This application is a 371 filing of International Patent Application PCT/AU2009/001644 filed Dec. 17, 2009.
The present invention relates to an attrition mill and a method of grinding a material.
The term “attrition mill” is herein used to include mills used for fine grinding for example, stirred mills in any configuration such as bead mills, peg mills; wet mills such as colloid mills, fluid energy mills, ultrasonic mills, petite pulverisers, and the like grinders. In general, such mills comprise a grinding chamber and an axial impeller having a series of mainly radially directed grinding elements such as arms or discs, the impeller being rotated by a motor via a suitable drive train. The grinding elements are approximately equally spaced along the impeller by a distance chosen to permit adequate circulation between the opposed faces of adjacent grinding elements and having regard to overall design and capacity of the mill, impeller speed and diameter, grinding element design, mill throughput and other factors.
Such mills are usually provided with grinding media and the source material to be ground is fed to the mill as a slurry. Although the invention is herein described with particular reference to the use of various forms of grinding media added to the mill, it will be understood that the invention may be applied to mills when used for autogenous or semi-autogenous grinding. In the case for example of a stirred mill used for grinding pyrite, arseno-pyrite, or the like, the grinding medium may be spheres, cylinders, polygonal or irregularly shaped grinding elements or may be steel, zircon, alumina, ceramics, silica-sand, slag, or the like. In the case of a bead mill used to grind a sulphide ore (for example galena, pyrite) distributed in a host gangue (for example, shale and/or silica) the gangue may itself be sieved to a suitable size range, for example 1-10 millimeters or 1-4 millimeters, and may be used as a grinding medium. The media size range is dependant on how fine the grinding is required to be. From about 40% to about 95% of the volume capacity of the mill may be occupied by grinding media.
It should be recognized that in the grinding process, grinding media undergoes size reduction as does source material to be ground. Grinding media which is itself ground to a size no longer useful to grind source material is referred to as “spent” grinding media. Grinding media still of sufficient size to grind source material is referred to as “useful” grinding media.
A source material to be ground, for example a primary ore, mineral, concentrate, calcine, reclaimed tailing, or the like, after preliminary size reduction by conventional means (for example to 20-200 microns), is slurried in water and then admitted to the attrition mill through an inlet in the grinding chamber. In the mill, the impeller causes the particles of grinding media to impact with source material, and particles of source material to impact with each other, fracturing the source material to yield fines (for example 0.5-90 microns). It is desirable to separate the coarse material from the fines at the mill outlet so as to retain useful grinding media and unground source material in the mill while permitting the fines and spent grinding media to exit the mill.
In some attrition mills, outlet separation is achieved by means of a perforated or slotted screen at, or adjacent to, the mill exit and having apertures dimensioned to allow passage of spent grinding media and product but not permitting passage of useful grinding media. For example, if it is desired to retain particles of greater than 1 mm in the mill, the outlet screen aperture width would be a maximum of 1 mm so that only particles smaller than 1 mm would exit the mill through the screen. The outlet may in addition comprise a scraper or a separator rotor to reduce screen clogging. The axial spacing between the facing surfaces of the separator rotor and the last downstream grinding element is approximately equal to the spacing between the facing surfaces of all the other pairs of grinding elements.
The design and operation of attrition mills and media selection is highly empirical. Although various mathematical computer-based models have been proposed, none have yielded satisfactory predictions of mill performance.
In attempting to finely grind a sulphide ore using various grinding media in a high throughput bead mill e.g. having a mill throughput of greater than 10 TPH, it was found that the outlet screen rapidly clogged reducing the throughput to an intolerably low level. Moreover, the rate of wear of the separator rotor and outlet screen rendered operation uneconomic.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,797,550, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by cross reference, describes an attrition mill having improved means for classification and/or separation of coarse particles from fine particles in a slurry. The attrition mill described in this patent comprises a grinding chamber, an axial impeller, a chamber inlet for admitting coarse particles, and a separator comprising a chamber outlet through which fine particles exit from the chamber. The mill is characterised in that a classification between coarse and fine particles is performed in the mill upstream of the separator. By conducting classification between fine and coarse particles upstream from the mill outlet, the maximum size of particles exiting from the mill is substantially independent of the minimum orifice dimensions of the chamber outlet.
