(1) Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an arrangement for the potential-free measurement of currents according to the preamble of claim 1.
(2) Description of Related Art
Prior art arrangements of this type measure currents by detecting a magnetic differential field, or a magnetic field gradient, respectively, generated by a current in a substantially U-shaped conductor unit the limbs of which may be referred to as primary conductors (WO 00/11482, DE 4300605 C2, U.S. Pat. No. 5,548,208).
The magnetic differential field, or the magnetic field gradient, respectively, penetrates a differential field sensor, or a gradiometer, respectively, which generates a signal voltage corresponding to the magnetic differential field, or the magnetic field gradient, respectively, without being galvanically connected with the primary circuit. Thereby, a measuring system is desired without any elaborate magnetic flow conduction while the influence of magnetic interference fields is nonetheless minimized.
Sensors based on magneto resistive effects such as the anisotropic magneto resistive effect (AMR) or the gigantic magneto resistive effect (GMR) may be used in particular as suitable differential field sensors. Such sensor systems on the basis of the colossal magneto resistive effect (CMR) or of the tunnel magneto resistive effect (TMR) are conceivable as well.
In the case of arrangements for the potential-free measurements of currents of the kind referred to in the beginning, it is the task as mentioned before to reduce a sensibility vis-à-vis external magnetic interference fields which may disturb the detection of the magnetic differential field, or the field gradient, respectively, relevant for the measurement. The external magnetic fields may, inter alia, be caused by eddy currents which, on their part, are induced in adjoining metal parts by the magnetic field of the current to be measured, referred to as primary current. In order to reduce the frequency-depending measuring errors caused thereby, it has already been known in an arrangement of the kind referred to in the beginning to adjust the cross-sectional area and the form as well as the material selection of the primary conductors and their distance from particularly shaped neighboring metal parts, if any, and the magnetic field sensitive measuring devices, particularly sensors, so that the influences of different electro-dynamic effects, particularly of the induction of eddy currents in the neighboring metal parts, largely compensate each other (DE 19819470 A1, particularly
It is the object of the present invention to further reduce, in an arrangement for potential-free measurement of currents of the kind referred to in the beginning, the influence of external interference fields on the detection of the magnetic differential field, or the field gradient, respectively, of two substantially parallel primary conductors in a technically less sophisticated way and to obtain, by the means to be used, an additional technical benefit.
This task is solved by the features referred to in claim 1.
By means of the two metal parts shaped, according to the invention, as shield plates made of highly permeable material at least one of which plates being configured substantially U-shaped in cross-sectional planes, having one pair of limbs each which extend at a right angle in a longitudinal direction to the U-shaped cross-sectional planes wherein the two shield plates are disposed relative to each other such that the at least one limb pair of one of the two shield plates is aligned toward the other of the two shield plates while leaving an air gap each on one of the two limbs and wherein the primary conductors extend in the longitudinal direction of the limb, a very good shielding of the differential field sensor which is disposed, as are the primary conductors, within the space enclosed by the shield plates, is obtained against the external magnetic interference fields. Nonetheless, the magnetic field gradients originating from the primary conductors detected by the differential field sensor are not too much attenuated since the two shield plates do not form a completely closed magnetic circle about the primary conductors. The dimensioning of the shield plates which are formed and disposed according to the features of the claim may be obtained by simple trials or simulation calculations of the field configuration, particularly at the site of the differential field sensors.
As an additional benefit, in this connection, the measuring sensibility, or the measuring range, respectively, of the arrangement for the potential-free measurement of currents can be set, namely by variation of the air gap and/or the dimensions, particularly of the thickness of the shield plates.
In an effective variant of the arrangement of the invention, the two shield plates are shaped as having one pair of limbs each between which one of the webs each is disposed, and these two shield plates are arranged relative to each other in a way so that the two limb pairs of the shield plates are aligned toward each other while leaving one air gap each.
Based on the arrangement according to the invention and the variant thereof, the measuring task can be solved which is to measure a current through a U-shaped conductor unit according to claim 8 which flows, in two parallel limbs of the U-shaped conductor unit constituting primary conductors, in an opposite direction. The arrangement is particularly suited to measure large currents, for instance in a current measuring range of 2000 A while the measurement is not invalidated by magnetic interference fields which would otherwise come up in case of high primary currents.
It is, however, also possible that, according to claim 9, a second measuring task may be solved wherein a difference of two currents in two primary conductors has to be measured which constitute an outgoing (to) conductor and a return (fro) conductor of an electric consuming device in order to detect possible fault currents in the load, a consuming device or a set-up. In the case of the last-mentioned measuring task, shielding of external magnetic interferences is of particular significance since the magnetic field gradient resulting from the primary currents in the outgoing and return conductor is small.
In both of the above-referenced configurations of the primary conductors, they are substantially arranged, according to claim 3, between the limbs of one of the two shield plates resulting in a compact structure of the total measuring arrangement together with the differential field sensor the effective sensor plane of which is disposed, according to claim 4, preferably outside of the limbs of the shield plate between which the primary conductors are arranged. In this way, a high measuring sensibility can be obtained without substantially attenuating the magnetic difference field, or the field gradient, respectively, covered by the differential field sensor.
In a basic arrangement for the potential-free measurement of currents according to claim 5, the limbs of the two shield plates are equally long and the two shield plates are disposed symmetrically relative to an effective sensor plane.
The effective sensor plane is that plane of the differential field sensor in which the transformation of the difference field, or the magnetic field gradient, respectively, into a signal voltage takes place, that is for instance the magneto-resistive layer and not the substrate, or the carrier, of the sensor.
While in a modified and space-optimized total arrangement according to claim 6 the limbs of one of the shield plates each are equally long, the limb pairs of the shield plates have a different length so that the one shield plate has two equally long shorter limbs while the other shield plate has two equally long longer limbs. The primary conductors are substantially arranged between the longer limbs of the corresponding shield plate. This means that the air gaps are arranged non-symmetrically relative to a middle plane disposed in the middle of the arrangement of the two shield plates in parallel to the webs thereof. At the same time, the effective sensor plane is displaced relative to the middle plane referred to. The webs are preferably plane sections of the shield plates which connect limbs bent to form right angles at them.
Both in case of the basic arrangement and in case of the modified arrangement, the shield plates extend in the longitudinal direction of their limbs substantially over the differential field sensor in order to shield it against external magnetic interference fields. The longitudinal direction of the limbs of the shield plates extends in parallel to the direction of the current in the primary conductors.
In that case in which the two primary conductors constitute component parts of a U-shaped conductor unit, the shield plates extend, for a good shielding of the differential field sensor against external magnetic interference fields, according to claim 10, suitably in the longitudinal direction of the limbs thereof substantially over the length of the limbs of the U-shaped conductor unit.
Typically, the shield plates of highly variable material may consist, according to claim 11, of mumetal or may, according to claim 12, be electric sheets in order to practically exclude, if the limbs of the shield plates are correctly positioned, the formation of any magnetic field gradient by external homogeneous or inhomogeneous magnetic fields, substantially independently from the interference direction of the interference fields from outside onto the two shield plates. This means also that an inhomogeneous magnetic field originating from a conductor which is a neighbor outside of the arrangement of the two shield plates does not have an interfering impact on the differential field sensor within the shield plate arrangement.
By positioning the air gaps and/or altering the dimensions of the shield plates, as referred to above, it is possible to readjust, or alter, the measuring sensitivity, or the measuring range, respectively, of the arrangement for the potential-free measurement of currents. An additional, particularly practicable possibility for the adjustment of the measuring range consists in that, according to claim 13, at least one soft-magnetic insert part shaped as an insert pin or insert strip is disposed within the two shield plates in order to influence the magnetic difference field in the effective sensor plane.
To this end, the at least one insert part may be arranged, according to claim 14, between the effective sensor plane and the primary conductors. In particular, two primary conductors which are arranged outside of the magnetic field sensitive range of the differential field sensor may attenuate the magnetic field decisive for the current measurement as compared to an arrangement without insert parts. If, however, at least one insert part is arranged in the magnetic field sensitive range of the differential field sensor, between the latter and the two primary conductors, the measuring sensitivity will be enhanced. In this way, a basic arrangement comprising the differential field sensor and the primary conductors within the shield plates may be adapted, by additional insert parts which are simple to handle to desired different measuring ranges, for instance for measuring ranges from 50 to 2000 A. In addition to the positioning of the insert part, or the insert parts, respectively, the position of the air gaps should, as a rule, be modified. To this end, the air gaps can, according to claim 18, be adjusted.
Typical variants of the positioning of the insert parts are described in claims 15 through 17.
In the case of an arrangement of at least one insert part either between the effective sensor plane and the primary conductors or between the effective sensor plane and the nearest neighboring shield plate, the impact of the at least one insert part on the measuring sensitivity, or the measuring range, respectively, is in general most significant.
By means of the at least one insert part, if necessary in connection with an adjustment of the air gap and with the basic set-up of the arrangement of the shield plates, of the primary conductors and of the differential field sensor remaining as it is, it is possible to establish in the effective sensor plane a measuring range of for instance between 50 through 2000 A.
Exemplified embodiments of the arrangement for the potential free measurement of currents will be explained in the following based on five figures from which further details, particularly as concerns the spatial-geometric disposal of the components of the arrangement, will be obtained.
In the basis arrangement according to
The two primary conductors 13, 14, as shown in detail in
In the case of this symmetrical arrangement of the shield plates 1, 2, the space between the limbs 7, 8 of the lower shield plate 2 is utilized by the integration of the primary conductors 13, 14 between the limbs while the inner space of the upper shield plate 1 between the limbs 4 and 5 remains free, that is, it is not used for the integration of components of the arrangement.
A first modified and in this way space-optimized arrangement is shown in
Both in the embodiment according to
The two primary conductors 25, 26, again, may be realized in the shape of a substantially U-shaped conductor unit.
In principle, however, the two primary conductors may also in all the embodiments of the arrangement displayed be separate outgoing and return conductors of an electric consuming device.
In the embodiments according to
More in detail, there is arranged, in the embodiment according to
Contrary thereto, in the embodiment according to
In the two embodiments according to
The embodiment according to
The insert parts may in particular consist of mumetal.
The fourth modified, simplified, arrangement shown in
The limbs 19′, 20′ in this arrangement, too, encompass two primary conductors 25′, 26′ parallel relative to each other in such a way that above the primary conductors 25′, 26′, space is left for the differential field sensor 24′. The effective sensor plane, not shown in
As concerns the adjustment of the measuring range described above, the embodiment according to
List of Reference Numerals
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 062 633 | Dec 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/010833 | 12/18/2008 | WO | 00 | 6/21/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/080286 | 7/2/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4841235 | Hastings et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5523677 | Kawakami et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5548208 | Lust | Aug 1996 | A |
6184679 | Popovic et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6411078 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441605 | Baurand et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6788046 | Lenhard et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6989666 | Kawase | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7250749 | Itoh | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7397233 | Sorensen | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8080994 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8115479 | Aimuta et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8203328 | Bose et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20040080307 | Ohtsuka | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060290340 | Shapiro | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070090826 | Itoh | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070279053 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20100259247 | Ibuki et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100264905 | Schmitt | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100301852 | Teppan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43 00 605 | Jul 1994 | DE |
198 19 470 | Jul 1999 | DE |
200 17 512 | Feb 2001 | DE |
0874244 | Oct 1998 | EP |
1746426 | Jan 2007 | EP |
WO 0011482 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0206844 | Jan 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100264905 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |