggestion may be based on, for example, an address book of the consumer stored in the mobile device, a list of recent contacts of the consumer stored on the mobile device, information on other nearby users of the mobile payment application, or a combination thereof.


After the consumer has input the apportionment information to the mobile device, the mobile payment application causes the mobile device to transmit a message to convey that apportionment information to the PSS. The PSS then executes or triggers a reimbursement process to carry out the desired apportionment, according to the apportionment information received from the mobile device.


In certain embodiments, the consumer's payment card has a pre-established association with the PSS, such that any transaction approval request relating to that card will get routed to the PSS. In such embodiments, the consumer's payment card may be a “proxy card.” A proxy card is a card that bears a card number/account number that appears to be that of a real credit or debit card account (i.e., it is in the correct format), but where that card/account number is actually only a proxy for the consumer's real card/account number. In that case, the consumer's real account number is stored by the PSS in association with the proxy card account number, and is used to pay for a transaction made using the card. Further, such a proxy card may be associated with multiple accounts and/or other payment mechanisms of different types (e.g., credit card accounts, debit card accounts, etc.) of the consumer, where any one of those payment mechanisms can be selected by the consumer or automatically by the PSS to pay for a given transaction.


Additionally, while the consumer generally uses a mobile device to specify the apportionment of the transaction in the embodiments emphasized herein, in other embodiments the consumer may use a processing device other than a mobile device to specify that information, such as a conventional personal computer (PC). In such embodiments, the mobile payment application can be replaced by a more conventional software application in such processing device, where such software application has functionality similar to that of the mobile payment application as described herein.


In certain embodiments, a consumer can use a payment object other than a payment card to initiate a transaction with bill splitting as described above. An example of another type of payment object is a biometrically identifiable object, such as a person's finger (e.g., for fingerprint recognition), face, iris or retina. Alternatively, a payment object can be a software object or virtual object, such as a virtual wallet.



FIG. 1 illustrates an environment in which the bill splitting technique introduced here can be implemented. The environment includes a mobile device 102 belonging to a user 101 (also referred to as “customer” or “consumer”), and a merchant POS system 104. The mobile device 102 can be, for example, a smart phone, tablet computer, notebook computer, or any other form of mobile processing device. A mobile payment application 120 runs on the user's mobile device 102. The environment also includes a computer system 114 of the merchant's acquirer, a computer system 118 of an issuing bank, a computer system 116 of a card payment network, and a computer system 108 of a payment service (hereinafter “payment service system (PSS) 108”). Each of the aforementioned computer systems can include one or more distinct physical computers and/or other processing devices which, in the case of multiple devices, can be connected to each other through one or more wired and/or wireless networks. All of the aforementioned devices are coupled to each other through an internetwork 106, which can be or include the Internet and one or more wireless networks (e.g., a WiFi network and/or a cellular telecommunications network).


In a traditional credit card transaction, the merchant would swipe the user's credit card through a card reader 112 at the POS system 104. The POS system 104 would then send data read from the card (e.g., the cardholders name, credit card number, expiration date and card verification value (CW)) to the computer system 114 of the merchant's acquirer (hereinafter “acquirer 114”). The acquirer 114 would then send this data to the computer system 116 of the card payment network (e.g., Visa or MasterCard) (hereinafter “card payment network 116”), which would forward the data to the computer system 118 of the issuing bank (hereinafter “issuer 118). If the transaction is approved by the issuer 118, a payment authorization message would be sent from the issuer 118 to the merchant POS system 104 via a path generally opposite of that described above.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a process for bill splitting in accordance with the technique introduced here. For purposes of illustration only, the process of FIG. 2 is explained with reference to certain elements illustrated in FIG. 1. The process begins at step 201, in which the merchant POS system 104 initiates a payment transaction by reading card data from the consumer's payment card 103 in response to a card swipe through the card reader 112. The payment card 103 can be an actual credit or debit card of the consumer, for example, or it can instead be a proxy card such as described above, e.g., a card issued by the PSS 108 and associated with one or more financial accounts of the consumer. The card data can include, for example, the consumer's name, card number, card expiration date, and card verification value (CW). At step 202, in response to the card swipe the merchant POS system 104 transmits onto the internetwork 106 a transaction approval request that includes data about the transaction (“transaction data”), for transmission to the PSS 108. The transaction data can include, for example, the aforementioned card data as well as the amount of the transaction, current date and time, data identifying the merchant and the merchant's merchant category code (MCC).


The transaction approval request may be transmitted directly to the PSS 108, or it may get routed to the PSS 108 through one or more intermediary entities, such as the acquirer 114 and/or card payment network 116, etc. In certain embodiments, the card number on the consumer's payment card is sufficient to enable routing entities to determine that the transaction approval request should be routed to the PSS 108, such as in the case where the payment card is a proxy card issued by the PSS 108. Upon receiving the transaction approval request (step 203), the PSS 108 approves the transaction at step 204 (for the sake of simplicity, the scenario in which the transaction is denied is not discussed here, since it is not germane to the technique being introduced here).


In response to the transaction being approved, the PSS 108 performs at least the following two additional operations. At step 205, the PSS 108 sends onto internetwork 106 a transaction approval message, for transmission to the merchant POS system 104. In addition, at step 208 the PSS 108 transmits a virtual receipt message onto internetwork 106, for transmission to the mobile device 102 of the consumer over a wireless communications network. The virtual receipt message contains information regarding the transaction, i.e., a virtual receipt, including whether the transaction has been approved, the amount of the transaction, the name of the merchant, and in at least some instances, an itemization of the items purchased in (or otherwise the subject of) the transaction. Note that steps 205 and 208 can be performed in any order or concurrently. At step 206, the merchant POS system 104 receives the transaction approval message sent by the PSS 108 and, in response, it outputs a conventional transaction approval indication to the merchant at step 207. The indication may be in the form of, for example, a printed receipt, a message displayed on a display device, or both.


Additionally, at step 209 the user's mobile device 102 receives the virtual receipt message sent by the PSS 108. Within the user's mobile device 102, the virtual receipt message is conveyed up through the various lower protocol layers to the mobile payment application (hereinafter simply “mobile application”) 120, which recognizes the virtual receipt message as such. In response to recognizing this message, at step 210 the mobile application 120 causes the mobile device 102 to display the virtual receipt to the consumer and to prompt the consumer to indicate whether bill splitting is desired. An example of what such a display may look like is illustrated in FIG. 3A. The consumer can indicate that he would like to split the bill by, for example, touching the highlighted “Yes” button on a touchscreen display of the mobile device 102. If the consumer indicates that bill splitting is not desired, the process ends.


Note that while bill splitting capability is desirable in certain settings, such as in restaurants, it may not be appropriate with every type of transaction or merchant. For example, it is uncommon (though not inconceivable) to split among multiple people the cost of airline tickets or a purchase at a department store. Therefore, in some embodiments the consumer is only prompted to split the bill if the transaction relates to a certain type of merchant, such as a restaurant or other type of establishment in which bill splitting is common. The type of merchant may be determined, for example, from the merchant category code (MCC) commonly included in a transaction approval request sent from a merchant's POS system. The determination of the type of merchant may be made by the PSS 108, in which case the virtual receipt message sent from the POS 108 to the user's mobile device 102 (step 208) can include a flag or other similar indication, to indicate to the mobile application 120 whether to output the bill splitting prompt to the consumer.


Referring still to FIG. 2, the mobile application 120 receives the consumer's input in response to the prompt at step 211. Notably, the user can provide this input at any time convenient for the consumer, which may be while the consumer is still present at the merchant or at a later time. This flexibility helps to avoid disrupting the social flow in, for example, a group meal at a restaurant. Assuming the consumer indicates that bill splitting is desired, a mobile application 120 then prompts the consumer at step 212 to specify how and between whom the transaction amount should be apportioned. After the mobile application 120 has received all of the detailed apportionment information from the consumer, specifying the apportionment of the transaction amount (step 213), the mobile application 120 at step 214 causes the mobile device 102 to send a message indicating that desired apportionment to the PSS 108, via the wireless network.



FIGS. 3B through 3G show additional examples of screen displays that may be generated by the mobile device 102 to solicit and receive the apportionment information from the consumer. For example, initially the mobile device 102 may output a display such as illustrated in FIG. 3B, in which the consumer is asked to input the number of payers into an input field 302. As noted above, the mobile application 120 can suggest payers to the consumer. The consumer may choose the appropriate option either to have the mobile application 120 suggest payers or to identify the payers manually, as indicated in FIG. 3C. Alternatively, the user could input his choice of receiving the suggestion or manual input as a configuration setting of the mobile application 120, prior to operation.


The mobile application 120 can generate a list of suggested payers based on, for example, the consumer's address book stored in the mobile device 120 and/or the consumer's recently used contacts stored on the mobile device 120. In addition, or as an alternative, the mobile application 120 may identify other nearby users of the mobile application as potential payers. For example, the mobile application 120 may invoke a short-range wireless communication feature of the mobile device 102, such as Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy, infrared communication, WiFi, or the like, to identify other nearby mobile devices running instances of the mobile application. In some embodiments such other instances of the mobile application would be associated with other users who are registered with the PSS 108. Assuming the user chooses to receive a list of suggested payers, the user is given the choice to select or not select each suggested payer, as illustrated in FIG. 3D, and further is enabled to specify additional payers manually. The consumer can indicate that he is satisfied with the selections by touching the Request Cash button 304 or other similar control. FIG. 3E shows an example of the screen in which the user can specify payers manually. In various embodiments, the user can specify payees by name, email address, or other type of identifying information.


In some embodiments, after inputting the payers, the mobile application 120 prompts the consumer to input how the transaction amount should be apportioned among the specified payers. As illustrated in FIG. 3F, the options in this regard may include dividing the transaction amount equally among the payers, specifying a specific amount for each payer, specifying a percentage of the total amount for each payer, or (if the mobile device received an itemized receipt) assigning the cost of specific items to specific payers. FIG. 3G illustrates an example of a display screen that includes an itemized virtual receipt, in which the consumer can assign a payer to individual items involved in the transaction. In the itemized option, if the transaction amount included tax, the mobile application 120 can also compute the relevant amount of tax to assign to each payer, based on the cost of their items.


After the mobile application 120 has received all of the necessary user inputs from the consumer, specifying the apportionment of the transaction amount (step 213), a mobile application 120 causes the mobile device 102 at step 214 to send a message indicating that desired apportionment to the PSS 108, via the wireless network. The PSS 108 receives the message from the mobile device 102 indicating the desired apportionment at step 215. At step 216 the PSS 108 executes or triggers a process to carry out the apportionment according to the apportionment information received from the mobile device 102. The process of actually carrying out the apportionment specified by the consumer is called “reimbursement” herein.


Any of various methods can be used for reimbursement, and the details of such methods are not necessary for understanding the technique introduced above. Nonetheless, to facilitate better understanding of the technique introduced above, it is noted that reimbursement can include, for example, the PSS 108 simply sending an email or other type of electronic message to each specified payee, requesting that they reimburse the consumer for their portions of the transaction amount. In other embodiments, the consumer may carry his own personal card reader, such as a card reader that is removably attachable to his mobile device, and the consumer may then use that card reader with his mobile device to accept credit card reimbursement payments from the other payers. In such cases, the consumer may be preregistered with the PPS 108 as a “merchant” to be able to accept credit card payments in this manner.


In some embodiments, reimbursement may be accomplished by enabling one or more of the specified payee's to reimburse the consumer by using a standard person-to-person electronic messaging protocol to transfer funds. In one such embodiment, for example, a payee sends an email to a predetermined email address associated with a third-party payment system, which may be, or may be associated with, the PSS 108, for example. The email includes the amount to be paid and the email address of the intended recipient of the funds (where in this example, the intended recipient is the consumer who initially paid for the transaction). The payment system, upon receiving the email, looks up a financial account of the sender of the email (who has previously registered with the payment system) and, if available, a financial account of the specified recipient (who may or may not have previously registered with a payment system). The payment system then carries out or requests a transfer of the specified amount from the sender's account to the recipient account, if it knows the account number of the recipient; otherwise, the payment system sends an email to the email address of the specified recipient, informing the recipient of the attempted payment and inviting the recipient to provide a financial account number to the payment system in order to receive the payment.



FIG. 4 is a high-level block diagram showing an example of a processing device 400 that can represent any of the devices described above, such as the mobile device 102, the merchant POS system 104, payment service system 108, acquirer system 114, card payment network 116, or issuer system 118. As noted above, any of these systems may include two or more processing devices such as represented in FIG. 9, which may be coupled to each other via a network or multiple networks.


In the illustrated embodiment, the processing system 400 includes one or more processors 410, memory 411, a communication device 412, and one or more input/output (I/O) devices 413, all coupled to each other through an interconnect 414. The interconnect 414 may be or include one or more conductive traces, buses, point-to-point connections, controllers, adapters and/or other conventional connection devices. The processor(s) 410 may be or include, for example, one or more general-purpose programmable microprocessors, microcontrollers, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable gate arrays, or the like, or a combination of such devices. The processor(s) 410 control the overall operation of the processing device 400. Memory 411 may be or include one or more physical storage devices, which may be in the form of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM) (which may be erasable and programmable), flash memory, miniature hard disk drive, or other suitable type of storage device, or a combination of such devices. Memory 411 may store data and/or instructions 415 that configure the processor(s) 410 to execute operations in accordance with the techniques described above. The communication device 412 may be or include, for example, an Ethernet adapter, cable modem, Wi-Fi adapter, cellular transceiver, Bluetooth transceiver, or the like, or a combination thereof. Depending on the specific nature and purpose of the processing device 400, the I/O devices 413 can include devices such as a display (which may be a touch screen display), audio speaker, keyboard, mouse or other pointing device, microphone, camera, etc.


Unless contrary to physical possibility, it is envisioned that (i) the methods/steps described above may be performed in any sequence and/or in any combination, and that (ii) the components of respective embodiments may be combined in any manner.


The techniques introduced above can be implemented by programmable circuitry programmed/configured by software and/or firmware, or entirely by special-purpose circuitry, or by a combination of such forms. Such special-purpose circuitry (if any) can be in the form of, for example, one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.


Software or firmware to implement the techniques introduced here may be stored on a machine-readable storage medium and may be executed by one or more general-purpose or special-purpose programmable microprocessors. A “machine-readable medium”, as the term is used herein, includes any mechanism that can store information in a form accessible by a machine (a machine may be, for example, a computer, network device, cellular phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), manufacturing tool, any device with one or more processors, etc.). For example, a machine-accessible medium includes recordable/non-recordable media (e.g., read-only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; etc.), etc.


Note that any and all of the embodiments described above can be combined with each other, except to the extent that it may be stated otherwise above or to the extent that any such embodiments might be mutually exclusive in function and/or structure.


Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be recognized that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described, but can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving, by a processor of a computer system operated by a third-party payment service, a first message sent from a point-of-sale system via a first network, wherein the first message is indicative of a request for approval of a payment transaction between a consumer and a merchant, in which a payment object associated with a first financial account of the consumer is used, the first message including a transaction amount for the payment transaction, and wherein the third-party payment service is not the merchant, the consumer, or an issuer of the payment object;receiving, by the processor, a merchant category code (MCC) associated with the point-of-sale system;determining, by the processor, a type of merchant associated with the point-of-sale system based on the MCC provided by the point-of-sale system;based on the determined type of merchant, identifying, by the processor, the first financial account of the consumer and a second financial account of the merchant, and causing, by the processor, a first electronic transfer of funds to the second financial account of the merchant from the first financial account of the consumer; andfurther based on the determined type of merchant, executing steps including: determining, by the processor, information usable to communicate with a mobile device associated with the consumer, based on stored data representing an association previously created by the consumer between the payment object and the mobile device;causing, by the processor, a second message to be sent to the mobile device associated with the consumer via a second network;including, by the processor in the second message, an indicator indicating whether or not to prompt the consumer to specify an apportionment of the transaction amount among a plurality of financial accounts, wherein each financial account of the plurality of financial accounts is associated with a different person of a plurality of persons, the plurality of financial accounts including at least the first financial account of the consumer and a third financial account of a person other than the consumer, wherein the indicator corresponds to the determination of the type of merchant based on the MCC, wherein the second message is generated, based on the determined type of merchant, causing the mobile device to output a suggestion of one or more persons of the plurality of persons among whom the transaction amount is to be apportioned, and wherein the second message is generated further causing the mobile device to output to the consumer one of: a user interface for enabling the consumer to apportion the transaction amount by at least one of: an amount, a percentage of the transaction amount, or items included in the payment transaction; andan itemization indicating items included in the payment transaction, and for enabling the consumer to apportion a cost of any of said items to a specified person;based on the indicator included in the second message, receiving a third message at the processor, wherein the third message is representative of a wireless message transmitted from the mobile device via the second network in response to the consumer having specified the apportionment of the transaction amount at the mobile device, the third message including data indicative of the apportionment of the transaction amount and the third financial account of the person other than the consumer; andin response to the third message and based on the data indicative of the apportionment of the transaction amount, executing, by the processor, a second electronic transfer of funds to the first financial account of the consumer from the third financial account of the person other than the consumer.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the second message is generated so as to cause the mobile device to determine the suggestion of the one or more persons from a stored contact list of the consumer.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the second message is generated so as to cause the mobile device to determine the suggestion of the one or more persons by identifying users of a particular payment mechanism who are within a range of a short-range wireless communication feature of the mobile device.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the second message is generated so as to cause the mobile device to prompt the consumer to provide an electronic messaging address of each person, other than the consumer, to whom a portion of the transaction amount is to be apportioned.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein executing the steps is triggered only when the first message contains the MCC.
  • 6. A method comprising: receiving, at a mobile processing device associated with a consumer via a first network, a first message indicative of a first electronic transfer of funds from a first financial account of the consumer to a second financial account of a merchant caused by a remote payment service system operated by a third-party payment service, the remote payment service system causing the first electronic transfer in response to receiving another message from a point-of-sale system of the merchant via a second network, wherein the another message is indicative of a financial transaction in which the consumer has used a payment object associated with the first financial account of the consumer, the another message including merchant data associated with the point-of-sale system, wherein the first message comprises an indicator included by the remote payment service system, wherein the indicator indicates whether or not to output a prompt to apportion a transaction amount of the financial transaction, the indicator corresponding to a determination of a type of merchant based on the merchant data, wherein the third-party payment service is not the merchant, the consumer, or an issuer of the payment object, wherein the first message is generated, based on the determined type of merchant, causing the mobile processing device to output a suggestion of one or more payers of a plurality of payers among whom the transaction amount is to be apportioned, and wherein the first message is generated further causing the mobile processing device to output to the consumer one of: a user interface for enabling the consumer to apportion the transaction amount by at least one of: an amount, a percentage of the transaction amount, or items included in a payment transaction; andan itemization indicating items included in the payment transaction, and for enabling the consumer to apportion a cost of any of said items to a specified person;in response to the first message and the indicator, causing the mobile processing device, associated with the consumer, to output an indication of the financial transaction and the prompt to apportion the transaction amount of the financial transaction among a plurality of financial accounts, wherein each financial account of the plurality of financial accounts is associated with a different payer of the plurality of payers, and wherein the plurality of financial accounts include at least the first financial account of the consumer and a third financial account of the person other than the consumer;receiving, at the mobile processing device associated with the consumer, user input specifying the apportionment of the transaction amount among the plurality of financial accounts; andin response to the user input, causing the mobile processing device, associated with the consumer, to transmit a message indicative of the apportionment and the plurality of financial accounts to the remote payment service system via the first network, wherein in response to the message indicative of the apportionment, the remote payment service causes a second electronic transfer of funds to the first financial account of the consumer from the third financial account of the person other than the consumer.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the payment object is a payment card.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 6, further comprising: in response to the first message and the indicator, causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to determine the suggestion of the one or more payers from a stored contact list of the consumer.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 6, further comprising: in response to the first message and the indicator, causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to determine the suggestion of the one or more payers by causing an instance of a mobile application running on the mobile processing device to use a short-range communication feature of the mobile processing device to identify other users of the mobile application who are within a range of the mobile processing device.
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 6, further comprising: in response to the first message and the indicator, causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to prompt the consumer to provide an electronic messaging address of each person, other than the consumer, to whom a portion of the transaction amount is to be apportioned.
  • 11. A machine-readable non-transitory storage medium storing program code that, when stored in a mobile processing device associated with a consumer, configures the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to perform operations comprising: receiving, at the mobile processing device associated with the consumer via a first network, a first message indicative of a first electronic transfer of funds from a first financial account of the consumer to a second financial account of a merchant caused by a remote payment service system operated by a third-party payment service, the remote payment service system causing the first electronic transfer in response to receiving another message from a point-of-sale system of the merchant via a second network, wherein the another message is indicative of a financial transaction in which the consumer has used a payment object, wherein the payment object is associated with the first financial account of the consumer, the another message including a merchant category code (MCC) associated with the point-of-sale system, wherein the first message comprises an indicator included by the remote payment service system, wherein the indicator indicates whether or not to output a prompt to apportion a transaction amount of the financial transaction, the indicator corresponding to a determination of a type of merchant associated with the point-of-sale system based on the MCC, and wherein the third-party payment service is not the merchant, the consumer, or an issuer of the payment object;in response to the first message and the indicator, causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to output an indication of the financial transaction and the prompt to input the apportionment of the transaction amount of the financial transaction among a plurality of persons, including causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to output a suggestion of one or more persons of the plurality of persons among whom the transaction amount can be apportioned;in response to the first message and the indicator, further causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to output to the consumer one of: a user interface for enabling the consumer to apportion the transaction amount by at least one of: an amount, a percentage of the transaction amount, or items included in a payment transaction; andan itemization indicating items included in the transaction, and for enabling the consumer to apportion a cost of any of said items to a specified person;receiving, at the mobile processing device associated with the consumer, user input specifying the apportionment of the transaction amount, in response to the outputting to the consumer; andin response to the user input, causing the mobile processing device, associated with the consumer to transmit a message indicative of the apportionment over a wireless first network, wherein based on the message indicative of the apportionment, the remote payment service causes a second electronic transfer of funds to the first financial account of the consumer from the third financial account of the person other than the consumer.
  • 12. The machine-readable non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11, wherein the payment object is a payment card.
  • 13. The machine-readable non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11, said operations further comprising: in response to the first message and the indicator, causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to determine the suggestion of the one or more persons from a stored contact list of the consumer.
  • 14. The machine-readable non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11, said operations further comprising: in response to the first message and the indicator, causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to determine the suggestion of the one or more persons by causing an instance of a processing application running on the mobile processing device to use a short-range communication feature of the mobile processing device to identify other users of the processing application who are within a range of the mobile processing device.
  • 15. The machine-readable non-transitory storage medium as recited in claim 11, said operations further comprising: in response to the first message and the indicator, causing the mobile processing device associated with the consumer to prompt the consumer to provide an electronic messaging address of each person, other than the consumer, to whom a portion of the transaction amount is to be apportioned.
  • 16. A computer system comprising: a communication device through which the computer system can communicate with remote devices over a network;a memory; anda processor, coupled to the communication device and the memory, to control the computer system, the processor configured to cause the computer system to perform operations that include: receiving, by the processor, a first message sent from a point-of-sale system via a first network, wherein the first message is indicative of a request for approval of a payment transaction between a consumer and a merchant, in which a payment object associated with a first financial account of the consumer is used, the first message including a transaction amount for the payment transaction, the processor being operated by a third-party payment service that is not the merchant, the consumer, or an issuer of the payment object;receiving, by the processor, a merchant category code (MCC) associated with the point-of-sale system;determining, by the processor, a type of merchant associated with the point-of-sale system based on the MCC provided by the point-of-sale system;based on the determined type of merchant, identifying the first financial account of the consumer and a second financial account of the merchant and causing a first electronic transfer of funds to the second financial account of the merchant from the first financial account of the consumer; andfurther based on the determined type of merchant, executing steps including: determining information usable to communicate with a mobile device associated with the consumer, based on stored data representing an association previously created by the consumer between the payment object and the mobile device;causing a second message to be sent to the mobile device associated with the consumer via a second network;including, by the processor in the second message, an indicator indicating whether or not to prompt the consumer to specify an apportionment of the transaction amount among a plurality of financial accounts, wherein each financial account of the plurality of financial accounts is associated with a different person of a plurality of persons, the plurality of financial accounts including at least the first financial account of the consumer and a third financial account of a person other than the consumer, wherein the indicator corresponds to the determination of the type of merchant based on the MCC, wherein the second message is generated, based on the determined type of merchant, causing the mobile device to output a suggestion of one or more persons of the plurality of persons among whom the transaction amount is to be apportioned, and wherein the second message is generated further causing the mobile device to output to the consumer one of: a user interface for enabling the consumer to apportion the transaction amount by at least one of: an amount, a percentage of the transaction amount, or items included in the payment transaction; andan itemization indicating items included in the payment transaction and for enabling the consumer to apportion a cost of any of said items to a specified person;based on the indicator included in the second message, receiving, by the processor, a third message representative of a wireless message transmitted from the mobile device via the second network in response to the consumer having specified the apportionment of the transaction amount at the mobile device, the third message including data indicative of the apportionment of the transaction amount and the third financial account of the person other than the consumer; andin response to the third message and based on the data indicative of the apportionment of the transaction amount, executing a second electronic transfer of funds to the first financial account of the consumer from the third financial account of the person other than the consumer.
  • 17. The computer system as recited in claim 16, wherein the second message is generated so as to cause the mobile device to determine the suggestion of one or more persons from a stored contact list of the consumer.
  • 18. The computer system as recited in claim 16, wherein the second message is generated so as to cause the mobile device to determine the suggestion of the one or more persons by identifying users of a particular payment mechanism who are within a range of a short-range wireless communication feature of the mobile device.
  • 19. The computer system as recited in claim 16, wherein the second message is generated so as to cause the mobile device to prompt the consumer to provide an electronic messaging address of each person, other than the consumer, to whom a portion of the transaction amount is to be apportioned.
  • 20. The computer system as recited in claim 16, wherein executing the steps is triggered only when the first message contains the MCC.
  • 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the prompt caused by the second message, based on the determined type of merchant, comprises: a list of suggested financial accounts;a text box for receiving information associated with a financial account; ora combination thereof.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the first message further includes the MCC.
  • 23. The computer system of claim 16, wherein the first message further includes the MCC.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/921,373, filed on Dec. 27, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (293)
Number Name Date Kind
5276311 Hennige Jan 1994 A
5530232 Taylor Jun 1996 A
5585787 Wallerstein Dec 1996 A
5590038 Pitroda Dec 1996 A
5960411 Hartman et al. Sep 1999 A
6175922 Wang Jan 2001 B1
6193155 Walker et al. Feb 2001 B1
6263352 Cohen Jul 2001 B1
6341353 Herman et al. Jan 2002 B1
6422462 Cohen Jul 2002 B1
6427911 Barnes et al. Aug 2002 B1
6764005 Cooper Jul 2004 B2
7085812 Sherwood Aug 2006 B1
7155411 Blinn et al. Dec 2006 B1
7233843 Budhraja et al. Jun 2007 B2
7478054 Adams et al. Jan 2009 B1
7493390 Bobde et al. Feb 2009 B2
7552087 Schultz et al. Jun 2009 B2
7575166 McNamara Aug 2009 B2
7580873 Silver et al. Aug 2009 B1
7603382 Halt, Jr. Oct 2009 B2
7805378 Berardi et al. Sep 2010 B2
7818809 Sobel et al. Oct 2010 B1
8060259 Budhraja et al. Nov 2011 B2
8190514 Bishop et al. May 2012 B2
8266551 Boldyrev et al. Sep 2012 B2
8280793 Kempkes et al. Oct 2012 B1
8401710 Budhraja et al. Mar 2013 B2
8423459 Green et al. Apr 2013 B1
8459544 Casey et al. Jun 2013 B2
8498888 Raff et al. Jul 2013 B1
8498900 Spirin Jul 2013 B1
8577731 Cope et al. Nov 2013 B1
8577803 Chatterjee et al. Nov 2013 B2
8579203 Lambeth et al. Nov 2013 B1
8602296 Velline et al. Dec 2013 B1
8630586 Dvortsov et al. Jan 2014 B2
8676119 Cohen et al. Mar 2014 B2
8712854 Rafferty et al. Apr 2014 B1
8788418 Spodak et al. Jul 2014 B2
8855312 Hodgman et al. Oct 2014 B1
8859337 Gaul et al. Oct 2014 B2
8939357 Perry Jan 2015 B1
8972298 Kunz et al. Mar 2015 B2
9010644 Workley Apr 2015 B1
9064249 Borovsky et al. Jun 2015 B1
9092767 Andrews et al. Jul 2015 B1
9092776 Dessert Jul 2015 B2
9092828 Hosp Jul 2015 B2
9183480 Quigley et al. Nov 2015 B1
9881305 Lewis et al. Jan 2018 B1
20030061157 Hirka et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065805 Barnes, Jr. Apr 2003 A1
20030115126 Pitroda Jun 2003 A1
20040030601 Pond et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040138999 Friedman et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040204990 Lee et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215520 Butler et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040219971 Ciancio et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050246245 Satchell et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060032906 Sines Feb 2006 A1
20060086333 Wah et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060131385 Kim Jun 2006 A1
20060146839 Hurwitz Jul 2006 A1
20060206488 Distasio Sep 2006 A1
20060261149 Raghavendra Tulluri Nov 2006 A1
20070069013 Seifert et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073619 Smith Mar 2007 A1
20070150387 Seubert et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070208930 Blank et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070255653 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20070255662 Tumminaro Nov 2007 A1
20080037442 Bill Feb 2008 A1
20080040265 Rackley, III et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080052176 Buchheit Feb 2008 A1
20080078831 Johnson et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080133351 White et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080177826 Pitroda Jul 2008 A1
20080197201 Manessis et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080222047 Boalt Sep 2008 A1
20080262925 Kim et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270246 Chen Oct 2008 A1
20080277465 Pletz et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080296978 Finkenzeller et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090043702 Bennett Feb 2009 A1
20090063312 Hurst Mar 2009 A1
20090070228 Ronen Mar 2009 A1
20090094126 Killian et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090099961 Ogilvy Apr 2009 A1
20090106138 Smith et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112766 Hammed et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119190 Realini May 2009 A1
20090159663 Mullen et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090192904 Patterson et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090266884 Killian Oct 2009 A1
20090271265 Lay et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090288012 Hertel Nov 2009 A1
20090313132 McKenna et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319421 Mathis et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090319638 Faith et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100010906 Grecia Jan 2010 A1
20100076777 Paretti et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082420 Trifiletti et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100102125 Gatto Apr 2010 A1
20100174596 Gilman et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100217674 Kean Aug 2010 A1
20100217699 Bookstaff Aug 2010 A1
20100223145 Dragt Sep 2010 A1
20100306099 Hirson et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110029416 Greenspan Feb 2011 A1
20110035319 Brand et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110047013 McKenzie, III Feb 2011 A1
20110055084 Singh Mar 2011 A1
20110071892 Dickelman Mar 2011 A1
20110087550 Fordyce, III et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110125633 Aaltonen et al. May 2011 A1
20110131128 Vaananen Jun 2011 A1
20110145049 Hertel Jun 2011 A1
20110145052 Lin et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153438 Dragt Jun 2011 A1
20110178883 Granbery et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110180598 Morgan et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110218871 Singh Sep 2011 A1
20110231270 Dykes et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246284 Chaikin Oct 2011 A1
20110251892 Laracey Oct 2011 A1
20110251962 Hruska Oct 2011 A1
20110258689 Cohen et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270747 Xu Nov 2011 A1
20110276418 Velani Nov 2011 A1
20110295750 Rammal Dec 2011 A1
20110302019 Proctor, Jr. et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110302080 White et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313840 Mason et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313867 Silver Dec 2011 A9
20110313871 Greenwood Dec 2011 A1
20110320345 Taveau et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120011062 Baker et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120011072 Lodolo Jan 2012 A1
20120016731 Smith et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029990 Fisher Feb 2012 A1
20120030044 Hurst Feb 2012 A1
20120059701 van der Veen et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120059718 Ramer et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120059758 Carlson Mar 2012 A1
20120084210 Farahmand Apr 2012 A1
20120110568 Abel et al. May 2012 A1
20120143772 Abadir Jun 2012 A1
20120150611 Isaacson et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120150643 Wolfe Jun 2012 A1
20120150742 Poon et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120166311 Dwight Jun 2012 A1
20120166331 Varsavsky Waisman-Diamond Jun 2012 A1
20120185355 Kilroy Jul 2012 A1
20120197740 Grigg et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120197743 Grigg et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120197794 Grigg Aug 2012 A1
20120209749 Hammad Aug 2012 A1
20120209773 Ranganathan Aug 2012 A1
20120214416 Kent Aug 2012 A1
20120244885 Hefetz Sep 2012 A1
20120253852 Pourfallah et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120254031 Walker et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271707 Harrison Oct 2012 A1
20120271725 Cheng Oct 2012 A1
20120278727 Ananthakrishnan et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120290422 Bhinder Nov 2012 A1
20120290609 Britt Nov 2012 A1
20120296679 Im Nov 2012 A1
20120296726 Dessert Nov 2012 A1
20120310760 Phillips et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120323685 Ullah Dec 2012 A1
20130006773 Lutnick et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130019284 Pacyga Jan 2013 A1
20130024341 Jeon et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130024364 Shrivastava et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130024371 Hariramani et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030889 Davich et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130030997 Spodak et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130041824 Gupta Feb 2013 A1
20130048719 Bennett Feb 2013 A1
20130050080 Dahl et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130054320 Dorso et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130065672 Gelman et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130066783 Wolff Mar 2013 A1
20130073363 Boal Mar 2013 A1
20130103574 Conrad et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130103946 Binenstock Apr 2013 A1
20130117329 Bank et al. May 2013 A1
20130124333 Doughty et al. May 2013 A1
20130132274 Henderson et al. May 2013 A1
20130134216 Spodak et al. May 2013 A1
20130134962 Kamel et al. May 2013 A1
20130138563 Gilder et al. May 2013 A1
20130144707 Isaacson Jun 2013 A1
20130151613 Dhawan et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130159081 Shastry Jun 2013 A1
20130159172 Kim Jun 2013 A1
20130159173 Sivaraman Jun 2013 A1
20130159446 Carlson et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130166402 Parento et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130166445 Isaacson Jun 2013 A1
20130173407 Killian Jul 2013 A1
20130179227 Booth et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130181045 Dessert Jul 2013 A1
20130198018 Baig Aug 2013 A1
20130204727 Rothschild Aug 2013 A1
20130204777 Irwin, Jr. et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204793 Kerridge et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218697 Kingston et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130218721 Borhan Aug 2013 A1
20130225081 Doss et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130228616 Bhosle et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130236109 Madden et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130246203 Laracey Sep 2013 A1
20130246218 Gopalan Sep 2013 A1
20130246258 Dessert Sep 2013 A1
20130246280 Kirsch Sep 2013 A1
20130248591 Look et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130268431 Mohsenzadeh Oct 2013 A1
20130290173 Nemeroff Oct 2013 A1
20130290522 Behm, Jr. Oct 2013 A1
20130291018 Billings et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130317835 Mathew Nov 2013 A1
20130317950 Abraham et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130332354 Rhee Dec 2013 A1
20130332385 Kilroy et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130339253 Sincai Dec 2013 A1
20130346223 Prabhu et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140006205 Berry Jan 2014 A1
20140012754 Hanson et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032297 Germann Jan 2014 A1
20140052617 Chawla Feb 2014 A1
20140057667 Blankenship et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058861 Argue et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140067557 van Niekerk Mar 2014 A1
20140074569 Francis Mar 2014 A1
20140074655 Lim et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140074658 Sanchez Mar 2014 A1
20140074691 Bank Mar 2014 A1
20140074716 Ni Mar 2014 A1
20140081783 Paranjape Mar 2014 A1
20140081853 Sanchez et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140081854 Sanchez et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140084059 Sierchio et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140089073 Jacobs Mar 2014 A1
20140089078 Dessert Mar 2014 A1
20140096179 Ben-Shalom et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140099888 Flanagan et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140100931 Sanchez Apr 2014 A1
20140100973 Brown Apr 2014 A1
20140101737 Rhee Apr 2014 A1
20140108245 Drummond et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140114775 Cloin Apr 2014 A1
20140114781 Watanabe Apr 2014 A1
20140122345 Argue et al. May 2014 A1
20140129357 Goodwin May 2014 A1
20140129942 Rathod May 2014 A1
20140136318 Alberth, Jr. et al. May 2014 A1
20140136349 Dave May 2014 A1
20140149282 Philliou et al. May 2014 A1
20140156508 Argue Jun 2014 A1
20140156517 Argue Jun 2014 A1
20140164234 Coffman Jun 2014 A1
20140180805 Argue et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140184505 Fullerton et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140201067 Lai Jul 2014 A1
20140207669 Rosenberg Jul 2014 A1
20140214567 Llach et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140214652 Zheng Jul 2014 A1
20140249947 Hicks et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140250002 Isaacson Sep 2014 A1
20140254820 Gardenfors et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257958 Andrews Sep 2014 A1
20140278589 Rados et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140279098 Ham Sep 2014 A1
20140372300 Blythe Dec 2014 A1
20150012426 Purves Jan 2015 A1
20150025983 Cicerchi Jan 2015 A1
20150032567 Bhatia Jan 2015 A1
20150058146 Gaddam et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066765 Banks Mar 2015 A1
20150073907 Purves Mar 2015 A1
20150095228 Su Apr 2015 A1
20150100481 Ghosh Apr 2015 A1
20150120418 Cervenka Apr 2015 A1
20150127553 Sundaram et al. May 2015 A1
20150134513 Olson et al. May 2015 A1
20150134528 Fineman May 2015 A1
20150178755 Barroso Jun 2015 A1
20150194023 Brackenridge Jul 2015 A1
20160086166 Pomeroy et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160232527 Patterson Aug 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2 930 186 May 2015 CA
10-2006-0103089 Sep 2006 KR
2015061005 Apr 2015 WO
2015069389 May 2015 WO
2015100378 Jul 2015 WO
2015179316 Nov 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (166)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,076 of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Oct. 13, 2014
U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,361 of White, M.W., et al., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Nov. 18, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,490 of Moring, D., et al., filed Jan. 21, 2014.
International search report and written opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/058398 dated Dec. 24, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,895 of Aaron, P., et al., filed Dec. 31, 2013.
International search report and written opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/058447 dated Jan. 15, 2015.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,562 of Chin, H.C.A., et al., filed Mar. 15, 2013.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 20, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/513,076 of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Oct. 13, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256 of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
International search report and written opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/072269 dated Mar. 31, 2015.
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 9, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,338 of Aaron, P., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,655 of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Apr. 21, 2015.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2015, U.S. Appl. No. 14/184,503 of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Feb. 19, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 2, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,800, of Thome, J.P., et al., filed Mar. 13, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,361, of White, M.W., et al., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 24, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,655, of Spindel, N., et al., filed Feb. 18, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,895, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Dec. 31, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/031423 dated Aug. 13, 2015.
Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,490 of Morig, D., et al., filed Jan. 21, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256 of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 29, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,562 of Chin, H.C.A. et al., filed Mar. 15, 2013.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 1, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,842 of Borovsky, A. et al., filed Feb. 4, 2014.
Restriction Requirement dated Apr. 28, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256 of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,338 of Aaron, P. et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,490 of Morig, D., et al., filed Jan. 21, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,842 of Borovsky, A. et al., filed Feb. 4, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,350 of Morgan, T.B. et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/837,562 of Chin, H.C.A. et al., filed Mar. 15, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/088,113 of Maxwell, D.W. et al., filed Nov. 22, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/088,141 of Maxwell, D., filed Nov. 22, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,895 of Aaron, P., filed Dec. 31, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,490 of Morig, D., et al., filed Jan. 21, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256 of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/168,274 of Odawa, A. et al., filed Jan. 30, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,842 of Borovsky, A. et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,655 of Spindel, N., filed Feb. 18, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/184,503 of Borovsky, A., filed Feb. 19, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,869 of Lamba, K. et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,880 of Aaron, P. et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,800 of Thome, J.P. et al., filed Mar. 13, 2014.
“Another eBay Band-Aid Fails to Fix the New Pricing Structure Flaws,” posted on Oct. 18, 2008, Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://thebrewsnews.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/another-ebay-band-aid-fails-to-fix-the-new-pricing-structure-flaws/, pp. 1-5.
“Online Shopping,” dated Nov. 2, 2014, Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_shopping, on Nov. 10, 2014, pp. 1-12.
Goode, L., “Paying With Square's New Mobile-Payments App,” All Things D, dated Apr. 30, 2012, Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://allthingsd.com/20120430/paying-with-squares-new-mobile-payments-app/, on Nov. 7, 2014, pp. 1-3.
Myres, L., “What is Multi-Factor Authentication, and How Will It Change in the Future?,” Intego, dated Aug. 17, 2012, Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://www.intego.com/mac-security-blog/what-is-multi-factor-authentication-and-how-will-it-change-in-the-future/, on Nov. 11, 2014, pp. 1-4.
Wallen, J., “Five Top Apps for Managing Inventory,” Tech Republic, dated Aug. 15, 2012, Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/five-apps/five-top-apps-for-managing-inventory/, on Nov. 10, 2014, pp. 1-7.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,080, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,658, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,704, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Mar. 5, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,638, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,658, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/730,860, of Sasmaz, Y., et al., filed Jun. 4, 2015.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,638, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 12, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,869, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 20, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,080, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 26, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,338, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 27, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,704, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Mar. 5, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 11, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,655, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Apr. 21, 2015.
Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 19, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,658, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,350, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,361, of White, M.W., et al., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/088,113, of Maxwell, D.W., et al., filed Nov. 22, 2013.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,800, of Thome, J.P., et al., filed Mar. 13, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/088,141, of Maxwell, D.W., et al., filed Nov. 22, 2013.
Advisory Action dated Dec. 22, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,895, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Dec. 31, 2013.
Final Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/184,503, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Feb. 19, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 13, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,658, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,638, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Patent Application No. 2014347192, dated Dec. 15, 2016.
Shalmanese, “The Straight Dope Message Board,” message dated Oct. 5, 2013, Retrieved from the Internet URL: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=703989%BB, on Jul. 18, 2016, pp. 1-10.
Final Office Action dated May 20, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,658, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/088,113, of Maxwell, D.W., et al., filed Nov. 22, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,800, of Thome, J.P., et al., filed Mar. 13, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/088,141, of Maxwell, D.W., et al., filed Nov. 22, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/184,503, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Feb. 19, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,658, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,490, of Moring, D., et al., filed Jan. 21, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,869, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,638, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,338, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 13, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,655, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Apr. 21, 2015.
Advisory Action dated Sep. 21, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,658, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,880, of Aaron, P., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,655, of Spindel, N., et al., filed Feb. 18, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Sep. 29, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,658, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,080, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Advisory Action dated Oct. 11, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,869, of Lamba, K, et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,895, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Dec. 31, 2013.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,490, of Moring, D., et al., filed Jan. 21, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,338, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/168,274, of Odawa, A.W., et al., filed Jan. 30, 2014.
Examiner Requisition for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,930,186, dated Jan. 30, 2017.
Notice of Acceptance for Australian Patent Application No. 2014347192, dated Feb. 16, 2017.
Advisory Action dated Feb. 24, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,361, of White, M.W., et al., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 27, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,658, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 2, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,080, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,880, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Mar. 9, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/184,503, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Feb. 19, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,869, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,658, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
“Bluetooth Accessory Design Guidelines for Apple Products,” Apple Inc., dated Sep. 18, 2013, Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/BluetoothDesignGuidelines.pdf, pp. 1-40.
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,632, of Quigley, O.S.C., et al., filed Apr. 3, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,632, of Quigley, O.S.C., et al., filed Apr. 3, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 3, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/244,632, of Quigley, O.S.C., et al., filed Apr. 3, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,342, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,342, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,895, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Dec. 31, 2013.
Final Office Action dated May 19, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/168,274, of Odawa, A.W., et al., filed Jan. 30, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Jun. 9, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,342, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,869, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 6, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/184,503, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Feb. 19, 2014.
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 14855987.5, dated May 10, 2017.
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 3, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,361, of White, M.W., et al., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Chiraag, “A payment Card that Changes Magnetic Stripe via Smartphone,” published Nov. 12, 2013, Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://letstalkpayments.com/card-changes-magnetic-stripe-via-smartphone/, on Jan. 3, 2018, pp. 1-6.
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,337, of Wolter, J.A., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 9, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,895, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Dec. 31, 2013.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,869, of Lamba, K., et al.al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,337, of Wolter, J.A., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 27, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256, of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 2, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,379, of Lewis, J., et al., filed May 6, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256, of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,379, of Lewis, J., et al., filed May 6, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,379, of Lewis, J., et al., filed May 6, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,379, of Lewis, J., et al., filed May 6, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Dec. 29, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,379, of Lewis, J., et al., filed May 6, 2014.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 18, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,379, of Lewis, J., et al., filed May 6, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256, of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,337, of Wolter, J.A., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256, of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Oct. 4, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256, of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2018, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,433, of Rezayee, A., filed Feb. 20, 2018.
Final Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,337, of Wolter, J.A., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Apr. 25, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,337, of Wolter, J.A., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Final Office Action dated May 2, 2019, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/900,433, of Rezayee, A., filed Feb. 20, 2018.
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2019, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/830,059, of Andrew Borovsky., et al., filed Dec. 4, 2017.
“Tracking Inventory,” PayPal, dated Jan. 4, 2010, Retrieved from the Internet URL: https://www.paypal-community.com/t5/How-to-use-PayPal-Archive/Tracking-inventory/td-p/19392, pp. 1-3.
Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,080, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 18, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,704, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Mar. 5, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/184,503, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Feb. 19, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,880, of Aaron, P., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,338, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,361, of White, M.W., et al., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,658, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,658, of Aaron, P., et al. filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256, of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,655, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Apr. 21, 2015.
Final Rejection dated Oct. 21, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/329,638, of Aaron, P., et al. filed Jul. 11, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,655, of Spindel, N., et al., filed Feb. 18, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Nov. 24, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,080, of Morgan, T.B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Advisory Action dated Dec. 4, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/184,503, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Feb. 19, 2014.
“Merchantindustry.com—Best Merchant Services,” Retrieved from internet URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20121020212419/http://www.merchantindustry.com/, on Dec. 30, 2015, pp. 1-7.
Advisory Action dated Dec. 30, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,655, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Apr. 21, 2015.
Final Office Action dated Dec. 31, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,800, of Thome, J. P., et al., filed Mar. 13, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Dec. 31, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,338, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2014.
Advisory Action dated Jan. 21, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,361, of White, M. W., et al., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,869, of Lamba, K., et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,080, of Morgan, T, B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 29, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/088,141, of Maxwell, D. W., et al., filed Nov. 22, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/692,655, of Borovsky, A., et al., filed Apr. 21, 2015.
Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 16, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/088,113, of Maxwell, D. W., et al., filed Nov. 22, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 24, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/145,895, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Dec. 31, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,361, of White, M. W., et al., filed Oct. 28, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,256, of Aaron, P., filed Jan. 27, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/182,655, of Spindel, N., et al., filed Feb. 18, 2014.
Final Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/189,880, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Feb. 25, 2014.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 3, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,350, of Morgan, T. B., et al., filed Mar. 14, 2013.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 9, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,338, of Aaron, P., et al., filed Mar. 25, 2013.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61921373 Dec 2013 US