Classification may take place in this mill by providing a classifier element defining a first surface in rotation about an axis, a second surface spaced from and facing the first surface so as to define a passage there between, a classifier inlet for admitting slurry to the passage, a first classifier and outlet spaced from the classifier inlet whereby the slurry exits from the passage, a second classifier outlet spaced radially outwardly of the classifier inlet, and means for causing the slurry to flow from the classifier inlet to the first classifier outlet at a predetermined volumetric flow rate. The first surface is spaced sufficiently closely to the second surface and is rotated at sufficient speed so that a majority of the particles in the passage having a mass of less than a predetermined mass remained entrained with slurry flowing into the first classifier outlet and a majority of the particles exceeding a predetermined mass are disentrained and move outwardly from the passage at the second classifier outlet.
The passage may be defined between two members which may be rotated (or counter rotated) independently of the axial impeller and/or of each other.
The attrition mill of this patent may also include a separator stage comprising a separator rotor mounted to the impellor and spaced axially from an endplate to define a radially extending separation passage therebetween, said first classifier outlet admitting slurry to the separation passage at a radially inner region of the separator element, baffle means at or near the separation passage periphery to permit passage of coarse particles travelling outwardly to beyond the separation passage periphery, and a slurry outlet spaced axially from the radially extending separation passage to permit passage of the fine particles out of the mill. The baffle means may be in the form of axial fingers positioned around the periphery of the separator rotor and extending towards the chamber outlet.
The attrition mill described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,797,550 is commercially available from the present applicant and is sold under the trademark ISAMILL™.
It is known that attrition mills, such as the prior art attrition mills described above, include a plurality of grinding discs mounted to a rotating shaft. These grinding discs typically include a series of openings, such as a plurality of equiangularly spaced openings. During use of prior art attrition mills, the slurry circulates through the apertures in the grinding discs and particles also went between facing surfaces of the grinding discs and flung against other particles, against the shaft between the grinding discs, against the disc surfaces and against the mill walls. The slurry circulates a radial direction between the discs and adjacent to the shaft.
The attrition mill is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,797,550 has proven to be technically and commercially successful.
The present invention now provides an improved attrition mill.
In one aspect, the present invention provides an attrition mill having
The present invention arose during studies conducted on attrition mills constructed in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 5,797,550. Although the attrition mill described in this US patent has met with considerable commercial success, these mills may be susceptible to significant variations in flow rate through the mill. For example, changing the flow rate of material being fed to the mill can cause significant movement of media within the mill. In some cases, the media can pass into the classification and separation stage, which may result in loss of grinding media from the mill. This is an undesirable outcome.
Although the present inventors do not fully understand the mechanism involved in the present invention, it has been found that providing at least one grinding element that provides a larger flow path therethrough, when compared to other of the grinding elements, acts to suppress or ameliorate excessive movement of media through the mill when variations in flow rate occur by reducing the superficial velocity allowing the media in the slurry to settle.
In some embodiments, the at least one grinding element that provides a larger flow path therethrough is positioned towards a downstream end of the grinding chamber. For example, if the attrition mill includes eight grinding discs, a grinding disc providing a larger flow path therethrough may be positioned at disc 7, in other cases the larger flow path therethrough may be positioned at disc 6, while in other cases the larger flow path therethrough may be positioned at disc 5 (in these embodiments, disc 1 is positioned near the inlet end of the grinding chamber and disc 8 is positioned near the outlet end of the grinding chamber). In other applications, the disc providing the larger flowpath therethrough may be located at other disc positions in the mill.
In one embodiment, the grinding element that provides a large flow path therethrough may comprise a plurality of radially-extending arms. The grinding element may have two to six radially extending arms extending from a central portion. In some embodiments, the grinding element may have four radially extending arm extending from a central point and may have a shape that is similar to the German World War II medal known as an “iron cross”. In some embodiments, the grinding element that provides a large flow path therethrough may comprise a cross-like member.
In other embodiments, the grinding element that provides a large flow path therethrough may comprise a grinding disc having apertures therethrough, with the total open area of the apertures being larger than the open area of the apertures in another of the grinding discs in the mill.
The present inventors have also discovered that the beneficial effects of the present invention, in terms of minimizing the suitability of the mill to excessive movement of media arising from changes in the flowrate of material to the mill can be obtained by providing a mill having one, two or more grinding elements having large flow path therethrough, or indeed by providing the mill with all of the grinding elements having a large flow path therethrough. In some applications the open area in the grinding element created to allow a larger flow path as a proportion of the grinding element's surface area without such allowance can be from 15% to equal to or less than 100%. In some applications the open area in the grinding element created to allow a larger flow path as a proportion of the grinding element's surface area without such allowance can be from 20% to equal to or less than 100%. In some applications the open area in the grinding element created to allow a larger flow path as a proportion of the grinding element's surface area without such allowance can be from 25% to equal to or less than 100%. In some applications the open area in the grinding element created to allow a larger flow path as a proportion of the grinding element's surface area without such allowance can be from 30% to equal to or less than 100%.
Accordingly, in a second aspect, the present invention provides an attrition mill having
In this specification, the percentage open area is calculated as the surface area of the apertures (equivalent to the total size of the apertures) and this is then divided by the difference of the full surface area of the disc without the apertures, minus the area of the central hub.
In the example shown in
Area of Full Disc=25434 mm2
Area of Hub=3957 mm2
Area of Apertures=13501 mm2
Open Area=63%.
In
It will be appreciated that the drawings have been provided for the purposes of illustrating preferred embodiments of the present invention. Therefore, it will be understood that the present invention should not be considered to be limited side to the features as shown in the attached drawings.
With reference to
With reference to
The mill shown in
The mill shown schematically in
In presently available ISAMILL™, each of the grinding discs 14A to 14H are essentially identical to each other. However, the present inventors have found that attrition mills having this configuration may be susceptible to significant movement of the media within the mill if the flowrate of material being fed to the mill varies. To overcome this difficulty, the present inventors have found that replacing one or more of the grinding discs with grinding discs having a larger flow area therethrough (than grinding discs presently being used in such mills) achieves a reduction in movement of media through the mill.
In embodiments of the present invention, the disc that provides a larger flow path therethrough may be placed at the position of disc 14G, as shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be susceptible to variations and modifications other than those specifically described. It will be understood that the present invention encompasses all such variations and modifications that fall within its spirit and scope.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2008906540 | Dec 2008 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2009/001644 | 12/17/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/8/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/068993 | 6/24/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3149789 | Szegvari | Sep 1964 | A |
3432109 | Geissel | Mar 1969 | A |
4108385 | Funk | Aug 1978 | A |
5333804 | Liebert | Aug 1994 | A |
5597126 | Frommherz et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5797550 | Woodall et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5984213 | Woodall et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6405952 | Zoz | Jun 2002 | B1 |
7073738 | Sneeringer et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7226005 | Jones et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20050051651 | Enderle | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2249636 | Mar 1997 | CN |
2376334 | May 2000 | CN |
1 183 344 | Feb 1962 | DE |
447498 | Oct 1974 | SU |
DE 3900262 | Jul 1990 | TW |
WO 2009024159 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/AU2009/001644, mailed Feb. 11, 2010. |
Supplementary European Search Report, Appl. No. EP 09832722.4, Nov. 10, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110309174 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |