The subject matter of this patent application relates to computer software architecture, and, more particularly, to the architecture of application software for embedded support.
Enterprise software systems are generally large and complex. Such systems can require many different components, distributed across many different hardware platforms, possibly in several different geographical locations. Thus, the architecture of a large software application, i.e., what its components are and how they fit together, is an important aspect of its design for a successful implementation.
This specification presents a software architecture design for a software application implementing embedded support.
In its various aspects, the subject matter described in the specification can be implemented as methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer program products, for implementing a software architecture design for a software application implementing embedded support. The software application is structured as multiple process components interacting with each other through service interfaces, and multiple service operations, each being implemented for a respective process component. The process components include a Support Request Processing process component and a Software Problem Reporting process component.
In its various aspects, the subject matter can further be implemented as methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer program products, implementing a software architecture design for a software application that is adapted to interact with external software systems through the service operations described in reference to external process components, or a subcombination of them.
The subject matter described in this specification can be implemented to realize one or more of the following advantages. Effective use is made of process components as units of software reuse, to provide a design that can be implemented reliably in a cost effective way. Effective use is made of deployment units, each of which is deployable on a separate computer hardware platform independent of every other deployment unit, to provide a scalable design. Service interfaces of the process components define a pair-wise interaction between pairs of process components that are in different deployment units in a scalable way.
Details of one or more implementations of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and in the description below. Further features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
As shown in
The Customer Relationship Management deployment unit 102 includes a Support Request Processing process component 104 that handles a request reflecting the initial inquiry to clarify and solve an incident during the operations of an IT system, sent by an end user of the system or the system itself to the service processing team. The Support Request can document the incident, the solution process, and the solutions found. It can contain information on the user, the system, and on the nature and context of the incident. Additionally, the Support Request may contain a description of the symptom and a classification of the incident, the underlying problem, and/or the reason, to name a few examples.
The foundation layer, described below, includes a Software Problem Reporting process component 106 that can be used for collecting context data in an IT solution, summarizing the data in a software problem report, and sending the report to the appropriate service desk. Software Problem Reporting functionality can be deployed on more than one decentralized system and information can be forwarded to a central service desk.
A number of external process components, described below, will be used to describe the architectural design. These include a Service Request Processing at Requester process component 108 and a Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110. The Service Request Processing at Requester process component 108 can handle the logging and resolving of service requests concerning customer issues at an external customer site. The Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 can handle the logging and resolving of service requests concerning customer issues at an external provider site.
Not explicitly represented in the figures is a foundation layer that contains all fundamental entities that are used in multiple deployment units 226. These entities can be process components, business objects and reuse service components. A reuse service component is a piece of software that is reused in different transactions. A reuse service component is used by its defined interfaces, which can be, e.g., local APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) or service interfaces.
A process component of an external system is drawn as a dashed-line process component 228. Such a process component 228 represents the external system in describing interactions with the external system; however, the process component 228 need not represent more of the external system than is needed to produce and receive messages as required by the process component that interacts with the external system.
The connector icon 230 is used to simplify the drawing of interactions between process components 204. Interactions between process component pairs 204 involving their respective business objects 202, process agents (at 208, 210, 212, and 214), operations 206, interfaces 216, and messages (at 218 and 22) are described as process component interactions, which determine the interactions of a pair of process components across a deployment unit boundary, i.e., from one deployment unit 226 to another deployment unit 226. Interactions between process components 204 are indicated in
The architectural design is a specification of a computer software application, and elements of the architectural design can be implemented to realize a software application that implements the end-to-end process mentioned earlier. The elements of the architecture are at times described in this specification as being contained or included in other elements; for example, a process component 204 is described as being contained in a deployment unit 226. It should be understood, however, that such operational inclusion can be realized in a variety of ways and is not limited to a physical inclusion of the entirety of one element in another.
The architectural elements include the business object 202. A business object 202 is a representation of a type of a uniquely identifiable business entity (an object instance) described by a structural model. Processes operate on business objects. This example business object represents a specific view on some well-defined business content. A business object represents content, which a typical business user would expect and understand with little explanation. Business objects are further categorized as business process objects and master data objects. A master data object is an object that encapsulates master data (i.e., data that is valid for a period of time). A business process object, which is the kind of business object generally found in a process component 204, is an object that encapsulates transactional data (i.e., data that is valid for a point in time). The term business object will be used generically to refer to a business process object and a master data object, unless the context requires otherwise. Properly implemented, business objects 202 are implemented free of redundancies.
The architectural elements also include the process component 204. A process component 204 is a software package that realizes a business process and generally exposes its functionality as services. The functionality includes the ability to perform all or parts of particular kinds of business transactions. A process component 204 contains one or more semantically related business objects 202. Any business object belongs to no more than one process component. Process components can be categorized as a standard process component, a process component at a business partner, a third party process component, or a user centric process component. The standard process component (named simply process component) is a software package that realizes a business process and exposes its functionality as services. The process component at a business partner is a placeholder for a process component (or other technology that performs the essential functions of the process component) used at a business partner. The third party process component is a process component (or other technology that performs the essential functions of the process component) provided by a third party. The user centric process component is a process component containing user interface parts.
Process components 204 are modular and context-independent. That they are context-independent means that a process component 204 is not specific to any specific application and is reusable. The process component 204 is often the smallest (most granular) element of reuse in the architecture.
The architectural elements also include the operation 206. An operation 206 belongs to exactly one process component 204. A process component 204 generally is able to perform multiple operations 206. Operations 206 can be synchronous or asynchronous, corresponding to synchronous or asynchronous process agents (e.g. at 208, 210, 212, and 214), which will be described below. Operation 206 may be the smallest, separately-callable function, described by a set of data types used as input, output, and fault parameters serving as a signature.
The architectural elements also include the service interface 216, referred to simply as the interface. An interface 216 is a named group of operations 206. Interface 216 typically specifies inbound service interface functionality or outbound service interface functionality. Each operation 206 belongs to exactly one interface 216. An interface 216 belongs to exactly one process component 204. A process component 204 might contain multiple interfaces 216. In some implementations, an interface contains only inbound or outbound operations, but not a mixture of both. One interface can contain both synchronous and asynchronous operations. All operations of the same type (either inbound or outbound) which belong to the same message choreography will belong to the same interface. Thus, generally, all outbound operations 206 directed to the same other process component 204 are in one interface 216.
The architectural elements also include the message 218. Operations 206 transmit and receive messages 218. Any convenient messaging infrastructure can be used. A message is information conveyed from one process component instance to another, with the expectation that activity will ensue. An operation can use multiple message types for inbound, outbound, or error messages. When two process components are in different deployment units, invocation of an operation of one process component by the other process component is accomplished by an operation on the other process component sending a message to the first process component. In some implementations, the message is a form based message 220 that can be translated into a recognized format for an external process component 228. The form message type 220 is a message type used for documents structured in forms. The form message type 220 can be used for printing, faxing, emailing, or other events using documents structured in forms. In some implementations, the form message type 220 provides an extended signature relative to the normal message type. For example, the form message type 220 can include text information in addition to identification information to improve human reading.
The architectural elements also include the process agent (e.g. at 208, 210, 212, and 214). Process agents do business processing that involves the sending or receiving of messages 218. Each operation 206 will generally have at least one associated process agent. The process agent can be associated with one or more operations 206. Process agents (at 208, 210, 212, and 214) can be either inbound or outbound, and either synchronous or asynchronous.
Asynchronous outbound process agents 208 are called after a business object 202 changes, e.g., after a create, update, or delete of a business object instance. Synchronous outbound process agents 210 are generally triggered directly by a business object 202.
An outbound process agent (208 and 210) will generally perform some processing of the data of the business object instance whose change triggered the event. An outbound agent triggers subsequent business process steps by sending messages using well-defined outbound services to another process component, which generally will be in another deployment unit, or to an external system. An outbound process agent is linked to the one business object that triggers the agent, but it is sent not to another business object but rather to another process component. Thus, the outbound process agent can be implemented without knowledge of the exact business object design of the recipient process component.
Inbound process agents (212 and 214) are called after a message has been received. Inbound process agents are used for the inbound part of a message-based communication. An inbound process agent starts the execution of the business process step requested in a message by creating or updating one or multiple business object instances. An inbound process agent is not the agent of a business object but of its process component. An inbound process agent can act on multiple business objects in a process component.
Synchronous agents (210 and 212) are used when a process component requires a more or less immediate response from another process component, and is waiting for that response to continue its work.
Operations and process components are described in this specification in terms of process agents. However, in alternative implementations, process components and operations can be implemented without use of agents by using other conventional techniques to perform the functions described in this specification.
The architectural elements also include the communication channel template. The communication channel template is a modeling entity that represents a set of technical settings used for communication. The technical settings can include details for inbound or outbound processing of a message. The details can be defined in the communication channel template. In particular, the communication channel template defines an adapter type, a transport protocol, and a message protocol. In some implementations, various other parameters may be defined based on a selected adapter type. For example, the communication channel template can define a security level, conversion parameters, default exchange infrastructure parameters, processing parameters, download URI parameters, and specific message properties.
The communication channel template 224 can interact with internal or external process components (at 204 and 228). To interact with an internal process component, the communication channel template is received and uploaded to be used with an operation and interface pair. To interact with an external process component, the communication channel template is received and uploaded to be used with an external entity, such as an external bank, business partner, or supplier.
The architectural elements also include the deployment unit 226. A deployment unit 226 includes one or more process components 204 that are deployed together on a single computer system platform. Conversely, separate deployment units can be deployed on separate physical computing systems. For this reason, a boundary of a deployment unit 226 defines the limits of an application-defined transaction, i.e., a set of actions that have the ACID properties of atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability. To make use of database manager facilities, the architecture requires that all operations of such a transaction be performed on one physical database; as a consequence, the processes of such a transaction must be performed by the process components 204 of one instance of one deployment unit 226.
The process components 204 of one deployment unit 226 interact with those of another deployment unit 226 using messages 218 passed through one or more data communication networks or other suitable communication channels. Thus, a deployment unit 226 deployed on a platform belonging one business can interact with a deployment unit software entity deployed on a separate platform belonging to a different and unrelated business, allowing for business-to-business communication. More than one instance of a given deployment unit can execute at the same time, on the same computing system or on separate physical computing systems. This arrangement allows the functionality offered by a deployment unit to be scaled to meet demand by creating as many instances as needed.
Since interaction between deployment units 226 is through service operations, a deployment unit can be replaced by other another deployment unit as long as the new deployment unit supports the operations depended upon by other deployment units. Thus, while deployment units can depend on the external interfaces of process components in other deployment units, deployment units are not dependent on process component interaction within other deployment units. Similarly, process components 204 that interact with other process components 204 or external systems only through messages 218, e.g., as sent and received by operations 206, can also be replaced as long as the replacement supports the operations 206 of the original 204.
In contrast to a deployment unit 226, the foundation layer does not define a limit for application-defined transactions. Deployment units 226 communicate directly with entities in the foundation layer, which communication is typically not message based. The foundation layer is active in every system instance on which the application is deployed. Business objects 202 in the foundation layer will generally be master data objects. In addition, the foundation layer will include some business process objects that are used by multiple deployment units 226. Master data objects and business process objects that should be specific to a deployment unit 226 are assigned to their respective deployment unit 226.
Interactions Between Process Components “Software Problem Reporting” and “Service Request Processing at Provider”
As shown in
A Request Service from Software Problem Report to Provider outbound process agent 304 can be used to invoke a Request Service operation 306. The outbound process agent 304 can collect data associated with the Software Problem Report business object 302 and send the data to an external service desk. The Request Service operation 306 can request the creating/changing of a service request document in an external service desk. The Request Service operation 306 is included in an External Requesting Out interface 308. The operation 306 generates a Service Request message 310.
The Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 can receive the Service Request message 310. An operation performed by the Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 can generate a Service Request Confirmation message 312.
The message 312 is received in a Change Software Problem Report Based on Provider Confirmation operation 314. The operation 314 is included in an External Requesting In interface 316. The Change Software Problem Report Based on Provider Confirmation operation 314 uses a Change Software Problem Report Based on Provider Confirmation inbound process agent 318 to update the Software Problem Report business object 302.
The Software Problem Reporting process component 106 sends information to the Service Request Processing at Provider business process 110 using a Process at Tenant Out Web Services Reliable Messaging (WSRM) communication channel template 320. The External Requesting Out interface 308 sends information to the Software Problem Reporting process component 106 using the Process at Tenant Out WSRM communication channel template 320. The communication channel template 320 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party. The Software Problem Reporting process component 106 receives information from the Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 using a Processing at Tenant In WSRM communication channel template 322.
The Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 receives information from the Software Problem Reporting process component 106 using a Processing at Business Partner In Exchange Infrastructure (XI) communication channel template 324. The communication channel template 324 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party. The Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 sends information to the Software Problem Reporting process component 106 using a Processing at Business Partner Out XI communication channel template 326. The communication channel template 326 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party. While XI represents Exchange Infrastructure, any similar or suitable third-party or proprietary tool may be used to perform the functions provided by or described in relation to XI.
