Rubber is typically reinforced with various embodiments of textile, glass or steel fibers to provide basic strength, shape, stability, and resistance to bruises, fatigue, and heat. These fibers may be twisted into plies and cabled into cords. Rubber tires of various construction as well as various industrial products such as belts, hoses, seals, bumpers, mountings, and diaphragms can be prepared using such cords.
Manufacturers of rubber reinforced articles have long realized the importance of the interfacial adhesion of reinforcement of its rubber environment. Specialized coatings such are resorcinol/formaldehyde latex adhesives for polymeric cords and brass plating for steel cords are typically applied to fiber and wire reinforcements to enable them to function effectively for tire use. In addition, the compounds used to coat these reinforcements are usually specially formulated to develop adhesion. For example, many tire manufacturers use various cobalt salts as bonding promoters in their steel cord wire coats, as well as using relatively high ratios of sulfur to cure accelerator. The bonding promoters are added through compounding. To achieve a maximum bonding strength, an excess amount of cobalt salt is often added to the wire coat. Since only a very small portion of the cobalt salt may be engaged in the rubber-metal interfacial bonding reaction, most of the cobalt salts remained in the compound as excess cobalt without any contribution to the bonding. Cobalt is expensive and may even cause aging problems of the rubber when used in excess, as well as having objectionable environmental effects.
It continuously remains desirable to improve adhesion of reinforcement cords to rubber while simultaneously improving the properties of the coat compounds and reducing their cost.
The present invention is directed to a method of treating a reinforcement cord, comprising the steps of
There is disclosed a method of treating a reinforcement cord, comprising the steps of
With reference now to the drawing, one embodiment of a method of treating a reinforcement cord according to the present invention is illustrated. In the process 10, carrier gas 13 is fed from storage vessel 12 to atomizer 20 along with monomer 15 from storage vessel 14, halogenated saturated hydrocarbon 17 from storage vessel 16. Optionally, one or more curatives 19 may be added from storage vessel 18. Carrier gas 13, monomer 15, halogenated saturated hydrocarbon 17 and optional curative 19 are atomized in atomizer 20 to form atomized mixture 21. Atomized mixture 21 is sent to plasma generator 22, where atmospheric plasma 24 is generated from atomized mixture 21. Reinforcement cord 26 is unwound from spool 30 and conveyed through plasma generator 22 and atmospheric plasma 24 for deposition of a surface treatment by the plasma 24. Treated reinforcement cord 28 exits plasma generator 22 and is wound onto spool 32 for storage.
The plasma generator may be any suitable plasma generation device as are known in the art to generate atmospheric pressure plasmas, such as atmospheric pressure plasma jet, atmospheric pressure microwave glow discharge, atmospheric pressure glow discharge, and atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge. In one embodiment, the plasma generator is of the dielectric barrier discharge type. The dielectric barrier discharge apparatus generally includes two electrodes with a dielectric-insulating layer disposed between the electrodes and operate at about atmospheric pressures. The dielectric barrier discharge apparatus does not provide one single plasma discharge, but instead provides a series of short-lived, self terminating arcs, which on a long time scale (greater than a microsecond), appears as a stable, continuous, and homogeneous plasma. The dielectric layer serves to ensure termination of the arc. Further reference may be made to U.S. Pat. No. 6,664,737 for its teaching regarding the operation of a dielectric barrier discharge apparatus.
By atmospheric pressure plasma, it is meant that the pressure of the plasma is equal to or slightly above the ambient pressure of the surroundings. The pressure of the plasma may be somewhat higher than ambient, such that the plasma pressure is sufficient to induce the desired flow rate through the atomizer and plasma generator.
The atomized mixture includes a carrier gas, at least one monomer, and a low viscosity organic solvent. When metallic reinforcements are used, the organic solvent is preferentially a halogenated hydrocarbon. Chlorine is the preferred halogen for this use.
Suitable carrier gas includes any of the noble gases including helium, argon, xenon, and neon. Also suitable as carrier gas are nitrogen, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, carbon monoxide, and air. In one embodiment, the carrier gas is argon.
The hydrocarbon sulfide includes sulfur olefins and polysulfide compounds represented by the general formula (2).
R1—Sx—R2 (2)
where R1 and R2 are univalent hydrocarbon groups, which may be the same or different, and x is an integer of 2 or more.
In one embodiment, R1 and R2 may be straight-chain or branched saturated or unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon groups of 2 to 20 carbon atoms (e.g. alkyl groups or alkenyl groups), or aromatic hydrocarbon groups of 6 to 26 carbon atoms, such as an ethyl group, propyl group, butyl group, nonyl group, dodecyl group, propenyl group, butenyl group, benzyl group, phenyl group, tolyl group, or hexyl phenyl group.
Specific examples of these that may be given include sulfur diisobutyl disulfide, dioctyl polysulfide, di-tertiary nonyl polysulfide, di-tertiary butyl polysulfide, di-tertiary benzyl polysulfide, di-tertiary-dodecyl polysulfide, or olefin sulfides obtained by sulfurizing with a sulfurizing agent olefins such as poly-isobutylene or terpene.
The amount of hydrocarbon sulfide may be expressed as a percent of the total components in the atomized mixture excluding the carrier gas, i.e., on a carrier gas free basis. In one embodiment, the amount of monomer ranges from 10 to 90 percent by weight of the total components in the atomized mixture on a carrier gas free basis. In one embodiment, the amount of hydrocarbon sulfide ranges from 20 to 50 percent by weight of the total components in the atomized mixture on a carrier gas free basis.
The atomized mixture includes a low viscosity organic solvent. By low viscosity solvent, it is meant that the solvent is of suitable viscosity to allow efficient atomization of the low viscosity organic solvent in a nebulizer or the like. In one embodiment, the low viscosity organic solvent is a substituted or unsubstituted organic solvent with one to ten carbon atoms. In one embodiment, the low viscosity organic solvent is capable of being atomized to a particle size of no more than 10 micrometers. In one embodiment, the low viscosity organic solvent is capable of being atomized to a particle size of no more than 30 micrometers. In one embodiment, the low viscosity organic solvent is capable of being atomized to a particle size of no more than 50 micrometers.
Suitable low viscosity organic solvents include hydrocarbons such as pentane, hexane, and toluene, ethers such as diethyl ether and tetrahydrofuran, alcohols such as methanol and ethanol, and various halogenated hydrocarbons. Suitable halogenated hydrocarbons include for example dichloromethane (methylene chloride), trichloromethane (chloroform), carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethane, chlorobutane, methyl chloride, allyl chloride, 1,2 dichloropropane, 2-chloro-2-methylpropane, and 1-chloro-2-methylpropane. The amount of low viscosity organic solvent may be expressed as a percent of the total components in the atomized mixture with the exception of the carrier gas, i.e., on a carrier gas free basis. In one embodiment in which a halogenated hydrocarbon is used, the amount of halogenated hydrocarbon ranges from 90 to 10 percent by weight of the total components in the atomized mixture on a carrier gas free basis. In one embodiment, the amount of halogenated saturated hydrocarbon ranges from 80 to 50 percent by weight of the total components in the atomized mixture on a carrier gas free basis.
As an alternative to a halogenated hydrocarbon, a non-halogenated low viscosity organic solvent may be used in combination with a suitable amount of chlorine gas, methyl chloride gas, or other suitable gaseous halogenated compound that is included in the atomized mixture or by direct addition to the plasma.
Optionally, the atomized mixture may include at least one curative, such as sulfur donors and accelerators. Alternatively, curatives may be absent from the material deposited on the reinforcement cord from the atmospheric plasma. In this case, curatives present in a rubber composition contacted with the reinforcement cord may serve to cure the deposited material via migration of the curatives from the rubber composition to the material deposited on the cord prior to cure. When used in the atomized mixture, curatives may be present in an amount ranging from 0.5 to 2 percent by weight on a carrier gas free basis.
The reinforcement cord is constructed of any of the various reinforcement materials commonly used in tires. In one embodiment, the reinforcement cord includes steel and polymeric cords. Polymeric cords may include any of the various textile cords as are known in the art, including but not limited to cords constructed from polyamide, polyester, polyketone, rayon, and polyaramid.
The reinforcement cord is exposed to the atmospheric plasma for a time sufficient to deposit an adhesively effect amount of polymerized or partially polymerized monomer onto the cord surface. By adhesively effective amount, it is meant that the treated cord will show increased adhesion to a cured rubber compound as measured by a standard adhesion test, such as ASTM Standard D2229-73. Generally, the exposure time required will depend on the concentration of monomer in the atomized mixture, the flow rate of atomized mixture into the plasma generator, and the power input to the plasma generator. For a batch process wherein stationary cord is exposed to an atmospheric plasma, the cord is exposed for from 1 to 100 seconds. In a continuous process, the exposure time may be characterized by a residence time expressed as the cord path length (e.g., in centimeters) through the plasma generator divided by the cord transit rate (e.g., in cm/sec). The residence time in such a continuous process would then range from 1 to 100 seconds.
The flow rate of atomized mixture into the plasma generator necessary to obtain an adhesively effective amount of polymerized or partially polymerized monomer onto the cord surface will depend on the desired face velocity in the plasma generator, i.e., the gas velocity (e.g., in cm/sec) passing perpendicular to a characteristic internal cross-sectional area of the plasma generator. Necessary flow rate may be determined by one skilled in the art without undue experimentation.
The atmospheric pressure plasma treated cord is generally used in a component of a pneumatic tire. The treated cord is calendered or otherwise contacted with a rubber composition to form the tire component using procedures as are known in the art. In various embodiments, the tire component may be a belt, carcass, apex, bead, chipper, flipper, or any other component including a cord reinforcement as are known in the art. In one embodiment, the tire component is a steel belt wherein treated steel tire cords are calendared into a rubber composition. In one embodiment, the tire component is a tire carcass wherein polymeric tire cords are contacted with a plycoat rubber composition.
It is readily understood by those having skill in the art that the rubber compositions used in tire components would be compounded by methods generally known in the rubber compounding art, such as mixing the various sulfur-vulcanizable constituent rubbers with various commonly used additive materials such as, for example, curing aids, such as sulfur, activators, retarders and accelerators, processing additives, such as oils, resins including tackifying resins, silicas, and plasticizers, fillers, pigments, fatty acid, zinc oxide, waxes, antioxidants and antiozonants, peptizing agents and reinforcing materials such as, for example, carbon black. As known to those skilled in the art, depending on the intended use of the sulfur vulcanizable and sulfur vulcanized material (rubbers), the additives mentioned above are selected and commonly used in conventional amounts.
The rubber compound may contain various conventional rubber additives. In one embodiment, the addition of carbon black comprises about 10 to 200 parts by weight of diene rubber (phr). In another embodiment, from about 20 to about 100 phr of carbon black is used.
A number of commercially available carbon blacks may be used. Included in, but not limited to, the list of carbon blacks are those known under the ASTM designations N299, N315, N326, N330, N332, N339, N343, N347, N351, N358, N375, N539, N550 and N582. Such processing aids may be present and can include, for example, aromatic, naphthenic, and/or paraffinic processing oils. Typical amounts of tackifying resins, such as phenolic tackifiers, range from 1 to 3 phr. Silica, if used, may be used in an amount of about 5 to about 100 phr, often with a silica coupling agent. Representative silicas may be, for example, hydrated amorphous silicas. Typical amounts of antioxidants comprise about 1 to about 5 phr. Representative antioxidants may be, for example, diphenyl-p-phenylenediamine, polymerized 1,2-dihydro-2,2,4-trimethylquinoline and others, such as, for example, those disclosed in the Vanderbilt Rubber Handbook (1990), Pages 343 through 362. Typical amounts of antiozonants comprise about 1 to about 5 phr. Representative antiozonants may be, for example, those disclosed in the Vanderbilt Rubber Handbook (1990), Pages 363 through 367. Typical amounts of fatty acids, if used, which can include stearic acid comprise about 0.5 to about 3 phr. Typical amounts of zinc oxide comprise about 2 to about 10 phr. Typical amounts of waxes comprise about 1 to about 5 phr. Often microcrystalline waxes are used. Typical amounts of peptizers comprise about 0.1 to about 1 phr. Typical peptizers may be, for example, pentachlorothiophenol and dibenzamidodiphenyl disulfide.
The vulcanization is conducted in the presence of a sulfur vulcanizing agent. Examples of suitable sulfur vulcanizing agents include insoluble sulfur, elemental sulfur (free sulfur) or sulfur donating vulcanizing agents, for example, an amine disulfide, polymeric polysulfide or sulfur olefin adducts. In one embodiment, the sulfur vulcanizing agent is elemental sulfur. In one embodiment, sulfur vulcanizing agents are used in an amount ranging from about 0.5 to about 8 phr. In another embodiment about 3 to about 5 phr of sulfur vulcanizing agents are used.
Accelerators are used to control the time and/or temperature required for vulcanization and to improve the properties of the vulcanizate. In one embodiment, a single accelerator system may be used, i.e., primary accelerator. Conventionally, a primary accelerator is used in amounts ranging from about 0.5 to about 2.5 phr. In another embodiment, combinations of two or more accelerators may be used, including a primary accelerator which is generally used in the larger amount (0.5 to 2.0 phr), and a secondary accelerator which is generally used in smaller amounts (0.05 to 0.50 phr) in order to activate and to improve the properties of the vulcanizate. Combinations of these accelerators have been known to produce a synergistic effect of the final properties and are somewhat better than those produced by use of either accelerator alone. In addition, delayed action accelerators may be used which are not affected by normal processing temperatures but produce satisfactory cures at ordinary vulcanization temperatures. Suitable types of accelerators that may be used in the present invention are amines, disulfides, guanidines, thioureas, thiazoles, thiurams, sulfenamides, dithiocarbamates and xanthates. In one embodiment, the primary accelerator is a sulfenamide. In another embodiment, if a second accelerator is used, the secondary accelerator may be a guanidine, dithiocarbamate, thiuram, or a second sulfenamide.
The rubber compound may contain any of the cobalt materials known in the art to further promote the adhesion of rubber to metal in the case of the use of steel reinforcement cords. One advantage of the present invention is the reduction and possible elimination of cobalt compounds. However, it may be desirable to have some amounts that are present. Thus, suitable cobalt materials which may be employed include cobalt salts of fatty acids such as stearic, palmitic, oleic, linoleic and the like; cobalt salts of aliphatic or alicyclic carboxylic acids having from 6 to 30 carbon atoms, such as cobalt neodecanoate; cobalt chloride, cobalt naphthenate; cobalt carboxylate and an organo-cobalt-boron complex commercially available under the designation Manobond C from Wyrough and Loser, Inc, Trenton, N.J. Manobond C is believed to have the structure:
in which R8 is an alkyl group having from 9 to 12 carbon atoms.
Amounts of cobalt compound which may be employed depend upon the specific nature of the cobalt material selected, particularly the amount of cobalt metal present in the compound.
In one embodiment, the amount of the cobalt material may range from about 0.2 to 5 phr. In another embodiment, the amount of cobalt compound may range from about 0.5 to 3 phr. In one embodiment, the amount of cobalt material present in the stock composition is sufficient to provide from about 0.01 percent to about 0.50 percent by weight of cobalt metal based upon total weight of the rubber stock composition. In another embodiment, the amount of cobalt material present in the stock composition is sufficient to provide from about 0.03 percent to about 0.2 percent by weight of cobalt metal based on total weight of wire coat composition.
In the case of polymeric reinforcement cords, the atmospheric pressure plasma treated cord may be further treated with one or more of RFL (resorcinol-formaldehyde-latex), isocyanate or epoxide type dips. Such dips are well known to those skilled in the art.
The tire containing the tire component can be built, shaped, molded and cured by various methods which will be readily apparent to those having skill in such art.
The prepared tire of this invention is conventionally shaped and cured by methods known to those having skill in such art.
While the invention as described herein has been directed to reinforcement cords and tires, the method is not so limited. Other applications of reinforcement cords, which includes tire cords, as treated by the methods described herein can be envisioned. Any rubber or elastomer article of manufacture reinforced with reinforcement cords can utilize cords as treated by the methods described herein. For example, applications of the treated reinforcement cords using the plasma methods described herein include reinforced hoses, transmission belts, drive belts, air springs, conveyor belts, drive tracks, and the like. Thus, the methods as described herein as suitable for treatment of tire cords are equally applicable to the treatment of any reinforcement cord as used in reinforced rubber or elastomer articles of manufacture. Such reinforcement cords may be in the form of individual cords or as a fabric.
The invention is further described with reference to the following examples.
In this example, the effect of plasma treatment with a hydrocarbon sulfide (di-t-nonylpolysulfide, from Arkema) on the adhesion of metal to rubber is illustrated. Galvanized steel coupons were treated with an atmospheric argon plasma in a Plasmatreater 400 AS from Plasmatreat US LP, Elgin, Ill. The plasma was generated using a ionization argon gas flow rate of 800 L/hour, a plasma frequency of 25 kHz, duty cycle of 42%, torch velocity of 10 m/min, a torch/raster offset of 1 mm, a treatment number of 1, and a nozzle height of 5 mm.
Hot-dip galvanized steel coupons (1 inch×5 inches) were cleaned by sandblasting to remove surface layer chemical species to expose essentially pure metal surfaces, followed by an ultrasonic bath in acetone and air drying. Cleaned galvanized steel coupons were exposed to an atmospheric plasma generated from a nebulized gas mixture of various compositions as given in Table 1. The liquid species were nebulized into argon gas (0.8 L/min) using an ultrasonic nebulizer from Sonaer Ultrasonics (Model 241PG, frequency—2.4 MHz, ultrasonic power—12-15 watts) operated at 65% of the ultrasonic power. The nebulized mixture as then mixed with the ionization argon gas stream to form the final plasma.
Adhesion of plasma treated galvanized steel coupons to rubber was tested with a lap shear test. Each lap shear specimen was made by interposing a mylar sheet with a precut window of 15 mm by 25 mm between a plasma treated galvanized steel coupon and an uncured wirecoat rubber compound sheet, thus defining the contact area as the dimensions of the window. The galvanized steel coupon was offset from the rubber sheet an amount sufficient to allow grip during the lap shear test. A brass coupon identical in size to the galvanized steel coupon was then laid over the rubber sheet on the side opposite of the mylar sheet and galvanized steel coupon. The brass coupon was offset to allow grip during the lap shear test. The layered specimen was then cured in a press at 10 tons pressure for 30 minutes at 155° C. Cured specimens were tested for lap shear strength in a Instron machine using a 50 kN load cell. Results of the lap shear tests with standard deviations are given in Table 2, with all results representing the average of at least four duplicate samples.
An additional control sample 5 using a brass coupon in place of the galvanized steel coupon was prepared and tested for lap shear.
As seen in Tables 1 and 2, the presence of the di-t-nonylpolysulfide in the plasma treatment of the galvanized steel coupon (Sample 4) gives rubber adhesion comparable to that of the brass coupon (Sample 5), both in terms of the fracture force and fracture energy. By comparison, the galvanized steel coupon treated with a plasma including squalene (Sample 3) shows lower adhesion. The inclusion of the hydrocarbon sulfide material thus leads to superior adhesion as compared to the non-sulfur containing hydrocarbon.
1Fracture force is the force applied at failure of the lap shear specimen
2Fracture energy is obtained by integrating the area under the force vs. displacement curve as measured during Instron pull, then referenced to the mylar window dimensions
3Sample 5 made with a brass coupon in place of the galvanized steel coupon
Standard brass-coated wire technology requires long cure times and high sulfur levels to general good adhesion between the rubber compound and the wire via interaction of copper from the brass wire and sulfur from the rubber compound to general copper sulfide. Additionally, wire coat compounds contain cobalt salts that aid in preventing the breakdown of the copper-sulfur interaction over time.
As seen in the results of the present invention, plasma coated wire technology allows the potential for the use of rubber formulations atypical of wire coat compounds that may be better for long term adhesion between the wire and rubber. The technology may also allow the elimination of cobalt salts which is beneficial from an environmental and cost standpoint. In one embodiment, then, the rubber composition in contact with the plasma treated reinforcement cord is exclusive of cobalt compounds. The technology may also allow the use of steel cord that is not brass coated, again beneficial from an environmental and cost standpoint. In one embodiment, then, the plasma treated reinforcement cord is exclusive of brass or copper.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3817778 | Wright | Jun 1974 | A |
3835082 | Wright | Sep 1974 | A |
4269250 | Harrison | May 1981 | A |
4284543 | Hollis | Aug 1981 | A |
4421899 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4436853 | Schloman, Jr. | Mar 1984 | A |
4606930 | Ueno et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4636435 | Yanagihara et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4693927 | Nishikawa et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4804436 | Debroche et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4850412 | Gupta | Jul 1989 | A |
4906680 | Umeda et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5041304 | Kusano et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053246 | Shuttleworth et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5283119 | Shuttleworth et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284543 | Kusano et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5290378 | Kusano et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5365988 | Soderberg et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5376413 | Callebert et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5399832 | Tanisaki et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414324 | Roth et al. | May 1995 | A |
5501880 | Parker et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5878564 | De Vos et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6096156 | Morin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120911 | Beers et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6425426 | Osborne et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436481 | Chabrecek et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6497954 | Morin et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6533008 | Lickes et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6610068 | Yang | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613394 | Kuckertz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6664737 | Berry et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6774018 | Mikhael et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6886320 | Rowan | May 2005 | B2 |
6896932 | Huang et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6966351 | Scarpitti | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6988520 | Watkins et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7252129 | Michiels et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259199 | Sandstrom | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7353852 | Hitotsuyanagi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7455892 | Goodwin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7517561 | Haack et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7557019 | Mikhael et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7614436 | Michiels et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8053510 | Sandstrom et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8445074 | Siffer et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20020185206 | Pereira et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030068449 | Steinberg et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030100703 | Hahn | May 2003 | A1 |
20040022945 | Goodwin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040159382 | Armellin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20070093076 | Mikhael et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070202270 | Rose et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070256770 | Segawa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090133923 | Kotsubo et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090238989 | Dadheech et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100084348 | Munn | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110121107 | Siffer et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121108 | Rodewald et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110241269 | Siffer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110244139 | Siffer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120067485 | Imhoff et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1302257 | Jul 2001 | CN |
1468154 | Jan 2004 | CN |
101096820 | Jan 2008 | CN |
102212963 | Oct 2011 | CN |
0346055 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0901914 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1302503 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1726615 | Nov 2006 | EP |
2371882 | Oct 2011 | EP |
S59179632 | Oct 1984 | JP |
2004360113 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2009275303 | Nov 2009 | JP |
WO0228548 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO03086031 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO2006048649 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2006135347 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO2008057759 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008060522 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kang, H.M., et al., Surface Modification of Steel Tire Cords via Plasma Etching and Plasma Polymer Coating: Part 1 Adhesive Properties, Adhesive Properties, Mar. 22, 2000, 53-62, 35, Elastomer Seoul. |
Kang, H.M., et al., Surface Modification of Steel Tire Cords via Plasma Etching and Plasma Polymerization Coating: Part II. Characterization, Characterization, Mar. 22, 2000, Elastomer Seoul. |
Kang, H.M., et al., ThomsonXP-002655343, No date, No volume number. |
EPO Search Report dated Jan. 27, 2014. |
Delattre, J.L., Plasma-polymerized thiophene films for enhanced rubber-steel bonding Applied Surface Science, vol. 252, Issue 10, Mar. 15, 2006, pp. 3912-3919. |
HRJ-11995. [Online] Available: http://siigroup.com/productinfo.asp?ID=99. |
Hercolyn® D. [Online] Available: http:www.pinovasolutions.com. |
SP-1056. [Online] Available: http://siigroup.com/productinfo.asp?ID=126. |
Staybelite® Ester 10. [Online] Available: http://www.pinovasolutions.com. |
TPS 37™ LS. Online] Available: http://www.arkema-inc.com/tds/1000.pdf. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140099463 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61709446 | Oct 2012 | US |