Interactions Between Process Components “Software Problem Reporting” and “Support Request Processing”
As shown in
The Software Problem Report business object 302 uses a Request Support from Software Problem Report to Support Request Processing outbound process agent 404 to invoke a Request Support operation 406. The Request Support operation 406 requests the creating/changing of a support request document in a service desk. The Request Support operation 406 is included in a Software Problem Reporting Out interface 408. The operation 406 generates a Service Request message 410.
A Maintain Support Request operation 412 receives the Service Request message 410. The operation 412 maintains a support request based on information from a software problem report. The Maintain Support Request operation 412 is included in a Software Problem Reporting In interface 414.
A Maintain Support Request inbound process agent 416 updates a Support Request business object 418. The Support Request business object 418 handles a request by a user of the system or of the system itself to a service provider (IT Service Desk) to clarify and correct an error in an IT solution. The business object 418 can document the error, the resolution process, and the solutions found.
The Support Request business object 418 uses a Confirm Support Request from Support Request to Software Problem Reporting outbound process agent 420 to invoke a Confirm Support Request operation 422. The Confirm Support Request operation 422 confirms to Software Problem Reporting that a support request document has been processed. The operation 422 is included in a Software Problem Reporting Out interface 424. The Confirm Support Request operation 422 generates a Service Request Confirmation message 426.
The message 426 is received in a Change Software Problem Report operation 428. The Change Software Problem Report operation 428 changes the Software Problem Report, based on a confirmation from a service desk. The operation 428 is included in a Software Problem Reporting In interface 430. The Change Software Problem Report operation 428 uses a Change Software Problem Report Based on Confirmation inbound process agent 432 to update the Software Problem Report business object 302.
Interactions Between Process Components “Service Request Processing at Requester” and “Support Request Processing”
Operations performed by the Service Request Processing at Requester process component 108 can generate a Service Request message 502. A Maintain Support Request operation 504 receives the Service Request message 502. The operation 504 can maintain a support request based on information from a software problem report. The Maintain Support Request operation 504 is included in an External Providing In interface 506.
A Maintain Support Request Based on External Request inbound process agent 508 updates the Support Request business object 418. The Support Request business object 418 handles a request by a user of the system to a service provider (IT Service Desk) to clarify and correct an error in an IT solution.
The Support Request business object 418 uses a Confirm Support Request to External Requester outbound process agent 510 to invoke a Confirm Support Request operation 512. The Confirm Support Request operation 512 confirms the creation/change as well as the processing progress of a Support Request Document to an external service desk. The operation 512 is included in an External Providing Out interface 514. The Confirm Support Request operation 512 generates a Service Request Confirmation message 516. The message 516 can be received by an operation performed by the Service Request Processing at Requester process component 108.
The Support Request Processing process component 104 sends information to the Service Request Processing at Request process component 108 using a Process at Tenant Out Web Services Reliable Messaging (WSRM) communication channel template 524. The External Providing Out interface 514 sends information to the Support Request Processing process component 104 using the Process at Tenant Out WSRM communication channel template 524. The communication channel template 524 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party. The Support Request Processing process component 104 sends information to the Service Request Processing at Requester process component 108 using a Processing at Tenant In WSRM communication channel template 522.
The Service Request Processing at Requester process component 108 receives information from the Support Request Processing process component 104 using a Processing at Business Partner In XI communication channel template 520. The communication channel template 520 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party. The Service Request Processing at Requester process component 108 sends information to the Support Request Processing process component 104 using a Processing at Business Partner Out XI communication channel template 518. The communication channel template 518 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party.
Interactions Between Process Components “Support Request Processing” and “Service Request Processing at Provider”
As shown in
The Support Request business object 418 uses a Request Service from Support Request to Provider outbound process agent 602 to invoke a Request Service operation 604. The Request Service operation 604 requests that a service document be processed in an external system. The Request Service operation 604 is included in an External Requesting Out interface 608. The operation 604 generates a Service Request message 610.
The Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 can receive the Service Request message 610. An operation performed by the Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 can generate a Service Request Confirmation message 612.
The message 612 is received in a Change Support Request Based on Provider Confirmation operation 614. The Change Support Request Based on Provider Confirmation operation 614 updates a support request based on data from the external provider system. The operation 614 is included in an External Requesting In interface 616. The Change Support Request Based on Provider Confirmation operation 614 uses a Change Support Request Based on Provider Confirmation inbound process agent 618 to update the Support Request business object 418.
The Support Request Processing process component 104 sends information to the Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 using a Process at Tenant Out Web Services Reliable Messaging (WSRM) communication channel template 620. The External Providing Out interface 608 sends information to the Support Request Processing process component 104 using the Process at Tenant Out WSRM communication channel template 620. The communication channel template 620 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party. The Support Request Processing process component 104 receives information from the Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 using a Processing at Tenant In WSRM communication channel template 622.
The Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 receives information from the Support Request Processing process component 104 using a Processing at Business Partner In XI communication channel template 624. The communication channel template 624 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party. The Service Request Processing at Provider process component 110 sends information to the Support Request Processing process component 104 using a Processing at Business Partner Out XI communication channel template 626. The communication channel template 626 can define protocols and parameters used for communication with an external party.
The subject matter described in this specification and all of the functional operations described in this specification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structural means disclosed in this specification and structural equivalents thereof, or in combinations of them. The subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more computer programs tangibly embodied in an information carrier, e.g., in a machine-readable storage device or in a propagated signal, for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers. A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data, in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for executing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Information carriers suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
To provide for interaction with a user, the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented on a computer having a display device, e.g. a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.
The subject matter described in this specification can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back-end component (e.g., a data server), a middleware component (e.g., an application server), or a front-end component (e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the subject matter described herein), or any combination of such back-end, middleware, and front-end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples of communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a wide area network (“WAN”), e.g., the Internet.
The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as an exemplification of preferred embodiments of the invention. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment may also be provided in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
The subject matter has been described in terms of particular variations, but other variations can be implemented and are within the scope of the following claims. For example, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. As one example, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Other variations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4947321 | Spence et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5361198 | Harmon et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5488713 | Norton et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5535322 | Hecht | Jul 1996 | A |
5550734 | Tarter et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560005 | Hoover et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566097 | Myers et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572727 | Larsson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577261 | Harinarayan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586312 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590277 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5632022 | Warran et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634127 | Cloud et al. | May 1997 | A |
5680619 | Gudmundson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682473 | Carson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5704044 | Tarter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710917 | Musa et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5768119 | Havekost et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5822585 | Noble et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832218 | Gibbs et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5848291 | Milne et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870588 | Rompaey et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881230 | Christensen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893106 | Brobst et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894571 | O'Connor | Apr 1999 | A |
5898872 | Richley | Apr 1999 | A |
5918219 | Isherwood | Jun 1999 | A |
5987247 | Lau | Nov 1999 | A |
5991536 | Brodsky et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
H001830 | Petrimoulx et al. | Jan 2000 | H |
6028997 | Leymann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038393 | Iyengar et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049838 | Miller et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067559 | Allard et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070197 | Cobb et al. | May 2000 | A |
6112024 | Almond et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151582 | Huang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167563 | Fontana et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167564 | Fontana et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6177932 | Galdes et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182133 | Horvitz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192390 | Berger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195676 | Spix et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202044 | Tzori | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208345 | Sheard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237136 | Sadahiro | May 2001 | B1 |
6272672 | Conway | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311170 | Embrey | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338097 | Krenzke et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6424991 | Gish | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434740 | Monday et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442748 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445782 | Elfe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446045 | Stone et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446092 | Sutter | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493716 | Azagury et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6571220 | Ogino et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6594535 | Costanza | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601234 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609100 | Smith et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640238 | Bowman-Amuah | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6671673 | Baseman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678882 | Hurley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687734 | Sellink et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6691151 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721783 | Blossman et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738964 | Zink et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6747679 | Finch et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6750885 | Finch et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757837 | Platt et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6764009 | Melick et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6772216 | Ankireddipally et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782536 | Moore et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789252 | Burke et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6845499 | Srivastava et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847854 | Discenzo | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859931 | Cheyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6889197 | Lidow | May 2005 | B2 |
6889375 | Chan et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6895438 | Ulrich | May 2005 | B1 |
6898783 | Gupta et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904399 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907395 | Hunt et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6954736 | Menninger et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6985939 | Fletcher et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990466 | Hu | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7003474 | Lidow | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7031998 | Archbold | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7043448 | Campbell | May 2006 | B2 |
7047518 | Little et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050056 | Meyringer | May 2006 | B2 |
7050873 | Discenzo | May 2006 | B1 |
7055136 | Dzoba et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058587 | Horne | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7069536 | Yaung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072855 | Godlewski et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076766 | Wirts et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103873 | Tanner et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117447 | Cobb et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120597 | Knudtzon et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120896 | Budhiraja et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131069 | Rush et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7149887 | Morrison et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155403 | Cirulli et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155409 | Stroh | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7181694 | Reiss et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184964 | Wang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194431 | Land et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7197740 | Beringer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200569 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206768 | deGroeve et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7213232 | Knowles | May 2007 | B1 |
7216091 | Blandina et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7219107 | Beringer | May 2007 | B2 |
7222786 | Renz et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225240 | Fox et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7249044 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257254 | Tunney | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7283973 | Loghmani et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7293254 | Bloesch et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299970 | Ching | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315830 | Wirtz et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7322024 | Carlson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324966 | Scheer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7353180 | Silverstone et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356492 | Hazi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367011 | Ramsey et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370315 | Lovell et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376601 | Aldridge | May 2008 | B1 |
7376604 | Butcher | May 2008 | B1 |
7376632 | Sadek et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7383201 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386833 | Granny et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7406716 | Kanamori et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412626 | Wood et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415697 | Houlding | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7418409 | Goel | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7418424 | Martin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7424701 | Kendall et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433979 | Need | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448022 | Ram et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7451432 | Shukla et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460654 | Jenkins et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7461030 | Hibler et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469233 | Shooks et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496920 | Bandhole et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7516088 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523054 | Tyson-Quah | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529699 | Fuse et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7530065 | Ciudad et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7536325 | Randell et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7536354 | deGroeve et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7546520 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546575 | Dillman et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7565640 | Shukla et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574694 | Mangan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577953 | Verego et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7610575 | Sproule | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7624338 | Opitz et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624371 | Kulkarni et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631291 | Shukla et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640195 | Von Zimmermann et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640291 | Maturana et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644065 | Wu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7644390 | Khodabandehloo et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657406 | Tolone et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7657445 | Goux | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7665083 | Demant et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668761 | Jenkins et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672888 | Allin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681176 | Wills et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693586 | Dumas et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703073 | Illowsky et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716316 | Nichols et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739160 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7742985 | Digrigoli et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7747980 | Illowsky et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761288 | Parnell et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765156 | Staniar et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7765521 | Bryant | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778720 | Alse | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788145 | Wadawadigi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788319 | Schmidt | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7793256 | Charisius et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7793258 | Sundararajan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797698 | Diament et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814142 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822682 | Arnold et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7827154 | Spertus et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7835971 | Stockton et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7886041 | Outhred et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895568 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7904350 | Ayala et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912755 | Perry et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917889 | Devarakonda et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925985 | Moore | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7954091 | Li et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962436 | Brelage et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7975179 | Chandrasekaran | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7975265 | Schnoebelen et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987087 | Rich | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8001519 | Conallen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010938 | Elaasar | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015541 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8051332 | Zakonov et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065315 | Rapp et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8091065 | Mir et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8112738 | Pohl et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8112747 | Haeberle et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8132166 | DeHaan | Mar 2012 | B2 |
20010052108 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020026394 | Savage et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042756 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049622 | Lettich et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020073114 | Nicastro et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078046 | Uluakar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082892 | Raffel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103660 | Cramon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020104071 | Charisius et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107826 | Ramachandran et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120553 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133368 | Strutt et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138281 | Cirulli et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138358 | Scheer | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143598 | Scheer | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156695 | Edwards | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161907 | Moon | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184111 | Swanson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188486 | Gil et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198798 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198828 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009754 | Rowley et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030058277 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069774 | Hoffman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074271 | Viswanath et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074360 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083762 | Farrah et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084127 | Budhiraja et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130860 | Datta et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030182206 | Hendrix et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212602 | Schaller | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233290 | Yang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015367 | Nicastro et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034578 | Oney et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054564 | Fonseca et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093268 | Ramchandani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093381 | Hodges et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111304 | Meka et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111639 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128180 | Abel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133481 | Schwarze et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153359 | Ho et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158506 | Wille | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172510 | Nagashima et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181470 | Grounds | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181538 | Lo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040205011 | Northington et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236639 | Candadai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236687 | Tyson-Quah | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243489 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254866 | Crumbach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255152 | Kanamori et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010501 | Ward | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033588 | Ruiz et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044015 | Bracken et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060235 | Byrne | Mar 2005 | A2 |
20050060408 | McIntyre et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065828 | Kroswek et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050108680 | Cheng et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113092 | Coppinger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114829 | Robin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125310 | Hazi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144125 | Erbey et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144226 | Purewal | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156500 | Birecki et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160104 | Meera et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165784 | Gomez et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177435 | Lidow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203760 | Gottumukkala et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203813 | Welter et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209732 | Audimoolam et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209943 | Ballow et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216325 | Ziad et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216507 | Wright | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222896 | Rhyne et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234787 | Wallmeier et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235020 | Gabelmann et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240592 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246250 | Murray | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246482 | Gabelmann et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256775 | Schapler et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256882 | Able et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257125 | Roesner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257197 | Herter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262192 | Mamou et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262453 | Massasso | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050284934 | Ernesti et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288987 | Sattler et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289020 | Bruns et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289079 | Krishan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004802 | Phillips et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060053063 | Nagar | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064344 | Lidow | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074704 | Shukla et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074731 | Green et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080338 | Seubert et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085243 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085294 | Boerner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085336 | Seubert et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089886 | Wong | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095439 | Buchmann et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129978 | Abrari et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143029 | Akbay et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149574 | Bradley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060206352 | Pulianda | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248504 | Hughes | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274720 | Adams et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287939 | Harel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288350 | Grigorovitch et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011650 | Hage et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022410 | Ban et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050308 | Latvala et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075916 | Bump et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094098 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094261 | Phelan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129964 | Helmolt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129984 | von Helmolt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129985 | Helmolt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143164 | Kaila et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150332 | Grichnik et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150387 | Seubert et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150855 | Jeong | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156428 | Brecht-Tillinger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156430 | Kaetker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156474 | Scherberger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156475 | Berger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156476 | Koegler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156482 | Bagheri | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156489 | Berger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156493 | Tebbe et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156499 | Berger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156500 | Merkel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156538 | Peter et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156550 | Der Emde et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156731 | Ben-Zeev | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162893 | Kaetker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070164849 | Haeberle et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168303 | Kaetker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174068 | Alfandary et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174145 | Hetzer et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174811 | Kaetker et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070186209 | Kaetker et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197877 | Decorte et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198391 | Dreyer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214065 | Kahlon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220046 | Moosmann et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220143 | Lund et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233539 | Suenderhauf et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233541 | Schorr et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233545 | Cala et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233574 | Koegler et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233575 | Berger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233581 | Peter | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233598 | Der Emde et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234282 | Prigge et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239508 | Fazal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239569 | Lucas et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265860 | Herrmann et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265862 | Freund et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004929 | Raffel et al. | Jan 2008 | A9 |
20080017722 | Snyder et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027831 | Gerhardt | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080059387 | Vaidhyanathan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065437 | Dybvig | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120129 | Seubert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147507 | Langhammer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162382 | Clayton et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208707 | Erbey et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215354 | Halverson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228536 | Suenbuel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262860 | Schneider et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263152 | Daniels et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288304 | Nores et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294485 | Takeuchi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300959 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037287 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090037492 | Baitalmal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063112 | Hader et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090171713 | Schwarz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171716 | Suenderhauf et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171733 | Bobak et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171818 | Penning et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171819 | Emde et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172699 | Jungkind et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189743 | Abraham et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192858 | Johnson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248487 | Santoso et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090327106 | Bartelt et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100070324 | Bock et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070329 | Engler et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070331 | Koegler et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070336 | Koegler et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070391 | Storr et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070395 | Elkeles et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070555 | Duparc et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082407 | Akkiraju et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100464 | Ellis et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131916 | Prigge | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138257 | Wocher et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138269 | Cirpus et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153150 | Prigge et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153239 | Liebich et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153432 | Pfeifer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161365 | Lokowandt et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110252395 | Charisius et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120066218 | Rapp et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0023874 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 2004083984 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005114381 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Data mining navy flight ; Meseroll Robert, IEEE Autotestcom 2007, 476-81, Sep. 2007. |
Design and Analysis of a rule based knowledge, Trappey Amy;lnt Journal of Manufacturing Tech; 35,3-4:385-93, Dec. 2007. |
Data mining navy flight; Meseroll Robert, IEEE Autotestcom 2007, 476-81, Sep. 2007. |
Design and Analysis of a rule based knowledge, Trappey Amy;Int Journal of Manufacturing Tech; 35,3-4:385-93, Dec. 2007. |
Aleksy, M. et al.; “Interoperability of Java-Based Applications and SAP's Business Framework State of the Art and Desirable Developments”; Proceedings of the International Symposium on Edinburgh, UK; Sep. 1999; IEEE Computer Soc.; pp. 190-200. |
Anon,; “Sequenst Corp Bell Atlantic: Bell Atlantic Selects Sequent for Video-on-Demand Program; Sequent Moves to Sieze Opportunity in New Market”; Business Wire; Dec. 6, 1994. |
Anon.; “State of the Art Reports™ 13,000 MAS 90® for Windows® Shipments in First Nine Months of Availability”; PR Newswire; Apr. 28, 1997. |
Arch-int, S. et al.; “Development of Industrial Information Systems on the Web Using Busienss Components”; Computers in Industry; vol. 60; 2003; pp. 231-250. |
Astudillo, H.; “How Conceptual System Architecture Leads to Business Process”; ACM; 2000; pp. 35-36. |
Avanquest's Bookkeeper 2007 Provides All-in-One Solution for Small Business Accounting and Financial Management; New Version of Popular Software Enables Detailed Report Creation and In-House Payroll Processing; PR Newswire; New York; Oct. 3, 2006. |
Avery, S.; “Buyer's Guide to Software for Purchasing 2000.(Directory)”; Purchasing, vol. 129, No. 1; p. 179; Jul. 13, 2000. |
Beisiegel, M. et al.; “Service Component Architecture: Building Systems Using a Service Oriented Architecture”; Whitepaper [online]; Nov. 2005; pp. 1-31; http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/pub/software/dw/specs/ws-sca/SCA—White—Paper1—09.pdf. |
Cowan, D.D. et al.; “Application Integration: Constructing Composite Applications from Interactive Components”; Software Practice and Experience; vol. 23, No. 3; Mar. 1993; pp. 255-275. |
Deimel, A.; “The SAP R/3 Business Framework”; Software—Concepts & Tools; vol. 19, No. 1; 1998; pp. 29-36. |
Fellner, K.J., et al.; “Classification Framework for Business Components”; System Sciences; Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference; Jan. 2000; pp. 3239-3248. |
Ferguson D.F. et al.; “Service-Oriented Architecture: Programming Model and Product Architecture”; IBM Systems Journal [online]; vol. 44, No. 4; Dec. 1, 2005; pp. 753-780; http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/journal/sj/444/ferguson.pdf. |
Gauthier, P. and OSS-J Architecture Board; “OSS through Java (TM) J2EE Design Guidelines”; [online]; Oct. 31, 2001; http://www.ossj.org/downloads/design—guidelines.shtml. |
Gessford, J.E.; “Object-Oriented System Design”; Emerging Information Technologies for Competitive Advantage and Economic Development; Proceedings of the 1992 Information Resources Management Association International Conference; 1992; pp. 110-118. |
He, J. et al.; “Component-Based Software Engineering: The Need to Link Methods and Their Theories”; Theoretical Aspects of Computer ICTAC 2005; Second International Colloquium Proceedings (Lecture notes in Computer Science vol. 3722); Oct. 2005; pp. 70-95. |
“Hudson's Bay Company Realizes Fast ROI with the Oracle E-Business Suite”; PR Newswire; New York; Jan. 15, 2002; p. 1. |
Kozacynski, W.; “Architecture Framework for Business Components”; Software Reuse 1998 Proceedings; Fifth International Conferences on Victoria, BC, Canada; Jun. 1998; IEEE Comput. Soc; pp. 300-307. |
Kythe, D.K.; “The Promise of Distributed Business Components”; Bell Labs Technical Journal; vol. 75, No. 2; Mar./Apr. 1999; pp. 20-28. |
Linthicum, D.S.; “Chapter 9: RPCs, Messaging, and B2B Application Integration”; B2B Application Integration: E-Business Enable Your Enterprise; 2001; pp. 167-181. |
Nori A.K. et al.; “Composite Applications: Process Based Application Development”; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol. 2444; Aug. 2003; pp. 48-53. |
Pilhofer, F.; “Writing and Using CORBA Components”; Apr. 2002; http://www.fpx.de/MicoCCM/download/mico-ccm.pdf; 17 pages. |
Ravichandran, T.; “Special Issue on Component-Based Software Development”; The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems; 2003; pp. 45-46. |
SAP AG; “Designing Cross Solutions”; SAP XAPPS, [online]; Sep. 2003; pp. 1-2; http://www.sap.com/belux/platform/netweaver/pdf/BWP—CAF.pdf. |
Schmid, H.A.; “Business Entity Components and Buisness Process Components”; Joop; vol. 12, No. 6; Oct. 1999; pp. 6-10, 12-15. |
Sharifi, M. et al.; “CORBA Components Collocation Optimization Enhanced with Local ORB-Like Services Support”; On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (2004): COOPIS, ODA and ODBASE. OTM Confederated Conferences COOPIS, DOA and ODBASE 2004; Proceedings Part II (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3291); 2004; pp. 1143-1154. |
Singh, I. et al.; “Designing Enterprise Applications with the J2EE Platform, Second Edition”; Jun. 15, 2002. |
Stojanovic, Z. et al.; “Modeling and Design of Service-Oriented Architecture”; Systems, Man and Cybernetics; 2004 IEEE International Conference on The Hague, The Netherlands; Oct. 2004; IEEE, vol. 5; pp. 4147-4152. |
Thomas, A.; “Enterprise JavaBeans Server Component Model for Java”; [online]; Dec. 1997; http://www.cs.indiana.edu/classes/b649-gann/ejb-white-paper.pdf. |
Vergil Technology Ltd.; “Vergil Composite Application Builder Suite”; Product Datasheet [online]; 2003; pp. 1-5; http://www.webservicesmall.com.docs/VCAB—datasheet.pdf. |
Woods, D.; “Packaged Composite Applications: A Liberating Force for the User Interface”; Internet Citation [online]; Oct. 2004; 4 pages; http://www.sapdesignguild.org/editions/edition7/print—composite—applications.asp. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012625; Apr. 3, 2007; 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012625; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012614; Mar. 16, 2007; 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2006/012614; Jul. 1, 2008; 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012618; Apr. 3, 2007; 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012618; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012613; May 3, 2007; 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012613; Jul. 1, 2008; 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012624; Mar. 30, 2007; 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012624; Jul. 1, 2008; 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012623; May 7, 2007; 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012623; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012620; Mar. 21, 2007; 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012620; Jul. 1, 2008; 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012619; Apr. 19, 2007; 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012619; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012621; Apr. 19, 2007; 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2006/012621; Jul. 1, 2008; 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2007/002835; Aug. 9, 2007; 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2007/002835; Sep. 30, 2008; 8 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in European Application No. 06841224.6; May 15, 2009; 8 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in European Application No. 06847009.5; May 15, 2009; 10 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in European Application No. 07007130.3; Dec. 5, 2008; 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 07007130.3; Oct. 5, 2007; 6 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,041; Apr. 30, 2009; 26 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,612; May 11, 2009; 24 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,772; Mar. 25, 2009; 12 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,590; Jan. 9, 2009; 23 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288; Jan. 2, 2009; 18 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288; Apr. 15, 2008; 26 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,029; Jul. 21, 2009;28 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,040; Jul. 24, 2009; 35 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,590; Jul. 10, 2009; 32 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,816; Jul. 23, 2006; 41 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,851; Sep. 2, 2009; 32 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,590; Dec. 30, 2009; 31 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,482; Jan. 7, 2010; 19 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,772; Dec. 9, 2009; 14 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,039; Sep. 4, 2009; 36 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,634; Sep. 10, 2009; 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,383; Nov. 12, 2009; 29 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258; Nov. 25, 2009; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,085; Jun. 25, 2009; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288; Aug. 19, 2009; 20 pages. |
“American Software Announces ASP Pricing Model for It's a-Applications Expense Business Solution”; PR Newswire; Mar. 6, 2000; 2 pages. |
Bastani et al.; “Complex Open System Design by Quasi Agents: Process Oriented Modeling in Agent Based Systems”; ACM SIGSOFT; vol. 34, No. 4; 2009; pp. 1-14. |
Bastani et al.; “Process Oriented Abstraction of the Complex Evolvable Systems: Problem Model Construction”; ACM SIGSOFT; vol. 33, No. 3; 2008; pp. 1-13. |
“Cendant Announces Comprehensive Online Travel Booking to Meet President Bush's eTravel Initiative”; PR Newswire; Jul. 9, 2002; 3 pages. |
Chen, M. And Meixell, M.; “Web Services Enabled Procurement in the Extended Enterprise: An Architectural Design and Implementation”; Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 4, No. 4; 2003; pp. 140-155. |
Duc et al.; “Uniform Object Modeling Methodology and Reuse of Real Time System Using UML”; EMSOFT '05; Sep. 19-22, 2005; pp. 44-47. |
Gomaa et al.; “Model Based Software Design and Adaption”; International Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS '07); IEEE; 2007; 10 pages. |
Huang, S. et al.; “Computer-Assisted Supply Chain Configuration Based on Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model”; Computers & Industrial Engineering 48; 2005; pp. 377-394. |
Intuit Canada Ltd.; “Startup Guide—QuickBooks Basic for Windows, QuickBooks Pro for Windows, QuickBooks Premier for Windows”; 2002; 230 pages. |
Lambert et al.; “Supply Chain Metrics”; International Journal of Logistics Management; vol. 12, No. 1; 2001; pp. 1-19. |
Lockamy III, et al.; “Linking SCOR Planning Practices to Supply Chain Performance”; International Journal of Operationgs & Production Management; vol. 24, No. 12; pp. 1192-1218. |
mySAP™ ERP 2005; Downloaded Mar. 24, 2010 from <http://web.archive.org/web/20061104021205/www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/pdf/BWP—mySAP—ERP—2005.pdf>; 60 pages. |
“Oracle Expands E-Commerce Offerings with the Acquisition of E-Travel, Inc.”; PR Newswire; Mar. 9, 1999; 3 pages. |
Ouyang et al.; “From Business Process Models to Process Oriented Software Systems”; ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology; vol. 19, No. 1, Article 2; Aug. 2009; pp. 1-37. |
Rossi et al.; “Designing and Architecturing Process-aware Web Applications with EPML”; SAC '08; Mar. 16-20, 2008; pp. 2409-2414. |
“SAP Delivers Next-generation ERP to Customers”; PR Newswire; New York; Mar. 10, 2005; 7 pages. |
Schultz, G.J.; “Keeping SCOR on Your Supply Chain: Basic Operations Reference Model Updates with the Times”; Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal; Summer 2003; pp. 12-20. |
Stephens, S.; “Supply Chain Council & Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model Overview”; <http://www.supply-chain.org>; Version 5.0a; Aug. 2001; 29 pages. |
Stephens, S.; “Supply Chain Operatives Reference Model Version 5.0: A New Tool to Improve Supply Chain Efficiency and Achieve Best Practice”; Information Systems Frontiers 3:4, 2001; pp. 471-476. |
“Time Management with mySAP™ ERP Human Capital Management”; Downloaded Mar. 24, 2010 from <http://web. archive.org/web/20060105084834/www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/hcm/pdf/HCM—Time—Management.pdf>; 4 pages. |
Vogel et al.; “mySAP ERP for Dummies”; Published on Sep. 30, 2005; Downloaded on Mar. 23, 2001 from <http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/9780764599958> 41 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2007/002841; Aug. 16, 2007; 12 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability under Chapter I issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2007/002841; Sep. 30, 2008; 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,312 on Mar. 30, 2010; 23 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,611 on Mar. 31, 2010; 17 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610 on Mar. 1, 2010; 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610 on Jun. 14, 2010; 6 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,772; Jul. 12, 2010; 18 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,398 on Apr. 2, 2010; 39 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,398 on Jul. 23, 2010; 38 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,383; May 12, 2010; 23 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,382 on Mar. 29, 2010; 28 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,041 on Mar. 19, 2010; 26 pages. |
Advisory Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,041 on Jun. 7, 2010; 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Mar. 29, 2010; 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Jul. 6, 2010; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288; May 20, 2010; 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Mar. 31, 2010; 9 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on May 19, 2010; 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,236 on Mar. 31, 2010; 20 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,039; Apr. 14, 2010; 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,851; May 12, 2010; 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,845; Jul. 15, 2010; 16 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,040; Apr. 29, 2010; 17 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,612; Apr. 1, 2010; 23 pages. |
Advisory Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,612; Jun. 24, 2010; 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Mar. 29, 2010; 17 pages. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Jul. 9, 2010; 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Jul. 26, 2010; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,554 on May 14, 2010; 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 on Jun. 24, 2010; 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,354 on Jun. 25, 2010; 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,865 on Mar. 31, 2010; 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,482; Jul. 13, 2010; 5 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,590; Jun. 21, 2010; 25 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,634; Apr. 2, 2010; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,816; Apr. 15, 2010; 27 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,327 on Apr. 1, 2010; 26 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,085; Mar. 23, 2010; 5 pages. |
Bin et al.; “Component Model Optimization for Distributed Real-Time Embedded Software”; IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics; Oct. 13, 2004; 6 pages. |
Cascallar, Eduardo et al.; “Assessment in the Evaluation of Self-Regulation as a Process”; Educational Psychology Review; vol. 18, No. 3; Sep. 2006; pp. 297-306. |
Cohen; “Optimizer: IBM's Multi-Echelon Inventory System for Managing Service Logistics Interfaces”; vol. 20, No. 1; 1990; pp. 65-82. |
Cohen et al.; “Saturn's Supply-Chain Innovation: High Value in After Sales Service”; Sloan Management Review; vol. 41, No. 4; 2000; pp. 93-101. |
Cool, David W.; “Activity Fund Accounting”; School Business Affairs; vol. 49, No. 6; Jun. 1983; pp. 50-52. |
Cox et al.; “A Formal Model for Component Based Software”; IEEE; Aug. 7, 2002; 8 pages. |
Ferscha et al.; “A Light-Weight Component Model for Peer-to-Peer Applications”; IEEE; Mar. 23, 2004. |
Finin et al.; “KQML as an Agent Communication Language”; retrieved on Jul. 26, 2011; pp. 456-463. <http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=191322>. |
Flissi et al.; “A Component-based Software Infrastructure for Ubiquitous Computing”; IEEE; Jul. 4, 2005. |
Gould; “Integrating the Manufacturing Enterprise”; Automative Design & Production; 119, 1; ABI/INFORM Global; Jan. 2007; 3 pages. |
Jennings et al.; “Autonomous Agents for Business Process Management”; 2000 Applied Artificial Intelligence; retrieved on Jul. 25, 2011; pp. 145-189. <http:.//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.58.624&rep=rep1&1type=pdf>. |
Kalakota et al.; “Readings in Electronic Commerce”; Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.; 1995; ISBN: 0-201-88060-1. |
Orsburn; “Spares Management Handbook”; McGrawHill; 1991; ISBN: 0-8306-7626-0. |
Papazoglou et al; “Service-Oriented Computing Research Road Map”; http://infolab.uvt.nl/pub/papazogloump-2006-96.pdf; Mar. 1, 2006; 29 pages. |
SAP AG; “SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer: User Guide (SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer release 6.0)”; Document version 1.1; 2004; pp. 1-208. |
SAP AG; “Powered by SAP NetWeaver Partner Program—Frequently Asked Questions”; May 2005; 10 pages [online] http://www.lionbridge.com/NR/rdonlyres/4940BE1F/DA46/412E/AB16/F049BD865CA1/0/PBMWFAQ—50070686—en.pdf. |
Strelich, Thomas P. et al.; “Simulation-Based Transformation with the Service Integration/Interoperation Infrastructure”; Technology Review Journal; Fall/Winter 2005; pp. 99-115. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,554 on Sep. 17, 2010; 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,554 on Feb. 22, 2011; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,554 on Jun. 27, 2011; 7 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,550 on Jan. 12, 2011; 29 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,550 on May 11, 2011; 20 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,146 on Sep. 6, 2011; 21 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,634 on Apr. 29, 2011; 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,973 on Dec. 7, 2010; 13 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,973 on May 27, 2011; 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,327 on Nov. 30, 2010; 28 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,327 on Sep. 28, 2011; 31 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/404,147 on Nov. 24, 2010; 27 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/404,147 on Aug. 4, 2011; 26 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,479 on Oct. 27, 2011; 24 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/332,965 on Oct. 11, 2011; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on Feb. 2, 2011; 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. App. No. 12/233,462 on May 18, 2011; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on Sep. 2, 2011; 7 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,289 on Oct. 27, 2011; 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,457 on May 26, 2011; 19 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,483 on Aug. 20, 2010; 10 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,483 on Mar. 4, 2011; 6 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,232 on May 26, 2011; 20 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,590 on Jun. 23, 2011; 16 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,701 on Nov. 8, 2011; 20 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,085; Sep. 13, 2010; 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 on Oct. 20, 2010; 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 on Jan. 31, 2011; 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 on May 16, 2011; 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,382 on Sep. 20, 2010; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,382 on Jan. 6, 2011; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,382 on Jul. 25, 2011; 5 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,312 on Sep. 10, 2010; 23 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,611 on Sep. 16, 2010; 21 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610 on Sep. 23, 2010; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610 on Dec. 22, 2010; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,610 on Mar. 31, 2011; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,398 on Oct. 29, 2010; 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowanced issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,398 on Nov. 15, 2010; 20 pages. |
Notice of Allowanced issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,398 on May 27, 2011; 21 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,383 on May 12, 2010; 23 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,383 on Nov. 12, 2009; 23 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,236 on Oct. 28, 2010; 19 pages. |
Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,236 on Nov. 10, 2011; 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Oct. 15, 2010; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Jan. 20, 2011; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Aug. 5, 2011; 7 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288 on Oct. 17, 2011; 38 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288; Dec. 28, 2010; 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,288; Sep. 24, 2010; 4 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,250 on Oct. 18, 2010; 15 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,250 on Mar. 2, 2011; 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,250 on Jun. 24, 2011; 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Jul. 28, 2010; 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Nov. 16, 2010; 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Jun. 28, 2011; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,252 on Nov. 10, 2011; 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,851 on Sep. 2, 2011; 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,845; Dec. 27, 2010; 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,845; Apr. 8, 2011; 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,040 on Nov. 5, 2010; 33 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,040 on Jul. 26, 2011; 34 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Nov. 15, 2010; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Mar. 3, 2011; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Jul. 20, 2011; 8 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,417 on Apr. 7, 2011; 32 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,417 on Sep. 14, 2011; 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,054 on Sep. 7, 2010; 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/968,054 on Aug. 2, 2011; 5 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,530 on Apr. 29, 2011; 11 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,405 on Apr. 27, 2011; 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,458 on Oct. 12, 2011; 19 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,557 on Sep. 16, 2010; 16 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,489 on Sep. 28, 2011; 7 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,557 on Mar. 4, 2011; 19 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,489 on May 13, 2011; 15 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,393 on Apr. 15, 2011; 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,354 on Oct. 18, 2010; 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,354 on Feb. 1, 2011; 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,354 on Aug. 9, 2011; 13 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,387 on Sep. 8, 2011; 14 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,075 on Aug. 4, 2011; 45 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,865 on Oct. 6, 2010; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,865 on Jun. 24, 2011; 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,890 on Jul. 15, 2011; 7 pages. |
Anonymous; “Mastering Management”; Motor Age, vol. 25, No. 10; Oct. 2006; pp. 1-3. |
Gerin et al.; “Flexible and Executable Hardware/Software Interface Modeling for Multiprocessor SOC Design Using SystemC”; IEEE; 2007; pp. 390-395. |
Hahn; “A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Multi-Agent Systems”; ACM AAMAS; 2008; pp. 233-240. |
Hu; “A Co-Design Modeling Approach for Computer Network Systems”; IEEE; 2007; pp. 685-693. |
“IDe Partners with Journyx to Offer Customers Best-in-Class Time Management Solution”; PR Newswire; Mar. 8, 2005; Business Dateline. |
Kremic, Tibor; “Outsourcing Decision Support: A Survey of Benefits, Risks, and Decision Factor”; Supply Chain Management; V. 11; 2006; pp. 467-482. |
Sarjoughian et al.; “CoSMOs: A Visual Environment for Component Based Modeling, Experimental Design and Simulation”; ACM; 2009; pp. 1-9. |
Schaub, Thomas et al.; “Enterprise Management Application Providing Availability Control Checks on Revenue Budgets”; Aerospace & High Technology, ANTE: Abstracts in New Technologies and Engineering; Metdex, Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts; Date Unknown. p. 1. |
“Trakware Systems Inc. Expands Management Team: Leading To-Order Software Provider Adds Experienced Global VP Sales and Marketing to its World-Class Team”; Canada NewsWire; Apr. 9, 2008. |
Vescovi, Marcos and Hagmann, Christian; “Rules Engine for Enterprise System”; Areospace & High Technology, ANTE: Abstracts in New Technologies and Engineering; Metadex, Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts; Date Unknown; p. 1. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,550 on Jan. 9, 2012; 11 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,146 on Feb. 2, 2012; 21 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/323,634 on Jan. 25, 2012; 5 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,816; Jul. 23, 2009; 41 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,479 on May 7, 2012; 26 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/332,965 on Jun. 11, 2012; 21 pages. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on Dec. 12, 2011; 6 pages |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,462 on Apr. 5, 2012; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,289 on Feb. 15, 2012; 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,457 on Nov. 3, 2011; 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,232 on Nov. 2, 2011; 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,590 on Dec. 28, 2011; 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,701 on Apr. 6, 2012; 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,534 won Dec. 28, 2011; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowanced issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,398 on Oct. 18, 2011; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,259 on Mar. 15, 2012; 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,250 on Dec. 7, 2011; 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,258 on Feb. 3, 2012; 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,851 on Mar. 1, 2012; 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/322,845; Nov. 13, 2011; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026; Jul. 21, 2009; 28 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Nov. 4, 2011; 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,026 on Feb. 23, 2012; 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,520 on Nov. 10, 2011; 22 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,489 on Feb. 6, 2012; 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,393 on Nov. 9, 2011; 9 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/967,387 on Apr. 12, 2012; 13 pages. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/327,737 on Mar. 26, 2012; 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/233,075 on Mar. 22, 2012; 25 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100070289 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |